More to the point: how many of these things airborne to make it worth tactically EMP-ing an area. It's not like they handle lightening storms well to begin with.
Also, Lightning hasn’t caused a plane crash in the civilian world in fifty five years. And yet you think a military aircraft which doesn’t have the option to just go around a storm is going to be vulnerable? No.
Next you’ll dredge up some random news article about how the military doesn’t feel like risking flying in a storm for no reason, and somehow interpret that to mean that they can’t.
>Also, Lightning hasn’t caused a plane crash in the civilian world in fifty five years
for civilian planes lightnings are not a problem (although they DO damage the aircraft structure and eletronics they will not set it on fire), the big problems are the massive turbulences that will make you lose control of the aircraft and possibly crash >t. pilot
probably the mesh in the door
The F-35 doesn't even have a microwave, in an attempt to combat flight crew obesity they replaced it with an air fryer. Makes good tendies tho
>white people microwave they combat aircraft
More to the point: how many of these things airborne to make it worth tactically EMP-ing an area. It's not like they handle lightening storms well to begin with.
>implying rf wunderwaffen arent a thing yet
What's the tactical advantage of making a dummy radar target?
EMPs are a meme
Also, Lightning hasn’t caused a plane crash in the civilian world in fifty five years. And yet you think a military aircraft which doesn’t have the option to just go around a storm is going to be vulnerable? No.
Next you’ll dredge up some random news article about how the military doesn’t feel like risking flying in a storm for no reason, and somehow interpret that to mean that they can’t.
> flying in a storm
Storms have a lot dangers besides some lil sparks.
What about that Air France flight?
>Also, Lightning hasn’t caused a plane crash in the civilian world in fifty five years
for civilian planes lightnings are not a problem (although they DO damage the aircraft structure and eletronics they will not set it on fire), the big problems are the massive turbulences that will make you lose control of the aircraft and possibly crash
>t. pilot
>It's not like they handle lightening storms well to begin with.
>Blabbering on about EMPs
What is this retarded tourist bullshit?
Speaking of lightning, it's funny that the Lightning has 2 engines and the Lightning 2 has 1 engine.
>what's stopping X from hitting something that it can't see
Why is everyone who doesn't have it seething about this plane?
Because they can't duplicate it, they know they can't beat it, and they know it renders their own airforce effectively useless.
You having technology more advanced that sun dried bricks made of dung and straw is the obvious answer Ragnesh.
The sacred excretions of real cow (not the j*rsey animal) produce us with materials stronger than titanium and lighter than paper.
google square cube law
>Whats stopping a microwave energy pulse from rendering this thing useless?
The Inverse-square law