Anything written in Americunt .something numbers is a piece of shit.
.380 - too faggy for a 9mm?
.38 - stop playing fucking cowboy and get 17 rounds not 6
.357 - same
.40 - weaker 10mm
.45 - like most Americans overweight for no gain in performance
In pistol calibres you'll just need 9mm for everyday use, 10mm if capable and needing something extra. Everything else is just fudd.
Nothing ... if you use it within its limitations. I'm not interested in one, but I'm not about shitting on it, either. I have no desire to catch any .380 bullets with any portion of my body. It's just very weak compared to other possibilities with the identical compromises.
If you're gonna carry for self defense, 9mm is significantly "better" in almost any metric. For concealed, compact firepower, I'd look at Sig P365 micro stainless in 9mm, or something better, long before I'd accept the ballistic compromises of .380. In an emergency situation, of course I'd use .380. If I get to plan ahead, it's not really an option I'd consider.
The 365 micro is rated for P+ (which I'd probably not use, usually), but has 10, 12 & 15 round magazines, all of which are far more than sufficient for a compact SD weapon. If conceal & compact aren't a high priority, there are other options.
Weak as fuck, poor penetration. Any other retardo questions?
Yeah. Are you free on Saturday to go out to dinner with me?
Sure but you should know I'm trans. Weak as fuck, poor penetration.
What about a pocket pussy? Worth it or nah?
nothing good energy out of short barrels and typically comes in a get off me gun anyway plenty of people killed with 389
nothing
autists can only focus on numbers without context
Anything written in Americunt .something numbers is a piece of shit.
.380 - too faggy for a 9mm?
.38 - stop playing fucking cowboy and get 17 rounds not 6
.357 - same
.40 - weaker 10mm
.45 - like most Americans overweight for no gain in performance
In pistol calibres you'll just need 9mm for everyday use, 10mm if capable and needing something extra. Everything else is just fudd.
>Anything written in Americunt .something numbers is a piece of shit.
LOL
Funny thing the M2 .50 was literally one of the weakest aircraft guns of WW2, a heavy piece of shit that couldn't even be reliably synchronized.
Though I concede the .50 in ground and sniper use.
Anything else though sucks, for rifles you need 5.56 and 7.62 NATO.
>5.56 and 7.62 NATO
You mean .223 and .308?
No, I don't mean the faggy loadouts for people too weak for the real stuff. You can shoot the bs from NATO guns, but not the nato ammo in bs guns.
Guarantee you've never shot high grain 223 or one of bubba's pissin hot 308 loads you stinky eurotrash gay
Nothing, especially for pocket pistols.
It was invented by John Moses Browning.
So there is nothing wrong with it.
Nothing ... if you use it within its limitations. I'm not interested in one, but I'm not about shitting on it, either. I have no desire to catch any .380 bullets with any portion of my body. It's just very weak compared to other possibilities with the identical compromises.
If you're gonna carry for self defense, 9mm is significantly "better" in almost any metric. For concealed, compact firepower, I'd look at Sig P365 micro stainless in 9mm, or something better, long before I'd accept the ballistic compromises of .380. In an emergency situation, of course I'd use .380. If I get to plan ahead, it's not really an option I'd consider.
The 365 micro is rated for P+ (which I'd probably not use, usually), but has 10, 12 & 15 round magazines, all of which are far more than sufficient for a compact SD weapon. If conceal & compact aren't a high priority, there are other options.
Too bad sigs have too many issues to trust my life with