Whats preventing USA from destroying 3 Gorges Dam with 50 nuclear missiles and killing millions of Chinese people in the process?

What’s preventing USA from destroying 3 Gorges Dam with 50 nuclear missiles and killing millions of Chinese people in the process?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Having more than 2 neurons.

  2. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Stop thinking so small.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      ONE MILLION LIVES

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        CRISP

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      IMAGINE

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      PICTURE IT

  3. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    disrupting all the shit that unfortunately we all rely on. I frickin wish we would though. Globsal economic collapse be damned.

  4. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because nukes are fake & gay

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      gr8 b8 m8

  5. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    It would collapse the world economy and China would unironically nuke the US. Not like putin going "nooook!", no actually they would turn LA into a crater.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      That's a win/win honestly

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Bakersfield too.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Oh nooo, not LA!

      Anyway, don't use nukes. Surely there's a non-nuclear option to collapsing that piece of shit. No reason to invite nuclear retaliation, they might hit something important along with LA.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Largest port in the country doesn't matter

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Oh nooooo, how will 90% of the country's landmass ever recover from 10% of the landmass not being able to receive trinkets?????

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            Do you seriously think that if they nuke LA, they'll ONLY nuke LA? They launch a nuke, we launch nukes back, you know that, they know that, so if they launch nukes, they're going all out, so it wouldn't be 1 nuke on LA, it'd be 300+ nuclear devices across the United States. Christ people.

            • 7 months ago
              Anonymous

              M.A.D. is a meme moron. First strike overwhelmingly win in IRL scenarios. US is only one largely immune to this due to some classified and some unclassified advanced missile detection and interception capabilities. No other nation has this, despite their claims. So M.A.D. only works for other countries attacking US first.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >First strike overwhelmingly win in IRL scenarios
                Are you serious? For one thing WHAT IRL scenarios? Because there haven't been any last I frickin' checked when it comes to nuclear weapons. For two, most nations maintaining a nuclear arsenal maintain a second strike capability, the US and China both included, meaning that retaliation is very much almost guaranteed no matter what.
                >US is largely immune to this due to some classified and some unclassified capabilities
                You mean the ones that are primarily meant for usage against a certain rogue state headed by a very fat manchild with small individual launches and have very much not been tested in scenario with something in the range of 300-400 warheads massed and heading towards the US? We've had detection capabilities capable of detection basically on launch since the 1980s, you still don't get a ton of time, 15-30 minutes at most. Before you go and go "muh classified shit" , shut up and sit the frick down, because I could pull wunderwaffe out my ass too when it comes to whatever black projects they've got going on behind closed doors, what matters is widely deployed systems capable of forming a proper, nation-wide nuclear umbrella, or at least capable of protecting the majority of targets from, again, 300-400 warheads. I'm not talking prototypes or experiments, I mean things that are at operating capacity.

                >Says one place matters
                I say why the one place doesn't matter
                >B-but what if they hit more than the one place???

                Different guy, I was just pointing out that it sure as shit wouldn't be the only one hit, you'd be looking at other ports and cities, naval bases, silos, airfields, army bases etc being hit too. Frankly I think a bit of trinitite would make LA just a bit more bearable, even though I'd still have to worry about stepping on a junkie needle or something I bet.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                I think he's referring to the alleged ability to smack incoming missiles in ascent phase with high energy gamma bursts in the ionosphere.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                What a rube. You think they'll let you in on the real shit? Uh hello, delusions of grandeur department? It's on a need to know basis, bud. Those UFO tic-tacs? That is related to our nuclear missile defense capabilities. And by IRL I meant IRL simulations homosexual.

            • 7 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Says one place matters
              I say why the one place doesn't matter
              >B-but what if they hit more than the one place???

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >millions of fried rice
      >millions of fried beans
      >pedowood destroyed
      >millions of dead liberals

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      That's a win/win honestly

      Oh nooo, not LA!

      Anyway, don't use nukes. Surely there's a non-nuclear option to collapsing that piece of shit. No reason to invite nuclear retaliation, they might hit something important along with LA.

      Agreed on the win win there, but I doubt China could make a nuke happen by that point. Too much air defense and not enough nukes would fly at once. A few bunker buster are designed for that level of concrete. You dont need to destroy it, just weaken it and let the water pressure do the rest. Easier to speed along if you hit targets up river as well to increase the pressure.
      At the same time tell N Korea they can have parts of North China. They would flood in like vultures.

  6. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Millions of Chinese refugees swarming Europe and the U.S.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      uhhhh how the frick are they making it to Europe?

      they aint walking there, and we are tossing a missile at the trains every 25 miles

  7. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Same thing preventing China from nuking Hoover dam or cities: both sides have nukes of their own and would strike back obviously.

    Nice ChatGPT slide thread I guess, the spam has improved dramatically in the last few months even and can probably evade baleetion now unfortunately.

  8. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Empathy

  9. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >WHAT'S PREVENTING ONE NUCLEAR ARMED POWER FROM GOING TO NUCLEAR WAR WITH ANOTHER NUCLEAR ARMED POWER GUIZ!!!!?!?!!?!?!?!

  10. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >damposting
    Oh boy which US proxy fricked up this time

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Chang getting buckbroken by a moronic child's question.

  11. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    > 50 nuclear missiles
    Overkill
    Couple of well targeted JDAMs would do the trick
    > counting on Chang using chang-crete

  12. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Chinese concrete
    Even one tac nuke would probably be overkill.

  13. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    America doesn't want war with China and once they get their hands on that sweet, sweet chip tech they will drop the taiwan issue.

  14. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    le chinese are slowly killing themselves without any assistance from a foreign power, thanks to their poisoned soil and water.

  15. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    And destroy slave factories? For what purpose? It's not like Chinga is treating US in any way

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      AmeriKKKa evil war dog seeking to stir conflict. Ignore while we entire time of global peace with China as the steward.

  16. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Do we have to have this thread every week?

  17. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Radar and retaliation

  18. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >with 50 nuclear missiles
    Because one or two tomahawks would do the job?

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      a tomahawk only has a 1,000lb warhead.
      so two tomahawks will hardly scratch a dam.

  19. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Frickin space cops

  20. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    i thought B-2 doesn't have any nuclear missiles anymore? AGM-129 was retired.

  21. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    One fricking MOAB from a B21 would do it.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >B21
      a B-21 is smaller than a B-2.
      a B-2 can't carry a MOAB.
      a B-2 carries at most a MOP.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        A MOP would do the job better anyway, given that whatever is used, it needs to penetrate a shit load of reinforced concrete

  22. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    2 of the Georges are ok blokes, can't take out all 3 over 1 of them being a c**t

  23. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    What's preventing China from honoring its promises to invade Taiwan?

    Apparently the fact that the PLA got buck-broken by South Sudan of all countries.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      China isn't obligated to fulfill "promises" that only exist in your delusions, anon.

  24. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because of nukes, the same reason why the US will never touch North Korea despite their saber rattleling: https://youtu.be/ZpBxBuIzbV8?si=sztGzgJz_dZu2cQW

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because nuclear bombs stopped any kind of direct confrontation between nuclear armed countries: https://youtu.be/hOQ3EQjIo5I

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Noks have no nukes that can reach CONUS

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Noks have no nukes that can reach CONUS
        Hwasong-17 can, even Kim himself made a promo video of the test which according to the japs had a range of 15.000km: https://youtu.be/TyqwjgWHmO4

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Nork propaganda videos are so strange.

  25. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hit it with conventional munitions. If you're pulling the nuclear option you might as well saturate every population center with them rather than rely on the dam doing the job for you.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      One fricking MOAB from a B21 would do it.

      Oh nooo, not LA!

      Anyway, don't use nukes. Surely there's a non-nuclear option to collapsing that piece of shit. No reason to invite nuclear retaliation, they might hit something important along with LA.

      They'd still retaliate with WMDs

      Do we have to have this thread every week?

  26. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    The politicians and generals in chinas pocket

  27. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    The fact you only need one conventional torpedo. Those nukes are better spent on the CCP headquarters.
    I don't even want to destroy Beijing, just erase every trace of commie taint on its surface.

  28. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >what’s preventing the USA from a nuclear first strike on one of the largest manufacturers of consumer goods in the world
    What an insane question. I mean, nothing militarily, but WHY WOULD WE DO THAT

  29. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    These are the people who will join the military at age 18 and be responsible for not being an inhuman monster while armed.
    We are fricked.

  30. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    You don't need a nuclear weapon for that

  31. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Putin getting buckbroken by Ukraine
    >Iran getting buck broken by Israel
    >Xi pee pee just got buckbroken by an old man with dementia

    BRICSsisters………

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Just waiting for the collapse of Safrica.
      Brazil doesn't matter.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >US getting back brocken by the Taliban in 2021
      We're literally living "Late Bronze Age collapse" of the 21st century

  32. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >It's expensive
    >It'd cause another refugee crisis
    >It'd delete Chinese-International trade relations
    >The Chinese would nuke Guam
    >The Chinese would nuke California
    >The Chinese would nuke Alaska
    >The Chinese would nuke Hawaii
    >The Russians would probably take advantage
    >Some other morons might try and take advantage
    >There just isn't really a reason to do it other than the lulz
    It would be kinda funny though in a fricked up kind of way

  33. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why? I thought it was cracking? I thought China's stock market was collapsing in 2018?

  34. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    What's preventing the USA from launching 1 nuclear missile at Rome and killing millions of people?

    Italy doesn't even have any nuclear weapons to retaliate with.

    The only nuclear nations in Europe are the UK and France, and neither of those has much of a stockpile. We could go hog wild.

  35. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Diplomacy, restraint, and knowing what a headache it'd be worldwide.

  36. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is there any info map showing what will be the water level and the affected area if the dam will collapse?

  37. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    China makes what we want, not need.
    America made sure not ship overseas the integral things.

  38. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >we supply all your walmart stock
    that's a chinese privilege, not an american necessity

  39. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >What’s preventing USA from destroying 3 Gorges Dam with 50 nuclear missiles and killing millions of Chinese people in the process?
    Christian decency and valuing human life. It is what makes the West so superior to shit like stalin, mao, deng, xi, putin etc

  40. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    we're not at war yet, that's literally it, you wouldn't even need a nuke, just a B2 with a couple MOPs

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      pic in OP is literally a B-2 dropping a MOP

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        correct, but OP thinks it's 50 nuclear missiles for some reason, he's a very silly man

  41. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Fish and Wild Life Survife at the behest of the Federal Aviation Administration
    Get ride of these gays get StarShip flying and the 3GD is done

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *