What would a second civil war look like? What previous conflict would it be comparable to?
What would a second civil war look like? What previous conflict would it be comparable to?
What would a second civil war look like? What previous conflict would it be comparable to?
Camera technology significantly improved in 4 years
You'll stream it in 4k.
Ever learn about Abe?
He spent his entire life with crippling depression to the point that friends and family would often check on him expecting to find he offed himself. This only got worse as his life went on too as he buried I think 2 children.
He never answered people directly either, hed speak in stories that would lead people to their own conclusions. Unless provoked, he rarely spoke at all and when he did it was barely above a whisper, but everyone around would drop what they were doing to listen to him.
Abe was a really interesting dude.
Sounds like an incel
No wonder 2 of his kids died just like Biden, god hated his satanic ways.
>Abraham Lincoln
>satanic
Congratulations you're the first person I've ever unironically recommended meds to
his demon face showed after being responsible for killing hundreds of thousands of Americans.
The Civil War was started by the Confederacy. Abraham Lincoln is an American hero, who was straight and many children and entered Heaven, while John Wilkes Booth is still burning in Hell to this very day.
Cringe bait. The complete opposite is true though 🙂
Explain how, moron.
The Civil War was started by the Union. John Wilkes Booth is an American hero, who was straight and many children and entered Heaven, while Abraham Lincoln is still burning in Hell to this very day
>The Civil War was started by the Union
Explain how.
>John Wilkes Booth is an American hero
Wrong. He committed treason and would have been hanged like his co-conspirators had he not been offed.
>who was straight
Doubt it, he was into theater.
>and many children
He had no children.
>and entered Heaven
Murder is the ultimate sin.
>while Abraham Lincoln is still burning in Hell to this very day
Wrong.
My repeating numbers dictate that the Lord agrees with me, and he doesn’t like you. The USA is the great satan and it should have stayed separate thank you.
>The USA is the great satan and it should have stayed separate thank you.
Traitors' opinions aren't needed.
I accept your concession, Dixiegay.
Cringe frick off back to michigan or whatever shithole you live in.
Literally any state is better than your poor, hot, dumb, Black person-infested, backwater shithole.
>just because Lincoln's perception was that of insurrection, revolt, or rebellion doesn't make it so
The act of forcibly seizing federal property and threatening the government is exactly that.
>the sovereign states seceded legally
Nowhere in the Constitution was secession outlined, Madison himself said it wasn't protected nor legal unless it had the blessing of every state in the Union and the Supreme Court later struck down that argument.
>and peacefully
Firing on property that doesn't belong to you isn't peaceful.
>formed their own nation
About as much as CHAZ/CHOP did.
>the war was fought as federal republic vs federal republic and was concluded as such.
The war was fought between a nation and traitors.
>20 minutes and only one reply (now two because of me)
Oh sweaty you gotta bait better than that
Explain how it's bait, moron.
>explain to me how it's bait so I can stop from making the same mistake in the future
No
he sold his soul to the devil
fought for bankers to take self determination away from the South.
you Black folk can thank lincoln and the yankee zogbots for the 19th amendment. we wouldn't have passed it. during "reconstruction" our elections were even more rigged than they are now.
history isn't written by the winner or the loser, it is written by the lying press while israelites are allowed to own or work in media. you have blind faith in israelites if you think they didn't false flag.
>history isn't written by the winner or the loser, it is written by the lying press while israelites are allowed to own or work in media.
Who d you think wins all those wars?
your right about Booth though.
that israelite killed Lincoln because he wanted to send all the blacks home.
The israelites were planning for today for hundreds of years. They assassinated multiple presidents to do it.
Can you explain where the protocols came from? I cannot find anything and I guess my npc programming just makes me think it's fake. I can't find shit about it on the internet either other than obviously israeliteed sights.
You could of left the Southerners to use their farming equipment freely but you had to press them which led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of good people why are Americans so fricking stupid
What if I told you Abraham Lincoln and George Washington, are the same soul?
And he's here on earth right now?
No he ain't in the Q team or whatever people want to make of it.
The Alliance kept him out of everything.
Different role to play this time.
Much bigger than nation state affairs.
He’s a frickin fed
He was shot for issuing greenbacks instead of taking loans from the israelites at outrageous interests rates that would have sold the country back into slavery, the preservation of the US or at least what's left of it is because of him
Biden would be a skeleton within a week
No JWB headshot?
Missed opportunity
Abe Lincoln, claimed by some to be the first queer president. Figures.
Civil war would look like modern day Syria/Iraq
Major cities would look like charred, in rubble , and or just giant impact holes from missles/explosives/Sabotage/rifle fire
Pic related
War torn Syria
Oh I forgot to add , that civilians who don’t evacuate the area will remain and continue the day to day life
Markets could be filled to the brim but then some sort of skirmish breaks out in the middle of it and everyone ducks back inside or gets caught in the crossfire
If you want a good civil war movie
Cold Mountain
Really has some great realistic battle scenes
The crater scene is horrific
This.
The rebuilding will be glorious. Bones for mortar.
Nah, nothing is gonna happen, cause the targeted group is the most gay for muh government, muh military and muh blue lives. They'll just come grab your ass and throw it into a FEMA camp and you won't do shit.
This.
It would be an absolute shitshow.
We are too mixed to disentangle ourselves gracefully.
Good luck holding it all together when the dollar is worthless.
No way globohomosexual gets half the country
I would barely even give them the Mid-Atlantic region because it will get flooded by Black folk PDQ. Last one out gets stuck with all the Black folk and a giant bill.
Everyone else gets a repeal of all Federal regulations, all Federal debt, a reduction of welfare burdens, and an influx of skilled White men.
I kinda think the recent flurry of Supreme Court activity might be an attempt to stave off pic related.
Rate my map
It's fiat money, it was always worthless. It's value is tied to the projection of American strength both at home and abroad, and in that aspect, absolutely no one, not even chinks, are close to realistically challenging the US and it's EU and SEA golems. As long as western powers largely control the world, and it benefits the global economy, the US currency is going to remain a gaurantor for most of the world. If nothing else, because intentionally trying to move away from it will have very real consequences for whatever nation has the balls(Even Saudi Arabia only tries because they are sitting on a massive frickload of oil and can jocky for the interests of multiple powers).
Rest assured, even when you're living in the pod and eating the bugs, hoping our shitty dollar which hasn't retained value since it's inception to be the catalyst for your Red Dawn fantasies is an utter pipe dream. Push comes to shove people will just cut out the middleman and become serfs officialy
that's right, that with 1 dollar you own that fraction of circulation of it's sibling notes, and that they may be redeemed for a good or service offered for said notes, which are an allignment of GDP which is a circular logic thing but if you look at it as man-hours, doing varied tasks, gross production, etc. then well, you're basically counting turnips and blowjobs and THAT is what the money is valued by, which under normal circumstances yes, however derivitive banking exists and speculation. If i pay you offer to suck my dick for 5 turnips worht of money and i sell my 5 turnips by days end and you say now it's 6, well, surprise you've devalued my turnip money.
lots of guerrilla warfare, far right will decimate any opponent because normal people(not npc morons) are all sick of globohomo. If it happens within 30 years far right will win after that who knows, the next generations are filled with homosexuals who can’t even change a tire
>larping this hard
Most normies despise the far right. Also most places in the US which generate enough money to pay for a war and advanced weaponary are full of lefties. You fat rednecks and your AR15's would be eating a drone missile within about 10 mins of the first shot being fired, and nothing of value would be lost.
>let me tell you about your country and military
Black person
Yeah, who am I to lecture you idiots about how to run a country. We just have a low crime rate and less guns than people here and can even send our kids to school without worrying about school shootings.
>less guns than people
Who ever said that was desirable?
People who want to be able to send their kids to school without worrying that they'll end up getting shot by some schizo incel? People who like living in a functioning society?
What country are you from?
All societies are usually functional at some point every place has their day every human their fault. Power corrupts people eventually that corruption grows too big and you get civil unrest don't worry it's coming for you too just watch.
Sorry I'm probably dumb but where are you from I don't recognize that flag
Shut up you filthy Black person you live in a fricking ethno state of course you have low fricking crime
Ethnically homogeneous country with good tourist industry = Low crime
Don't use Jamaica as an example since they're a bunch of mutts
>What mercury-based pre-antibiotic syphilis treatment side effects does to a MF
Spelling clarification...
No one?
friendly reminder that Lincoln asked congress for war powers more times than can be counted on both hands and was denied as many times.
entire war was waged via executive orders - truly Lincoln's War
>the president shouldn't handle a war because he just shouldn't okay?!
If you would take more than just a cursory glance at our constitution then you would find that it is congress that has the power to wage war and not the president you braindead newbie
>congress that has the power to wage war
Against foreign nations. The Confederacy wasn't a legitimate or sovereign nation, they were renegades. And the Confederacy initiated the first action of the war.
>You act as though Lincoln could have held back the radical republicans forever
He was objectively more powerful following Union victory than before that happened.
>or be at odds with his own party.
This was literally the entirety of his presidency.
just because Lincoln's perception was that of insurrection, revolt, or rebellion doesn't make it so. the sovereign states seceded legally and peacefully then formed their own nation.
the war was fought as federal republic vs federal republic and was concluded as such.
>This was literally the entirety of his presidency.
Not to the point of being persona non grata, he fought with the radicals but he also played the role of the pragmatic compromiser. Now that the war was won, there was less need to compromise and he would have had to give way to radical legislation or end up a lame duck president.
>He was objectively more powerful following Union victory than before that happened.
He was more popular but that didn't give him any special ability to override congress. Thaddeus Stevens had more pull within party circles than Lincoln did and had congress at his back.
>Not to the point of being persona non grata
Opposing extreme RR legislation wouldn't make him any less popular in his second term than it did in his first term. And Lincoln had already vetoed the Wade-Davis Bill and opposed the Reconstruction Acts.
>there was less need to compromise and he would have had to give way to radical legislation or end up a lame duck president.
Lincoln wasn't able to be pushed over by radicals. The country supported him, not them.
>any special ability to override congress
He had already vetoed their legislation.
>Thaddeus Stevens had more pull within party circles than Lincoln did and had congress at his back.
Only among Radicals. Lincoln was more popular among moderate republicans and democrats.
You need to take your meds.
>the USA was occupying Confederate territory and refused to leave
Federal property didn't just magically become Confederate property just because traitors declared their "independence". For the same reason property in Seattle didn't automatically go to CHOP.
>Buchanan did nothing because there's nothing he could do
He tried numerous times to get the Confederacy to rejoin the Union diplomatically, which Lincoln continued until they attacked federal property. Had that happened under Buchanan, Buchanan too would have fought defensively against the traitors.
>Federal property didn't just magically become Confederate property just because traitors declared their "independence".
The Crown's property didn't just magically become the United State's property just because traitors declared their "independence".
>The Crown's property didn't just magically become the United State's property just because traitors declared their "independence".
Correct. And it wasn't until England officially ceded all territory to the Patriots.
>secession was legal prior to the war; it was taught at west point. the southern states went through legal channels to do so and at the end of the day the senators all shook hands and went their separate ways. with half the states
Literally all of this is false. There were no legal channels to secede. They didn't bring the case before the Supreme Court and then started acting belligerently and violently to the American government and its property.
>it was greed that motivated Lincoln to bring the errant misguided children back into the fold - not "saving the union"
No, it was to put down the insurrectionists and then reestablish the Union of states. Which he did and all the Southern states rejoined amicably.
The USA fricked the southern states every chance they got. Everything south of the Mason Dixon line was to be slave states and the USA reneged on that and we got virtual war between Kansas and Missouri long before secession.
With knowing that most of the slave trade was israelite ran, as well as textiles being israelite ran - is it possible we (as southron men) were duped into fighting a war that was for israelites, instead of our best interest (states rights). Im still questioning it.
t.born and raised in SC, now live in TN
much like the Ukraine/Russia conflict there was no-one to root for - both sides are fricked up and the poor with no vested interest are the cannon fodder.
hell, that's damn near every war. I feel like everything I come to have pride in, is immediately taken away from me upon further understanding.
secession was legal prior to the war; it was taught at west point. the southern states went through legal channels to do so and at the end of the day the senators all shook hands and went their separate ways. with half the states and 3/4 of the revenue gone it was greed that motivated Lincoln to bring the errant misguided children back into the fold - not "saving the union"
>The act of forcibly seizing federal property and threatening the government is exactly that.
the USA was occupying Confederate territory and refused to leave. Buchanan did nothing because there's nothing he could do. Lincoln was an evil tyrant and got was coming to him albeit a few years too late
reminder that the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments were illegitimately ratified because the yankees installed puppet state legislatures in the south to ratify the amendments after the war
The 14th and 15th Amendments were a result of the radical republicans, who Lincoln was able to keep at bay throughout his tenure. Unfortunately for southerners, they killed him.
You act as though Lincoln could have held back the radical republicans forever, he only slowed them down and would have eventually had to give way to Thaddeus Stevens or be at odds with his own party.
kek this homie aged like milk even without a war
If it were authentic, it would not be nearly as organized as the first one. There are members of team blue and team red in every city and every rural area, respectively, of every state. It wouldn't even be a war, but just an anarchic collapse of the federal government. The result would be a bunch of separate states that would be more focused on surviving than fighting each other.
If you actually had states facing off against each other, you would know it would have been organized by israelites. Why would a southern boy want to fight team blue in New York when there is plenty team blue in Atlanta?
The actual "civil war" is israelites versus whites and it's been happening since the country was founded. What do you think the War of 1812 was about? israelite Rothschild wanted a central bank of America.
>It's team blue vs team red
except for kansas and missouri who will begin border war 2: gorilla boogaloo because they are collectively incapable of letting that go
>2 minutes apart
powerful.
He looks like a methhead
He had a disease moron
It would be a mix of the finnish civil war. Serbian conflict with a splash of strategic level comparison to the hegemonic collapse of Rome
He hit the wall.
lol no one has the balls, especially in a time of mass surveillance. 3rd world shitholes like Syria end up in civil war because their governments don't have the knowledge/money to have tech snitching on all of it's citizens 24/7 like China, US, and EU do. Nor can they manage the sea of shills, honeypots, useful idiots, controlled opposition, or a population sedated into apathy by modern comforts and hyper-individualistic culture that breeds a "I don't care as long as I got mine" attitude.
This dumb thread is made every day, multiple times a day, for years. Nothing even happens, moron. Americans would have to be facing mass starvation, loss of power, and other calamatous events all at the same time to risk shit over esoteric ideals of liberty and other bullshit. Our system is effective enough to maintain enough quality of life to make people feel like they still have shit to lose, so good luck with your LARP
wishful thinking. if people are made homeless and hungry (and they will be) then the events will be unparalleled in recorded history.
Yugoslav wars on steroids
nicholas cage aged pretty well
The lines would not be nearly as clear as the previous Civil War, and it would be a lot more personal and less purely political in nature. You would have people murdering their neighbors, killing police officers, it would be chaos. If it does happen, I don't think you could really call it a war. It would just be widespread chaos.
Some areas of the continent will look more like Syria with relatively clear factions and territorial exchanges. Some areas will be more like Afghanistan where it's just a bunch of local militias that represent gang warfare more than anything else. Other places will be generally untouched simply because they're strategically irrelevant and not worth the hassle.
Whatever the case, I intend to go full blown warlord and capture as much farmland and oil sands as I possibly can.
In the Civil War, the winner was decided by industrial power.
Sit in an armchair, looking at the gameboard before the war even starts. Who will win? Obviously the North, which has 2x the population and 5x the industrial capacity. That's a simple raw calculation anyone could make.
In WW2, same deal. Sit down in an armchair and examine the two sides. Which side has more industrial power? It's obvious. So that side will win. In WW2 population numbers mattered less, and oil access mattered more.
These days, sit down at the game board. Which side will win?
Industrial production might not matter as much these days. I think it's more about
-- Your foreign allies
-- Your financial backing
-- Your access to nuclear weapons
Lots of nuclear weapons are stored in red states, but they don't have the keys to the vault, so to speak. If they could some how seize many of these weapons, they would be in business.
I think these days, one thing that's drastically needed is "willingness to fight", something that's in very short supply. I don't see many comfortable Americans eager to sign up for battlefield life. It might be the case of the wolf in the henhouse brings home the victory.
I think you also need access to two more factors
-- Elite managerial people to prosecute your endeavor. (We can see the disaster of Russia's invasion because they lacked good managerial oversight.)
-- Access within the currently existing intelligence apparatus. Realistically you're going to need some of those guys, because the power structure is so strong right now. They have everything studied and mapped out. They can create groups, dissolve groups, prosecute conflicts an ocean away. It's all been studied, categorized and labelled. You're going to need a piece of that
Did anyone ever notice how MASSIVE Lincoln's ears are?
he was an elf.
Big ears. Big legs. Big hands. Big feet. Big wiener. Simple as.
It would be a lot like that shopping mall video from Ukraine. Normie gays will still keep walking around pretending they have nothing to lose until a mortar rips off their legs. It'll be short and decisive in comparison to what we have witnessed in recent history.
the whole word would get involved in another us civil war
they want our resources
thats what all this is about
The middle eastern conflicts.
It would be comparable to the spanish civil war.
A heavily agitated and polarized population whipsaws between opposite extremes every election. Leftists constantly riot. Eventually they try to ban all other parties and the other parties and associated militias and military officers rebel. The leftists will do absolutely insane shit like rape nuns then burn them alive, and break into houses and kill entire families if they see a cross anywhere. The right will airdrop food into besieged leftist cities but nogs will eat it all. Eventually, the right wing will win and do the Christian thing and pardon all the leftists. In 50 years the leftists will own the schools and teach children that the conservatives were evil tyrants and the leftists were good boys who din do nuffin, and we'll be right back here again.
Is that basically the Spanish Civil War? Is there a non-pozzed rundown on it I could read?
PrepHole actually has some people who are redpilled on this specific topic. A lot of posts from Spaniards who’s grandfathers fought in the war. But idk about asking them right this second, there has been a leftist discord that’s been raiding the board for a couple months. Maybe check the archives from PrepHole.
>Eventually, the right wing will win and do the Christian thing and pardon all the leftists.
This mustn't be allowed to happen.
Revolution, there is nothing civil about genocide.
Lay siege to all cities, they starve to death, then kill the weakened remains and start the country over.
Will this decade be seen similarly to Bleeding Kansas or like the Years Of Lead that happened in Italy?
Literally no conflict would compare. There are more guns owned by American civilians than literally every military in the world combined, including the United States. There is actually, literally no comparable conflict.
The best we can do is imagine Rwanda with armed angry whites slaughtering israelites and everything else we don't like.
The whole "Presidency ages men" is only half true. A big part of it is that men's age when they become president is often when middle aged men start to look like old men (late 50's-early 60's).
Before /misc/- after /misc/
I dunno but I hope it ends in complete nuclear genocide of this fricking shithole
Israel would pick a winner. The people they didn't like wouldnt be allowed online because that's Israel's specialty, hacking.
basically everyone who goes past their breaking point will take others with them, then a bunch of utilities experts will explain to military veterans doing guerilla strikes where to hit the nation's infrastructure to disrupt everything from internet access to food and water supplies. shit would cause food riots and make what BLM did look not that bad in comparison.
nobody wants this to happen, even the would-be rebels. it's why it hasn't happened yet.
Non-countrymen.
Foreign enemy.
It should be avoided at all cost.
Just look at that squeaky voiced yankee b***h. Disgusting.
There will not be a second civil war, this is a fantasy basement dwellers with too much time on their hands have. If there was to be one you'd think it would have happened by now between George Floyd protest and Roe v Wade being overturned. No state is going to seriously challenge the might of the Federal government in a military conflict and if you think otherwise you desperately need to get off this website and go sniff fresh air
>MUH HECKIN PRESIDENTERINO WAS GONNA SEND THE Black folk BACK
To anyone moronic enough to believe Lincoln wasn't a complete Black person lover by 1865, read his last speech. If Lincoln survived Jim Crowe would outright not exist or it would be severely mitigated.