What was the reasoning behind the choice of gun for the warrior?

What was the reasoning behind the choice of gun for the warrior? Why did they decide to go with a non stabilized main gun that fires from 3 round clips? The warrior had 12 ready rounds before the gunner has to manually load more clips. I compare that to something like the Bradley that has 75 AP ready and 220 HE ready and it just doesn’t make sense

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it works without electronics and the bradly doesnt. Also stabilization was not a priority as these things rarely shot on the move anyway. Both stupid reasons but they went with it. CTAS is overly complicated and shows the other end of the spectrum.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >it works without electronics
      This isn’t important at all

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/litany-of-problems-reported-with-armys-stryker-vehicle/

        "The vehicle’s computers are too slow and overheat in desert temperatures or freeze up at critical moments, such as “when large units are moving at high speeds simultaneously” and overwhelm its sensors."

        seems pretty important

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >problems fixed with cooling units in 2011
          anyone with a subscription to seattle times deserves to die

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >9 years after its initial deployment

            I mean if you are not trying to see the argument might as wel close your eyes. Stabilization can bring problems and it often does. If there are little redeming factors in the mission set then there are little returns having them (with 90's tech).

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      wrong and wrong. A stabilizer is also valuable for shooting quickly after stopping rather than waiting for the gun to settle after a stop.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        why stop when you can shoot on the move? its a stupid argument. If you decide to stop with a stabelizer might as wel not have one...oh wait.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >stabilizers are perfectly accurate even at range
          >you'll never need to stop suddenly to dismount troops
          >you'll never need to stop and back up rapidly

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    WHY ARE YOU DUMB FOOLS POSTING IN A WARRIORTARD THREAD?

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >that picture
    >this thread again
    This Warriortard is one persistent sperg.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Summoning warriortard to come and try to defend this piece of shit

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Warriortard is the one continually making these shit threads.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No it’s the guy who defends warrior. Bradleytard made this thread

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Summoning warriortard to come and try to defend this piece of shit

          OP is warriortard you sperg gay.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It’s ours so I like it

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because fitting a decent number of people and moving faster than 40mph is important. Plus it's a far more powerful gun in a better protected chassis. Enjoy your ban.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >moving faster than 40mph is important.
      kek no it’s not

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >being more than 10mph slower than your MBT isn't a problem

        36mph on road is a joke, it's pathetic. Plus it's not like it's carrying a big armament, lots of troops or heavy protection, it's just slow.

        It wouldn't even be able to keep up with a challenger 2 lol

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It’s not a problem at all because abrams don’t March at top speed. By your logic the mig-25 is the best jet fighter there is

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Bradley doesn't cruise at it's top speed either retard lol Probably sub 30mph, humiliatingly slow.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I’d rather be a little slow than not be able to fire on the move, change ammo types rapidly, or have a manually adjusted only turret. You lost this one

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Having +45 -10 elevation is far more important than a stabiliser as combat in Ukraine has shown. Bradley would be cucked in Urban operations - it was during Iraq.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yea if the Bradley ever is at the base of a skyscraper and needs to shoot directly up we will call in the warriors. Other than that elevation is fine on Bradley. Bradley’s replacement will have this ability to deal with drones

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Bradley can't even shoot at the 1st floor (thats the second floor for you backwards Americans).

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It absolutely can. I’ll take you’re shit flinging as a concession

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >nooooooo warriortard said it couldn’t do thissss

          Didn't Bradley lose to Warrior the only time they went head to head for orders?

          no, the warrior has never been exported. Kuwait bought some but demanded that the turret be removed completely and replaced with an LAV-turret. The Bradley has sold more units and to more countries. The most recent Bradley purchase was this year. Croatia ordered nearly 90 of them

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Well no shit the Bradley is the second most exported western IFV behind the CV-90. Don’t reply to warriortard bait

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >The most recent Bradley purchase was this year. Croatia ordered nearly 90 of them
            source? I thought they were getting lynx

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              https://www.army-technology.com/news/croatia-armed-forces-to-acquire-89-bradley-fighting-vehicles/

              Well, here itnis in black and white for all to see. I’ve never read anything about the lynx even being offered to croatia. Perhaps you are retarded

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Kuwait bought some but demanded that the turret be removed completely and replaced with an LAV-turret

            Yeah, this combination beat Bradley

            p.s you are warrior trad, he's the flordia based shart guy who only posts from about 1pm onward GMT.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              So what are you arguing. The premise of the thread is that the warriors turret is shit and the fact that none were ever exported without ripping out the turret supports that fact. The Bradley beat out the warrior when both were offered to Saudi Arabia.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >So what are you arguing

                That Bradley is slow, carries too few troops, is poorly protected with a less lethal gun than Warrior while also being pretty ugly tbh. And no matter how many times you make this shitty thread, thats what the consensus will be. go shit yourself again, i'm bored to talking to a NEET.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What was the rationale behind the 6 men dismount team of the bradley anyway?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                And get the Bradley still outperforms the warrior on paper, in combat, and in export sales. I’m sorry you are so upset by the lackluster specifications of the warrior but that simply isn’t my problem

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It only outperforms the warrior because the warrior has the gimped turret. Had the British designed the weapon systems better the warrior would be better than the Bradley

                bradley has better optics, stabilizer, more ammo

                Also has a top tier ATGM and a smaller logistics footprint

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I’m sorry you are so upset

                And yet it's you making these threads lol

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                He makes the threads because warriortards like you exist on PrepHole. It’s fun to remind people how bad their favorite equipment is and have them attempt to defend it day in and day out.
                >w…we don’t even need a stabilized gun

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Nah, he couldn't bear to say sorry to starstreak so needed something new to do.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                bradley has better optics, stabilizer, more ammo

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Didn't Bradley lose to Warrior the only time they went head to head for orders?

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Cheapness. British army ALWAYS gets the cheapest and most primitive shit available. It's been this way since the 1930s.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    bongs are fucking stupid and haven't fought a real war in close to a century

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    god I hate the British

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >clip
    it's called a magazine idiots

Your email address will not be published.