What was the reasoning behind the choice of gun for the warrior? Why did they decide to go with a non stabilized main gun that fires from 3 round clips? The warrior had 12 ready rounds before the gunner has to manually load more clips. I compare that to something like the Bradley that has 75 AP ready and 220 HE ready and it just doesn’t make sense
it works without electronics and the bradly doesnt. Also stabilization was not a priority as these things rarely shot on the move anyway. Both stupid reasons but they went with it. CTAS is overly complicated and shows the other end of the spectrum.
>it works without electronics
This isn’t important at all
https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/litany-of-problems-reported-with-armys-stryker-vehicle/
"The vehicle’s computers are too slow and overheat in desert temperatures or freeze up at critical moments, such as “when large units are moving at high speeds simultaneously” and overwhelm its sensors."
seems pretty important
>problems fixed with cooling units in 2011
anyone with a subscription to seattle times deserves to die
>9 years after its initial deployment
I mean if you are not trying to see the argument might as wel close your eyes. Stabilization can bring problems and it often does. If there are little redeming factors in the mission set then there are little returns having them (with 90's tech).
wrong and wrong. A stabilizer is also valuable for shooting quickly after stopping rather than waiting for the gun to settle after a stop.
why stop when you can shoot on the move? its a stupid argument. If you decide to stop with a stabelizer might as wel not have one...oh wait.
>stabilizers are perfectly accurate even at range
>you'll never need to stop suddenly to dismount troops
>you'll never need to stop and back up rapidly
WHY ARE YOU DUMB FOOLS POSTING IN A WARRIORTARD THREAD?
>that picture
>this thread again
This Warriortard is one persistent sperg.
Summoning warriortard to come and try to defend this piece of shit
Warriortard is the one continually making these shit threads.
No it’s the guy who defends warrior. Bradleytard made this thread
OP is warriortard you sperg gay.
It’s ours so I like it
Because fitting a decent number of people and moving faster than 40mph is important. Plus it's a far more powerful gun in a better protected chassis. Enjoy your ban.
>moving faster than 40mph is important.
kek no it’s not
>being more than 10mph slower than your MBT isn't a problem
36mph on road is a joke, it's pathetic. Plus it's not like it's carrying a big armament, lots of troops or heavy protection, it's just slow.
It wouldn't even be able to keep up with a challenger 2 lol
It’s not a problem at all because abrams don’t March at top speed. By your logic the mig-25 is the best jet fighter there is
Bradley doesn't cruise at it's top speed either retard lol Probably sub 30mph, humiliatingly slow.
I’d rather be a little slow than not be able to fire on the move, change ammo types rapidly, or have a manually adjusted only turret. You lost this one
Having +45 -10 elevation is far more important than a stabiliser as combat in Ukraine has shown. Bradley would be cucked in Urban operations - it was during Iraq.
Yea if the Bradley ever is at the base of a skyscraper and needs to shoot directly up we will call in the warriors. Other than that elevation is fine on Bradley. Bradley’s replacement will have this ability to deal with drones
Bradley can't even shoot at the 1st floor (thats the second floor for you backwards Americans).
It absolutely can. I’ll take you’re shit flinging as a concession
>nooooooo warriortard said it couldn’t do thissss
no, the warrior has never been exported. Kuwait bought some but demanded that the turret be removed completely and replaced with an LAV-turret. The Bradley has sold more units and to more countries. The most recent Bradley purchase was this year. Croatia ordered nearly 90 of them
Well no shit the Bradley is the second most exported western IFV behind the CV-90. Don’t reply to warriortard bait
>The most recent Bradley purchase was this year. Croatia ordered nearly 90 of them
source? I thought they were getting lynx
https://www.army-technology.com/news/croatia-armed-forces-to-acquire-89-bradley-fighting-vehicles/
Well, here itnis in black and white for all to see. I’ve never read anything about the lynx even being offered to croatia. Perhaps you are retarded
>Kuwait bought some but demanded that the turret be removed completely and replaced with an LAV-turret
Yeah, this combination beat Bradley
p.s you are warrior trad, he's the flordia based shart guy who only posts from about 1pm onward GMT.
So what are you arguing. The premise of the thread is that the warriors turret is shit and the fact that none were ever exported without ripping out the turret supports that fact. The Bradley beat out the warrior when both were offered to Saudi Arabia.
>So what are you arguing
That Bradley is slow, carries too few troops, is poorly protected with a less lethal gun than Warrior while also being pretty ugly tbh. And no matter how many times you make this shitty thread, thats what the consensus will be. go shit yourself again, i'm bored to talking to a NEET.
What was the rationale behind the 6 men dismount team of the bradley anyway?
And get the Bradley still outperforms the warrior on paper, in combat, and in export sales. I’m sorry you are so upset by the lackluster specifications of the warrior but that simply isn’t my problem
It only outperforms the warrior because the warrior has the gimped turret. Had the British designed the weapon systems better the warrior would be better than the Bradley
Also has a top tier ATGM and a smaller logistics footprint
>I’m sorry you are so upset
And yet it's you making these threads lol
He makes the threads because warriortards like you exist on PrepHole. It’s fun to remind people how bad their favorite equipment is and have them attempt to defend it day in and day out.
>w…we don’t even need a stabilized gun
Nah, he couldn't bear to say sorry to starstreak so needed something new to do.
bradley has better optics, stabilizer, more ammo
Didn't Bradley lose to Warrior the only time they went head to head for orders?
Cheapness. British army ALWAYS gets the cheapest and most primitive shit available. It's been this way since the 1930s.
bongs are fucking stupid and haven't fought a real war in close to a century
god I hate the British
>clip
it's called a magazine idiots