kinda cringe not gonna lie but i love the fact that normies ans autists all over the world are united in the anticipation of a total genocide of all russian.
As to your question OP.
They are white and thus superior to russians and other nonwhites
they aren't much more white than the russians, but I understand what you're trying to say. I think it's more that they're being supplied, trained and fed intel by my the (mostly) white US
Zelensky was literally the choice of the Russian population of Ukraine in 2019 - if he's gone full Vatnick-genocide then God help you if the Chocolate Warlord was still in charge.
My friends in Ukraine don't fight for their President and don't consider him to be an avatar of their people and state. They're the people and they're the state. They aren't Russians who grovel so frequently that there is a permanent indent on their splinter-ridden knees. Unlike Russians, Ukrainians would rather be free and poor than rich slaves, unlike Russians whose utterly karmic reward is that they shall neither be rich nor free.
>Ukrainians would rather be free and poor than rich slaves,
If they are so free why were they disarmed(not allowed to have weapons) no second amendment now being forced to fight trained military men of russia. If they hate russia so much why are they using ak47s rather than m16s or m4s?
Not to mention they overthrew their government with nothing but their bare hands on three fucking occasions since 1991 - the only 'bare arms' they needed.
>A license is required to own firearms, and a citizen may be issued a license if that person:
is 25 years of age for rifle ownership, 21 years of age for smoothbore weapon ownership, 18 years of age for cold or pneumatic weapon ownership;
has no criminal record;
has no history of domestic violence;
has no mental illness or history of mental illness;
has a good reason (target shooting, hunting, collection).
Once a license is issued, all guns must be kept unloaded and in a safe.
This is not freedom. >we overthrew the government with muh heckin bare hands
Maybe they should throw down their weapons and go bare handed then.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>criminal record >history of domestic violence >mental illness or history of mental illness
Which one is you?
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
All of them but I'm american and i still own lots of guns and they are loaded at all times with a hundred backup magazines that are also full and i don't own a safe to keep them in they are on the wall and in every corner and behind every door in my house. I even keep 2 in my truck.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
so if you ever had depression, for example, you can't ever own guns?
if is mental illness considered something more "permanent" such as schizophrenia
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>has no criminal record; >has no history of domestic violence; >has no mental illness or history of mental illness;
All of these are legitimate reasons to prohibit someone from owning a firearm
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
I remember reading somewhere that the most consistent warning factor among mass shooters is a history of domestic violence so in theory it's even more pertinent than general criminal history.
>They have to be real Otherwise Russians would get genocided by all of their neighbours + US.
The only reason they aren't going all in on the russians is simply gaining money the longer it goes on. Plus the fact that when WW3 is declared there will be a world wide boog and every single sonofabitch oligarchy elite will be booged on. Nukes are fake.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>they
Chinks would be at the gates of Moscow right now. This has 0 to do with America.makong money or not. The moment Russia showed their army is completely worthless if nukes weren't real, everyone from China to Khazakhstan to ducking Estonia would be pulling chunks out of Russia's still alive "corpse".
Existential wars unite people and produce miracles, as the 1948 and 6 Day War with Israel showed - doubly so when their opponents are shambolic dictatorships at war with themselves and their allies as much as each other.
Ukrainians assume they are going to be killed, or someone close to them will be killed if Russia take over, not to mention that their language, cultural identity, in short foundational parts of their personalities and daily lives, would likewise be extinguished, something that practically would be death. That's the sort of thing that makes you quit demanding bribes or getting kickbacks - not going to be much kickbacks if you and your kids are all going to be tossed into ditches half-filled with rainwater inside a bodybag.
They're not. Most of the original army is dead, and the billions we're sending in equipment and ammo is all that is keeping them afloat. That and many troops/mercs.
Because Ukraine is fielding a basically competent and professional army with all the finest equipment NATO nation taxpayers can provide; while at this point Russia is mostly using (increasingly old, medically unfit, and drunk/drugged out) conscripts with less than a month of training, equipping them with shit that was out of date and obsolete before you were born, and doesn't even have the logistical chops to keep them fully stocked on the obsolete crap.
1. A massive population that it isn’t afraid to draft. Ukraine has a lot more boots on the ground than Russia does, and will gain a lot more in the future, even if they are sized for women and children
2. A decent amount of equipment. Mostly left over from Ukraine’s time in the USSR, some donated. Although Ukraine is outgunned by Russia, it is able to hit back.
>enemy vastly overestimated its own ability >foreign support >knowledge that they're fighting an existential conflict where defeat means genocide by the steppemutt rape horde
>US maphax >US gibbs of food, fuel, logistics trucks, ammo recruit training in safe nato countries allows you to facetank the entire cruise missile arsenal of russia without short term damages to critical sectors like food and fuel distribution. >motivated defenders >russian military flaws and strict c&c doctrine degrades their fighting abilities in combined arms assaults
Ukraine is like the cpu in rts games right now, attacking econ doesn't do anything because they get free gold, they get free recruitment slots so attacking buildings pointless, and they have map hack on.
Seems like 'the insecure small dick' thing has riled up a lot of controversy, how could this be? How could it possibly annoy people who aren't ashamed?
Contrary to popular belief, the Donbabwe fighting leading up to the invasion was much more intense than media had been letting on. By the time the actual invasion started proper, the Ukrainians had a large pool of experience to draw from and had been planning for the full invasion for nearly a decade.
>Why didn't Donbabwe have the same thing?
Because the separatists were a mixed bag of disorganized rabble and some Russian soldiers that "just got lost". For political reasons, Russia had to ignore any sort of knowledge that could have been gained. And because the conflicts were more sporadic patterns of >Russian soldiers "get lost" and take over a single town >leaves it to separatists >separatists undersupplied and expect Russian help >Russia provides radio silence >separatists get massacred >repeat
It meant that all these Donbabwe militia groups never had the means to build up an experienced force. It was basically a new crop of radical weirdos every year.
kinda cringe not gonna lie but i love the fact that normies ans autists all over the world are united in the anticipation of a total genocide of all russian.
As to your question OP.
They are white and thus superior to russians and other nonwhites
they aren't much more white than the russians, but I understand what you're trying to say. I think it's more that they're being supplied, trained and fed intel by my the (mostly) white US
for the last time: Lend-Lease.
Ukraine isnt engaging with lend lease because they are getting so much free shit
>free
ahahahahah
>dying on a foreign soil for a garden gnome is LE GOOD
So, literally what Ukrainians are doing with Zelensky?
Zelensky was literally the choice of the Russian population of Ukraine in 2019 - if he's gone full Vatnick-genocide then God help you if the Chocolate Warlord was still in charge.
My friends in Ukraine don't fight for their President and don't consider him to be an avatar of their people and state. They're the people and they're the state. They aren't Russians who grovel so frequently that there is a permanent indent on their splinter-ridden knees. Unlike Russians, Ukrainians would rather be free and poor than rich slaves, unlike Russians whose utterly karmic reward is that they shall neither be rich nor free.
>Ukrainians would rather be free and poor than rich slaves,
If they are so free why were they disarmed(not allowed to have weapons) no second amendment now being forced to fight trained military men of russia. If they hate russia so much why are they using ak47s rather than m16s or m4s?
This is the most retarded comment on the whole board right now. I hope you're proud of yourself.
Not an argument.
Answer the question.
Should I teach you how to breathe as well?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_law_in_Ukraine
Seems to be relatively relaxed gun laws to me.
Not to mention they overthrew their government with nothing but their bare hands on three fucking occasions since 1991 - the only 'bare arms' they needed.
if the US got invaded, do you think Democrats would be tossing civvies rifles too? it's funny to think about.
>10 million rounds of ammunition and unknown number of RPGs have been handed out to civilians
God Bless.
>A license is required to own firearms, and a citizen may be issued a license if that person:
is 25 years of age for rifle ownership, 21 years of age for smoothbore weapon ownership, 18 years of age for cold or pneumatic weapon ownership;
has no criminal record;
has no history of domestic violence;
has no mental illness or history of mental illness;
has a good reason (target shooting, hunting, collection).
Once a license is issued, all guns must be kept unloaded and in a safe.
This is not freedom.
>we overthrew the government with muh heckin bare hands
Maybe they should throw down their weapons and go bare handed then.
>criminal record
>history of domestic violence
>mental illness or history of mental illness
Which one is you?
All of them but I'm american and i still own lots of guns and they are loaded at all times with a hundred backup magazines that are also full and i don't own a safe to keep them in they are on the wall and in every corner and behind every door in my house. I even keep 2 in my truck.
so if you ever had depression, for example, you can't ever own guns?
if is mental illness considered something more "permanent" such as schizophrenia
>has no criminal record;
>has no history of domestic violence;
>has no mental illness or history of mental illness;
All of these are legitimate reasons to prohibit someone from owning a firearm
I remember reading somewhere that the most consistent warning factor among mass shooters is a history of domestic violence so in theory it's even more pertinent than general criminal history.
if zelensky magically disappeared tomorrow a poroshenko would take his place who would want to nuke moscow tomorrow instead of just expelling them
Don't get my hopes up. All these turdworld slavs will finally stop shitting up this board.
Nukes aren't real, but I don't expect redditors to understand that
They have to be real. Otherwise Russians would get genocided by all of their neighbours + US.
>They have to be real Otherwise Russians would get genocided by all of their neighbours + US.
The only reason they aren't going all in on the russians is simply gaining money the longer it goes on. Plus the fact that when WW3 is declared there will be a world wide boog and every single sonofabitch oligarchy elite will be booged on. Nukes are fake.
>they
Chinks would be at the gates of Moscow right now. This has 0 to do with America.makong money or not. The moment Russia showed their army is completely worthless if nukes weren't real, everyone from China to Khazakhstan to ducking Estonia would be pulling chunks out of Russia's still alive "corpse".
then what is stopping NATO from cleansing the russian step of problems?
lol what?
Their president is gnomish
Ukraine isn't foreign soil for Ukrainians. It is for Russians, which is why the Donbass Genocide must be carried out in full.
zelensky isnt a tsar like putin is you drip, hes liked because he leaves his fucking bunker and meets his people
>he leaves his fucking bunker and meets his people
Where? In Brooklyn? Aka where he stayed over the holidays while 16-year olds got fragged by arty?
there's several videos of him going to kharkiv right after it was recaptured
And Kherson
nafo is funny because it's an obvious psyop to make vatniks seethe and waste their resources on internet dumbasses
>twitter shitposting HAS to be a psyop
Why does everything have to be some concerted effort with you schizos
What will it take to perma ban you?
forced service or jail time
Everyone in Russia is a reservist, same as Ukraine. What a retarded thing to say.
>What makes them such an effective army?
Diversity is their greatest strength.
Can't be. That's Russia's forte.
By far the worse meme I've seen in years
Calling card for pedos
Existential wars unite people and produce miracles, as the 1948 and 6 Day War with Israel showed - doubly so when their opponents are shambolic dictatorships at war with themselves and their allies as much as each other.
Ukrainians assume they are going to be killed, or someone close to them will be killed if Russia take over, not to mention that their language, cultural identity, in short foundational parts of their personalities and daily lives, would likewise be extinguished, something that practically would be death. That's the sort of thing that makes you quit demanding bribes or getting kickbacks - not going to be much kickbacks if you and your kids are all going to be tossed into ditches half-filled with rainwater inside a bodybag.
lots of cannon fodder and a good recruitment staff
They're united against a force that is determined to destroy them. They're an effective army because they were attacked.
They're not. Most of the original army is dead, and the billions we're sending in equipment and ammo is all that is keeping them afloat. That and many troops/mercs.
Their love of trickle down economics and same sex marriage
Nothing, Russia's army is lead by a bunch of sycophants who keep their positions by lying and playing the "game.
Eight years of sorting their military out from being whatever the fuck it was in 2014 into an actual fighting force.
Can't forget bombing bombass, Donetsk children deserved it.
Because Ukraine is fielding a basically competent and professional army with all the finest equipment NATO nation taxpayers can provide; while at this point Russia is mostly using (increasingly old, medically unfit, and drunk/drugged out) conscripts with less than a month of training, equipping them with shit that was out of date and obsolete before you were born, and doesn't even have the logistical chops to keep them fully stocked on the obsolete crap.
You just love imagining other men's penises, don't you.
I have a wife of 9 years and 4 children, live on a farm.
>muh compensation of small penis size
moron.
Do you beat the wife, the kids, or all of them? You just said you have a history of domestic violence.
They don't step out of line.
>history of violence = current violence
You gonna save the day?
>tips fedora
1. A massive population that it isn’t afraid to draft. Ukraine has a lot more boots on the ground than Russia does, and will gain a lot more in the future, even if they are sized for women and children
2. A decent amount of equipment. Mostly left over from Ukraine’s time in the USSR, some donated. Although Ukraine is outgunned by Russia, it is able to hit back.
>enemy vastly overestimated its own ability
>foreign support
>knowledge that they're fighting an existential conflict where defeat means genocide by the steppemutt rape horde
upset?
Superior equipment and morale, not to mention ukranians know what they're fighting for whereas the whipped russian conscript does not
They aren't. They're just buffered with a large population, infinite arms and money from the west, and an incompetent opponent.
You seem to be mistaking them for Russia
wait and see holhol, we're not using even 5% of our power, the gloves are coming off, you see putins master plan, it will be over soon...
>What makes them such an effective army?
Nazis never know when to quit.
Retarded enemies, unlimited gibs and endless propaganda. Other than that they're shithead slavs just like the vatniks.
IDK the knowledge that losing means becoming a russian rape fortress is more than convincing for most
> doesn't want to get raped so goes to war to get killed AND raped
Smart.
>US maphax
>US gibbs of food, fuel, logistics trucks, ammo recruit training in safe nato countries allows you to facetank the entire cruise missile arsenal of russia without short term damages to critical sectors like food and fuel distribution.
>motivated defenders
>russian military flaws and strict c&c doctrine degrades their fighting abilities in combined arms assaults
deep down you know it to be true, you wish putin had the charisma that mans has
>Janny cleared out all the shitposts
Are jannies actually becoming... good? Wtf is going on
inst there a webm of them in a furry reddit dog outfit at a suited convention?
Ukraine is like the cpu in rts games right now, attacking econ doesn't do anything because they get free gold, they get free recruitment slots so attacking buildings pointless, and they have map hack on.
Seems like 'the insecure small dick' thing has riled up a lot of controversy, how could this be? How could it possibly annoy people who aren't ashamed?
Contrary to popular belief, the Donbabwe fighting leading up to the invasion was much more intense than media had been letting on. By the time the actual invasion started proper, the Ukrainians had a large pool of experience to draw from and had been planning for the full invasion for nearly a decade.
Why didn't Donbabwe have the same thing? Or were the seperatists the best troops Russia had and they burned them all up at Mariupol?
>Why didn't Donbabwe have the same thing?
Because the separatists were a mixed bag of disorganized rabble and some Russian soldiers that "just got lost". For political reasons, Russia had to ignore any sort of knowledge that could have been gained. And because the conflicts were more sporadic patterns of
>Russian soldiers "get lost" and take over a single town
>leaves it to separatists
>separatists undersupplied and expect Russian help
>Russia provides radio silence
>separatists get massacred
>repeat
It meant that all these Donbabwe militia groups never had the means to build up an experienced force. It was basically a new crop of radical weirdos every year.
100 billion dollars of military aid and intelligence support does wonders.
western weapons and intel
Their funds aren't being diverted to yachts
what effectiveness?
they're getting fucked up as bad as the russians.
neither is remotely close to professional levels
Meanwhile in Muscovy, the men are being pumped full of cum for nothing while their women whore themselves to tourists for handfuls of yuan.
They're trying not to get exterminated, a powerful motivator.
>What makes them such an effective army?
An incompetent enemy.
Oh you've gotta love some Russian cum-guzzler having the brass balls to talk about cruelty.
>Pidorashka calling anyone else a chud
lol with a pinch of lmao.
Russian incompetence