What is the strategic role of Taco Tuesday in damage control of a vessel that arabs and chinese assured me got hit with a chinese missile?

What is the strategic role of Taco Tuesday in damage control of a vessel that arabs and chinese assured me got hit with a chinese missile?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Never understood the Arab and Chinese hostility to the post war international order considering their countries would be among the fastest to completely implode if cheap, safe international shipping were to fall apart. The process won't be good for anyone but their countries are absolutely, existentially fricked when the imports stop.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >What is the strategic role of Taco Tuesday
      unironically return fire in the internet propaganda war
      headlines are as important as artillery strikes here

      envy
      since they can never bring their civilisations up to our level, they must bring others down to theirs

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >they must bring others down to theirs
        Just about the only country that could retain a reasonably high standard of living should global trade infrastructure collapse is the US.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >only the US
          All of North America would be fine. If only because Canada and Mexico would be finally annexed as territories.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No, never Mexico. Please, too many here already.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              If we annexed Mexico it would actually be far more feasible to build a wall to keep the people who are actually coming into the country out at a relatively low cost. Mexicans are conservative like you anyway.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >it would actually be far more feasible to build a wall to keep the people who are actually coming into the country out
                Build a wall along Mexico's southern border to keep the South Americans out? kek, that might actually work

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >the only country that could retain a reasonably high standard of living should global trade infrastructure collapse is the US
          yes, and?
          they don't care

          look at just about any mudslime nation that isn't Saudi Arabia, UAE, or Dubai, and you'll find the same setup.
          the leaders and generals keep the population subjugated and amass riches for themselves. they bribe the imams and ayatollahs to keep the population toiling to feed the state, produce babies (missionaries and soldiers), and mutually reinforce the indoctrination.
          their religious leaders tell them to ignore dunya (the temporal) because their reward is in akhirat (the afterlife). and they believe it willingly, because how else to withstand the suffering of being subjugated turdies?
          thus their hate is directed towards the infidels, who are indubitably the cause of everything wrong that happens to them. it's a win-win solution: destroy the infidels and you will get the riches they're withholding from you, even if it doesn't match expectations, do not be troubled, your true reward is in the afterlife. and if you die, so much the better, for you are waging jihad (holy war), you will die a shaheed (martyr) and receive your spiritual reward faster.

          the whole lash-up is a corrupt and fascist regime equipped for fanatical expansion, militant and otherwise. because it was finely designed as such, since 600 AD.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            In the grim darkness of arab countries there is only jihad and social stagnation.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I would like to point this post out as one of the most concise and accurate descriptions of islamic conquest mindset I have seen.

            it affects all of them. turkish, bosnian, arab. the moderate ones are just pretending to be moderate.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >cheap, safe international shipping
      Pirates are an annoyance but private security has done more to stop them than the entire US navy division in Djibouti. The first and major line of defense is ships fighting back, not naval vessels that take hours to reach the ship.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Noone's talking about dipshit starving somalian pirates. What America is keeping the seas safe from is legit privateers backed by state actors. Like literal frigates armed with serious weaponry. good luck defending your cargo ship from a privateering FREMM with half a dozen burned out grunts and serbians with some rifles and at most a GPMG.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The essential function the US navy serves on that front is capping what pirates are able to get away with using at a level below what private security forces can repel, because any pirate group with a warship capable of forcing private security to stand down is going to eat a cruise missile and everyone knows it, so they stick to upjumped motorboats.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I think both the threat to international shipping posed by the Houthis and the ability of even large navies like the U.S. Navy to eradicate it are overstated. For the first part, the economic benefits of sea trade compared to air and land/rail are so extreme that it doesn't make much of a difference if ships "take the long way around" on a global or macro scale. Generally speaking, attacks against shipping lanes (even at choke points) divert traffic rather than stop traffic, causing temporary dislocation and a mild increase in costs. For the second part, large navies have also pretty much always struggled against this going back to the British Empire and the Barbary pirates.

      What I think is going on... is that the fighting in the Red Sea isn't necessarily about "Israel" or "trade" that much. Or there's a larger game being played around it. The U.S. wants to create a united anti-Iran front that includes Saudi Arabia, which would also pull Saudi Arabia away from China. That seems to involve an integrated air-defense system that includes regional states, Gulfies, Israel, with the U.S. in the center of it. I think that's probably the real, deep, underlying strategic reason why the U.S. is spending all this money sailing ships around and expending munitions on these Houthi missiles and drones, it's to demonstrate that the U.S. is not going anywhere and that it can commit and has capabilities in the region in case Saudi Arabia is attacked by Iran.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No one ever struggled against the Barbary pirates. It's just that the cost of actually eradicating them outweighed the cost of paying the bribe.
        They later got destroyed anyway.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It was funny when they tried it on newborn America and they just sailed into ported and started murdering locals and burning shit down, instead. Been killing durkas almost since day one.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            This was right and proper, none of that silly nation building you saw at Afghanistan, you keep killing them until they either start to behave or get wiped out. And if needs be you send people to murder their leaders in case they are protected by other countries.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What you don't realize is that there are a grand total of two routes, the red sea and the horn of africa, and "taking the long way around" means being subject to south africa which is sliding ever further to being a failed state. If both become pirate havens, trade stops.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The problem with the Arabs is that we overthrew a lot of their governments and installed evil dictators (or turned a blind eye to it) to keep out commies. Also Israel. Also our messy liberation wars.

      The Chinese are scared shitless of what happened to the Soviet Union and they resent us for trying to change them and tell them how to live their lives. Also Xi has a bug up his ass about it especially, moreso than the rest of the CCP. They're really paranoid about losing power though.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >The problem with the Arabs is that we overthrew a lot of their governments and installed evil dictators (or turned a blind eye to it) to keep out commies
        No, you didn't. Who did the US overthrow in Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia?

        Thinking the world has problems because of US interventions is just a even gayer form of American exceptionalism. It's a very effective type of narrative for black propaganda against Americans because it appeals to their pre-disposition to think the whole world revolve around them and starts and ends with the United States.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      China is literally the world's biggest economy, they'd survive. As for the rest of the world, they're all joining BRICS. People are tired of being bullied by the EU and US.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >I'm tired of getting bullied by US and EU so I'd rather get bullied by China with their debt traps.
        Lol.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yes. Chinese serve China, US and EU serve Israel. Simple as.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            They also serve Apple.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        BRICS probably won't hold. The founding nations are deeply flawed.
        >B is...B
        >R can't overcome a much weaker neighbor and now has to shovel out gold to obtain munitions
        >I is a diseased hell of shit and rape
        >C is on its way to demographic hell
        >additionally I and C are likely to murder each other
        >S is doing a Zimbabwe right now
        The whole system is built on tough guys who put up facades of large military parades, soldiers getting whipped by officers, and "superpower by 2xxx" without much to back it up.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >>C is on its way to demographic hell
          No country in the history of the world ever collapsed from an aging population. What destroys countries is having their populations replaced by those who don't hold the same values as the natives. This applies most to the West.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >No country in the history of the world ever collapsed from an aging population
            No country in history has had an aging population and a fertility rate below replacement level.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >No country in history has had an aging population and low birth rates
              Factually wrong.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The chart you posted is listed as deaths in conflicts since 1400 which is not the same as population growth rates. Not sure what you're trying to prove here.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                how much did the german population grow from 1914-1918, 1939-1945? how was the population growth in the soviet union during ww2?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I don't know
                See for yourself
                https://www.statista.com/statistics/1066918/population-germany-historical/

                Still not sure what this is supposed to prove though.
                The topic is low birth rates and aging populations. Not the absolute number of deaths from wars across all of history.
                You can kill off half the country like the soviets did, but if the birthrate is high it'll come back in a decade or two.
                But that's not what you posted, which is simply just how many people died overall as a consequence of war since the 1400s.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >https://www.statista.com/statistics/1066918/population-germany-historical/
                you claimed no country ever had negative fertility and ageing population, the link you posted proves you wrong. in ww1 and ww2 young germans died in droves, which made the population older and the birthrate tanked like crazy. yet germany still exists.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                oh you sweet idiotic child
                of course the birthrates are going to tank if a war happens. that's how wars work (also I'm not that anon)
                what's unique in this situation is that china's birthrates are falling below replacement levels in peacetime. and it's going to be a multi decade long process because of their stupid one child policy (meaning it has nothing to do with a war)
                if they also happen to have a war on top of that, then they would be doubly fricked.

                also, nobody is saying that china isn't going to exist 100 years from now.
                what a low replacement level means is that china is going to go from a population of 1.1 billion people or whatever they have now to maybe 700 million people in 50 years.
                which is still enough to keep china still existing as the second most populous country in the world, but their economy will most definitely not be growing during that time in the same way japan's hasn't done much since the 90s and so whatever dreams of being a superpower will disappear along with that

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Overall, your graph shows a long-term trend of a total increase in population with short drops due to disasters, not long-term decline. German population growth returned immediately after the wars ended, ameliorating the effects of the drop. We're talking about a long-term systemic decline brought on by the persistent downward pressures of women's education, birth control, and general national development. These morons saying China will cease to exist as a functional state are engaging in wishful thinking at best and are outright lying to you/themselves at worst. However, you need to be a special kind of moron to think that a population halving by end-of-century won't have severe negative consequences for government finance, pensions, productivity, etc.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Chinas problem is that they got old before they got rich. Their decline is also far sharper than any we have previously seen.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Chinas problem is that they got old before they got rich.
                I don't know if this will be a huge issue. If China has more and more young people increasingly working in high-paying service sectors like tech, it will eventually turn into a fairly rich country when all of the old industrial workers eventually die off.
                >also
                >/k/ - Geopolitics and International Economics

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                a trend is not 100% guaranteed future. making a child takes 9 months so this trend can be reversed in a year. xi will order mating and 10 children families and then you will have 10 billion chinese people by 2050. thats how quick this can be turned around.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                But what's the alternative? Just endless population growth? You have to stop somewhere. It all comes across the equivalent of someone down in the hole from losing bets and gambling going "I need to gamble more to get out of it". It all sounds like a ponzi scheme. People are also aware of the absolute unadultered bullshit wool over the eyes LIES that we were told over and over from economist and corporate types about globalization. So very reasonably people are a little suspicious when the same types of people who profit off bloated populations (because it means more workers so less wages, more diverse workers so less chance of unionization, more consumers of your goods domestically) tell us
                >Oh yeah man this'll be great for you everybody benefits!

                People are not enlisting, because it's a bad career choice and not paid well. You can earn a frick ton of more money in the free market for nearly shit jobs like being a McDonald's cashier.

                Not everyone is this super hardcore right wing turd, that believes in the superiority of Prussian drills and ridiculous amounts of symbolic gesture like marching in formation.

                I wouldn't underestimate how much optics can matter. Nobody is going to not enlist purely because of diversity is our strength garbage, but it's not going to motivate anyone either and it'll be an added incentive not to. You're right that economics are a primary motivator, and like so many things nowadays they're entitled as shit with wanting enlistment without the benefits to motivate it. More than some LGBTBBQ poster it's the complete collapse in faith in any institution right now that makes anyone look at the military and go "Why should I be your Black person when you're going to chew me up, spit me out with nothing to gain unless I took a good MOS for marketability private sector?"

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What the frick are you talking about gay people?!
                People have the constitutional right to frick whoever they wanna frick, and be whoever they wannabe. That's not some propaganda bullshit, but one of the pillars of this country. Everyone has the right to serve their country without repressions or fearing discrimination. The military makes sure of that and it's one of their missions.

                Excluding some people would be a fricking embarrassment. Nobody would fight for a freedom, they're excluded from.
                So stfu up about your anti gay talking points like a confused Vatnik.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you sound like a gay and your shit's all fricked up

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Germany still exists
                The 3rd Reich does not exist though. A Chinese collapse won't make China disappear but it will kill the CCP

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're like one of the same 3 or 5 CCCP shills in this board ain't you you little commie frick. I keep seeing these same bullshit arguments in defense of Communist China where the asiatic takes the most literal definition of what the other NEET posted and sticks to it no matter how corrected he gets.

                See you in the inevitable thread about Chinese hyper-meme missiles.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So what war is China involved in that's keeping down the fertility rates?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The war against multiple endangered species.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Fair enough, carry on.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Last time I checked at least in US most hispanics become americanized quite fast, a lot of pro-western posts here are the children or grandchildren of latino migrants, besides, who better than a brown to know how to deal with problematic browns >:D

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No country in the world has ever had to deal with population aging before.

            Last time I checked at least in US most hispanics become americanized quite fast, a lot of pro-western posts here are the children or grandchildren of latino migrants, besides, who better than a brown to know how to deal with problematic browns >:D

            Precedent to this too
            >1920's Italians (brown) come over by the millions
            >1940's their kids enlist en masse to go back to Italy and murder their former countrymen.
            Also, Rome and auxilia but whatever.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Bro trust me man fricking halving your population in 60 years will totally work out. 700,000,000 less people buying things and producing will definitely not decimate your industry and GDP. Not a chance.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >BRICS
        Brazil is literally only known for troony hookers.
        Russia is in the midst of losing a war with the weakest country in Europe, and submitted to be publicly humiliated by a fat asiatic for artillery shells.
        India is a shithole, and fricking hates China.
        China's economy and demographics are crumbling in real time, and fricking hates India.
        South Africa are so fricking stupid they can't even boil water, and they survive on handouts from the anglosphere they resent but envy.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Anon BRICS was a meme invented by investment advisors trying to bring western capitals to some underdeveloped markets, if you go beyond the anecdotic tales or even the non-critically accepted data cooked by these countries you will see the entire faccade breaking apart, how can you call a world power countries where a major chunk of underage population die of gut parasites and have eyesight issues due malnutrition? These idiots falsisfy the information sent to UN and the WEF but are so dumb they ignore these indicators. It's like NK pretending to be a developed nation qhen you can see from orbit they are a darkened shithole.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >People

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >China is literally the world's biggest economy

        If you believe Red Chinamen GDP numbers you deserve to be ripped off doing business with them. Subprime on crack and One Child Policy chickens are coming home to roost.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          NTA but I would have asked him to post the % of his portfolio in Evergrande Group, kek.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        China survives by the simple blessing of the global maintenance of the laws of the ocean
        Its navy could not support or defend its own shipping

        Sooner thurdies wake up to this fact, homies will behave

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Vai te foder, comuna cuzão.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Baseado, senhor.
          >(suggestions for a better translation are eagerly solicited)

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Brazilian imageboards translate Based as Baseado because the joke is that its a literal translation that makes no sense. Similar things apply to words like Anon (Anão, Portuguese word for dwarf), Touhou (Torrão, a type of hardened dry rock) etc

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Biggest economy
        >losing up to 40% productivity in some sectors
        >begging for foreign investments
        >Real Estate development/finance cratering
        >RMB losing value
        >BRI initiative stalled where it hasn't already fallen apart leaving nations howling mad
        >record unemployment with no jobs available
        >manufacturing tanking
        >sanctions getting tighter
        >alienated the entire Asian-Pacific basin
        >actively scared off by Taiwan in recent exercises
        >Nuclear Arsenal as much as 60% combat ineffective
        >aircraft carriers have to be dragged from harbor
        >"Next Gen" fighters locked by Indian SU-30s and Taiwanese F-16s
        >92 trillion yuan defecit
        >still behind U.S. in GDP
        Yeah, biggest economy...

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/NB0OlgL.jpeg

      I think both the threat to international shipping posed by the Houthis and the ability of even large navies like the U.S. Navy to eradicate it are overstated. For the first part, the economic benefits of sea trade compared to air and land/rail are so extreme that it doesn't make much of a difference if ships "take the long way around" on a global or macro scale. Generally speaking, attacks against shipping lanes (even at choke points) divert traffic rather than stop traffic, causing temporary dislocation and a mild increase in costs. For the second part, large navies have also pretty much always struggled against this going back to the British Empire and the Barbary pirates.

      What I think is going on... is that the fighting in the Red Sea isn't necessarily about "Israel" or "trade" that much. Or there's a larger game being played around it. The U.S. wants to create a united anti-Iran front that includes Saudi Arabia, which would also pull Saudi Arabia away from China. That seems to involve an integrated air-defense system that includes regional states, Gulfies, Israel, with the U.S. in the center of it. I think that's probably the real, deep, underlying strategic reason why the U.S. is spending all this money sailing ships around and expending munitions on these Houthi missiles and drones, it's to demonstrate that the U.S. is not going anywhere and that it can commit and has capabilities in the region in case Saudi Arabia is attacked by Iran.

      The problem with the Arabs is that we overthrew a lot of their governments and installed evil dictators (or turned a blind eye to it) to keep out commies. Also Israel. Also our messy liberation wars.

      The Chinese are scared shitless of what happened to the Soviet Union and they resent us for trying to change them and tell them how to live their lives. Also Xi has a bug up his ass about it especially, moreso than the rest of the CCP. They're really paranoid about losing power though.

      Chinese benefit from the USN keeping the lanes safe. You thinking they're gleefully hoping you'll fail is literally just your own neocon brainrot taking hold.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        CCP needs an external enemy, the higher ups more often than not would prefer the machine to stay relatively well tuned, but they will jump at the chance to talk down their geopolitical rivals if the opportunity presents by itself, your enemy's bad news is the new oppium of the masses.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        As I said, the problem is that China is an authoritarian dystopia and their leader, who has consolidated power to disenfranchise the rest of the politburo, is a staunch nationalist who is making emotional decisions to be strong and independent of American influence.

        They want Taiwan. They dislike it as a symbol of freedom from their autocracy. That's why they killed Hong Kong. They're willing to take it if they think they can get away with it.

        That's one of the dangers of this election: one candidate has taken Chinese bribes in the past (despite rhetoric) and is ope by averse to the idea of fighting other people's wars.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Never understood the Arab and Chinese hostility to the post war international order
      Racial chauvinists (even where that doesn't make sense) who haven't stopped seething about their long-vanished glory days. It's like when a Greek starts rambling about being the founder of western civilization and you tell him to just give you an extra side of tzatziki sauce.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Arabs are literally moronic, the whole region averages like 80IQ and Yemen in particular is like 65.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        do you really believe anyone in yemen would do IQ tests? do you think they have doctors running around there doing IQ tests with the people?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Americans introduced standardized IQ tests in their schools 50 years ago for zero benefit and thats all these frickin suburban basement nerds talk about since 10 years ago in this has-been Burmese clay modeling forum.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      These are nations with deep inferiority complexes and very low IQ

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Jews and homosexuals, that's why.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i never understood why cargo ships dont all just have 4 50 cals on tripods on them

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Never understood the Arab and Chinese hostility to the post war international order

      Non-European resentment and envy that they didn't take man to the moon + Communism. Red-Green alliance was always a thing, picrel. When have you ever known Sino-Soviets to care about profits or 'staying in the Red' beyond spilling blood profligately for ideological reasons?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Listen to mearsheimer. The post war international "rules based" order is just newspeak for American dominance. This is clearly at odds with the survival of the Russian and Chinese states.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        2/10

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Stop importing Black folk into every country on earth and people wouldn't hate you, simple as really

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >7,000 miles away from Mexico
    >tacos

    hmmmm

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I dated a mexican once. She lived right next to a taco place in mexico city and we had tacos al pastor and carnitas a lot. Now that I'm back in the US there is a taco place that serves the exact same legit mexican tacos and they are just as good.

      The chefs are probably mexican is what I'm getting at.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This is the immigrant success story the demoralizers don't want us to see.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Was she good on the sack?

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    what the frick??
    those chinese posts were lying!?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'm still convinced that it was because the hoothis apparently used a chink ashm to do it. Which means that chink ashms are shit and don't work.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Or, you know, they just randomly launched that shit in the general direction of where they thought the CBG was, and ende dup missing by so much that neither the missile nor the CBG ever detected each other.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Given the amount of chink shilling and the "investigation" they did when the Captain cross posted a video. I doubt that.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Its good for morale, being allegedly sunk is hard
    >That homosexual thurdie never got me any photos of the wreck either after I asked nicely

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Two- carrier Anon here. The joke is that Taco Tuesday ALWAYS happens on a carrier. It's a modestly clever way of saying nothing happened, business as usual, see you at 1830 for GQ.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Is it actually taco Tuesday or is it ground beef in tortilla day?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There is cheese, beans and rice, shredded lettuce, chopped tomatoes and watery salsa too.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/8hdq0O6.jpeg

          Ice cream was delivered today.

          Not-very-good all-you-can-eat tacos, and cheapo bulk brand neapolitan ice cream? Yeah I'm thinking based.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Good odds on square pizza being available.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              the ol breadtangle of pizza

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I miss videogames.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Wait, all I had to do for square pizza was join the navy?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                yvan eht nioj~~

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I love the fact, that it's Neapolitan ice cream everywhere else in the world even though it originated from a agricultural architect named Fürst Pückler.

            You can see it if you look at the different languages on the Wikipedia page. It says Fürst Pückler ice cream on the German page.
            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neapolitan_ice_cream

            One of his fears was, that no one would remember him for his creations, but only for his famous ice cream, which everybody copied. (It was very popular with the ruling french families and got its english name because of the famous tricolour like those of the French revolution, which were Napoleos colors)

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What kinda tortijas or its corn taco shell?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >ground beef
        It's like taco bell ground "beef" but worst

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I've never been allowed on a USN ship, how many tacos are you allowed? Because I can eat a lot of fricking tacos and it would get messy

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        All you can eat tacos, but they're not very good.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah that would cut it down, still. Not very good tacos + not being sunk is generally a good enough way to be

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Because I can eat a lot of fricking tacos and it would get messy
        If this is a fat guy in an all-you-can-eat buffet situation then you will be asked to leave the ship

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Not fat, just a big ugly meathead ex-soldier that did exchange-student in Mexico for a year with a family there
          So my spirit animal is Speedy Gonzales and I don't run on regular

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What if the captain does it?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >you will be asked to leave the ship
          D-do they make you walk the plank?

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ice cream was delivered today.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I wonder how much the turdies aboard russian ships seethe when they find out americans are eating ice cream and tacos, while they're stuck on board pic related eating moldy grechka

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        tacos and ice cream are just miniscule amenities compared to the warm embrace of mazut you gay transvestite ass fricked HATO prostitute

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That whole pic related makes me fricking seethe

      >Tweeting while on OP's
      >Homg fellow redditors! #IceCreamSocial !

      We went from hard charging madmen like Nimitz, Leahy and Moffet to this homosexual shit. You had a carrier Cptn. almost mutiny during COVID and now this shit. Wtf.
      >I'm not b***hing about the icream, I'm talking about how the Captain is conducting himself.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        you couldn't captain a two man canoe

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Not an argument.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Neither is yours.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              It may upset you but it's a valid criticism.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                lol no it's not
                your personal opinion is less valid than jack shit

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                As I said, you liking something, even if it's just an opinion, does not invalidate it. A superior argument may invalidate it, you catching feelings is not an argument.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                As I said, you disliking something, is just an opinion, and does not validate it. A superior argument might validate it, but your feelings is not an argument.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Sorry sweaty, the future of the US military is adaptation to the times.
        If you wanna live in a regressive state that chugs its own cum thinking about past burly men, Russia is right there.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's difficult af and a long career process to even be considered to be a carrier captain, so I think he knows how to act better than a gay like you.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >We went from hard charging madmen like Nimitz, Leahy and Moffet to this homosexual shit.
        The guys you are talking about built an entire ship with a singular purpose to make and transport ice cream to the South Pacific for the sailors and troops, wtf are you talking about you absolute single digit IQ moron?
        /pol/tards really are the stupidest people to ever live. Frick off and die, moron.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Try giving my post a read
          >Not talking about the ice cream

          https://i.imgur.com/23rBc3v.jpeg

          The best tacos are those cash only places that you just know are a front for money laundering

          [...]
          Stop projecting your own insecurities. The rest of us aren't actually afraid to sit back and have some ice cream once in a while.
          Like, why do you constantly need to be surrounded by big burly muscular strongmen all the time? Is it because it makes you feel safe and so you can forget your own weakness?
          Grow up and get a spine.

          Or, maybe, I don't like seeing senior leadership behaving like a corporate PR team on Twitter of all places.

          >why do you constantly need to be surrounded by big burly muscular strongmen all the time?
          Not sure where you're getting this from. Very reddit tho.

          You need a father.

          Got one. Love him.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Or, maybe, I don't like seeing senior leadership behaving like a corporate PR team on Twitter of all places.
            Why? Is it because it hurts your feelings?
            They still do their job, the ship is still afloat, and you're not enlisted so who cares what you think.
            What does how you feel about social changes have anything to do with anything.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Because it's off-putting and makes makes people like me (prime recruiting pool) less interested in enlisting?

              Do you think it's a coincidence that only the Marines, who's public facing image is all piss and vinegar, are the only branch who have zero issues meeting their recruiting quotas?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you seem to have a high opinion of yourself
                if you want to join so much, then just join
                if something like a couple of twitter posts is enough to get in the way of that, then how much of that was you actually wanting to join and serve vs you just wanting to be validated by hello how do you do fellow tough men
                and again, unless you're actually part of the army or marines or whatever and are involved in the recruitment process, what matter is it to you that they meet their recruitment goals or not
                if they fail, do you personally suffer? why do you care so much even?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >It's just like one tweet
                Patterns of behavior affect how people view the brand.

                >Why do you care
                Why do you?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I didn't say that it was just one tweet. I just said that if you really wanted to serve, then you would do so regardless of the public image the military has. Unless of course your motivation for joining wasn't to actually serve but to feel validated and accepted, in which case you might want to reexamine why you hate the military so much for not showing off the tough guy image anymore that you like so much.
                As for why I care? I don't. I'm not the one complaining about the military.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I just said that if you really wanted to serve, then you would do so regardless of the public image the military has
                Recruit intake numbers say otherwise.

                >joining wasn't to actually serve but to feel validated and accepted
                I'm starting to think you're not American. If you don't understand basic cultural nuances.

                >in which case you might want to reexamine why you hate the military so much for not showing off the tough guy image
                Those are your assumptions of what I think.

                >As for why I care? I don't
                Yet you continue to reply.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Recruit intake numbers say otherwise.
                we're not talking about other people. we're talking about you

                >I'm starting to think you're not American. If you don't understand basic cultural nuances.
                my cultural nuance is that I don't have a psychological need for the miltary to fill my twitter feed with strong imagery

                >Those are your assumptions of what I think.
                alright, how do you really think then?

                >Yet you continue to reply.
                so do you

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >my cultural nuance is that I don't have a psychological need for the miltary to fill my twitter feed with strong imagery
                Is that what I said?

                >alright, how do you really think then
                I've been pretty clear.

                I guess what's happened is my posts triggered you, a tourist, and you're now attacking what you think I am/said instead of what I actually am and said.

                >so do you
                Yes, I care.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                alright. I'm wrong, and everything I said so far was merely my assumptions.
                Can you please tell us what you actually want now and why you want it?
                The only thing you've done so far is complain about generals making twitter posts and how that puts you off wanting to join the military.

                >Just go become a flag officer bro
                >If you're not prepared to do that your not allowed to be critical of anything

                to be fair, the only real requirements for becoming an officer is that you must be alive and know how to breathe

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Can you please tell us what you actually want now and why you want it?
                Re-read my posts. I'm not repeating myself.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're not going to enlist. Nobody in the military cares about your opinion. Go whine to the other neverserveds about how you would have signed up for rum, sodomy and the lash but a rainbow sticker tweet put you off.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Look at this REMF trying to puff itself up as something. How much VA disability did you get for falling in the PX?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You seem deeply concerned about a brand. Why?

                >Bro trust me man fricking halving your population in 60 years will totally work out. 700,000,000 less people buying things and producing will definitely not decimate your industry and GDP. Not a chance.

                Fifteen years from now butler robots will be as common as cars. We don't need more browns in America and China doesn't need more people of any kind in China. They're full.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >You seem deeply concerned about a brand. Why
                You're asking why someone cares about one the biggest US institutions?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                yes. state your answers in 100 words or less.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >glowie report N21-459321
                >Anon responded : suck my dick b***h
                >Anon's IP address is : 1.2.34.56789
                >Time Posted: 1705 Eastern

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Go whine to the other neverserveds about how you would have signed up for rum, sodomy and the lash but a rainbow sticker tweet put you off.
                Uh, yes? Navy, Army and USAF all missed their goals this year. Why? White middle-class dudes are not enlisting at anything close to the rate they did.

                So, you know, do some brand management.

                Look he thinks marines eat crayons isnt a marketing scheme to paint them as wacky buff dudes going on fun adventures and being stupid in general

                Btw marines do eat crayons

                My entire argument is that is a marketing scheme and that as such it's very effective.

                Do you think we will see a tweet from a Marine two-star about the MEU having an ice cream party? No? Yeah.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Why?
                MHS Genesis. You wouldn't have to ask fake rhetorical questions if you'd looked at the data culture warriors have never been about the facts.
                I doubt the rainbow shtick is attractive to military types but it's demonstrably not the scapegoat you're looking for.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >but it's demonstrably not the scapegoat you're looking for
                He says, having demonstrated nothing.

                You can't argue "it's the intake filters" when the numbers applying for intake are down, massively, in an identified demographic.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The facts don't care sweetie. Here's another datapoint for the audience: it's not right-wingers who account for recent non-medical dropoffs in white male recruiting. Leftists dropped the most.

                IOW, the end of the forever wars is the real cultural reason. A lot of men who wouldn't join a peacetime military do like the chance to go fighting, so now the fighting is over they go into business instead.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >it's not right-wingers who account for recent non-medical dropoffs in white male recruiting.
                Re-read what I said, dipshit. We're talking about pre-intake. Where the numbers are: DOWN. And who are they down with? White males from military families is: mil's core recruitment pool.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Where the numbers are: DOWN. And who are they down with? White males from military families is: mil's core recruitment pool.
                who cares?
                military still does it's job

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >who cares?
                >During fiscal year 2023, the military services collectively missed recruiting goals by about 41,000 recruits

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                right
                so I'll ask again
                who cares?
                and why does this even matter?
                all you've done is state a data point. Unless you give us an interpretation for that data point and it's effects, it's still just numbers on a page.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Why do you care
                Asked and answered.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I did not ask "why do you care?"
                obviously you care and are quite vocal about it
                I asked "who cares, and why does it matter?"
                All you've done is state that the us mil is posting stuff about ice cream or whatnot on twitter, and that recruitment dropped by 41k.
                But why does it even matter that recruitment drops anyways by 41k in the first place?
                If I said that the number of shark attacks dropped by 28 in the year 2023, what does that even mean?
                It's a number sure, but is that a lot? Is that a little? Will this mean that we will soon be able to overthrow our shark overlords as surely this is a sign of them getting weak?
                Writing an argumentative essay 101 anon. You must have learned how to do this in high school.
                Throwing a single number out there and seething about it is not how to state a proper argument or proposal.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >who cares, and why does it matter?"
                See

                >who cares?
                >During fiscal year 2023, the military services collectively missed recruiting goals by about 41,000 recruits

                >why does it even matter that recruitment drops anyways by 41k in the first place?
                Your asking why it matters that 40k open jobs didn't get filled?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                "During fiscal year 2023, the military services collectively missed recruiting goals by about 41,000 recruits"
                Again, this does not answer my question of "who cares" or "why does this matter"
                This is simply a statement about a number.

                >Your asking why it matters that 40k open jobs didn't get filled?
                Yes, I am asking you for the fifth or six time why it matters. Please tell us.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >moron cannot comprehend why the military being short 40 000 people is a problem

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >40 000
                Ah so you're not even American. Get the frick out of here.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Post guns.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Sure. You gonna post yours now?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                that's clearly a picture from 2020-06-19
                unless you just like naming your files weird things just because

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >asks for photo of my gun
                >gets photo of my gun
                >well I don't like it.
                Not my problem. Post your gun now.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >No timestamp
                First day on /k/?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >No timestamp

                that's clearly a picture from 2020-06-19
                unless you just like naming your files weird things just because

                Pandemic gun lmao

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                nobody acting upset in this thread is american, duh

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yes. Unfortunately, it is as you say, and I am moronic.
                I also ate 47 less tacos this year than I did last year.
                What does that mean? Who knows, anon. Who knows.
                Just like how we may never find out the answer to the question of why any of this matters.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Do you have AU or something?

                When someone leaves the military you have to replace them. If you don't replace 40 000 people it means that all across your organization you're undermanned. This is not good for productivity, working conditions or combat effectiveness.

                Put differently, if you need 80 tacos to survive and you only get 50... You're going to struggle.

                It's self-evident.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >When someone leaves the military you have to replace them. If you don't replace 40 000 people it means that all across your organization you're undermanned. This is not good for productivity, working conditions or combat effectiveness.
                >Put differently, if you need 80 tacos to survive and you only get 50... You're going to struggle.
                yes, this is the definition of not being able to fill positions

                >It's self-evident.
                No, it's not. what's most definitely not self evident is, as I keep saying, why this matters and by how much.
                yes, you now have an empty position. but if you have an organization of 3 million people, 40k missing might not have that great of an effect.
                The answer I am looking for is that 40,000 missing troops is about 2 divisions, or 5-6 brigades, which may or may not affect things in the event of a war.
                However, this depends entirely on where those positions were and which ones are filled or not filled.
                If it was rear line positions, then who cares. Front line infantry roles? then maybe there's a bit more cause for concern. But we don't actually know. Not unless you have any more data than just 41k open positions.

                The reason why I'm ragging on you so much is you haven't done your homework at all.
                All you've done is go hurr durr there's 41k open positions, and also they're posting about ice cream on twitter so military bad
                idiot. waste of oxygen.
                stop concern posting, and go do some proper research about what the actual problem is.
                but I don't know if I should have expected any better anyways seeing as it took you this long to answer even a basic question.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Why are you responding to the /misc/tard at this point. He ready outed himself as some flavor of brown with his number formatting.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Still waiting for you to post guns.

                >When someone leaves the military you have to replace them. If you don't replace 40 000 people it means that all across your organization you're undermanned. This is not good for productivity, working conditions or combat effectiveness.
                >Put differently, if you need 80 tacos to survive and you only get 50... You're going to struggle.
                yes, this is the definition of not being able to fill positions

                >It's self-evident.
                No, it's not. what's most definitely not self evident is, as I keep saying, why this matters and by how much.
                yes, you now have an empty position. but if you have an organization of 3 million people, 40k missing might not have that great of an effect.
                The answer I am looking for is that 40,000 missing troops is about 2 divisions, or 5-6 brigades, which may or may not affect things in the event of a war.
                However, this depends entirely on where those positions were and which ones are filled or not filled.
                If it was rear line positions, then who cares. Front line infantry roles? then maybe there's a bit more cause for concern. But we don't actually know. Not unless you have any more data than just 41k open positions.

                The reason why I'm ragging on you so much is you haven't done your homework at all.
                All you've done is go hurr durr there's 41k open positions, and also they're posting about ice cream on twitter so military bad
                idiot. waste of oxygen.
                stop concern posting, and go do some proper research about what the actual problem is.
                but I don't know if I should have expected any better anyways seeing as it took you this long to answer even a basic question.

                I'm not reading all that.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >concern posts
                >deflects when presented with an actual argument
                I am now demoralized and convinced that the US is about to collapse in 2 weeks

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >US is about to collapse in 2 weeks
                Who said this?

                I'm not interested in your cope essays about how you're not a complete moron for not understanding why a recruit shortage is bad for the military.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you love believing your own lies, just convince yourself we're very weak and afraid so you can move on already

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Unrelated seething response
                As expected.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i see you've given up on the narrative in op and are already settling for lesser propaganda points

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                it is, as the kids say nowadays, a dank may-may
                but I don't think you've done much for yourself either
                what's your point? Okay, US has 41k less positions now. This is objectively bad I guess.
                But what does it all meeaannnn bro?
                What do you want us to dddooooo about it?
                either shit or get off the toilet.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Took you 20 posts to figure out why something that's self-evidently bad is bad. I'm not wasting more time skipping stones on your smooth brain

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                In 2023, the US military failed to fill 41k positions.
                This may potentially have an impact on our combat ability in a future war.
                I believe this is because of the failed attempts at recruitment, and the change in culture to a less tough and militaristic PR campaign.
                To fix this, I propose that we introduce better programs such as advertising more to white middle class families, as they offer a much more stable environment and can produce better talent.
                Please let me know what you think of my idea.

                There. Only took 20 posts of asking, and I had to do most of the work for you, you absolute buffoon.
                But something tells me that you're only here to complain instead of have an actual discussion.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >instead of have an actual discussion
                You just conceded that you had inferred the jist of the argument long ago. Thus, your constant "but why?" was in bad faith. No?

                Yeah.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If you had posted such in the first place, I would have even agreed with you.
                Every single one of my "but why" posts was to get you to say exactly that.
                But you can't even formulate a proper argument aside from wow, look at the US military fail. Aren't they bad? Doesn't this make you feel bad? You should feel angry about the military and congress! Feel the emotion well up inside of you and demand that they do something!

                idiot. moron.
                use your brain and not your emotions.
                obviously the military not being able to fill their positions is a problem.
                it's not a catastrophic problem yet, but given time it has the potential to become an actual problem.
                getting mad about it and blaming it all on all the gay joos though is not the only solution. or even the best one.
                in reality, problems are often more faceted than just a single angle and often have multiple or even dozens of different factors compounding on each other.
                If you want to have a proper argument, at least identify more than just one and present then along with the percentage of the impact they have. preferably along with good data
                but since you have done none of these things and have not even made the slightest attempt to try despite my begging, I'm going to call you smelly and dumb and not even worth serious consideration
                do better next time please. for the sake of the US military before it's too late.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Unless you give us an interpretation for that data point and it's effects
                Two fewer military bases staffed.

                It's also a number that compounds. If you miss 40k per year it's not a shortage for 40k because contracts are not ~1 year long.

                The total size of the military is shrinking by about 30k people per year. The army is permanently closing 25k positions.

                It's a massive fricking problem if you care about America being too dog.

                Being less-gay wont solve it, but it will definitely be a step in the right direction. The cure for the culture war is to sanitize institutions of any evidence of cultural bias. If you don't play, you can't lose.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                it's peacetime, people don't flock to the military unless there's a reason. when the korean war happened america only had 600,000 or so troops at the start, that changed very quickly to nearly 7 million

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Because we were drafting people.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                welp. Guess which bill is coming back the moment the war with china kicks off.
                but hey, at least /misc/ anon will finally be able to join the military that he loves so much even with all the trannies hiding under his barracks bed

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Everyone who disagrees with me is /misc/
                You still haven't posted guns btw.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                and people were genuinely afraid of and mad at communists. americans don't like being slighted

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you could always just do conscription again. every 18 year old has to serve 10 months. this way you get them in and then you offer money for staying a few months longer. this is how countries with conscription do it. a lot of conscripts actually start to like the service once they are used to it and enlist when they would have never considered enlisting before their conscription service.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No. Conscription is stupid, see: Vietnam. We're not some tiny euro state who only has to worry about defensive wars.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                or you go the russian way, recruit from prisons. offer paroles for service. you americans have a a large prison population. i see potential there.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Jesus Christ, where do you get all these amazing cat pics?! They're ridiculously cute.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Unless you give us an interpretation for that data point and it's effects
                Two fewer military bases staffed.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Two military bases
                It's about four divisions worth of people or roughly the entire British contingent during OIF.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >we're talking about what I say we're talking about!1
                Data doesn't care about your culture war. You're free to seethe, but don't expect anyone to listen when your opinions are based on false ideas.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Are you moronic? So you're saying that the .mil exceeded it's targeted intake and the shortfall of 40k was purely down to pre-intake filtering?
                >Culture war!
                You're the one who's defending the culture war. I don't want one at all.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Uh, yes? Navy, Army and USAF all missed their goals this year. Why? White middle-class dudes are not enlisting at anything close to the rate they did.
                >So, you know, do some brand management.
                cool
                good idea
                maybe you should enlist and become a recruiter so you can change things around
                though on second thought, seeing as complaining about it instead on an indonesian stick collecting image board is much easier and comfortable, maybe you should keep doing that instead

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >No you're not allowed to talk about it!
                Why?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                nobody said that
                but if you're so insistent it's a problem, maybe you should get off your ass and do something about it

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Just go become a flag officer bro
                >If you're not prepared to do that your not allowed to be critical of anything

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                People are not enlisting, because it's a bad career choice and not paid well. You can earn a frick ton of more money in the free market for nearly shit jobs like being a McDonald's cashier.

                Not everyone is this super hardcore right wing turd, that believes in the superiority of Prussian drills and ridiculous amounts of symbolic gesture like marching in formation.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, they’re not enlisting because they’re FAT. Lower-class young Southern white men were the traditional demographic for enlistment; they were not obese in the past, and now they are. Recruiters have stretched and bent requirements and even send applicants to fricking weight loss camp to get them into minimum shape — but in the end of the day the US armed forces do not take fat people.

                In 2018 of the 18-25 y/o recruitment bracket 33% were obese, and it’s WORSE now. It was 6% in 1978! Obesity is hard disqualification from recruitment (although you can get away with becoming obese while serving, but not in a combat role). Yet you people will make up this bullshit narratives about not wanting to serve Zog or whatever cringe shit.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >No, they’re not enlisting because they’re FAT. Lower-class young Southern white men were the traditional demographic for enlistment; they were not obese in the past, and now they are. Recruiters have stretched and bent requirements and even send applicants to fricking weight loss camp to get them into minimum shape — but in the end of the day the US armed forces do not take fat people.
                >In 2018 of the 18-25 y/o recruitment bracket 33% were obese, and it’s WORSE now. It was 6% in 1978! Obesity is hard disqualification from recruitment (although you can get away with becoming obese while serving, but not in a combat role). Yet you people will make up this bullshit narratives about not wanting to serve Zog or whatever cringe shit.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Look he thinks marines eat crayons isnt a marketing scheme to paint them as wacky buff dudes going on fun adventures and being stupid in general

                Btw marines do eat crayons

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Or, maybe, I don't like seeing senior leadership behaving like a corporate PR team on Twitter of all places.

            Yeah. These leaders would be really moronet by showing off the good conditions their military is able to provide. The Navy soldiers need to be tough man! They have to endure scurvy and rape in order to be good soldiers!

            An inspiring leader knows how to motivate his crew. You're very apparently none.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You need a father.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      if everything was fine they wouldnt be pushing the propaganda that "everything is fine" so hard

      ask yourself when was the last time the us navy spammed social media with how good things are on a ship in combat?

      oh and im sure the retreat to home is completely unrelated and probably just to go pick up more tacos because they cant wait for the taco delivery ship to come to them on deployment

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >the lack of proof is the proof

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >we cant post timestamped pictures of the ship for some reason despite spamming the internet with ice cream propaganda israelitebiden style

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            you already tried and failed to do this. can't you lie about hitting a different ship this time

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >video gets posted of Captain discussing recent Red Sox game with air boss
            >it's not good enough
            Real 68IQ moron ain't ya.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >it must be damaged because I say so
        If it was damaged I'm sure you'd have proof. Brownoids lie worse than. Russians

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          russians and brownoids are more trustworthy than our israelited government and i unironically read RT news because its the only source of legitimate mainstream media news thats not 99% israelite globohomosexual propaganda so suck a dick homosexual NAFO troony

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            bait or moronic? who knows these days

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >all those buzzwords

            [...]

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              bait or moronic? who knows these days

              >all this israelite propaganda and internet shilling

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                so you are moronic. thanks for letting us know

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >gets questioned
                >breaks down into DA JOOS
                clockwork. This is /k/ not your hugbox.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah its the glowie hugbox get it right putler

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >if everything was fine they wouldnt be pushing the propaganda that "everything is fine" so hard
        >ask yourself when was the last time the us navy spammed social media with how good things are on a ship in combat?
        Streisand effect

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They're not posting any harder than usual. Fricking christ, do you REALLY think that the US, famously known for disliking it when their ships get hit by stuff, would not go absolutely apeshit if some sand-humping morons even scratched their paint?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          its just turdies who live in places when one of their own domestic wunderwaffe eats shit, their leather daddy dictator president adds additional lies to the liarcake so they assume thats what we do.

          in reality, if a sand Black person sneezed on the flight deck I wouldn't be surprised if the EWS system nationwide was activated and Ernie over at the Marine Recruitment Center starts handing out tags to bag "Abdul," and "Chang."

          listen up mohammed/wang - your own guy laid this shit out a long time ago "all warfare is fought through deception; appear weak when you are strong, appear strong when you are weak."

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >if everything was fine they wouldnt be pushing the propaganda that "everything is fine" so hard
        Oh. Oh, really. So... how the frick do you falsify your bullshit theory, moron?
        U.S. posts "everything is fine"
        >aha! something *must* be wrong because they said "everything is fine"!
        So tell us all right now, genius: what response would have you saying "I guess there really is nothing to see here"?
        U.S. ironically posts "oh, no! were were hit by a Houthi missile that nobody took a picture of, lol!"
        >aha! they wouldn't deny it or joke about it unless they were trying to deflect!
        U.S. doesn't post anything, refuses to acknowledge obviously false and unsubstantiated claims
        >aha! something must be wrong because they refuse to acknowledge the allegations!
        Either explain in detail the EXACT response that would mute your brainlet 76 IQ responses, or provide proof that you've slammed your testicles in a car door as your single most important contribution to humanity's genetic legacy.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Did /misc/troons already memoryhole how they were spamming threads for like a week about how it was hit/sunk?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The turdies are too busy printing medals commemorating it being sunk to actually reply to this thread.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The photos of the rescued Filipino crew from the cargo ship that was recently hit landing on the flight deck didn't seem to show that

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They been deployed for a while now and heading to the Med now where Lebanon is supposed to kick off.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >supposed to
      Can the middle east stop trying to murder each other for 5 minutes. Should just have glassed the entire area in the 50s.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Sounds like someone needs a taco.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He needs something to fill the void of sadness, but I bet he'd feel a little better after a burrito

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Sounds like a taco fricked his girlfriend

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        his dad went out to get taco's and never came back

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >t. Gordon Ramsowski from Gourmet Oblast, angry we eat tacos over TRUE high cuisine.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I bet this guy has no idea that we can see he's ESL instantly

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Like half of the countries in macaco's macaco are pro-western.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Sit down anon, have a taco and a modelo

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Hispanic detected!!!
      A white man's taco is in a crispy shell with ground beef.
      It is not some lost dog's shredded meat in a a greasy tortilla

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Frick hard shells, I would just eat nachos at that point.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >hard shell
        Disgusting.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Don't be like that anon, we have opportunity enough in this land blessed by god for both types of tacos.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >hard shells
        You probably put sour cream on it too you fricking rube

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >hard shell
          Just make nachos you fricking ape

          Behead those who insult Taco Bell, subwAllah

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >all restaurants are Taco Bell after the franchise wars
            Insallah Tostada

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The fact that they made a giant cheez-it for the new crunch wrap and didn't sell it standalone infuriates me.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              You can order just the cheez it, it's $1 IIRC.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I want to buy it at the store in a pack.

                No, never Mexico. Please, too many here already.

                Baja is rightful American clay

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'll accept Baja, as long as the locals get evicted (except anyone with cartel tattoos; they get the Tepes treatment).

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >hard shell
        Just make nachos you fricking ape

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >taco shatters into several pieces upon the first bite
        way to out yourself as a moron. I don't understand why hard tacos exist.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Ignore these homosexuals anon. Hard shell tacos are the white, thinking man's choice.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Enjoy your unseasoned ground beef nachos

        [...]
        Behead those who insult Taco Bell, subwAllah

        >his taco establishment pays taxes
        NGMI

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The best tacos are those cash only places that you just know are a front for money laundering

          That whole pic related makes me fricking seethe

          >Tweeting while on OP's
          >Homg fellow redditors! #IceCreamSocial !

          We went from hard charging madmen like Nimitz, Leahy and Moffet to this homosexual shit. You had a carrier Cptn. almost mutiny during COVID and now this shit. Wtf.
          >I'm not b***hing about the icream, I'm talking about how the Captain is conducting himself.

          Stop projecting your own insecurities. The rest of us aren't actually afraid to sit back and have some ice cream once in a while.
          Like, why do you constantly need to be surrounded by big burly muscular strongmen all the time? Is it because it makes you feel safe and so you can forget your own weakness?
          Grow up and get a spine.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Enchiladas are better than tacos.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      thanks doc

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/vUlC6pR.png

      >Hispanic detected!!!
      A white man's taco is in a crispy shell with ground beef.
      It is not some lost dog's shredded meat in a a greasy tortilla

      Mexicans eat American tacos, too. They share the name tacos dorados with another dish.

      Enchiladas are better than tacos.

      They are pretty fricking good.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Ok Paco

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          All I'm saying is I'm not gonna take your crispy tacos from you, there's room for everyone to enjoy their preferred type.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The Taco should be enjoyed on a Friday.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Friday night or Saturday night. I love hitting my local taco joint with the boys after a couple of drinks

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >after a month of repairing and fixing

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >he believes it
      What's going to be the proofs this time cumrag? A badly photoshopped deck? Or maybe some arma footage?

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Alright, did this shit actually get damaged by the houthis or was it really damaged by a crash landing of a jet?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nor the Captain of the carrier nor the US Navy have stated that anything happened.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        But why would they admit it? Isn't it the military's policy to not confirm nor deny anything?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >hide a US carrier getting hit
          Why would they do that? It drums up support for THD and dumping money into the MIC

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That's not how western militaries work my totally white fellow citizen of HATO.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Like the other anon alluded to, a successful hit, never mind a hit that manages to sink, a US supercarrier, would jolt the US into a war fever like 9/11 and Pearl Harbor. We would finally drag that shithole of a region into the 21st century by killing every fighting age male for attacking us like that twice within one lifetime.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It didn't get damaged at all, the whole thing is literally just thirdie cope and schizo hallucinations

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        For like the third time in a month, no less. They should at least switch up their lies

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why is it returning 2 weeks early then? Its deployment was just extended by another month, and CENTCOM wanted it extended again after that. There's no other carrier available to replace it, so now shipping is going to get extra buttfricked by the houthis (they just sank the MV Tutor and the MV Verbena btw)
        https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2024/06/02/eisenhower-carrier-strike-group-deployment-extended/

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      imagine looking at a blown up .22 lr bullet hole photoshopped onto a flight deck and thinking "this is plausible".

      Is moronation truly bliss?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Is moronation truly bliss?
        I dunno, this thread has convinced me that tacos and ice cream are bliss.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >I dunno, this thread has convinced me that tacos and ice cream are bliss.
          They are. All you need after that is the Triforce. of Big Tiddy Goth Girlfriend.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      just brown hands and their brown dreams

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Someone was schizoposting that they were running some cute new drone that got slapped by a missile or drone bomb while being moved on the elevator. Elevator is jammed with a very expensive new toys ass hanging in tatters, so they got told to gtfo to somewhere they could crane it off and do repairs. Almost assuredly bullshit though since we'd never hear the end of it from shills and every rogue actor would be snapping pics of the new trashed Yankee mystery plane.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >this picture is as good as their proof gets
      nothing fricking happened. CIWS didn't even activate. the CSG wasn't even aware they were the subject of an attack. a swing and a fricking miss by miles. but because they launched an ASM in the direction of a ship, and it says it's anti-ship, that must mean they killed all the ships in that area. advanced weapons are just magic like that. nevermind that the CSG was operating from well outside the range of the missiles they're claiming to have performed the attack with.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        isn't that bottom-right pic the one from like the 60s, and john mccain's fault? you know, the guy who died of old age years ago?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Not the same fire, which wasn't McCain's fault. The rocket which misfired was from a Phantom and McCain flew skyhawks

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you also might notice that the damage doesn't seem to be in the same place in any of the photos. nor does that level of damage correspond to the payload of an ASM. they also have some shitty arma footage.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dirkas have claimed at least 3 times now they hit or sunk the Eisenhower. The commander of the Eisenhower didn't even know there was an attack attempt on the ship, let alone that it apparently sunk him, to his amusement. Of course, Houthis are Arabs, and Arabs lie like real people breathe, so they might not have ever even attacked it.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Dirkas have claimed at least 3 times now they hit or sunk the Eisenhower.
        Same as it ever was.

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ike is gonna be the next Enterprise, right?

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I love the fact that only few countries can barely sustain a nuclear carrier program.

    The US has taco Tuesdays on theirs.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the eisenhower has almost reached the end of its mission time and soon has to return to its home port and no other carrier is available to replace it. houthis can then easily strike ships and claim victory.

      this red sea escort mission is an unwinnable battle unless yemen gets entirely sea blockaded which would only be possible if the us redirected ships from the pacific but that would leave taiwan vulnerable. shit is fricked.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >no other carrier is available to replace it
        Lincoln is worked up already
        Truman is available in October

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >and no other carrier is available to replace it
        The Navy literally just announced today that the Roosevelt CSG is replacing it.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          the roosevelt is part of the 7th fleet which is meant for the pacific, but the red sea is 5th fleet responsibility. so basically the houthis have exhausted and thus basically defeated the 5th fleet and the us navy now has to bring up ships from the other side of the planet to prevent a complete defeat.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >we rotated out
            >this means the houthis defeated a US fleet
            You have to try and be this moronic. The US has 11 carriers so it can rotate out when needed. A carrier goes where it's needed it doesn't get locked to one area.

            China is literally the world's biggest economy, they'd survive. As for the rest of the world, they're all joining BRICS. People are tired of being bullied by the EU and US.

            >china
            See picrel
            >BRICS
            Pipedreams have more substance than that.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What type of horrible person do you have to be, if you try to ruin taco Tuesday.

        Don't you have soul man?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          i like tacos too but i dont see the goal to victory in the red sea. the houthis keep spamming cheap drones and the us has to pay billions to intercept them 24/7/365 with no end in sight.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >hurrrr durr the US has to pay billions
            Economists have been a disaster to the US Military strategic race.

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Off topic, but aircraft carriers never fail to blow my mind. With their crew complements they are basically a self-contained floating small town. I've heard a lot of ex-navy guys say they prefer the sense of community on smaller ships though.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I've heard a lot of ex-navy guys say they prefer the sense of community on smaller ships though.

      yeah i don't doubt it. i also hear people die fairly often on navy vessels, at least more than you'd expect.

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the horizon line of the photo almost lining up with the line of the page layout is nice

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >assured me got hit with a chinese missile?
    I hope you’re okay, getting hit by Chinese missiles is no fun

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Tacos are always sign of decadent empire about to fall. My comissar assures me of this.

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I have never had a taco. They don't exist in my country I think.
    Are they good?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It’s kind of like asking if a sandwich is good. There will be kinds you like and kinds you don’t like, but generally the Tex-Mex style with flour tortillas, grilled steak or ground beef, and cheese are among the most popular. Among the Mexican types, lamb barbacoa (slow braised meat from the head and neck) is probably my favorite followed by beef barbacoa or lengua and cachete (beef tongue in cheek meat). Al pastor is a Mexican variety of spicy pork cooked on a gyro spit with pineapple, also very good.

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How did a thread go from being about US sailors eating tacos to a zeihantard/chink shill shitflinging match?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because the ice cream tweet hurt anon's feelings and reminded him of reddit, so it's the fault of the entire US military for hiring black people and women and not appealing to huwhite strong men like him.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >hiring black people and women and not appealing to huwhite strong men like him.
        What's funny is I never said that, you projected that shit onto me. Your politics are showing.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Some of us are still talking about tacos

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I’m happy they’re enjoying Taco Tuesday. But couldn’t they protect the MV Tutor? What are they there for if not to at least protect shipping? Someone explain it to me. Shit happens I guess but then shouldn’t commanders get fired when they screw up? I seem to recall that happening a lot in ww2 for example.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They were carrying a load of cargo bound for Russia. Honest mistake. 🙂

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >abroad ship

    dyslexic ESL propagandists cant even write aboard

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    don't mind me, just sitting here wondering how long this charming back and forth will take before someone points out that correlation is not causation

    and precious little correlation at that

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not a one of you fricking trash have even an EXCUSE for how MV Tutor was sunk?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Sit, this is taco bell.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        sitting during a taco bell emergency is a luxury

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So, where's a recent photo of the ship? Why the passive agressive woman-like social media posts? Something hit it. It didn't sink but probably scared the shit out of the Admirals that they're doing all these red herring media rigmarole.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      your sense of masculinity is overblown in order to compensate for your various shortcomings. men can like ice cream and cute animals without losing face

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >can you prove the ship was NOT hit!?
      Black person we aren't going to prove a negative for your moronic claims.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        As has already been mentioned the captain posted a video recently talking about a red sox game they lost. That apparently wasn't good enough.

  30. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Are fish tacos /k/-approved?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/fWw3YnY.jpeg

      https://i.imgur.com/pwyyUDK.jpeg

      >no pico, no molé, not even an appreciable salsa
      What is that putrescent thousand-island looking nonsense you spread on them?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Ease up, ese. Take a closer look, that ain't no midwestern Thousand Island/Tartar sauce bullshit.
        For your basic fish taco, what you want is crema, seasoned with some salt and pepper (and maybe a splash of lime juice and chili powder). The pictures honestly look legit without knowing more about what's really being served here.
        Now, depending on the fish, I might supplement your basic crema with a smoky ancho-heavy salsa... but molé? With a batter-fried whitefish? I'm curious to know what seafood you've found to pair perfectly with molé. Clue me in, homes.
        >Verification not required.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >crema with salsa ancho
          Carry on then

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            To answer the molé question, I make a molé verde that actually goes pretty good with shrimp or catfish, but I bow to the selection of crema with salsa de chile ancho, it would be the gentleman's preferred choice.

            I'm not sure if either of you gents is the Anon to whom I was replying, but my experience has been that a crema is the cornerstone of a well-garnished fish taco. The paradox is that something like cod or haddock can be jazzed up in different ways precisely because the flavor is so delicate and neutral. Swordfish or halibut are more opinionated, but consider salmon: there's not a lot you can do unless you want to drown out the salmon flavor completely.
            >molé verde
            >with shrimp or catfish
            Damn it all, it's getting late but now I'm hungry. Cheers, Anon.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah, I'm the same anon, by the time I finished hitting post on the "thousand-island" post my mind was already saying "crema and ancho?" but it was too late.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Hey, buddy, no worries. Stay safe, and happy shooting. 😀

                >t. former kid from shitkicker yeehaw Utah, who's had to smile politely through a meal where a friend's grandmother tried to make "fish tacos"

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          To answer the molé question, I make a molé verde that actually goes pretty good with shrimp or catfish, but I bow to the selection of crema with salsa de chile ancho, it would be the gentleman's preferred choice.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I don't really like this particular restaurant's salsa (too chunky, too spicy) so I usually just order without it

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Crema and shredded cabbage is traditional on baja-style fish tacos, moron. Complaining about crema on a fish taco is like complaining about someone putting secret sauce on a burger.

        That said they're still an irredeemable 0/10 because they're on fricking flour tortillas.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >didn't read the thread

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/fWw3YnY.jpeg

      https://i.imgur.com/pwyyUDK.jpeg

      God, I hope this really is Hill

      Imagine a sitting captain of a US carrier catching shit for posting on /k/

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        We actually have had a verified ATF processor here at one time, a CVN Captain being a /k/ommando wouldn't be the weirdest thing in the world.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          There are more gov employees on /k/ than you think
          There's probably a decent percentage of active mil that's /k/ even

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I am ok with the fish taco, there may be many who aren't though

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      All tacos, as weapons of waistline and bowel destruction are /k/ approved. Prefer gator myself, cut the tail into strips and beer batter them with a mix of old bay seasoning, flour and a cerveza. Deep fry until the nuggets get golden brown and float. Coat a soft shell taco with bit of chipotle and sour cream mix sauce and top with cabbage and pico de gallo. You can soak the gator in milk for a bit to get rid of the "swamp" flavor if you want.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >waistline destruction

        That would imply tacos help you get thinner lol

  31. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  32. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  33. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    And ANOTHER thing, stop boosting Taco Bell! That shit is EASILY the worst American fast food chain. I’m not saying I didn’t have a Taco Bell craving for one thing or another ever in my life but it’s the LAST place I think about when hungry. Like, if I didn’t pay attention to the time and the only place open is a McDonalds and I don’t feel like getting stale / bad late night shit from them, THEN I may consider Taco Bell.

  34. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm glad this thread can die having ultimately discussed tacos

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  35. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >morons still pushing unfalsifiable bullshit about how it got hit because its being rotated out to be replaced with another carrier
    These people are more moronic than academics.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *