What is the strategic advantage of changing your supreme commander every sixty fucking days?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    oh no no no where did it go wrong zizsters?

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    keep thep fresh and alert.
    piggies use same potato for a year, it’s wilted, not enougth sleep, drained out. Stupid ukronazis don’t understand rotating and rest kek

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      i know that you are meming, but napoleon was running circles around europe for almost 20 years non stop. the only thing that defeated him was stomach cancer

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >the only thing that defeated him was stomach cancer
        And a few British, Prussians, Dutch, and Hanoverian guys.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          His cancer was a major factor in his defeat at waterloo

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            So were the British, Prussians, Dutch, and Hanoverian guys.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Nah, those clowns contributed nothing of value towards it. They were just lucky Napoleon got sick, otherwise he would turn them into roasted meat.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I personally like the theory that it was haemorrhoids that caused him to lose Waterloo, because he could no longer ride his horse properly so he had to leave everything to his subordinates and hope they didn't frick up.

            https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3282839/#:~:text=Napoleon%20was%20not%20feeling%20well,by%20very%20painful%20thrombosed%20hemorrhoids.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              i heard that he couldn't ride his horse because of the stomach cancer

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >for the enemies of Russia there will be no coffee in morning
    >loses Kherson
    >gets replaced

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Russian generals have more rotations than frontline units, that's just how it was planned.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    He was just the fall guy for Kherson. Now that the Mobiks are coming on line they want someone from the inner circle to take credit for the spring offensives. It’s all politics.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Prihozhin was big supporter of Surovikin
    >Prihozhin hated Gerasimov
    >Prihozhin had a mission to capture Bakhmut until X date
    >Surovikin gives him all artillery he needs and keeps throwing remains of Russian rockets into electrical grid
    >5 months later Prihozhin still can't capture Bakhmut
    >two weeks ago Prihozhin started whining that capturing Bakhmut is impossible
    >get new order to capture Soledar
    >Prihozhin gathers all his spare troops, Surovikin gives him several thousands vdv to capture Soledar
    >Prihozhin throws everything into it, despite it still can't capture the village
    >11.01 comes
    >starts making photo-ops in eastmost salt mines pretending he captured the village
    >starts saying that village is taken and they have 200, no 500 prisoners, hoorah, Prihozhin is saved
    >Russian MoD says that city is still not taken
    >Surovikin is instantly removed and replaced with Gerasimov
    So what happens to Prihozhin now? It seems that he failed Monke one last time

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >11.01 comes
      god fricking dammit vatnik command and these fricking dates

      >So what happens to Prihozhin now? It seems that he failed Monke one last time
      gets on a short leash and disappears from view. he's still running the racket, has ties to the organized crime and runs the shill farms.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      He better not get too close to any windows.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Surovikin gives him all artillery he needs
      Didn’t Wagner complain that Gerasimov wasn’t sending them artillery ammo not too long ago?
      Was all of this an inside job?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      sounds a bit too fantastical for me, but I am wondering why they pivoted towards Soledad so fast? They don't seem to have been interested in it before and it doesn't seem to have been completely painless for them to take. Maybe they got a good opportunity?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >doesn't seem to have been completely painless for them to take.
        They lost countless people and still haven't taken it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >it doesn't seem to have been completely painless for them to take
        It didn't, according to the russian Telegram channels the situation is looking dire..

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          why did you cover attack aircraft with assault troops

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Shturmovik means both but it machine translated to the aircraft one while its obviously talking about stormtroopers.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >pivoted
        Bahmut is one of the many strongpoints in a much wider front. The Russians have been fighting near Soledar for 6 months

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      He's in charge of catering in the Kremlin, Vova can't get rid of him since he's the only guy guaranteed not to poison the president

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        He who controls the banana, controls the monke.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Possibly related, Putin changed all his staff around the time the Belarusian Foreign Minister was assassinated.

        He might not trust Piro anymore

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >guaranteed not to poison
        ???

        He's guaranteed to poison him the second he thinks he can install himself instead.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I doubt your version of events is right, but... if true, it might be fun to watch.
      Both Surovikin and Prigozhin have commited so many major crimes that Putin can have them killed on a whim if he is in control of the circus.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The frick do you mean you doubt it? Pretty much everything he said is factual.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Gerasimov gets a new lease to sell off as much equipment, fuel and munitions as possible to line his own pockets
      HE CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It’s rare I see someone else post my oc. Thanks anon 🙂

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Zisters, I don't understand, we made so many edits of him in sunglasses!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's all part of the plan, stay strong, fellow Rusissy.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It means the enemy can never anticipate your tactics.
    The Butcher of Syria‘s massed artillery got pretty old quickly so General Armageddon was called in to spice things up with terror bombings and strategic regroupings. Now Gerasimov will probably bring back his fabled rush for B tactics from February. Ukes can never be prepared.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      why doesn't Gerasimov get a ridiculous capeshit supervillain name?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        He never got his chance to do war crimes on Syrian civilians.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Because he's arguably the only one who's a somewhat competent commander.
        The other two were just evil henchmen brought up to cackle maniacally for the cameras, so they needed some kewl name to make them sound more important than they actually are..

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Because he's arguably the only one who's a somewhat competent commander.
          He has 0 military experience. I hope they send him to Ukraine to join his nephew.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Zalujni says he respects Herasimov greatly

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Source: krokodil binge with mom

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's true. Zaluzhnyi said in an interview for The Time that all military science is in Russia and he learned everything about doctrines from Gerasimov. You can check it yourself and bypass their paid subscription screen or translate his direct quote

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              *respectED and HAD high expectations. Before it came to actual action and all Gerasimov theorycrafting proved to be worthless.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >"He has 0 military experience"
            In this case that may be an advantage.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >He has 0 military experience.
            Gerasimov's served in the Soviet/Russian army for the last 51 years.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              So Afghanistan and both Chechen wars?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You're thinking of Shoigu. Gerasimov is the most competent military mind in Russia.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It's honestly funny, since honestly Gerasimov's thunder run would have worked at least semi fine with a well supplied army or hell, the 1968 Soviet Army.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I've been calling him Old Shrapnelsides since May.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >strategic regroupings
      Regrouping directly into the enemy trench lines lmfao

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/nEAHSvI.jpg

      >Prihozhin was big supporter of Surovikin
      >Prihozhin hated Gerasimov
      >Prihozhin had a mission to capture Bakhmut until X date
      >Surovikin gives him all artillery he needs and keeps throwing remains of Russian rockets into electrical grid
      >5 months later Prihozhin still can't capture Bakhmut
      >two weeks ago Prihozhin started whining that capturing Bakhmut is impossible
      >get new order to capture Soledar
      >Prihozhin gathers all his spare troops, Surovikin gives him several thousands vdv to capture Soledar
      >Prihozhin throws everything into it, despite it still can't capture the village
      >11.01 comes
      >starts making photo-ops in eastmost salt mines pretending he captured the village
      >starts saying that village is taken and they have 200, no 500 prisoners, hoorah, Prihozhin is saved
      >Russian MoD says that city is still not taken
      >Surovikin is instantly removed and replaced with Gerasimov
      So what happens to Prihozhin now? It seems that he failed Monke one last time

      lol

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Stalin did the same, and he succeded.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      after getting lend lease by the US yeah

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >lend lease by the US
        And the UK.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        What is lend-lease
        What is Germany fighting on 3 fronts vs stalin's 1?

        anyone else notice people saying lend lease won the war in the east more and more? did some youtuber make a video or something? or is it to discredit the ussr because of current events?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Wait until youtube realises have the people the Russians claimed died fighting the Germans on the eastern front and count as societ casualties were actually killed or deliberately starved to death by the NKVD

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >because of current events?
          Russians can't even conquer a country with half the GDP of Bangladesh. All thew while Western aid costing only a fraction of NATO budget stopped the invasion dead in its tracks.
          At this point only shills believe that Lend Lease wasn't the thing propping up the USSR.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            germany lost before lend lease arrived

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Lend Lease arrived before Lend Lease was even signed by congress. Check how much aid was sent even before 1942. Most of it was food sent to keep commies from starving even further. Trucks unfricked the logistics and don't even tell me supplying more than half their fuel (even though they have oil lmao) wasn't helpful.

              https://i.imgur.com/EWaN66I.jpg

              T food?

              Canned food I think

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Not just that, the amount of food the Soviets received was pretty much like a third or a fourth of their entire wartime consumption, and this was after they lost their breadbasket in the Ukraine.

                Between that and the fuel, the US essentially kept the USSR from starving to death enmasse, and/or running out of fuel and getting fricked. On top of that, they supplied over a third of the USSR's locomotives and railroad equipment. Between that and trucks, they basically enabled Bagration, Uranus, and every other Soviet counterattack.

                Amusingly, them micromanaging the Soviets' logistics for them, might have actually set up the failure we see today, as the Soviets never learned to manage logistics or treat it like a big deal. After all, it worked out for them in the GREAT PATRIOTIC WAR, right? Clearly their system works just fine. No need to think about it too hard.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Check how much aid was sent even before 1942
                sure
                >1941
                >2% of total lend lease
                >1942
                >14% of total lend lease
                germany lost at the end of winter 41-42 so i guess if the soviets didn't have that 4% they would of collapsed. im not trying to discredit the allies, lend lease was very important and saved millions upon millions of lives and cut many years off the war but to say it was war winning is false and is only parroted because of the way russia is now
                >inb4 zhukov or stalin quote
                they were just being nice. bad optics to come out and say "yeah we didn't need you guys actually"
                >Russians can't even conquer a country with half the GDP of Bangladesh
                when did i mention russia jackass. the russian federation is not the ussr. if it had been germany fighting the RSFSR then they would of kicked the door in and collapsed the gov like they said. you people literally cant go 5 seconds without sperging about russia

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >>1941
                >>2% of total lend lease
                >>1942
                >>14% of total lend lease
                Allied aid started coming in the moment Germany decided they didn't want to murder the rest of Europe with the communists like they did with Poland. Although there are mentions of it there are very few records of the actual numbers since most contemporary studies focus on lend-lease and the aid that was shipped starting from the ratification of Lend Lease. If those numbers were ever added, you'd find it would be significantly more than that.
                >germany lost at the end of winter 41-42
                They lost the war in North Africa, where they used up most of their resources and modern equipment. What was spent in North Africa by the Germans wasn't being used to kill more Soviets. Not only did the Allies send aid they also paid in blood by opening a second front so the Soviets wouldn't further bumble their way into being pushed to the other side of the Volga.
                >inb4 the Soviets killed more Germans
                That's what happens when you shoot surrendering soldiers and unarmed civilians. Deaths tend to rack up.
                >>inb4 zhukov or stalin quote
                >they were just being nice
                >Source: Trust me, bro
                Let's see, who am I supposed to believe, the people that actually got the aid or some anon from some Vietnamese basket weaving forum's opinion on 'what they actually meant'. Not to mention there's also a quote from Khruschev begrudgingly admitting they would have been BTFO'd if not for US aid. This was at the height of the Cold War mind you.
                >when did i mention russia jackass.
                >you people literally cant go 5 seconds without sperging about russia
                Black person you're in a thread about the Russian invasion.
                Why mention the Soviets in a thread about an entirely different country? Unless you're the one equating the two of them of course.

                But the point still stands. The entire Russian sphere

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Allied aid started coming in the moment Germany decided they didn't want to murder the rest of Europe with the communists like they did with Poland. Although there are mentions of it there are very few records of the actual numbers since most contemporary studies focus on lend-lease and the aid that was shipped starting from the ratification of Lend Lease. If those numbers were ever added, you'd find it would be significantly more than that.
                if this aid was as massive as you say there would be mention of hard number somewhere. also 40-pre barb 41 lend lease to the ussr was just trade paid with spanish gold no?
                >They lost the war in North Africa, where they used up most of their resources and modern equipment.
                ive literally never heard this argument before. the dak consisted of a handful of german and italian divisions with tanks numbering in the hundreds. the entire african campaign was seen by hitler as a sideshow i dont understand why you think they were sending their best equipment there. thats just patently false. the second front that the allies opened was the italian one and at that point the war was already even more over. also the allies didn't open the african front it was there day one
                >>inb4 the Soviets killed more Germans
                >That's what happens when you shoot surrendering soldiers and unarmed civilians. Deaths tend to rack up.
                what are you trying to say here? the african front was more important? the soviets killed more because there were more germans there. waaaaay more, in fact
                >khruschchev quote
                you dont have to believe me its just what i believe. fwiw it being the height of the cold war would give him all the more reason to say something favorable.
                >Black person you're in a thread about the Russian invasion.
                my original comment was about how ive seen this argument more and more in the past couple months. i did not bring up ww2 first.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/pPLx6Qx.png

                [...]
                - would have collapsed if not for the US coming in to save their asses with competent logistics.

                my entire point is this is not true. the paltry amount of lend lease from 41-early 42 was not enough to win or lose anything. now how many more years it would of taken and how much harder it would of been on russia is a different conversation but there was no saving germany from inevitable loss after the russian counteroffensive from moscow. and even if you dont believe that there was no coming back from getting destroyed from urANUS later that year

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The delusional idea that the war ended in 41’ isn’t doing your arguments any favors

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                This is the end point of Russian education, complete disconnect from reality

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                99% of all trucks soviets used to move anything was Studebaker, which was superior to piece of shit Soviets produced. USA given Soviets million of winter clothes so they don't freeze innwinter like Russias currently are, millions of tones of canned food so soldiers don't die from hunger, ALL soviet high octane fuel, thousands of locomotives and even helped building Soviet factories

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                This is chilling.

                1. Wrong about the year

                2. Wrongly believing percentages without context could possibly tell a full story. For example:

                99% of all trucks soviets used to move anything was Studebaker, which was superior to piece of shit Soviets produced. USA given Soviets million of winter clothes so they don't freeze innwinter like Russias currently are, millions of tones of canned food so soldiers don't die from hunger, ALL soviet high octane fuel, thousands of locomotives and even helped building Soviet factories

                3. Ignoring the fact that EVEN IF PERCENTAGES TOLD THE FULL STORY, just knowing aid is coming allowed the USSR to more freely burn through their existing supplies

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/2AasNJT.png

                >>1941
                >>2% of total lend lease
                >>1942
                >>14% of total lend lease
                Allied aid started coming in the moment Germany decided they didn't want to murder the rest of Europe with the communists like they did with Poland. Although there are mentions of it there are very few records of the actual numbers since most contemporary studies focus on lend-lease and the aid that was shipped starting from the ratification of Lend Lease. If those numbers were ever added, you'd find it would be significantly more than that.
                >germany lost at the end of winter 41-42
                They lost the war in North Africa, where they used up most of their resources and modern equipment. What was spent in North Africa by the Germans wasn't being used to kill more Soviets. Not only did the Allies send aid they also paid in blood by opening a second front so the Soviets wouldn't further bumble their way into being pushed to the other side of the Volga.
                >inb4 the Soviets killed more Germans
                That's what happens when you shoot surrendering soldiers and unarmed civilians. Deaths tend to rack up.
                >>inb4 zhukov or stalin quote
                >they were just being nice
                >Source: Trust me, bro
                Let's see, who am I supposed to believe, the people that actually got the aid or some anon from some Vietnamese basket weaving forum's opinion on 'what they actually meant'. Not to mention there's also a quote from Khruschev begrudgingly admitting they would have been BTFO'd if not for US aid. This was at the height of the Cold War mind you.
                >when did i mention russia jackass.
                >you people literally cant go 5 seconds without sperging about russia
                Black person you're in a thread about the Russian invasion.
                Why mention the Soviets in a thread about an entirely different country? Unless you're the one equating the two of them of course.

                But the point still stands. The entire Russian sphere

                - would have collapsed if not for the US coming in to save their asses with competent logistics.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Germany lost 4 years before the war ended
                Amazing

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The delusional idea that the war ended in 41’ isn’t doing your arguments any favors

                This is the end point of Russian education, complete disconnect from reality

                im sorry that i dont compensate for all of your moronation when typing. what i obviously meant was the war was unwinnable for germany and thus lost. they failed to destroy the red army and the united states officially joined. this is literally the consensus among ww2 historians

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That’s gotta be the dumbest shit yet

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/AZBwF2r.jpg

                >Germany didn’t beat Russia 4 years before the war ended
                >therefore American lend lease was pointless

                I love these posts, gets called moronic multiple times, and just doubles down each time, amazing

                >https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveforbes/2016/03/01/why-they-stuck-with-hitler/?sh=4c2ba2679762
                >--In 1941, just before Pearl Harbor, Hitler's armaments minister and long-time trusted confidant Fritz Todt told the Führer that "this war can no longer be won by military means,"
                >https://www.wearethemighty.com/mighty-history/the-battle-that-convinced-german-generals-they-lost-world-war-ii/
                >When asked by a Soviet prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials, when German leaders knew the war was lost, the former head of the German High Command, Wilhelm Keitel told him succinctly, “Moscow.”
                /k/ knows more than keitel and todt and almost all ww2 historians. read a book for once in your life

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Ww2 historians believed Russian numbers and stories. Reminder that now Enemies at the gates is most historically accurate film, long criticized for depicting false idea of human wave charges that Soviets simply didn't do

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Look at the link full quote doesn't match the idea he was pushing.
                >In 1941, just before Pearl Harbor, Hitler's armaments minister and long-time trusted confidant Fritz Todt told the Führer that "this war can no longer be won by military means," because Germany couldn't match the growing production of the U.S. (which was providing more and more materiel to Britain and Russia), not to mention the increasing output of the Soviet Union and Great Britain. Todt recommended that Hitler negotiate the best deal he could and end the war.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You just don’t stop do you?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                your literally choking on my wiener rn

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You pajeet shills (the Russians are busy elsewhere being rimmed by Serbs) brought it on with your historic ignorance.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Germany didn’t beat Russia 4 years before the war ended
                >therefore American lend lease was pointless

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I love these posts, gets called moronic multiple times, and just doubles down each time, amazing

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              That’s a new cope

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            T food?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              that's food weighed on tons. VatBlack folk are literally biting the hand that fed them and now they're suffering the consequences.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            US sent a bunch of useless Thompsons with no ammo packed in Stuart tanks.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            It gets even more nuts. The US sent 3x the amount of food to the USSR as the entire USSR produced. 3/4 of their food came from the United States. They would have literally starved to death without the United States, which IMO is the greatest crime in American history.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              yeah. Saving their diseased asses was the greatest geopolitical disaster of the 20th century. Should have let the germans do their thing and focused all of that material on supplying own troops to then mop up the germans from at least western euro.

              No vatnik union means no Maos gang managing to overpower the nationalist china (taiwan) which also means no best korea. North Vietnam would have been pure insurgency and maybe the vietnam war would have never even taken place with direct burger involvement since the main thesis behind it was the domino theory. No maoist china also means no Khmer Rouge slaughterhouse in cambodia that killed almost a third of its population in four short years. Disgraced marxist in general mean a lot less moronation in western societies like woketards.

              There are more direct happenings that would have completely or at least partially changed with the destruction of the USSR and the german Reich, even if it managed to take the USSR place in east euro, would have never managed to cause so much misery on the global scale due to inherent low value ideological attraction. Unlike the marxist fairy tale that lures in simpleton morons with promises of a nice fairy tale world that is just beyond the next mountain of skulls.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Russians can't even conquer a country with half the GDP of Bangladesh.
            fun fact: Russia has a smaller population then bangladesh

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          They're coming back to their senses after all the commie propaganda

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You're just noticing it now, or maybe people around you are finally getting aware of it.
          In the east, things are different.
          It went from a widely accepted fact in the USSR to quickly getting memoryholed and declared a form of wrongthink after the KGB took over in the 90s.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It's a response to gopniks and their street shitter fan club hallucinating that Stalin and Kruschev did not openly acknowledge Lend-Lease saved their bacon.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Because it’s true.
          Also I’ve been saying it for years.
          Now russia boos and tankies are BTFO for even the every man to know this.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Eh, it was extremely significant but US analysts have a more nuanced view that it actually hastened Germany's defeat rather than saving the USSR.
            The thinking is that Lend Lease didn't save Moscow and Russia would just have taken much much longer to field a new offensive army while holding Germany at Stalingrad or something.

            The estimate is that the war would have lasted maybe 3-4 years longer and a LOT more Soviets would have died.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I don't think that in a "No lend lease" scenario, that the USSR is exterminated, but it's entirely possible that they become a wholly TransUral polity and that Germany can consolidate their holdings in the East, especially if they can negotiate in the West. Eventually Germany will have to strip the east bare enough that the USSR might be able to break back into the Russian heartland, but a diminished USSR (and, importantly, a USSR alienated enough that the West doesn't send aid) changes the diplomatic landscape in the West, and a negotiated peace in the west in 42 or 43 before the USSR can dislodge the Germans would be the stake in the heart of the USSR as a European power.

              Obviously a lot has to change for this to be possible.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                There was no peace to be negotiated with the allies, they were clear on an unconditional surrender. Anything else would just delay and let Germany rebuild and Hitler had broken every treaty and agreement he had made.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Lend lease literally saved “the soviets” they would have never been able to remain functioning with out it, they would have collapsed as a coherent force.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          it’s because of the second land lease - to Ukraine. People just learned what it is and what it was.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          it’s because of the second land lease - to Ukraine. People just learned what it is and what it was.

          morons.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What is lend-lease
      What is Germany fighting on 3 fronts vs stalin's 1?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      He also had at least three competent generals unlike Putin.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Zhukov
        Rokossovsky
        Konev?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          My favorite is Vatutin
          >Named the Grandmaster by the Germans because he was an epic chess player and felted them at every turn
          >Stalin's favourite & called him by his patronymic
          >Gets killed in some random artillery strike hitting his motorcade
          Life isn't fair bros

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Gets killed in some random artillery strike hitting his motorcade
            actually he was wounded in an ambush by Ukrainian insurgents behind the lines and died of sepsis in hospital. I think he was the highest-ranked Soviet officer to be killed by the UPA.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      let's hope putin succeeds even harder and get 30+ million russtards killed

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Opens a time portal in 1940

      𝅘𝅥𝅮 Come with meeeeee, and you'll seeeee a world of pure retaaardaaation. 𝅘𝅥𝅮

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Putin is not Stalin, nor is the Russian Federation the Soviet Union.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Stalin executed incompetent generals and replaced then with fresh up and coming talent. Putin out his moronic old farts on a carousel of uselessness.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Stalin executed the competent generals and the fresh upcoming talent too.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Well, obviously. It's hard to tell who's who when all you have is hammer. But the point is that he didn't have 5 morons that he simply rotated around.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Stalin executed incompetent generals
        Because the Red Army were where the purge started, it was also less severe. Purged officers, both competent and incompetent, were mostly only forced to resign.
        They got brought back and rehabilitated to help win the war.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >succeded

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Did Stalin really die like that or is it a Google bomb?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >At approximately 11:00 p.m. on 1 March, his housekeeper cautiously entered his room and found him lying on the floor, wearing his pajama trousers and a shirt. He was unconscious, breathing heavily, incontinent, and unresponsive to attempts to rouse him.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The USSR is deader than a pickled herring like the Warsaw Pact it begat. Moderns don't keep track of those changes or the differing talent pools.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      All these anons saying muh lend lease muh fronts are coping. Stalin won because Germany's factories got buck broken by allied strategic bombing, and because the Axis had been running pathetically low on oil and manpower as early as 1942.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        So the Soviets' victory still only happened because the US and UK carried the team, only in a different way?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        So they still suceeded cause of the Allies (bombing German factories, Romanian Oil Fields, Embargo from the US (80% of the worlds oil)). And manpower wasnt an issue in 1942, material was, like armored vehicles and trains. Which is because of Anglo-American bombing.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    oh no, not Doctor Killslaughter

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Proffesor Apocalypse next?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Count Stabmurder.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >go to Dwarf Fortress name generator
          > https://www.d0rfforge.com/
          >go to settings and enable only all the nasty sounding word groups
          >press generate
          Congrats, that’s how you get a Russian military commander names just as much as you want

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >It is I, Drownedduck of Murderskull, come to steal you wheelbarrows, mwhahahahaha!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Not to worry Commodore Black Plague is in charge now

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Rumours say he will be replaced by general Glovisov

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Really? Because I heard the new theater commander is named I. Browizrazed.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What homosexual took over?

    General Buttraper? General Butcher of Edge? The mad bear? What moronic nickname does he have?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      General K

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Gerasimov himself is the new overall commander. Imagine the US fricking up an invasion of Mexico so badly that the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs is getting told to personally run the show.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The second time no less. First Putin sent him to oversee the Izium pincer in April but Ukes almost blew him to bits. Now he’s supposed to run the entire operation.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        So no nicknames?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It's just Gerasimov for now. Maybe we'll get one in a few days.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Unfortunately for Gerasimov, Valeriy read his book!

        >Zaluzhniy: "I was raised on Russian military doctrine, and I still think that the science of war is all located in Russia. I learned from Gerasimov. I read everything he ever wrote...He is the smartest of men, and my expectations of him were enormous.”

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >and I still think that the science of war is all located in Russia
          Guess old mate Valeriy isn't much of a thinker then.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            From the vids on the topic that I've seen the issue doesn't seem to be R*ssian doctrine so much as it is their own lack of adherence to it (e.g. not allocating the intended resources because of corruption, culture of lying leading to inaccurate information etc.).

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Wait they fired another one? But why? Russians have been spamming this board for three days straight that the war was as good as over since they managed to advance halfway through a hamlet with a prewar population of 10,000.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >but why
      It’s a sign that they raised their eyebrows.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Because Russian military knows exact extent of their losses. They didn't get so far by using brains but throwing even more than usual number of soldiers

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        So you're saying he didn't produce enough mobik meat for monke.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Even their command structure is organized in "human" waves.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    why are you guys this buttblasted about russia? Are you europoors? identify as homosexuals? what is it?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Because they are annoying c**ts and deserve to starve

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >c**t
        europoor word

        Literally been the vermin of Europe since the time of the Great Khans passed (except for that OTHER group... you know the one...) and it's past time the historical accident of their unnatural state is fixed

        >vermin of europe
        sounds like europoor to me.

        why did we had to help you in 1776? we should have cozied up to anglos

        >frog gay
        okay.
        Lol, wouldn't france be a bigger issue than Russia with the importing of terrorist and africans in masses to a borderless organization.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Trump lost.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          not a frog dipshit

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >frog
          The American Revolutionaries had three superpowers on their side; France, Spain and Netherlands. Technically Russia too, who refused to help. Oh and Poland. Another superpower.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >late 18th century
            >Poland is a superpower
            Oh i'm laffin

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >spain
            >netherlands
            >poland
            >refusing to help is helping
            kek moron

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I know you are a RusBlack person so I would like to remind you how you have lost against jihadis in the first chechen war and now their troops are raping your mongoloid people

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Chechens are mongoloids too.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, this.
        Even if I wasn't Pro-Ukrainian, I'd still be Anti-Russian purely because of how horrible their attitude here has been. I was pretty indifferent towards Russia at the start of the conflict, but now I just want to see all of the arrogant bastards eat shit.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Russia arrogance and self-delusion has been off-the-charts in this conflict.

          Ukrainians have been far more dignified.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Literally been the vermin of Europe since the time of the Great Khans passed (except for that OTHER group... you know the one...) and it's past time the historical accident of their unnatural state is fixed

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >except for that OTHER group... you know the one...

        The Irish?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      why did we had to help you in 1776? we should have cozied up to anglos

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Trying playing Foxhole. You get a whole new understanding of chinks and vatniks.

      Russians are probably the most annoying c**ts I have ever encountered, online and in person. And I'm Australian.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      cause russians are the Black folk of europe

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They are annoying and unstable and in the long run it’s probably cheaper just to get rid of them all and turn Russia into a big fenced off coal mine
      But that is just my moderate opinion

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They are an extremely barbaric and annoying nation who should have had a reckoning shortly after WW2 but then we were too lazy and they got nukes and it was too fricking late. Now they actually think they were the good guys or something, unlike Germany who owned up because they got ass whooped and are better off as a result.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It’s funny how Germany’s deserved whooping had such a long effect on them that after a certain point you start feeling like ”it’s OK, you have atoned enouh, don’t need to be so meek anymore” towards them, but then Russia has never really got the shock that it deserves. I’m not saying that WWII was easy for them, but they’d need a total loss, a total ”reborn from the figurative ashes” moment for their society to finally get over their eternal Tsar / boyars power structure that ensures that life in Russia is and will always be shit.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      your nation is an a priori abomination and shall be reduced to a landfill for the good of civilization. dont worry, we'll have a visitors center with prokofiev and tchaikovsky playing over little speakers, you'll even be allowed to get the ethnic russians to say passages from tolstoy and dostoevsky for baggies of buckwheat.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        based cultural artifact preserver and moderate gentleman

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You fired another general?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's the better alternative to keeping the same moron at the helm any longer than 60 days. Lamentable that their search of a non idiot general is futile and is doomed for failure, because military academy they finished 30 years ago was already 30 years out of date back then, and having finished one they think they know best and won't acknowledge that strategic failures are their own.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      these two look like such agreeable chill guys kek

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        i wish for an independent tuva so that great shaman shoygu can collect his pieces of bark unbothered by the modern world

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Russian bros...I thought Dr Apocalypse was going to crush the hohols, just like in Avengers,..all these memes, were they for nothing...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Dont worry zizster! The Avengers will come and save SMO! Thats what always happens in my secondhand T-shirt I got from UNICEF relief workers!

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Black person he was literally a bank robbing thug from the sticks and the (few) intellectuals he kept around laughed at him behind his back for his redneck accent

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      well, he was supposed to be priest, which means that he could read and writte which still would have put him far above most of the russians back them. also there were exerts from the interviews that mention his thick georgian accent

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >redneck accent
      Wrong, he had the usual Georgian accent. Russian equivalent of redneck accent is Kuban accent, which sounds basically the same as regular Ukrainian language sans the vocabulary.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >it turned out that the second theatre general, Comrade Sergey "Armageddon" Surovikin, was a traitor and an enemy agent
    >I present you his substitute: Vanya "Super Nuclear Holocaust" Vladimorovich
    >he committed 100 different war crimes in africa and the middle east
    >he killed 15 of his own men by skinning them alive and fricking their eyesockets while they were still breathing
    >he wrestles bears barehanded as part of his daily routine
    >he will spend the next two weeks being embarrassed on the battlefield and the next 2 inefficiently bombing civilians 1000+ kilometers from the front
    >by the end of the 4th week, it will turn out that the third theatre general, Vanya "Super Nuclear Holocaust" Vladimirovich, was a traitor and an enemy agent
    >I present you his substitute...

    More like armageddon outta there lmao

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you kiled me

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    That's great and everything but a source would be nice

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://tass.com/politics/1561153

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Russia bros can you post the General Armageddon laser eyes and sunglasses memes in here?

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Butcher Of Alleppo
    fails to close Cauldron, Sacked
    >General Armageddon
    can't protect Kherson, Sacked
    >The Skull Stealer of The Steppes
    Reassigned to bureau of port inspection in the Central Military District after Zaporizhia route.
    >Admiral Megadeath
    Resigned after Sevastopol bombings
    >Commander Murder Hellscape
    Imprisoned on treason charges after recapture of Mariupol.
    >Lieutenant General Holocaust
    Dies after plane crashes from weight of stolen first aid kits.
    >Vladmir Yaga DeSadesvich, Grand Ion of the Sacred Flesh and Impaler of fresh womb-givings, terror of a thousand kingdoms.
    Shoigu convinces Putin to call himself something else.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >DeSadesvich
      Thought this was a DeSantis-joke at first

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    is Gerasimov an ethnic Tatar ?

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >they doubted General Armageddon

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      yes! now with laser eyes

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/eAuVXwZ.jpg

      The Russian army has been undefeated ever since Mr Armageddon took charge.

      >someone spent time making this, only for the moron to achieve literally nothing then lose Kherson and get replaced by a guy who looks like this

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >achieve literally nothing
        Not true. He stole a racoon.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The Racoon of Kherson he’s the key to control the universe.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Retreated without dying AND abused a zoo animal? Truly a victory of Stalingrad proportions.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Agent Raccoonavitch is a Yook plant, feeding the AFU inside info.

          Gerasimov really looks like a sitcom character, why is he even a commander

          >Gerasimov really looks like a sitcom character, why is he even a commander
          Its not like the Russkies have any better options; but you are right, Gerasimov is a goofy-looking frick....the Kramer of their siloviki shitshow sitcom that's gonna get cancelled after 1, maybe 2 seasons.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Agent Raccoonavitc
            tell him it was me, I want him to know it was me

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              When you get to your dacha, you're going to take off that uniform ain't ya?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >replaced by a guy who looks like this
        I fail to see the problem, a door handle will probably be the most competent leadership the Russian army has seen since the start of this conflict.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          underrated

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Frankly Gerasimov at least looks like a normal human. General Armageddon looks like a disgusting fat slob and the Butcher had those dead eyes.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >The Butcher

          Which one, lol? The Butcher Of Syria or the Butcher Of Mariupol?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Those are two different people?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Gerasimov really looks like a sitcom character, why is he even a commander

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/8A8HtyJ.jpg

          Agent Raccoonavitch is a Yook plant, feeding the AFU inside info.

          [...]
          >Gerasimov really looks like a sitcom character, why is he even a commander
          Its not like the Russkies have any better options; but you are right, Gerasimov is a goofy-looking frick....the Kramer of their siloviki shitshow sitcom that's gonna get cancelled after 1, maybe 2 seasons.

          They're invading a country ruled by a comedian and are getting wrecked, probably started thinking the war runs on comedy rules.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Gerasimov reminds me of William B Davis.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          He looks like Turgidson from Dr. Strangelove

          Why do they use those nicknames?

          Can you imagine western media repositioning that "Butcher of Belgrade" will be replced by "Crowd-strafer of Mogadishu" so now US forces will take off their gloves in Fallujah.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >if only you knew how confusing things really are

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I think he looks a bit like Hans Landry there.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      more like general bald cuck idolised by lefty troons

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Kek, nice /k/ope. Armageddon now has his wife now has multiple other men to assist his romantic life and this is supposed to be a bad thing according to NAFO troons?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >for me it was a colonel calling him 'general armacondom'

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >I never said it was a *ukrainian* Armageddon...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Armageddinouttahere!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      More like General Abandonkherson
      Carlos.jpg

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    because there is only one zar

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The Russian army has been undefeated ever since Mr Armageddon took charge.

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So, how long before Pootin himself assumes direct control?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Frick, someone more talented than me needs to make a Harbinger “assuming direct control” edit with the screaming Monke face

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is this what all of the vatnik propaganda spamming was about over the last couple of days? Their woman and child murdering death commander got fired?

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Some ukies got wasted on video today didnt they?

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why do they use those nicknames?

    Can you imagine western media repositioning that "Butcher of Belgrade" will be replced by "Crowd-strafer of Mogadishu" so now US forces will take off their gloves in Fallujah.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Crowd-strafer of Mogadishu
      Utterly and insanely based.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Anything but the "wiener-pointer of Abu Ghraib"...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Russians seem to almost literally get off on being the bad guys, for some reason

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It isn't good guy versus bad guy to them. It is weak guy versus stronk guy.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          A real strong guy probably wouldn't feel the need to nickname himself "Lord Field Marshall Skullfricker, the Grand Calamity of Shitholistan" after blowing up a pygmy orphanage like Russians do.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Putin has... interesting ideas about what defines strength. Back in the mid 2010s when news was going around about how Israel's president had raped a bunch of women, Putin's immediate response was to compliment him for his "strength".
            >"He turned out to be a strong man, raped 10 women," the Russian president was quoted by Russian media as saying at a meeting in Moscow with Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert. "I never would have expected it of him. He has surprised us all, we all envy him!"
            https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/oct/20/russia.tomparfitt

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Raping defenseless women

              That's not strength. That's just being such a fricking failure at attracting women you have to force sex on them.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                This, imagine being president and women still not wanting to have sex with you.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              putin used to be a funny dude from like 00-10. dictator syndromes a b***h

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Its like putting "Alpha Male" as part of your Twitter-handle or whatever.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Bullies always have to wear their badassery on their chest. That's why you get a career general with 0.7 campaigns under his belt getting badass nicknames like General Nuclear Skullfricker, it's all posturing. Strong man needs strong name, strong name makes strong man stronger.

      Meanwhile, in a Western army you can guarantee that a 4 star who's spent his entire adulthood in uniform with a nickname like General Little b***h Toes would wipe half the globe while making sure his troops had ice cream ships on schedule the entire war.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        ^This actually checks out.
        See:
        >General Carl Spaatz, commander of the US strategic bombing campaign against Germany; nickname "Tooey".
        >Oberst Erich Hartmann, the highest scoring fighter ace in history; nickname "Bubi".
        >General Mathew Ridgeway, US Army Chief of Staff and Supreme Allied Commander Europe; nickname "Old Iron breasts".
        >Admiral Harold Stark, the US Chief of Naval Operations during WW2; nickname "Betty".
        >Julian Byng, 1st Viscount Byng of Vimy, commander of the Canadian Corps in WW1 and victor of Cambrai; nickname "Bungo."

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Because the west isnt evil or a villian.

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Can be any worse that Vietnam or Afghanistan or Iraq though, where the worlds only superpower was whipped by some jungle scouts, some goat herders, and some out of work sand people.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      GOOD MORNING SIR

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Amidoinirite.gif

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >am i dionirite
          Is that some type of mineral?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      America fully occupied Iraq in under a month. Afghanistan took days. Russia can't even dislodge Ukrainians from Donbass in open warfare.

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If you don't know what is going on how does the enemy?

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Throw enough shit at the wall and it will eventually stick I suppose.

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Armageddout
    Armageddone
    Armagedon't

    what else is there

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Armagetgone

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Armagerd HARMARS!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      armagetdunkedon

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Armagetthefrickouttahere

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Russia is farming experience for them.They are min-maxing and will have a couple of experienced grand marshals while ukraine only got one.

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >I will terror bomb the Ukrainians, it worked so well on those Syrians without an airforce, anti-air, or an actual army/command structure
    >what? Why isn’t this working?
    Honestly I think he’s being used as a fall guy here, the loss of Kherson + no Russian wins since is too big of a deal. Also they’re running low on rockets, they’ve gone from every day to every other day to now once every 10 days. Terror bombing with rockets didn’t work and they don’t have the stockpiles to keep on doing it forever.

    They really thought that the Ukrainians would break in a week but all they’ve done now is nearly exhaust their stockpiles for a lot of missile types.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >They really thought that the Ukrainians would break in a week but all they’ve done now is nearly exhaust their stockpiles
      this.

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine cannot be of predictions if own army has no idea what is doing

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So our Lord terminated Armageddon again?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Do you ever wonder whether fate is interfering with Russia?
      Ukraine seems to get every break just at the last minute. Even the weather.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >everyone and their mother is sending tons of supplies, money, and high tech assistance
        >Anon chalks it up to fate
        If anything Russia is the one favored by fate here.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          As much as I'm aware NATO has shit tons of hidden capability I don't think they have the power to make Europe have the mildest winter in history and frick Russia with arctic conditions just when the fate of Eastern Europe hinges on energy usage.

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Firing the commanders you enter a war with once you work out who can hack it and who can't appears to be a fairly standard and necessary thing looking at WW2. In the case of Russia though, I think this is more down to political instability and/or Putin playing chess games with Kremlin factions.

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Did general apathy take over?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      when will he get a turn?

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This shit is funny as frick to me considering how hard the russians were hyping him up, they even made fricking model kits of him and now he's been replaced before they even got the chance to be released

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >they even made fricking model kits of him and now he's been replaced before they even got the chance to be released

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They get coffins!?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          zinc coffins for the absolute geniuses who decided to dig trenches in the red forest

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        That truck needs washing machines and the diorama ground needs more decomposing mobiks.

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Anyone know what /chug/s cope is with the replacement?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Trust the plan
      Z

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >soledar fallen
    >bakhmut about to fall
    >luhansk offensive completely stalled and bogged down
    >uaf suffering horrendous losses among their best formations
    >11 months later west just barely starting to send 50 bradleys which will do frick all
    oh no no no ukrainebros we got too wienery

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >1 small town down
      >about 1000 to go
      gl hf zigger

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >bakhmut about to fall
      2 more weeks?

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    you don't want to get left holding the hot potato

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Gerasimov looks like the dumbest, softest moron of the bunch
    But Zaluzhnyi called him a military genius from an older generation, so we'll see
    My guess is that even if he was a good 20th century general, he can't keep up with modern warfare

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ask President Lincoln.

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Putin is Sauron. Zelenksky is Saruman. Above them is Melkor or Gothmog or some other israelite

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    https://twitter.com/MarkGaleotti/status/1613225252900966401

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So…a little confused over the mobik thing. When the "partial" mobilization was announced people were reporting talk of one week of training as being good enough…but are they actually giving them a lot more?

    Anyway, will it really matter? Over the last several months it seemed like Russians wasn’t even trying to fight on the frontline. Separatists are doing all the actual fighting whilst Russia spams artillery. So, when the Ukes built up a critical mass and went on that broad offensive — the Russians didn’t fight, they packed up and left their positions even dumping lots of vehicles. If the separatists can’t hold them back the Russians won’t step up, they run. Russian military now seems like it’s defeated as real fighting force. Probably close to open insurrection due to horrible morale, low-quality minority peasants, etc. The regime is struggling on the solution. Giving the mobiks more training seems like a desperate attempt to try and fix this broken army. Guys in the regime are trying to cover their asses by blaming the lack of training. Probably.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >but are they actually giving them a lot more?
      Some mobiks were sent from their gathering points straight into the trenches. Some were left behind to get training. It looks like over past weeks they've been deploying the leftover mobiks. To give some space in the system for new mobiks and to finally start using those.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It doesn't matter if the training is a week or a month, what matters is that the quality of the training is total dogshit. Endless stories of firing a bare handful of rounds at a range if they're lucky and maybe digging a few holes.
      >Russian military now seems like it’s defeated as real fighting force. Probably close to open insurrection due to horrible morale, low-quality minority peasants, etc
      Yes to the former, maybe to the latter. They're fricked as a football bat but you should never understimate the willingness of russians to die like sheep without raising a bleat of protest. But their morale is totally in the toilet especially after the New Year HIMARS strike and I can see a future where more russian goodwill gestures degenerate into full blown routs out of Ukraine.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >never understimate the willingness of russians to die like sheep without raising a bleat of protest.

        Wouldn't that be a blyat of protest?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Wouldn't that be a blyat of protest?
          Kek

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I wish a slow and painful death on all the shitters that spammed those cringe-ass threads of General Cuckmageddon

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Troop rotation.

  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    leads to different strategies, campaigns on the battlefield -> harder to anticipate

  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Whats the strategic advantage of shillposting on /k/ instead of dying in a trench defending Bakhmut?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      But doesn't Gerasimov have other stuff to do?
      Are we back to having no theatre commander or has Russia given up on all other theatres?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Anon I'm not sure if you've noticed but in order to have theatre commanders you need...multiple theatres.
        The russians have lost the Kharkiv and Kiev theatres, as well as the Kherson theatre. Their only offensive command is occurring in a region that has been (and remains) stuck in deadlock for 9 years. The only reason why they can't pull back willingly is because as soon as Mariupol goes back to Ukraine, supply to Crimea becomes a literal nightmare since their bridge remains deader than bionicle.
        They've literally painted themselves into the worst corner you can be stuck in in a "operational" sense. Their missile reserve was dedicated to bombing civilian targets for months now when the correct move (which could've been executed at ANY TIME) was to attack Soledar to threaten the position (a factor that even fricking Perun, a bean counter from Australia, pointed out).
        By every measure the smartest move on the Russian side at this point would be to figure out the best way to pull out of Crimea. The front, as it currently stands, is simply not sustainable - if decreased artillery shelling is due to availability (as opposed to Russia shifting away from offensive operations), the decreased availability of artillery simply means that Ukrainians will get to pick any target along a massively long line and cut off supplies to Crimea at any point, after which a repeat of the Kherson offensive can be conducted.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        What would that be when the Russian Federation is not the USSR, has nil global power projection and in every war it's natural for generals to enhance their careers with combat commands? You're moronic even for a brownoid so how did you find this place?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      How does this solve russian institutional incompetence?

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >OP-pic
    Who is this? I can't remember. Must be one more NATO fake.

  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They can wait for their ulti's cd.

  58. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Command rotation is more important than troop rotation

  59. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >What is the strategic advantage of changing your supreme commander every sixty fricking days?

    mmmmm roasted fall guys

  60. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Hey. It worked the last time we tried it.

  61. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    SHUT THE FRICK UP POST GUNS YOU homosexual I DO NOT FRICKING CARE ABOUT SLAV Black folk DYING
    have a nice day

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Sneed.

  62. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You don't get it. The bald one had a mobility bonus, where's the new one has a special rule where he negates critical wounds

  63. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    bump

  64. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I actually believe russian generals only pretend to be moronic because they will get windowed for both massively fricking and being too successful. So the best option is to just trade blows

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *