What could break the stalemate of a peer conflict?

>trench warfare but with ATGM, drone, and minefields, because nobody could gain full air or numerical superiority
>We are seeing Ukrainian tendency to put ERA blocks on everything
>Russians came up with turtle tanks and APCs
>Meanwhile, Isareli installed both APS and jammers on AFVs, which are proven to be extremely effective.
Surely, there will be some kind of breakthrough in technology or tactics like tanks and infiltration tactics of WW1?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >stalemate
    It's not a stalemate when the opposing force seizes almost 20% of your country and you aren't able to take back any significant amount after almost a year and a half, that's just called losing

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >stalemate

      It's not a stalemate when you invade a country, lost 50% of the ground you captured, and are stuck with 80% of it uncaptured while losing gazillions of dudes to frontal assaults. That's just called losing.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I didn't read a word of your post as I was able to see the reddit spacing just scrolling down the page

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous
          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Welcome to PrepHole newbie, we have our own way of doing things.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              damn must be summer already, welcome to PrepHole buddy. stay in school

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Anon, I dont know if you have received elementary education, but literate people put space between paragraphs, did you learn to "write" in whatsapp?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No, we don't put spaces between paragraphs here when
            >the next line is green text
            because you don't need a space
            >because the green text makes it obvious
            that you're typing on a new line

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              you literally put a new line after each of those

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              god imagine being so autistic over formatting in a fricking text reply lmao. you sperg.
              oh
              no
              this hurts
              the sperg!!! the reddit is here!! xD i bet if we hooked a blood pressure cuff to you we could correlate spikes in your blood pressure with your eyes scanning the line breaks
              OH GOD
              DOCTOR HIS HEART IS AT 140BPM
              ITS RISING!!!

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Glavset still thinks that reddit is a trigger word on PrepHole
          Pathetic

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This is reddit spacing, moron

          Russia has embraced full attrition warfare, they don't care if they lose 6 gorillion or more

          Ukraine does not have 6 gorillion soldiers

          Even if Russia loses all of their tanks and armored vehicles in storage they'd just do mass golf cart assaults or buy back old stock from third world countries

          There's no mass mobilization outside of the yearly quotas, that only means they're sending gullible turd worlders to die

          Ukraine should start building underground ammunition factories that link beneath NATO countries

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >n you invade a country, lost 50% of the ground you captured, and are stuck with 80% of it uncaptured while losing

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >when you false equivalency

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          bros... the ragheads are so based.... why do we have to be white supremacists again...

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Are those those guys that beat the breaks off the Soviets and killed 10x more of them than the American troony troopers? What does it mean if you're 10x weaker than gays and trannies?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            your empire collapses.
            then again, Murica run away from the talibans too, while backed by a coalition of 72 countries. That's gays and trannies for you.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >America says its leaving
              >America leaves
              >ahahha you homosexuals lost the war! We win!

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Winning is up and leaving billions of dollars and military hardware to the enemy you've been too terrified to eradicate? The talichad are still killing mutt veterans by nature of their existence. Turns out even ZOGbots eventually feel bad about murdering babies and losing to goat herders

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >mutt
                >talichad
                Back to your hole bunkertroon

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No, that is pretty much the definition of a stalemate.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          No, a stalemate would be if neither can move forward or do much of anything to the enemy.
          As long as you're causing losses, it's not a stalemate, it's attrition warfare.
          You do not need to be moving forward on the ground to be depleting their warfighting resources.
          You can even retreat while still winning. The Battle of the Bulge was not a German victory.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >heh, atleast you haven't conquered our entire country
        I've seen a lot of /k/ope before but damn

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That's just a reminder that puccian invasion goes as scheduled. Now is the purging season tho.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        How much territory did Russia lose since all this began?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          How much territory did the US lose since they invaded Afghanistan?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Do you mean how much US soil, as determined by the US constitution, was captured by an invader? Zero.
            The Russian territory, on the other hand, is currently occupied by the poorest country in Europe and for the third year the mighty bear is unable to do anything about it.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              > anything
              except killing hundreds of thousands ukrainian heroes, but we're not allowed to talk about that.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                More like dead kids. Weve all seen the aftermath of puccia targeting apartments and hospitals with their shitty stovepipe missles.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's a lot like what Germany managed in WWI or Iraq managed in the Iran/Iraq war. Having your invasion turn into a futile forever war is losing.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah Iraq invaded a much larger country and stalled immediately. Germany was fighting countries that were greater in terms size, population and industrial output, and lost. The Russians are losing the way they lost the winter war.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >like tanks and infiltration tactics of WW1?
      Those didn't break the stalemate, though.
      Every time someone introduced some surprise new weapon or tactic in WW1, which happened about 20 times, it only gave a brief advantage before the other side duplicated it or found sufficient counters to stay in the fight.

      A widely predicted upcoming wunderwaffe is unjammable AI drones.
      Both sides are working on it at once, it's supposedly being used in limited numbers already. And by the time the tech gets good, everybody will have counters to it that work at least well enough.

      Literally how Germany won WW1

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >make unjammable drone
        >to ram it in tanks
        How long till people develope drones that kill drones?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          All FPV vids from both sides are an extreme case of Survivorship bias, they either miss, get jammed, shot down, or just fall apart flying most of time.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It is if the enemy has been attacking almost the entire time and the frontlines haven't shifted

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Germany didn't lost any german clay till late 44. I guess Hitler won then.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Hey, good to know that the US won in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan. I mean, none of them ever took land from us, we just left. That means our Special Military Operations were a success, right?

      Oh wait, could it be that causing hundreds of billions of dollars in damage and making it so the invader can't actually profitably USE any of the land he's taken means the invader is absorbing cost while having zero actual gains?
      You realize that being able to occupy land under artillery bombardment isn't any sort of a win, right? I mean, I don't ask my neighbors to start shelling my house so I can "win" by living in a hole in the ground. I win in life by NOT being under artillery bombardment, and then being able to use the land around me for profit and enjoyment.
      You only profit in peace. Taking land that puts you at war is a loss unless and until you can stop the war with the land still under your control and then start putting it to profitable civilian use.

      The Ukrainian land under Russian control is currently nothing but an albatross around Russia's neck. You have won absolutely nothing yet, you are only taking losses.

      I thought Russians were all supposed to be grandmaster chess players? How do you not know that sacrificing half your pieces just to make it to the 3rd rank isn't a win?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Did troops in troonystia ever leave their border? I still hate the fact that shithole exists

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Ukraine offered to invade it for Moldova but they declined

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Sad. I guess it will just sit there like another Kaliningrad that no one wants because it is just a total shithole full with slavs.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Germany lost WW1 while owning more than that of France and Russia

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's literally a stalemate

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >it's not a stalemate

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Russia is still losing.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Germany won WW1 because the 4 years stalemate happened inside French territory 😉

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    you need a sufficient concentration of violence that can move fast enough that it doesn't get attrited away by passive and reactionary measures

    aka an air force

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      And that's why Ukraine is cleaning up the Russian air defense in Crimea.

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    attrition takes time. more than 2 weeks. kill enough enemies and they'll eventually lose.
    > Israel, effective
    8 months and counting vs 30 000 sandBlack folk surrounded from all sides. This war is embarrassment for the israelites from start to (eventual) finish.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This isn’t a stalemate. Trading land slowly does not equate to a deadlock as if real war is a game in which you win when you clear the board. A stalemate in a real war is if both sides were losing the same amount of ability to continue vs the same sustainment limit. In WW1 the front moved very slowly but that hid the fact that the Central Powers were in fact losing badly. Same situation in this war. Look at war more of a contest between nations in terms of industry, financials and political willpower with the military aspect being the leading edge of that contest. Land CAN change hands rapidly but it doesn’t have to. No sane, honest analyst thinks Russia is losing or that Ukraine can realistically win with the current balance of power. Find me just ONE actual analyst who thinks otherwise and I’m willing to change my view on that.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You know they aren't going to, look at it this way, there is a great deal of dissonance when it comes to these things, what is more, it demands people to throw away emotional attachment and look at the cold data, and that always ends up with introspection. Imagine living your life holding to the idea your sacrifices at least made you a major military power and then face the current reality.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      since you're definition of actual analyst will just be one who agrees with you, there's no point

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >thinks Russia is losing or that Ukraine can realistically win
      Win/lose is a false dichotomy, though. In some wars everyone loses, in some wars everyone claims to win. It's an extension of politics, not a game where a trophy has to be awarded to a winner, like you said.
      If there's an eventual ceasefire near current lines, Russia loses because they pay an enormously higher domestic and international price than they expected for their 3-day SMO and fail to achieve their initial aims. They claim victory because they took territory.
      And then Ukraine loses because they pay a huge price just to keep existing with less land and people than before. They claim victory because they beat back the supposed #2 military power and made them lose.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Find me just ONE actual analyst who thinks otherwise and I’m willing to change my view on that.

      >NATO Chief Says Ukraine Can Still Win War Despite Russian Advances
      https://www.barrons.com/news/nato-chief-says-ukraine-can-still-win-war-despite-russian-advances-23a3f629
      >Ukraine could win with help from the West Michael Clarke Former Director General at RUSI and Professor of Defence Studies at Kings College London.

      >Ukraine Can Win a War of Attrition,
      https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/ukraine-can-win-war-attrition

      Idk what an "actual analyst"is though so *shrug*

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        None of them claim Ukraine is winning, only that Ukraine may be able to win with enough support — which is a true statement and not controversial. Stoltenberg in your link even said it’s "not too late" which implies that Ukraine is currently losing — although he’s not an analyst. Every serious analysis I’ve read says Ukraine can potentially win if they got enough support, but they are currently NOT receiving enough support. Is there any analyst which says Ukraine is winning?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          If you mean anyone claiming Ukraine is currently pushing Russia out, no, no one is claiming that. But being able to hold out with minimal support with the potential for retaking the initiative if external support grows adds up to a very good chance of winning over the long term.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Ukraine is currently facing 3 major problems:
            1) Lack of men to replace the soldiers who've been fighting for 2 years straight and need a break, but it's the easiest one to fix
            2) Lack of fortifications, partly due to not building them last year because they didn't expect the counteroffensive to fail, partly due to stealing the fricking funds for building them in the present, as the AFU units near Kharkiv will tell you
            3) The West's ban on using their weapons to shoot down the planes in Russia's territory, which would slow down Russia's advancing tremendously
            Tl;dr: currently Ukraine doesn't have the means to stop Russian troops from advancing. They can't hold out forever with just what they have at the moment.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >stop russian troops advancing
              see thats the thing zigger, you haven't been.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the Central Powers were in fact losing badly.
      No they weren't, at least not any more than the Entente. The French Army mutinied in 1917 and without the injection of fresh American troops to counter the returning Eastern Front vets the central powers very well might have won.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No, the Central Powers were done the moment the Spring Offensive failed, which the US played only a very tiny role in. The most you can say for the US is that they sped up the pace of the Allied counterattack, but it was still the European powers doing the vast majority of the fighting.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The spring offensive happened when it in did in response to the US joining the war as Germany wanted to land a decisive blow before American troops arrived in force, so indirectly they were responsible for Germany launching an all out 'this is it' attack which ultimately lost them the war

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        kek actual fricking lies
        is this what they teach americans in school?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >We didn't need those 900,000 troops anyway!

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Funny thing is the French mutiny didn’t stop the French soldiers from defending just telling officers to frick off if they were told to charge a fortified position

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >ukraine is a peer of russia
    if you told this to anybody 3 years ago they'd laugh in your face

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    > Meanwhile, Isareli installed both APS and jammers on AFVs, which are proven to be extremely effective.

    >tens if billions of USD in aid and counting
    >france, uk and us directly intervened
    >fighting militia armed only with light homemade weapons
    >failure on all fronts including intelligence October 7
    >none of the declared goals even remotely achieved
    >claim to have pacified a region only to have rickets launched at them from that region the next day
    >don’t even control 5% of Gaza after 8 months
    >damaged international image forever

    Yeah No ID(iaper)F are in deep shit

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >damaged international image forever
      Care to elaborate?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The IDF effectively ratified the generational shift in attitudes towards Israel going on in America and the West in general. Boomers were insanely pro-Israeli due to religious propaganda and other quirks like seeing them as 'underdogs' vs the Arabs in the 1960s. That support dropped about 20% per generation. Instead of trying to reverse the trend the IDF locked it in.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Biggest self-own in strategic history. Worse than Russia's invasion. All Israel needed to do was nothing and they'd have the world's sympathy, everyone would understand why peace with the Palestinians is impossible because they're literally animals, and it's not like they got back and hostages by force anyway.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        All the people who already hated Israel now hate Israel.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          > All the people who already hated Israel now hate Israel.
          But now it's official

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How hard would it be to seize and destroy Gaza's water supply and leave the Palestinians to mummify in a week?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Diaper forces are not capable of any ingenious tactics or breakthroughs.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I believe some international groups or some such organizations would classify that as an actual genocide. Whatever weight that holds, given recent events with the international court.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It boils down to destroying each others strategic assets. Logistics like trains, straining out the supply lines, and destroying fuels.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Russia has embraced full attrition warfare, they don't care if they lose 6 gorillion or more

    Ukraine does not have 6 gorillion soldiers

    Even if Russia loses all of their tanks and armored vehicles in storage they'd just do mass golf cart assaults or buy back old stock from third world countries

    There's no mass mobilization outside of the yearly quotas, that only means they're sending gullible turd worlders to die

    Ukraine should start building underground ammunition factories that link beneath NATO countries

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not caring about losses doesn't make them go away. There's a rare genetic disorder that makes people immune to pain and few people with it survive past childhood because they don't care about getting injured.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No, but it is a large advantage in terms of political willpower. When you don’t care how many peasant villagers and poor migrants die you can keep spending their lives without incurring a serious cost. Ukraine has managed the political cost to an extent by suspending elections and passing strong mobilization laws, strengthening boarder guard forces, greatly strengthened conscription forces, stopping passport issuance, etc and so on but there’s still a serious political cost which builds up over time — costs which aren’t nearly as high for Russia. A huge mistake for Ukraine was letting so many people flee the country — of course back then everyone thought the U.S. and NATO would come to their defense so I can’t really blame them ie hindsight is 20/20 but that move has made the political cost being incurred now worse. It’s a huge problem and it’s not at all controversial.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Neither side has actually taken that heavy losses when it comes to KIA. In my opinion, Russia has lost something like 90k men KIA while Ukraine has lost 40-50k. Casualties are MUCH higher something like 200-300k but im not confident enough to give concrete numbers there since a "causality" is kind of arbitrary

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Russia has embraced full attrition warfare, they don't care if they lose 6 gorillion or more
      Good. I hope they get brain drained to Sub-Saharan IQ levels.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      And what do they hope to achieve with a bunch of poorly trained light infantry once the soviet stockpiles are gone? At that point offensives are off the table, so they won't even be able to do anything other than sit in trenches and bombed.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Meat assaults

        Golf cart rush

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >I don't know what machine guns, anti-personnel mines, artillery, and even basic b***h barbed wire are for.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Don't matter

            Charge comrade

            For Z motherland

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >All of you will die
              How is this motivational

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Motivational?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The CO's a straight-shooter. I'd follow him into hell

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If (you) are standing next me and I hear that (you) will die, I'll be quite motivated.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Esl

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >How is this motivational
                It's a russian thing, you wouldn't get it

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >least motivating speech ever

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              We have our brain soaps, for sure

              But these dudes are another level
              Well, social security expenses will be very low in around 50 years

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          So they all die and achieve nothing.

          And when the side that now has the hardware goes on the attack?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It’d be interesting to see how trying to send every young man to the front would affect the stability of the Russian state

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Commies killed 40 million Russians and they did nothing. Russians are cattle and they'll do as they're told.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Directly led to Russia's current state, with it's apocalyptic population pyramid.
          You've got to pay the piper sometime, and rather than doing anything else, king monke has apparently decided to triple down on Russia's extinction.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nothing about this is representative of a modern "peer war". It's literally just two third world tier armies (one with a nonfunctional air force and the other a practically nonexistent one) slapfighting each other with whatever they have on hand.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Be careful or you will get AI NCO.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >/k/ has fallen so hard that a normie summertime view of warfare for an OP is considered a good question with the thread being filled with shills from both sides shitposting against each other

    This place fricking sucks man

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >ayyy le both sides
      >frog
      Frick off back to vkontakte, subhuman.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What is your view then, abnormie?

        >you must be pretending to be neutral cause you're a shill
        I'm an American who hopes both sides lose because frick all of you.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Who are you quoting? I asked for your non normie view on the war, and you gave none.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Schizo

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Russian homosexual.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What is your view then, abnormie?

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    F-16 is the new wonder waffle.

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Surely, there will be some kind of breakthrough in technology or tactics like tanks and infiltration tactics of WW1?

    Actual leading edge planes doing SEAD. Frick tons of persistent deep strike on logistics and force concentrations. Drones aren't shit when the operators have to displace way the frick back or be starved/splatted.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    At the current rate of attrition, manpower losses won't be a concern to Ukraine or Russia for a couple of decades.
    At the current rate of land loss, loss of land won't be a concern to Ukraine for a century or so.
    That leaves vehicles/weapons/material losses which is a REAL concern to both Ukraine and Russia, Ukraine obviously is beholden to Western supplies, and Russia is rapidly running out of advanced tech/weapons/vehicles.

    This war will be decided on who can get a large material advantage over the other guy. Will westies stop supplying Ukraine? Will Russia exhaust it's entire soviet stockpile?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      China is already supplying Russia with lethal weapons

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        We already knew China is giving food aid, anon.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Russian artillery starts firing Chinese MREs at the Ukies
          such devastation...

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      People always talk about how Russia is going to run out of tanks in 2 years but nobody talks about how Ukraine only has like 2000 tanks (that includes both active and storage.) So assuming a loss rate of 1:3 Russia just needs something like 3000 active + 3000 stockpile for Ukraine to run out before Russia does. If Russia only has 4000 or something Ukraine would only have 667 by the time they run out which is still terrible

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Bit Ukraine isn't trading tanks in 1:3 duels, Russia is losing huge amounts of armour to minefields, drones, artillery and good old abandonment. Aren't the confirmed Russian losses already around 4000?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          4000 is what is confirmed by photos and videos, so in reality it is much more. This is what happens when boomers do not receive notification that the Second World War was 79 years ago and tanks blitzkrieg are no longer valid strategy.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Surely, there will be some kind of breakthrough in technology or tactics like tanks and infiltration tactics of WW1?
    But there wasn't any breakthrough in technology or tactics in WW1. Neither tanks, nor rapid barrage + stormtroopers, nor chemical gas, etc. managed to break the trench stalemate. The war continued until Germany's military just go completely ground down to attrition - it would have happened without tanks or infiltration tactics.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >like tanks and infiltration tactics of WW1?
      Those didn't break the stalemate, though.
      Every time someone introduced some surprise new weapon or tactic in WW1, which happened about 20 times, it only gave a brief advantage before the other side duplicated it or found sufficient counters to stay in the fight.

      A widely predicted upcoming wunderwaffe is unjammable AI drones.
      Both sides are working on it at once, it's supposedly being used in limited numbers already. And by the time the tech gets good, everybody will have counters to it that work at least well enough.

      Literally how Germany won WW1

      Wrong you tourist fricks. Communications and logistical limitations are why what whatever gains new tactics and tech produced could not be exploited until the end of the war. Educate yourselves.
      https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYvL90uFbwhO_2-ULfOsTR8EIz7VxbA27&si=lUwK9wbb3Fd7kfxG

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The USA stops being cowardly crybabies and allows Ukraine to be invade Russia. Fricking Wagner marched to Moscow because Russians had nothing to stop them, Ukraine could have done the same, but no, pigs in the USA start squealing about WWIII and nuclear armageddon every time Ukrainian drones fly into Russia. It is disgusting to see what the USA has become - cowards.

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think the breakthroughs will only come when someone starts getting and holding air superiority. Nobody’s able to do it though because anti air is just too good these days unless you’re the USA I guess. I don’t think Desert Storm was a fluke but I think it might now become a modern Battle of Cannae that generals will lose armies trying to achieve . Biggest innovation seems to be cheap drone tactics, but that just seems to drive the trench warfare.

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >stalemate
    In your dreams maybe? Russia is still advancing. Prepare yourself for the loss of Kharkov.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >kharkov
      sweet when does the expansion come out for EFT?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Russia is still advancing
      Last time I checked they were still sitting in hamlets 5km from the border. Two more weeks till Kharkiv?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How the frick did we go from
      >Kiev in three days
      to
      >Kharkiv in three years

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I wonder if it's from a Russian shill on VPN, a troll, or a /misc/ American who genuinely thinks and speaks like this.

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Glide bomb spam. This is the best hope for both Ukraine and Russia of advancing. For this to happen Russia needs more glide kits and to maintain a safe launch envelope. For Ukraine it's a matter of achieving the safe launch envelope and getting enough launch platforms (glide/kits bombs won't be any problem NATO has a gazillion to spare).

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The answer is artillery. Compared to WW1 both sides in this war have PATHETIC amounts of artillery. To take ANY position you need enough artillery to suppress not only the position but also to completely cut it off from the rear AND suppress enemy artillery so they can't fire back. This requires about 100 tubes/km minimum and near unlimited ammo. It worked in ww1 but once they broke through they couldn't bring their arty forward fast enough to continue the offensive. Modern SPGs should solve this.

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    NATO/Ukraine will agree to ceasefire with current red territory going to russia after Trump wins.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ukraine, unlike Israel, activity acts against US interests and yet we still worship them. Maybe Trump will normalize this.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Howdy partner, John "Buck Rodeo" Smithyanov here! All the comrades in my oblast agree, it's high time we stop supporting those dirty dogs of Ukraine. I'll be sure to write my governor to end this madness.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Implying "elected" Amerikkkan politicians listen to their constituents
          Sad!

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Russia would need new mobilisation. Heavy losses if they just decides to advance on all fronts. They are obviously not ok with neither option one or two.

    Ukraine would need maybe another 300 billion (adjusted for MIC export pricing probably 900 billion) in lend lease and somehow to get back all those people from overseas, since their manpower reserves are already at scraping barrel levels.

    It will be a stalemate until one side runs out of equipment to hold the front.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *