what are the tactical implications of destroying a major rail hub 200 miles inside russia?

what are the tactical implications of destroying a major rail hub 200 miles inside russia?

  1. 4 days ago
    Anonymous

    strategic

    • 4 days ago
      Anonymous

      >strategic
      Pretty sure the strike has tactical implications even if it ALSO has strategic implications.

      In fact, it might not have much strategic implications at all. Rail damage can be quickly reversible and Russia's already generally aware of the range of Ukrainian weapons. This was likely done to achieve a specific disruption or destroy a specific concentration of supplies being housed there.

      The only thing worse than a pedant is a wrong pedant.

      • 4 days ago
        Anonymous

        Pretty sure you're an uptight gay. Go back to plebbit. You reek of it.

        • 4 days ago
          Anonymous

          >Pretty sure you're an uptight gay
          Not the one that tried to correct the OP in the fist place.

          >The only thing worse than a pedant is a wrong pedant.

          • 4 days ago
            Anonymous

            Anon. Reread what I said more slowly cause holy fuck.

            do not be discouraged by those who attempt to slide the thread or muddy the waters.

      • 4 days ago
        Anonymous

        anon, its a rail hub. even if the rails get repaired, the supplies near the hub are lost.

        • 4 days ago
          Anonymous

          Anon. Reread what I said more slowly cause holy fuck.

  2. 4 days ago
    Anonymous
  3. 4 days ago
    Anonymous

    Your investments in that Russian truck company get more valuable.

  4. 4 days ago
    Anonymous

    For anyone wondering, this is the yard south of Lipetsk.
    I have not seen any other confirmation but FIRMS is indeed lit up there

    • 4 days ago
      Anonymous

      is only ivan*~~) ivan loves to smoke, tovarisch work hard and take many smoke break for his big troubles, do not worry of ivan*~~

      • 4 days ago
        Anonymous

        you know I was just looking up some stuff and it might actually be an ivan, just not the smoker

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_the_Wagons
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_rail_war_in_Russia
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Russian_mystery_fires

        There may actually yet be russians who aren't too pussy-whipped to do something.

        • 4 days ago
          Anonymous

          Not the guy you're replying to but I wouldn't doubt such a thing for a minute. The real questions IMO are
          >if their hard work will pay off for them long term (i.e. eventually getting a non-shit non-chimp nation)
          >how many of them there actually are
          >how broad their support is
          >how they're operating and communicating
          >what resistance they're facing

          If the sheer number and nature of incidents there've been is any indication they must not be tracked all that hard bu the Russian authorities.

  5. 4 days ago
    Anonymous

    It's a big deal since that's to the north east of where the Ukies made all their gains recently, it will likely hamper any counter attacks/shelling planned to come from the Russian border.

  6. 4 days ago
    Anonymous

    within the maximum range of the TB2’s range, but i can’t believe even retarded russians would be unable to shoot down drones that deep into their territory

    • 4 days ago
      Anonymous

      Could be a Neptune strike. Now that Ukraine has plenty of coastal defense, they have the option to use Neptune in ground attack mode.

  7. 4 days ago
    Anonymous

    CIA is funding Partisans in Russia obviously

  8. 4 days ago
    Anonymous

    Many weapon systems are given to Ukraine from NATO under the condition that they are not to be used to attack targets on Russian soil. Ukraine also has some self interest in not launching attacks there. I have my doubts that it was a Ukranian weapon strike.

    • 4 days ago
      Anonymous

      >I have my doubts that it was a Ukranian weapon strike.
      Totally, otherwise le monke wouldn't shut up about le ebil Ukrainian nazis bombing Russian orphanages full of anti-fascist babies.

    • 4 days ago
      Anonymous

      >I have my doubts that it was a Ukranian weapon strike.
      Totally, otherwise le monke wouldn't shut up about le ebil Ukrainian nazis bombing Russian orphanages full of anti-fascist babies.

      >INB4 False Flag.

      • 4 days ago
        Anonymous

        You false flags orphanages, not useful stuff.

        • 4 days ago
          Anonymous

          not in Russia

        • 4 days ago
          Anonymous

          you think monke is thinking logically anymore?

Your email address will not be published.