1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Who

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Lurk more, newfag.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >can't answer the question
        I guess you don't know either.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This guy

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Ooooh. That dude. I thought he was dressed as the Joker when he did it not wearing some tacticool larp.
        Look at those eyes. That man was sitting at home one day when some glowie called and said his activation code.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          His father worked for the CIA and he was gnomish.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >MY FAAAAAAATHER

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            a tale as old as time

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The whole joker thing was entirely made up by media outlets.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >The whole joker thing was entirely made up by media outlets.
            The district attorney at least said it was two federal agents who initially made that claim, then the media ran with it. Media should be less credulous in general about what law enforcement says whether federal, state or local granted.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the pornstar

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not as good as Troy Hurtubise

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >PrepHole

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Can I get a data sheet for the Kill radius of the cum jar bullet bomb for soft and armored targets please?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the CPU cooler is a critical element to this contraption

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >ATF found the piss bomb

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      lmao, what a load of crap. So this was another false flag, what fun

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >those fucking cannonballs
      based and piratepilled

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this image doesn't look real
      it looks like a shoop made by that schizo who died a couple years ago

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >looks like a shoop
        Can you tell by the pixels?

    • 4 weeks ago
      BigC

      >a fucking cpu heat sink and a bunch of phone cable and jars full of gasoline
      yeah the shooting and this "bomb" were 100% government ops

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >bombs
      the only bomb there is the chair piston.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Bass Pro Shop mentioned!

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >IMG_3956.jpg (saved to iPhone photo library)
    >PrepHole
    >literally who
    >"Tactical vest"

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Reading about this guy he was super intelligent before he got on meds

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I recognize that fucking image, it's one of the Future Force Warrior concepts from the early 2000s. They just shopped out the funny OICW pistol he was carrying and called it a day.

    How lazy are these people?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Pic related

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Someone watched too much robot cop as a kid.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I always thought that pic looked a bit disconnected from his actual stuff; no wonder.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I only recognized it because I used to waste my time on a stupid nation roleplaying forum where every other newfag would say their countries soldiers looked like that guy.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >scuba mask

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Kino

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I always felt that this image was more faithful to Holmes' gear than that pic.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Who made the background of this image transparent so you can't view it inline?

        Lightmoders are subhuman

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >purchased online
        And?
        These people have a grade school teacher mentality.
        Little Bobby does something bad so we punish the entire class.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          "Punishing everyone for the misdeeds of a few" is pretty much the basis for gun control.

          Hence why many like myself are against it.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            All gun control is unconstitutional. I personally believe the gun control argument is dead, it died during the Summer of Love when private firearm ownership skyrocketed (first time gun buyers)

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Congratulations you've figured out gun laws. Nearly every gun law on the books exists so that when some gang member or mobster gets arrested the DA has more charges to throw at him and as a consequence law abiding citizens get dicked over

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This seems like a pretty decent rundown actually.

        >purchased online
        And?
        These people have a grade school teacher mentality.
        Little Bobby does something bad so we punish the entire class.

        I think you're being overly sensitive, it was just being matter of fact and reporting that this stuff wasn't due to an LGS but purchased online. There isn't anything more to it than that.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >There isn't anything more to it than that.
          lmao

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            ?
            If anything I could almost read that as pro-gun or at least anti-mob, like "don't blame any local stores for this" (not that that would make any sense anyway, but if anyone was searching for a local scapegoat that local politics or threats could affect they wouldn't get it out of that image).

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I guess I should just ignore the last decade of them demanding to end online purchase of ammo and stuff yeah anon? Brain dead retard.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I guess I should just ignore the last decade of them demanding to end online purchase of ammo and stuff yeah anon?
                Honestly have never heard of that around here. Don't see anyway it could be legally done either given the commerce clause. Lots of people demand stupid shit and I don't pay any attention to it unless it has some possibility of passing court review. If the possibility is zero it's a waste of life to worry about.

                We are talking about people who earnestly believe that guns are evil, men can get pregnant, morons are human, vax is safe and everyone can buy a machine gun in 10 minutes.
                Any soundbite, written text or movie scene which shows a bad thing connected with another thing is placed there to trigger the emotional response of those people and instill fear/disgust into them.
                Guns, armor, bullets, tactical equipment? Bad.
                Internet with no control and free acess to ammo? Also bad.

                OP's image is definitely OMG FEAR and retarded. Maybe I'm just too jaded and into guns because I read it and it was just like "oh, informative on his loadout choices" lol. I guess you guys are a good check on me having autism, like if someone on PrepHole posted that as something they did in a loadout thread I'd simply be impressed by the effort they made. I don't have any social media accounts or watch any TV though, guess I'm in my own bubble.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          We are talking about people who earnestly believe that guns are evil, men can get pregnant, morons are human, vax is safe and everyone can buy a machine gun in 10 minutes.
          Any soundbite, written text or movie scene which shows a bad thing connected with another thing is placed there to trigger the emotional response of those people and instill fear/disgust into them.
          Guns, armor, bullets, tactical equipment? Bad.
          Internet with no control and free acess to ammo? Also bad.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >everyone can buy a machine gun in 10 minutes
            It should be like this

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              no it shouldn't

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yes it should bootlicker

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                mgs are only useful to criminals and militaries sorry schizo

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous
              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                blessed be the boot protecting us from machine gun maniacs!

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                no it shouldn't

                Here's the lawful purpose that should be required to own a machine gun: "I want one".

                Why a private citizen wants something is no business of anyone else, least of all the government.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Here's the lawful purpose that should be required to own a machine gun: "I want one".
                I'm sure you do for no ulterior reason whatsoever.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                my ulterior motive is that there are few things more satisfying than magdumping on full auto. It's not really practical, particularly in mass shooting applications, but it's fun to have.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >mgs are only useful to criminals and militaries sorry schizo
                you know that you can buy a tank online right? it cost 250k$ USD. you could only operate it on your own private property though as it was not street legal

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >WWI
                Fuck whoever made that infographic.

                But yes, I would like to own a fully-functional M4A3E8.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                mgs are only useful to criminals and militaries sorry schizo

                blessed be the boot protecting us from machine gun maniacs!

                https://i.imgur.com/zppex4a.png

                >Here's the lawful purpose that should be required to own a machine gun: "I want one".
                I'm sure you do for no ulterior reason whatsoever.

                The 2A is clear, the Founders were clear.
                Constitutional Carry is now shall-issue nationwide. SCOUTUS will continue to repeal all unconstitutional 2A violations, including the NFA and the ATF in due time. You will continue to mald and seethe at America being free again. We will never bow to weak, cowardly people who think that defending your life against violent morons is bad.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                founders had no machine guns so no not clear sorry criminal wannabe

                we live in a society 🙂

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You tried too hard, 1/8 b8 m8

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                nah im actually serious about this one

                https://i.imgur.com/D6p9pcr.jpg

                >mgs are only useful to criminals and militaries sorry schizo
                you know that you can buy a tank online right? it cost 250k$ USD. you could only operate it on your own private property though as it was not street legal

                and the ammo for it?

                though even if you can buy the ammo honestly it's less worrying in most respects

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, I don't think you are mate. Otherwise, you're just not paying attention. People could own full-autos as recently as the 1980s, so clearly it was never a problem before. You pay a couple hundred for the tax stamp and that's that, a new automatic AR in your hands.
                As for the founders, firstly the musket was the primary military arm of the age, the citizen owned exactly what the military could. Not just rifles, but also cannons of all sorts. The founders were undoubtedly aware of the Puckle gun, a multi-shot type of swivel gun (with an alternate square bullet mode for shooting Turks), and this was never said to be unlawful to the citizen. They were also aware of that one air rifle which could shoot multiple times, and there were forms of early multi-shot firearms developed in their lifetimes. Not once did they ever speak up and say "this is too much, you people can't have that", but instead when written to by citizens to clarify, they always answered that they could, that there wasn't a reason they shouldn't own superior firepower.
                So I'm sorry (not really), but Americans are free. We can do as we wish, because at the end of the day the only people hurt by me owning an automatic weapon is the range officer screaming at me to stop mag dumping downrange and my own wallet from all the ammo I'm burning through. That and criminals who decide to fuck around and find out. I have no reason not to own it, because I'm a law-abiding citizen of this great nation.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >b-but the founders wanted you to be able to own nooks!

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Unironically yes. If you actually consider all the money that would go into simply maintaining one and setting up the related infrastructure like silos and control stations, not even getting into the cost of a nuke itself, clearly you can see that not even the upper middle class would be able to own one functional nuke because it's out of their price range. The mass shooter types the CIA grooms clearly couldn't afford one, not without raising a lot of eyebrows. So it basically means that only people with far too much of a stake in the world, such as having large corporations, would even be able to own them, and wouldn't use them outside of perhaps recreational means on their own land lest they destroy their own company and the whole world they require for it to run. So not much changes, therefore I don't see why not.
                Any more non-arguments? I could go into how the Founders didn't have any free black people in their day, or that they didn't let women do anything but fart out babies all day, so perhaps we should discuss the removal of the amendments granting them suffrage, citizenship, and freedom since the Founders didn't have those in their day.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Unironically yes.
                oh ok so you're an insane selfish schizo lolbertarian.
                >it'll be great guys if amazon and bezos and everyone have nukes and fallout stays on "their own private land" and this is a good thing
                holy shit have a nice day

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >insane selfish schizo lolbertarian
                What a silly emotional outburst.
                Too much bathtub estrogen?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >literally treats only corporate overlords as having weapons as a good thing
                go back to reason.com

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >No, I don't think you are mate.
                yeah 100% am. mgs are boring and useless for civilians. fun to try once or twice at the range then your just pissing away money for nothing. there is no skill or getting better, no pushing yourself, just pull trigger and hold trigger and keep it in roughly the right direction. would rather have a shot gun or normal battle rifle for home defense. trash for hunting.

                mgs are useful exclusively for killing large numbers of people. that's the point. sbrs and cans should not be on nfa at all. normal guns should require zero permits of any kind, open or concealed or anything (like my state). no mag restrictions.

                but mgs and dds and heavier? yeah fine with that not being available.
                >Otherwise, you're just not paying attention. People could own full-autos as recently as the 1980s
                ain't 1980s anymore. how about you completely solve mass shootings and gangs first. then you can come back about military gear.

                >Americans are free
                america is not about anarchy. never was. you don't get to just disregard everyone else unless you want the same back. world doesn't revolve around you fag. feel free to move to somalia or some shithole if that's what you want.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >how about you completely solve mass shootings and gangs first
                Ok, give me a couple of crates of full auto rifles and immunity from prosecution and I'll take care of the problem that the government refuses to do anything about.
                Otherwise your ridiculous requirements are a red herring.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >muh fun
                >muh skill
                >muh hunting
                Cool, it's a good thing that the Second Amendment never said anything about these though, fudd. It exclusively says that the people can own any weapons they want and you can't do anything about that, and that they are for national defense and the protection of liberty. The fact that you think this wrong somehow is concerning.
                >mgs are useful exclusively for killing large numbers of people
                And? Perhaps there's a large number of people invading America, perhaps a large number of people have broken onto your property looking to hurt you and your family. Whatever the reason, they are valid to a free citizen.
                >how about you completely solve mass shootings and gangs first
                Disbanding the CIA, ATF, and other three letter agencies would be a start. Giving the people their own firepower to deal with the gangs is the next step. And the gangs and criminals already have automatic weapons, you do realize it's as simple and easy as drilling one hole in the lower, or bending a piece of coathanger, right? But those are crimes, so people like me don't do that. Only criminals do, and then they come for us. I am allowed an equivalent for my own protection.
                >america is not about anarchy
                You don't know what that word means, and it's not what I'm arguing for.
                >you don't get to just disregard everyone else
                Yes, I can. I can do that right now and disregard you too. As long as what I do doesn't harm anyone who is a law-abiding citizen or infringe on someone else's rights, then I can do it and you can't stop me by law. THAT is what America is about. Not anarchy, but freedom. If you desire to be protected by the government and your guns are illegal for any form of defense, just for hunting and range trips, then you can go to Europe. Franklin practically advocated that you people go there if you choose safety over freedom, saying you deserve neither.

                >Unironically yes.
                oh ok so you're an insane selfish schizo lolbertarian.
                >it'll be great guys if amazon and bezos and everyone have nukes and fallout stays on "their own private land" and this is a good thing
                holy shit have a nice day

                >non-argument
                I accept your concession

                >literally treats only corporate overlords as having weapons as a good thing
                go back to reason.com

                >muh overlords
                Ok commie

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                1a says nothing about defamation or childporn either, bet you'd love both being legal huh?

                but sorry bitch democracy wins. 2a means what scotus says it means because that's constitutional too. if congress doesn't like what scotus does enough it can just impeach all the justices who it doesn't like or stuff the court. also constitutional. so if you want to generate enough political will to see 2a pared back or eliminated entirely by all means ignore reality.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I hope you hang, tyrant.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >1a says nothing about defamation or childporn either
                Both are abuses of other people's rights, so it's basically inferred that they're not allowed. Read the Bill of Rights again.
                >sorry bitch democracy wins
                Democracy doesn't let you overwrite all the rules of our country, fag. The Bill of Rights is not negotiable, the foundation of our country is not something that can be overwritten or rolled back. Those are permanent.
                >2a means what scotus says it means because that's constitutional too
                Alright, cool to see that you support the incoming overruling of the NFA and the reinstatement of our pre-1986 rights. That's more than likely why they ruled that removing a gun's serial number is legal now, because pre-NFA autos are solely identified by their serials. Without a serial, you could easily claim that any automatic firearm you have is pre-ban, because our legal system works on the basis of innocent until proven guilty. So it's up to the prosecutor to prove that said firearm is illegal, and they can't without a serial. NFA override is coming soon.
                >if congress doesn't like what scotus does enough it can just impeach all the justices who it doesn't like or stuff the court
                Read a book, they can't do that. They don't appoint judges and impeachment has to have a legitimate reason. Not to mention that they can be found not guilty at the impeachment and reinstated. You clearly do not know the law enough to speak on this matter.
                Go back.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >you don't get to just disregard everyone else
                I absolutely do, go the fuck back to leftyguns. You're fooling no one. I dont have to care about you. It's called being free.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >dunna haveta care i do wut i want u aren't even my real momma or my mom's buck
                good comment

                I hope you hang, tyrant.

                seethe lolbertarian

                >1a says nothing about defamation or childporn either
                Both are abuses of other people's rights, so it's basically inferred that they're not allowed. Read the Bill of Rights again.
                >sorry bitch democracy wins
                Democracy doesn't let you overwrite all the rules of our country, fag. The Bill of Rights is not negotiable, the foundation of our country is not something that can be overwritten or rolled back. Those are permanent.
                >2a means what scotus says it means because that's constitutional too
                Alright, cool to see that you support the incoming overruling of the NFA and the reinstatement of our pre-1986 rights. That's more than likely why they ruled that removing a gun's serial number is legal now, because pre-NFA autos are solely identified by their serials. Without a serial, you could easily claim that any automatic firearm you have is pre-ban, because our legal system works on the basis of innocent until proven guilty. So it's up to the prosecutor to prove that said firearm is illegal, and they can't without a serial. NFA override is coming soon.
                >if congress doesn't like what scotus does enough it can just impeach all the justices who it doesn't like or stuff the court
                Read a book, they can't do that. They don't appoint judges and impeachment has to have a legitimate reason. Not to mention that they can be found not guilty at the impeachment and reinstated. You clearly do not know the law enough to speak on this matter.
                Go back.

                bill of rights can absolutely be negotiated and modified and has repeatedly lol
                >Alright, cool to see that you support the incoming overruling of the NFA
                nah and anything that can go one way can go the other so you are acknowledging that 🙂
                >Read a book, they can't do that. They don't appoint judges and impeachment has to have a legitimate reason.
                nah you are the one who needs to read. "legit reason" is whatever congress wants. there is no one to appeal to anon. they are the most powerful branch of government by design. the core check
                on congress is cant normally get 500+ dudes from across country to agree on shit. but if enough do? congress can do fucking anything. which again ain't happening... unless like 80% of the country hates it. which for some of your fag lolbertarian shit is more like 99%. deal with it manchild.

                you live in a society.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >bill of rights can absolutely be negotiated
                No, you cannot repeal any part of the Bill of Rights. As the Founders themselves said, these rights are not granted, they are natural to man. The Bill of Rights merely enshrines them, it exists solely to inform you and everyone else that people have this rights.
                This is part of the law as written to. You cannot overrule these laws in America.
                >they are the most powerful branch of government by design
                No, you also seem to have not learned what checks and balances are supposed to do. It's supposed to make each branch of government more or less as equal as possible in power, only with a different scope of abilities.
                You sound incredibly ignorant, arrogant, possibly retarded, and there's about a 50% chance you don't even live here, in which case your word means less than shit about my country (not that your opinion, as given by a US citizen, would be much different).
                >lolbertarian
                >manchild
                As said by the historically and legally illiterate communist?
                >you live in a society
                You live in your mom's basement. Get a job and stop being a gay. Read a book too, the school system failed you.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >No, you cannot repeal any part of the Bill of Rights
                we've literally done it see prohibition. lol what a kid you tell others to read books when you've never read a single one!

                never read the constitution either except the 2a.
                >It's supposed to make each branch of government more or less as equal as possible in power, only with a different scope of abilities.
                nope. founders flat out stated congress was the most powerful and made it so. this isn't schoolhouse rocks or whatever shallow child cartoon you "learned" from. congress is closest to the people, potus further (originally) and scotus farthest. why only congress has power of the purse, ability to declare war, and impeachment.

                go on, if congress impeaches the president or a justice tell us who the constitution says can overrule that? spoiler: no one.

                the check on congress is democracy itself. that's "it".

                you live in a society. now be a good boy and go get your next criminal background check for a firearm purchase as we dictate for you. your ignorant selfish schizo kind are part of why we have them after all.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >prohibition
                Your legal retardation is worse than I thought. You should learn what the Bill of Rights is before trying to act smug, dumbass.
                >founders flat out stated congress was the most powerful
                And do you have a source for this beyond your moldy crack pipe?
                >impeaches
                And can you define what that means? I'm betting you can't
                >ignorant retard babble
                Not reading, get fucked gay. Post guns or get the fuck out.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >You should learn what the Bill of Rights is before trying to act smug, dumbass.
                constitutional amendments are constitutional amendments. the "bill of rights" was merely the first ten. there is nothing special about them. they didn't apply to states at all until incorporation based on the 14th amendment. before that a state law could restrict 2a or whatever at will (within state constitution). holy fuck are you proudly stupid. if congress passed a new amendment completely eliminating 2a and states ratified they can just do it and that would be that. what stops it is lack of enough political will. that's how democracy is and supposed to be.

                as for if you actually care what the founders said read federalist. but if you want to know what the constitution says you can just, you know, read it the constitution. for once. because you never had.
                >And can you define what that means?
                it means majority of the house and super majority of the senate votes to impeach and the whoever it is is removed from office and (at the option of congress) barred from ever holding any public office ever again. the house has the SOLE power of impeachment so only they decide what it means. only senate can convict. other branches have zero involvement. doesn't need to be a crime, it's just whatever they want.
                >I'm betting you can't
                because you've never read the constitution. impeachment is article 1 section 2 clause 5. conviction is article 1, section 3 clause 6 (2/3 senate).

                always funny how you schizo kids always claim to be constitutionalists but have never read any of it yourselves. and hate anything that doesn't agree with your head canon.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                > the "bill of rights" was merely the first ten. there is nothing special about them.
                Nope, it will never be true no matter how many times you leftards repeat this lie, seethe about it.
                >it means majority of the house and super majority of the senate votes to impeach and the whoever it is is removed from office
                No again, you've proven that you are a certified retard once more, because that's not what it means.
                >the whoever it is is removed from office and (at the option of congress) barred from ever holding any public office ever again
                Interesting how Trump was impeached twice and yet still served out his whole term. Funny how that works, doesn't it?
                >muh schizoooooos
                >muh headcanoooooooooooon
                And you still didn't post guns, because you can't own them you mental patient. Time to go back where you came from gay.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >constitutional amendments can't happen because.... my head canon!!!
                whew
                >Interesting how Trump was impeached twice and yet still served out his whole term. Funny how that works, doesn't it?
                no? he wasn't convicted by 2/3 of the senate, so he wasn't "impeached" in the general usage which means "impeached and convicted". not because a court said congress couldn't but because congress decided it didn't want to. if congress had decided it did want to he'd have been out of there. same as any supreme court justice, if congress wants to impeach and get rid them for ruling wrong it can do it and there is no appeal. size of court also is law not constitution, congress wants to add on another 2 or 5 or 9 justices it can. norms and politics is what stops that.

                we don't live in a dictatorship child. maybe russia is more your style?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >constitutional amendments can't happen
                Not what I said, tard. I said you can't repeal the Bill of Rights, those are our freedoms as citizens.
                >he wasn't convicted by 2/3 of the senate, so he wasn't "impeached" in the general usage
                It's funny how you argue that I don't know my constitution because I don't use the precise legalese, but when you do it it's ok. Perhaps that's because you have to cover for being a midwit at best
                >we don't live in a dictatorship
                Correct, so you're not taking my freedoms away no matter what. Simple as that, thank you, goodbye noguns gay, back to bunkerchan where you belong, and all the other pleasantries of hatred for your wannabe tyrant ass.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I said you can't repeal the Bill of Rights, those are our freedoms as citizens.
                no they are merely amendments 1 through 10 (and scotus decided to just ignore #10). there is nothing constitutionally special about them whatsoever. they can be eliminated or altered by new constitutional amendments same as anything else. everything in the constitution can, that's the point of the constitutional amendment process. actually genuinely kind of curious where you picked up this new kind of crazy since there isn't a single iota of history or argument ever arguing anything different.

                i notice how you just dodged right away from
                >if congress impeaches the president or a justice tell us who the constitution says can overrule that? spoiler: no one.
                funny that huh? i'll take that as your humble concession that yes if congress doesn't like a president or justice congress can remove them.
                >so you're not taking my freedoms away no matter what
                your freedoms are what we say they are. it's not anarchy. you will obey or you can join your criminal brethren in "freedom" before the forces of justice and liberty stick your ass to be free in prison or a grave. sorry lolbertarian dictator wannabe, no cp and no nukes for you 🙂

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >no
                Yes, they are. Stop lying.
                >i notice how you just dodged right away from
                Because it's irrelevant here, the branches are equal in power. You're arguing in circles, so it's entirely justified that I ignore you when I've already answered and settled the question. Asking it twice is not an argument.
                >i'll take that as your humble concession
                Take this dick up your ass, numbnuts
                >your freedoms are what we say they are
                Nope
                >it's not anarchy
                Yes, but you seem to not understand what that word means, so you're just being retarded again.
                >you will obey
                >the forces of justice and liberty
                >lolbertarian dictator
                Lmao, what the fuck is this retardation? You're legitimately a drooling fucking retard. I'm glad you're a mental incompetent who can't decide what I do as an American citizen. Go strawman somewhere else, you argue like a vatnik. Probably because you are one too, a dumbass like you would think a dictatorship is free and that freedom is slavery, since that's what you've essentially said here as you contradicted yourself multiple times. Thanks for the free win, you may concede now.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Yes, they are. Stop lying.
                no they aren't. read the us constitution.
                >the branches are equal in power.
                no they aren't. read the us constitution.
                >Nope
                yep. same as you can't do what we say you can't right now. or rather you can, but then you're a criminal. that is how it works in reality child.
                >waaahhhhhh
                like i said you will obey what the long term super majority (us) decide for you or you will face the power of us (the state). if you win because you're superman or something then your opinions will now be law. otherwise you can join all the sovereign citizens and similar whackjobs seething in jail (or dead). that is what law is.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >no they aren't
                Yes
                >read the us constitution.
                Have
                >WAAAAH HUMOR MY MENTALLY DRANGED REVENGE FANTASIES WAAAAAAAAAAAH
                I'm beginning to see that the main reason you support this tyranny and gun control is because you would 100% shoot up a public place. Have some sex incel, maybe you'll stop being such an angry, illiterate tard if you do. Or have a nice day, I don't care either way as long as you learn to stop acting like a moron who's afraid of responsibility. At the least, my department won't stand around like the fags at Uvalde, we'd stop you before you hurt any kids since you appear to be entirely incompetent.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Yes
                nope. because it doesn't say that anywhere. congress can remove the other two branches at will. congress controls all the money. congress makes law. congress can override the president's veto. they dont have any counter to that. this is by design. stupid child.
                >Have
                no, you never have. the only who has cited actual constitutional clauses here is me, because you have never read it.
                >noooo law doesnt apply to me
                >my department
                lol you are a fucking cop no wonder you are an authoritarian wannabe, have imaginary head canon about the constitution and don't respect citizen's rights or legislative oversight! what a joke, all makes sense now though.

                tell us about where in the constitution it says "qualified immunity" next 🙂

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >denial again
                Your mental deficiency and impotent seething isn't my problem, loser.
                >another strawman
                No, I suppose I'm not an authoritarian since you spent all your time up to now arguing that I should be arresting people for exercising their rights. If I am authoritarian, then you just BTFOed yourself and admitted that you're a stupid incel loser.
                >don't respect citizen's rights
                Define those for me? Because you just said that your rights as a citzen are negotiable and can be overruled by the state. In other words, by me. So unless you want to admit that you've been wrong this entire time and that you're a certified retard, then I'm "the powers of justice and liberty" as you said.
                Go ahead, I can't wait to hear your coming copium response. Perhaps your little Russian troll brain will simply fry itself. One less freedom-hating vatnik is always a good thing 🙂

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Your mental deficiency and impotent seething isn't my problem, loser.
                the only who has cited actual constitutional clauses here is me, because you have never read it.
                >Define those for me?
                read the constitution and also law and also caselaw. the combination of those defines citizen's rights. you wouldn't know though because they don't pick you for your iq.

                that you're now mixing in projection is pretty amusing too but still not as much as this idea you somehow acquired that the constitution has magical special parts that can't be amended. that one is just fascinating, never heard it before even from the sovcit whackos. some fresh crazy meme going around your circles?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >that one is just fascinating, never heard it before even from the sovcit whackos. some fresh crazy meme going around your circles?
                samefag here seriously please post some links for where this got into your head. just told some defense lawyer friends and they are curious as well.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >muh clauses
                >still coping that I know the constitution better than him
                Sad
                >can't define his own rights
                Your freedoms are what we say they are. It's not anarchy. You will obey or you can join your criminal brethren in "freedom" before the forces of justice and liberty stick your ass to be free in prison or a grave. Sorry incel dictator wannabe, no cp and no gun control for you 🙂

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                [...]
                >samefagging as he loses
                How pathetic lmao. Who are these lawyer friends of yours? The ones in your head telling you to shoot up a school incel?

                exhibit a for why we need and have gun control. thank god for the us constitution.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Okay then little buddy, wanna hand me your guns? After all, you want me to take them, as I'm the only person qualified to have them. I'll just need to make sure you're not hiding a thing from us, so let's see that hard drive too 🙂

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Okay then little buddy, wanna hand me your guns? After all, you want me to take them, as I'm the only person qualified to have them. I'll just need to make sure you're not hiding a thing from us, so let's see that hard drive too 🙂
                nah since i know the constitution and am not a schizo whackjob who refuses to ever back up what he says and think someone literally making clear they're doing a followup post is some big reveal "samefagging" lol. gun control and mental health checks exist to make it harder for america hating traitors like you to get heavier weapons. government exists to provide an overall backstop to our rights vs you. the 2a exists so that we can defend ourselves from you with regular small arms against the rest. simple as

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >i know the constitution and am not a schizo whackjob who refuses to ever back up what he says
                Yet you have not
                >gun control and mental health checks exist to make it harder for america hating traitors like you to get heavier weapons
                That sounds like treason to me buddy. You just argued that me and mine are protectors of liberty and America. You've pretty much conceded your entire little incel rant. I'm glad you guys won't be reproducing, it makes my job a lot easier with less of you shooting up schools.
                >the 2a exists so that we can defend ourselves from you
                As you said, your freedoms are what we say they are. It's not anarchy. You will obey or you can join your criminal brethren in "freedom" before the forces of justice and liberty stick your ass to be free in prison or a grave. Simple as. Unless you want to admit that you were never concerned with America or freedom, and that you just wanted to advocate that I should take guns away from people that you don't like.
                Thankfully, mental health checks exist to keep you from getting guns in the first place, so I can just taze you and stick you in a cell with Jamal for an hour once you chimp out and start beating on some poor woman because she refused to have sex with you 🙂

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >i will just mindlessly repeat the same thing back after getting btfo
                reduced to vatnik posting now lol damn are you mad

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm repeating your own words, kiddo. You're not too bright huh? Figures, you don't know anything about what you're talking about.
                Take that L son, cause you just BTFOed yourself. That's some dedication 🙂

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I'm repeating your own words
                but without any thinking or understanding, like a robot, and therefore it doesn't make sense. i cited the bits of the constitution related to impeachment and what the constitution says about the branches and you just slunk away from that. you still desperately refuse to cite anything on how you go the idea that amendments 1-10 are in any way special (particularly when they had no state level application at all initially and still only do now if scotus says so). you want the rich and corps to have nuclear weapons, claiming they wouldn't use them outside of "recreational means on their own land". you're clearly pretty insecure about intelligence though. please don't beat anyone because you got btfo on PrepHole ok?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >but without any thinking or understanding
                That sounds familiar, who could that be? Oh, I know, I'm talking to him! Good thing you can recognize your own faults buddy
                >n-no I w-win
                Lol, sure incel, you saved the white race by shitposting in mommy's basement. How heroic of you, idolizing dead war criminals and enemies of America while flip-flopping about what you really believe (because you argue like a holocaust denier lol).
                Well I support America and people following their rights in accordance to the law. Thankfully, people like you can't change that 🙂

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >still not a single cite for crazy claims, just spastic cope
                ok good sir. you indeed win!

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's good that you recognize how crazy you were sounding, talking about killing and hurting people with relish. That's not very healthy you know. But at least you agree that you really shouldn't have access to weapons, you'll hurt someone 🙂

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >that one is just fascinating, never heard it before even from the sovcit whackos. some fresh crazy meme going around your circles?
                samefag here seriously please post some links for where this got into your head. just told some defense lawyer friends and they are curious as well.

                >samefagging as he loses
                How pathetic lmao. Who are these lawyer friends of yours? The ones in your head telling you to shoot up a school incel?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                if i remember correctly most of them have to have their weapons deactivated but i know a few don't and you can pay to shoot them and all that, you probably need to keep it on private property and/or get a license or special dispensation.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Go back to plebbit stupid gay. Kys

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                moron gay

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >ballistic boots
        Are they referring to the counter mine boots from Altama with the ceramic honeycomb in the bottoms?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Most of [body armour] sold online is meant to be used only by police officers and the military
        I never understood this shit, it goes as far as making any sort of armour, be it stabproof, bulletproof, whatever illegal and on the same level as a firearm or other weaponry in some places

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          they idea is that the police should be able to easily hurt the citizens, so that the common man lives in fear of the state

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >tear gas grenade
        >purchased online for $16
        Have I been missing out? I swear I'll buy some right fucking now if that's an option, that's bad ass

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >The rifle jammed during the shooting, apparently because of the magazine.
        The drum mag meme strikes again.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >who even has ballistic boots?

        >tear gas grenade
        >purchased online for $16
        Have I been missing out? I swear I'll buy some right fucking now if that's an option, that's bad ass

        Don't get up to any trouble now.
        https://www.keepshooting.com/clear-out-6oz-tear-gas-grenade.html

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >metal shin guards
    Where to cop?

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Look at what they need to mimic a fraction of our power.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I thought you were posting about the guy from the Uwe Boll movie.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    thank fuck this guy was retarded otherwise he would have beat Breivik

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Don't know don't care. Real people are fighting in wars right now. I am wondering how I can use ball milling to remove sprue marks from my cast 360, 454 and .600 lead balls. I could not give a shit about whoever this retard is. I'm only here to tell you it is genuinely sad you do.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There's no way that antifa chud wore this spartan armor shit lol

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dude was basically asking for jams.
    >and he got them lmao

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    P O O R
    O
    O
    R

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He wasn't though. He was a PhD with a solid stipend and potential. He had lots more assets he could have liquidated. He seems to have been a legit loon, he had a long history of known psychological problems, he had seen a therapist who was worried because he expressed interest in mass killing, refused to talk about his plans, ended up emailing threats etc. He even called a mental health crisis hotline before the shooting (they disconnected him, too busy). He then just stood there outside and watched, police arrested him without the slightest resistance, and he politely informed them about booby trapping his apartment. Like, a million flashing warning lights were there for this dude for fucking years beforehand.

      It's true that at one point in America we were too quick about throwing people in asylums which were often horrible quack doctor places impossible to get out of, like if a sane person went in without anyone telling the facility they'd "discover" insanity in them anyway and their legal rights would be gone etc. So that was bad. But pendulum has gone way too far in the other direction where now the only response to genuine insane people is "wait until they commit a crime and then put them in prison for life" (plus an additional 3000 years for this guy).

      So yeah in principle he could have gotten more stuff but again, crazy person. Unfortunate even professionals who thought he was a potentially violent crazy person and had evidence from therapy he was a potentially violent crazy person who literally sent threat mails to his therapist still couldn't do shit.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *