Hope it happens the way the Chinese and 3rd workers treat factory workers is depressing only down side is your iPads and phones will be expensive then again we can buy a Samsung or south korean shit
theyre allies against the common enemy of "terror" and hamas has american civvies as hostages
Otherwise the US wouldnt do so much as hust sending and selling weapons.
but i guess its also a good example of what alliances are supposed to look like for third worlders.
If you think the US is deploying carrier groups for a few American tourists that got kidnapped you are smoking crack. There's a very real chance of this escalating into a bigger conflict and the Pentagon is going into overdrive in an attempt to clamp down on the situation before it gets out of hand.
https://i.imgur.com/PxlKaZj.png
We're going to get unironic nerve gas death videos very soon.
they absolutely would send a CSG because they dont have to negotiate with hamas the same way you have to negotiate with a major country like russia.
And yeah, its not just about american civvies, its about iran, saudi arabia, and israel, the three power players in the region responsible for the entire world's energy. but the "handholding" that the navy is doing is absolutely only as far as saving hostages, if not a good opportunity to get some experience with the crew.
So yeah. its both the hostages and the context of the situation. but its definitely not because of some schizo israeli conspiracy.
and to all that say that americans dont care about amerucan hostages we traded the nick cage lord of war arms dealer people made a literal movie about, for a WNBA player nobody knew until the switch happened
Know what?
No, Israel is not an American state. But America and Israel might both be privately owned states, like like all countries of the British Empire or the Commonwealth are privately owned by 1 royal family.
Israel is the only country in the Middle East that isn't occupied by America and that has no American military bases.
The US stores a massive arsenal in Israel for use in that part of the world at six separate sites, according to wikipedia. They let the Israelis borrow some munitions that were about to expire, once, but it required a vote from Congress to do so.
1 month ago
Anonymous
A lot of that supply has been depleted due to Ukraine however
1 month ago
Anonymous
And?
1 month ago
Anonymous
>And?
That kneecaps potential supply to both Israel and Ukraine going forward given this war is increasingly looking like a complicated regional one(if it actually happens)
1 month ago
Anonymous
That implies the us can’t produce more, you aren’t stupid enough to suggest that right?
1 month ago
Anonymous
I'm not saying the U.S can't produce more, I'm saying it's going to be very hard for the U.S to keep up with demand for two massive wars when it's already having issues political and economic keeping up with one, not to mention supply for the U.S military itself.
1 month ago
Anonymous
I am demoralized
1 month ago
Anonymous
Were you trying to greentext me, or are you serious?
1 month ago
Anonymous
I AM DEMORALIZED better hang myself the west has fallen
1 month ago
Anonymous
It's a fact that the U.S has done a shit job at mobilizing and reorienting it's MIC since Ukraine broke out. I'm not saying it can't bounce back, just that it's going to have a very hard time in the immediate future if things get really hot in the Middle East.
An then there's the political/economic side of stuff.
1 month ago
Anonymous
I AM DEMORALIZED THE WEST HAS FALLEN MASS SUICIDES ABOUND
1 month ago
Anonymous
You guys are worse than /misc/ sometimes
1 month ago
Anonymous
D
E
M
O
R
A
L
I
Z
E
DEMORALIZED
1 month ago
Anonymous
How much do they pay you down at Eglin?
1 month ago
Anonymous
1 month ago
Anonymous
Finally, a man of culture who responds with something that isn't Reddit-tier
My faith has been temporarily restored in this board
What the fuck is it with people having this perception?
"Annual foreign military financing grants from the United States represent about 16% of the Israeli military budget, according to the Congressional Research Service."
Losing 16% would sting, but it's a far cry from the way you and many others portray the level of aid the USA actually provides.
It's due to the Scofield Bible Commentary. Some dude circa 1905 published a religious commentary which got a lot of views at the time since there weren't many around.
He wasn't exactly a good preacher. The dude was a drunk scammer with a history of sketchy shit behind him who hooked up with israelites to fund his new scam. Of course they suggested some helpful edits lmao since this was at a time when the Zionist movement was getting together.
It spawned one of the major doctrinal schools of Evangelicals.
It's due to the Scofield Bible Commentary. Some dude circa 1905 published a religious commentary which got a lot of views at the time since there weren't many around.
He wasn't exactly a good preacher. The dude was a drunk scammer with a history of sketchy shit behind him who hooked up with israelites to fund his new scam. Of course they suggested some helpful edits lmao since this was at a time when the Zionist movement was getting together.
It spawned one of the major doctrinal schools of Evangelicals.
god i hate that john hagee fucker, he's got my parents in his grip with all that zionist shit. if he told them to literally suck israeli cock for jesus, i think they actually might do it.
That's because it doesn't make sense. And it doesn't make sense because it's not true.
It's a smokescreen.
If evangelicals were the ones in charge as you say, this country wouldn't have gay and trans propaganda dripping out of every hole the way that it does.
Evangelicals hate that stuff.
They only get their way on ONE issue, and that happens to be the issue where their goals align with israelites.
israelites are the problem here.
Stop with your weak babby misdirection.
Im thinking this is based. It is what they get for killing civilians.
this site makes up shit all the time but would be kino though
I never understood the big deal about chemical weapons to be tbh. Nukes I get, and biologicals I get because they could spread or mutate, but at the end of the day if chemicals weapons kill you you're just as dead as if you caught 5.56 with your dome.
Nice try JIDF Nerve Weapons are banned. Enjoy the sanctions for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
China is never going to sanction a country over the use of nerve gas lol. They’ll be delighted. They want to reserve to possibly if using it themselves. Plus China doesn’t give any shits about “human rights”
pretty sure any reasonable person recognizes that Hamas is a terrorist organization
1 month ago
Anonymous
Hamas is a board statement not sure what isreali will use to I'd them, it's like a guerilla outfit any man could be I'd as hamas or is there a way to I'd them? Which ever way this retarded invasion and war has claimed civilian deaths
1 month ago
Anonymous
>any man could be Hamas
This website should require an IQ and history test to post. Holy fuck.
1 month ago
Anonymous
NTA, but yes you need that IQ check.
Any man can literally be Hamas. They do not have mandatory uniforms.
1 month ago
Anonymous
They have membership and units you stupid fuck. This isn't Al Qaeda or an IS cell.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Why would a terrorist group have units and groups? So they are like a legit government? So this is like one army vs another army?
1 month ago
Anonymous
Terrorism is judged by international law according to actions, not if they have uniforms or units lol
Point is Hussein deployed chemical weapons and no one came to the rescue neither Soveits nor US. Dead Iranians? They deserved it.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Saddam was backed by the Soviets and U.S back then due to Cold War shittardery and (semi-justified) anti-Iran sentiment, he found that out the hard way after the Cold War ended.
Assad got bombed to hell and back by NATO every time he used chemical weapons and stopped. If somebody like Sudan or Myanmar used them on civs today you'd sure as fuck see an invasion/intervention by Egypt/Thailand.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Assad got bombed to hell and back by NATO every time he used chemical weapons and stopped
He was bombed regardless.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Indeed, but he was particularly always bombed by NATO after he dropped some gas.
Iraq turned war with Irain around because of chemicals.
"Chemicals sucks" is nothing but propaganda by nuke boys club, trying to smear campaign against chemicals "they not just evil they also suck so let's ban them but nukes ok uwu".
US went against Iraq in 2003 because there were real concerns about possibility of chemicals SQUDs attacks against Israel and US simulation calculated that they had no counter and every missile could easily produce 10000 casualties if aimed at cities.
>Iraq turned war around because of le gas!
No they turned it around because the West and USSR gave them a blank check on weapons and equipment while Iran got jack shit and was choked to death economically and couldn't get almost any equipment. Iraq was also economically subsidized by the Gulf States and Saudi Arabia, a fact largely ignored today. >Chemicals sucks is nothing but propaganda
Against any decent military it does jack shit and is pretty much only used against civs
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Against any decent military it does jack shit and is pretty much only used against civs
Like American military that doesn't even have NBC protection on their Abrams tanks?
You understemate logistics challenges of such defense.
As for effects against civilians that's true for any weapon. How much soldiers you can kill with JDAM if dropped against Frontline fortifications? You would be lucky if you kill squad. But against commieblocks you can kill hundreds. JDAM bad.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Like American military that doesn't even have NBC protection on their Abrams tanks?
???
They have NBC protection you fucking shitskin, what is the point in such a blatant lie that can easily be disproven with one google search?
1 month ago
Anonymous
I want one of these angry guys
1 month ago
Anonymous
you cannot handle my angriest cat it is far too angry
The Einsatzgruppen were officially an anti-terrorist group according to Nazi Germany. Does that mean everything they did was justified because they were fighting "terrorists"? Terrorists can mean any fucking thing the state wants it to mean.
Well it’s not illegal under international law if you’re not a signatory to the Geneva conventions. The esg were tried under “crimes against humanity” which is a different thing. I don’t think anyone would stand to trial over legal use of chemical weapons. Russia has used them famously in terrorist hostage situations as well (killed the hostages though) and no one really cared
1 month ago
Anonymous
>no one really cared
Slavs dying for retarded reason is commonplace
Also, civilians.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Russia has enough power to do whatever it wants, but Israel is a failed state that depends on external donors from all over the world. We will see that all this gas shit will not bring Israel any significant military results, and the associated information costs will be gigantic.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Russia is far more of a “failed state” than Israel, whatever that even means. Even in terms of international isolation, trade, etc.
1 month ago
Anonymous
You dont know the meaning of the words but, but you persistently use them. This is called militant ignorance.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Why are you so mad? Russia is a failed state compared to any first world nation. Even Russians agree with this
1 month ago
Anonymous
Russia is far more of a “failed state” than Israel, whatever that even means. Even in terms of international isolation, trade, etc.
Both are retarded failed states for various reasons
1 month ago
Anonymous
>depends on external donors
yeahhhhh, uhhh, im gonna need you to come in on sunday.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Lets see how the ability to draw up beautiful accounting reports will help Israel when foreign aid stops, fortunately the Israelis are dumb and are bringing this time closer than anyone else.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Israel’s annual budget is 480 billion usd. Its military budget is 23 billion usd. 16% of this budget is foreign aid, making foreign aid 0.73% of Israel’s annual budget.
I doubt they’ll go broken if it stops, anon.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Israel, physically, due to its insufficient population, cannot independently, without external support, provide all the competencies necessary to maintain the state. Reality will always defeat illusions, even those inspired by accounting abstractions.
Alf Prøysen
Geitekillingen som kunne telle til ti
1 month ago
Anonymous
Good thing it won’t stop and your point means nothing 🙂
1 month ago
Anonymous
Can you actually point to what crucial “competencies” israel lacks?
Every country with the capability has a pile of the Hispanicy shit tucked away for a rainy day just in case someone decides to use it on them. One of the reasons Hitler never allowed chemical weapons on the Western front (besides his own experience of getting gassed) was that the allies would retaliate in kind.
Yeah? That’s exactly right and it basically works. It’s how China gets to genocide the Uyghurs with barely any repercussions and the US tortured random guys at Guantanamo. If the enemy can be portrayed as terrorists nobody will defend them because everyone wants to reserve the right to do it as well. It’s how the world works.
If a soldier broke into your house and shot you point blank in the head, would that be considered fine by your standards? After all, you're not in a foreign military, so you aren't covered by Geneva.
It’s illegal under international law to target civilians. Civilians aren’t the same as terrorists, anon. Also, this isn’t about my opinion, it’s about international law and how countries react when these things are done.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Civilians aren’t the same as terrorists, anon
t. not Israel I guess lmao
1 month ago
Anonymous
>civilians aren't the same as terrorists
lol, lmao
1 month ago
Anonymous
You think civilians in international law are defined the same as terrorists? Makes no sense. Sorry.
1 month ago
Anonymous
terrorists are civilians that have been arbitrarily singled out by the state apparatus, there is no meaningful distinction
1 month ago
Anonymous
1 month ago
Anonymous
based
1 month ago
Anonymous
Are you in the bukies thread on PrepHole?
1 month ago
Anonymous
why the fuck would I go to PrepHole, I cook my own food
1 month ago
Anonymous
>PrepHole
Reddit moment.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Well anon, in international law there is an exception made. Which is what the discussion is about. Are you retarded?
1 month ago
Anonymous
>It’s illegal under international law to target civilians.
It's not against International law to kill civilians. If you are conducting a military strike and civilians are killed, that is entirely fine. The only time le international law gets involved is if f you deliberately target civilians for the sake of targeting civilians, then it's illegal. You basically have to be comically evil to break the international law. You could kill 5000 civvies in a single strike, but if that strike was used to successfully kill an enemy, then it's completely ok.
Actually it does if they're
1. Openly carrying weapons
2. Wear a distinct uniform and/or identifying insignia
3. Have a culpable chain of command
Which Hamas admittedly does. Thing is I don't think Israel nor Hamas signed that article.
>Fuck around, find out >"America, help me! I can't wage a war against malnourished sandnaggers by myself, it'll literally be another Shoah!"
Absolute State of Israel
There's no Amerislaves with the will to fight and potential materiel is already at record lows due to both divestment and Ukraine. The U.S simply can't do Nickel Grass in 2023.
You don't need actual American boots on the ground to invade Gaza. You just need the Americans to ensure replenishment of all the missiles for the Iron Dome free of charge like they're already doing. Plus giving access to all the satellites, etc.
Amerislaves will ALWAYS serve their master.
1 month ago
Anonymous
We were already giving them Iron Dome for free, that's not really a factor and it never was. Hezbollah and the militias around Israel have far more rockets than any number of batteries could counter, and that's their strategy. >Satellites
Near-useless in urban warfare against militants.
1 month ago
Anonymous
They weren't expending their missiles at the same rate, however.
And satellites are invaluable.
Why are Muslim shills like this?
Israel is literally being told to hold back and take it easy on Gaza by USA, they're not asking for help
If not for the US, Gaza would be nuked already
>Israel is literally being told to hold back and take it easy on Gaza by USA, they're not asking for help
Yet they're going to use nerve gas, which has good chance to leak to civilian inhabited areas. I may be mistaking, but I'm pretty sure that the second Iraq war started because Saddam was (wrongly) suspected to have that kind of weapon in stock. But when it's Israel that's fine apparently.
>Yet they're going to use nerve gas
They're not, you dumb sandnagger. Stop regurgitating these plot points you've been fed by Al Jazeera, Israeli hostages are in those tunnels and unlike you ragheads, the israelites actually care about preserving the lives of their people.
I think we can all agree any concept of a geneva convention or "rules of war" is a complete and utter farce at this point
when things start party rockin here in the states I have a feeling they'll show no restraint, even at the beginning
more and more the bell riots look like a blue print for what's to come
I never understood the big deal about chemical weapons to be tbh. Nukes I get, and biologicals I get because they could spread or mutate, but at the end of the day if chemicals weapons kill you you're just as dead as if you caught 5.56 with your dome.
I'm guessing with chemical weapons, there's issues with controlling the spread, similar to but not necessarily on the same scale as biological weapons. Plus at least 5.56 to the dome is more or less instant, and you don't spread your last moments vomiting out half of your internal organs.
This. Half the reason gas was restricted in WW2 was that a lot of the military leaders had been grunts in WW1 and did not remember the gas fondly. Some forces did end up gassing themselves too, although they were usually ready for it since they were using it in the first place.
>biologicals I get because they could spread or mutate,
China killed tens of millions of people using bioweapons and got away with it, yet all the hypocrites say that chemicals should be banned. Weird, chemical weapons are not even that dangerous.
Compared to bioweapons (e.g. COVID-19) - yes, most chemical weapons are not dangerous. They don't kill millions of people or cause hundreds of millions to suffer the horrible consequences 3 years after contamination. They either kill you instantly or mutilate you for life, but they don't affect everyone who may contact you. And there are way more people who survived after being poisoned with, say Novichok, than there are those who didn't have severe symptoms after COVID-19.
>never understood the big deal about chemical weapons
World War I is knocking, just in time for Halloween. You should search some images up and do some history & shit.
This guy isnt a mustard gas survivor. He was a pilot who got in a crash and got burned by fuel. What you are seeing is the first attempts to do a graft. It got infected and he died.
>I never understood the big deal about chemical weapons to be tbh.
It's "poorfags" nuke.
See there is big boys nuke club. This club enjoys safety due to having weapons of mass destruction, see Russia and their threats "noooooks nooks nooks!" And entrance into this club is gatekeeped much while weapons themselves are legal.
Gatekeeping chemical weapons is much much more difficult. So these weapons can be seen as soft counter to the nuclear blackmail of Russians and US. So chemicals were banned and got "omg ebil!" status when nukes are not.
Iraq turned war with Irain around because of chemicals.
"Chemicals sucks" is nothing but propaganda by nuke boys club, trying to smear campaign against chemicals "they not just evil they also suck so let's ban them but nukes ok uwu".
US went against Iraq in 2003 because there were real concerns about possibility of chemicals SQUDs attacks against Israel and US simulation calculated that they had no counter and every missile could easily produce 10000 casualties if aimed at cities.
Because fighting in MOPP 4 sucks major ass in ideal conditions and is quasi-impossible if it's adverse at all.
Nobody wants to fucking deal with that so it's become something of a gentleman's agreement.
This of course doesn't mean CW use against a powerful nation won't happen.
But if it does, there will be a mighty shit wind blowing.
youve never understood why polluting vast amounts of land with poisonous chemicals that will mutilate or kill the people and lands and waters there for decades is a big deal? would you like to drink some tap water from palestine, ohio to put your money where your mouth is homosexual?
so you trust chinese to use nerve agents that dissolve in nature quickly? if only there was some sort of...international law or treaty that regulated these things so everyone would be on the same page
They're really unpleasant to defend against, but for the kind of big military powers who dictate which weapons are "allowed", there's no real need to use them. The same amount of conventional explosives will kill you just as dead as nerve gas.
It's kind of like how you can't use soft-point bullets. It's just more pleasant to deal with full metal jacket wounds, and there's no actual benefit to hurting an already wounded enemy more. No one with any clout has any reason to oppose the ban.
>Shoots an ICBM with a nerve agent at a city center >sprays hundreds of thousands, killing them immediately >gets into the water supply, and particle drift kills an extra hundred thousand and many more receiving permanent injury from exposure >City is also permanently contaminated. A major center of commerce is effectively shut down >”what’s the big deal?”
It’s a taboo because when you start to play with full-scale chemical warfare, it quickly resembles a neutron bomb in it’s toxicity and disturbing effects.
Pic related guarantees my right to own high-quality military-grade nerve gas in whatever quantities I care to stockpile.
Friendly reminder that all weapons are horrific, and the only reason that nerve gas is banned is because it's simply way too overpowered in the meta, but there's no known way to both cheaply & effectively mitigate or "nerf" it.
>goes everywhere but tends to "stack" to about double man-height above the battlefield, enveloping everything between the vapordeck and the dirt
>simple gas masks are not enough; you need head-to-toe airtight protective garments, and your spine bends backwards into a U-shape as you die in agony if you so much as cut open your suit and get some nerve gas directly onto your exposed skin, or even if it seeps through your fabric garment layers
>totally denies a given area to any human who isn't inside of a sealed environment with its own atmosphere supply or superb filtration
>kills campers in call of duty: warzone
>cheap & plentiful
>half life of minutes or hours; it's mostly gone after a single windy day, and a few of days worth of rain or sunshine is enough to make 99.999999% of the nerve gas chemically react ("burn up") leaving innert molecular residue (and probably lots of dead bugs), so there's no specter of long-term fallout
>great for booby-traps
>outstanding for urban & subterranean combat
>_<
>using nerve gas is literally fumigating for anthropoids instead of arthropods
The few times nerve gas has actually been used, it wasn't anywhere near that effective. The Tokyo subway sarin attack in 1995 killed 13 people and severely injured 50. Those are rookie numbers.
They couldn’t manager dispersal right. No aerosol etc. if they would have they could have killed hundreds easily. They basically just left punctured bags of sarin there and if you touched them you died. One guy dumped his bag on the floor but again, that’s terrible dispersal
>The few times nerve gas has actually been used, it wasn't anywhere near that effective.
Iraq repeatedly used nerve agents to great effect in the Iran-Iraq war and that also stands as both their only confirmed wartime usage IIRC. Second, aside from the Tokyo attacks as far as I know the only times that nerve agents have ever intentionally been employed outside of the Iran-Iraq war is in assassinations like the Skirpal incident and Kim Jong-Un knocking off his sibling in Indonesia or wherever that was.
>The Tokyo subway sarin attack in 1995 killed 13 people and severely injured 50. Those are rookie numbers.
Yeah, rookie numbers for a rookie attempt. They had good lab equipment and financial backing but poor technical knowledge and their execution was absolute mickey mouse shit; in one of their attacks they literally just drove around a van with a heater and a tub of shoddy GB inside and fans blowing out the windows. If they had had better engineering and chemistry skills, a better plan for deployment and better methods of dispersal they could have manufactured hundreds of pounds of pure GB complete with the appropriate munitions and easily racked up a five-figure kill count. Imagine scores of properly constructed multi-kilo GB bombs on timers being stashed in high-traffic areas - it would have brought the entire country to its knees.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zone_rouge
multiple shellings, often all that was left was the husk of trees
Chemical weapons are for the denial of land. But not from the enemy, from humanity
Honestly based. It teaches the terrorists and the hostages the same lesson. No one is making it out. Which makes future terrorists question the idea of making demands and teaches civilians to fight to the last breath cause no one is saving them.
>m-muh women and children
All life is valuable. Therefore, there is no meaningful difference between killing enemy fighters and killing civilians. The only thing that matters is the strategic effect it has on the war. If the women and children are in the way, it's as just to kill them as any other human. And if the goals of the war do not justify the deaths of a few hundred thousand innocent people, then the war itself is unjust, and the only moral action you could take is unconditional surrender.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Life has the value people choose to assign to it, and that definition is mutable but enforced through retaliatory violence. You aren't wrong entirely though- like I said, the value is mutable. For a more...insectile culture, such as the Chinese, they might quite literally eat their children, wives, and finally parents before killing adult men of reproductive age. The 'soldier ants' are priority.
>Which makes future terrorists question the idea of making demands
Doesn't work that way. They simply switched tactics. Instead of taking hostages and making demands they now blow up bombs in public places and make demands afterwards.
Was hearing about the hanible doctrine in idf some people are protesting about there families being killed cos of the doctrine israelites are calling these israelites traitors, I just dont understand these people they kill themselves and have no charity. These people are behaving exact opposite to israeli teachings.
Imagine if the headline read: >Exclusive: Iran will flood Israel with nerve gas under Chinese navy supervision
Would there be an outcry?
What would they say at the Hague?
>Palestinian resistance groups expect Israel to flood Hamas tunnels with nerve gas and chemical weapons under the surveillance of US Delta Force commandos as part of a surprise attack on the Gaza Strip, a senior Arab source familiar with the groups told Middle East Eye. >Palestinian resistance groups expect
>Delta Force >US Navy
Fuckers can’t even be bothered to look up which special forces are from which branch, just mash together whatever terms they heard in the latest Steven Segal movie.
Besides the US has zero offensive chemical warfare experience why the fuck would they be contributing to this? This is “hello sir this is IRS calling sir you must pay late fees in Best Buy gift cards now sir” tier bullshit.
It's not nerve gas, just common pesticide.
Besides, what are they gonna do with roughly 6 million dead Hamas fighters?
Those bodies aren't gonna just dispose of themselves.
Helping the strongest Middle Eastern army curbstomp some fucking residential neighbourhood that has some militiamen in it?
They did really need 3 carrier battlegroups?
>They did really need 3 carrier battlegroups?
They're not there for Gaza, they're there for Iran and its proxies when they throw their inevitable geopolitical shitfit over Israel attempting to turn Gaza into Mosul.
>They're not there for Gaza, they're there for Iran and its proxies when they throw their inevitable geopolitical shitfit over Israel attempting to turn Gaza into Mosul.
Turkey is also throwing a fit and calling Hamas the resistance
It's almost certainly not real considering how PR-sensitive the present administration is in the US and this will go down about as well as bombing Gaza with WP again. It'd unironically be one of the least bad solutions to the tunnel warfare problem if a sufficiently nonlethal agent was chosen.
>all these anons talking about using big boy countries with chemical weapon stockpiles >they don’t realize America has transitioned its chemical corps to a strictly defensive/cleanup force who gets their reps in assisting with civilian chemical accidents because modern chemical weapons are even more lethal than nuclear
In a chemical first strike scenario with nerve gas the target is dead as fuck with zero hope of surviving >t. CBRN guy
>I don't want to hear another fucking word about the Holocaust EVER again
Then dont plan on watching a movie or any tv news show ever again.
Thats all they say when talking about Israel. You would think every week theres a holocaust
>No uniform >Hide amongst the civilians >Mass casualty strikes against civilians
Nerve gas is better than these "people" deserve.
Want to be treated with respect?
Put on a uniform, get non-combatants out of your camps, and fight like a real military.
>launch surprise attack (good) against your enemy (great) using commando forces (brilliant) >overrun enemy military bases (amazing) capture enemy equipment including tanks (wow) even capture enemy soldiers (10/10) >use the next 6 hours of mayhem to kill literal civilians, ignoring almost all genuine military objectives >use priceless forces and munitions to gun down a bunch of foreigners at a rave in the desert >go door to door killing old ladies >cry foul when you get bombed for the next month
Hamas was never going to just get away with a surprise attack but Christ it's like they tried to pick the absolute worst option available.
No we don't. France already banned Pro-Palestine gatherings, any attempted ones in Eastern Europe got ganked by local gypsies and the rest of the West is on the way.
Every last motherfucker that signed the open letter supporting Hamas will lose their job.
Are you saying the israelites carried out the raid? Which Hamas took credit for? And published videos of on all its telegram channels? That makes no sense anon I’m sorry
almost like it makes no sense that roosvelt knew about the raid on pearl harbor before it happened but let it go forth anyway to give him his desired pretext to join the war with england?
or how it makes no sense that the CIA and FBI were paying the 9/11 hijackers and following them closely yet somehow managed to allow the attacks to happen then publish the videos all over CIA propganda (CNN) 24/7 to justify invasion of iraq? are you saying america really was really attacked in the gulf of tonkin by imaginary NVA forces, and published the results of the fake attack on imaginary forces all over the israelite york times and every tv and newspaper station in the country to justify war in vietnam? that makes no sense anon im sorry. why would they lie? why would an FBI agent put on a MAGA hat and shout at everyone to enter the capital that makes no sense im sorry.
1 month ago
Anonymous
That’s not a false flag though. I thought when you said false flag you meant an actual false flag operation. No need to get flustered
1 month ago
Anonymous
do you have any evidence that proves mossad was not involved in directing the hamas attacks?
1 month ago
Anonymous
https://i.imgur.com/joNf5ip.png
>that even Hamas doesn’t claim
have you ever heard of the term "useful idiot"? its someone who you trick into doing your bidding because they are disposable, and can take all the blame. the best manipulation is the one where the useful idiot thinks its his own idea and hes working on his own agenda. why dont you google the creation of hamas and its origins, you have some light reading to do tonight which might surprise you
Are you saying Hamas is mossad’s puppet? Why didn’t you just say that before it’s such a simple claim.
And no. I don’t believe that’s true. It doesn’t make much sense to me.
1 month ago
Anonymous
its hard to accept that people this retarded exist but then i remember most people here are tiktok zoomers who grew up since birth playing iphone games instead of reading or learning how to think for themselves in school
1 month ago
Anonymous
Fuck off anon not everything is 50D chess
1 month ago
Anonymous
I just don’t think israel planned this attack out, anon. It makes no sense to me. I accept claims like “Israel created Hamas” etc but I don’t think it was a false flag attack. I think it’s the same thing as Britain being responsible for the ira existing but they had no clue about the incoming bombings
because they need pretext to invade and remove gaza from their territory retard
1 month ago
Anonymous
Are you saying the israelites did the raid on Israel? I’m just trying to understand what your reasoning is. You’re saying something very odd that even Hamas doesn’t claim
1 month ago
Anonymous
>that even Hamas doesn’t claim
have you ever heard of the term "useful idiot"? its someone who you trick into doing your bidding because they are disposable, and can take all the blame. the best manipulation is the one where the useful idiot thinks its his own idea and hes working on his own agenda. why dont you google the creation of hamas and its origins, you have some light reading to do tonight which might surprise you
1 month ago
Anonymous
Not him but imagine you're this ethnically homogenous country surrounded by hostile nations. And in the center left of your country is a city full of a hostile group of people which number almost 1/5th of your whole nations population. So it's a lot of people who pose a significant security and stability problem for your country, especially if they got loose from their makeshift prison city walls. Ok, now imagine you get a lot of free money from gullible retards all over the world. Now if you decided one day you had enough of this security risk, you were just going to invade and send millions of these hostile people out of your land and inflame all the hostile nations surrounding you. The resulting humanitarian issues would also harm the goodwill of your financial benefactors around the world. Would it be easier to do this, if you could justify it as self defense? Perhaps if these prison city people attacked you first?
1 month ago
Anonymous
That’s all fine and I agree but I just don’t believe Hamas is controlled by mossad. I think the Israelis were genuinely caught by surprise on October 7th
1 month ago
Anonymous
>ethnically homogenous country
Israel isn't an ethnically homogeneous. I know American education is not fantastic, but at least read a wikipedia page on a country before starting typing whole paragraphs on it.
1 month ago
Anonymous
How do the Palestinefags reconcile the fact 20% of Israeli is Arab and fucking hates the Palestinians?
1 month ago
Anonymous
what % is israeli? 30%? 40%?
1 month ago
Anonymous
Israel is about 70% israeli, but there are a number of different israeli ethnic groups. Basically it ranges from white, brown, browner, black. White israelites are more or less in the minority, making up something like less than 40% of the israeli population, and most at this point are mixed race, except new arrivals from NA.
I guess techically water is a nerve gas if you really stretch the definition really far.
Enough of it and it shuts down the nerves due to lack of eletrolytes. >Water intoxication, also known as water poisoning, hyperhydration, overhydration, or water toxemia, is a potentially fatal disturbance in brain functions that results when the normal balance of electrolytes in the body is pushed outside safe limits by excessive water intake.
Well that or drowning.
This Middle East Eye account is a blatant Iranian funded propaganda account. If you look at their tweets (which are all inaccessible unless you have a twitter account thanks Musk why are twitter screenshot posts not an auto-ban) it's just shit about Israel oppressing poor Gaza, Gaza having no electricity, everyone hates Israel, death toll this, fucking Roblox users staging a rally that.
There's a bunch of these accounts and they all popped up after Musk changed the verification system and added monetization. One notable user discovered the concept of forward deployment of USAF bombers at RAF Fairford and acted like the US was 20 minutes away from glassing Iran (with B-1Bs which can't carry nukes) and just ignored anyone telling him he was wrong. He did it because he got 2 million impressions and corresponding ad revenue.
What I'm trying to say is that it doesn't matter if Israel has chemical weapons, or how the US would respond to their use in Gaza or Syria or Iran. They're not going to be used and OP's screenshot is a blatant lie.
>This Middle East Eye account is a blatant Iranian funded propaganda account.
MEE looks like a joint Qatari and Turkish jam and they back Hamas.
>There's a bunch of these accounts and they all popped up after Musk changed the verification system and added monetization.
Right. People now buy verification and then have incentives to post B.S. that will go viral as a way of making money but it wrecked Twitter as a useful source of information.
It's kinda poetic isnt it theres always that joke or s history of how israelites get gassed now the gassing is on the other foot and israelites will be the ones gassing people it's just so strange we are going full circle
In 40 years time will we be talking about how all of this is fake and some one will try to say how it's real and shit
If Israel gassed Gaza/West Bank they'd be Myanmar/Apartheid South Africa/North Korea tier on the world stage. Nobody would want anything to do with them. Nobody even in Israel is that retarded.
TLDR: OP is retarded
Chemical weapons are on the same tier as landmines, a temporary benefit that turns into a longterm problem that kills a shitload more people than the ones you're fighting.
how is this legal? and how is this a good precedent to set? this will basically give the greenlight to russians, chinks, and literally every other nation to use chemical weapons at will and we will have no moral authority to intervene or complain
I would like to remind you that these are not some wild caves, but a gigantic network of man-made mine workings with ventilation. While the ventilation system is working, it will be difficult to fill these tunnels with gas.
Pic related guarantees my right to own high-quality military-grade nerve gas in whatever quantities I care to stockpile.
Friendly reminder that all weapons are horrific, and the only reason that nerve gas is banned is because it's simply way too overpowered in the meta, but there's no known way to both cheaply & effectively mitigate or "nerf" it.
>goes everywhere but tends to "stack" to about double man-height above the battlefield, enveloping everything between the vapordeck and the dirt
>simple gas masks are not enough; you need head-to-toe airtight protective garments, and your spine bends backwards into a U-shape as you die in agony if you so much as cut open your suit and get some nerve gas directly onto your exposed skin, or even if it seeps through your fabric garment layers
>totally denies a given area to any human who isn't inside of a sealed environment with its own atmosphere supply or superb filtration
>kills campers in call of duty: warzone
>cheap & plentiful
>half life of minutes or hours; it's mostly gone after a single windy day, and a few of days worth of rain or sunshine is enough to make 99.999999% of the nerve gas chemically react ("burn up") leaving innert molecular residue (and probably lots of dead bugs), so there's no specter of long-term fallout
>great for booby-traps
>outstanding for urban & subterranean combat
>_<
>using nerve gas is literally fumigating for anthropoids instead of arthropods
Piss off, dune coon. Stop regurgitating Jihadi propaganda here and go find a child-bride to marry, a goat to fuck or whatever it is that you towel-heads do for fun.
The thing I find disturbing about calls for a ceasefire is that none of the people who are calling for it are saying Hamas should hand hostages back. Not one. I haven't heard a single politician/important figure who whines about the plight of Ham...Gaza say about what should be given for a ceasefire given that Hamas constantly breaks them.
They also don't criticise Egypt and Jordon for equally besieging Gaza.
The absolute state of post-Russian Invasion /k/. How the fuck did a thread this shit based on completely made up bullshit from a anonymous twitter screencap create a 325 post thread with 170 people? This fucking board will be as bad as PrepHole and PrepHole in 12 months.
We can only hope so anon. In war the most important thing is to have fun.
What's with the Americans always handholding Israel. They probably couldn't even wipe their asses without America
why do anything themselves if they can get the Americans to pay for it?
Hope it happens the way the Chinese and 3rd workers treat factory workers is depressing only down side is your iPads and phones will be expensive then again we can buy a Samsung or south korean shit
Apple is hit anyway
theyre allies against the common enemy of "terror" and hamas has american civvies as hostages
Otherwise the US wouldnt do so much as hust sending and selling weapons.
but i guess its also a good example of what alliances are supposed to look like for third worlders.
If you think the US is deploying carrier groups for a few American tourists that got kidnapped you are smoking crack. There's a very real chance of this escalating into a bigger conflict and the Pentagon is going into overdrive in an attempt to clamp down on the situation before it gets out of hand.
Bullshit speculative headline.
they absolutely would send a CSG because they dont have to negotiate with hamas the same way you have to negotiate with a major country like russia.
And yeah, its not just about american civvies, its about iran, saudi arabia, and israel, the three power players in the region responsible for the entire world's energy. but the "handholding" that the navy is doing is absolutely only as far as saving hostages, if not a good opportunity to get some experience with the crew.
So yeah. its both the hostages and the context of the situation. but its definitely not because of some schizo israeli conspiracy.
and to all that say that americans dont care about amerucan hostages we traded the nick cage lord of war arms dealer people made a literal movie about, for a WNBA player nobody knew until the switch happened
>Why does the US actively protect its own glorified airfield and 52nd state in the Levant
Israel is the only country in the Middle East that isn't occupied by America and that has no American military bases.
>He doesn't know
Know what?
No, Israel is not an American state. But America and Israel might both be privately owned states, like like all countries of the British Empire or the Commonwealth are privately owned by 1 royal family.
Indeed, that I can agree on brother
The US stores a massive arsenal in Israel for use in that part of the world at six separate sites, according to wikipedia. They let the Israelis borrow some munitions that were about to expire, once, but it required a vote from Congress to do so.
A lot of that supply has been depleted due to Ukraine however
And?
>And?
That kneecaps potential supply to both Israel and Ukraine going forward given this war is increasingly looking like a complicated regional one(if it actually happens)
That implies the us can’t produce more, you aren’t stupid enough to suggest that right?
I'm not saying the U.S can't produce more, I'm saying it's going to be very hard for the U.S to keep up with demand for two massive wars when it's already having issues political and economic keeping up with one, not to mention supply for the U.S military itself.
I am demoralized
Were you trying to greentext me, or are you serious?
I AM DEMORALIZED better hang myself the west has fallen
It's a fact that the U.S has done a shit job at mobilizing and reorienting it's MIC since Ukraine broke out. I'm not saying it can't bounce back, just that it's going to have a very hard time in the immediate future if things get really hot in the Middle East.
An then there's the political/economic side of stuff.
I AM DEMORALIZED THE WEST HAS FALLEN MASS SUICIDES ABOUND
You guys are worse than /misc/ sometimes
D
E
M
O
R
A
L
I
Z
E
DEMORALIZED
How much do they pay you down at Eglin?
Finally, a man of culture who responds with something that isn't Reddit-tier
My faith has been temporarily restored in this board
>Reddit
DEMORALIZED
DEZILAROMED
DEFIBRILATED
>that has no American military bases.
That's because it's a separate branch of the US military.
War on terror, nigga
It's mostly a tard-tard wrangler situation. Same with Ukraine, your allies doing warcrimes using your money and tech is bad PR.
Except no one cares what happens to Russia, they’ve somehow managed to go beyond the pale
Because Israel controls the us
The Samson Option. Israel is the United State's petulant child that would burn down the entire world to prove a point.
What the fuck is it with people having this perception?
"Annual foreign military financing grants from the United States represent about 16% of the Israeli military budget, according to the Congressional Research Service."
Losing 16% would sting, but it's a far cry from the way you and many others portray the level of aid the USA actually provides.
Unironic answer: look up what AIPAC is
The Evangelical Right demands the israelites be in control of the Holy Land so that Armageddon will occur properly.
No, I don't get it either.
It's due to the Scofield Bible Commentary. Some dude circa 1905 published a religious commentary which got a lot of views at the time since there weren't many around.
He wasn't exactly a good preacher. The dude was a drunk scammer with a history of sketchy shit behind him who hooked up with israelites to fund his new scam. Of course they suggested some helpful edits lmao since this was at a time when the Zionist movement was getting together.
It spawned one of the major doctrinal schools of Evangelicals.
god i hate that john hagee fucker, he's got my parents in his grip with all that zionist shit. if he told them to literally suck israeli cock for jesus, i think they actually might do it.
That's because it doesn't make sense. And it doesn't make sense because it's not true.
It's a smokescreen.
If evangelicals were the ones in charge as you say, this country wouldn't have gay and trans propaganda dripping out of every hole the way that it does.
Evangelicals hate that stuff.
They only get their way on ONE issue, and that happens to be the issue where their goals align with israelites.
israelites are the problem here.
Stop with your weak babby misdirection.
they bribe our politicians
it's not like leftist americans have any other option to vote for lol
Maybe you should fuck off then if that's what you want to talk about.
Warcrime also why does US have nerve agents?
Nerve agents are commonly used in fumigating military barracks.
Nice try JIDF Nerve Weapons are banned. Enjoy the sanctions for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
>sanctions
By who?
China
lol. China isn't going to sanction the US, and if they did that's good for the US.
China hasn't been anti-Zionist since Deng took power
China is never going to sanction a country over the use of nerve gas lol. They’ll be delighted. They want to reserve to possibly if using it themselves. Plus China doesn’t give any shits about “human rights”
terrorist rats hiding in tunnels aren't human, no war crime happened
>terrorist
more human than a israelite though
rules of war do not apply to terrorists
One mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter
Don't be so narrow minded anon
no they are objectively terrorists
You must be 18 to post here
Freedom fighters don't behead or rape people
How convenient would it be if every war you ever fought was against terrorists, and you alone would get to decide who is a terrorist
yes, everything must be inconvenient
big iq
yes it is convenient
Sucks to be you I guess
In isreali eyes everyones a terrorist
israelites and the Benjamin Netanyahu is going to burn in hell for a long time
pretty sure any reasonable person recognizes that Hamas is a terrorist organization
Hamas is a board statement not sure what isreali will use to I'd them, it's like a guerilla outfit any man could be I'd as hamas or is there a way to I'd them? Which ever way this retarded invasion and war has claimed civilian deaths
>any man could be Hamas
This website should require an IQ and history test to post. Holy fuck.
NTA, but yes you need that IQ check.
Any man can literally be Hamas. They do not have mandatory uniforms.
They have membership and units you stupid fuck. This isn't Al Qaeda or an IS cell.
Why would a terrorist group have units and groups? So they are like a legit government? So this is like one army vs another army?
Terrorism is judged by international law according to actions, not if they have uniforms or units lol
>Nice try JIDF Nerve Weapons are banned.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_chemical_attacks_against_Iran
Ah yes, because we all know Saddam Hussein is the paragon of military genius
Point is Hussein deployed chemical weapons and no one came to the rescue neither Soveits nor US. Dead Iranians? They deserved it.
Saddam was backed by the Soviets and U.S back then due to Cold War shittardery and (semi-justified) anti-Iran sentiment, he found that out the hard way after the Cold War ended.
Assad got bombed to hell and back by NATO every time he used chemical weapons and stopped. If somebody like Sudan or Myanmar used them on civs today you'd sure as fuck see an invasion/intervention by Egypt/Thailand.
>Assad got bombed to hell and back by NATO every time he used chemical weapons and stopped
He was bombed regardless.
Indeed, but he was particularly always bombed by NATO after he dropped some gas.
>Iraq turned war around because of le gas!
No they turned it around because the West and USSR gave them a blank check on weapons and equipment while Iran got jack shit and was choked to death economically and couldn't get almost any equipment. Iraq was also economically subsidized by the Gulf States and Saudi Arabia, a fact largely ignored today.
>Chemicals sucks is nothing but propaganda
Against any decent military it does jack shit and is pretty much only used against civs
>Against any decent military it does jack shit and is pretty much only used against civs
Like American military that doesn't even have NBC protection on their Abrams tanks?
You understemate logistics challenges of such defense.
As for effects against civilians that's true for any weapon. How much soldiers you can kill with JDAM if dropped against Frontline fortifications? You would be lucky if you kill squad. But against commieblocks you can kill hundreds. JDAM bad.
>Like American military that doesn't even have NBC protection on their Abrams tanks?
???
They have NBC protection you fucking shitskin, what is the point in such a blatant lie that can easily be disproven with one google search?
I want one of these angry guys
you cannot handle my angriest cat it is far too angry
Chemical weapons aren’t banned for use against terrorists anon. None of that shit applies to terrorists
The Einsatzgruppen were officially an anti-terrorist group according to Nazi Germany. Does that mean everything they did was justified because they were fighting "terrorists"? Terrorists can mean any fucking thing the state wants it to mean.
Well it’s not illegal under international law if you’re not a signatory to the Geneva conventions. The esg were tried under “crimes against humanity” which is a different thing. I don’t think anyone would stand to trial over legal use of chemical weapons. Russia has used them famously in terrorist hostage situations as well (killed the hostages though) and no one really cared
>no one really cared
Slavs dying for retarded reason is commonplace
Also, civilians.
Russia has enough power to do whatever it wants, but Israel is a failed state that depends on external donors from all over the world. We will see that all this gas shit will not bring Israel any significant military results, and the associated information costs will be gigantic.
Russia is far more of a “failed state” than Israel, whatever that even means. Even in terms of international isolation, trade, etc.
You dont know the meaning of the words but, but you persistently use them. This is called militant ignorance.
Why are you so mad? Russia is a failed state compared to any first world nation. Even Russians agree with this
Both are retarded failed states for various reasons
>depends on external donors
yeahhhhh, uhhh, im gonna need you to come in on sunday.
Lets see how the ability to draw up beautiful accounting reports will help Israel when foreign aid stops, fortunately the Israelis are dumb and are bringing this time closer than anyone else.
Israel’s annual budget is 480 billion usd. Its military budget is 23 billion usd. 16% of this budget is foreign aid, making foreign aid 0.73% of Israel’s annual budget.
I doubt they’ll go broken if it stops, anon.
Israel, physically, due to its insufficient population, cannot independently, without external support, provide all the competencies necessary to maintain the state. Reality will always defeat illusions, even those inspired by accounting abstractions.
Alf Prøysen
Geitekillingen som kunne telle til ti
Good thing it won’t stop and your point means nothing 🙂
Can you actually point to what crucial “competencies” israel lacks?
Russia is a failed state.
>implying nerve gas for humans and insects are the same.
the absolute state of this board.
Name a bedbug that can survive VX. I'll wait.
This didnt the nazis use zykclon b to kill off fleas durring ww2?
>fell for the delousing meme
Yes and also a few million people.
Un-Ironically this but make one israelites+NATO and the other literally any other force on the planet.
You got one shot at living in this infinite universe and you rolled Palestinian dirt farmer. GG No Re.
Everyone who can has nerve agents. More countries have them than have nukes.
Every country with the capability has a pile of the Hispanicy shit tucked away for a rainy day just in case someone decides to use it on them. One of the reasons Hitler never allowed chemical weapons on the Western front (besides his own experience of getting gassed) was that the allies would retaliate in kind.
Why does usa have gas gas kill people we don't have gas penis why usa bad
excellently good bait
>Didn't sign the Geneva convention
Not my problem
If you are a country with an industrial base and competent chemist you have chemical weapons at your disposal.
The Geneva convention doesn't apply to insurgents and terrorists retard.
By that logic any country can use any weapon banned under geneva if they percieve the opponent as a terrorist. You are retarded
Yeah? That’s exactly right and it basically works. It’s how China gets to genocide the Uyghurs with barely any repercussions and the US tortured random guys at Guantanamo. If the enemy can be portrayed as terrorists nobody will defend them because everyone wants to reserve the right to do it as well. It’s how the world works.
If a soldier broke into your house and shot you point blank in the head, would that be considered fine by your standards? After all, you're not in a foreign military, so you aren't covered by Geneva.
It’s illegal under international law to target civilians. Civilians aren’t the same as terrorists, anon. Also, this isn’t about my opinion, it’s about international law and how countries react when these things are done.
>Civilians aren’t the same as terrorists, anon
t. not Israel I guess lmao
>civilians aren't the same as terrorists
lol, lmao
You think civilians in international law are defined the same as terrorists? Makes no sense. Sorry.
terrorists are civilians that have been arbitrarily singled out by the state apparatus, there is no meaningful distinction
based
Are you in the bukies thread on PrepHole?
why the fuck would I go to PrepHole, I cook my own food
>PrepHole
Reddit moment.
Well anon, in international law there is an exception made. Which is what the discussion is about. Are you retarded?
>It’s illegal under international law to target civilians.
It's not against International law to kill civilians. If you are conducting a military strike and civilians are killed, that is entirely fine. The only time le international law gets involved is if f you deliberately target civilians for the sake of targeting civilians, then it's illegal. You basically have to be comically evil to break the international law. You could kill 5000 civvies in a single strike, but if that strike was used to successfully kill an enemy, then it's completely ok.
Moreover, even if it is illegal, no one cares.
Actually it does if they're
1. Openly carrying weapons
2. Wear a distinct uniform and/or identifying insignia
3. Have a culpable chain of command
Which Hamas admittedly does. Thing is I don't think Israel nor Hamas signed that article.
As appropriate as it would be to gas Hamas's tunnels - one of the few good use cases for chemical weapons - this is not a trustworthy source.
The US doesn't, it's destroyed its chemical weapon stockpiles. I'm sure they keep some tucked away for research, but probably not enough to use.
What kind of question is that
Why wouldn't we have the greatest chemical weapons?
Nigga we made the f 22, starlink, Ford super carriers
Jesus we've been constantly working on chemical weapons 100 years. We never stopped
Fucking "Le Question Man" is real. Why even ask this?
So they're gonna do it themselves while also preemptively framing Israel as the fall guy. Pretty base tbh if you ask me
No anon, the nerve gas is punishment for Hamas' crimes against.humanity. Fuck around, find out, habibi.
>Fuck around, find out
>"America, help me! I can't wage a war against malnourished sandnaggers by myself, it'll literally be another Shoah!"
Absolute State of Israel
Why not take advantage of amerislaves if you can?
There's no Amerislaves with the will to fight and potential materiel is already at record lows due to both divestment and Ukraine. The U.S simply can't do Nickel Grass in 2023.
You don't need actual American boots on the ground to invade Gaza. You just need the Americans to ensure replenishment of all the missiles for the Iron Dome free of charge like they're already doing. Plus giving access to all the satellites, etc.
Amerislaves will ALWAYS serve their master.
We were already giving them Iron Dome for free, that's not really a factor and it never was. Hezbollah and the militias around Israel have far more rockets than any number of batteries could counter, and that's their strategy.
>Satellites
Near-useless in urban warfare against militants.
They weren't expending their missiles at the same rate, however.
And satellites are invaluable.
Why are Muslim shills like this?
Israel is literally being told to hold back and take it easy on Gaza by USA, they're not asking for help
If not for the US, Gaza would be nuked already
>Israel is literally being told to hold back and take it easy on Gaza by USA, they're not asking for help
Yet they're going to use nerve gas, which has good chance to leak to civilian inhabited areas. I may be mistaking, but I'm pretty sure that the second Iraq war started because Saddam was (wrongly) suspected to have that kind of weapon in stock. But when it's Israel that's fine apparently.
They're going to use it to clear the tunnels after the civilians have been evacuated above ground
Why are you trying to spread misinformation?
israelite
The mudslime mutters his last resort words when failing his Taqiya in hopes of gaining sympathy
Wont work here
I knew this board was full of israelites and Zionist shills, but I never thought you’d be so obvious and open about it
it's completely full of them. It's ridiculous. at least they are obvious about showing their hand.
if you don't like opposing opinions so much why not go back to the pol echo chamber?
Honestly I just hate Muslims with all my heart
I really hope you die by falling into pig's blood
You so desperately want to believe I’m muslim kek this may come as a shock, but most of the world hates your fucking guts, not just muzzies.
I'm American
I just saw you repeating Muslim shilling messages so I assumed your one of them
>wahh you disagree with me so you must be a zionist shill
pathetic crybaby is upset someone calls him out for being wrong
>Yet they're going to use nerve gas
They're not, you dumb sandnagger. Stop regurgitating these plot points you've been fed by Al Jazeera, Israeli hostages are in those tunnels and unlike you ragheads, the israelites actually care about preserving the lives of their people.
>If not for the US, Gaza would be nuked already
Nukes are mainly used as deterrent against Iran. Gaza is much too close from Israel for getting nuked.
Terrorists don't have rights, indeed. But the thing is, it's hard to distinguish civilians from terrorists in that kind of conflict.
>i've never heard of this publication
>better just, like, do the zoomed in screenshot
>to express my lack of faith in the publication
I think we can all agree any concept of a geneva convention or "rules of war" is a complete and utter farce at this point
when things start party rockin here in the states I have a feeling they'll show no restraint, even at the beginning
more and more the bell riots look like a blue print for what's to come
anon, Hamas hasn't signed or abided by the conventions...
Im thinking this is based. It is what they get for killing civilians.
this site makes up shit all the time but would be kino though
I never understood the big deal about chemical weapons to be tbh. Nukes I get, and biologicals I get because they could spread or mutate, but at the end of the day if chemicals weapons kill you you're just as dead as if you caught 5.56 with your dome.
I'm guessing with chemical weapons, there's issues with controlling the spread, similar to but not necessarily on the same scale as biological weapons. Plus at least 5.56 to the dome is more or less instant, and you don't spread your last moments vomiting out half of your internal organs.
This. Half the reason gas was restricted in WW2 was that a lot of the military leaders had been grunts in WW1 and did not remember the gas fondly. Some forces did end up gassing themselves too, although they were usually ready for it since they were using it in the first place.
>.556 to the dome
>Don't spend time vomiting out your organs
I mean, they don't always hit the head anon, there is still plenty of organ vomiting.
Chemical weapons aren’t terribly effective
But they are incredibly cruel to use
>biologicals I get because they could spread or mutate,
China killed tens of millions of people using bioweapons and got away with it, yet all the hypocrites say that chemicals should be banned. Weird, chemical weapons are not even that dangerous.
>chemical weapons are not even that dangerous
Compared to bioweapons (e.g. COVID-19) - yes, most chemical weapons are not dangerous. They don't kill millions of people or cause hundreds of millions to suffer the horrible consequences 3 years after contamination. They either kill you instantly or mutilate you for life, but they don't affect everyone who may contact you. And there are way more people who survived after being poisoned with, say Novichok, than there are those who didn't have severe symptoms after COVID-19.
>China
China wasn't funding that gain of function research with coronaviruses in Wuhan, USA was.
These weapons hurt people.
>never understood the big deal about chemical weapons
World War I is knocking, just in time for Halloween. You should search some images up and do some history & shit.
Iran-Iraq is far more disturbing to me, it's one of the most seriously fucked wars ever waged
This guy isnt a mustard gas survivor. He was a pilot who got in a crash and got burned by fuel. What you are seeing is the first attempts to do a graft. It got infected and he died.
>I never understood the big deal about chemical weapons to be tbh.
It's "poorfags" nuke.
See there is big boys nuke club. This club enjoys safety due to having weapons of mass destruction, see Russia and their threats "noooooks nooks nooks!" And entrance into this club is gatekeeped much while weapons themselves are legal.
Gatekeeping chemical weapons is much much more difficult. So these weapons can be seen as soft counter to the nuclear blackmail of Russians and US. So chemicals were banned and got "omg ebil!" status when nukes are not.
It's also because chemical weapons fucking suck lol
Iraq turned war with Irain around because of chemicals.
"Chemicals sucks" is nothing but propaganda by nuke boys club, trying to smear campaign against chemicals "they not just evil they also suck so let's ban them but nukes ok uwu".
US went against Iraq in 2003 because there were real concerns about possibility of chemicals SQUDs attacks against Israel and US simulation calculated that they had no counter and every missile could easily produce 10000 casualties if aimed at cities.
Because fighting in MOPP 4 sucks major ass in ideal conditions and is quasi-impossible if it's adverse at all.
Nobody wants to fucking deal with that so it's become something of a gentleman's agreement.
This of course doesn't mean CW use against a powerful nation won't happen.
But if it does, there will be a mighty shit wind blowing.
>You are overdue for your annual CBRNE briefing
I HATE THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS I HATE THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS I HATE THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS
youve never understood why polluting vast amounts of land with poisonous chemicals that will mutilate or kill the people and lands and waters there for decades is a big deal? would you like to drink some tap water from palestine, ohio to put your money where your mouth is homosexual?
There are different chemicals. Nerve agents dissolve in nature pretty quickly.
so you trust chinese to use nerve agents that dissolve in nature quickly? if only there was some sort of...international law or treaty that regulated these things so everyone would be on the same page
no they dont. some of them hang around for months
Free Palestine (Ohio)!
They're really unpleasant to defend against, but for the kind of big military powers who dictate which weapons are "allowed", there's no real need to use them. The same amount of conventional explosives will kill you just as dead as nerve gas.
It's kind of like how you can't use soft-point bullets. It's just more pleasant to deal with full metal jacket wounds, and there's no actual benefit to hurting an already wounded enemy more. No one with any clout has any reason to oppose the ban.
>Shoots an ICBM with a nerve agent at a city center
>sprays hundreds of thousands, killing them immediately
>gets into the water supply, and particle drift kills an extra hundred thousand and many more receiving permanent injury from exposure
>City is also permanently contaminated. A major center of commerce is effectively shut down
>”what’s the big deal?”
It’s a taboo because when you start to play with full-scale chemical warfare, it quickly resembles a neutron bomb in it’s toxicity and disturbing effects.
The few times nerve gas has actually been used, it wasn't anywhere near that effective. The Tokyo subway sarin attack in 1995 killed 13 people and severely injured 50. Those are rookie numbers.
They couldn’t manager dispersal right. No aerosol etc. if they would have they could have killed hundreds easily. They basically just left punctured bags of sarin there and if you touched them you died. One guy dumped his bag on the floor but again, that’s terrible dispersal
>The few times nerve gas has actually been used, it wasn't anywhere near that effective.
Iraq repeatedly used nerve agents to great effect in the Iran-Iraq war and that also stands as both their only confirmed wartime usage IIRC. Second, aside from the Tokyo attacks as far as I know the only times that nerve agents have ever intentionally been employed outside of the Iran-Iraq war is in assassinations like the Skirpal incident and Kim Jong-Un knocking off his sibling in Indonesia or wherever that was.
>The Tokyo subway sarin attack in 1995 killed 13 people and severely injured 50. Those are rookie numbers.
Yeah, rookie numbers for a rookie attempt. They had good lab equipment and financial backing but poor technical knowledge and their execution was absolute mickey mouse shit; in one of their attacks they literally just drove around a van with a heater and a tub of shoddy GB inside and fans blowing out the windows. If they had had better engineering and chemistry skills, a better plan for deployment and better methods of dispersal they could have manufactured hundreds of pounds of pure GB complete with the appropriate munitions and easily racked up a five-figure kill count. Imagine scores of properly constructed multi-kilo GB bombs on timers being stashed in high-traffic areas - it would have brought the entire country to its knees.
that's cos it was little bags of it on the floor pierced and allowed to leak. You need to get that stuff into a dispersed fog
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zone_rouge
multiple shellings, often all that was left was the husk of trees
Chemical weapons are for the denial of land. But not from the enemy, from humanity
Shit like this is proof that war is one of the peaks of human endeavor.
I always liked picrel
I mean, if you preemptively resign yourself to killing off a decent chunk of the hostages you're trying to rescue, you could do worse for tactics.
>we can save the hostages by using this uber sleeping gas
>everyone dies
Honestly based. It teaches the terrorists and the hostages the same lesson. No one is making it out. Which makes future terrorists question the idea of making demands and teaches civilians to fight to the last breath cause no one is saving them.
>Just gas everyone including your own women and children who were taken hostage
Brilliant! Why didn't we just do this during the Iran Hostage Crisis!?
>m-muh women and children
All life is valuable. Therefore, there is no meaningful difference between killing enemy fighters and killing civilians. The only thing that matters is the strategic effect it has on the war. If the women and children are in the way, it's as just to kill them as any other human. And if the goals of the war do not justify the deaths of a few hundred thousand innocent people, then the war itself is unjust, and the only moral action you could take is unconditional surrender.
Life has the value people choose to assign to it, and that definition is mutable but enforced through retaliatory violence. You aren't wrong entirely though- like I said, the value is mutable. For a more...insectile culture, such as the Chinese, they might quite literally eat their children, wives, and finally parents before killing adult men of reproductive age. The 'soldier ants' are priority.
>Which makes future terrorists question the idea of making demands
Doesn't work that way. They simply switched tactics. Instead of taking hostages and making demands they now blow up bombs in public places and make demands afterwards.
Boy do I have the counter-terror unit for you.
Was hearing about the hanible doctrine in idf some people are protesting about there families being killed cos of the doctrine israelites are calling these israelites traitors, I just dont understand these people they kill themselves and have no charity. These people are behaving exact opposite to israeli teachings.
Wut
Charity and forgiveness are Christian doctrines, not even kidding.
Truth
Apparently the gas they used was a fentanyl derivative. Small world.
>falling asleep while on the job
young people nowadays just can't do anything right
ah yes, Middle East Eye, a beacon of truth
>middleeasteye
i honestly can't believe anyone fell for this, much as i'd like it to happen
This is the stupidest trolltastic shit I've seen in weeks, and that's saying something. Holy shit.
Imagine if the headline read:
>Exclusive: Iran will flood Israel with nerve gas under Chinese navy supervision
Would there be an outcry?
What would they say at the Hague?
We will see the first hanging of the US president at The Hague
that's not very likely at all
unless like, india pakistan war
just saying
>nooo you can't heckin warcrime
>Palestinian resistance groups expect Israel to flood Hamas tunnels with nerve gas and chemical weapons under the surveillance of US Delta Force commandos as part of a surprise attack on the Gaza Strip, a senior Arab source familiar with the groups told Middle East Eye.
>Palestinian resistance groups expect
lol no proof
Kek did they mention how many Boris Johnsons will be deployed? That will be the real game changer.
>Delta Force
>US Navy
Fuckers can’t even be bothered to look up which special forces are from which branch, just mash together whatever terms they heard in the latest Steven Segal movie.
Besides the US has zero offensive chemical warfare experience why the fuck would they be contributing to this? This is “hello sir this is IRS calling sir you must pay late fees in Best Buy gift cards now sir” tier bullshit.
God I hope Hamas gases itself in a retarded attempt at false flagging
>It’s only okay if my side breaks all the rules
Why are mutts like this?
The gassed become the gassers
It's not nerve gas, just common pesticide.
Besides, what are they gonna do with roughly 6 million dead Hamas fighters?
Those bodies aren't gonna just dispose of themselves.
Man, how is this a good look for the USA?
Helping the strongest Middle Eastern army curbstomp some fucking residential neighbourhood that has some militiamen in it?
They did really need 3 carrier battlegroups?
>They did really need 3 carrier battlegroups?
They're not there for Gaza, they're there for Iran and its proxies when they throw their inevitable geopolitical shitfit over Israel attempting to turn Gaza into Mosul.
Iran is on the other side of the Middle East. It can't do anything without crossing Iraq or Turkey.
>They're not there for Gaza, they're there for Iran and its proxies when they throw their inevitable geopolitical shitfit over Israel attempting to turn Gaza into Mosul.
Turkey is also throwing a fit and calling Hamas the resistance
It's fake you moron
>no one at this has figured out that it's not real
this board is so fucked man
It's almost certainly not real considering how PR-sensitive the present administration is in the US and this will go down about as well as bombing Gaza with WP again. It'd unironically be one of the least bad solutions to the tunnel warfare problem if a sufficiently nonlethal agent was chosen.
>and this will go down about as well as bombing Gaza with WP again
So...no one will give a shit? Because no one cared about the willy pete.
stop taking PrepHole so seriously you retard
>all these anons talking about using big boy countries with chemical weapon stockpiles
>they don’t realize America has transitioned its chemical corps to a strictly defensive/cleanup force who gets their reps in assisting with civilian chemical accidents because modern chemical weapons are even more lethal than nuclear
In a chemical first strike scenario with nerve gas the target is dead as fuck with zero hope of surviving
>t. CBRN guy
>I don't want to hear another fucking word about the Holocaust EVER again
Then dont plan on watching a movie or any tv news show ever again.
Thats all they say when talking about Israel. You would think every week theres a holocaust
blue check mark, it's true, gotta be
Israel's F-15 camo looks so good I'm willing to forgive a WMD incident or two.
>flooding tunnels with deadly neurotoxins
This is utter horseshit and fake news. Look up Dan K on Twitter. He's quite well versed on nerve agents
Nerve gas? That's too complicated m
Just use exhaust fumes, ya dingus. It is cheap and proven.
Shoot I was hoping for ironic nerve gas videos
>No uniform
>Hide amongst the civilians
>Mass casualty strikes against civilians
Nerve gas is better than these "people" deserve.
Want to be treated with respect?
Put on a uniform, get non-combatants out of your camps, and fight like a real military.
okay homosexual go airstrike some kids like a real "man" israelite
>launch surprise attack (good) against your enemy (great) using commando forces (brilliant)
>overrun enemy military bases (amazing) capture enemy equipment including tanks (wow) even capture enemy soldiers (10/10)
>use the next 6 hours of mayhem to kill literal civilians, ignoring almost all genuine military objectives
>use priceless forces and munitions to gun down a bunch of foreigners at a rave in the desert
>go door to door killing old ladies
>cry foul when you get bombed for the next month
Hamas was never going to just get away with a surprise attack but Christ it's like they tried to pick the absolute worst option available.
The vast majority of Westerners, support Palestine and are celebrating the Hamas attacks
No we don't. France already banned Pro-Palestine gatherings, any attempted ones in Eastern Europe got ganked by local gypsies and the rest of the West is on the way.
Every last motherfucker that signed the open letter supporting Hamas will lose their job.
its almost like you have never learned the concept of a false flag event
Are you saying the israelites carried out the raid? Which Hamas took credit for? And published videos of on all its telegram channels? That makes no sense anon I’m sorry
almost like it makes no sense that roosvelt knew about the raid on pearl harbor before it happened but let it go forth anyway to give him his desired pretext to join the war with england?
or how it makes no sense that the CIA and FBI were paying the 9/11 hijackers and following them closely yet somehow managed to allow the attacks to happen then publish the videos all over CIA propganda (CNN) 24/7 to justify invasion of iraq? are you saying america really was really attacked in the gulf of tonkin by imaginary NVA forces, and published the results of the fake attack on imaginary forces all over the israelite york times and every tv and newspaper station in the country to justify war in vietnam? that makes no sense anon im sorry. why would they lie? why would an FBI agent put on a MAGA hat and shout at everyone to enter the capital that makes no sense im sorry.
That’s not a false flag though. I thought when you said false flag you meant an actual false flag operation. No need to get flustered
do you have any evidence that proves mossad was not involved in directing the hamas attacks?
Are you saying Hamas is mossad’s puppet? Why didn’t you just say that before it’s such a simple claim.
And no. I don’t believe that’s true. It doesn’t make much sense to me.
its hard to accept that people this retarded exist but then i remember most people here are tiktok zoomers who grew up since birth playing iphone games instead of reading or learning how to think for themselves in school
Fuck off anon not everything is 50D chess
I just don’t think israel planned this attack out, anon. It makes no sense to me. I accept claims like “Israel created Hamas” etc but I don’t think it was a false flag attack. I think it’s the same thing as Britain being responsible for the ira existing but they had no clue about the incoming bombings
because they need pretext to invade and remove gaza from their territory retard
Are you saying the israelites did the raid on Israel? I’m just trying to understand what your reasoning is. You’re saying something very odd that even Hamas doesn’t claim
>that even Hamas doesn’t claim
have you ever heard of the term "useful idiot"? its someone who you trick into doing your bidding because they are disposable, and can take all the blame. the best manipulation is the one where the useful idiot thinks its his own idea and hes working on his own agenda. why dont you google the creation of hamas and its origins, you have some light reading to do tonight which might surprise you
Not him but imagine you're this ethnically homogenous country surrounded by hostile nations. And in the center left of your country is a city full of a hostile group of people which number almost 1/5th of your whole nations population. So it's a lot of people who pose a significant security and stability problem for your country, especially if they got loose from their makeshift prison city walls. Ok, now imagine you get a lot of free money from gullible retards all over the world. Now if you decided one day you had enough of this security risk, you were just going to invade and send millions of these hostile people out of your land and inflame all the hostile nations surrounding you. The resulting humanitarian issues would also harm the goodwill of your financial benefactors around the world. Would it be easier to do this, if you could justify it as self defense? Perhaps if these prison city people attacked you first?
That’s all fine and I agree but I just don’t believe Hamas is controlled by mossad. I think the Israelis were genuinely caught by surprise on October 7th
>ethnically homogenous country
Israel isn't an ethnically homogeneous. I know American education is not fantastic, but at least read a wikipedia page on a country before starting typing whole paragraphs on it.
How do the Palestinefags reconcile the fact 20% of Israeli is Arab and fucking hates the Palestinians?
what % is israeli? 30%? 40%?
Israel is about 70% israeli, but there are a number of different israeli ethnic groups. Basically it ranges from white, brown, browner, black. White israelites are more or less in the minority, making up something like less than 40% of the israeli population, and most at this point are mixed race, except new arrivals from NA.
>Terrorists hide behind children
oof, bad choice, now there are collaterals.
I'm confused, is airstriking kids supposed to be less humane then gunning them down in front of their parents?
Immensely based UNTIL they search the casualties and find a bunch of hostages, including unaccounted US ones. Then it turns into a huge cover up.
I guess techically water is a nerve gas if you really stretch the definition really far.
Enough of it and it shuts down the nerves due to lack of eletrolytes.
>Water intoxication, also known as water poisoning, hyperhydration, overhydration, or water toxemia, is a potentially fatal disturbance in brain functions that results when the normal balance of electrolytes in the body is pushed outside safe limits by excessive water intake.
Well that or drowning.
isn't using chemical weapon some kind of evil shit the usa always says is bad?
This Middle East Eye account is a blatant Iranian funded propaganda account. If you look at their tweets (which are all inaccessible unless you have a twitter account thanks Musk why are twitter screenshot posts not an auto-ban) it's just shit about Israel oppressing poor Gaza, Gaza having no electricity, everyone hates Israel, death toll this, fucking Roblox users staging a rally that.
There's a bunch of these accounts and they all popped up after Musk changed the verification system and added monetization. One notable user discovered the concept of forward deployment of USAF bombers at RAF Fairford and acted like the US was 20 minutes away from glassing Iran (with B-1Bs which can't carry nukes) and just ignored anyone telling him he was wrong. He did it because he got 2 million impressions and corresponding ad revenue.
What I'm trying to say is that it doesn't matter if Israel has chemical weapons, or how the US would respond to their use in Gaza or Syria or Iran. They're not going to be used and OP's screenshot is a blatant lie.
ISreal has done false flag attacks in the past is it really a good idea for israel to have chemical or nuclear weapons?
Not up for you or me to decide, they're a sovereign nation.
So have America and Russia. More importantly, what the fuck are you gonna do about it
>This Middle East Eye account is a blatant Iranian funded propaganda account.
MEE looks like a joint Qatari and Turkish jam and they back Hamas.
>There's a bunch of these accounts and they all popped up after Musk changed the verification system and added monetization.
Right. People now buy verification and then have incentives to post B.S. that will go viral as a way of making money but it wrecked Twitter as a useful source of information.
>Source: An inbred moron interpreted a hadith
GAS
GAS
GAS
My fucking sides
Why even use gas? Just flood the tunnels using actual water.
It's not true but I wish it was
It's kinda poetic isnt it theres always that joke or s history of how israelites get gassed now the gassing is on the other foot and israelites will be the ones gassing people it's just so strange we are going full circle
In 40 years time will we be talking about how all of this is fake and some one will try to say how it's real and shit
I mean at least it is technically feasable to gas muds in tunnels. The holohoax stuff just isn't physically possible to achieve.
True true
No way that's happening, it has too much of a chance of everything going into hell
Why not send in drones ?
I wish but that would be retarded as it could poison Israel’s water supply
R.I.P. in piece hostages.
That's not very nice.
>Middle East Eye
A few years ago, these guys were claiming that Israel had opened a dam to flood Gaza.
That dam did not exist.
Guess I have to crack out this baby
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=_pgZEUW8pGc&si=GUGVf-vWExmAJd1O
It's not because of DA JOOOOOOOOOOOOS that you can't get laid, *KEK*
NTA but there is a ton of reasons to hate/dislike/criticize Israel and its influence on the world stage without being a Nazi, Sheepshagger, or Commie.
>hostages are in the tunnels
You all get to see israelites gassed for the first time in history
Ah yes, because we all know Saddam Hussein is the paragon of military genius
no it won't
t. IDF's combat engineering corps
If Israel gassed Gaza/West Bank they'd be Myanmar/Apartheid South Africa/North Korea tier on the world stage. Nobody would want anything to do with them. Nobody even in Israel is that retarded.
TLDR: OP is retarded
I've been consuming nothing but eggs and booze for the past 12 hours. The gas can't be deadlier than this
Chemical weapons are on the same tier as landmines, a temporary benefit that turns into a longterm problem that kills a shitload more people than the ones you're fighting.
I bet for some reason Hamas are now put children and women in those tunnels.
how is this legal? and how is this a good precedent to set? this will basically give the greenlight to russians, chinks, and literally every other nation to use chemical weapons at will and we will have no moral authority to intervene or complain
>Precedent
Saddam got away with it and to a lesser extent Assad
I would like to remind you that these are not some wild caves, but a gigantic network of man-made mine workings with ventilation. While the ventilation system is working, it will be difficult to fill these tunnels with gas.
Or rather, its not even difficult, but technically impossible.
>retards still believing this article from the "middle east eye"
>source is palestinian resistance groups
A DEADLY MIST
My source is that I made it the fuck up
Many retards will cry warcrimes about this but thing is, war crimes do not apply to terrorists
The nerve of some people amirite
Seriously though this is written like the source is just a bad dream someone had lmao
Pic related guarantees my right to own high-quality military-grade nerve gas in whatever quantities I care to stockpile.
Friendly reminder that all weapons are horrific, and the only reason that nerve gas is banned is because it's simply way too overpowered in the meta, but there's no known way to both cheaply & effectively mitigate or "nerf" it.
>goes everywhere but tends to "stack" to about double man-height above the battlefield, enveloping everything between the vapordeck and the dirt
>simple gas masks are not enough; you need head-to-toe airtight protective garments, and your spine bends backwards into a U-shape as you die in agony if you so much as cut open your suit and get some nerve gas directly onto your exposed skin, or even if it seeps through your fabric garment layers
>totally denies a given area to any human who isn't inside of a sealed environment with its own atmosphere supply or superb filtration
>kills campers in call of duty: warzone
>cheap & plentiful
>half life of minutes or hours; it's mostly gone after a single windy day, and a few of days worth of rain or sunshine is enough to make 99.999999% of the nerve gas chemically react ("burn up") leaving innert molecular residue (and probably lots of dead bugs), so there's no specter of long-term fallout
>great for booby-traps
>outstanding for urban & subterranean combat
>_<
>using nerve gas is literally fumigating for anthropoids instead of arthropods
The US did this in Vietnam. War crimes are allowed if we or israelites do it.
Why the fuck is this shitty thread still up?
tell the jannies it's not about ukraine, that'll shut the shit down real fast.
Chemical weapons scare me far more than nukes.
?si=iIznXlkadD-LdOvp
what would an ironic nerve gas death video be? since you keep using the word "unironic"
Piss off, dune coon. Stop regurgitating Jihadi propaganda here and go find a child-bride to marry, a goat to fuck or whatever it is that you towel-heads do for fun.
I’m hearing about air strikes in Syria on tv rn
NERV
oh boy, i hope they bought some of that russian vx, it'd be dope to see some footage of that.
and kill all hostages? or are they all dead now?
NAVY BRO.
NAVY.
BROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
NAVY?
nayv.
navy bruh.
navy.
I actually don't know how to feel about this?
NAVY is like, a, very mellow branch in my understanding
nerve gas is very very so scary.
I think I read up on or saw nerve gas death stories?
in RTC lectures?
people get turn into twisted beef jerky?
bone torned up muscle cramped up
the way chief described it, very scary.
chief said if someone throw one of those nerve gas bomb on our ship let people know, it can undetectably kill the whole ship
I think chief mean while I'm dying do make radio calls so people can close the gate?
cause IDK if I rememer it right? maybe people said use moist water towel? thats..... like...I'm.... not... going to..... survive.... this?
Take too long to get to gas mask.
very scary. horrible images, cause it could legitimately happen to me. that's why it's scary.
Duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude
We got tear gasssssed in the navy
That's a type of nerve gas right?
Hurts way less than OC sabre pepper spray
I'll rate it an 4 to 5/10 pain
pretty decently painful
nice try, NAVY
Anyway we all cried so much that day? IDK, patty offucer laughed off of our misery, so not nice?
The thing I find disturbing about calls for a ceasefire is that none of the people who are calling for it are saying Hamas should hand hostages back. Not one. I haven't heard a single politician/important figure who whines about the plight of Ham...Gaza say about what should be given for a ceasefire given that Hamas constantly breaks them.
They also don't criticise Egypt and Jordon for equally besieging Gaza.
The absolute state of post-Russian Invasion /k/. How the fuck did a thread this shit based on completely made up bullshit from a anonymous twitter screencap create a 325 post thread with 170 people? This fucking board will be as bad as PrepHole and PrepHole in 12 months.