Let's say with needle-firing drones or something we could deliver a cocktail of STDs to enemy soldiers easily. What would be the pozitives and negatives?
>Terrifying/demoralizing
>Momentarily puts enemy out of action without killing, mostly treatable, therefore more humane
>Will not do much damage to civilians
Try turbing your brain on when you wake up in the morning OP
My brain and more is turned on, thank you
I don't know, which ones would you suggest? This is just an idea I'm putting out there
Which kind of STDs? A shit load of STDs die when they are exposed to the air
The "labs" in San Francisco had been working on constructing the perfect pozzed AIDS-twink but unfortunately modern medicine has rendered the program useless as a weapon
>Terrifying
>Momentarily puts enemy out of action
How so? It would likely take weeks before anyone showed symptoms, assuming they did at all.
Even if it takes types for actual physical symptoms, psychologically it will be be good enough for a start
congrats, you've pissed them off, now they're gonna dedicate their short existence only to killing you
you're a fucking dumbass, go do your homework before your father beats you again
>army gives PREP to every soldier potentially exposed
>regiment/battalion commanders order every soldier to take a grenade and kill at least one enemy soldier
>they state that due to the complexities of war there will be no requirement for photos proving you killed actual soldiers
>psychologically it will be be good enough for a start
How? It's not like people know anything will have happened until they show symptoms. And various rashes aren't exactly unusual in field conditions. It's not like this is a video game where some special colored icon lights up to let you know that you have the crotch-itch debuff.
>soldier gets hit with HIV
>completely fine for a year before getting AIDS
not sure how this helps
Anon if you're weaponizing disease there's no reason to specify sexually transmitted. Many of them are pathetic outside of their intended tissues.
If you want to really really fuck the whole world over forever you would shoot people in the gut with MRSA or ESBL klebsiella or something
t. knower
>ESBL klebsiella
thanks, new fear unlocked
Can you shine a light on the shit we're gonna see in the future with stuff? Any apocalyptical scenario's?
Pan-resistant pseudomonas is the boogieman of the hospital. MRSA is everywhere. ESBL isn't uncommon anymore either.
Beyond that I don't know. Another crazy viral outbreak probably. Who knows what could happen those little retards change so quick.
>start intentionally infecting mobiks with HIV
>HIV incidence only goes up a small percentage
my sides, because it is true
The Tick already did it.
STDs aren't that great at quickly incapacitating someone and they're not great at spreading between soldiers in action unless you're combining this with the gay bomb.
Just pull the omega variant out of the biolab and give 'em the coof.
You're a genius, anon. Yeah, let's weaponize something that is 99% curable and/or manageable.
Aerosolized HIV though
HIV is super manageable now. Mortality hardly different from the regular population of they're on the right drugs, which are free in the US
>Aerosolized
Hold up there hitler there's no reason to put it in a fucking spray can you psychopathic munt.
>Aerosolized HIV though
Homie you are one fucked upped kid, at least your not fucking around with Prions
>weaponize one of the most feared STI/blood-transmitted diseases on the planet
>make it transmissible by literal air-currents
>global community says "Country X has made human extinction viable in their campaign of blah blah who cares nuke these cunts before the 80s freakout delusions become real"
>whole planet has a cassus belli to drop a cobalt-salted nuke on your capitol and glass your entire population
>absolutely zero popular support for your country from any normies
gg shitforbrains
Initial infection for most STI’s are the most severe with flu like symptoms and genital pain. After that it’s either a recursive experience or a delayed death. Sex is best suited to get intel from officers from regimented army.
You're approaching biological warfare in the most asinine way possible. STDs aren't incapacitating, most require fluid transfer or contact to spread and may take months to fully develop into a life threatening condition only if left fully untreated.
Anthrax would be more suitable. Or against a particularly backwards enemy, a strain of influenza.
Why do that when you can just pre-emptively turn the population gay through years of media programming?
HAHAHAHA OH WAIT
My semen is already weaponized with a functioning delivery system.
>t anon in Cali wali
Truly the dumbest thread I've seen in a while
>Weaponizing STDs
Isn't this just Russia?
Why an STD anyway? A cocktail of chemicals designed to cause extreme deleria, drowsiness and fatigue would be far more effective. Or, a toxin that would cause debilitating pain to the victim withou any long term effects to the physique perhaps?
Why not just have those drones carry a gun or a bomb. You’d just kill them then and there.
Already been done, it's called a variety of names: Tinder, Bumble, Grindr, and so on.
Bum>
I'm pretty sure the Navy already has STDs
Goddamn it Matthew, I told you yesterday in the lab that no one would support flying attack dildoes, so there's no point in wasting time developing them.
Don't you come here and start pitching your idea so you can say to the board that there's "legitimate public interest in the idea".