Wait a minute, does Russia really not have any other advanced warning systems? What about satellites?

Wait a minute, does Russia really not have any other advanced warning systems? What about satellites?

I find it hard to believe someone could launch a full nuclear strike at Russia and they'd be completely unaware until mushroom clouds stay appearing

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous
        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/oQ3QCy0.jpg

          https://i.imgur.com/Rnaxcgt.jpg

          https://i.imgur.com/zSlJVWE.jpg

          Wait a minute, does Russia really not have any other advanced warning systems? What about satellites?

          I find it hard to believe someone could launch a full nuclear strike at Russia and they'd be completely unaware until mushroom clouds stay appearing

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        > a window of opportunity to hit Russian territory without retaliation

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          The Administration couldn't pull off an attack without blabbing about it to the press, so Russia doesn't really *need* an early warning system.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's moot anyway because everything nuclear Russia designs is fail-deadly. If the system fails they noook.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Afk sistema owner on his 250 mil boat somewhere mid Pacific right now

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wouldn't be suprised at this point if the US had the same damn problem. Regardless, Russia does have ICBM equipped subs. Wouldn't take them long to figure out what's going on.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Also you nuke a few cities it'll be nuclear winter for a year or two over the northern hemisphere, not to mention all the carinogenic as frick dusk and shit that would kick up. So no partytime kids.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >nuclear winter
        quit with the memes

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Shut the frick up already, moron.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            They let you shitpost in hell, carl sagen?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's real m8, the smoke from burning cities enters the atmosphere blocking sunlight. Even big volcanoes have dropped the global temp a few degrees for long periods of time, this would be on a completely different scale.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Even big volcanoes have dropped the global temp a few degrees for long periods of time
            You said everything needed to be said with "long periods of time". To try and emulate the same thing as a big volcano with nukes the US would have to basically turn every big city in russia into dust with the biggest nukes they have.
            Nuclear winter is a meme in the sense that for it to happen mankind would need to detonate pretty much every nuke they have all over the planet.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Yes that was the idea behind WWIII congratulations of finally figuring it out

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Actually it would take only a limited exchange of around 20 nukes to drastically impact the world climate and crash the world food production killing approx. 25-50% of the world population. The areas closest to the equator would be hardest hit

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Dumb moron.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        The US nuked its own territory a almost hundred times in 1962 and nothing happened.
        Nuclear winter is a dubious claim at best.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >less than 100 explosions in a year vs around 15 000 explosions in a day

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >few cities
            >15k explosions
            You don't really need 3k nukes to level a city, you know?

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Considering russian accuracy, you might actually need that many assuming that they even work in the begin with

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            there aren't even that many nukes in the world any more moron, let alone that many viable targets, and they're sure as hell not evenly distributed across the globe at sea level, with compulsory ground bursts. Nuclear winter is a myth.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Nuclear winter was a hypothesis in the 90s that has since been disproved by better data. Same with the "radioactive death clouds" hypothesis but that was more of a fad in the 70s and 80s.

        Nuclear war would be extremely unpleasant but all current science suggests that billions of people would survive and society would be on its way back to normal within 10 years.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          That's a lie, people were already complaining about WW2 being too much to handle for the civilian population. Populations were wholely opposed to war in the 1980s and if it wasn't for the "Putin is the new Hitler" narrative they'd be against what's happening in Ukraine as well.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >muh poor pooteen

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              It's more about blindly believing propaganda, something you might be personally experiencing...

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >glaslighting vatBlack person talks about propaganda
                always projection with you shills

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                I think hes false-flagging

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >glaslighting vatBlack person talks about propaganda
                always projection with you shills

                you two are insane. seriously so far up your own asses thinking youre well informed and all you are is useful idiots. legit unhinged

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous
            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              It's funny listen to Russia mention cancel culture when their state will do the same and send you to a prison for wrongthink.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Fun fact: russia also invented "hate speech" many decades ago. It's been standard russian law longer than the idea has existed in the west. Protected groups also include: police, military, politicians(not even joking) and spiritual workers.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            People are against the war in Ukraine, everyone would be happy if Russia just fricks off

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Nuclear winter was a hypothesis in the 90s
          80s. It was pushed by Carl Sagan.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Nuclear winter was a hypothesis in the 90s

          >Nuclear winter was a hypothesis in the 90s
          80s. It was pushed by Carl Sagan.

          >80s. It was pushed by Carl Sagan.
          (You) know-nothing moron Black folk. Get the God-damned frick out of here. You've grown up with the entire Internet at your command and (You) don't even know some of the most basic shit that's been going on for almost an entire century.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            cry about it you gutless cowardly sensationalist b***h

            it was never real and will never be real. it's entirely made-up soviet propaganda to discourage nuclear development in free countries by exploiting useful idiots like you. have a nice day, vermin.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Truely, (You) are one of the Dunningest of Krugers.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Nuclear Winter was conceived and developed 100% by western scientists before it became part of public discussion and that's a fact unlike the revisionist propaganda later.
              Soviets shilling it for their own propaganda purposes doesn't mean there wasn't a real scientific debate about it, you moronic reaganite.
              Also Carl Sagan was explicitly in favour of nuclear power plants and engines for spaceships unlike most ecologists.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >there wasn't a real scientific debate about it
                Which there wasn't because of the fundamental assumptions it required. Like cities being the bulk of targets, rather than byproducts, or single warheads assigned to targets. All which had zero basis on how they're used. Climate scientists are not nuclear strategists.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                In addition, as OPpie once pointed out, it took Hiroshima and Nagasaki as a baseline, divided the estimated particulates released by the kilotonnage, and then straight-line extrapolated that against the megatonnage of all nukes in existence. That's pretty stupid and/or blatantly dishonest by itself (for starters, there's the square-cube rule), but it gets even worse. Japanese cities are largely wood with rice-paper walls, and most homes contained a pot-bellied stove for cooking (and heating in the winter). The explosion flattened a lot of homes at a fairly long range for the kilotonnage... right on top of their stoves. The result was smoldering fires that lasted for days, pumping out far more particulates per kiloton than just about any other kind of city.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous
          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            On the Beach wasn't about nuclear winter, it was about a magic radiation cloud that covered the whole planet and killed everybody, violating multiple laws of physics in the process.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >it'll be nuclear winter for a year or two over the northern hemisphere
        also be careful you don't set the entire atmosphere on fire with those H bombs

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >he doesn't know every modern nuke's a kt range airburster
        >he doesn't know the 7-10 rule
        >he doesn't know ALARA
        it's 2023 homie, there's no excuse for you to be this moronic.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >The 7-10 rule
          >ALARA
          NTA, but what DO those terms mean?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            7-10 rule is the rule of radiation decay, basically for every sevenfold increase in passed time the radiation falls tenfold so in the end it's going to be safe to go outside 2 weeks after the blast everywhere except for the most irradiated places like ground zero and large concentrations of fallout, with very little adverse health effects as long as you don't breathe the stuff and don't spend too much time outside. 3 months after the blast it's basically over. That's why 2 weeks is usually the recommended length of supplies for prepping.

            ALARA is some bong legalese term, idk how it relates to the topic.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              ALARA = As Low As Reasonably Achievable, this is a statement that's used when there no true "safe level" of a pollutant or environmental hazard such as radiation so the goal is to reduce as much as possible.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                its alarp. as low as reasonably practibale. it is used in safety cases. the idea being we cant eliminate all risks. its not practical. so we accept as small risk as possible.

                never heard of 7 10 rule. inverse square law i have. get away from a source you get less dose

                contamination is a different beast. it doesnt go anywhere fast. radiation is easy to deal with. contamination really isnt.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Crazy how 500 odd atmospheric nuclear tests didn't affect the climate at all, must only work if you're at war

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Dumb frick troll. No one ever claimed atmospheric tests would affect climate. It dies, however, add vast amounts of radionuclides and isotopes into the atmosphere. The amounts are still coming down even after 50 years of test bans. Seriously, Chunky, they taught us that in grade 10 science class. Quit huffing the bunsen burner gas and pay attention in class. And fricking grow up. Holy christ act your age.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >spread over 40 years
            >dust blown into the high atmosphere takes 18 months to drop
            totally the same as a full counterforce exchange in hours

            That doesn't change that nuclear winter is a spook. Even a recent reanalysis of the original papers that the whole idea was based on came to the same conclusion.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >spread over 40 years
          >dust blown into the high atmosphere takes 18 months to drop
          totally the same as a full counterforce exchange in hours

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Nuclear winter isn't actually caused by the bombs themselves, it'f from all the shit burning from the devastating of civilization being nuked. There is some real shit about this, a big enough volcanic eruption chucks enough smoke into the atmosphere that global temperature does down down a few degrees for a couple years
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volcanic_winter
          but nothing humans have done have replicated that kind of ash output. So to reiterate, you're correct, but it's because we weren't using those bombs on cities or heavily forested areas

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Also you nuke a few cities it'll be nuclear winter for a year or two over the northern hemisphere, not to mention all the carinogenic as frick dusk and shit that would kick up. So no partytime kids.

      >reverse cargo cult yet again

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Most of the Russian missile subs have to sit in port because they can't afford to go to sea all the time andor because the crew is scared of another Kursk.

      Of the ones at sea they're shadowed by American Hunter Killer Subs

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Hell the US can probably afford to task two SSNs per Russian boomer.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          LOL, bruh, US has 50 SSNs while russia has 12, with half of those being ancient soviet vintage. They also deploy like 2 at a time while the rest sit in port. Russian subs are a big meme.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      NOOOKS
      NOOOOOOOOKS
      RUSSIA HAS NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOKSSSSSSSSS

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Do they, though?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Some are probably still working

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Russia sucks means everyone has to suck as well

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's the final butwhatabout. The last cope.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Too bad that most of Russia's boomer fleet are located in the Kola peninsula. With Finland now joining NATO, the security of not only Russia's boomer sub pens but also one of the few airfields that operate their nuclear capable bombers are now in serious question. If war were to breakout between NATO and Russia they will lose a large part of their nuclear triad within a week with no real way of stopping it. There is only 1 road and railroad track for Russia to move forces to the Kola peninsula and it follows most of the Finnish border

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >within a week
        Lol, you're being too nice.
        There's only one road leading to Murmansk in the entire peninsula, and it's 100 km from the border.
        You could rush it in a day. The peninsula is mostly undefended, because the border is very long, there's barely any infrastructure and it's practically just swamps.
        Maybe you won't take Murmansk that easily, because it will be defended, but you can just lay siege and disable whatever is garrisoned there.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Ya no, in the US we get what we pay for, we just pay ten times what we should. Basically. If thing in Russia costs a dollar you get ten cents worth of it. In the US you pay ten dollars and get a dollars worth of stuff. The end result is the Mic fricks everyone but the US has a functioning military.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >but but whatabout

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Wouldn't be suprised at this point if the US had the same damn problem

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Is this the new ultimate Vatnik cope?
      >YEAH RUSSIA IS BAD BUT I THINK AMERICA PROBABLY IS ALSO AS LE BAD AS RUSSIA CHECKMATE!

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        They have been doing it for a while. Made up equivalence is the closest they get to saying they have a problem.

        >Yeah as a Russian I drink and beat my wife and kids and molest the dog but so does my neighbor so it's okay AND we have tigers!

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        New? Literally the standard line of deflection in the USSR for their human rights abuses was "and yet you lynch Black folks", as if they unironically think 2 wrongs cancel each other out

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Wouldn't be surprised if you're a vatnik at this point. You should go see a doctor

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Wouldn't be suprised at this point if the US had the same damn problem.
      >"I-If ours is dogshit then America's MUST be shit, too!"
      Reminder that the US annually spends more money on maintaining our nuclear triad than the Russian Federation spends on their entire defense budget.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      No. The US's shit is also all horrifically overpriced shit that rapes taxpayers, but it is still actually the correct parts. The government knowingly overpays so long as they don't do this shit.

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    nothin' new.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      How the frick did he land in front of the Kremlin without running someone over?hwpvh

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >BLYAT
        >IS THAT PLANE?
        >I SHOULD NOT BE OF STANDING IN THE ROAD!

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Because he landed on a nearby bridge that just so happened to have the power lines for trains taken down that morning for maintenance then from there I am guessing he taxxied the plane over to the square. If you read into the incident its so coincidential and crazy you would almost think it was made up. Just search Matthias Rust and his wiki page will come up.

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    nothin' new.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's telling that this dude already didn't trust his own detection systems in 1983, when the SU was supposedly still at his peak.
      He knew.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >He knew.
        Everyone who was not braindead knew.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        It seemed multiple people in his department didn’t trust the system, since there were other incidents besides his own.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/qCxGaCy.jpg

        nothin' new.

        >a single Russian's heroic actions saved the entire world from sure annihilation
        >many such cases
        it's all bs isn't it

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          It is Russia so it is probably all lies as part of some stupid psyop.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          it's likely he didn't have clearance to start the launch either way, regardless of his decision

          still a good move on his part tbh

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >it's likely he didn't have clearance to start the launch either way, regardless of his decision

            I don't think it's ever been claimed that he did, but he could definitely escalate if he'd taken the launch detection seriously, that's what happened decades later with Yeltsin and he told them to frick off and went back to his vodka

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          They didn't award him for it and tried to sweep it underneath the rug. Likely a case where it was true given how it made the USSR lose face as a nation.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's telling that this dude already didn't trust his own detection systems in 1983, when the SU was supposedly still at his peak.
      He knew.

      >a new, novel system has odd kinks that need to be ironed out
      Wow, color me surprised.
      >a formerly functional, but now old, rotting system doesn't fully work after three decades of societal meltdown and looting by oligarchs and cronies, making it a patchwork of ersatz and "good enough"
      Wow, color me surprised. But use a different color, please.

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    we have telegram comrad just send a message about the nuke explosion and we will retaliate quickly

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Did you read what you posted? It's saying that the radar system is unreliable, it isn't saying it doesn't exist and it isn't saying there are no other early warning systems (albeit the current special military operation suggests Russia has unreliable sat systems at best across the board)

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    bring back the russian woodpecker

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Isn't that in Ukraine?

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is very interesting, and it immediatly reminded me of this:

    "In January 1997 Defense Minister Igor Rodionov wrote an alarming letter to Yeltsin. He said the command-and-control systems for Russia's nuclear forces--including the deep underground bunkers and the early-warning system--were falling apart. "No one today can guarantee the reliability of our control systems," Rodionov said. "Russia might soon reach the threshold beyond which its rockets and nuclear systems cannot be controlled."
    As of the late 1990s the command system and communications networks support nuclear operations, including launch on warning, were typically five or more years past due for overhaul and modernization, with some components ten or more years past their design life. The nuclear suitcases that receive early warning information and accompany the President, Defense Minister, and Chief of the General Staff, were falling into disrepair. Periodically the central command system would go into a "loss of regime" mode, which is a neutral position where it could not send out commands. There were also a few incidents in which individual missile silos or regiments would report to the center that they were in "combat mode" -- but the main system could prevent any accidental launch. Russian officials have repeatedly denied that the strategic forces command system is weakening. They say it has rigid controls against an accidental launch."

    The Russian nuclear forces are probably only a shadow of their former selves.

    >inb4 "hurr durr but they regularly do ICBM tests"
    Missile tests do not prove anything. During these tests, the missiles are controlled locally, it does not involve the EWS or the entire chain of the Russian nuclear forces, only the very bottom of the command and control chain, the guys who input the flight path and launch the missile.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Cont'd

      "Russia’s Strategic Missile Forces will use a new-generation automated command and control system from 2016, the Defense Ministry said 19 September 2013. The new system, based on the digital transmission of operations orders bypassing intermediary levels straight to the launch pad, allows the prompt targeting and retargeting of missiles and ensures the effective command and control of all units and subunits, Defense Ministry spokesman Dmitry Andreyev said. The fifth-generation system will use wire, radio and satellite communication channels that are well protected from jamming and other forms of interference, he added. The system is compact and reliable and boasts low energy consumption, secure information transmission and imperviousness to external impacts, the spokesman said."

      Safe to say they likely fricked this modernization up.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Cont'd

      "Russia’s Strategic Missile Forces will use a new-generation automated command and control system from 2016, the Defense Ministry said 19 September 2013. The new system, based on the digital transmission of operations orders bypassing intermediary levels straight to the launch pad, allows the prompt targeting and retargeting of missiles and ensures the effective command and control of all units and subunits, Defense Ministry spokesman Dmitry Andreyev said. The fifth-generation system will use wire, radio and satellite communication channels that are well protected from jamming and other forms of interference, he added. The system is compact and reliable and boasts low energy consumption, secure information transmission and imperviousness to external impacts, the spokesman said."

      Safe to say they likely fricked this modernization up.

      you have to give it to the ziggers. They are one of the biggest Potemkins villages in entire history, making westerners shit themselves thinking they are facing off a equal but evil version of themselves. So for nearly a century straight. If it were not for mainland China vatniks would proudly be the biggest smoke and mirror show in entire history.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Personally it may be that currently west MIC wants to be fooled in order to justify there budget. But they have recently done some pretty good proganada, mig-25, bombers stealth, night vision, inflating metal numbers.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Anything from the 80s onwards is 100% budget milking by MIC, although soviets' psyops bit them in the ass a ton of times regardless.

          Bomber gap, missile gap, night vision gap, fighter gap, cruiser gap, another missile gap, the list goes on.

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Next you’ll tell me Russia doesn’t even have tigers

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    jokes on you khohkol piggies. If our nooks dont work then there is no point to warning radars. Checkmate chuddies

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    All pro-russians should be dragged away from their desks and shot in the street
    If they get a few morons who were going along with this because "it was funny", that's even better
    simple as

  12. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I mean, what did you expect? They stole the electronics out of Putin's dooms day plane not long ago.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >They stole the electronics out of Putin's dooms day plane not long ago
      Jesus fricking Christ

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    It was useless to begin with that is why Chernobyl happened. Go watch pic related. It will give you an insight into Chernobyl, Russia and Ukraine like no other and take you up to the clankening

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous
    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Chornobyl and radars are not related in the slightest

      Isn't that in Ukraine?

      Yup. And there were some reports in 2019 about it being prepared for re-activation

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Chornobyl and radars are not related in the slightest
        You need to watch this. You are very wrong Chernobyl powered the woodpecker

        https://i.imgur.com/PJnsYaT.jpg

        It was useless to begin with that is why Chernobyl happened. Go watch pic related. It will give you an insight into Chernobyl, Russia and Ukraine like no other and take you up to the clankening

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Chernobyl powered the woodpecker
          And? ChAES generated 4GW of electricity, Duga used only a tiny amount compared to this

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            powered the woodpecker
            >And? ChAES generated 4GW of electricity, Duga used only a tiny amount compared to this
            Have you seen the film? If not go and watch it. You are wrong.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah, right. An explosion on a poorly designed and terribly built(check the info on ChAES construction) nuclear power plant was planned to cover up problems with a radar. That's bullshit, m8

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Bro duga is literally like 2km from the reactor, I have been there. It's actually very funny, the road changes from classic soviet slightly tarmacked road to military road with a sign saying this way to the children's summer camp or something.

        Get on some Google maps or something duga is in the exclusion zone

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hahah, I sure hope the early warning systems dont start sending out false positives.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      why would that happen? sure, their C&C systems have regularly sent out false "loss of regime" signals and "combat mode" signals (

      This is very interesting, and it immediatly reminded me of this:

      "In January 1997 Defense Minister Igor Rodionov wrote an alarming letter to Yeltsin. He said the command-and-control systems for Russia's nuclear forces--including the deep underground bunkers and the early-warning system--were falling apart. "No one today can guarantee the reliability of our control systems," Rodionov said. "Russia might soon reach the threshold beyond which its rockets and nuclear systems cannot be controlled."
      As of the late 1990s the command system and communications networks support nuclear operations, including launch on warning, were typically five or more years past due for overhaul and modernization, with some components ten or more years past their design life. The nuclear suitcases that receive early warning information and accompany the President, Defense Minister, and Chief of the General Staff, were falling into disrepair. Periodically the central command system would go into a "loss of regime" mode, which is a neutral position where it could not send out commands. There were also a few incidents in which individual missile silos or regiments would report to the center that they were in "combat mode" -- but the main system could prevent any accidental launch. Russian officials have repeatedly denied that the strategic forces command system is weakening. They say it has rigid controls against an accidental launch."

      The Russian nuclear forces are probably only a shadow of their former selves.

      >inb4 "hurr durr but they regularly do ICBM tests"
      Missile tests do not prove anything. During these tests, the missiles are controlled locally, it does not involve the EWS or the entire chain of the Russian nuclear forces, only the very bottom of the command and control chain, the guys who input the flight path and launch the missile.

      ), but they assured us that an accidental launch is definitely out of the question

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Frick me I would he running after it fell.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          why? if it didn't detonate on impact it's not going to.

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >foriegn made components
    I thought they had like 1 of 4 the entire factories left making vaccuum tubes

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >foreign made components
      ie: China probably

      1 of 3. (Russia, China, Slovakia)

      If Russia cheaped out and went to China for the power tubes, I can believe they are having reliability problems. China can't even get civilian tubes right.

  16. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I sure am glad literally who on twitter with 0 sources is here to tell us Ukraine is winning.

  17. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Did they buy all their shit on Alibaba? RIP in pierogi

  18. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Russian sat system has already shit the bed after several failures as they cut the program after launching less than half the desired number of sats in orbit, of which some are already not working. Even during soviet times they only in the 80s scrambled together a barely functional system which is notable for a number of false alarms and glitches.

    As russians replaced old soviet EW ground radars with this system, if it's out russia will become completely blind to an incoming attack, if it isn't already.

  19. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Go die in a ditch from krok boyo just like your brother

  20. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >everyone that doesn't agree with me worships Black folk
    maybe stop being a terminal contrarian you moron homosexual lmao

  21. 11 months ago
    Borderlands

    One ton of ball bearing would cripal the satellite system fore 100 years zero technology as thay orbit ate thousands of miles per hour nothing not even armor plating and zero chance of intercept . The Russian reminded of this a few times in the 1990 when we was bragging about our satellites. Once apon a time we sent or compatishion the world's smallest bolt thay drilled a hole in the bolt and taped it. American stupidity.v0wmwr

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous
    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Dude most ESLs at least try.

  22. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Breaking news: Russia - bad

  23. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    This isn't news. I've heard Chomsky mentioning this off-hand (without references to corruption) over a decade ago in the context of them being more trigger happy with nukes 'cause their shitty tech can tell only comparatively late that a first strike was launched against them.

  24. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm as pro nuclear energy as they come but this new meta of "We totally could have a nuke war the libs stole it from us with their lies" is moronic. "Nothing to be afraid of, only a few billions would die!!" is something else.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      nobody says this

      the real truth is we could nuke soviets into oblivion for 20 years with next to no reprecussions and chose not to but hardly anyone talks about that

  25. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    In all honesty US is only big count in recent history that lost fricking skycraper to aviation.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      True, other countries' false flag terror attacks are way less cool (e.g. a gay little drown with a minimal payload exploding near a flag on the Kremlin's roof).

  26. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >mfw

  27. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    The rest of the world should just nuke the shit out of Russia

  28. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I visited one of their old installations at Latvia, outside the town of Skrunda. Unfortunately for me the radar installations had already been destroyed in 1995 by US demolition experts who very generously funded the operation. Such kindness

    https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/skrunda.htm

    They had a whole military town built around it which is now a ghost town and forbidden to the public, this is the gym, the writing on the wall translates to "VICTORY BEGINS HERE"

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      they even shrunk all the pictures

  29. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    westerners
    >russia is so weak and pathetics
    also westerners
    >we must stop russia they are gonna conquer europe

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >westerners woth an IQ above 80
      is so weak and pathetics
      >also western MIC
      >>we must stop russia they are gonna conquer europe
      FTFY

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *