VOTE FOR BEST!

https://strawpoll.com/bVg8oqNDBnY/

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    yeah

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    F-100's not even remotely comparable to the other two
    F-104 would be a better comparison

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Its a better fighter bomber.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Mig-21 is da best.
    Fucking love these flying doritos.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      the J-7 is possibly the sexiest version

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It's by far the sexiest version

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Isn't the J-7G the most advanced Mig-21?
        Even better than the Bis?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          India also has their Bison which has a glass cockpit, HMS/HOBS and Active radar missiles.

          Pretty similar to the most modern J-7s in concept and execution

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Luv me flyin toobs with wings. Simple as

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I love all three cause their noses snorf like they oughta

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Sabre is the superior option
    I havent seen a Mig Dance or a Lightning Dance before

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    That exact Super Saber flew over me while I was stuck in traffic earlier today.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I’ll always be a North American fan (mustang) so the super Sabre activates my almonds.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    fuck off with your garbage, op

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Why is it garbage anon?

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You need to specify a MiG-21 variant, there are three generations of MiG-21 with quite varying capabilities.
    The one you have posted appears to be a Romanian MiG-21 bis, which is the last soviet variant from 1972, that would be an obvious choice over a lightning and especially an F-100.

    It has all weather capabilities, radar semi-active missiles, R-60 missiles, emergency afterburner ect.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Typical Lighting intercept if the Cold War had turned hot

    > take off from RAF Binbrook
    > 5 seconds later at 30,000 ft
    > approach Tupolev
    > Firestreak missile misses
    > too cloudy to fire Red Top missile
    > switch to guns
    > immediately run out of fuel and bail out

    The Brits were so good at coming up with interesting warplanes and so shit at actually arming them.

    Same as their early WW2 tanks

    > The “William The Conquerer” tank
    > weighs 150 tonnes
    > armed with one 2 pounder gun and a stick for poking Germans off the hill

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Come into thread
      >Thinly vieled bong seethe thread
      Yeah

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Lightning cos she SEXOOO AWOOGA

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why was the lightning pregnant anyway (Hot)
    Was there a reason why they didn't just make it a straight engine.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/cr1424g.jpg

      Lightning cos she SEXOOO AWOOGA

      Bump

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Ah, so it is a fartsniffer thread. He's literally the only retard that bothers bumping his gay threads.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Earlier lightnings had no Potbelly, it was added to provide more fuel, since the internal fuel capacity was very small.

      The most interesting thing about the lightning that many overlook is how large it actually is, the two engines stacked on top of each other make it look deceptively like a lighter interceptor in the vein of the MiG-21, Su-7, F-104 or Mirage, however it was about twice the size of those aircraft with an OEW more comparable to the F-4 phantom.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        One thing I have yet to understand is why they designed the wings the way they did. It's defined as a notched delta, but in essence it's a very swept back rectangular wing.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *