US Special Forces

The deadliest weapons on Earth.
Although how many 'special forces' does one military need?
SEALs, Delta, Green Berets, Rangers, etc

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They would lose their shit if someone misgendered them

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      None of which would last ten minutes on a bus full of angry indians

      Ah my mistake. I thought I was on old /k/, not nu/k/ where we just suck off Ukraine all day and hardly talk about weapons.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >not night/k/ vs day /k/
        Fricking newbie

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Here's your night /k/.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      FPBP
      I reckon our special operations boys are but a shadow of greatness compared to 25+ years ago. Now we have zoomerhomosexuals training to be SEALs. They probably have a special staff to keep them from shagging each other in the barracks.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        t. obese gen-x sperg

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      None of which would last ten minutes on a bus full of angry indians

      >false flag pajeet thread
      Da, globohomosexual biolabs for pride month? Clot shot bad amirite? We are all demoralized but your pathetic display, Russian influence troll farm poster…..

      Posting WARRIORTARD so British messaging partners can bully OP

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      US military is, what, 3% LGBT? Really doubt any of them joined special forces. Maybe four or five gay dudes.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    None of which would last ten minutes on a bus full of angry indians

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    While they serve an useful role (which they're quite decent at). I don't believe they're the "deadliest weapons on Earth" or even close to it. The people they're typically fighting aren't what one would consider "conventional" but that's irrelevant given they're specialized for such a task.
    Tldr; I'm not really impressed with some feats seen over the last 20 years

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don't know... Reading about how they hunted Saddam's friends and family was fricking crazy. And running into booby trapped houses to rescue hostages.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They should do Qatar next

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        tell about it

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i think ukraine shows that special forces can both be very effective and a complete waste of time and resources in other places.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That's been clear for a very long time
        Redwings was pretty clear from the get go of all this, stick to your fricking jobs

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >false flag pajeet thread
    Da, globohomosexual biolabs for pride month? Clot shot bad amirite? We are all demoralized but your pathetic display, Russian influence troll farm poster…..

    Posting WARRIORTARD so British messaging partners can bully OP

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Here's what russian special forces look like in 2024, for comparison

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >not posting pic of fertilizer
      you had one job!

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They take 6x as long to complete the French Foreign Legion's obstacle course as they do. And they always appear 6 months to 2 years later on the battlefield.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There is only one Special Forces, and those are the Green Berets. All the other groups you have very specific missions sets beyond just being very good at shooting people.

    >SEALS
    Underwater demolition experts, and your go to force when any shenanigans happen on or near water. The fact that they have been heavily used in the desert doesn't mean they're competing with other forces. They're capable of doing raids and VIP protection so we used them for that.

    >Delta
    Are capable of everything GBs can do plus whatever stuff the Government wants to deny.
    >Green Berets
    GBs are used to build guerilla forces or an army in a country. They're unique because a single GB team is supposed to be able to expand to like company or battalion size with the 12 guys as command personnel in charge of foreigners. They excel in all things infantry because they have to teach and train infantry tactics to foreign nationals.
    >Rangers
    Super high speed light infantry. They often work in conjunction with other SOF as a QRF, but also independently when the military needs to deploy an elite battalion or company somewhere quickly to frick shit up or seize a high value military target.

    This is a general overview and those guys are capable of much more than I stated, but civilians often seem to that being good at shooting people is all they do when it goes a lot deeper than that.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >no pararescue or combat controllers

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Chair Force shit

        Don't care. I also only mentioned the units in the OP

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Lol special recon is probably the closest to a real military hitman, literally assassination and political espionage is a part of their mission.
          Combat Controllers out perform seals in their area of expertise and even then exceed beyond them.
          Pararescue are the guys who get called when any tier one unit has a catastrophe, they are literally guardian angels.
          Green Beret's are cool though. Rangers are cool too, all of them work together and fill in for the others shortcomings, seals aren't liked well by anybody outside their circle

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Pararescue are for rescuing, mostly pilots
        CCTs integrate in other teams

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >how many 'special forces' does one military need
      US military only has one.

      >uhhhm actually those guys are aren't special forces they're special operations
      no one gives a frick you pedantic homos.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    All of them. Put all that shit in a taskforce plus the various groups you left out and you can get any mission done in 72 hours or less anywhere in the world. Deal with it.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >how many 'special forces' does one military need
    US military only has one.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They all have different purposes, though the GWOT made them all participate in direct action CQB shit at one point or another.
    There's also a shit ton of other special coolguy units that aren't public whatsoever, but their missions are far less flashy so they don't get talked about as much or mentioned in rumors.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >t. losing to this
    >t. no drinkable tap water
    didnt watch but yeah

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Wow that Asian girl is cute.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    America has not won a single war since the invention of their stupid kind

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Gulf War Black person

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        We win everything up until the precise moment we decide we've lost. Then we lost.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      As if ~~*they*~~ would let em. Please If this was any other time in history the US would've bulldozed Iraq and Afghan, kicked the people out and set up new colonies.

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Bunch of homosexuals if you ask me.

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >how many 'special forces' does one military need?
    Honestly... as many as they need. The US needs SF to raise, train, and lead foreign militias. It needs rangers for missions requiring a large'ish number of best-of-the-best shock troops. It needs Delta for small, surgical missions of critical importance. The navy arguably needs SEALs for the occasional naval special operation. They are combat divers, after all. Because the Army has limited aviation in its structure, it needs the Air Force to supply it detachments of elite-level combat controllers with a direct line to AF assets. The AF itself needs pararescuemen to insert deeply into enemy territory and rescue extremely valuable aircrews.

    Special operations are not really a meme. There's a reason why things are the way they are, and a lot of it comes down to the logistical requirements of having different, semi-autonomous branches of the military specializing in different aspects of war.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Lol special recon is probably the closest to a real military hitman, literally assassination and political espionage is a part of their mission.
      Combat Controllers out perform seals in their area of expertise and even then exceed beyond them.
      Pararescue are the guys who get called when any tier one unit has a catastrophe, they are literally guardian angels.
      Green Beret's are cool though. Rangers are cool too, all of them work together and fill in for the others shortcomings, seals aren't liked well by anybody outside their circle

      Can I get a qrd on the difference between CCT and TACP?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's basically different levels of qualifications. CCT being the highest level can call in more support than the other, can juggle more planes in the air while also calling fire support from other branches.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        one calls bombs, the other calls bombs and also is an air traffic controller and can set up emergency airfields and is an officer

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >a few handful of SOF managed to prevent the afghan government from collapsing before pulling out
    When you realized that the Taliban was not able to defeat the ANA despite America only sending less than 10k soldiers there for 8 years

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      To put that 10K in perspective because it might sound a lot to some, there are 40K cops just in New York City.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >America only sending less than 10k soldiers there for 8 years
      Are you saying that only 10,000 infantrymen served in Afghanistan, or that there were at most 10k serving in country at the highest point? Neither figure seems right to me.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Here's a chart. That other guys was exaggerating a bit but there were years where the numbers were under 10K.

        >infantrymen

        Total troops. Not just infantryman. That includes soldiers that repair vehicles, cook, etc. Only a small fraction of soldiers are infantryman.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Majority of combat troops were SOF btw. Which put things into prospective. All of them were there to deal with ISIS

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Majority of combat troops were SOF btw

            source?

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              His butthole.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Seems like it.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              There were barely combat troops left. Majority of troops there were there to maintain bases/train local forces. The ones that were doing operations were SOF dealing with IS-k. Any operations against the Taliban were non existent aside from occasional air strikes in support of local Ana troops

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        After 2012-13 the usa had like 12k soldiers until they left

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Post OEF Afghanistan(2014-2021)
        Had like around less than 10k soldiers in the country. The last few years in Afghanistan had less than 2.5k-3k soldiers.

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]
    Wow that Asian girl is cute.

    dey frickin

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *