US just bought Jordans entire Gepard fleet for Ukraine

https://news.yahoo.com/us-purchases-60-gepard-anti-184234499.html

These were only sold to the Jordanians 10 years ago. Now they're going back to Germany for a quick maintenance cycle and then off to Ukraine.

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Lmao holy shit Jordan is fucked

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >jordan is fucked
      from who? they're literally a client state with Israel. Nobody is going to attack them

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        t. Just watched a YouTube video

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The ~90 million USD of profit made in the sale to the US can be turned around and re-invested into even more air defenses.
      22 mil spent vs 110 mil received.
      One hand washes the other.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >22 mil spent
        >60 vehicles
        How cheap are these things?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They were/are surplus vehicles from the 70's.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        110 mil doesn't pay for 60 skyrangers. If they'd even be sold to them.

        >22 mil spent
        >60 vehicles
        How cheap are these things?

        Cheap as fuck, back when europeans were just trying to get rid of them. Not so cheap now.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >110 mil received
        Received from whom?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It’s probably safe to assume that some of the purchase expenses will be going towards refurbishment and upgrades.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          pretty safe to just assume that whatever dollar figure they report is being calculated in the most retarded way possible.
          Like those M113s where the value was reported using the unamortized 1960s purchase price in 2022 dollars and not the actual negative book value they were worth because otherwise we'd have to pay some contractor to scrap em.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            yep pretty retarded

            $100,000 *30 years *3% CPI

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            On the plus side, if the Ukraine funding runs out the DoD can always 'correct' the valuation of the equipment we've sent to free up money.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Big money moves

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Now they're going back to Germany for a quick maintenance cycle
      German quick maintenance means we'll see them in two years.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Gepards were already out of service and Germany reactivated them and sent them to Ukraine in 2022 already. This batch will be sent within a short time too.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >buy cheap shit gepards from germany for cents
    >sell to US for big dollars.
    Guys, I think we found the true mastermind behind the Ukraine war.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      those dirty maronites at it again

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Eyebrows status?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Falling off to be picked when gloves are found from ass

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Did they manage to convince Switzerland to allow ammo exports?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nah, swiss MI is fucked. Germany just build a completely new ammo line. Only stupids still buy swiss.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Only stupids still buy swiss.
        Yep they fucked up their entire weapons industry with their neutrality shit.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          But that b&t apc308 looks pretty neat

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No, Rheinmetall already set up a new production line in germany and is contracted to produce 300,000 rounds of which they already delivered a first batch back in september.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can't wait for those cheap milsurp Gepard's in the next few years bros. I'm already saving up to snag one once Russia finishes stabbing itself to death

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Hate to brake it to you, but it's only gonna be Tunguska for you, anon.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >brake
        idiot

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >once Russia finishes stabbing itself to death
      > "finishes"
      optimist

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        under rated

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You underestimate krokodil-fueled endurance. They can set themselves on fire, lop their cocks off, and still keep shambling like a crack zombie on Captain America's steroids cocktail.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why didn't they make Germany buy it at an inflated price?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Show aftermatch nagger. Let the whole class see what did that lancet did to that gepard

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >aftermatch
        >see what did that lancet did

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This was also recorded from another drone you subhuman shitskin so show me aftermatch. or don;t if you want people to see how shitty lancet is lmao

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This was also recorded from another drone you subhuman shitskin so show me aftermatch. or don;t if you want people to see how shitty lancet is lmao

        >good morning sirs

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Lurk moar.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >show what did lancet did the deed
            >when ass is in the ass
            >superpower 1980

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              NTA but are you going to post the aftermath or not. So far Lancet's greatest "hit" is landing slightly to the right of an SU-25

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      welp it took me 10 minutes to find the video and it's the most disappointing shit in existence

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >hitting dirt to the right of it
        nice clock

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >miss
        -le lancet

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >hitting dirt to the right of it
          nice clock

          I wonder when that guy who had a folder of 400+ lancet """hits"""" will actually post them.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >I wonder when that guy who had a folder of 400+ lancet """hits"""" will actually post them.
            remeber when there was supposed to be a "daily lancet thread"?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              ukrainians release so many kamikaze racing drone strike videos every day i just glaze over them, but one lancet a day is too much. not even one, you can call something daily without actually being daily. perhaps three lancets a week would suffice, and it's still too much to ask.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Maybe the mods finally rangebanned India.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Gepard: "Like I give a fuck."

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Almost as disappointing as when it hits a Bradley

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          so it just hit the ARAT and did fuck all? because that's what it looks like.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why was it not moving or trying to intercept the missile?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It only intercepts threats

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Okay, now someone give a real answer.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Too small, low, and slow for the radar to pick it up as a potential target, or you'd have the Gepard shooting down every larger bird.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                More like it wasn't picked up because the radar dish isn't even extended, anon.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              doesn't look like it was active

              lost, tired, crew wandered off, who knows

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >couldn't even hit let alone destroy an unoccupied piece of armor in an open field
                kek

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          that one was abandoned after a mine hit, so its even more sad that the Lancet barely dinked it

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            why would you drive a gepard anywhere near where mines are?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I see now why the other anon posted the edited version.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >it's the most disappointing shit in existence
        It's funny because the Russians tried to hype it as a Gepard getting destroyed and instead of turned a 70s shitbox into some invincible beast.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That Gepard was incapaciated before, crew left and Russians were trying to destroy it before Ukies tow it away.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        kek
        then why the fuck was the camera was pointing at it? and fucking how

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          the drone drifts to the left and is unable to correct resulting in a very close miss. lancet has a smol warhead so the damage is probably close to zero

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >lancet has a smol warhead so the damage is probably close to zero
            this
            wasn't there a direct hit on a pzh2000 that didn't even pen?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Where's the earth shattering kaboom?

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >The weapons originated from the Netherlands, which sold them to Jordan in 2013 for 21 million euros. Only 10 years later, the DoD purchased them from Jordan for 110 million euros.
    I can see why Jordan was willing to let them go. A 5x return on investment, not accounting for inflation.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Yeah we don't have any use for these SPAAG's anymore because we're so high and mighty (and this way us Dutch generals and politicans can line our pockets)
      >We'll sell them off to Jordan because what possible use could we have for them
      >Turns out that having no SHORAD will fuck you up completely in an actual war
      I'm dutch and seeing how these jordanian stocks are pretty much the Dutch gepards it pains me to see how fucking retarded all of this is.

      No, Rheinmetall already set up a new production line in germany and is contracted to produce 300,000 rounds of which they already delivered a first batch back in september.

      >300,000 rounds
      This seems like an extremely limited amount, especially how many rounds these things fire.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >how many rounds these things fire
        Wiki says this
        >It is standard to fire bursts against air targets, 24 rounds per gun for a total of 48 in limited mode and 48 rounds per gun for a total of 96 in normal mode.
        So assuming you spend 100 rounds on a single target, that's 3000 targets to defeat. Hard to tell if that's enough, but I would hope the ukies provided statistics of their ammo usage and production was planned accordingly.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >This seems like an extremely limited amount, especially how many rounds these things fire.
        If they need more germany will probably pay for another batch since they've doubled down on the whole military aid thing.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >>300,000 rounds
        >This seems like an extremely limited amount, especially how many rounds these things fire.
        That was the first batch/order that incentiviced Rheinmetall to build the production facility.

        >programming the fuses in the shells so they explode at the right distance
        AFAIK the Gepard doesnt shoot those kind of shells, no proximity fuses either. You have to score a direct hit on your target to make them explode.

        That's right, if you want to you can refit the Gepard with the AHEAD system. Would be nice but isn't strictly necessary against the "large" targets that Shaheeds are.

        >how many rounds these things fire
        Wiki says this
        >It is standard to fire bursts against air targets, 24 rounds per gun for a total of 48 in limited mode and 48 rounds per gun for a total of 96 in normal mode.
        So assuming you spend 100 rounds on a single target, that's 3000 targets to defeat. Hard to tell if that's enough, but I would hope the ukies provided statistics of their ammo usage and production was planned accordingly.

        Drone intercepts are done with six round bursts, most intercepts in the past year used two to three of those short bursts. So something along the lines of less than 20 rounds / intercept is the base for speculating ammo needs.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Sounds like 300k rounds are more than enough.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yep, it is. First Gepards were supplied with 500 rounds (or less) per vehicle

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >This seems like an extremely limited amount, especially how many rounds these things fire.

        IIRC they fire 5 rounds in a burst per barrel, I think they even fire only one barrel burst per drone intercept, alternating between barrels.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Growers are so cool and now vital that cruise missile and drone spam is a tactic. Taiwan needs to invest in systems like this.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I believe Taiwan already operates their own domestic SPAAGs.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          LOL nope. The only one they ever did was the freakin M42 Duster, which they still have a few sitting around of IIRC.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            hory shet, you're right, they have nothing of the sort

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What is that small cylinder in front that seems to articulate separately? I see no lenses or radar windows.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Radar transparent cupola on targeting radar dish that swivels 180° (with the guns I guess.)

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Pretty sure that's a short range radar or rangefinder.
        Probably something to do with programming the fuses in the shells so they explode at the right distance.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Probably tracking radar. Seems it has several variants or detachable parts. AFAIK fuse programming usually happens at muzzle when exact speed is measured.

          Radar transparent cupola on targeting radar dish that swivels 180° (with the guns I guess.)

          I don't mean the dish at rear. Thats search radar as it scans 360 very fast independently of turret.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            forgut picrel

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              It's the tracking radar for automatic engagement.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >programming the fuses in the shells so they explode at the right distance
          AFAIK the Gepard doesnt shoot those kind of shells, no proximity fuses either. You have to score a direct hit on your target to make them explode.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the small thing on the front of the turret is the fire-control radar
        so KU for the German and X/KA for the Dutch

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i didnt know the loitering anti radar drone was already a thing in the late 80s. turns out it was nearly adopted by the bundeswehr. lmao imagine nato dunking on soviet sam system with massive use of anti radar drones followed by an even more massive dessert storm like air campaign

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Krauts were ahead but the wall came down and nobody could see it coming that 30 years later old NATO shit was still ahead of the game, be it drones, MLRS, smart ammo... 30 years and still ahead, others just catching up.
        NATO, I kneel.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's actually almost 40 years.
          The 70s-80s germany was the best germany.
          The 90s germany was the best party germany.
          Going brown ever since.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Going brown ever since.
            Oh god, not again.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              He cute though

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/FfP7ePo.jpg

        Krauts were ahead but the wall came down and nobody could see it coming that 30 years later old NATO shit was still ahead of the game, be it drones, MLRS, smart ammo... 30 years and still ahead, others just catching up.
        NATO, I kneel.

        80s NATO, lightyears ahead.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/5QEFmZa.jpg

          [...]
          [...]
          >lightyears

          https://i.imgur.com/Kq4icNt.jpg

          [...]
          [...]
          [...]
          1986 boys... 1986

          very interesting!

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/FfP7ePo.jpg

        Krauts were ahead but the wall came down and nobody could see it coming that 30 years later old NATO shit was still ahead of the game, be it drones, MLRS, smart ammo... 30 years and still ahead, others just catching up.
        NATO, I kneel.

        https://i.imgur.com/uueG2iD.jpg

        [...]
        80s NATO, lightyears ahead.

        >lightyears

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/FfP7ePo.jpg

        Krauts were ahead but the wall came down and nobody could see it coming that 30 years later old NATO shit was still ahead of the game, be it drones, MLRS, smart ammo... 30 years and still ahead, others just catching up.
        NATO, I kneel.

        https://i.imgur.com/uueG2iD.jpg

        [...]
        80s NATO, lightyears ahead.

        https://i.imgur.com/5QEFmZa.jpg

        [...]
        [...]
        >lightyears

        1986 boys... 1986

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          is that a wooden core? or is it just the print

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The text specifically mentions fiberglass (literally: glass fiber reinforced plastic), plywood and aluminium.
            Doesn't say which part is what.

            BUt it is beyond hilarious that a German project from 1986 is a Russian and Iranian wunderwaffe in 2023.
            Kinda sad we don't have swarms of these things, but that is what teh end of the Cold War did to us.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              its made up of wood, fiberglass and aluminium

              thanks

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              It may look similar, but what makes shahed useful is modern guidance tech.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >modern guidance
                It's from Iran and uses the GPS chip out of a TomTom.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            its made up of wood, fiberglass and aluminium

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The text specifically mentions fiberglass (literally: glass fiber reinforced plastic), plywood and aluminium.
            Doesn't say which part is what.

            BUt it is beyond hilarious that a German project from 1986 is a Russian and Iranian wunderwaffe in 2023.
            Kinda sad we don't have swarms of these things, but that is what teh end of the Cold War did to us.

            its made up of wood, fiberglass and aluminium

            [...]
            thanks

            Pretty much standard R/C airplane construction techniques from the 1980s, at least for the larger models. Small ones just used balsa and cyanoacrylate glue and were covered with colored plastic shrink-wrap film (Monokote).

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          US had TV guided suicide drones in the pacific theater during WWII.
          It’s crazy how far back this tech goes.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's truly amazing to scrutinizing war-time inventions in WWII and see that most of the technology we regard as advanced in current days, was pioneered back in WWII or even during the 1930s. Hell, I think the German's even had a prototype for a bomber launched remotely-guided anti-ship missile back near the end of the war.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Try late 1943. Remotely guided in that it was a MCLOS weapon - the bomberdier had to steer it with a joystick like an RC plane, similar to the Fritz X glide bomb.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                During late WWI there were developments of MCLOS glide bombs/torpedos, supercharged-turbocharged engines etc. Ammonium perchlorate production was 'huge' and most of it stopped after the war so rocketry couldn't take advantage of it. 2-4 years more of WWI and the WWII could have been very different.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Hell, I think the German's even had a prototype for a bomber launched remotely-guided anti-ship missile back near the end of the war.
              Not just a prototype, at least one major ship was sunk with a Fritz X.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            We also had active-radar guided fire-and-forget AShMs that were used in combat.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Correction: the ASM-N-2 Bat was a glide bomb not a missile.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          These guys dug it out in 22:
          https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/us-german-harassment-drone-locust-dar-designs.29312/
          Seems the design is from 79/80.
          Locust drone.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Thank God someone is showing some foresight, I'm sure Russia is planning a new sneed spam campaign for the next winter and these are a hard counter.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Krauts themselves also announced they'll be delivering more IRIS-T within the next 6 weeks.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The dirka-drones were pretty well hard countered even before now. A lawnmower engine powering a balsa wood frame with an expired mortar in the nose wasn't too hard to outwit. Hell, they can be taken by rifle fire.

      I do hope when this is over, though, that Ukraine provides material aid to whichever terrorist group is most violent in Iran. The dirkas need a more concrete punishment for their mischief.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So was this to help israel or Ukraine?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >was this to help the country dealing with lots of drones and cruise missiles or the country that's maybe lost one tank total in their "war"

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >was this to help the country that actually needs them or the country all the Ameriisraelite politicians are beholden to

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          hey have you ever seen all the bitter whining from israelis over the US strongarming them into humanitarian ceasefires by threatening to withhold munitions deliveries

          no lol you're brown and you learn from pictures the internet shows you

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm surprised after all the bullshit we've seen that anyone would give their Gepards up and that Rheinmetal isn't just shitting out loads of them.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Last full production run was literally 50 years ago. I'm pretty sure the line doesn't even exist anymore and they're just producing spare parts kits on commission now.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Last full production run was literally 50 years ago. I'm pretty sure the line doesn't even exist anymore and they're just producing spare parts kits on commission now.

      There's a modern replacement, better radar and ammo but not on a tank chassis (so less armor)

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's not being produced for ukraine though, and not in large numbers. Might be that's smart, not to let the russians get their hand on it and also to wait for lessons from the ukraine war to be incorporated. Might also be ukraine would be great for testing it.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They're apparently getting truck mounted ones. Probably more useful for point defense for infrastructure.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous
            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Crocodile bros... why isn't it shaking like crazy?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Crocodile bros... why isn't it shaking like crazy?

                The rate of fire is so high that it is more of a continous force than a series of impulses.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'd guess that the firing system takes the sway into account. It's a German machine, not the botch job of a bmp-t made by drunk russians.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              DEW bros... why can't we do that?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Don't worry anon, DEWbros will have their time in the sun

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I was considering what Jordan would get with their 110 millions to replace the Gepards

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Why does the AAA missile pod has only two compartments for the missiles?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The froggies have shown a mock-up of a version with 4 Mistrals.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          cant you make miniature versions of these dedicated short range AA rapid fire guns. Something that feeds off belt 7.62 or 12.7 or such so ammo is plentiful and has the necessary radar+guidance electronics to rapidly detect and shoot at nearby small drones. Something you can bolt on everything from heavy armor to trucks. Point defence but without just around the corner future memes like affordable high powered lasers

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            With enough money you can do anything.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Cute. I want one too

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >testing it
          Maybe it was worthwhile half a year ago. But at this point, the russians don’t really have anything worthwhile to throw at it and the risk of capture outweighs testing it it vs. it fighting 50+ year old russian hardware.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >not on a tank chassis (so less armor)
        Are we even sure that a boxer chassis hass worse armor than a leopard I one?

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How the fuck are they going to feed them? They already had problems with 10 of them

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Rheinmetall's new 35mm line went operational 2 months ago.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I wonder what the weekly output of shells might be. For some reasons these production lines always seem lower than one would think. And given the case of the krauts' autistic precision and QC standards the production can't be that many thousand shells / week, can it?

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >the US is buying up all the middle eastern gear and sending it far away
    ISRAEL
    WILL
    GROW
    LARGER

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Jordan is one of the few Middle East states that actually likes the US and vice versa, and as such they get along with Israel, relatively speaking.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Israel and the Jordan government are secret allies

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Very smart of Jordan

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Secret? Jordan has blown up more pallies and 'taken' more of 'their land' than Israel has.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      while jordan has been at war with israel they signed a peace agreement 30 years ago that has held to this day.

      total jordinian deaths in all of their wars with isreal are like 2300, i don't think they hold much of a grudge, either.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How much is the US paying for them? Jordan was just begging the US for more equipment. Odd they would sell what they already have.

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm actually getting tired of the Couch Cushion War

    Anyone know what I mean? The West is in a superimposition of helping Ukraine while still changing as little as possible about its own "peacetime" footing

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it's pretty gay, yeah

      what would have been the downside to that 12 million round minimum contract that was asked for US artillery manufacturers to spin up a bunch of extra lines?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nothing. The problem is that the 4th columnists in teh US and European parliaments are blocking things.

        But as long as teh ziggers die, things are moving in the right direction.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >4th columnists
          Did you mean 5th columnists, or am I totally misunderstanding you?

          'the west' is a construct of Muscovite propaganda, it is not one single entity, there is little to no coordinated action beyond a desire for Russia to just stop being completely fucking retarded.

          >'the west' is a construct of Muscovite propaganda
          Nonsense. The West is defined as Western Christendom, as opposed to Eastern Christendom. East = Orthodox and the Oriental Churches. West = Catholics, Protestants, and Anglicans(often mistakenly categorized as Protestants), plus all their wacky spinoffs like Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses

          >inB4 episcopapal screeching
          Fuck off, you guys ignored Luther until your king found it convenient to get a divorce

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            By your reckoning does The West include South America and Christian Africa?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >The West is defined as Western Christendom,

            Bullshit. The West = Angloisraelites and their gang members (NATO), hang around wannabee prospects (Sweden) and the gimp (Germany)

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      'the west' is a construct of Muscovite propaganda, it is not one single entity, there is little to no coordinated action beyond a desire for Russia to just stop being completely fucking retarded.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Europe wants to rek Russia and make America pay for it, America wants to rek Russia and make Europe pay for it

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Welcome to NATO politics of the last 70 years. All in all, the situation is excellent, in the Foch-ian sense.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      And that is bad why?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it's pretty gay, yeah

      what would have been the downside to that 12 million round minimum contract that was asked for US artillery manufacturers to spin up a bunch of extra lines?

      things will liven up after the muscovite cancer absorbs belarus and attacks the baltic states and ukraine. Which pulls the poles into the war directly at minimum. this thing is guaranteed to flare up into a regional war since ukranians have not managed to completely defang the inheritance left by the vatnik union drunkard daddy to their young churka-mongol gangbanger son

      right now western nations are still partially in cope mode hoping this thing will end with ukraine not understanding this is merely the poland phase

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The baltics and Poland are all part of Nato and EU though

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          so what. in vatnigs head they are already fighting whole of west so makes no difference if directly killing them or fighting their perceived proxies, the ukranians/lithuanians/latvians/poles/estonians/finns etc. It makes no difference what western nations think about it in reality, all that matters is how the aggressor justifies its reasoning and the actions resulting from said perceptions

          EU is merely a economic alliance, nothing more, nothing less. no military relevance

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I don't think even the Russians are stupid enough to attack NATO right now, anon. I think they've got their hands full.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            They are not that dumb. They are already struggling in Ukraine attacking Poland is a complete suicide. Only reason Ukraine happened at all is because they believed their wet dreams about Zelensky running away pissing himself and entire Ukrainian military surrendering in a week.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >EU is merely a economic alliance, nothing more, nothing less. no military relevance
            Most larger EU countries and their people would still want to defend their ally.
            Orbans Hungary and PIS Poland excluded of course. :^)

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              And PiS is gone by December.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              PiS would still march to aid, it's Fico's Slovakia's weakling mentality that unironically had Latvians doubting whether or not they had a unreliable element in their NATO battlegroup.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                More like, a german wouldn't want to come to PiSlands aid.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Wrong, our politicians would go on about historical responsibility blablabla before they send anything that still works even if it's armed with black broomsticks

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If, say Trump had won and exited NATO, then russia would have gone and attacked poland while threatening nukes as russians do... I am really uncertain whether that would have happened. Not without brits or french giving ultimate reassurance that their nuclear umbrella holds, that's for sure. Maybe not even then. German politicians are mostly cowards after all.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                All I know is that our leaders are masters at virtue signaling and they don't give a shit about the German taxpayer.Im glad that this shit show is contained Ukraine for now and it makes me happy that our weapons are doing what they were designed for(killing vatniks)

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >they don't give a shit about the German taxpayer
                Germans are a lot more liberal with their taxes than with their safety.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The sorry state of our local infrastructure says otherwise.we really need to tone down all the bs bureaucracy since it burns our money.our military procurement has the same problem.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Article 42 of the Treaty on European Union:
            >7. If a Member State is the victim of armed aggression on its territory, the other Member States shall have towards it an obligation of aid and assistance by all the means in their power, in accordance with Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. This shall not prejudice the specific character of the security and defence policy of certain Member States.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Russia is currently starting to flood Finnish border with bicycle equipped paperless young immigrants who want a refugee status, right at the start of winter.

            How did the Belarus-Poland standoff end? Time to see if EU has learned anything (they haven't I'm sure)

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >How did the Belarus-Poland standoff end? Time to see if EU has learned anything (they haven't I'm sure)
              They sent Frontex and the Poles built a wall™

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                but walls dont work or so I have been told for the last near decade

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Walls don't work on the long term. They are a band-aid for a hemmoraging wound. Just like the ancient wisdom goes: "There is no wall high enough that an ass loaded with gold would not walk over it". Even the Berlin wall didn't work, people found a way to get through.

                The thing is that walls don't address the underlying issue. They don't do anything to the source of the problem. "Treat the cause of the illness, not the symptom" that sort of thing. The problem in this case is Russia being monster who uses hybrid warfare and organizes waves of refugees to make things difficult for other nations. Just to make things shitty for others. The solution is, obviously, Total zi... I mean to make sure that Russian government stops using such asshole tactics and starts behaving like a reasonable country.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                How did a serf state manage to build a better wall than the US of A

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No Democrats and RINOs sabotaging it.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >how
                Texas put up barbed wire barriers and the us government sued Texas to remove them

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >their perceived proxies, the ukranians/lithuanians/latvians/poles/estonians/finn
            these nations are not proxies, once they reach a certain level of development they become a part of the collective West itself
            >We are the West. You will be assimilated.
            >Your cultural and biological distinctiveness will be added to our own.
            >Resistance is futile

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >and attacks the baltic states
        With what? They blew through their maneuver echelons long ago. Right now their offensive tempo is WW1 tier.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >attack NATO
        > "flare up into a regional war"
        vatnaggers are, literally, this completely fucking insane and delusional

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They believe everyone else's alliances are as worthless as CSTO is.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >attack NATO
            > "flare up into a regional war"
            vatnaggers are, literally, this completely fucking insane and delusional

            The baltics and Poland are all part of Nato and EU though

            Nobody would actually start a world war over fucking Poland, that's retarded

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous
            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous
            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Nobody would actually start a world war over fucking Poland, that's retarded
              Ja that would be very silly.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What would happen if i were to boop Hitler on the nose?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                He would call you silly and offer you some pervitin.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Hell yeah I love meth

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >t. Aimo Koivunen

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah Russia should totally try it, what could possibly go wrong

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous
            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous
            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              And Ukrainian army will just surrender when we march on Keev

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              PUTIN WILL RAISE HIS EYEBROW AND NATO WILL UNDERSTAND WE HAVE NOOKS GIVE US ALL OF EUROPE OR NOOK NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >after the muscovite cancer absorbs belarus
        >implying it won't be belarus annexing russia
        Luka is just waiting for the right moment

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    These things are great to take out Iranian drones. Just place one or two near energy infrastructure

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    these fuckers are in Jordan quietly used as tractors probably or parades

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What does the gepard sound like if you phonetically spell out the noise it makes when it fires?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Gepards goes BRRRRRRRR

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I think we'll be ok without our (allies') 50-year-old SPAAGs that were previously sold to a non-aligned country.

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Yes giving them multiple carrier battle groups really did make a dent in our force projection capacity and was a huge mistake, i john hamburger from kentucky oblast am agreed

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >gepard shows up for the delayed east vs west:retard rumble
    >meanwhile tunguska is nowhere to be seen

    What´s up with that? They´re fielding ancient AA guns hazardly welded to the top of MT-LB´s but they can´t find a dozen working tunguska?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Monke is stilll fighting with velvet gloves on his paws.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Here's your Tunguskas bro.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        if only the Tsar knew!

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Just imagine how many are cannibalized for parts in Russia.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      remember the funniest shit? that the moment Gepards were hitting the battlefield the Russians said they destroyed one, by posting a picture of a burned out Tunguska?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >meanwhile tunguska is nowhere to be seen

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Considering

        Here's your Tunguskas bro.

        it's possible the crews are trying to get their stuff hit so that they get replacements that maybe work this time.
        That's what I'd do at least, they spend munitions on a useless target and maybe the new one actually works this time.

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why hasnt the US just given Ukraine its Abrams, Bradley, and Stryker fleet? It's like we want Ukraine to lose and care more about pretending our vehicles are invincible instead of allowing them to be combat tested by swrving in Ukraine.

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >US just bought Jordans entire Gepard fleet for Ukraine
    Why the fuck did Jim have an entire fleet of them?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      got them for pennies from the Dutch way back

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Damn, that doubles their total supply, nice.

        >from the Dutch
        So they're the X/Ka-band variants? Interesting.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Wearing net underwear.
          Based twink bundeswehr. I am gonna join in my next life.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Got to subdue those wrestling teens somehow

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Has there ever been anything like this? A 50 year old weapons system gaining 500% in price because it turns out to be super effective against a new type of weapon that it wasn't originally designed for
    It's super bizarre but I'm proud of the little guy

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the Gepard wasn't designed to fight drones originally BUT the models still in service today have a major software update to help them target small UAS
      it's not like the original design was this effective

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        and that update is also already nearly 20 years old, so before the rise of mass mini drone warfare.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          western countries saw the writing on the wall a looooong time ago dude. the FIM-92K had an anti-drone update in the 90s

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >have a major software update to help them target small UAS
        Some ukranian user of the Gepard joked about how they track large birds for fun, i think it was seaguls.

  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This war needs a lot more fun-o-fun.
    Wiesels fucking when?!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Would Wiesels work in Ukraine?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, mobile firepower can be useful.
        Unfortunately there aren't many Wiesel out there.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        with like 100 or more, yes.
        Otherwise those would not really make a difference

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        see bmd

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No, their entire concept is to have mobile firepower for "panzerungünstiges Gelände", meaning terrain unsuitable for tanks. Ukraine is really flat and doesn't have a lot of large forests. Therefore the Wiesel would be at a constant disadvantage versus heavier armed and armored verhicles.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What about Rasputitsa?
          Ukraine does have dense forests at the border with Belarus.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >What about Rasputitsa?
            This is a big enough event to mostly halt all movement warfare ideas. Because even if your tanks might still be able to move (and eastern tank models with their lower ground pressure are better at that) the logistics train cannot.

            >Ukraine does have dense forests at the border with Belarus.
            And mountains in the West. But where the enemy is, the terrain is suitable for heavier vehicles.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Belarus is part of the enemy. They attacked from there once and there's need for a deterrent to stop them from trying again.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Ukraine might be able to lean on Mother Nature for some help. Pic rel.
                https://focus.ua/uk/voennye-novosti/605804-ukrajinskiy-kaban-vpolyuvav-rosiysku-drg-na-kordoni-z-bilorussyu-ye-zhertvi-socmerezhi
                https://focus-ua.translate.goog/uk/voennye-novosti/605804-ukrajinskiy-kaban-vpolyuvav-rosiysku-drg-na-kordoni-z-bilorussyu-ye-zhertvi-socmerezhi?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Belarus is part of the enemy. They attacked from there once and there's need for a deterrent to stop them from trying again.
                In an ideal scenario maybe. In the reality of war everything is in short supply all the time. So you always have to make tradeoffs which of your forces will be placed where and in what proportions both relative to the enemy forces and to each other. The current threat from Belarus judged against other threats from other directions is really low.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They attacked from there once and they were fucked not even 100km in despite having surprise advantage. inb4 gas. Yeah, I bet only those units that were expected to assault Kyiv sold gas, and retards on the eastern/southern fronts totally didn't do the same and it wasn't just the fact that woods and marshes are terrible terrains for conducting assaults and great for defense.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Belarus is part of the enemy. They attacked from there once and there's need for a deterrent to stop them from trying again.
                In an ideal scenario maybe. In the reality of war everything is in short supply all the time. So you always have to make tradeoffs which of your forces will be placed where and in what proportions both relative to the enemy forces and to each other. The current threat from Belarus judged against other threats from other directions is really low.

                The Belarus border has been significantly fortified for a year and a half now. No vatnaggers are coming across that border quickly or quietly. Ukraine already issued a warning to Colonel Potato that any artillery, drones. missiles, etc. coming across the border will be considered an act of war no matter their origins. And, frankly, Ukraine could gut Belarus if it came to that. monke has almost nothing that can be spared in the Belarus direction, and the people of Belarus will Gaddafi Colonel Potato if he starts a war with Ukraine. They're already ready to do it, they just need a match on the powder keg to light it off.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous
        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That's their current concept for use in conflicts like Afghanistan.

          Originally it was mobile heavy fire support for air assault units playing fire brigade in the midst of WWIII. God, being part of the airborne troops on either side of a Cold War Gone Hot scenario would have been a truly special kind of hell.

  28. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Huh.
    >Pattons
    >Ypr765s
    >Challys
    >Chieftains

    .....

    Ratels (Uuuuuooooh ToT)

    West should buy a lot more from Jordan for the Ukes.

    I still say we should have scraped the bottom of the African barrel for EBRs, AMLs, T-55s and 75mm/90mm arty. If that had happened at the beginning they would have had it all by summer. Imagine AMLs with a proper twin charged power stroke diesel.

    Anyway.

  29. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    someone tell me for real if the S/KU or the X/XKA Variant is better, I understand they work on different frequencies and shit. But does it make that much of a difference?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      15 vs 13 km range

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I was more thinking of their are difference in targeting detection, sizes and accuracy

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          S / Ku would be ~ 3 / 15 Ghz
          X/ XKa would be ~ 10 / 33 Ghz
          Not sure if they work together or as individual options. If they're options, 3 would have much better penetration in adverse conditions, like rain, snow but with 10cm wavelength would need a big antenna and have considerable Fresnel zone, near field and similar effects. 10 is a popular industrial band so there's a slight chance of interference. Bu 3 isn't too far from 2.4GHz and even closer to some LTE bands.

          Anyhow for most uses i'd prefer lowest frequency that does the job as any complexity by rising frequency works mostly against you unless you gain important advantage ( like compact size ).

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i think it's fair to say that they wouldn't have changed if it wasn't an improvement worth changing for

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        thats the thing ,the dutch orders were around the same time.
        Germans used the Radars made by Simens, while the Dutch ordered ones by Phillips.
        There is no real major time difference for those orders

  30. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    LMAO, that's literally from last year. How desperate your you vatnaggers?

  31. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Do the existing gepards operate near the front lines or are they kept as part of the AA defensive system of the cities?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      AA

  32. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They should by the Jordanian Challenger 1 tanks next.
    >They got 400 of them

    Useless on the Frontline, but could equip reserve units along the Belorussian and Kharkov fronts, allowing ukies to free up better tanks for the front. They may be obsolete but in a hull-down position they could be quite the roadblock.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they fire basic bitch challenger 2 ammo as well and are as well protected as a T-72 at the very least. so probably useful on the frontline as well.
      anyhow, I thought Rheinmetall had bought a bunch for upgrading and sending to Ukraine already?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nah. Rheinmetall isn't a charity, so why would they and german government approving that would be even stranger.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I wonder if the US provided secret security assurances in exchange for this deal. Germany couldn't do that..

  33. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I thought we were only sending Ukraine our old shit, not spending a bunch of money greasing the palms of other foreign politicians? Fucking Biden at it again.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Does the US have any Gepard equivalent laying around

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That's the joke.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        historically the us just limps from one shorad stopgap to another while always scapping the dedicated projects
        M163 Vulcan>MIM-72 Chaparral> M1097 Avenger >M6 Linebacker

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Limps from one shorad stopgap to another
          I have full confidence that US/NATO airforces are unmatched in capability and quantity. But whatever the fuck happens if the airspace becomes contested. It seems like a blindspot the planners have never considered and as such no armored SPAAG or SPAAG/Point defense system was ever developped? I do have to hand it to them that Stingers and other manpads did a number on the helicopter invasion, but I still wonder how those helo's would have faired if a single Gepard would have been present near their flight path.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >But whatever the fuck happens if the airspace becomes contested.
            developing the numbers and quality of aircraft to do that would be a very visible decades-long effort

            such as what has happened with drones, and why the US is currently pursuing SHORAD with a lot of intensity and concern

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >But whatever the fuck happens if the airspace becomes contested.

            Then aliens are invading and we've got bigger issues. Part of the reason the US has such uncontested air superiority is because it doesn't spend money on cope systems when that's money that could be spent on planes instead. While there are things like adopting naval variants and slapping them on a truck for missile defense, investing heavily into developing and procuring a system who's only role is to blow things out of the sky if the USAF can't is a waste of money that could be better spent on useful capabilities. However,

            >But whatever the fuck happens if the airspace becomes contested.
            developing the numbers and quality of aircraft to do that would be a very visible decades-long effort

            such as what has happened with drones, and why the US is currently pursuing SHORAD with a lot of intensity and concern

            does bring up a good point with drones being below the scope of the USAF, which is why the US is finalizing a DEW SHORAD system to defeat drones and also provide missile defense as a side benefit. If I remember right, the prototype that's supposed to be able to mount to a JLTV is slated to be delivered before the end of the year but I haven't kept up with if it is.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >that could be better spent on useful capabilities.
              I'd argue that it would be very useful to have these types of SHORAD abilities instead of relying solely on the USAF, but that's a difference of opinion and you might be right since all military planners have canned every capability developed into that direction.
              >US is finalizing a DEW SHORAD system to defeat drones and also provide missile defense as a side benefit.
              Looks like they're already training with it at 4-60th Air Defense Artillery Regiment, they're using proxy and doing kill-chain stuff. I get the entire DEW angle, but I wonder if an autocannon or other off the shelf items wouldn't be more effective (whether in a SPAAG role or deployabel turrets).

              >how many rounds these things fire
              Wiki says this
              >It is standard to fire bursts against air targets, 24 rounds per gun for a total of 48 in limited mode and 48 rounds per gun for a total of 96 in normal mode.
              So assuming you spend 100 rounds on a single target, that's 3000 targets to defeat. Hard to tell if that's enough, but I would hope the ukies provided statistics of their ammo usage and production was planned accordingly.

              Seems like a suffcient amount in that case.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                they're doing autocannon etc shorad as well

                old picture, longbow hellfires are out for coyote 2s afaik

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I get the entire DEW angle, but I wonder if an autocannon or other off the shelf items wouldn't be more effective

                If the US was in a war, or going into a war and needed a solution right the fuck now, you could make an argument for an autocannon solution, but DEW systems are already so far along in development between the land based systems that are already into grunt's hands on the Stryker SHORAD system that they're putting through field trials to the naval systems that are starting to be rolled out that it would be a waste to spend all the money developing the system or even just buying a bunch of Gepards with the instructions in English when you look at how quickly they'd be outmoded since DEWs are going to cost a dollar per dead drone while fused autocannon shells are substantially more expensive and you have to fire a bunch of them. Even if the US was to adopt Gepards, they would likely need a hefty amount of money poured into the development and certification of a new radar system that's capable of handling the small drones though perhaps you could just steal the work that is being done for the DEW SHORAD systems.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >30mm airburst shells go brrrrr.

  34. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Gepards look like something the Imperial Guard would use to run over Eldar.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Well jetbikes should certainly not go anywhere near it.

  35. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    us shorad programs i'm aware of

    m-lids (Mobile-Low, slow, small unmanned aircraft Integrated Defeat System, fuck the army): two mraps, one with a ku-band radar and the other with a m230-derived 30mm cannon with a lot of networking c2 link-16 blah blah blah part of the larger lids family of systems blah blah blah

    madis (Marine Air Defense Integrated System): mrap with a m230, 7.62, cuppa stingers, small aesa, opto-electronic sensor

    l-madis (Light Marine Air Defense Integrated System): jammer on a go-kart, soon to be a laser on a go-kart as well

    m-shorad: stryker with a m230, 7.62, cuppa stingers and coyote 2s, few small aesas, etc

    de m-shorad: stryker with a laser

    ifpc-hpm: high energy microwave on a trailer

    and there's a lot of extended families-of-families-of-systems, all automatic integrated programmable networking open architecture flexible response blah blah blah it's hard to tell what's a system program and what's an umbrella program and what's a corporate offering

  36. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What if the first time we see the Ukes in Abrams, they're put them secretly across the dniper, have painted them tan and are crossing the desert?

    Given how fucking funny that would be, are our chances good?

  37. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Would be a nice /k/ project to bribe some south african military "officials" to persuade them to ship all their Super Hind Mk. III's. bribe them to accept an order from higher up written on a beer coaster or something.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Do the coons still have an arms industry or did that leave with the white people

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They still have one, iirc. Probably way more concerned with their power generation though.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      South Africa has a lot of Russian sympathizers and outright communists in the ANC. Not happening. After the war started many officials loudly proclaimed their anti-imperial stance and supported Russia. USA =evil empire, Russia = anti-imperialist. Yes they are that stupid.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It would be cheaper to bribe some future space scientists to sabotage whatever they can gain access to. Like, really cheap. And, you won't run out of joggers lining up to get on the payroll.

  38. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Been serving on the Roland and a few years on the Gepard afterwards before they retired. It was a lovely cat, motor was purring, reloading and cleaning was a bitch.

  39. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It sure is nice the US is buying the soon to be future AA systems for Russia when the take control of Ukraine from the West.

  40. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >only 60
    The fuck will that do

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They currently have 49, anon. And they do work quite well given the glowing reviews Ukies give.
      An additional 60 would more than double their current fleet. That's a non-trivial change.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        probably the most important thing is the extra ammo, 300k

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Isn't the ammo still sourced from Switzerland? Or did Jordan have other suppliers?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            There's a new production line in germany now.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *