US alone has spent more on Ukraine this half year than Russia spends on everything in a year.

US alone has spent more on Ukraine this half year than Russia spends on everything in a year.
What are the military implications if this?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    ya mum dildo

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >What are the military implications of this?
    Ukrainian victory

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Enough lulz to power the world

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    *Surprise farting*

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine will rebuild their military after the war with NATO weapons and Russia will be permanently locked in their own borders. There will be no more mongol rape hordes coming into Europe (and Europe includes Ukraine).

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Fantastic. I mean Russia has been dead since socialusts fricked it up 100 years ago. Sonething the US and Eurooe are in the process of doing now.
      Zelinski (who is not an ethnic Ukrainian) has said he wants Ukraine to be open borders like Germany and France and to flood Ukraine with nonEuropeans just like the globalist tech-socialist governments of US, Germany, France, Spain, etc.

      Either way, the actual indigenous peopke of the EU, Russia, Ukraine, and the founding populations of the US etc are all
      done for in less than 200 years.

      Diversity destroys unity and makes republican governmemt dysfuntional due to infighting, and that is why globalist like it, because no one can stop them from fleecing the countries.

      There will be no winners here, without a 180 degree political about face by all involved, Western civilization is done for.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Think of it as a withdrawl on an investment. The U.S. has hundreds of billions of dollars worth of stockpiled weaponry. Sending a small fraction of that to kneecap the Russians is a great fricking deal.

  7. 2 years ago
    ProudSupporterOfRussiaZ

    /k/opers are desperately trying to ignore the imminent economic collapses of america and europe

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It's just another recession, young one. They come every 10 years or so.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    A frickton of US weapons ending in the black market.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Proofs?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Gun control soon to be impossible in main land Europe

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Already got plenty of weapons shunted in from the Balkan wars.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        good

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Based. It’s mostly going to flow to the various Russian federal subjects who are going to start wars of independence after Russia finishes getting its ass kicked.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Poofs?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >unregulated gun proliferation is LE BAD
      >the government handing out full auto rifles to citizens is LE BAD

      You /misc/troon tourist types are so easy to spot kek

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Where the frick do you think we are?
      This is a literal /k/ wet dream

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It means Puccia is poor shithole, aidschughing moron.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Logistics is still king.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Wrong, Russian war in Ukraine is costing Russians $2 billion a day

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Russian defeat.

      To be fair, that number is from the first few days of the war, when they spent that much from their reserves to stabilize the falling rouble. Today they spend less.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No they haven't, they've pledged to do so. The military assistance actually delivered to Ukraine so far by the US is around $10bn. Hard to calculate the value of intelligence against the cost of shit like setting up satellites though.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    US gets to kill Russia with somebody else's hands. It's a win for them

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    US can just throw enough money to bury the world

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Some corrections: the US has promised to spend this much. Last I checked only 3-4B of equipment has actually entered Ukraine so far. Also you can assume about half to 2/3rds of this spending is going back into the MIC to replace donations to Ukraine. It should be noted that money invested in the US MIC tends to generate about a 1.6$ to 2.1$ ROI for the US. In other words. MONEY

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It means Ukraine is winning.

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I just imagine how many old American generals are just laughing their asses off at how easily and cheaply they're going to get away with taking a Ukrainian bat to Russia's knees. If they'd had to do this themselves with their own manpower it'd be 20x more expensive, but instead they can break Ukraine off a piece of their military budget and dump weapons into this and watch as Russia just constantly fricks their men and munitions into the meat grinder. Every single day I wake up and I read some new fricking stupid thing Russia has done and I'm stunned all over again; if you told me the entire Russian government was CIA operatives it could not have gone better for America.

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine will grow larger!!

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    And the Ukraine lend-lease hasn’t even begun, so far the government is still trying to spend the draw down budget (basically old equipment the military was trying to retire).

    When the lend-lease kicks in that’s when we’ll start seeing the fun stuff, like squadrons of F-16’s or fleets of Abrams being given to Ukraine. Russians has no idea what is coming.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      you do realize training and setting up infrastructure for those western equipment will take a long time for ukraine right? it would probably take at least a year for ukrainian pilots to be able to fly F16 competently, and ukrainian ground crew to a be to service F16 reliably, for example.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Good that we've been hearing rumors of Ukrainian pilots training on NATO equipment, including F-16s, for months now then

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    That's not even remotely true. But if it was, that would be humiliating and damning for the Russians. Personally, I think it's a bit embarrassing that the US is spending less on this than Afghanistan in the 80's, accounting for inflation.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Russia loses 50 years of Soviet production from a few days of US production.

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The Implication is

    VICTORY.

    We will have an ukraine-sized wiener poking into the SLAV heartlands forever

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >We will have an ukraine-sized wiener poking into the SLAV heartlands forever
      Correct. Pic related is going to be updated soon. This is how the world actually works, for you thirdies reading this.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Does make you wonder how far that 27% would fall if you removed China lol

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Or even just the Saudis and the UEA.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        20 years obsolete. We are only 10 years away from seing Europe completely removed from that picture.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Perhaps. Soros and mass immigration are ensuring population replacement in Europe and the main cities like Paris, Berlin, and London are non-European shitholes. crime ridden shit places just like American cities.

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It means that Russia cannot plausibly attrit Ukraine in the material sphere.

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    That America weapons are overprices and spend a lot of money on McDonalds and air conditioner.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      they really are, people see the 40 billion number and dont realise that its in shipments of already stockpiled weapons, vehicles, food and ammunition not cash
      everything they are sending has been laying around since the late 90s, so they get to unload all the old stock get ukraine in hyper debt and then make american tax payers fund the resupply
      all while bidets family takes in millions in backhand deals with sleazy slavs

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        40 billion is nothing, the military budget is literally 20x that. This war is the deal of a lifetime for the US

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    More American jobs.

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Not much. A lot of the money goes towards non military stuff, Ukraine has had their economy tanked.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *