Ummm...cumrades, can we sustain this?

Ummm...cumrades, can we sustain this?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dude, frick trees

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What lancets have against trees?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's an inferiority complex. IIRC Lancets haven't killed a single tree yet, only damaged them.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >TRACKED GARDEN SHED

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I honestly don’t know how they can keep this up much longer at these attrition rates. Soon they’re gonna be using skateboards to do assaults.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >You see comrade dirt-bikes are just as good if not better than IFVs, sure you trade away some protection but you gain in speed manuverability, fuel consumption and style and they are better for infiltration assaults.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >And do you know what's even better than a bike? *Slams the handlebar*

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Radical.
          But also what the frick?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's only a matter of time

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >shaka, brah!
          TZD

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I remember when "people" scoffed at Russian ifv losses, Russia will never run out of ifvs, they have infinite number of bmps.
      And now same people explain that akhually bikes are better than bmps

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Soon they’re gonna be using skateboards to do assaults.
      now we know what they mean that there's a lot a "cassettes"

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        frickssake Carlos

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I honestly don’t know how they can keep this up much longer at these attrition rates. Soon they’re gonna be using skateboards to do assaults.
      KEK

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      "do a kickflip" will get a whole new meaning

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No, but if you tell Putin you'll be shot.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Source? Can't see shit in this picture

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Source? Can't see shit in this picture
      https://x.com/AndrewPerpetua/status/1796129758087946346

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >https://x.com/AndrewPerpetua/status/1796129758087946346

        i thought this autist ragequit doing the lists?

        did he give up on his slapfight?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I thought there'd be one less person meticulously logging Russian humiliation?
          I thought ziggers were finally off the hook?

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Does this mean Russia will stop advancing ?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I mean you are a big boy, are you not? Take the confirmed hardware losses, then subtract them from the post-soviet stock, then remove a large chunk that acts as spare/duds etc. Get that remainder and figure out how long it will last at current expenditure rate.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Russia's losing old T-72s and cheap T-90Ms, while Ukraine is losing expensive Abrams and Leopards. And you know quite well that the Ukrainian economy is 10 times smaller than the Russian, so it looks that in the war of attrition Russia can sustain longer even if it continues losing equipment at this rate. Oh, and don't forget that Russia's allies - North Korea, Iran, China - don't put any stupid restrictions on Russia like "you can't use our weapons in Ukraine", and these 3 countries currently outproduce the entire West in pretty much everything, from artillery shells to missiles to IFVs, so you have to analyze it realistically when you look at tables and graphs like Andrew's.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    yes, they can sustain it, apparently. it doesn't matter if you claim 10000 tanks, 1000 radars and 5 million vatniks killed on a picture. The frontline still consistently moves in one direction - opposite of Crimea. If only you could stop an army with pictures... but no.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It is better to destroy machinery. Losing some km2 of muddy fields temporarily is a minor point.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The frontline still consistently moves in one direction

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        if only pictures could win a war...

        It is better to destroy machinery. Losing some km2 of muddy fields temporarily is a minor point.

        no plans for any counteroffensive in 2024, btw. So the "temporarily lost territories" will be lost at least until 2025, or longer. Time is relative, huh.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          If only miniscule gains could win a war...

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            > 20% of the territory is "miniscule"
            I get it you're happy it's not 40%, as it was for a few weeks at the start of the war but still...
            You win a war when the enemy has no more men to throw in the grinder. It took 4 years to grind all war capable germans during WW2 and the war in ukraine is not nearly as intense. So even as Ukraine has substantially less population than WW2 Germany, it might take some good 3-5 years before they fold.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >two more years of golf cart assaults

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Look, golf carts are a great piece of equipment. Cheap, maneuverable, harder to hit with a drone or artillery strike, they can get your troops almost anywhere, unlike MBTs or IFVs or even trucks. They accomplish exactly what they were
                (re-)purposed for, and if they help you win, who cares if they look funny or something?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >harder to hit with a drone or artillery strike
                but that's where you're utterly wrong, you fricking moron

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                My daily dose of Russians dying. That's a USSR flag by the way.

                https://i.imgur.com/vaBn899.jpeg

                >And do you know what's even better than a bike? *Slams the handlebar*

                Radical.
                But also what the frick?

                I've seen a Ukrainian UAV video of a Russian on a scooter but so far no actual attacks on them. Waiting for one so we can do Tony Hawk jokes.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >we didnt need our soviet inheritance or refining capabilities
              >we wanted to be chinas junior partner

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >You win a war when the enemy has no more men to throw in the grinder.
              So that means Ukraine is on track to winning the war, given they are continously inflicting casualties upon the Russians at a rate higher than the population disparity between Ukraine and Russia, meaning Russia will run out of men first.

              Also, equipment, motherfricker. Russias gonna run out of tanks, AFVs, artillery pieces etc. far faster than men. And if they try to keep fighting without that, their casualty rates are gonna skyrocket into the millions and then tens of millions really fricking fast. No Led-Lease to save your asses and carry you to victory this time around, pidor.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >20%
              It's closer to 15%, moron.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Manpower doesn't really matter when one side straight up can't field equipment in number anymore. Ukraine has the backing of basically the entire planet, even if that backing is kept at a trickle. Russia doesn't.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          If pictures would win a war, russia would still be losing as they have no victories to publish.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >if only pictures could win a war...
          ...Russia wouldn't be losing quite as catastrophically.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >we didn't NEED 150,000 men, over 3000 tanks, and we planned to be bogged down in an unwinnable war with slow moving stagnant front lines

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        > unwinnable
        It's quite winnable. Just not as fast and easy as they hoped for. War of attrition sucks but Russia is better prepared than Ukraine.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          For one, sending thousands of men to die in frontal assaults means you have already "lost" because your society is completely failed if it gets to that point. Second, Ukraine can get thousands more vehicles while Russia is relying upon their aging and depleted stocks, and Chinese ATVs or motorbikes now. It is Russia who is going to run out of material first.

          The rise of cheap chinese vehicles on the front seems to be the first signs of cracks before Russia will literally be out of enough material to engage in assaults.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            > Ukraine can get thousands more vehicles
            May I see them? May I see the soldiers that will operate them? I'll wait.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Well we literally have multiple threads on them for one

              [...]

              And yes, they have some manpower issues and will need to mobilize more.

              If Ukraine can get some kind of parity in their airspace with planes, a whole lot of stuff like armoured columns, foot infantry and artillery won't be worth a pinch of shit
              It'll more importantly mean the allied countries can dip into a pretty deep pool of things that get strapped up to an F16 which they have a frickload of, unlike say 155mm shells which are a part of doctrine, but not so much like dominating airspace and blowing Black folk up with JDAMS is in western war fighting

              Yes, F-16s will be a godsend and help out a lot to push Russian air power back.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >pwease show me positions pwease
              Just look here, look at all the snowgerian losses. That ratio doesnt come from nowhere baljeet

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                > look at my made up numbers!
                why bother? ukies can't even attack this year, no matter how many imaginary tanks they destroy.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >imaginary tanks
                Armatas are in Ukraine?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                yes, and they're all destroyed! absolutely unsustainable!

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                All 10 of them??? How horrible!!!! Someone should inform the Tzar!!!

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Joke's on you these shit are much cooler than the armatas

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'M BUUUUUURNING UP FOR YOU

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Damn that's some Black Napalm level hot fricking burn there senpai

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Ok, please show me your full soviet stockpiles, im sure nothing has happened to drain them to a level that matches this day on day rate of loss, you absolute brownoid.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >look at my proven numbers, backed up by meticulously collated hard evidence
                FTFY. Seethe more about it, pidor.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                > hard evidence
                > destroyed: tree
                tree is pretty hard, evidently. now we count even the trees as ukrainian soldiers because why not. Solid factology.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >made up numbers
                OP’s pic is of visually confirmed losses. It even has the timestamps in one of the right columns if you want to check them against the Telegram vids or whatever, you absolute donkey.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              You are seeing them. Western MICs are still jsut ramping up evne as Russian production is stagnating and collapsing. And in regards to manpwoer, Russia is running out faster than Ukraine, both in total and per-capita terms.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            If Ukraine can get some kind of parity in their airspace with planes, a whole lot of stuff like armoured columns, foot infantry and artillery won't be worth a pinch of shit
            It'll more importantly mean the allied countries can dip into a pretty deep pool of things that get strapped up to an F16 which they have a frickload of, unlike say 155mm shells which are a part of doctrine, but not so much like dominating airspace and blowing Black folk up with JDAMS is in western war fighting

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >For one, sending thousands of men to die in frontal assaults means you have already "lost" because your society is completely failed if it gets to that point.
            Look bro, I wish this were true and I wish we lived in a universe where Russia's collapse is imminent and Putin is considering shooting his tiny brains out, but in reality Russian society is still mostly rallying round the flag and counting on winning this 3-day special military operation of Putin's. 30k people are still VOLUNTARILY enlisting for the Russian army every month, and that's more than Russia needs and can supply right now, while Ukraine is having trouble mobilizing even 100k soldiers at once, despite the fact that Ukrainian soldiers are paid slightly more ($5-7k a month compared to Russia's $3-4k a month), and almost all major cities' streets are empty now that the new mobilization law has been signed, because most men are dodging the draft. No, this is not just a Russian psyop, unfortunately, even trusted Ukrainian sources such as Ukrajinśka Pravda or Babeľ report this.
            There is no need to be defeatist just yet, but what is happening now is rather concerning. Ukraine does not have enough troops, munitions and equipment to secure and hold the current front lines indefinitely, I'm not even starting about the liberation occupied territories, and Western aid continues to be limited by internal disagreements in the EU and US establishment. At the same time, Russia's Axis of Evil allies continue to supply it with the weapons and materials it needs to continue this war of attrition. Unless the West comes to its senses and realizes that the war in Ukraine is not just some local meaningless conflict somewhere far from home, but part of a larger existential conflict over the future of humanity, there is a high risk that the forces of totalitarianism and anti-liberalism will prevail over freedom and democracy.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              This is why the kharkiv offensiev was such a resounding success lol

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's not a success yet, but now Russia controls half of Vovčanśk and has been able to force Ukraine to move some of its troops from the south and east, potentially limiting the AFU ability to defend Kupjanśk, Časiv Jar and the Hrodivka-Novohrodivka-Pokrovśk agglomeration if Putin orders a major offensive there.
                Underestimating the enemy is much worse than overestimating him. The Ukrainians and their allies cannot afford to repeat the Russians' mistake in 2022, because the price will be much higher than what Russians paid back then.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Will the gloves finally come off and everyone will understand everything? Also
                >yet
                kek

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                We have reserves and will be sending a trickle of Abrams which would make them break even. Leopard 2A's are admittedly a bigger problem as we really should start up production of those again and at least ensure that Ukraine replaces the ones they lost.

                [...]
                Ukraine has problems, but Russia has worse with more unsustainable losses. Ukraine will need another major armament program and to mobilize. I can't see any way out other than 100-200K temp foreign workers, plus mobilizing hundreds of thousands of men.

                Never under-estimate your enemy, and Russia is a huge formiddable foe but I am confident Ukraine can outlast them.

                >and has been able to force Ukraine to move some of its troops from the south and east
                By moving it's own troops from south and east
                >if Putin orders a major offensive there.
                Everything but 10k troops in Kursk are already engaged, do you think ordering "major offensive" magically gives troops, that are already attacking 24/7, boost?

                I wish I and my internet friends from Ukraine were as optimistic as you are, but I'm sure you guys are underestimating the determination of Putin and his circle to put an end to the "Ukrainian problem" as they see it. And as long as Russia has allies who continue to supply it with ammunition and equipment, and as long as its brainwashed population is eager to fight as if this is a new Great Patriotic War and genuinely believes they are fighting the same Nazis and Banderites their grandfathers fought, it's hard to see how Ukraine can pull off a victory here if its Western allies continue to delay aid packages, and its people, some of whom are influenced by Russia's Telegram psyops and others are just plain tired of war, are not as enthusiastic about enlisting and fighting for their country and nation as they were 2 years ago. I don't want to be a doomer, but I talk to Ukrainians quite often and read Ukrainian social media from time to time, and it's quite obvious that many of them are 1) tired of the war and want it to end ASAP even if that means Ukraine never gets back most of the territories currently occupied by Russia 2) are starting to blame the West more and more for the delays in arms deliveries 3) are quite pessimistic about their government's ability to successfully run the country during martial law.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Very nice example of concern trolling, have a (you)

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Coo sotry, pidor. Won't change that the ukrainian people remnian overwhelmingly in favour of continuing the war to total victory, though. Nor that Ruswsia is losing it, and that all Putins "determination" is achieving is to maximise the amount of death and devastation Russia will suffer. Hopefully, he will remain "determined" all the way to total national collapse, so we'll be rid of the vatBlack person problem for a couple generations at least.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                last time you got rid of the Russian problem you spent 30 years in Iraq and Afghanistan, doing jack shit. Don't get me started on the "zoomer" generation. I pray every day that Russia doesn't collapse again.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're that IntelCat or AngryUkrainianCat guy.
                TL;DR we must of the surrender, it is a hopeless
                Putin stronk AND scary

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The only real issue is that Ukraine's government is shit and moronic, and western allies are being cucks.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >and has been able to force Ukraine to move some of its troops from the south and east
                By moving it's own troops from south and east
                >if Putin orders a major offensive there.
                Everything but 10k troops in Kursk are already engaged, do you think ordering "major offensive" magically gives troops, that are already attacking 24/7, boost?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >but now Russia controls half of Vovčanśk
                >3km from border
                >time elapsed: 18 days

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's a Feint 2.0 you dumb wectern homosexual!

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Vovčanśk
                You will never be albanian.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What does Albania have to do with it? Vovčanśk is a direct Latinization of Ukrainian Boвчaнcьк.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Russian society is still mostly rallying around the flag
              The impression I get is that they're mostly trying to keep their heads down.
              But are patriotic for a camera.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Fricking women man.
                >hurr sometimes I have to walk around and spend money
                What a fricking tragedy. Who makes the money huh? Love from Kazakhstan.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What the FRICK is the deal with soviets and turquoise

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                even their local version of povidone is turquoise

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The Novikov solution is just brilliant green dye and nitrocellulose dissolved in alcohol.
                Pretty good at treating big scrapes and road rash on dumb kids.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It was on sale

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Ukrainian soldiers are paid slightly more ($5-7k a month compared to Russia's $3-4k a month),
              Please have a nice day. AFU doesn't pay even $3k per month to those who are on the frontline. Those outside frontlines are paid even less. That's kind of an issue btw, it would be easier to just pay people to get enlisted, instead of mobilizing them, but Ukraine doesn't have any money for that.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              > and almost all major cities' streets are empty now that the new mobilization law has been signed
              Absolutely not true. Visit Ukraine, see it for yourself.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                > visit Ukraine
                How about no. I'd rather not risk it because I'm in recruitment age.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Afraid of being press-ganged into the Zelensky Afrika korps? KWAB.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Ukraine is having trouble mobilizing even 100k soldiers at once
              They straight up told me they have an excess of volunteers and to sit on a wait list.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >we WANTED to be snowier north korea

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Being a Chink resource colony is actually a win!
            t. vatniks

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The question is: what do we do with China, now that we provided it with a resource colony for fricking free. Count on a burger to shoot himself in the knee.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                We trade

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Wait for china to attack russia for manchuria and laugh? Or wait for china to burn millions and a navy at taiwan and laugh?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                it'll be the kind of laugh you did when you were leaving Afghanistan (out of boredom, it was a solid win, you didn't lose at all).

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >mentioning Afghanistan of all places
                you stupid Black person

                vatnik, there is no victory waiting for Russia at the end of this shitshow. the Soviet Union collapsed mere 2 years after the Soviet–Afghan War, and Russia is now walking that same path, step by step

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous
              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                and the funny thing is that the US is still here all while the Soviet Union is now only exist in Putin's wet dream

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Nice whataboutism, im sure theres no whataboutism about russias afghanistan experience to pull here. Perhaps one that absolutely shattered a russian empire. Or how the current situation is orders of magnitudes worse for russia dispite having less resources than the ussr.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >conquer a country
                >dont make it a colony
                >dont eliminate hostile populace
                >try to set up government ran by hostile populace
                >leave said government
                really the only wonder is why we tried after step 1, should have just done the conquering, and fricked off

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I wonder what does the word "conquer" mean in your tiny brain?
                What exactly did you "conquer" and why? What did you get out of it? Why did you leave?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >conquer
                killed brown people and deposed the government. that's it. people don't like to say it but that was the point of iraq and afghanistan. 9/11 was an embarrassment and america needed to kick the shit out of someone close enough to being responsible to make the idea of doing it again something they didn't want to do. using it to buoy the economy through the crashes and recessions was just a bonus.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                > killed brown people
                Afghanistan population before the american invasion: 20 millions
                Afghanistan population after the american invasion: 40 millions
                > deposed the government
                government before invasion: taliban
                government after invasion: taliban

                Implessive work there, chump. You totally boosted your economy by spending 2,5 trillion in the afghani mountains, too. truly implessive!

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you're not wrong that they could 'win' the war, but if you bleed yourself until every neighbor you have starts taking bites out of your territory and resources, i think the victory will be quite hollow.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          At best, a pyrrich victory. At worst, USSR collapse v2: electric Boogaloo

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            > unwinnable
            It's quite winnable. Just not as fast and easy as they hoped for. War of attrition sucks but Russia is better prepared than Ukraine.

            France, Poland, and Baltics have said they will step in if Ukraine's front lines collapse which is them setting a "red line" and saying Russia will never gain the major cities ever again. If you project equipment losses and financial strains, they have 18-24 months before things get very bad. What if the Russian economy collapses and Russia has no vehicles left at the same time?

            Ukraine can sit and chip away at Russian defenses while Russia can do nothing. Russia would be forced to slowly withdraw more and more until they get to the god damn border.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              oh noes, not France, anyone but France!
              pfhahahaha.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If soldiers and equipment from the Baltics and Poland are backed up by French air power you will see a fraction of NATO's military capacity unfold and Russian forces would be stopped dead in their tracks. russia is never going to gain hold of any major Ukrainian city.

                Putin knows the time is up, which is why he made a mad dash to Kharkiv, but that's been bogged down. That only resulted in allies okay'ing the use of HIMARS, ATTACMS and possibly cruise missiles for use in Russia proper. All the baseses in Belgorod are going to be gone in a month's time.

                There is no path to victory for Russia, and their only strategy is sending thousands of slaves to die to Ukrainian weaponry.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                > gone in a month's time.
                didn't you mean two weeks? come on, say it!
                France can totally crush Russia in two weeks, pfffhahaha. And the mighty baltic army of 5 000 soldiers total. Putin is so dead, kek.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >please kill us in 2 weeks! We'd save so much face after getting stomped by europes poorest country
                Grim

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >France, Poland, and Baltics have said they will step in if Ukraine's front lines collapse which is them setting a "red line"
              hey idiot, not even a pro russian, just someone who sees geopolitics realistically, they wont do shit, if the governments of Europe and the US actually want to keep Russian boots off Ukrainian soil, they would have done so much more, like, i dont know, substantially increase the amount of military aid they send ASAP?, instead of squabbling around each other because believe it or not, nations, west or east have their own self-interests first and foremost and will not stick their neck out for another country this much

              if, IF Russia stumbles their way into winning, all the West will do is throw their hands up and say some strong condemnations before forgetting about this whole Ukrainian business, nobody will come and avenge the Ukrainians who needlessly died for this, this is not a fricking marvel movie, but cold, hard geopolitics at play here

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i mean what's more likely then is that ukraine becomes a quagmire of insurgency because there's no way to stop that at this point. the broader west moves on, and no doubt some fraction of poland continues to funnel weapons to dudes driving drones around living innawoods. poland at that point would be served by an insurgency being as painful and resource-consuming as possible, if only to ensure that russia doesn't get the idea that it should push its luck any further.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The longer this war takes, the worst it is for the prospects of the old European gas cash cow for Russia.
          Qatar and North Africa are probably rubbing their hands as Russians keep shooting their foot.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >War of attrition sucks but Russia is better prepared than Ukraine.

          better prepared to take massive losses simply because they have a larger population ? way too simplistic, since it ignores the economic aspect, ignores also that ukraine is fighting for it's very survival while russia is simply following putin's fricked up and fantasy based imperialist bullshit - yeah, russians believe all the propaganda so far, are more than willing to get greased for pay, but that's only going to work for so long...
          commitment to seeing russia defeated is total at this point, will only increase given the investment already made - sure, putin made an investment also, he stands to lose everything because of his fricked up plan, but that isn't a guarantee for success on it's own. i think russia lost years ago, that time is running out for putin, that eventually we'll see his head on a stick...

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >but Russia is better prepared than Ukraine
          So why is Russia objectively losing the war of attrition?

          > math looks like on Ukrainian side
          next counteroffensive when?

          Whenever Ukraine wants. Probably after BMPs and T-62s become functionally extinct on the russian side. Ukraine's got all the time, pidor. Every day, they get stronger. Every day, Russia gets weaker. And there's nothing you can do to stop it. All you can do is cope and seethe, while the clock ticks down on Russian military collapse through attrition. Tick tock.

          last time you got rid of the Russian problem you spent 30 years in Iraq and Afghanistan, doing jack shit. Don't get me started on the "zoomer" generation. I pray every day that Russia doesn't collapse again.

          >I pray every day that Russia doesn't collapse again.
          Of course you do, pidor. Won't stop it though. Then again, chances are you're gonna get mobilised and will be fertilizing ukrainian fields by then. So don't worry about it. 🙂

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >BMPs and T-62s
            Pretty irrelevant for any counteroffensives. The Ukies need to work on continuing their total artillery and radar death campaigns, so they can cover their units clearing minefields with air power

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >but Russia is better prepared than Ukraine
              So why is Russia objectively losing the war of attrition?

              [...]
              Whenever Ukraine wants. Probably after BMPs and T-62s become functionally extinct on the russian side. Ukraine's got all the time, pidor. Every day, they get stronger. Every day, Russia gets weaker. And there's nothing you can do to stop it. All you can do is cope and seethe, while the clock ticks down on Russian military collapse through attrition. Tick tock.

              [...]
              >I pray every day that Russia doesn't collapse again.
              Of course you do, pidor. Won't stop it though. Then again, chances are you're gonna get mobilised and will be fertilizing ukrainian fields by then. So don't worry about it. 🙂

              Ukraine unironically needs the allies to stop cucking out with "muh escalation". It's better for AFU to capture Belgorod, Kursk and such and swap them for Melitopol and Mariupol, instead of attacking prepared positions in the south.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            > Russia gains more land every week
            > objectively losing
            pick one

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >US gains more land in Afghanistan and Vietnam
              >it won those wars

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Germany is winning

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                At that point of time, it was. Germany only lost when the anglos hit it's soft (french) rear.

                >US gains more land in Afghanistan and Vietnam
                >it won those wars

                US won both Vietnam and Afghanistan. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. And even if it lost, it was the smart thing to do. We didn't need them anyway.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                u wot
                Germany lost the Battle of Moscow in '42 and Stalingrad in '43
                D-Day was in '44

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the map is from 41', tho.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So what "anglos hitting the french rear" happened after 41 but before they lost in Moscow in 42?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                that's the point. at 41' Germany was winning.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                And you said they were winning until 44 which they clearly weren't cause they were getting kicked out of Russia long before that
                But sure go ahead and backpedal some more after accidentally saying something incredibly stupid

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                reading comprehension: zero

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Operation Astrakan
                Operation Sunstar
                Operation Anklet
                Operation Curfew
                What anon forgot was that they were raids and the brits came back home after a couple hours

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >At that point of time, it was.
                Nah, it was a stupid and desperate gamble and they were operating on borrowed time since day one.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                hindsight is 20/20

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Not really, they were operating on a delusion that capitulating France would have UK go for a peace treaty, which didn't happen. They didn't have a solution for that, they didn't think about that happening. Everything else was a reaction bullshit.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                yes, really. now we have information collected from entire world for decades with analysis and shit. back in the days they didn't have internet and satellites.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Not having someone ask a question "what if they won't go for the peace treaty after France falls? maybe we should have a plan B for that?" isn't some hurr-durr hindsight 2020 crap.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Would surely have helped if they had wiped out the Brits at Dunkirk instead of letting the troops wait and the Brits sailing away.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >another 10k kia to take the frontyard too vasily

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            November.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >It's quite winnable.
          Theoretically true, but that would require a complete shift in tactics, strategy, and logistics in order to make it possible, and considering how despite the many leadership changes in the Russian military that have happened these past two years haven't affected these in the slightest (or debatedly made them even worse) I think it's safe to assume that the Russian government, as an institution, is simply incapable of bring about the necessary changes.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >yes, they can sustain it, apparently.
      They visibly can't, though, given the continual degradation and equally visible depletion of stockpiles.

      >muh frontline moves
      At such rate, it'll take Russia the rest of the century and another 90 million KIA mobiks to make it to Kyiv.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      vatnik, there is no victory waiting for Russia at the end of this shitshow. the Soviet Union collapsed mere 2 years after the Soviet–Afghan War, and Russia is now walking that same path, step by step

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        t. historylet
        This war is nothing like Afghanistan. Neither the soviet nor the murican version.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          this war will end the same, with the Russian running back home with their tail between their legs. there is no victory waiting for them

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            two more weeks. well, maybe more.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              yeah 2 more weeks until Ukraine frontline collapse

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >from 3 days to kiev to 3 years to maybe russia wont disintegrate today
              Bleak

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                🙂

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i'm baffled at the morons utter confidence in a Russian victory. anyone with a brain and a little knowledge on history and warfare know that there is no winning this shitshow for Russia
                >we will take all of Donbas and Ukraine will be forced to surrender
                like how? why? do they really think that Ukraine will just stop like that? do they really think that they could just sit in a trench and scream "cease fire" at their enemy? what stoping Ukraine from just shelling anything they could in the region? really what is their fricking plan after they, somehow, magically take the Donbas?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, its way worse for russia

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah it's many times worse. Russia lost 20k men and 150 tanks in Afghanistan.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            At least they didn't kill quite as many civilians this time around

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              the israelites picked up the slack in Gaza

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      All of this crap is geolocated + picture. They don't count the twitter kills.
      They also do it with "hohol" loses

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    where are the photos? you expect us to take just your b***h word as truth?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >where are the photos?
      If only there was a source in the OP, and such source could be used to query a search engine, and if only one of the very first results offered exactly the origin of such claims
      If only the origin of such claims also attached a link to every single one of them, redirecting your browser to a video/image substantiating the claim!
      >inb4 link
      No, it is high time you learn how to google, anon. OP's pic literally tells you WHO is compiling the list.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why are ziggers and poos so fricking moronic? The twitter link has been posted above, you click on it and there's all of the links to each of those losses. I sometimes wonder if these people can eat without their carers cutting their food first

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      [...]

      seethe/cope & dial8
      http://losses.ukrdailyupdate.com

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >YOU MOTHER b***h BLOODY BASTARD BLOODY
      heh

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    so what? oinkraine lost leopard and abrahams ))

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Westfallen

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So do we have a chart on the MT-LB burn? There must be a possibility to estimate the time when all we will be facing will be Chinese made golf carts.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://x.com/Jonpy99/status/1776567111755628867

      twitter autists gotchu

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That is a fricking crazy amount of armour loss, its a really slap-dash mix of shit too from every BMP variety to whatever model tank can be gotten running
    Almost like in 2022 when they managed to dunk entire BTG's into a river because bridges are hard

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    tree means decoy you morons

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >F-16s aren't even being used right now
    >long range missiles still haven't been used on Russia's territory
    >artillery ammo hasn't yet fully arrived
    >these results
    I think I'm going to like what happens next.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's 3:1 trades, but it means Ukrainians are dying every day in currently unsustainable numbers. They need to mobilize a few hundred thousand to win.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        OP doesn't look like 3:1 to me.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >no "fell in a hole" this week
    aww man

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >they finally have a metodichka for the Chinese golf carts

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >1 Abrams and 1 Leopard
    Thats all shitskins need to say they won, they don't care how many die they absolutely must rectify the sever asspain they receive from western equipment existing.

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's nice that Russian propagandists are quite daft and pretend that flooding English-speaking comment boxes with the idea of Ukrainian draft dodging is ever going to amount to much. Sounds like a good usage of Russian money. Keep it up.

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The Leotard and Abrahamster are worth more than all of that vatBlack person rubbish combined, THOUGH.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      We have reserves and will be sending a trickle of Abrams which would make them break even. Leopard 2A's are admittedly a bigger problem as we really should start up production of those again and at least ensure that Ukraine replaces the ones they lost.

      >For one, sending thousands of men to die in frontal assaults means you have already "lost" because your society is completely failed if it gets to that point.
      Look bro, I wish this were true and I wish we lived in a universe where Russia's collapse is imminent and Putin is considering shooting his tiny brains out, but in reality Russian society is still mostly rallying round the flag and counting on winning this 3-day special military operation of Putin's. 30k people are still VOLUNTARILY enlisting for the Russian army every month, and that's more than Russia needs and can supply right now, while Ukraine is having trouble mobilizing even 100k soldiers at once, despite the fact that Ukrainian soldiers are paid slightly more ($5-7k a month compared to Russia's $3-4k a month), and almost all major cities' streets are empty now that the new mobilization law has been signed, because most men are dodging the draft. No, this is not just a Russian psyop, unfortunately, even trusted Ukrainian sources such as Ukrajinśka Pravda or Babeľ report this.
      There is no need to be defeatist just yet, but what is happening now is rather concerning. Ukraine does not have enough troops, munitions and equipment to secure and hold the current front lines indefinitely, I'm not even starting about the liberation occupied territories, and Western aid continues to be limited by internal disagreements in the EU and US establishment. At the same time, Russia's Axis of Evil allies continue to supply it with the weapons and materials it needs to continue this war of attrition. Unless the West comes to its senses and realizes that the war in Ukraine is not just some local meaningless conflict somewhere far from home, but part of a larger existential conflict over the future of humanity, there is a high risk that the forces of totalitarianism and anti-liberalism will prevail over freedom and democracy.

      Ukraine has problems, but Russia has worse with more unsustainable losses. Ukraine will need another major armament program and to mobilize. I can't see any way out other than 100-200K temp foreign workers, plus mobilizing hundreds of thousands of men.

      Never under-estimate your enemy, and Russia is a huge formiddable foe but I am confident Ukraine can outlast them.

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Clearly they can because it has been like this for two years now.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      lmao closing your eyes and hoping for the best huh?
      what about next year? and the next? and the next? how long does Russia intend to keep going with their Soviet stock dwindling

      https://i.imgur.com/G8winsx.jpeg

      >yes, they can sustain it, apparently.
      They visibly can't, though, given the continual degradation and equally visible depletion of stockpiles.

      >muh frontline moves
      At such rate, it'll take Russia the rest of the century and another 90 million KIA mobiks to make it to Kyiv.

      , their economy suffering from heavy sanctions and their military spending taking up the majority of their GDP, just like the Soviet Union before their collapse?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        China will save them

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          and how is China going to save Russia? pouring trillion of dollars into this blackhole? how are they going to rebuild Russia's atrophied industry? how are they going to prevent corruption from wasting their money? is Xi going to run 2 countries at the same time? what about both nations demographic problem? how is Xi going to make women breed more?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >how is Xi going to make women breed more?
            China got a male surplus while russia got a female surplus. Every day 1000+ more young russian men are turned into fertilizer. Supporting russia just enough to keep this going for a few more years and making russia fully dependent on Chinese mercy could be clever plan to fix Chinese demographics.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              You could kill every man in Russia, and ship all the women to China, and China would still have 30 million surplus men.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >and how is China going to save Russia?
            replacing all money flowing to Moscow with all money flowing to Beijing

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          people forget that while USA is investing in its ukrainian proxy to prevent its total defeat, China is taking their sweet time using Russia as proxy, too.
          Ukraine gets abrams, F16, bradleys, himars, etc.
          Russia gets... golf carts and cheap radios. And still pushes forward, the mad lads.
          China is clearly better at 5D chess here, getting cheap resources by the billions while doing next to nothing for their proxy.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >from multipolar world to Chinaman please save me in two years
          Implessive

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Anon do you know how math works?If you have 10000 of something and lose 2000 every year you will eventually run out.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        not if you produce 2500 every year and you import 1500 more.
        Math doesn't work in Ukraine's favor, anon. Unless they somehow import soldiers (like real soldiers, not plebbit volunteer squads) and get more gibs.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >not if you produce 2500 every year and you import 1500 more.
          Examples?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >not if you produce 2500 every year and you import 1500 more
          considering Russia produces about 200 new tanks and 300 new bmps per year and imports 0, math looks like on Ukrainian side

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            > math looks like on Ukrainian side
            next counteroffensive when?

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Right after they'll run out of men (two weeks)

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >considering Russia produces about 200 new tanks
            They do not. Not a single serially produced new tank chassis got made after 90s. All of the "newly produced" tanks are modernization of old stocks. The only truly newly produced tanks were the 11 or so T-14s made during the last decade, which were hand-made prototypes.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >not if you produce 2500 every year and you import 1500 more.
          Which Russia doesn't.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >somehow import soldiers (like real soldiers, not plebbit volunteer squads)
          My homie

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >not if you produce 2500 every year and you import 1500 more.
          Neither of which Russia is capable of. The math undeniably and visibly is working in Ukraines favour. The old soviet stockpiles are vanishing, and soon will be gone. And there's nothing Russia has to substitute, let alone replace them with. They're already scraping the barrel with shit like the golfcarts and motorbikes.

          >soldiers
          There it is working even more in Ukraines favour. At current casualty rates, Ukraine will exterminate the entire male population of Russia well before running truly short on manpower themselves. And casualty rates will only become even more in favour of Ukraine as russian equipment shortages intensify, forcing you pidors to substitute more manpower for your increasingly lacking firepower.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            wishful thinking, the post

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              meant for

              not if you produce 2500 every year and you import 1500 more.
              Math doesn't work in Ukraine's favor, anon. Unless they somehow import soldiers (like real soldiers, not plebbit volunteer squads) and get more gibs.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >The old soviet stockpiles are vanishing, and soon will be gone
            Depending on the quality of crap that is still left, the industrial bottlenecks in refurbishing and the pace of usage it might be enough for 2 years more for some types of weapons, such as tanks.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yes lose 5 t90 and replace with 5 golf cars. Solid plan

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Bros, they finally hit it...

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Jet Ski
    What will be the next powersports vehicle that Russia sends to war?

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >576x1280
    >jpg
    Are all shills this braindead when they spam?

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >check how shit is going and if Russia is still embarrassing itself
    >Immediately see a vid of them assaulting their own trenches

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Immediately see a vid of them assaulting their own trenches
      What?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        footage was posted to r/combatfootage today of the russians assaulting a trench that appears to be on thier own lines

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >assaulting a trench that appears to be on thier own lines

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            ripping the video now, gimme five and i'll get the parts uploading, haven't watched the full thing so we'll see what it actually looks like. can confirm the presence of a strange tan shed

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/dU3UUKp.jpeg

      >assaulting a trench that appears to be on thier own lines

      Part 1, going to have to split it up into 3.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Part 2, I personally can't well identify who it is the troops are assaulting yet, so frick if I know if the title is accurate.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          so, dudes assault a trench, take the trench, maybe it's themselves? maybe not? i dont know if i trust someone posting to r/combatfootage to know for sure or not, it's in Novomykhailivka if anyones autistic enough to know who holds what trenches there. wanted the footage at least to be here for any anons who wanted to take a gander.

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    warning: rant

    /k/, for some reason, collectively believes that the war has now been decided in favor of a Ukrainian victory, and that once Russia loses enough men and equipment, it will now totally collapse a la USSR in 1991, when no, that is absolutely not the case when you're reading what's going on in the battlefield, hearing all these reports of lack of manpower and delayed military aid because the west is way too busy pussyfooting around and focusing on their own domestic issues

    yes, if you look at the numbers, Russia is obviously losing more compared to Ukraine, but here's the key, THEY CAN DO ATTRITION FOR MUCH LONGER THAN UKRAINE, why do you think they have been complaining nonstop about the insufficient levels of aid they're getting from the west, is it not because it's their lifeline to staying in the fight, why is nobody in this board acknowledging this fact?, why do you all think this situation is all well and good, when being complacent is one of the most surefire ways into the path of defeat?

    before all of you dismiss my ranting as just vatnik shilling or whatever, I'm stating that i DO actually want to see this country win, i do want to see Russia take a colossal L after too many years of not being told to sit the frick down, the reality is, NATO is not doing enough to support Ukraine, and now they're in the backfoot and on the defense for the time being because of that, lets all leave neverland and discuss what's happening in this war in a genuinely realistic lens instead of being another fricking circlejerk

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >hearing all these reports of lack of manpower and delayed military aid because the west is way too busy pussyfooting around and focusing on their own domestic issues

      Old copy pasta Black person. israelitelensky himself said that for the first time, all the units on the frontline have all the ammo they need. Imagine him saying that shit lol

      Also US has been rapid-firing multi-billion aid packages since they approved the law. Ukraine will have more Bradleys than they ever did in a few weeks (if not already)

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      problem is Murica has the attention span of half presidency mandate. While EU is fricked in the ass by the war and doesn't like it in the slightest.
      ukrainians? nobody cares about them even if they fight to the last man. Their own fault of believing Boris Johnson and demented uncle Joe.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >vatnig seething about brits
        Tale as old as time

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >EU is fricked in the ass
        you mean Germany
        Sorry sister, France and Sweden and Denmark and the Netherlands and Belgium will keep giving Ukraine weapons

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          soon there'll be no ukrainian soldiers to use those weapons, tho. they already recruit the kids and the elderly. with demographics worse than russia's (an accomplishment of its own) and refugees in the millions it's either Makron sends EU troops for real or gg, no re.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You've been saying that for the last 3 years.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >or gg, no re.
            In two more weeks, correct?

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              not really. 2 more years, more like. in the meanwhile we'll see if the F-16 will change anything. At this rate of attrition, next year they'll decrease the recruitment age from 23 to 21. In 2026, they'll decrease it from 21 to 19. Which will be about game over.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The most important thing in all this is Russia keeps on believing this

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >once Russia loses enough men and equipment, it will now totally collapse a la USSR in 1991
      Nobody is saying that, but it would be nice if it happened. Everybody is counting on them eventually fricking off.
      >THEY CAN DO ATTRITION FOR MUCH LONGER THAN UKRAINE
      Let's see how that works for them in practice.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >THEY CAN DO ATTRITION FOR MUCH LONGER THAN UKRAINE
      Can they do it longer than the collective west though?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Getting in a money spaffing fight with the USA, who own basically all the money? I'm sure they'll be fine. I wouldn't worry about it.

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    at least post the real file and not a shitty screenshot

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Can anyone who is not a shill explain to me how Ukraine losing multiple of their tanks which they cannot replenish at all is sustainable while Russia makes hundreds of tanks a year? Eventually the scales will tip and Ukraine will have nothing left.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >while Russia makes hundreds of tanks a year
        Makes != refurbishes.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The point is that Russia has the will to kill itself to win this war, while Ukraine has faltering allies. There comes a point where one side runs out of steel, and it will be Ukraine at this rate.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            nice zigger cope

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >please forget the 60 billion dollar package
            >please forget the EU aid package
            Not even the 'jeets have redeemed for Russia.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >302 IFVs (PBV 302) from sweden on the way
              >61 already pledged f16s just waiting to finish training (from norway and netherlands)
              >belgium just pledged 30 F16s to be sent to ukraine in addition, nearly 100 f16s total
              >new us security deal on horizon
              >france to deploy military forces to train units inside ukraine ((totally will just be only instructors, don't worry))
              >sweden sending 2 ewac airplanes (valuable as frick)

              ziggers are throwing everything they got, why do you think they're freaking out about kharkiv front now causing gaps they can exploit?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Russia has the will to kill itself to win this war
            If that was the case, they'd mobilize 3 million pidors back in 2022, after they understood that their plan failed, and bumrush on foot

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Russia has the will to kill itself to win this war
            If you have a nice day you lose tho

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              If you are in Russia, you win when you have a nice day.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >cannot replenish
        They haven't even received all the Leos being promised
        >But what happens if that ran ou-
        More gibs

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Damn I miss early war spaghetti. Mamma mia!!

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I love how the map scale is slightly larger on the left. :^)

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Russia loses about ~4 tanks for every Ukrainian tank. While Ukraine gets modern tanks in smaller rates from the West, Russia gets shittier and shittier refurbished tanks because they can't actually make enough brand new tanks to sustain their losses.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Russia loses more tanks because they actually use them on the front instead of entrenched infantry and they still manage to lose some
          Ukraine has not attacked in a year and they already lost like half of all their western armor

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            They're receiving another 100 Bradleys alone with the new aid package, that's more than they've lost in the past year

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            When you ammo rack a T-72 it launches the turret and burns to a crisp. When you ammo rack a Leo 2 it runs out of 120mm and has to go home.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >they actually use them on the front instead of entrenched infantry
            You don't use tanks in entreched positions like a pillbox even if you are on the defense strategically, tanks and IFVs are used for mobile local counterattacks, we've seen a ton of footage depicting this.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Ukraine is getting tanks from NATO surplus stores. Russia can only make shitty tanks because of all the embargos.

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Jon Jones from Michigan oblast here, i'm concerned for The Ukraine. At this rate they're going to run out of ammunition and manpower. In a few weeks POCCNR will be in Kiev)

  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >muh visually confirmed
    Your entire frontline is not going to get unbombed no matter how hard you cope

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe you should try to do localized bigger bombings that actually hit something so you can push through, rather than spreading all your bombs to hit near (~50 meters) some trenches across the entire front?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Or at the very least give Belgorod a break.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *