Ukraine to receive its first batch of GLSDB tommorow

how will this change the situation tactically if at all?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Budanov just announced his plan for this year is destroying the bridge permanently
    >GLSDB tomorrow
    Hmmmm

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >GLSDB
      >destroy bridge
      nah. it only has like 16KG of explosives

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        See

        150km range, 1 meter CEP, 93kg warhead, costs 40k per unit, launched from HIMARS or its own launcher, penetrates a meter of reinforced concrete.

        Jesus Christ how horrifying. How fricked are ziggers now?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ukraine currently holds no territory that puts the Kerch bridge within range of this weapon.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        GLSDB doesn't have the payload to seriously damage the bridge, anyways. What GLSDB does, however, is allow Ukraine to better prioritize their Storm Shadows for hard targets while GLSDBs hit everything else.

        >How fricked are ziggers now?

        Individually, very but Russia can like China sustain infinite personnel losses since those have no social or economic impact on anyone who matters.

        Tragic that GLSDB don't have cameras. Wars exist to display weapons that /k/ may fap.

        GLSDB is quite old and has a nice compact launcher option that could fit a large technical:

        They're not going to be hitting individual troops with these. They'll just be doing the same thing they did with GMLRS, striking rear echelon facilities that were previously safe from GMLRS range. 150km is enough to cover pretty much all of mainland Ukraine and even northern Crimea.

        Another thing that's not talked about is that GLSDB can take programmable flight paths, meaning they don't have to take predictable ballistic arcs like conventional MLRS to reach their targets so they can actually circumvent air defenses.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The real question is, why no smoking accidents inside Russia?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          My use of "individually" meant the ones who happen to die in consequence of hitting facilities. Killing mobiks worth less than the equipment they wear would at most be a side benefit.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Monke will order to tie POW to the bridge as human shields.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Deliver eet

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Another sudden spike of SMOOKER incidents. With GLSDB they have a cheap, long range munition that can hit pretty much anything in the south.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Ukraine to receive its first batch of GLSDB tommorow
    surs

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >GLSDB
    I get that it just werks, but I'm still in disbelief that someone came up with and made this idea. What's next, ground-launched JDAMs?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's not really all that surprising. It's small enough to cram on a GMLRS rocket. The only reason the US didn't adopt it themselves is because they have plenty of aircraft to deploy SDBs from.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah that's why we haven't seen it before. Its a great idea and was easy to make. There just wasn't an operational need within NATO for it. Now that it exists and is likely to rack up a nice kill streak I wonder if it will become a new hot product for GMLRS customers.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >The only reason the US didn't adopt it themselves is because they have plenty of aircraft to deploy SDBs from

        Until they get into a war where they need it and US and allied troops will have to go without till they get it. Tale as old as WWI.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The booster rockets being used for this have hit their expiration dates. Most of them still work, but they can't meet their guaranteed specifications. As for SDB1, something like 20,000 have been built, and the oldest ones are approaching 20 years old, so it's not a huge loss to the US to give them away for use against Russian targets.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I love this menhera horse

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Crazy Horse

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      that's been pitched a number of times but rejected for being an unnecessary kludge

      GLSDB only happened because of all the demilled M30 motors that were already sitting around

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >tomorrow
    >when announced over a year ago
    One could make the argument that the whole long-term Ukraine aid program a lot of US pledged aid actually went to was for exact reason that political bullshit would hold up further immediate aid.
    But to answer the question, expect a lot more explosions in Melitopol and Berdyansk. Maybe in Crimea as well.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The thing is that the US had to actually build them. They had the concept and plenty of spare GMLRS motors and SDBs sitting around, but no pipeline to actually put them together in mass numbers.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    150km range, 1 meter CEP, 93kg warhead, costs 40k per unit, launched from HIMARS or its own launcher, penetrates a meter of reinforced concrete.

    Jesus Christ how horrifying. How fricked are ziggers now?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      150km from himars or air launch ?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        150km is the advertised ground launch range.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >ground launched small diameter bomb
        >air launch

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you just know they'll make an ALGLSDB in 15 years

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >ground launched small diameter bomb
            >air launch

            I give it 6 months before the ukies realise they can increase the range by a factor of X by Black person rigging it to an SU24

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >take air dropped SDB
          >attach a booster on it to make it ground launched
          >put that back on the plane

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            funny you should say that

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >joint
              DUDE

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                cause three out of four services have their own combat jets

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Does air breathing mean jet engine or is it ramjet/scramjet?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I have no idea; IMHO, since this is a low cost weapon, probably a regular turbojet

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Ram and scram is in theory a lot cheaper to make than a turbine once perfected. They have much less or no moving parts.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I don't know jack about this stuff, but don't most cruise missiles use turbojets cause they're most efficient for long range? e.g. Tomahawk, Storm Shadow

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Ram and scram is in theory a lot cheaper to make than a turbine once perfected. They have much less or no moving parts.

                Does air breathing mean jet engine or is it ramjet/scramjet?

                It mentions an alternator option to power more advanced avionics and sensors, so it’s definitely a turbine engine.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        How hard is it to do a software update and put it on a F-16? According to the specs it doesn´t fly in a ballistic route, so all the hardware should be there to strap it on the F-16, except being able to be attached to a hardpoint.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What do you think the GBU-63 is normally attached to anon?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I think he's referring to the GLSDB as a whole, not just the SDB. So the SDB AND the M26.

            It shouldn't be that hard btw. Rampage, which is kinda similar, already exists and is a thing on the F-16I.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Pic related. 250 km range, 150 kg HE.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Absolute fricking moron here, how is this any different from any other glide bombs that they're currently lobbing from behind their own lines?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The rocket motor.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Thank you, as expected the answer was obvious to any non-moron

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                To launch a glide bomb you need an airplane, UAF doesn't have a lot of them available and when they climb up too high, and for lob bombs you need to fly fast and high, they might get detected by the russian radar and get the attention of a MIG31 patrol, yes, they can fire their missiles from russian airspace and maybe hit something.

                With GLSDB just load them on a HIMARS launcher, park it near the front, shoot and scoot, the rocket will put the bomb at the heigh and speed required and from there will glide to whatever needs to be deleted.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                We were talking about air-launched rocket bombs if you read the post I was replying to

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >How fricked are ziggers now?
      my guess is it depends on the frequency of how many the us can make + deliver.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Since the US has an abundance of rockets and they PAID to destroy them, I guess Ukraine is getting infinite amount of them.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          If the current dysfunction of the legislature is any indication then there is still a significant chance that the US will pay to destroy them rather than ship them to Ukraine.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            We pay to buy tanks the army is begging us to stop giving them. Why not just do that jobs program but send them to someone who wants them?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Apparently not having extra jobs is bad for the US taxpayer when it's something involving Ukraine.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They were going to scrap them? And they're just now sending them over?
          I hope they don't send 20 as a joke like they did with ATACMS

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        [...]

        They're fairly cheap, yen times cheaper than gmlrs. It can be a fricking lot

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The real problem is Chechen fighters assraping their own comrades

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That's platonic counselling, and unlike an LOC doesn't affect performance reports unless the victim just lays there.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It'll probably be like 20 or something, how many of them were even pledged?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          20/month? maybe i don't know. sounds too little for how cheap they are. GMLRS costs $100k compared to the $40k of GLSDB and the ukies have been firing them like crazy. this is a wild guess on my part but given how cheap they are maybe they will send like 30-50 per month. they're cheap and easy to make

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This. It could be a very effective weapon, but without the necessary numbers it won't have any appreciable tactical effect.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Literally nothing on mainland Ukraine is safe now. And unlike Storm Shadow, GLSDBs are cheap and plentiful and can be spammed around like GMLRS.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >How fricked are ziggers now?

      Individually, very but Russia can like China sustain infinite personnel losses since those have no social or economic impact on anyone who matters.

      Tragic that GLSDB don't have cameras. Wars exist to display weapons that /k/ may fap.

      GLSDB is quite old and has a nice compact launcher option that could fit a large technical:

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That's the most frightening strength Russia has
        >10 000 conscripts died this month? Fetch me another batch

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Russia 147 million
        >China 1.4 billion
        Really tired of hearing this, Russia population isn't even that large

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          neither is china's

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It'll have minimal impact. Too little, too late. New Year's is already over, for God's sake.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Too little, too late.
        This should be the new NATO slogan.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          UN already took it.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            but UN doesn't even try

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              precisely why it's their motto

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        aged poorly this did.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          oh boy what happened...

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That's the infamous school 19 that got HIMARSed last year. The missiles hit an ammo dump in the basement, which annihilated the school, and a nearby motor pool and fuel depot. Strelkov was extremely bitter about that one.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They'll burn through a couple hundred a week. So a couple thousand at least. France and UK are basically doubling their "long range mobile rocket artillery" this month and the f 16s plus this.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >cheaper than the lawnmowers

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      only 40k?

      cheap as chips

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >penetrates a meter of reinforced concrete
      Delicious

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >1m CEP
      that is insane
      dog bless america

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >It can also be fired from its own launch container, allowing it to be fired from sea
      >fired from sea

      • 3 weeks ago
        OP

        Why not launch from those oil rigs they captured last year? Should be within range for Kerch, and a massive one off salvo could skullfrick rail from vatnikstan.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I think you would be pushing the range and you're shooting straight over all Crimea, where AD should be effective. Plus getting HIMARs or even just launchers onto the rigs is a difficult feat that Ukraine would be unlikely to achieve. The rigs are already doing their job as Area denial for Black Sea Fleet and early warning against missile attacks

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      im literally dancing with joy

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        this needs to be shopped with Shoigu's shrug

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >I'm sure they won't get that many
    Sure buddy

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What makes you think otherwise? I want to believe, but I'm a little bitter at this point tho.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        SDB is cheap and simple. The US has shit tons of them and they aren't all that hard to make. SDB-I is by design a cheap and plentiful weapon. SDB-II is more expensive and more complicated.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >SDB-II is more expensive and more complicated.
          It's still "only" 200k, and the multi-mode seeker that can identify and track moving targets would be amazing at shutting down Russian raiding parties/convoys from like 200+km in a similar ground-launch configuration.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah its still remarkably cheap for what it is. But an order of magnitude more expensive than SDB-I. Just goes to show how expensive jet engines are. LRASM has similar targeting capabilities but a engine for more performance and its a million dollar missile.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              SDB2 isn't powered. The extra cost is from the seeker.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Read my comment again. I didn't say SDB-II was powered. I said LRASM was powered.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The only bottleneck is the production of the glider module for the SDB, and the actual manufacturing process. There's effectively an infinite supply of M26 motors (literally hundreds of thousands) and SDB's.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Do you have a source for this? I can't find any mentions of this anywhere but it would be welcome news since Boeing's been dragging their ass on this thing since last year

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >how will this change the situation tactically
    Any munitions depot/ci3/logistical hub/baracks too far way for HIMARS, or too small for Shadow the storm missile, is officially a target.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >GLSDB
    everything old (the bomb and rocket) is new again.
    I have to applaud Boeing and Saab, this actually seems more like a "what can we do cheap to kick some commie/jihadi ass" weapons development mindset than a "how can we milk billions from the taxpayer" one.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This the difference between peace time and war time.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Boeing
      >"how can we milk billions from the taxpayer"
      bro, that's their motto and life mission

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >that's their fiduciary duty to shareholders
        FTFY

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    can't wait to see these things turn russian artillery into scrap

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      bit too late for that, they roll out the factories like that

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Source? How many?

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Would have been much more useful a year ago.
    Unless Ukraine has another spring offensive stored up that can punch through to the sea of Azov.
    Taking out the bridge is not a knockout blow if the Donbas is fully in Russia's hand.
    Shit sucks and is likely to stay that way. The main bright side is that Russia seems pretty gunshy for the time being

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Russia had been slowly regaining artillery superiority over the recent months in many areas of the front. A few ammo dumps going kaboom is going to help with that.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This. Russia is finally establishing logistics hubs that can support their shell hungry army, on top of their bailout shipment from North Korea. The GLSDB has the range to hit these ammo dumps and hubs that are otherwise too valuable for storm shadows, and are outside GMLRS range. This is what’s needed for a Summer 2024 offensive. Well, this and localized air superiority courtesy of western aircraft, along with more tanks. Kuwait is sending some old modified T-72s, so homefully the west ups tank production and follows suit. Hell, even a couple hundred modernized M60s from Greece and Turkey would help free up more useful tanks for the offensive

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Russia is finally establishing logistics
          Thanks for the laugh. Satan

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          If Ukraine can gather local air superiority over Kherson they won´t need tanks to advance. Their air force can do the same as millions of artillery shells. On the surface it might seem dumb, but the numbers add up. I once read some old report about the Vietnam war. The U.S had to ship 90.000 bullets to Vietnam for every Vietnamese soldier they killed, with bullets. 90.000 bullets for killing one enemy combatant. Seems impossible, but how many artillery shells have Russia fired? They were bragging at one point about 60.000 per day, current estimates is 10.000 from Western sources. So if Ukraine can just get local air superiority over Kherson, 10.000 precision guided missiles/bombs that just hit their target can do the same as 10 million artillery shells. But it does depend on the U.S giving a few of the newest F-16´s to back up the old ones.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            They would need to do a ton of sorties for that and a ton of crews and planes ready, they probably won't have neither in years, even if the aircraft is there they need to train all the crews, ground support and maintenace staff to absorb all that wear and tear.

            They are going to replace the su24 and mig29 that probably are on their last legs by now, that's it.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >, 10.000 precision guided missiles/bombs that just hit their target can do the same as 10 million artillery shells.
            AHHAHHAHHAH
            AHAHAHAHAa
            aHAHHAHAHAH
            AHAHAAHHAHAHHAH

            who are you people?
            seriously who are you?

            lmfao, the idea ukraine is going to get 10k+ precision guided missiles is the fricking most ass moronic thing I have ever heard

            you may as well have asked for the easter bunny to deliver airstrikes instead
            its just about as real, and equally fricking moronic as your post

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >lmfao, the idea ukraine is going to get 10k+ precision guided missiles is the fricking most ass moronic thing I have ever heard
              USA makes in a year 9000 GMLRS rockets, France is delivering 50 AASM each month (600 in a year), SCALP, Storm Shadow, GLSDB and JDAMS. Turns out 10k is not such big number

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anders Munch

                Don´t tell him about the half a million jdams the U.S has produced with a production capacity of 30.000 per year.
                https://www.airandspaceforces.com/usaf-cuts-bomb-funding-funds-new-systems-2022/
                "The Air Force’s request for Joint Direct Attack Munitions fell 88 percent, from 16,800 enacted in fiscal 2021 to 1,919 weapons in 2022. The high water mark of JDAM production was 30,872 units in 2019, meaning JDAM production for the Air Force will have fallen more than 93 percent in three years, if Congress goes along."

                Hopefully not even Biden is pacifistic enough to cut production that much unless the U.S has 200.000 or so in storage.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        May we see it?

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >double the range of GMLRS
    it’s Joever for Puccia ammo dumps

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It’s been a while since an ammo dump got hit.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >It’s been a while since hitting a zigger ammo dump was noteworthy.
        TFY, no charge.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          True. The drone strikes in Russia have tide me over though.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dzhankoy is about to get raped. Right within the "over 150km range" of GLSDB.
    Need I remind you it not only hosts a major helicopter base, but it's also a major railway hub in Crimea. Very much worth the cheap rockets.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It was hit by missiles before, some think it was an ATACMS, which caused fires.
      Also there was a repair depot nearby that was hit with a Storm Shadow as well.
      Wouldn't put it past Russians to have Chornobaivka fever and repeat the same mistake.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    He sent plenty of weapons to Ukraine, b***hed out NATO for not spending enough on defense, and convinced SK and Japan to spend more (for us) on their defense. He doesn’t want weak partners, and Russia has never looked weaker, nor NATO looked stronger at least in this century. Land war in Yurop has everyone’s blood pumping.

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why are the US annoucing this shit? They didnt annouce ATACMS,

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Smoking accidents.

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Welp, another SU-34 might have been shot down so another Ukraine thread needs to be about American political homosexualry (pleonasm). You know how it is.

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Warehouses spontaneously combust
    >Bridge closed for 2 weeks
    >Some general no one has heard of yet dies near the front
    >Everyone collectively forgets they even got them in the first place.
    >Many more months of grinding for the next rank in the NATO battlepass

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Jej. I forgot that jackass died

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Hinkle or Ritter next?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Hinkle. Ritter gets called a pedo every time he posts. Budanov would be doing us a huge favor if Hinkle bit it while doing another larp in Russia.
          >MAGA Communist
          >proving that the only good communist is a dead one.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >proving that the only good communist is a dead one.
            Can't argue with that but holy frick it's a tough choice who is worse - the traitor or the pedo traitor.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >proving that the only good communist is a dead one.
            Can't argue with that but holy frick it's a tough choice who is worse - the traitor or the pedo traitor.

            Come on Russia do a solid and send his ass towards the front lines on a T-55 so he can take a Javelin to the forehead.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The sad thing is his family probably wouldn't even shed a tear for him.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Porque no los dos?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            lmao based anticommie mexican girl

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              yo quiero TZD

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'll go one further and say that a price should be put on all their heads for anyone to take advantage of. Not just Ritter and Hinkle, but every fifth columnist should be expunged in a hail of bullets.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >I'll go one further and say that a price should be put on all their heads for anyone to take advantage of. Not just Ritter and Hinkle, but every fifth columnist should be expunged in a hail of bullets.
              Absofrickinglutely.

              yo quiero TZD

              also this

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >everyone who expresses ideas I dislike should be killed
                Go ahead and take a peek at the 1A, homosexual.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >unironically defending 5th columnist scum
                Face the fricking wall.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                cringe

                Anyone who travels to a nation that is not just posing a hypothetical threat, but loudly crowing about the prospect of combat with us, anyone who travels to such a nation and gives comfort, or succor, is not a 1A issue, it's treason. The fact that one is a twice-convicted pedo and the other a communist just makes it more enjoyable should they find themselves up against a wall.

                nope, they are free citizens enjoying their rights as free men. If they want to say stupid shit, they are free to do so.
                >but they say things on the internet!
                The internet doesnt matter, you terminally online homosexual. check you feelings and get some vitamin d in your system.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Black person, if he did it for free, then he's just a useful idiot and not worth bothering with. If he takes money from others to yap treason, he should be without a second thought thrown into prison at a bare minimum or domed and dumped in the garbage at worst.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >if if
                Who fricking cares what some literal who does on the internet. The internet does not fricking matter. Its like getting assblasted because the postman has a hot take one something.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They're not saying stupid shit on the internet, they're travelling to an adversarial nation and providing help to that adversary. They both deserve the rope.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                [...]

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous
              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Anyone who travels to a nation that is not just posing a hypothetical threat, but loudly crowing about the prospect of combat with us, anyone who travels to such a nation and gives comfort, or succor, is not a 1A issue, it's treason. The fact that one is a twice-convicted pedo and the other a communist just makes it more enjoyable should they find themselves up against a wall.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Have you realized freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences yet?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Have you realized freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences yet?
                go be a leftist someplace else.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >REEEEEEE UR A LEFTIST
                moron, do you think everyone that disagrees with you is a leftist?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I think everyone who says the leftist catchphrase
                >freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences
                Is a leftist. Yes. 100%.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What if I told you I think tankies should all be disposed of in creative ways?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'd still tell you to be an authoritarian collectivist someplace else.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous
              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >1st amendment covers treason
                Nope. The fact so many get away with it today does not mean its meant to be that way

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Hinkle or Ritter next?
          Hinkle is pivoting to queers for palestine.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Hopefully some camel-fricker will decide he has a pretty mouth

        • 3 weeks ago
          BigLoyd45

          Douglas MacGregor

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            My body is ready. Frick that cuck.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Pneumonia
        >Known chain smoker
        >Walked his own ass back into Ukraine
        >State Department confirms death
        I thought it was fake news at first but damn that's one less shill and he was stupid enough to check himself back into Ukraine after they told him to buzz off.

        Hinkle or Ritter next?

        Hinkle if he's stupid enough to be Jane Fonda 2.0 and ride into Ukraine on a Pantsir for a photoshoot before a HARM from before Gulf War rams into it. Scott Ritter Child Diddler already got baited twice by feds so he's probably up for a third honeypot at any rate.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Scott Ritter Child Diddler already got baited twice by feds so he's probably up for a third honeypot at any rate.
          I suspect his kiddie affliction is probably what keeps him singing from the Kremlin song sheet - both on the supply side and the "would be a real shame if someone saw these pictures" side.

          https://i.imgur.com/btYoXu5.jpg

          [...]
          Come on Russia do a solid and send his ass towards the front lines on a T-55 so he can take a Javelin to the forehead.

          I would fap to that drone video

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Why is he wearing a Bernie shirt???

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            He started as a bernie bro. Somehow this has evolved into MAGA-Communism and simping for everything anti-american that the internet can provide

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >MAGA-Communism
              How did burger politics become this schizophrenic?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Tankies have always been fascists in red coats.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Because he was a communist and still is? Not like he hides it either.

            >MAGA-Communism
            How did burger politics become this schizophrenic?

            The MAGA part is just communism as applied to the politicis of twitter, basically window dressing.

            Tankies have always been fascists in red coats.

            >communists have always been these former communists that didn't exist for most of communism's history

            Angloid moment.

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >will eventually
    Every day it just gets more sad and pathetic.

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Even if they did lol, what do they gain? While the rest of the civilized world advances they gain a country FULL of people that hate them and land mines.

    A kingdom of ashes

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      > the rest of the civilized world advances
      advances how and where?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        having working sewers and mostly drinkable tap water

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This announcement should have been after the first batch of explosions. The West is still playing with multiple sets of gloves on.

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I hope the INS is better than JDAM otherwise it will be vulnerable to GPS jamming.

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >confusing milquetoast lefties with commies
    >proceeds to describe shit done by his beloved gulag goblins
    Of fricking curse, ivan

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    no I wouldn't because my parents weren't wastrel, manual laboring peons.

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    literally of of that existed in communist countries in europe
    t. bulgarian

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      all of that*

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Ukraine to receive its first batch of GLSDB tommorow
    Russia to receive its first batch of GLSDB tomorrow too, but there is a nuance.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >ass
      in the ass

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Send MOABs next. Frick Puccia

  30. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >will eventually
    Damn is this the best you guys can do? Aren't you supposed to demoralize us and not the other way around?

  31. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    this video is from January 2023
    could this be GLSDB being tested before actual delivery? i've seen this claim somewhere
    it doesn't look like a regular himars launch

  32. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >enough surplus productivity to absorb all that leeching=eighties
    we are gonna keep killing Russians and we'll make it an industrial endeavor.

  33. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Explosions all over Crimea. Belbek airfield is on fire.
    Zigs report mutiple SCALP launches.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Big if true

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      New bombs?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Makaron sent his regards (40 SCALPs) last week.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      surs or fako

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/nxIcuBt.png

      basado!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Total KA-52 Death!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Big if true

      we have some videos of the Belbek Airbase strike, about when it happened

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Looks like air defence is working hard

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >RU MoD: XAXAXAXAX ALL INTERCEPTED JUST SOME DEBRIS AND NO DAMAGE
          >Reality:

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Can I get some cliff notes?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >A total of 20 guided missiles were destroyed, 17 of them over the Black Sea and 3 of them over the Crimean Peninsula. Debris fell on the territory of a military unit in the Lyubimivka area. No damage to aircraft was noted.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So they intercepted none of them is what they're saying

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                How many can ukraine even realistically launch at once?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Wikipedia says they've 14 Su-24s in inventory that means realistically they should be able to launch 28 at once.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Ahem, Armchair Warlord and other highly respected OSINT people have told me that the Ukrainian airforce has been well and truly destroyed. Destroyed like 4 times over, infact.

                So i find it highly unlikely that any Su24's are left in service

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Sorry, you're probably right. The planes that actually launched them were more than likely Tornados or Typhoons piloted by the perfidious albion.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                God that was a wild ride.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If the 14 aiframes are in working condition and if they have 28 storm shadows available for just one target.

                Probably just a couple of misssiles and some MALD fodder for the pantsirs

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Holy shit you can see an AD missile completely miss the Storm Shadow at 4 seconds

  34. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      if they have done a big strike (waiting on more proofs) why the frick do they always do this?
      >get 20 HIMARS
      >SHOOT IMMEDIATLY

      Why not wait a couple months and fire off a big strike that fricks up a bunch of shit simultaneously.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Because there ain't no pause during war. Stockpiling is nice, but when you have a fricking horde over the thousands miles front, you have to throw everything at them.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Russians have intel, you can't hide stocking of a new weapon type + updating logistics and doctrine for a long time.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If you've got intel on targets you shoot immediately. You can't guarantee when and what intel you get next if any.

  35. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      NO PANIC

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Air defence guys are the best
      I know of like a dozen russian aircraft that would argue against that, but OK

  36. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Explosions in Krasnotar before.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      More. MORE!

  37. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    At this rate it will happen in 50 years and the last wasteland heaps will be assaulted by vatBlack person women and children with shovels and stone throwers, while Russia itself will be thrown back 100 year back in time.
    Im not even exaggerrating, vatBlack folk regular army no longer exists, its just the bunch of prisoners and former factory workers using 60yo vehicles and artillery, and they cant even take over the heaps of Avdiivka.

  38. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    lets go

  39. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Snow Nigeria is suffering again. You love to see it.

  40. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >how will this change the situation tactically if at all?

    + Ukie max range bombardments increase from 90 km to 150 km
    - It is a subsonic glide bomb so russian air defense will have an easy job.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If they can't reliably intercept GMLRS warheads which fly on predictable ballistic trajectories, they're not going to be able to reliably intercept SDBs which are just as tiny and are actually capable of maneuvering midflight.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >If they can't reliably intercept GMLRS warheads which fly on predictable ballistic trajectories, they're not going to be able to reliably intercept SDBs which are just as tiny and are actually capable of maneuvering midflight.

        They can intercept GLMRS, its just that their air defense isnt everywhere and they have to use missiles, because they do not have guns that fire ammo with proximity or timed fuzes. Their best AAA guns are 30 mm gast guns with direct impact fuzed ammo. Thats stuff you want to use if you are shooting at aircraft. Against missiles and drones, not so much.

        If you manuver a glide bomb, it will lose range, so for deep shots it have to go on a straight line. A gepard or skynex gun sitting as point defense in the rear would harvest these SDBs because it has the proper ammo and fire control for doing that and the bomb will come gliding at subsonic speed. SDB is very much a colonial warfare weapon. They will still be useful because of their low cost and huge supply, if it materializes.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >year of our lord Allah 1445
          >russians use impact fuses on AAA rounds

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          GMRLS missiles pounded the Kherson bridge like 20 times without being intercepted. You wanna tell me that they didn't have AA there?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >GMRLS missiles pounded the Kherson bridge like 20 times without being intercepted. You wanna tell me that they didn't have AA there?

            The ukies swamped them by mixing in their own unguided 220 and 300 mm rockets in the bombardment salvos so the russian defense was overwhelmed. Not to hard to do since they relied entirely on missiles.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I've watched the videos of Russian AA defending that bridge, there was zero saturation attack, no random explosions only explosions on the bridge and AA wildly missing everything

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I've watched the videos of Russian AA defending that bridge, there was zero saturation attack, no random explosions only explosions on the bridge and AA wildly missing everything

                Then you saw different videos than me because I save russian AD intercepts (explosions high in the air) and then the russians ran out of missiles.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          From what I've seen, they're basically relying purely on Pantsirs for SHORAD now, and we've seen plenty of videos and testimony that they don't work as advertised.

          In fact, I don't recall seeing any indications of Shilkas, Tunguskas, or any other Russian SPAAGs being active.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Shilkas are scrapped in Russia, only the ukies use some surviving units. Tunguskas were seen during the early stages of the war. Since they are tracked, they are likely put on stationary duty in the rear, leaving the mobile AAA role to Pantsirs.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/KR3GhcI.png

          >year of our lord Allah 1445
          >russians use impact fuses on AAA rounds

          From what I've seen, they're basically relying purely on Pantsirs for SHORAD now, and we've seen plenty of videos and testimony that they don't work as advertised.

          In fact, I don't recall seeing any indications of Shilkas, Tunguskas, or any other Russian SPAAGs being active.

          >Their best AAA guns are 30 mm gast guns with direct impact fuzed ammo

          Isn't that the AK-230 which is a naval gun? I can't think of any Russian land based system that uses that, in fact the only thing i can think of is the mystery Nork SPAAG. I don't think we have seen any of those yet, they are probably too expensive

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Isn't that the AK-230 which is a naval gun?

            No the gast gun works on a different principle than the gatling gun. The gast has two barrels, the recoil from one barrel is cycling the other barrel and vice versa. It fires rather fast.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The AK-230 is a gast gun, you are thinking of the AK-630 which is a gattling gun. The Nork SPAAG uses a AK- 230 clone:

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Unless it is a copy of a 30mm twin bomber tail gun which would be better but i don't think it is.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >direct impact fuzed ammo
          please tell me you're joking

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >russian air defense will have an easy job

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/cnIqlck.png

        Holy shit you can see an AD missile completely miss the Storm Shadow at 4 seconds

        where is S-400?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          taking a nap

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          in ASS

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >It is a subsonic glide bomb so russian air defense will have an easy job.
      that's the thing though. SDB can do funny manoeuvres that avoid/make it harder for AD to intercept.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        hopefully they keep a shit ton of their radars on long enough to take a HARM up the ass once the SDBs start getting launched

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >VKS "destroys" entire Ukrainian chair force one week into the SMO
          >Ukie ChairForce mad Lads still yeeting HAARMS Black person rigged to their Funny Fulcrums at Russian SAMs in year of our lord two thousand and twenty four
          The most moronic timelines are the most glorious ones.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >It is a subsonic glide bomb so russian air defense will have an easy
      I thought that too, then I remembered it's Russian air defenses.

  41. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    lmao, where I live those things were brought in by the Liberals and Christian Democrats because happy and educated workers are productive workers

  42. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >developed by Boeing
    RIP to Ukraine, Pajeet weapons are a net negative

  43. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The latest "gamechanger" like Stormshadow (why does the western MIC come up with the most dumbest names. I think it's all of the capeshit they watch). I'm fairly uneducated on this so how much over a benefit will this actually provide. Are they being supplied i enough number to make much of a difference?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the main benefit is the cost, it's only like 40k~ per GLSDB, they aren't as useful as actual missiles since they have a much smaller payload but they are at the point where you can throw one at any vehicle you see and there's a good chance the GLSDB is cheaper than what you're hitting nevermind the crew.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        TY. The stormshadow always seemed cool but entirely the wrong tool for the type of war being fought. Barely any were handed over and it was basically "here's this cool expensive gamechanger that we'll blueball you with"

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >they aren't as useful as actual missiles since they have a much smaller payload
        wtf? they have decent penetration capabilities and a CEP of 1m. they are extremely useful, and could be for different purposes

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >CEP of 1m
          Warcrime

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Frick off tourist
      >captcha VATTGR

  44. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    new wunderwaffe just dropped

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No it's not. That's the point. It's just clever combination of two cheap readily available pieces of equipment put together.
      It's plentiful, relatively cheap and easy to launch from about anyting.

  45. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How come they are not blocked by the congress?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ? In America? They are about to put 60 billion more in aid. The dod Put 250 million more in this week. Fed will put money in next. The eu added another 50 billion.
      Ukraine will end up getting 150 billion in aid this year. That's not much to the EU, USA, Australia, Japan, Korea. Probably 40 trillion dollar economies spending 150 billion is nothing.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That was paid for in 2023

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      already paid for, dingus

  46. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine is doomed.
    Should have laid down the arms a year ago.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I am demoralized.

      t. Johnathan smith of the burger town Oblast

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  47. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Unlucky mobiks to receive its first batch of GLSDB in a few days

  48. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Apologize to SAAB

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *