Ukraine still has massive amounts of Western firepower.

Current Attrition rates of Western military equipment in Ukraine
As of 5/10/23
(according to Oryx, all visually confirmed) - lost includes damaged and destroyed. Only including equipment of western design and origin - modified soviet equipment included.

Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20230821220340/https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/04/answering-call-heavy-weaponry-supplied.html
https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-ukrainian.html

Tanks
Leopard 2A6 (21) - Lost (9) - (43%)
Leopard 2A4 (54) - Lost (7) - (13%)
M-55s - (28) - Lost (2) - (7%)
Challenger 2 (14) - Lost (1) - (7%)
PT-91 Twardy (60) - Lost (2) - (3%)
Leopard 1A5 (165) - Lost (0) - (0%)
Strv 122s (10) - Lost (0) - (0%)

AFVs
AMX-10 RC (40) - Lost (4) - (10%)

IFVs
Bradley M2A2 (182) - Lost (53) - (29%)
YPR-765 (196) - Lost (48) - (24%)
CV90 (50) - Lost (3) - (6%)
KTO Rosomak (200) - Lost (1) - (0.5%)
Marder (40) - Lost (0) - (0%)

APC
M113 (778) - Lost (66) - (8%)
FV103 Spartan (114) - Lost (3) - (3%)
VAB (60) Delivered - Lost (12) - (20%)
Patria Pasi (20) - Lost (7) - (35%)
Bushmaster (90) - Lost (8) - (9%)
Stryker - (157) - Lost (3) - (2%)

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >FV103 Spartan (114) - Lost (3) - (3%)
    Warriortard in shambles

  2. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >KTO Rosomak (200) - Lost (1) - (0.5%)

    I really hope Mexico chooses this to replace the AMX VCI. It's supposedly down to this with a French 40mm CTA gun vs an 8x8 version of the Guarani with a 40mm conventional autocannon.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >an 8x8 version of the Guarani with a 40mm conventional autocannon.
      They should choose this. Brazil needs to sell more weapons

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >an 8x8 version of the Guarani with a 40mm conventional autocannon.
      They should choose this. Brazil needs to sell more weapons

      Not just because it's Brazil and needs to sell more weapons, but it's also geographically better.
      Gorgeous APC.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        It has the same face as those characters in Ukrainian Kontakt comics.

  3. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Attrition loss rates are apparently quite high though when you're losing 30% of your Bradleys and half of your Leopard 2A6s (that goes for Russia too)

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Russia lost half their Leopard 2A6s? Why wasn't this in the news?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        They lost half thier images of destroyed Leos when that Canadian chuggie got zapped by mountees for his link to the paypal russian gang rape site.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          qrd?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      This sort of operation -- assaulting an extremely well-entrenched enemy behind layered defenses, without the aid of air superiority -- is one of the most punishing tasks that ground forces can be asked to perform. I believe the rule of thumb for something like this is to assume 25% casualties "assuming nothing goes wrong".
      The real measure here is that the AFU is knocking on the door in places and the RuAF has been able to slow them down but not push them back out to their start lines.

  4. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Strv 122s (10) - Lost (0) - (0%)
    SWEDEN STRONK

  5. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Now post Russian losses :3

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      This year theyre minial and you can see that from all the telegram videos

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        That's because russia doesn't have nearly as much of it as they started with. So naturally losses will reduce.. as there wasn't much of it to lose in the first place.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Good luck explaining basic math to vatniks. I remember one vodka Black person being insistent on western healthcare being shit due to cancer being more common in western countries.

          He literally didn't understand how Russians having low median life expectancy meant they literally are too busy dying before the cancer can develop and kill them is the main reason Russian cancer death rates are "low".
          Well. That, and because their healthcare is too shitty to allow the diagnosis cancer before it literally kills the patient in many cases. A vatBlack person may die riddled with tumors but it's aids or his hepatic cirrhosis that score the coup de grace in many cases.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Hi, quick question, are you on meth because that's the only reason I can think someone would say something so stupid

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >minimal
        So losing 5:1 while on the defensive is minimal now?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Kek those are the homosexuals that will unironically say "/k/ope"

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >you can see that from all the telegram videos
        This has to be a joke

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          No, he's just delusional and is spoonfed a narrative that he can neither see nor call into question.

          It's the "show proofs" - "that's not proof enough" - "it didn't matter anyways" mindset of the vatnik brainrot. A sad existence, unworthy for a human.

  6. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    id say willing manpower is the bigger problem right now

  7. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ok guys here's a whole bunch of defensive equipment, now go on offensive with them xD

  8. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Leopard 2A6 (21) - Lost (9) - (43%)
    >Leopard 2A4 (54) - Lost (7) - (13%)
    The Forbes article claims 5 lost and 'at least 10' damaged, which are being repaired

    Is it fair to extrapolate a 2:1 damaged to lost ratio to the rest of equipment? probably not, but when you've got 65 tanks, having 10 out of action in repairs aint too shabby

    also, 10 MBTs lost, and soon to receive 30 Abrams, that's a pretty nice net gain

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      forbes is literally just using oryx's list

      we have no idea how much shit has actually been destroyed or damaged

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        yes for the numbers, but they've done a little digging with regards the volume being repaired

        https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2023/07/29/ukrainian-tank-losses-diminish-as-polish-technicians-save-more-and-more-damaged-leopard-2s/

  9. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder these are just visually confirmed losses, real one are very likely to be higher

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nah that's basically only true of Russia.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        why so?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Because when we are talking about Ukraine using western equipment we pretty much have always sufficient amount of their footage because of Ukrainian NATO propaganda, but also because we are talking about miniscule numbers and also fact that despite all of these losses there was not a single incedent when the entire crew of said vehicle died which is by far the most important statistic anon, because human lives unlike tanks can't be replaced and trained crew is far more valuable than any tank

  10. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >some mines
    some mines?
    Ukrainians have been posting videos where there are up to half a dozen arty-deployed mines per square meter.
    >nato trained
    It is a fraction of the main million strong force.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      How you you suggest they deal with the mine situation. Seen lots of people talk about it but nobody has actually provided any real method of dealing with them during an attempted advance.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Mine clearing explosives + armoured advance

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          If it was that easy then Ukraine would be doing it but it seems they miss the mine clearing part and go straight to the armoured advance over mines which leads to them losing all their armour.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ukrainians are currently afraid to actually commit to a push so they send these probing attacks with few tanks and AFVs that get destroyed by gayots, mines and Alligators.
        They should advise with Americans to perform a breakthrough like it was done in the Desert Storm where even Arabs managed to deal with deep minefields while under tank fire, granted, everyone had support from some one thousand aircraft, and in Ukraine, there is no air war so that is somewhat of a positive.

        Idk, they should just stop with the pushes into minefields while having no medium AD.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Sending your shit in piecemeal to get fricked up sounds like a terrible idea. Even if they do breakthrough somewhere then they will only have the small force that did it while the rest of their offensive force will be scrambling to try and get there to flood the gap but by the time they do the Russians will have reinforced the area and probably turned the section into an even bigger death trap than before which explains why the front has been pretty much stagnant except for the occasional robotown and similar villages which are taken before being lost and retaken and then lost and so on.

          Also this war is in no way comparable to desert storm like what the frick kind of comparison is that? If the US tried doing that in Ukraine then their aircraft would be blown out of the sky by the ungodly amount of AA while the armoured advance would hit a minefield and stop while the enemy started throwing artillery, ATGMs, drones or attack helicopter missiles at the disabled or stuck vehicles and the public would shit themselves the moment they noticed casualties got into the tens of thousands.

          The iraq military basically collapsed before US soldiers even entered iraq as all the military and government buildings were bombed long before any ground advance even occurred but again air power doesn’t really work in Ukraine.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >If the US tried doing that in Ukraine then their aircraft would be blown out of the sky by the ungodly amount of AA while the armoured advance would hit a minefield and stop while the enemy started throwing artillery, ATGMs, drones or attack helicopter missiles at the disabled or stuck vehicles and the public would shit themselves the moment they noticed casualties got into the tens of thousands.
            LOL, this moron thinks the US can't SEAD like lame russians and doesn't know that iraqis actually fought harder and more competently than any russian we've seen in this war.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >we
              Who "we"? None of you been to the Ukrainian battlefields and none of you faced Russians in combat. None of you know what the frick you're talking about.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Who "we"?
                anybody paying attention, shill

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >doesn't know that iraqis actually fought harder and more competently than any russian we've seen in this war.
                Ukraine would have already crushed Iraq

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >none faced russians in combat
                >what is syria
                what is gayner and russian units suddenly claimed to be non-rusian to avoid responsibility and shame because your strike force got blown by a single fricking aircraft

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >doesn't know that iraqis actually fought harder and more competently than any russian we've seen in this war.
              Ukraine would have already crushed Iraq

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                1991 Iraq would crush 2022 Russia

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                both Ukraine and Russia can defeat Iraq

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            You don't know what you are talking about.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            holy frick, at several poitns iraq had an absurd AA defence and guess what? burgers were doing bombing runs 24/7 via aerial force, shut the frick up about things you have no idea about
            liek whole US doctrine is about spamming air control everywhere so land forces can enter and finish the rest. In ukraine they woudl just swarm detected AA sites. And since its 2023 and not goatfrickers wars, they woudl prolly spam guided missiles before deploying aircrafts

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            The U.S. military isn't invulnerable, but don't underestimate it either.

            The Western equipment that Ukraine has now is very good at protecting the lives of the soldiers inside compared to their old Soviet-origin stuff. The problem is, that Russia can knock the vehicles out at an unsustainable rate. It's the rate of loss that is the problem. Russia also has a problem though here with its artillery, since they like to fire artillery at their own positions when Ukraine takes them, but the Ukrainians disperse quickly once taking a position, and then the Russian artillery lights itself up for Ukrainian counter-battery systems and longer-ranged artillery like HIMARS. One thing they've been doing is simply wiring their own positions to blow up with explosives. It'd be rather scary to be a Russian soldier defending a position that's also booby-trapped.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >so they send these probing attacks with few tanks and AFVs that get destroyed by gayots, mines and Alligators.
          >Idk, they should just stop with the pushes into minefields while having no medium AD.
          Cool story, now please explain to us when Russian army will stop running?

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            As soon as Ukraine reaches the first line of defense.

  11. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >counting damaged as lost
    what

  12. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    You might as well go back.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >says the redditer

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Good evening sir

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Go back, VK tourist.

        [...]
        Story on the webm ? Looks like a war crime

        It is what a vatBlack person considers a "victory".

  13. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Story on the webm ? Looks like a war crime

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Stormtrooper walks up to them and says hands up and drop your guns. They do neither. They say they're friendly, despite both wearing yellow bands, and the guy wearing whites. They probably sustained concussions recently, probably in the same combat. He grabs their guns, the guy on the right refuses to let go of his gun. This promts the stormtrooper to shoot him up. He also shoots up the other guy who technically isn't cooperating either, though clearly there was less reason to do so, but he probably wasn't using his reasoning skills at the moment.

      Just your regular trench sweeping. He tried to take them prisoner but they decided to play dumb.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >justifying literal warcrimes

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Do you think people don't get shot in war?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >it's a war crime to shoot people who don't surrender
          Next thing you say showing up to a war is itself a war crime.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Post the LOAC you assert was violated you idiot Black person.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Just your regular trench sweeping
        maybe to non-Europeans

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Trying to take people prisoner before shooting them up sure is NOT a european thing to do, now that you mention it.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            In Desert Storm, majority of the forces were late because they were processing prisoners of war, sure, 10 minutes earlier they buried their buddies alive in their trenches lol but still.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              I was poking fun at Ukrainian side volunteers who shoot Russians indiscriminately even while they're trying to surrender, as in unarmed and with their hands up. Not to say anything about PoW executions, that was fricking ridiculous. Drone dropping grenades on a tied up blindfolded man? Are you fricking trying to one-up ISIS here?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >as in unarmed and with their hands up
                never happened

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                If you say so lmao. Thanks to the power of ignorance and denial, you'll always have the high ground in this type of arguments.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Evidence, motherfricker, do you have it?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                NTA but when you said they were trying to one up ISIS you were clearly incorrect. They're trying to one-up the russians. You know, the people firing cruise missiles at churches and theaters when they aren't raping ukrainian children or murdering POWs.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Thanks to the power of ignorance and denial
                dude I'm still waiting for those ISIS execution videos and shooting of surrendered Russians

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                It didn't happen but I wish it did

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Warcrime

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          moron

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        You forgot the best part which is the rolling jump at the end of the video

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Thats not the full story either. The Soldier recording threw a grenade into the foxhole who killed the soldier lying next to them, and both soldiers were completely dazed from surviving a near point blank grenade explosion. They don't notice the armband initially and think he's friendly, but when the guy on the right comes to and realises he's an enemy, he panics, grabs his rifle, then the soldier shoots both of them.

        Its not a warcrime, but its pretty pathetic Russians are still recycling videos from what, 9-10 months ago?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >warcrime
      Go back

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      He told them to drop guns for like 10 times, but they were shell-shocked and did not understand, in the heat of battle, he decided that it was safer to shoot them, and then made a tactical roll for stamina regen

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      perfidy, russian soldier dressed as a ukie gets the drop on some tdf

  14. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    How the frick do you lose almost half of your 2A6's?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      By starting out with 21 of the fricking things.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >lose half of your Leopards
        >achieve nothing
        What exactly have the Leopards done since they were introduced? Except from exploding.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          be forgiving, despite everything the ukrainians are still slavs

  15. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    If you don't get punished then the fact of it being (or not being) a crime is irrelevant

  16. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Ziggers are still spamming this same webm after all this time? lmfao

  17. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >It's what happens when you turn churches and theaters into ammo stores and barracks.
    >It's the same reason Ukraine would bomb Donbass cities for 8 years.
    Forgot to add that.

  18. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Do you have anything concrete, and not just "dude trust me"?

  19. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    That’s not the number of destroyed. OP worded it weirdly.

  20. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    bro just one ISIS exuction, I don't ask for much, just post it bro

  21. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]

    >admitting to be a russian 2ch poster
    And you pretend to be taken seriously here, lol

  22. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Nice lefty/misc/ meme you got there bunker-kun. Your husband made it for you?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      he just stole it after noticing that people call Russia ontologically evil

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Nah I've seen it floating about the leftoid circles. I'd assume both meme addled lefties and moronic ruzzians use the same memes because they're politically congruent with each other.

  23. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Yeah let me just rifle through an entire fricking imageboard real quick.
    Yeah? You've made a claim, you're supposed to back it up, not that I'm suppose to go through that whole Russian cesspool and find it for you

  24. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Counting damaged and recovered Western equipment is disingenuous. These aren't single-use shitboxes like the T-72, they are actually meant to be repaired and returned to combat.

  25. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >I'm not worried about mutts' opinion.
    Yes you are, or you wouldn't be here shilling and seeking validation from westerners.

    Behind all the lies you tell yourself, you know deep inside that Russia has fricked up his last chance and its imperial dream is now gone forever. You'll become chinese vassals or you'll need to come back begging to the EU. Your GDP, population, and failed military do not allow for any other fate.

  26. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Total support to Ukraine $165bn including military financial and humanitarian
    Thats literally nothing, its just over one years combined defence budget of the UK and Germany.
    The return on that $165bn is insane look how much of a state of Russia and the sheer number of Russian equipment lost.

  27. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Billions of dollars is pocket change for us, we got russian money you had in the West, and just a few military surplus left overs have been enough to broke the Oh so scary bear that bragged about reaching germany in weeks, lol
    Ukraine has been winning since last year. This is just the dirty work of the clean up.

    That's why you're here shilling and coping to "change the narrative", because you know you're fricked in reality. the myth of Russia Stronk born out of WW2 and the US help has been broken forever and it's not coming back. Even other thirdworlders smell your weakness now.

  28. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Bradley has highest loss rate for anything sent over in large numbers
    What went wrong?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Used the most

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      things are there to be used you dork. losses are a sign they're going into the toughest fights and being used the most.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Counting damaged as lost

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Bradleys are the most numerous of the main western vehicles in their service and very good at what they do, so ukies have been using them more in their attacks, which obviously mean they lost more.
      The US has loads of them and will keep sending more, so it's not going to change for now.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Has a worse destruction rate than some Dutch ifv from the 70s (based on a M113 lmao)

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Worse than that
        It has the same loss rate as the BMP in Ukrainian service, despite being in combat for only a few months

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >IFVs share similar attrition when used for the same offensive roles
          I for one am shocked

  29. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    kek

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Open the catalogue, vatBlack folk are gonna work overtime today.

      [...]

      kek stfu moron

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I opened the catalog but the challenger killed didn’t go away.

  30. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Leopard 2A4/2A6 achievements?

  31. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    One was lost today, my dude. Unless you're doing a false flag post which is probably more likely given this cesspit.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      To be fair 82nd air assault brigade (who are equipped with them) has now been in combat for 2-3 weeks and momentum has picked up, surprising only one has been lost given the intensity of the combat.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >To be fair 82nd air assault brigade (who are equipped with them) has now been in combat for 2-3 weeks and momentum has picked up, surprising only one has been lost given the intensity of the combat.

        Remember Bradley and Leo getting humiliated on day one of their offensive?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          May we see the 82nd in combat. We have videos of the 47th liberating robotyne but nothing from the 82nd save for burning strykers and challenger

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            47th were rotated out after they failed to hold Robotyne, 82nd and 86th were then moved in, retook it and are now flanking Russian positions. a few days ago they were geolocated (green pin) to be behind the surovkin line of prepared defences. As you'd expect from a heavyweight brigade with elite infantry.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              May we see a source. All we have is the initial 47th taking robotyne but nothing to back up what you just claimed

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Why was the 47th so fricking shit?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                probably trained by germans or women

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                They were partially trained by the UK but their individual combat skills have never been in question. Just their equipment and the position they were put in. The leadership has also been a bit unusual (the field photo) but that's probably senior officers from the soviet era who revert to their oldest training when things fall apart.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                They were only ever meat for the grinder. They were more capable than a far larger number of troops with soviet gear which allowed those troops to rotate back and rest. You could tell from the components that they were never designed for a defensive breach or subsequent breakout.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              various fictions

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Do you know why you are shilling here? What exploded this time in Russia? Or did they lose another meaningless village without any strategic importance behind their prepared fortifications?

            How much are you getting paid, what color are your hands?

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >What exploded this time in Russia?
              We do a little bit of samegaygery here now:
              A drone, in Moscow.

              Seems like the new anti drone AA that was positioned on small artificial hills with impressive ramps doesn't work so well.
              To the surprise of everyone as I imagine.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            The 47th got to the northern outskirts then were rotated. The green is their progress in 3 months, the blue is 82nd and 46th in 3 weeks. The anti-tank ditches in the Surovikin line have been crossed and the Russians have been seen shelling their own trenches. Verbove will fall shortly and then it's game on because the forces defending the way to tokmak will have to fall back or be flanked. The Russian reserve has already been committed, the only way to get more forces is to pull them from somewhere else.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              May I see proof. I’m not going to just take your word for it

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                We all know you will accept no "proof" that isn't putting a bullet in your head right after you were walked through the liberated Robotyne.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I will accept proof. You haven’t offered any. You keep making statements about the 47th being replaced but won’t show anything that backs that up.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Maybe not exactly what everybody's looking for, but interesting nonetheless: these are the fortifications on that map south of Robotyne, north of Novoprokopivka, geolocated to 47.430542,35.827070
                The report I read is that the explosion in the pic was part of the AFU's trench-clearing, and that they've already held it and moved further. All the chatter on Russian Telegram that Robotyne is "still in the grey zone" appears to be just that (meaningless chatter), and the AFU's rate of advance looks like it's increasing.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Can’t find any sources reporting the 47th has been withdrawn. Could you share them

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >humiliated
          >by 5 vehicles damaged
          >not lost
          Seems to be doing pretty good tbh

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Leopard 2A6 (21) - Lost (9) - (43%)
            >Bradley M2A2 (182) - Lost (53) - (29%)

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Counting damaged as destroyed
              VatBlack person

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Is this repairable by Ukraine? It's not exactly an engine bay rebuild is it?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                pic

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Is that 50 vehicles. Looks like one to me

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                50 is more than 1.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                27 destroyed out of 183. Not bad for the amount of combat it’s seen.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                one Bradley Destroyed or damaged for every 100m of advance over 3/4 months.

                That's awful.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Cope. The Bradley is being given credit for the liberation of robotyne. That’s huge

                [...]

                [...]

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Warriortard was right

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                "cope" "cope" "cope" "cope" it's like whack a mole, every time you get rekt you make a little ping. You hadn't heard of robotyne until a week ago and now it's your greatest achievement warriortard.

                This is what i'd expect from a disgusting deviant fart fetishist like you.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Listing gains in length rather than area is moronic

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                when it's a bulge it's not. Also distance forward IS area.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >one Bradley Destroyed or damaged for every 100m of advance
                This sounds exaggerated, Anon. The distance from Orikhiv to the geolocated defense works at 47.430542,35.827070 (

                https://i.imgur.com/BtBerIi.jpg

                Maybe not exactly what everybody's looking for, but interesting nonetheless: these are the fortifications on that map south of Robotyne, north of Novoprokopivka, geolocated to 47.430542,35.827070
                The report I read is that the explosion in the pic was part of the AFU's trench-clearing, and that they've already held it and moved further. All the chatter on Russian Telegram that Robotyne is "still in the grey zone" appears to be just that (meaningless chatter), and the AFU's rate of advance looks like it's increasing.

                ) is 14.85km, and the Oryx's visually-confirmed losses count mobility kills of equipment that was later retrieved and repaired, IIRC.
                The other thing to take into account is that these are the heaviest-prepared defenses the RuAF had to offer -- multiple km of heavy mining, pre-sighted arty, and some serious counterattacking trying to force the Ukrainians back to their start lines. Even if they damaged a bunch of Bradleys, the Russian Ground Forces haven't been able to reverse the AFU's progress, just slow it down. Bite-and-hold might not be as kino for spectators as last summer's tempoposting, but so far it seems to be working.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Most of that advance wasn't 47th and the Bradley, they were halted and rotated at Robotyne.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Proof?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Will buff out in the wash

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I genuinely didn't know and the jannies went and deleted my post lmao

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >I genuinely didn't know
        did you miss dozen threads Vatniks made about it?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          I logged on and there is one thread at bump limit way down. Everything else is deleted.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            That just means the picture was spammed. It won’t bring that destroyed challenger back

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >I logged on and
            > "logged on" to PrepHole
            I don't know what face I when for this.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >not using logged on as a term for going online because your birth year probably starts with a 2 and you have never heard a dial up tone

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              There was a time, very long ago, in which looking at a website was called "logging on [to it]".
              That's not the same as "loggin in" which you did (and still do) with an account on a website.

              Either he is a geriatric or an ESL.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              back in 2000 when i got broadband i had to login to access it every day
              sometimes i still think of using the internet as going online or logging in/on

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, vatBlack folk have been spamming it relentlessly. The jannies are on a hair trigger right now.

  32. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Bradley's poor service record posted
    >Immediate samegayging spam about Challengers
    The shills are here and they want you to buy more Bradleys

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Liberator of robotyne

  33. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >IFVs
    >Bradley M2A2 (182) - Lost (53) - (29%) - US made
    >YPR-765 (196) - Lost (48) - (24%) - US based design
    >CV90 (50) - Lost (3) - (6%) - Swedish made
    >KTO Rosomak (200) - Lost (1) - (0.5%) - Polish made
    >Marder (40) - Lost (0) - (0%) - German made
    Just a coincidence I'm sure

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Higher usage of US IFVs? That's the only thing I can think of. I don't think any of the other IFVs can eat an ATGM or an artillery shell and survive, where Bradley couldn't.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        You think a Bradley could eat an arty round or an atgm lol?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          No that’s why he said where Bradley couldn’t. Meaning that a kornet that killed a bradley would kill any other IFV but Ukraine is using Bradleys more than any other western armor.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            He typed in a fricked up way, probably esl.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      It is no coincidence that the US made gear is seeing more combat. They’re just better

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Have they sent the Rosomaks over yet? Or is it just announced? (Very round number provided)

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        100 sent over in 2023 and 100 to be sent over later
        I think it's a order from a contractor rather than a donation so should arrive piecemeal

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Higher usage of US IFVs? That's the only thing I can think of. I don't think any of the other IFVs can eat an ATGM or an artillery shell and survive, where Bradley couldn't.

      The YPR-765 is what makes it weird. It's a Dutch IFV based on the M113 so it shouldn't be heavily used like the Bradley

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >It's a Dutch IFV based on the M113 so it shouldn't be heavily used like the Bradley
        it has been used since Kherson

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Its an American IFV variant that is as based on the M113 as the Bradley, donated by the Dutch. You're a European tourist who knows nothing about military vehicles.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      We win again CV 90 bros

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Rosomaks are harder to operate than bradley but prolly the msot resistant to the mines
      anyone who saw them drive through goatfrickers mines in iraq knows that, so maybe they're saving them for harder pushes

  34. 10 months ago
    Anonymous
  35. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    When did they lose the Challenger?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yesterday is when the first one was confirmed. Not sure when they lost it but it

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      BBC report that all the crew survived.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        forgot pic

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          "Damaged" is awfully generous. But can a crew really survive the damage that we saw? Did it burn that way after the crew evacuated?

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's intact but on fire. Could well just be the engine rather than crew compartment. There is no real damage (as a cause) that's visible, so it could have caught fire later. It could have been abandoned and then shelled hours later, we just don't know.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          "damaged"

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >literally who quotes source
          This isn’t the same as the bbc saying it. Alternatively
          >British state media does damage control

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            That's the BBC's defence corespondent moron.

            The BBC is also not state media - it's publicly funded by the license fee and the government of the day has no operational control.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              So the line you are going with is the tank is only damaged and all Ceres survived because the bbc told you. That’s some pretty potent cope

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Is having trustworthy press is a foreign concept to you?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                The turret has been rotated to the side which is standard practice for bailing out to make life easier on the driver. The vehicle is on fire but not structurally compromised/destroyed. It's probably unlikely to return to service if that fire was in the crew compartment - because it would eventually blow up. Thick black smoke is probably rubber and diesel in the engine compartment burning which is a big job but recoverable in a workshop with appropriate supplies.

                The Ukrainians say the crew survived, the evidence points to that too. There is no evidence of a catastrophic explosion that would kill the crew.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The turret has been rotated to the side which is standard practice for bailing out to make life easier on the driver.

                I hadn't even thought of this.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              You are arguing against a person that doesn't know what "freedom of the press" means because they never experienced it. For them, everything that the media says is directly controlled by the state.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            [...]

            >Consistently top 5 most trusted news outlet in the world
            Pipe down vatnik

  36. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Challenger 2 has never been lost to enemy fire.
    >1 was lost to a friendly fire incident
    >Turns out the one in Ukraine was also lost to friendly fire.
    kek

  37. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >massive
    Just a tad hyperbolic

  38. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Anon, you're projecting again. This behavior weakens your position and makes your supervisor angry.
    Do you want an angry supervisor?

  39. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >delicious cope

    People usually say this when I've just delivered an argument they can't counter. Sorry if you thought hull ammo meant turret popping like a t-72

  40. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine having to call everyone that states a not defeatist speculation about the state of a burning tank a "coper" because you can't fathom that a burning tank is not a complete loss like some soviet shitbox.

    Those people need help, they are clearly mentally challenged and should not have access to the internet.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      The tank is lost, no question about it, but I guess it can’t be written off as destroyed until it’s recovered by either side

  41. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I remember the twin towers falling down and being structurally destroyed. So far we have a fire and a spare fuel tank that's fallen off being the extent of the physical damage.

  42. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    It’s a total loss

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      How do you know?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Sources familiar with the matter. Same as the nobody tweeter

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Gotcha. Is this dude by the name Imadeit Thefrickup with you right now? I would like to know why he is being such a colossal homosexual.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      The footage only appeared in the last 12 hours, the chances are it’s destroyed but the vehicle is likely yet to have been recovered and inspected so it’s being reported as damaged

  43. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine got Leos 1? I thought that deal got stuck

  44. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Russians are dying by the hundreds every day.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >source: my ass

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >cry and kvetch about the hundreds of fresh new webms of dead Russians posted every single day
        >um aktchually you have no source*~~)

  45. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I wonder which foreign supplied vehicles will get the most praise after the war. I know they really like the bushmasters so far. Anything else?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Wait, they can repair these things after a mine hit? To have the occupants alive after a hit is allready damn impressive, but repair them after a hit? That fast? Really? Those russian anti tank mines are no joke

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          The glowing review in the post you're replying to is just one of many. Ukrainian troops have been floored by the protection the Bradley offers, and when you consider crew survivability vs. the Soviet gear they were used to it's not hard to see it as a contender for their MVP award when the war ends.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Not unique to Bradleys.Mines are often survivable in armored vehicles.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Challenger has usually been repaired pretty quick after mine/IED blasts. The hudrogas suspension packs are far easier to swap out than a torsion bar.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        IDK why people make a big deal about this. Most of those many, many videos of Russians driving into mines show obviously quite alive men jumping out of them right after, so clearly they protect people to some extent. The ones where there is cook off and the crew appears dead were mostly javelin kills or direct artillery hits. But a Bradley crew is also in grave danger with an ATGM hit and no tank is going to be good after a direct 155mm hit, nor is the crew likely to fare well.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Have you tried reading that text? He literally says any time BMP hits a mine there are casualties.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            What autistic incel makes images like that?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Probably the Bradley. It’s seen the most extensive use as far as western ground vehicles go

  46. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Warriortard, how upset are you that 47th Brigade are using SACLOS MANPADS to shoot down KA-52?

    >https://twitter.com/Osinttechnical/status/1699035784827826365

  47. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Germany finished restarting domestic 35mm Gepard ammo production. They just announced it. Frick you switzerland. Fricking frick you. Your MIC can die for all I care.

  48. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Leopard 2A6 (21) - Lost (9) - (43%)
    >Leopard 2A4 (54) - Lost (7) - (13%)
    It's 3 destroyed of each the others are kist damaged.

  49. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Anon, stop using the internet, I want to call someone!

  50. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    It's neither, you tried though.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      The BBC is state media. I'm sorry you've been made moronic by propaganda.

      >one Bradley Destroyed or damaged for every 100m of advance
      This sounds exaggerated, Anon. The distance from Orikhiv to the geolocated defense works at 47.430542,35.827070 ( [...] ) is 14.85km, and the Oryx's visually-confirmed losses count mobility kills of equipment that was later retrieved and repaired, IIRC.
      The other thing to take into account is that these are the heaviest-prepared defenses the RuAF had to offer -- multiple km of heavy mining, pre-sighted arty, and some serious counterattacking trying to force the Ukrainians back to their start lines. Even if they damaged a bunch of Bradleys, the Russian Ground Forces haven't been able to reverse the AFU's progress, just slow it down. Bite-and-hold might not be as kino for spectators as last summer's tempoposting, but so far it seems to be working.

      Ukraine has less manpower. The real question isn't how many toys and weapons Ukraine has. It's warm bodies. If these attacks clawing back territory cost a lot of lives then Ukraine would lose the war of attrition. It's why I'm baffled at the insistence on counter attacking.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        The BBC is not funded by the government and the government have no control over it's content. Sorry that you can't understand that, but it's why the BBC is probably the most respected news organisation on the planet.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          And paying the fee for the BBC is legally mandated. So it is supported by taxpayers of the class that have TVs. So it is state funded. I'm sorry your brain has rotted.

          I generally trust the bbc. But it's absolutely and without a doubt state media.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >And paying the fee for the BBC is legally mandated.

            Only if you use it.

            The state isn't responsible for collection.

            >but it's why the BBC is probably the most respected news organisation on the planet
            bongs have reached a level of delusion usually reserved for Russians

            Or maybe you can't understand how the BBC works?

            [...]

            Misc and American politics has rotted your brain. The BBC is about as balanced as you get.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >but it's why the BBC is probably the most respected news organisation on the planet
          bongs have reached a level of delusion usually reserved for Russians

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          The three most influential news agencies globally are the Agence France Press (AFP), Reuters, and the Associated Press

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Agence France Press
            No they arent lmao

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              BBC didn’t even make the list kek

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The list i made in my head
                I bet the daily mail did tho amirite kek RT too?

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            BBC didn’t even make the list kek

            [...]

            [...]

            Is this a bot?

  51. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Google search top 5 trusted news sites
    >BBC in every one at varying places
    Soooo you going to reply to

    >The list i made in my head
    I bet the daily mail did tho amirite kek RT too?

    yeh? Nah didnt think so John Smith from Delaware

  52. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >I put more faith in al jeerza even foxnews are they are pretty trash

    Americans think the BBC is better than fox or CNN, not that it's a high bar.

  53. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    How can it be state media when it's not funded through taxation or by the states budget?

    Are all cooperative businesses state funded?

  54. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Its state media
    >No it isnt
    >Its not even trustworthy
    >Yes it is
    >Its state media
    The circle jerk continues

  55. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Laser pig says it was set on fire deliberately to deny it to the enemy.

  56. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    How can something be state media when the governments of the day have no editorial powers, no ability to sack people, no ability to alter budgets or set programing? The BBC spend most of their time playing devil's advocate and putting the opposing view to whoever they are interviewong, they do it very well. We've all seen Ben Shaorio get humiliated by a right wing presenter (Andrew neil) because he couldn't figure out how adults debate and are able to put forward arguments they don't hold.

  57. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >People go nuts when a Leopard or Challanger is destroyed
    >No comment on 53 lost Bradleys

  58. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    It isn’t. It’s being used more than any other western armored box and OP is counting damaged as lost

  59. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >broke the backbone of Russian main defensive line
    >made Vatniks hallucinate that they still hold hold Robotyne and there's none at Verbove
    >lost only 30 Bradleys destroyed and some 20 damaged
    >did poorly

  60. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    This isn’t based on reality. This is a coping mechanism

  61. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is that a Challenger 2 ?

  62. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I´m sure they did really well in that offensive
    thats why they fired the MoD at the end of it
    and they winning an /k/, too

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Does that mean The Russia will finally stop retreating?

  63. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >nah, they would never stop retreating
    Yeah I figured
    Have a nice day

  64. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >fire pocket
    don't you think it's sad that you've adopted the way Russians speak, even if you do simp for them?
    Do you not have pride in your own language?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *