Ukraine Military Intelligence Chief Budanov: Russia likely to run out of military tools by end of spring.

Ukraine Military Intelligence Chief Budanov: Russia likely to run out of ‘military tools’ by end of spring.

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >i unironically think these braindead fricking threads are made by vatBlack folk so they can later point at them and seethe about "/k/ope"
    this has literally been their MO since the feint, anon

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    https://thehill.com/policy/international/3885893-wagner-chief-warns-of-collapse-of-russian-frontline-if-there-is-retreat-from-bakhmut/

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I didn't know the jannies on this site were such colossal gays now that we can't even announce a sage. Regardless, that article still has nothing to do with the original post. Yevgeny Prigozhin is a fricking clown. He stomps his feet and he whines because he knows the ongoing professionalization effort is cutting into his slice of the pie. Putin gave him and the Russian milblogger community leeway in vocal dissent but is walking it back as his need for them decreases. They make statements like this in retaliation. Use your fricking brain you mouth breather.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >professionalization effort
        Effort?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Announcing a sage has been a banable offense for at least a decade.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine’s really coping about losing thousands of men in bakhmut for nothing huh

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      True, russian lives are worth nothing so the math checks out

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      7-1

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I saw this in another thread. What reliable causality estimates do we have for the battle on either side?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Difficult, if not impossible, to find an impartial answer at this point in time. The casualty rate is the center of the misinformation campaign for everyone. One thing is certain, there are many casualties.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          3:1 is the norm for a defender
          5:1 is the norm if the defender is heavily dug in in reinforced strongpoints
          7:1 is the norm if the defender is dug in and the attacker lacks the appropriate tools to deal with it.

          Battles having high casualty rates for both sides is fairly new in warfare and only really became a thing with gunpowder. In Medieval warfare and prior, when one side won they WON and casualty rates were regularly 10:1 and beyond. So it's certainly not unthinkable in a modern conflict as well if one of the two sides is just completely unprepared and also on the offensive.

          There is a reason why back in the day a small castle with like 12 guys inside would justify a siege with hundreds of soldiers required to maintain it.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You can unironically get more than a 7:1 ratio in urban warfare.
            It can be an absolute slog and a half of prepared positions, mines, etc. Launched drones are especially effective due to static positions barely 100 meters from the front yet protected etc.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You can unironically get more than a 7:1 ratio in urban warfare.
            It can be an absolute slog and a half of prepared positions, mines, etc. Launched drones are especially effective due to static positions barely 100 meters from the front yet protected etc.

            You can unironically get more than a 7:1 ratio in urban warfare.
            It can be an absolute slog and a half of prepared positions, mines, etc. Launched drones are especially effective due to static positions barely 100 meters from the front yet protected etc.

            I thought this was an interesting read, from last april. I wonder what the ratio in this particular battle was. Apologizes for how bad the translations are.

            I imagine things are .... about the same now in terms of tactics? Even worse?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Men aren't the issue. Both sides are by my calculations 5-8 years off from reaching manpower depletion if we were to take the most dire of estimates for either side. Naturally this has to be qualified with the fact that Russia stubbornly refuses to take the L and just call this a fricking war already, and are still dealing with limited conscription.

      Its specialists and tactical supplies. Tanks, IFVs, artillery, rockets, heli's and their respective operators is something that Russia has been burning through at a terrifying rate, even when the number of drivers they can actually field was the primary bottleneck to how many IFV's they can field.

      They've also burned a lot of training capability by sending in their fricking intstructors, which is why we are seeing video's of vastly overqualified staff conducting BCT. Which means that they cannot reconstitute a lot of these specialist losses.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >‘military tools
    I thought they were called 'mobiks'?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They can always recruit more men, but the Russians have lost the ability to make more combat shovels.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        we hear something like this every other day and yet russia is still winning

        >shovel meme

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >russia is still winning
          Winning what?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Most hated nation on earth.
            >Worst leadership decisions made since the 1940's
            >First Nation to become just a foot note in history since the Ottoman empire

            All of the above

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >russia is still winning
          you zigger trash keep repeating that like programmed zombies. can we see it?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >winning
          I think you meant to say "whining".

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Chmobiks go faster than they arrive, here's an example. Mobiks arrived on 2nd to Donetsk, then sent to storm Avdiivka or Marinka, this is what left of them after 3 days of fighting, they had 110 men

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >2 more months
    yeah. okay.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >2 more weeks

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Another incoming gesture of good will?

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    xaxaxaxa

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What happened to the Kiev front after that though?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The did collapse on an entire front though lmao. Literally several thousands of KM lost.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >moron doesn't understand that the second figure is going through obituary records and counting names of those reported KIA

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      He knows. He's been posting that image multiple times and has already gotten called out for his bullshit.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >some reporter collects public obituaries and visits graveyards to check for new military graves
    >couldn't even check half of graveyards in Puccia
    >doesn't even count mercenaries or drafted prisoners(because they get no obituaries or proper burial)
    >even though Russia does everything in its power to hide KIA numbers, issuing moratorium on number of bodies that morgue can give up per day
    >not even counting bodies they deliberately keep in Ukraine as long as possible to hide number of dead
    >not even counting LDPR dead
    >still managed to fight 16000 fricking dead
    Y-yeah, it's all good for Russia

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Let's also remember what happened to most of those who died on the Moskva.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    How can you simply take a number and run with it without even questioning it? Even Rybar admitted that the VDV lost 22k February-September 2022 alone. Do you even know where the 16k number comes from?

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    https://nitter.nl/KilledInUkraine

    Those are just officers. And not even all of them.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      and Ukraine lost 200’000 officers according to the EU.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        EU is a civilian organization with no intelligence capacity. It does not know a shit from frick.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        That's the most absurd claim I've seen here on this board about the Russian War in Ukraine. In order to have lost 200,000 officers, the Ukrainians would've either had to have to promoted every single soldier to an officer role, or mobilized upwards to 4 million combatants.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >That's the most absurd claim I've seen here on this board about the Russian War

          They have killed 3 NATO and 2 Zelinski remember anon?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Ah yes, I forgot about the 10,000 SAS spec ops in Ukraine as well.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            and 2 boris johnsons

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      As much as I enjoy watching Ukraine win I liked the early part of the war when they were getting their shit pushed in just enough that the Russian senior officers were on the front lines getting blown up every day. That was fricking hilarious.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >at least 16k
    you don't know how to read vatnik?

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *