That doesn't really matter, turret is the thinnest and the weakest spot on all MBTs. That’s why top-attack munitions exist: because all tanks have thin roof armour.
It depends on the variant of the Lancet. The vast majority of them are only packing HE or HE-frag payloads which don't really do much to tanks or armored vehicles.
HEAT armed ones do exist, but I don't recall actually seeing any of those in action.
homie rpg 28 and 29 were the only things that could reliably penetrate the chally. Lmao and it made the British MoD shit it's pants. Lmao. Abrams were getting raped in gulf war 2. The challys if used smartly would be super dangerous though
In a world where you wake up and see the military you put your entire heart and soul into supporting getting chewed to pieces so bad that you have to rely on human waves of convicts, 17 destroyed Abrams becomes 20,000 so you don’t have a nice day.
This particular psychological disorder has in some countries been called “being a homosexual” and in others “being Indian”. These cases are indistinguishable,
Well there are a lot of them anon. It's only natural that few of them will be shot down. My question is how many of them is hitting the target?? Why do you think nato is sending all these vehicle?? Where are ukrainian vehicle?? I think deep down in your heart you know the answer of these question as much as i do 😉
>My question is how many of them is hitting the target?? Why do you think nato is sending all these vehicle?? Where are ukrainian vehicle??
In your pondering you did not think to say to yourself, "hey, the Ukrainians have been mobilizing and training hundreds of thousands of people over the last year", of course they want more vehicles.. If they took zero losses they'd want more vehicles, their army has expanding.
>has expanding
Was expanding. The battle of soledar already reduce much of their number and the battle of bakhmut will further reduce the number of their troops.
>horrifying loses in every battle since February.
And that is true. The battle of soledar is the one that tip the scale where number of casualties is bigger than the number of newly trained recuits.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>And that is true
Proofs?
1 year ago
Anonymous
Anon, you have piece of technology called israelitegle. Use it!!! Oh, and stop searching 'news' that pander ukraine. It's time for you to see both side of this war.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>bunch of cope and no proofs
Thanks RussBlack person.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Is there a place I can go to see news Western Media is burying so I can be obliged mucho?
You gay can laugh all you want but when the war is over you will see who is right.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Russia's loss is baked in at this point. There's literally nothing that can be done to turn this around. It's just a matter of how much Russia loses.
Please keep fighting, we want you to lose a lot.
1 year ago
Anonymous
We can afford to lose a lot, you westoid can't. So i guess we'll win this one anon.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>We can afford to lose a lot,
That's good, because you're going to whether you want to or not.
1 year ago
Anonymous
The "westoids" didnt lose yet any soldiers in this conflict.
Only some cold war weapons and vehicles that were gathering dust in some warehouses.
Looking forward to the Leo and Chally dashcam vids ripping through Donetsk.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Is there a place I can go to see news Western Media is burying so I can be obliged mucho?
A only know of a RPG-29 frontal lower glacis hit and penetration which is not that surprising given the stated 750mm RPG-29 pen.
I think they've added applique armor on that spot since then.
>western MBT developed in the late 1980s and getting close to the end of its service life >wunderwaffen
It's weird to think we were ever scared of the Russians.
>One of Russia's newest guided weapon >Does top-attack against a tank designed in the early 60's. >Slightly bends one of the smoke grenade launcher mounts.
How can we hope to counter this, NATO bros?
Pretty much. I think the Soviets had parrellel developments, but the T-72B's turret armor looks very similar to the documents we have on the Chobham armor arrays
lancet cant penetrate MBTs you moron
even vatniks in the field have stated this
So a 3kg Lancet's HEAT warhead can't pen a few inches of MBT's turret roof/engine deck armor, while the NLAW with a 1,8kg HEAT warhead somehow can?
I think that Chally 2 can't be penned that simply by a RPG-28 or a gayot. On paper it seems really well armored.
The T-72 was a piece of shit back when it was new, it's not surprising it's getting skull fricked.
That doesn't really matter, turret is the thinnest and the weakest spot on all MBTs. That’s why top-attack munitions exist: because all tanks have thin roof armour.
It depends on the variant of the Lancet. The vast majority of them are only packing HE or HE-frag payloads which don't really do much to tanks or armored vehicles.
HEAT armed ones do exist, but I don't recall actually seeing any of those in action.
homie rpg 28 and 29 were the only things that could reliably penetrate the chally. Lmao and it made the British MoD shit it's pants. Lmao. Abrams were getting raped in gulf war 2. The challys if used smartly would be super dangerous though
>Lmao. Abrams were getting raped in gulf war 2
Are you living in an alternate reality?They had like what 17 Abrams that were damaged beyond repair?
In a world where you wake up and see the military you put your entire heart and soul into supporting getting chewed to pieces so bad that you have to rely on human waves of convicts, 17 destroyed Abrams becomes 20,000 so you don’t have a nice day.
This particular psychological disorder has in some countries been called “being a homosexual” and in others “being Indian”. These cases are indistinguishable,
you also said I couldn't penetrate your mother so I have a hard time believing what you say
Wouldn't you have to be straight to do that? I'm skeptical.
I'm not convinced that any of these still exist. Seems like they were all used in Spring and they're just slow trickling thr footage.
Why would you waste a lancet when you can simply use rpg-28 or a gayot?
Lancets get shot down by small arms and spasm without radar lol
Well there are a lot of them anon. It's only natural that few of them will be shot down. My question is how many of them is hitting the target?? Why do you think nato is sending all these vehicle?? Where are ukrainian vehicle?? I think deep down in your heart you know the answer of these question as much as i do 😉
>My question is how many of them is hitting the target?? Why do you think nato is sending all these vehicle?? Where are ukrainian vehicle??
In your pondering you did not think to say to yourself, "hey, the Ukrainians have been mobilizing and training hundreds of thousands of people over the last year", of course they want more vehicles.. If they took zero losses they'd want more vehicles, their army has expanding.
>has expanding
Was expanding. The battle of soledar already reduce much of their number and the battle of bakhmut will further reduce the number of their troops.
So ukie army was expanding right until soledar? Vatniks told me ukies were taking horrifying loses in every battle since February. How could it be?
>horrifying loses in every battle since February.
And that is true. The battle of soledar is the one that tip the scale where number of casualties is bigger than the number of newly trained recuits.
>And that is true
Proofs?
Anon, you have piece of technology called israelitegle. Use it!!! Oh, and stop searching 'news' that pander ukraine. It's time for you to see both side of this war.
>bunch of cope and no proofs
Thanks RussBlack person.
You gay can laugh all you want but when the war is over you will see who is right.
Russia's loss is baked in at this point. There's literally nothing that can be done to turn this around. It's just a matter of how much Russia loses.
Please keep fighting, we want you to lose a lot.
We can afford to lose a lot, you westoid can't. So i guess we'll win this one anon.
>We can afford to lose a lot,
That's good, because you're going to whether you want to or not.
The "westoids" didnt lose yet any soldiers in this conflict.
Only some cold war weapons and vehicles that were gathering dust in some warehouses.
Looking forward to the Leo and Chally dashcam vids ripping through Donetsk.
Is there a place I can go to see news Western Media is burying so I can be obliged mucho?
Cope
Ukraine would have to lose the town nobody had heard of until last week before they can take it back.
>russia still hasn't taken Soledar
>On paper
Found your mistake anon. Did you know that challenger 2 get penned by RPG-7 in middle east?
A only know of a RPG-29 frontal lower glacis hit and penetration which is not that surprising given the stated 750mm RPG-29 pen.
I think they've added applique armor on that spot since then.
It also took 70+ RPG hits and was fine. A Tiger II was penned by an M8 Greyhound. Shit happens in war.
>pussia has STILL not taken Soledar
Is this the most embarrassing performance in the history of warfare?
>western MBT developed in the late 1980s and getting close to the end of its service life
>wunderwaffen
It's weird to think we were ever scared of the Russians.
I'll go ahead and post your fake Lancet videos for you, Pajeet-kun
fricking hell, the epitome of all russian victories
Lancet cant even destroy ancient T-64s
Forgot pic cause I'm a moron
Proof that damage is caused by lancet?? For all we know that burn could be caused by friendly fire from stugna.
https://t.me/TyskNIP/3481
ah yes the secret new top attack stugna
what do you mean, it absolutely obliterated one smoke grenade launcher, and possibly disable another one
>One of Russia's newest guided weapon
>Does top-attack against a tank designed in the early 60's.
>Slightly bends one of the smoke grenade launcher mounts.
How can we hope to counter this, NATO bros?
Much obliterated
>Lancet is a Wunder-ACK
here another subhuman for the picture, also dennis face fits perfectly into this ocean of mongol subhumans
Our glorious Lancet was defeated by dark magic western technology called "camouflage net". This is what the west is trying to hide
is that parcel tape?
Looks like glass fiber strengthened tape we use at work.
HELLO SIR!
The Russians know all about it anyways
Pretty much. I think the Soviets had parrellel developments, but the T-72B's turret armor looks very similar to the documents we have on the Chobham armor arrays