Seriously, this is getting embarrassing bros. How can we bring our military up to par with China and Russia.
U.S FAILS hypersonic missile test
Seriously, this is getting embarrassing bros. How can we bring our military up to par with China and Russia.
OP FAILSto stop sucking dozens of wieners for 5 seconds.
Seriously, this is getting embarrassing.
Ya well..... their scientists aren't gender inclusive as ours!!!!!
Implessive, with single stloke of luck and loinpower, People's republic
No, I guess it's over. One thing, though. Can you show me Russia or China's scramjet engine? Just want to compare the superior design to America's, ya know?
>Here from 1968: A BGRV was launched on February 26, 1968, from Vandenberg Air Force Base by an Atlas F to the area of Wake Island in the Pacific, collecting data that proved valuable in developing later maneuvering reentry vehicles.
Link: https://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/B/BGRV.html
>HyFly Mach 6 Scramjet Missile Test
Link: https://thefutureofthings.com/5667-hyfly-mach-6-scramjet-missile-test/
>HIFIRE/HyCAUSE Scramjet Mach-8+ success with Australia/USA collaboration 2017
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovKipc5LpCU
>Advancing Hypersonics –Aerojet Rocketdyne’s Scramjet Engine Makes Hypersonics History
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YJyBf8x83Q
>Hypersonic missile successfully hits Ronald Reagan
MACH8 Link: https://www.theregister.com/Print/2011/11/18/hypersonic_weapon_pacific_test/
>In November 2011, AHW was launched from the Pacific Missile Range Facility in Kauai, Hawaii, to the Reagan Test Site on the Marshall Islands. The glide vehicle successfully hit the target, which is located about 3,700km away from the launch site.
Link: https://www.army-technology.com/projects/advanced-hypersonic-weapon-ahw/
>Department of Defense Tests Hypersonic Glide Body March 2020
Link: https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/2119458/department-of-defense-tests-hypersonic-glide-body/
Short vid in this link: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/35369/army-shows-first-ever-footage-of-new-hypersonic-missile-in-flight-and-impacting
HVGs:
>X-43A
>HTV-2
>X-51
I'm kinda interested, how did you compile this post in this little, did you have it ready? I'm genuinely asking because I'd like to know more, I didn't mean it as a gotcha
Black person you know how many Chyna Roosha Stronk Hypersonik threads we've had for years anon. Fricking newbie.
>did you have it ready?
Yes, after the many, many, many threads I just saved it as a pasta doc for when it's inevitably posted again. Though, I enjoy reading and learning about the tech needed for hypersonic flight, which allowed me to make the pasta in the first place.
http://www.astronautix.com/b/boostglider-entryvehicle.html
Oh, so you're a brainlet that has never heard of ASSET, PRIME, or BGRV from the 60s? Launched as part of the American Advanced Ballistic Re-Entry System (ABRES) Project, starting in 1963? Here it is atop an Atlas F ready for launch. Check ever source I have, please, and get back to me, smoothbrain.
Here's some more on the ABRES program for you, brainlet:
http://www.astronautix.com/a/abres.html#:~:text=ABRES&text
https://minutemanmissile.com/documents/ReentryVehicleDesignAndPhysics.pdf
https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb249/doc05.pdf
>What do you mean by that?
It means he's seething because he got BTFO, yet, again.
ASSET
More ASSET.
ASSET mounted atop a THOR missile ready for launch.
ASSET ready to launch.
Not now boner, not at work
Vid here, but Boeing are israelites and won't put it on israelitetube.
https://secure.boeingimages.com/archive/Launch-of-ASSET-Re-entry-Vehicle-2JRSXLJJ2BLT.html
i don't see any vid. Where's the proof lmao? any pic like what the chinese has showed? Anything at all? or it's just "trust me bro."
>any pic like what the chinese has showed?
What video has China shown? Click on the pic of ASSET (see pic).
Then, you will get a pop out page. Click the video to play. You do know how to do that, Zhang Ye? Again, this is from 1963-65.
oh wow very implessive. If you didn't tell me that it was a top sekret high tech scam jet launch I would've thought it was some kind of chinese commercial launch.
kek
>proof is wiki written by outsourced pajeet
i kneel.
kek
>If you didn't tell me that it was a top sekret high tech scam jet launch
I didn't. Where did you pull that from? Just learning Engrish, Wang Wei? Scramjets are here:
i asked for proof of the scam jet and some moronic posted that. Learn engrish Black.
and I still don't see that famous scam jet. where is the trajectory showed that is not a straight line or a commercial satellite launch?
don't bother. You won't find any. Mutts have never had it. Otherwise, they would not be failing like a bunch of apes they are doing right now kek.
>i asked for proof of the scam jet and some moronic posted that.
I posted it, in reply to this post:
. Is this your first time on 4chinz? You seem completely lost. Also, I gave you videos, picture, etc. for the US scramjet proof here:
and
. Do you want test documents, too?
Now, where is that Chinese video at? Can you show me one working scramjet made in Chiner?
End of HiFiRE with a family photo.
2/3rds of my military career was being surrounded by boomer contractors in plaid shirts arguing amongst themselves over equipment 3 levels above my skill grade, nodding occasionally and hoping to god they didn't ask for anything more complex than a torque wrench. I know exactly how that soldier feels, and it's a mix of: wow that's pretty cool and please don't ask me to explain that to someone else.
>BOB SHUT THE FRICK UP ABOUT YOUR GRANDKID AND HURRY THE FRICK UP. MY FEET HURT, AND IT'S HOT!
kek, yeah no one wants to listen to Bob the Boomer tell you about "his 4th wife, the Mexican, no the oriental one..." at 1659 on a Friday night but pointing a flashlight while everyone else police calls the fricking desert for pvt snuffy's missing round is unfathomably based
>"his 4th wife, the Mexican, no the oriental one..."
>I'm tellin' ya, brother. This on is a keeper!
>Imported here from some prostitute house in Cambodia.
>You know the girls run around topless there at - get this - thirteen!
Sounds pretty comfy, tbh.
Some favorites:
>I ain't getting paid that much
Sir, you got more in 2 weeks in per diem (travel) then I make in 2 months
>Oh yeah lol
>Frick 'em bro, just tell your ncos to suck a dick. What are they gonna do about it.
UCMJ me to death?
When was the last time you went home you ornery old frick?
>*pauses* that's how they get you to pay alimony anon, never let them know where you are.
>Welp, frick you, I'm going home
You can't do that I'm a Staff s-
>I'm a civilian, frick you
>This'll be my second retirement, 25 years here at X and I left the army as a light col
JFC bill, go the frick home, you've made enough fricking money
>Back in my day the only women allowed on base wer-
Sir! No! You're the only one who knows how the *flux capacitor* works, and they'll skullfrick me to death for hearing sharp shit with females in the area
nice. I didn't know that a scam jet needs only ground testing xD
very implessive kek
They all flew, brainlet. Are you going to continue the cope, or are you going to post that Chiner scramjet video you claimed to have?
You are based. In every post you BTFO some homosexual with multiple sources. I love it.
I'll give him sources all day. I just want that video of the Chiner scramjet he claims they have.
Water cooled nose cone for ICBM RVs. Pretty neat. Pushes water through small holes at ~3000+PSI.
Flight profile of the AMaRV used on Minuteman missiles.
>first link
look like a random commercial launch
implessive. I bet the rest is just as implessive so I didn't bother kek
maybe engish is not your first language but i asked for scam jet. all your vids were just scam but no jet. Captions and clapping don't make scam jet.
Show me something like this.
protip: you can't.
wait what the frick?
BEST CORER isn't included in B&R?
Maybe you should read sometimes?
This is the X-51A
Research Papers concerning HIFire:
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA605731
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318143977_HIFiRE-5b_Flight_Overview
Papers are better because we have something concrete to rely on and have data itself on the whole thing.
Black person, Is all you can do is parrot replies I gave you back? You really are a chinsect, aren't you? Glorified made in Chiner Xerox machines. I gave you all the proof you wanted, you just choose to ignore 99% of it and focus on the 1% you think you can israelite your way out of. You do know what the X-43A, and X-51 are don't you? They happen to be the platforms Chiner always uses for your CGI of MUH CHINER IS OF HALF SCLAMJET!
Now, where is that ONE video of Chiners scramjet?
>muh Blue Dot network
you dipshit the Blue dot network evolved to become the B3W which is now the PGII, Australia alone has already signed infrastrcutre deals with all the pacific nations under its AIFFP.
>evolved
lmao
Holy shit I recognize this image name. This is Armatard! The REAL Armatard! I thought he'd been conscripted!
https://desuarchive.org/k/search/filename/%20rigid.jpg/
cheezus crisp you're right
I love the amount of detective work that goes into completely pointless tard wrangling.
Armatard lives in the USA or Canada though, doubt he would shill so delusional for Russia if he actually had to live there.
Where is the Chinese video, Ping Ye? A Chinese scramjet in a tunnel testing will even do.
LRHW is real and you can see it on various gov docs. And C-HGB is real too. If you bother to check the links inside the wiki, it wouldn't be too hard.
>BGRV
Here is the flight profile of the maneuvering capabilities of the BGRV.
Here is PRIME.
Yeah but what about China's rail pistols, which have made missiles obsolete?
It's because he's the OP too.
It's how you dumb down your opposition and make them look dumber.
You make a thread with a argument that can be easily countered, then post the reply you've prepared beforehand that looks impressive compared to the OP.
That's literally all the "vatnig" threads too.
Black person, I'm nit the moronic OP. Go KYS, you smoothbrained shitskin Serb.
It's always the same dumb homosexual that makes this same argument. Shame to see you still live.
>Shame to see you still live.
He's too stupid to die.
Fricking kek
>https://www.daviddarling.info
>https://thefutureofthings.com
you're a moron and living proof that no one checks the source
What do you mean by that?
I am not a newbie. I just use /k/ for other things. Like, you know, camo and stuff
The posts that kill the thread
implessive
I like the part where the scramjet is tested on the ground xD
>WE WUZZZ HYPERSONIGSS
Enjoy being grounded forever, Major Mao.
>musk
may as well ask Xi for help kek
Musk is a patriot and has been launching classified payloads for almost 15 years. Go be a troony elsewhere.
the frick? did some esl write that title or something?
Almost all news articles in English give the impression they were written by ESLs/autistics/downies/genuine morons/have no idea what the frick they are talking about etc these days. It's especially obvious when reading science and tech related articles in my experience, unless you read from actual scientific journals and scholarly publications.
Because yknow
they were written by indian or SEA college students
The scramjet - ine of many, was tested in air, on a flying platform. You do know what the X-43A, X-51, and the gambit of HyCAUSE, HyFly, and HiFiRE are, right? All scramjets flown, rhar produce more thrust than drag. Or are you just an ignorant, seething chinsect mad Chiner can't fly one scramjet?
Also, why the frick is that bug so ugly?
He posts it in every hypersonic thread. I gotta assume it is one of his betters it something.
It's the bug prostitute who said, "brack hands", so, I guess she's supposed to be based, or something. She's fricking ugly with a Black person nose and low caste Asian skin.
Chinese value bright skin, they just don't know that the entire thinks it looks sickly. She also has a shit ton of makeup, on top of shitty video filters
Why are like 98% of Asian women comparable to literal dogs. Good God
You are what you eat.
?t=93
just because it works somewhat doesn't mean it works good enough for practical use
still no operational weapons system
You still haven't shown Chiners, Wei Ye.
ARRW is one weapons system fielded exclusively by the Air Force. Launch vehicles and equipment for the Army program (Dark Eagle) were received earlier this year and IOC is set to be achieved by the end of the year.
nice slide show or a random rocket
Now show me the proof that it is a scam jet. Where's the video of it hitting anything? Where's the plume that show trajectory?
also
>army
lamo
yes it will, provided that you actually have it and cannot defend against it. China both has it can easily defend against it. The US has neither.
China will never be anything but a regional nuisance that lies about its capabilities. When a bottom isn't fricked enough, she becomes bratty. Right now we are seeing a bratty China, and the world is waiting for an excuse to issue rape correction.
>The Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon (LRHW) is a surface-to-surface hypersonic missile planned for use by the United States Army.
>The weapon consists of a large rocket booster that carries the unpowered Common-Hypersonic Glide Body (C-HGB) in a nose cone
First thing on Wikipedia and you're too dumb to even look it up. Guess China really was faking its IQ figures.
>be us
>try to make actual sustained hypersonic propulsion system
vs
>be russia
>sling an iskander under a mig-31
>call it hypersonic
>technically correct
one of these approaches is orders of magnitude cheaper you know.
It's barely hypersonic in its terminal phase. It's a 1970s SRBM strapped to a Mig-31. Less impressive than the High Virgo, Bold Orion, or Skybolt from the same timeframe.
High Virgo center mounted on the B-58.
These should tell you how old Russia's "hypersonic" Kinzhal really is.
Also, here is Alpha Draco - part of the same WS-199 program as Bold Orion, Skybolt, and High Virgo. Alpha Draco was ground launched, though.
>one of these approaches is orders of magnitude cheaper
And the other will actually penetrate enemy air defenses and consistently hit its target.
so stop failing tests and field the fricking device already.
You are responding to Scramjet articles which is different to ARRW.
>be Russia and China
>make wunderwaffe hypersonic weapons
>gloat about them to the world
>never publish any negative results from testing, only successes
>be US
>make wunderwaffe weapon
>depending on secrecy of program, be pretty open about its progress
>US fAiLs AgAiN!!
We’ll see how well these weapons work when Russia and China’s have a failure rate of 60% and a cep of 2500m
Their weapons are also much slower than what they u.s. is going for.
The russian missile is literally an air launched iskander (LOL)
I bet they are also hypersonic for like a tenth of a second. But frick it , it's their top speed so you can now slap "hypersonic" on the marketing checkbox.
was listening to an assessment by academic level defense study guys on the ukraine war u til now and this is textbook for everything russia does. russia claims to be firing 50k arty shells per day continuously. reality is more like 25k and they are literally firing blindly with conscripted idiots doing the targeting math. russia claims theyve added another 60k more combat soldiers to enter the war soon. they raised the conscription age and forced people in various government employed sectors (forestry, resources, etc workers) to join or else theyd be fired. so basically a bunch of very unwilling people and people 2ho are literally in their late 40s 50s joining as conscripts.
russia is africa tier.
>be Russia and China
>develop and tests missiles
>mutts state controlled media constantly screeching and coping how its a useless concept
>LMAO MEME WEAPON
>be Mc'Bugland
>decide to copy Russia and China
>ITS A WUNDERFAFFE AND MUCH SUPERIOR TO ANYTHING IN RUSSIA AND CHINA HAVE NO WE CANT TELL YOU WHAT RUSSIA AND CHINA HAVE! INCREDIBLE!!!
>cant hide that you keep failing
>THATS BECAUSE WE GOT SO MUCH FREE STATE CONTROLLED PRESS!!! INCREDIBLE!!!
>>be Russia
and tests missiles
Russia's last missile test was quite literally a cartoon shown on state TV. set pieces and CGI, and no proof, no confirmation from satellite or anything or anyone that a launch, any launch, ever took place.
The latest russian missile that i remember was conducted on the ground and it ended with it exploding and irradiating the test area and some of it's engineers.
I was talking about the """""""""""Zircon"""""""""""" missile test. Here's a photo from the Russian MoD. I mean...
I bet they're using Hypersonics as an SDI/Star Wars ploy to make the US waste resources
ITT OP once again pretends shit the US did in the 60s and 70s (maneuverable body on the end of a ballistic missile) is the same as an air breathing scramjet capable of running long distances.
More like 1940s and 1950s.
These "America is falling behind" headlines are just manufacturing consent for more MIC pork.
https://www.army.mil/article/250991/army_delivers_first_hypersonics_ground_equipment
Russia and China are being super dishonest about their "hypersonics". Those are ballistic missiles with regular ballistic reentry vehicles and glide vehicles. The scramjets the US is working on are vastly superior due to these not developing plasma sheathes. In a ballistic weapon the violence of re-entry into heavy atmosphere severely accelerates the formation of plasma making them useless at hitting anything but a static, large target. Scramjets make it so that hypersonic flight is maintained at low altitude through the entire duration of flight, thereby greatly suppressing the formation of plasma (along with a better shape profile). These are real guided missiles that can communicate, use sensors, etc.
Everyone should re-pasta this in the comments of the CNN "article." Mention that the person who wrote the article should get fired for publishing fraudulent false-equivalence as "researched news." The editor who allowed such garbage to make it to publication should also be fired.
uh. low altitude wouldn’t suppress the formation of plasma.
that being said china is probably around 20-30 years behind the us here, russia is roughly on par with the US and USSR in the 70s, which was shockingly even on this front and a handful of others.
>US and USSR in the 70s, which was shockingly even on this front and a handful of others.
Except it's not. A Typhoon is indeed an SSBN that can carry SLBMs. Except it's not really, it's just a pair of submarines tied around a raft of ICBMs of high gayility.
The Buran was just a re-entry glide vehicle in the shape of the Space Shuttle.
The Tsar Bomba is just a lot of Plutonium and Uranium.
You can get the initial capability by leveraging another (usually stolen) technology, but it doesn't actually give you the new technology.
The USSR, though, was far better at reverse-engineering things than China has ever been.
The devil's in the details.
>not developing plasma sheathes.
moron detected
The US doesn't like missiles that don't hit their target
>Unlike programs in China and Russia, U.S. hypersonic weapons are to be conventionally armed.
>As a result, U.S. hypersonic weapons will likely require hitting the target and will be more technically challenging to develop than nuclear-armed Chinese and Russian systems. Indeed, according to one expert, “a nuclear-armed glider would be effective if it were 10 or even 100 times less accurate [than a conventionally-armed glider]” due to nuclear blast effects.
-Hypersonic Weapons: Background and Issues for Congress Updated May 5, 2022
Use nukes. I dare you.
> Implying MARAUDER wasn't quietly continued
Hmmm this exact thread keeps getting posted repeatedly. Hypersonic missiles are a meme to make navylettes feel better and next to worthless when they're like the ones China has.
>anomaly
missile got intercepted by UFO confirmed
They are just gaslighting. The US perfected hypersonics in the 80's.
We've already seen the Russian 35% accuracy rate with their rockets and artillery
While Nato/Murican gets a whopping 95%
Even the Ukies grenade dropping drones has a very high accuracy
How you explain this?
>Russkies/Chinese lie about system capabilities/specifications/costs
>America looks over:
Huh. Alright. If it's a whoopin' you're a wantin'...
>Develops a better program, puts it into mass production, and retires it before one (1) production model rolls off the line at NORINCO or Mikoyan
Many such cases.
>americans admitting they get epically trolled every single time
Lmao dumb fricks, CCP does this so america squanders billions in unfruitful projects with great but unfeasible premises, meanwhile CCP allocates hard working citizen's tax money to public healthcare and maglev train networks. In the end land of the ""free"" ends up with crumpled paper in trash and CCP with working and happy society
Yet in reality America ends up with such a dominant military that our proxy can teabag Russia (a country with a stronger and more proven military than China) using our obsolete leavings, while China is only useful for slave labor and that increasingly is less profitable. Western industry pumped and dumped you like a cheap prostitute lol.
idk man. Aliexpress drones btfo billions of dollars worth of NATO equipment. kek
and ukies are still losing despite china hasn't even done anything lmao
>ukies are still losing
You say this as if everyone in the west thought they would win at the start of the invasion. Russian propaganda is fascinating, it’s wild to see a nation act like the autistic school yard bully by starting a fight and then claiming to be the victim.
None of that is true and your attempt to use online slang to fit in is as threadbare as your potemkin economy.
>How can we bring our military up to par with China and Russia.
Military is downstream of economics. So...
>build a wall
>they have to go back
>end gibs
>end corporate gibs
>end corporate corruption
>build it here/full employment
>fix healthcare
>stop wasteful college spending/worth while degrees only
>stop federal deficit spending and money printing
>stop sending dollars all over the world for everyone but us
>create a generation of americans who believe in america, are competent in STEM, with gov funding to build what we need
Or just keep doing what we're doing so we can collapse under 12-15% inflation and the lowest labor participation rate in our nation's history.
>inb4 some moron quotes the cooked u3 number
>inb4 some boomer says deficit spending is good
I assume you are 12, stopping federal deficit spending alone would be the easiest way to collapse the nation.
And from that statement, I assume you're a stupid god damn boomer.
He's just parroting Russian propaganda, point for point.
Or just keep doing what we are doing and collapse.
History says this will happen. And soon from the looks of things.
I agree. It's almost like there are those that are deliberately trying to fubar the US.
>first full flight test
I guess that means they've solved whatever deployment issues were causing them to fail the earlier tests, good to see the program moving forward
lol nah. They failed the booster again after fluking it last time kek.
>doesn't have working hypersonics
>BUT IT'S BECAUSE WE ARE ""TESTING""" THE SUPERIOR VERSION
>failed
kek. Maybe try doing the basic first.
also nice fanfic. PLA has been able to hitting moving targets 4k miles away since 2020
>Chiner
>working hypersonic
Lol LMAO even.
>PLA has been able to hitting moving targets 4k miles away since 2020
Show me the tests.
I can show you the news and the cope response of the USN ("yea they tested it...") but you will then ask the vid of the missile flying from tibet and hitting the dingy near the Philippines in one take. kek
so I won't show you shit. Keep
>WE WUZZ HYPERNIGGINGGG!!!
Anything besides the CCPs words, or Shekel shuffling for the US DoD?
yes.
meds
Then, take them. You need them, it seems.
The HAWC is the superior version, being an air breathing scramjet powered cruise missile. The CPS is just AHW for 2011, and ARRW is the air launched version. Both being rocket powered boost glide weapons. The HAWC program has been successful in every test flight to date. Where is Chiners scramjet?
here. The scramjet is shot down in a test. That's how far they are ahead.
also
>test
keep testing and
>we wuzzing
one day you will field a single operational hypersonic... uhm... something kek
Quite the evidence, Wei Ye.
like I've said. Keep testing. Maybe in another 50 years you can start testing a hypersonig time machine kek.
>year 2070
>the number of hypersonics in the US military since 1950: 0
> we... we... are working on a hypersonic transexual triple cycle scam engine...
kek
Then, Chiner can copy it and claim victory! Now, where is Chiners scramjet?
there's no victory in testing kek.
it's here
now where is this famous mutt scamjet? I mean the operational one not the "testing" version.
Got anything but a light streak shot with a phone? Why is it labeled IRBM, if it's a scramjet, Wei Ye? Show the actual scramjet. You know you would, if you could. Seeing as you sub-human chinsects love to brag. You've had 20 years to copy the US scramjets, so, why can't you show one?
cannot copy something that doesn't exist. Where is this famous american scamjet that has been tested since 1945 LMAO?
and it's labeled antiirbm because the star of the pic is the anti-hypersonic capacity not the scramjet. Clear?
where's that scam jet again?
>cannot copy something that doesn't exist.
Cope
>Where is this famous american scamjet that has been tested since 1945 LMAO?
Who said 45? Are you stuck in 1965? I said 20 years, smoothbrain.
>and it's labeled antiirbm because the star of the pic is the anti-hypersonic capacity not the scramjet.
What ABMDS isnt capable of taking out hypersonic missiles? What do this prove? Also, where is a scramjet in all this? All MRBM, IRBM, SLBM, and ICBMs are hpersonic, retart.
>where's that scam jet again?
Never heard of X-43A, X-51, HyCAUSE, or HiFiRE? Just look at my post above, I gave the sources. They're why the US has the record for scramje5 powered flight, unlike Chiner.
oh yea and I'll pre-emptive BFTO your "if hypersonics are real, why does the PLAN keep building carriers?"
coz they can defend against it and that the US doesn't have it kek. Imagine developing an already obsolete weapons. But I guess in order to develop a counter you have to acquire the capacity first LMAO
>oh yea and I'll pre-emptive BFTO your "if hypersonics are real, why does the PLAN keep building carriers?"
Becauseall they can do is copy.
>coz they can defend against it
Proof? Show them doing it.
>and that the US doesn't have it kek.
What is AEGIS, GBI, THAAD, and even Patriot PAC-3 taking out a Mach8 Storm II MaRV.
>Imagine developing an already obsolete weapons.
If it's obsolete, why is Chiner so desperate to field them?
>But I guess in order to develop a counter you have to acquire the capacity first LMAO
Yes, hence Chiner not having any nor the ABMDS to even shoot down an ICBM. ROR. RMAO ewen!
Where did you run to, Wei Ye Ping?
Aurora Borealis?
in china?
in the middle of summer?
>PLA has been able to hitting moving targets 4k miles away since 2020
With ballistic missiles.
I am actively working on development of Hypersonics, AMA (that I can answer).
how long has your dad worked at nintendo
For whomst?
I'm an independent consultant contracted on a joint project between two of the bigger A&D firms (you've heard of them). One smells bad.
ah surely if you are working on something and spending a lot of money on it, it will succeed.
Did one just try to buy the other out, and the DoD, shut the deal down?
Will it render aircraft carriers obsolete?
>Will it render aircraft carriers obsolete?
want to see how chinese can nuke US presidents car without leaving their office in Beijing?
Yes. Go ahead and show us, Chang. Let me guess, you can't for reasons?
Why is Mordor bombing Ukraine with 50-year-old rockets?
>implying china and russia have working missiles and didn't put just as much effort into faking it for propaganda purposes
remember the MO of third world countries
they show off flashy elites at every opportunity but in real combat they couldn't even take on one state in the US without getting BTFO and having to resort to nukes or other scorched earth tactics
I heard ghana has power armor... americabros we're falling behind...
USA has field propulsion. The hypersonic missile tech is a ruse meant for the Russians and Chinese to waste their money on obsolete tech.
You know, this does make me wonder, where ARE the russian hypersonic missiles?
I know they've been hyping it up as new wunderwaffe months ago, think they used it on Kiev or somethinga nd then nothing
Was there actually just 4 of them? I thought that was a meme
>country fails at something no one has ever done before
>embarrassing
ok
Russia has shown the world they are not a legitimate threat.
>Russia has shown
kek. Why are you not posting "Putin"? change in the narrative orders of your CIA books?
>anomaly
kek. just in case you israelitelets do not know. China and Russia are leading in the Space Exploration and Civilization right now.
>China and Russia are leading in the Space Exploration and Civilization
Amazing. China has managed to do what the US did in 1998, while Russia provides taxi service for the real astronauts to get to the ISS
Truly, ahead of the pack
Lmao. James Webb is getting close to online. Perseverance and Ingenuity are doing fine. New Horizons can still be contacted and transmitting. Clipper mission is on track. Uranus mission is on the table. JWST is close to me since what it sees is needed in my future research papers.
>ayylmaos will only allow old fashioned kinetic brush ups which disproportionately favor Western powers
Thanks Greybama
Just think. If this man had gotten his way there'd be no wumaos to shit up /k/ once their shift at the rubber dog shit factory ended. Why, there'd be no chinsects at all...
Should have bomb both Russia and China when we had the chance.
More Skybolt on the B-52.
Bold Orion on a B-47.
>US literally had the chance to solve the Russian/Chinese question with total impunity and 100% effectiveness
>Didn't do it
Future generations will blame us.
China and Russia don't have real hypersonics, just propaganda
>what's the point of testing?
next you'll tell me SpaceX rockets explode accidently
The kind of "hypersonic" the US wants is a lot more hypersonic than the chingchong and Russian equivalents.
We don't have to bother.
In ten years the only babies being born in china will be half black, because Chinese women are starting to only sleep with black men now. It's pretty wild. Only a matter of time before their internal racism fractures them.
Russia obviously is in the process of committing suicide by involving itself in some kind of fricking stupid imperialist quagmire so who cares.
>a real, non fake country with functional army and bureocracy finds the hypersonic missile fails. Unlike some made up empty tundra african nation, they go back to the drawing board instead of immediately fielding it and lying about it being functional.
If US has this much trouble developing hypersonics then russia doesn't have any functional ones with its electronics industry literally being stuck in 50s'.
1970
Mach 25
MIRV
GTFO stupid child
>MIRV
Cool 1950s tech. Can you show me Russia's MaRVs? Or the laser gyro that controls guidance? Can Russia or China even make a laser gyro?
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
>How can we bring our military up to par with China and Russia
By not doing anything for the next 500 years
Could Hypersonics be Vatniks and Chink version of the "SDI/Star Wars" program to fool the US into investing huge amount of resources into developing something that would never work?
No, as the US knows about hypersonics, and they're no more expensive than any other program. The US has toyed with them for close to 70 years, and has by far, the most experience with them.
>The US has toyed with them for close to 70 years, and has by far, the most experience with them.
but has zero operational unit.
The US really has the "i'm a sex expert after 70 years of watching porn" energy. kek
low effort bait.
actual cope
Are you going to post that Chinese scranjet video, or no?
Already posted
That's a second or third stage losing control outside of the atmosphere. As seen by the expanding exhaust plume due to the lower pressure of LEO. Now, where is that Chinese scramjet?
sure sanchez.
How does a air breathing scramjet work outside of the atmosphere? It would need an oxidizer and a way to maintain a dynamic pressure of 2000psi entering the combustion chamber. Do you even understand the basic concept of scramjets? Is that why you got fooled bt a failed LEO launch from a rocket? LMAO.
>it's not scramjet because it is outside of the atmosphere
>it is outside of the atmosphere because it's clearly a satellite
that's kinda shoddy sanchez. No more paternal leave for you. Tyrone will take care of your wife instead.
ah the "ICBM are hypersonics" Blacks are back. kek
>deflect and ad hom
You lost the argument. Lmao.
It is clearly outside the atmosphere because of the plume width, transparency, and "glowing" from the sun hitting it - even though the launch is at night. Now, where is that Chinese scramjet? And how does an air breathing scramjet work outside the atmosphere?
>clearly
kek
if you are so sure that it was from outside of the atmosphere. Post a similar incident.
Surely there must be more than once and not filmed in China right?
protip: you can't.
Did you read about those absolutely real incidents just like you read about those absolutely real US scam jet?
dude stop he clapped your ass this is just sad now.
>clap
only if you are a low IQ mongrel. He just used a bunch of meangless buzzwords to impress morons like you.
I've just asked him for evidence and he scurried away like a roach. Typical low paying recruit's behavior.
still waiting for that american scam jet footage and this so called failed LEO launch.
inb4
>the scam jet is real we just made one and launched it so we don't have it anymore
>still waiting for that american scam jet
Here
,
,
,
,
. Already gave you them, you just chose to ignore them, because they make you seethe. Now, I'll settle for just a pic of China's scramjet. Can you show it to me?
Also:
>X-51
https://www.sto.nato.int/publications/STO%20Meeting%20Proceedings/RTO-MP-AVT-145/MP-AVT-145-1.7.pdf
>X-43A
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20080033978/downloads/20080033978.pdf?attachment=true
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20050175679/downloads/20050175679.pdf
yea totally man. That's a perfectly controlled spin compared to pic related which clearly showed a chaotic trajectory.
Also they obviously look totally exactly alike.
Very implressive. I kneel.
surely those satellite launches were actually scam jets because the captions said so. Without those captions and the narrators I could not tell the difference xD
>clearly showed a chaotic trajectory
Yes, all 4 seconds of video showed repeated for two minutes. Show the rest of the video, and not just 4 seconds of the missile porpoising, after losing control.
>surely those satellite launches
X-51 and X-43A are sats, now? Holy cope. Still waiting for that Chinese scramjet pic. Where is it?
>x-51 and x-43a are sats now
yes they are, sanchez. You can even call them your mom or scam jet. Just use appropriate captions kek
and sure man. 4s second, losing control. should have done a spin, that would've been a good trick to show control.
Weird looking sats, Wing Ye. Is this really the cope you're going with? You're going to get yourself gulag'd for such a shit shilling job, "Brian" Ping Wei Bao. Now, I'll ask again" where is the picture of China's scramjet?
>and sure man. 4s second, losing control. should have done a spin, that would've been a good trick to show control.
Why won't they show the full flight, then? Nobody films only 4 seconds of a missile launch.
that looks like a dildo to me. Proof that it's not. Show the fly path like the chinese vid.
Read the paper. Read the technical parts.
the paper is good and all but where is the trajectory? cannot just launch a random dumb rocket and call it a scam jet.
The papers are based on technical data gathered from the flight testing. From there, they try to manipulate the base design which have corrections made by observing the flight data gathered.
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1009/1/012028/pdf
Easy. Literally, the same colors from the light scattering from the sun.
that looks nothing alike you blind moron.
It looks exactly like, except it didn't lose control like the Chinese missile.
damn son, you got thrashed. You need to work on getting my general tso and wonton soup out the door and delivered, cause this whole psyop thing isn't your cup of tea.
Where is the source article from where that video originated came?
>but has zero operational unit.
We have more of them deployed than Russia and China have actual long range nukes put together
You can't
>we dont need hypersonics
>we dont need to invest more in their research
>we dont need to start trials
>we dont need to have our trials run on time
>we dont need successful trials <============ YOU ARE HERE
>we dont need to prove the trials were successful
>we dont need product demos
>we dont need to intercept the hypersonics headed to our mainland
>we dont need to rebuild the cities
>US weapon fails
"weapon failed unfortunately. we will try again."
>russian/chinese weapon fails
"everything perfect, proceed to mass production immediately!"
At least the Americans admit when their stuff buggers up.
steal their shit
why are we pretending this is true?
all throughout the 00s and into the early 10s you could read about US hypersonic missile development
but in the last few years it suddenly became "lol we don't know how to do that"
>all throughout the 00s and into the early 10s
first hypersonic MIRV deployment:
19 fricking 70
now go away
I was born in 1991 so I wasn't really around to hear anything in the 1970s
This is cleeeearly just US maskirova, hiding capabilities etc.
Sweet Jesus, all the reddit cope in this thread
/k/ should be deleted at this point, its redundant while /misc/ exists
Stop seething, Igor Mohammed PingPing.
>this thread
>still up
Armatard is doing his old shit again.
>mutts lose at something
>ARMATARD ARMATARD ARMATARD WHY WON'T YOU LISTEN TO ME
lmao
>t.
>endless threads filled with lies about the ever same shit
>thread magically stays up for days
Dumb moron.
>U.S FAILS hypersonic missile test
That's it. That's the last straw.
I'm disbanding the entire US Military and its contractors effective immediately. Yes, that includes you.
Hahahahahaha
/K/ope Will be massive.
Impressive,
With this most recent achievement, fate has in a single stroke, marked the decline of the west and spelled a new era of wondrous prosperity and peaceful global dominance for the Chinese dragon, which promises to firmly stand in sharp contrast to the historically bloody ascent of western powers and the cruel subjugation it brought to the humbler nations of the world. With the blessings of Chinese hypersonic electricity, quantum hypersonic aircraft carriers and quantum enhanced hypersonic railguns will be the instruments with which China affirms its noble stewardship of 21st century world politics and offers the non-western world a different option; an humanist alternative to the depredations of Western leadership and the opportunity for a more equitable and dignified multilateralism.
And then vatniks pretend to be surprised about everybody hating them.
Why /k/ seethe so hard in every hypersonic thread?
>Why /k/ seethe so hard
Engrish needs work.
It's not the most important weapon system but lacking hyper sonic missiles is gonna give Russia and China strategic advantages in certain theaters.
I'm guessing that the US administration just feels like there are more pressing matters to attend to then hyper sonic missiles.
But what's important is our diversity and meeting minority quotas in industry.
Of course offshoring most of our tech base to Asia was important too.
Anomaly means UAP/UFOs shut it down.