TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG FROM CINCPAC ACTION COM THIRD FLEET INFO COMINCH CTF SEVENTY-SEVEN X WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS S-400 WHERE IS S-400 RR THE WORLD ...

TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG FROM CINCPAC ACTION COM THIRD FLEET INFO COMINCH CTF SEVENTY-SEVEN X WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS S-400 WHERE IS S-400 RR THE WORLD WONDERS

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Holy shit

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Before

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        the three on the right may have got away but the three on the left (or aircraft parked there) look like they definitely got burnt to cinders

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You are obviously not a Russia aeronautical engineer. Everything is fine. It is just some soot from a garbage can that caught on fire. Smooker is being retrained on butt can use.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/kLg2cMS.jpg

      Before

      https://i.imgur.com/Bhh4WSc.jpg

      Whoa mama

      are those actual planes with brown paint or rusted shells?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's the brown camo.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/DXVCGXn.jpg

      TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG FROM CINCPAC ACTION COM THIRD FLEET INFO COMINCH CTF SEVENTY-SEVEN X WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS S-400 WHERE IS S-400 RR THE WORLD WONDERS

      >They claimed 60 pilots were killed
      If this is true then this is a massive blow to Russia

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    can you speak english instead of schizo?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      can you speak historically literate instead of moron
      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_world_wonders

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        new /k/ doesn't own guns or even know military history

        pathetic

        lmfao I actually didn't know this. I'll concede, I am indeed a gay for this one.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          can you speak historically literate instead of moron
          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_world_wonders

          He posted a mobile link so he is still a gay on this one.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            touché

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      new /k/ doesn't own guns or even know military history

      pathetic

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >caring or bothering about some irrelevant piece of trivia that is not about weapons
        frick off

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I won't even dignifying you by calling you a tourist. You don't even qualify as a person.
      >Doesn't recognize a Tennyson reference
      >Nor a taffy 3 reference
      Frankly cease existing and be erased from reality you waste of oxygen, carbon and potassium.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        He admitted he was wrong on the internet though, which is worth more than every cope in the world combined. Give him credit for that much.

        [...]
        lmfao I actually didn't know this. I'll concede, I am indeed a gay for this one.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    what's the actual tally? i can't tell just by looking at charred remains

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I downloaded the singleplayer version of this just to play the quests without the shitty grind lmao.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Black folk tongue my anus

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      We know, Ivan.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    And Ukraine said this was a special forces raid?
    How'd they cause all that mayhem?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Sure looks more like a missile strike than a commando raid to me. Maybe it really was the Hrim meme missile. If it was Neptune, what the frick happened to their air defense?

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >inb4 russia says those planes were old and this was a controlled burn to decomission them

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      There are already comments like that on Lost Armor.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Gentlemen, we must not allow a copium gap!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Where on Lost Armor are they discussing Crimea? I normally get my cope on TopWar.ru

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >I normally get my cope on TopWar.ru
          Thanks anon, this really made my day

          comment section is GOLDEN
          http://topwar.ru/200089-vyjasnilis-podrobnosti-o-vzryvah-v-sakskom-rajone-kryma.html
          >obviously it was an accident, we've all experienced accidents in our service, right comrades?
          >not the first at that airbase, must be a curse
          >could easily have been cigarettes
          >fires are normal on land and at sea, the West covers them up but we don't
          >if it was a saboteur, it's just one anyway, barely a rounding error
          >perhaps it was American hypersonic satellite-launched missiles
          >non-combat losses and accidents in Afghanistan was high due to stress as well

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They are merely only temporarily destroyed, the mighty Russian manufacturing economy could easily replace these in a week.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Nato should directly get involved

    we can chase Russian Black folk back to mongolia

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It is more amusing that vatniks get their asses kicked by the poorest country in europe

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    this is some funny shit, based ukkies, is there any tally yet? looks like 20 fricked up skyjunkers

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Whoa mama

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      that was one expensive cigarette

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        wherever I go, I must also SMOOK

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        For Russia

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That's helluva accurate if done with missiles.
      Is HIMARS capable of that considering the distances involved?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        From the bridge in Kherson we can conclude that HIMARs' rockets' CEP is measured in centimeters.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          As somebody else said, Russians can't even comprehend such a precision. Tbh even I struggle

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Well, Americans can literally land rockets now and that is at least 2 orders of magnitudes more difficult than just hitting stuff precisely with them.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              the missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        M31A1 (what Ukraine has been firing from HIMARS) can't reach this far, not even close. ATACMS can, but the US and Ukraine have both claimed it wasn't ATACMS. My money is on Hrim 2 or Neptune.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          If it was Neptun strike, it would be extremely embarrassing, these missiles are subsonic.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      What are those planes? Holy shit

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I think they are toast.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        SU-24s and SU-30Ms, and because this is Crimea and Naval Aviation they are some of the most modern airframes that Russia has.

        Literally now irreplaceable as well.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      ALL MY FRIENDS ARE DEAD

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I wouldn't trust to fly that plane. Imagine the amount of shrapnel and burning pieces of debris shot around, not to mention the pure pressure wave that shattered every window in a 1 mile radius.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          how strong are military wienerpit windows anyways? are they bulletproof?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Only strong enough to withstand the air pressure around them, otherwise they're usually made to be shattered in case they fail to pop off for ejections.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            No, more like tire iron proof.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          nyet
          plane is fine

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Pilot gets in wienerpit, or pilot gets on frontline

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          that's just the thing. Anything in the vicinity that "looks okay" is most likely mission kill

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          that's just the thing. Anything in the vicinity that "looks okay" is most likely mission kill

          I mean they were also sitting next to burning wrecks for multiple hours which may have effected their own structural stability.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >shattered window in a 1 mile radius
          Source on that or outta your ass?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            https://mobile.twitter.com/christogrozev/status/1557437828455452674
            Is geolocated video good enough?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Holy shit. What the frick did they hit them with? Thats crazy.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                The blown out windows and tossed I-beams are probably from secondary explosions. A 500kg warhead is worth a lot more than 500kg if it lands in the middle of an ammo depot. That's just my conjecture though.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                The big craters are centered on laydown areas of some sort so I think you are correct.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              damn no wonder all those "tourists" left. holy frick

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          If the plane remains on base it's almost certainly not in flyable condition at the moment. They would have evacuated everything they could.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            This is almost certainly correct. All the planes on the flightline that aren't charred wrecks are gone today.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Any “surviving” aircraft would have to have some pretty detailed inspections done to confirm they’re still airworthy, knowing Russia though they’ll probably attempt to push them straight back into service.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      What the actual frick lmao, do someone sees any missile impacts? I can see explosion marks, but they are on whatever left of buildings and on place where a pile of something was. What is really happened here?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Some sort of cluster munitions is my guess. The HRIM-2 supports a cluster warhead from what I can quickly Google.
        If thats the case, any surviving jets might be damaged beyond repair.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        those "buildings" are where russians stored their munitions, probably. it looks like ukrainians aimed specifically for those and let the fireworks do the rest.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      that was one expensive cigarette

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        nice

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      AYYYYYYYYYYYYY

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >yfw you realize Russia can't replace any of this

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Stop smoking!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Jesus frick this is worse than Moskva.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Now, now, let's not make this into a competition.

        ...

        What the frick am I saying, this should 100% be a competition.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        very good reply, I am demoralized.

        I have the satellite pictures open on my 2nd monitor. such a fricking soothing sight. It makes me smile.
        I think it's the largest loss of fighter jets ever, perhaps excluding the arab wars against israel?
        An historic day, the damage is comparable to the moskva sinking money wise I guess? Can someone do the math on the dollar loss on those planes?

        of course, equipment like this is irreplaceable for the russian industry.

        Is this bigger blunder than Moskwa? Planes are fricking expensinve

        A decent warship goes for about 2 billion dollars these days (Burke III), so you'd need to kill another forty or so planes to match the dollar value of Moskva

        Moskva also was one of only five operational capital ships in the Russian Navy, (or four, depending how you count A.Nakhimov). The Russian Army and Navy operate about 1,000 simliar aircraft to these - on paper, that we know of. Could be fewer, could be more.

        With the addition of these, Oryx's count is up to 49 Sukhois confirmed destroyed. That is actually a significant fraction of the 300 or so fixed-wing aircraft Justin Bronk estimated deployed on the Ukrainian front.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >A decent warship goes for about 2 billion dollars these days (Burke III), so you'd need to kill another forty or so planes to match the dollar value of Moskva
          You're making the assumption here that Moskva is worth as much as a Burke. I'm pretty sure that's not true in terms of cost and I'm 1000% sure that's not true in terms of combat ability. Moskva was an overgrown missile boat with minimally effective air defense.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Anon Moskva WAS the air defense. That it got sunk by two missiles made by Ukraine is humiliating. It never should have happened, but it did.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      LMAO some countries have less military planes than russians just lost in one day.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      AHAHAHAHAHAHA VATNIKS TONGUE MY ANUS

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Even the aircraft that look intact seem to have been moved by the explosion. Unless the russians moved them in the time between the sat photos. Difficult to tell what the true losses are just from sat photos. An airframe can be totally fricked even if it doesn't completely disintegrate

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Everything that is still there is 100% fricked beyond repair. Every plane capable of flight was moved away.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Holy frick, this is massive.
      A large portion of the Russian Air Force was destroyed right here.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Is this bigger blunder than Moskwa? Planes are fricking expensinve

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Each Su-30M costs 40 million dollars. Six are confirmed lost so $240 million.

        Each Su-24 is 25 million dollars. 5 are confirmed destroyed so $125 million

        So so far, not counting infrastructure, other aircraft that might be junk, pilots or trained crew, we're looking at 365 million dollars in damage

        Think Moskva was estimated at around double that, 750 million?

        of course, not taking infrastructure, weapons, and fuel at the airport into account, and being very conservative in estimating the amount of planes.
        Comparable, at least.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's a big loss, but the loss of the Moskva was a multi-billion dollar boon for Ukraine because it made Russian operations in the western Black Sea untenable. This enabled Ukraine to "negotiate" an end to the blockade of their ports opening up a crucial source of revenue.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        moskva might be bigger embarassment (barely) and morale booster but this must be bigger hit tactically for sure.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Nah this is an even bigger morale booster because they can't hide it. This happened in full view of a packed beach resort; it's an absolute propaganda nightmare. They might be able to hide how exactly Moskva sank, but they can't hide every tourist in Crimea running for safety on the mainland.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            exactly,this is nothing that the monke gov can hide.these 8 years might soon fade into a memory.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Nah this is an even bigger morale booster because they can't hide it
            you seem to be a bit oblivious on how does russian society function
            or any society in fact
            do you think state TV is going to broadcast pics of these planes? for a common russian what happened was
            >either a diversion or russian incompetence or a missile attack
            and crimea was already attacked once or twice in 5 months so it is really a nothingburger and will be forgotten in like two weeks

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Russia with rockets
      >Shoot 100 rockets per day
      >Hit a building with "CHILDREN" written on it
      >Hit some resort
      >Hit some house and kill a baby
      Ukraine
      >Hit 1 (one) single rocket
      >Tenth of aircraft gone

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/DXVCGXn.jpg

      TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG FROM CINCPAC ACTION COM THIRD FLEET INFO COMINCH CTF SEVENTY-SEVEN X WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS S-400 WHERE IS S-400 RR THE WORLD WONDERS

      ▪8 caмoлeтoв CУ-27;
      ▪4 caмoлeтa CУ-30M;
      ▪5 caмoлeтoв CУ-24 ;
      ▪6 вepтoлeтoв MИ-8;
      ▪1 caмoлeт ИЛ-20RT;
      ▪4 eд. cклaдoв бoeпpипacoв yничтoжeны;
      ▪нecкoлькo здaний пoвpeждeны.

      Whoever will understand it or can translate it gets a cookie

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        ▪ 8 SU-27 aircraft;
        ▪4 SU-30M aircraft;
        ▪5 SU-24 aircraft;
        ▪ 6 MI-8 helicopters;
        ▪1 aircraft IL-20RT;
        ▪4 units ammunition depots destroyed;
        ▪some buildings damaged.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Easily 500 million in damage. Putler gonna be pissed and send more VDV to die in order to make him feel better.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >▪1 aircraft IL-20RT;
          This shit is irreplacable, isn't it?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            well, it's irreplaceable when you consider it's a fricking ancient recon aircraft
            I bet that airframe entered service in the 60's and they just kept putting newer radios on it and increasing the number at the end of it's name by one

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        8 su27 jets
        4 su34m jets
        5su24 jest
        6 mi8 helicopters
        1 il 20rt plane
        4 ammo warehouses destroyed
        several buildings damaged

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        ▪ 8 SU-27 aircraft;
        ▪4 SU-30M aircraft;
        ▪5 SU-24 aircraft;
        ▪ 6 MI-8 helicopters;
        ▪1 aircraft IL-20RT;
        ▪4 units ammunition depots destroyed;
        ▪some buildings damaged.

        (Me)
        What's the source on these damages btw?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Source: It appeared to me in a dream

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          i have no idea, just translated, because someone asked to translate.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Why you cheeky little

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          If an aircraft is pictured it ain't flying

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I remember there was a 737 at Hostomol that was peppered with shrapnel holes.
            If these suffered the same fate, they're out.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Do you mean the AN-225? That actually was irreplaceable, only one was ever built and it was the largest operational plane in the world until the Russians destroyed it at Hostomel.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                No, there was a 737 parked outside, not sure if pic related is it, but it was visible in a number of videos

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Russians destroyed AN-255
                How? It was literally shelled by Ukrainians. Rightfully so because hangar had Russians in it but how the frick do you think Russians destroyed it if there are drone pics of that exact hangar getting shelled?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                by invading ukraine and stationing their military at the plane's site.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >drone pictures of shelling
                Maybe I'm wrong, though I'd say the Russians are responsible either way for invading and standing next to it, but can you link what you're referring to?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous
              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                That's an An-124 you ignorant dipshit.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/u7d8cQW.jpg

          If an aircraft is pictured it ain't flying

          Now the after

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            A MERE FIRE COMRAD, NOTHING TO SEE HERE.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            su-24 in the bottom right looks like its missing wing lul

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >tis but a scratch
      HAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH DUBS OF DESTRUCTION, JUST SOME AMMO AND TRUCKS THEY SAID LOOOL

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Oh no no no nononononono someone has to take a fat L and a fat dump lmao

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      How the frick did they do it

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      So is the runaway unusable now?
      Won't they still be able to launch aircraft from there as soon as they clear the wreckage?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Runways are terrible targets. The airframes and support facilities that got kaboomed are far more valuable.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I mean, runaway is just a large flat area. It is pretty fricking difficult to make completely unusable.

        However what is more important is that Ukraine showed that they can hit the airfield, meaning that storing planes and gear there is pretty dangerous now. Of course the usual russian response has been to ignore the problem, so if ukraine can repeat the strike we will get more kino sooner or later.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Russia actually learned its lesson and moved all surviving planes to another airport 30km North

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Even not accounting for shrapnel I doubt any of those planes have flown off after having high explosives go off right next to them it's probably just a cope.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              While they are probably not airworthy by western standards, some of the ones parked on the other side of where it went off could probably be made flyable within a few hours/days with only a 50/50 chance of crashing on take off.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Bit of filler, new masking tape for the GPS, good as new innit

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        They already abandoned it.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Even if they want to chernobaivka it all the infrastructure is damaged (footage of commieblocks with shattered windows 1.5km away)

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        the airbase is in range of uki weapons.how many burned out jets does it take until they understand what this means?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          More than Russia has.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            kek,its not even a joke anymore.does anyone remember that base with the destroyed helicopters?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        there is nothing they can use the runway for now...

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      BTFO

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Seems like multiple precision strikes ? Multiple buildings / depots obliterated and the planes as collateral damage ?

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Uhhhhh monke sisters…..not another Moscova 🙁

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I count 6 planes total they missed that appear to be untouched. Why target some but not others?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They targeted the munition depots next to those planes.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Either couple of rockets got intercepted or fell short, Ukies did not have enough rockets/time prepaired for all the targets, or Ukraine had some serious insider information and the remaining planes are decoys.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      If you look at photos/videos of Russian airfields the Ru MOD publishes they litterally leave piles of ordanance next to planes to be fitted later. My guess is the dead planes had stuff next to them that touched of tertiary explosions from the secondaries of the central depot/burning fuel. The less fricked ones didnt have these next to them.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    i'm still confused as to what the frick caused the explosions

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >i'm still confused as to what the frick caused the explosions
      This is almost certainly by design
      Some people "in the know" say ATACMS are already in Ukraine
      Some weapon systems nerds say it was some Ukrainian home-produced artillery system that officially never got past prototype phase for lack of funding
      Others yet say SOF
      Officially the Ukrainians say they have nothing to do with it and it was just russian incompetence

      Basically they saturated the discussion with a bunch of different mutually exclusive reasons and now nobody knows what the frick is going on. It's possible that the real reason isn't even in this list.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Actually the Ukrainian position is "you should be more careful next time ;)". It's so sarcastic it can mean anything.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Our local media claimed it had information that it was done by partisans.
        That trash tabloid is not that reliable with its sources though.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Grim 2 seems like he most credible option as whenever we've seen the Ukrainians use a new weapons system they deploy it several times in rapid succession before the Russians can develop a counter strategy, ruling out ATACMS. Sadly this probably means it's not something that can be repeated.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >they saturated the discussion with a bunch of different mutually exclusive reasons and now nobody knows what the frick is going on
        Ukrainians are basically doing exactly what RT did with Moskva, Mh17 and so on

        Kinda based NGL, though I can't wait till 15 years down the line and the tell-all autobiographies come out with the real story

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Absolutely true. Once Russia loses its power in the Black Sea, it will go to TVRKEY. Based Erdogan does it again.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    You need meds sooner rather than later.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_world_wonders

      get educated

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You need an education

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    WHY CANT RUSSIA INTO HANGARS

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Hangars are NATO/ISIS tactics

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Staying outside gives them character

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Hangars take money out of the Yacht budget.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      they gotta be ready y'know

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Wow, congrats ukropigs you got 12 out of 1200. Amazing!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      change ukraine with russia and nothing changes lmao

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      very good reply, I am demoralized.

      I have the satellite pictures open on my 2nd monitor. such a fricking soothing sight. It makes me smile.
      I think it's the largest loss of fighter jets ever, perhaps excluding the arab wars against israel?
      An historic day, the damage is comparable to the moskva sinking money wise I guess? Can someone do the math on the dollar loss on those planes?

      of course, equipment like this is irreplaceable for the russian industry.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >I think it's the largest loss of fighter jets ever, perhaps excluding the arab wars against israel?

        An interesting question indeed.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Each Su-30M costs 40 million dollars. Six are confirmed lost so $240 million.

        Each Su-24 is 25 million dollars. 5 are confirmed destroyed so $125 million

        So so far, not counting infrastructure, other aircraft that might be junk, pilots or trained crew, we're looking at 365 million dollars in damage

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Actual losses are going to be much worse.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      based ISIS-American tactics by the judeo-national-bolsheivek zelensky narco regime

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      words words words

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Wow, that's 12 frontline ready aircraft, their ammunition, fuel, support vehicles, and functioning airfield less that they'd have to support or defend the south sector. This is a Russian win today!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >their ammunition, fuel, support vehicles, and functioning airfield less
        Everyone always loves the planes but forget where the real money and time investment usually is in.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I mean getting more trucks alone will probably be a b***h.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Everyone always loves the planes but forget where the real money and time investment usually is in.
          But anon only some of those oligarchs' yachts got seized, the rest is probably fine.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      There are about 150 Russian planes involved in this war. So this is 10% of active air force gone in one day.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      As opposed to Russia who very definitely destroyed 400 HIMARS out of 12, and bought 10 on the black market as well

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      1% of your whole airforce in a single strike is a fricking terrible loss, not including what % of deployed aircraft for this "not war" it is

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Lose 1% of your entire air force in a few minutes
      >Haha nice try.
      In 2019 Russia made a completeness of 12 fixed wing combat aircraft.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      homie, this has to be quite possibly the worst single avivation loss the Russian Air Force in a single action since what, WW2? Korea? Vietnam?
      And you're not a little big infuriated over this being allowed to happen? You should be at least asking for the heads of whoever was in charge of keeping the S-400s which were apparently in range to defend the air base for doing nothing.
      People have been cashiered for less awful losses than this

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Lol hilarious
      >we don't need flight ready jets
      Thanks for making my day

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      guys after reading this mspaint meme made me realize i kind of like Russia now. picrelated its how i like my Russians

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >5 su30 and 6 su24 destroyed with another 4 possible losses
    >Russian Navy’s 43rd Independent Naval Attack Aviation Regiment only operates 12 Su-30SMs, 6 Su-24Ms, and 6 Su-24MR
    Lmao it's literally over, that aviation regiment got 60% losses just sitting on base

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I can only get so erect

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Which ruskie general is currently responsible for this whole ukraine fiasko? They do have someone leading them, right?
    I want a face I can imagine being screamed at by putin.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      What, the ones that either die biweekly or are being promoted to frontline duty?

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    So I guess the question is what Ukraine's going to hit next and when

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Nothing? The war will drag on for a few more months at least. Although I believe it will last 3 or 4 years in total.

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >vatniks yesterday were trying to gaslight anons into thinking that if there were no planes at the base, then it was a waste of missiles
    >haha not that there weren't any planes there but you do agree it would be a waste right?
    >definitely not concern trolling here
    >lol you're just being paranoid if you think I have an ulterior motive
    >you agree it was probably a waste though right
    Don't think I've forgot your bullshit, you fricking homosexuals. You always do this.

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    so what hit that airfield

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Ukrainian hitlerites and their western israeli handlers will pay for this
    Expect a retaliation of the century within the next 48 hours - bye bye "Kyiv" 🙂

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Oh no oh no oh no is this the same "being bombed every day" threat?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Glove status - about to be taken off?
      Are the eyebrows raising?
      Is the cigarette lit?

      on second thought, be careful with the cigarette. I hear smoking can be dangerous.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Ayo Gcheck?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      retaliation for what? vatnik smoking accident? you gonna rape the poor bastard again?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The dick is entering

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >The HRIM-2 has a range of up to 310 Miles

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        on one hand it's not worth it in any way, tactically. on the other, would be fricking funny reading headlines for a good while.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I could see the Ukes attacking legitimate military targets in the vicinity of Moscow soon™ just to make ole monke sweat

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Nah, if he had to personally hear an explosion he might have a legitimate ape out, or start rolling on the floor in a seizure.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        on one hand it's not worth it in any way, tactically. on the other, would be fricking funny reading headlines for a good while.

        how many army/airbases would be in range from the border with those missiles? how many fuel depots?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      KWAB
      IWANW (I wish a Black person would)

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >hitlerites
      >israeli handlers
      What

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        basically he's saying he has schizophrenia, like all vatniggs

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          This is made even more psychotic by the fact that who made that meme, like vatniks, NEEDS to pin "it" on israelites.
          It is a parody of psychos made by a different brand of psycho

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >SHUT IT DOWN

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >You're pinning it all on the israelites like a psycho
            >Are we allowed to pin anything on the israelites? I mean they do exi-
            >DA JOOOOOS
            >...

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous
        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I just wanna see the fall of the Putin regime just to understand how many shizlo-dissidents they funded.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >SMELL-SMELL! Smell my musk of strength!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yes how DARE THEY attack a completely valid military target with a pinpoint precision attack.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Do you want 15 years in prison Slava?
      Think what you are saying! Mod said it was an accident!

      You don't want to spread fakes about Russian army

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Please don't blow up some more POWs or bomb a shopping mall like the last time you chimped out.

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine the FOD.

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I wonder what this guy is thinking right now

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      could still be achieved without a dozen planes

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        at this point it's more likely for ukraine to take moscow than for russia to take kyiv.

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    imagine being the guy who has to report this to Putin

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        M..mein monke

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      He's probably already dead.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Putin allegedly doesn't have internet or a smartphone.
      It might be that they're keeping a large part of the reality of the war from him, in order to protect their asses.
      Just like the pic you posted, really...

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Wouldn't be surprised if they don't mention anything to him.

      >mein putler.....we have completely conquered Ukraine, congratulations on this great victory with minimal losses
      >oh and by the way Moskva is sailing around in the black sea with its flag raised high in your honor

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      if that one video is any indictation, slapping subordinates like you're in Gundam for the crime giving you bad news that you need to hear about, it might a bit of time before it reaches him.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >that one video
        link?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Fricking wish I saved it now.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Will Smith isn't Russian

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >imagine being the guy who has to report this to Putin

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Ukies are doing what the Russians could not do in the beginning of the war

    crazy

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Love to see it, anons. Gonna have a good nights sleep tonight.

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They've probably lost like atleast a dozen or so pilots here too since the whole base's ammo depot got fricked as a result of this

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Not to mention some of their best technicians too. Pilots are trained with the expectation of some level of attrition and rotation. Mechanics not so much.

  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    https://mobile.twitter.com/JayinKyiv/status/1557353802063298561

    More Crimean bridge attack today

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Chongar
      Crimea even has dedicated resort towns for the obese

  34. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder guys, don't panic!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      For perspective, it's estimated that Russia has 620 Sukhois, all types, in service.
      Oryx counts 49 destroyed, including this Saki strike.

      Besides Sukhois the Russians operate the Mig-29 and Mig-31 family.

      >it's better if we treat it as an own-goal
      It's Moskva all over again...

      >A decent warship goes for about 2 billion dollars these days (Burke III), so you'd need to kill another forty or so planes to match the dollar value of Moskva
      You're making the assumption here that Moskva is worth as much as a Burke. I'm pretty sure that's not true in terms of cost and I'm 1000% sure that's not true in terms of combat ability. Moskva was an overgrown missile boat with minimally effective air defense.

      >I'm pretty sure that's not true in terms of cost and I'm 1000% sure that's not true in terms of combat ability. Moskva was an overgrown missile boat with minimally effective air defense
      Firstly, don't talk about my bae that way; secondly, she was SLAVA, not Moskva. My favourite Soviet ship...
      Ahem.

      Well actually you're correct, however I was thinking in terms of replacement cost because it's the most realistic way to value something that old. It's impossible to value by cost because so much has already been spent on it over the years. With regard to your point about its capabilities, it can be argued that a similar replacement in terms of capability is more like a Type 26 with more VLS cells, which would come up to about US$ 1.5 billion roughly.

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    i cannot even begin to fathom the billions of dollars that have been wasted by the US government preparing for a conflict with Russia over the last few decades.

  36. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    When we we see a list this legendary again? How many more Russian airbases do you think are just as jealous guarded?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      hopefully, in a couple of days

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Badly guarded* fug

  37. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    just visited /chug/, their explanation was that planes were evacuated before and decoys were placed instead. Everything fine Puccia wins again

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I suggest anons save this

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        hmmmmm so ciaBlack folk are saying the truth now?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I see now. Russians truly are 5D chess masters.

  38. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >flagship sunk
    >naval aviation gone
    >carrier destroyed before the war even starter
    >patrol boats fricked
    >landing craft fricked
    >can't get reinforcements because turkroaches blocked the strait

    The absolute state of vatnik naval power

  39. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    there is no government verified confirmation of any of this pictures..americans will believe anything lol

  40. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    it is obvious that the "before" picture was "doctored" to create an "after" picture.. look how the angle of each is exact same.. photoshop away some planes and put black spots and there you have fradulated "after" photo

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      FOAD

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      the shadows are different
      the angle is slightly different
      more things have moved than just the aircraft

      and none of this really matters, convincing a bunch of morons on a basketweaving forum that some planes blew up isn't exactly high on any military/country's list of things to do

  41. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    oinkrainian piggies wasted another 500 trillion dollars hitting styrofoam and balloon decoy planes. That was the last of their ammunition now it's over for them

  42. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    does this mean a naval conquest of Odessa is off the table for now?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >implying it was on the table

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/Qqwo76o.jpg

        >now

        rape

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >now

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It has been since Moskva returned to port with its own strenght

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The naval invasion of Odessa has been dead and buried since the Moscow got sent to Davy Jones' locker. There was no way even with how utterly moronic the Russians are, would seriously think about committing a naval invasion without the Black Sea Fleet's sole capital ship providing support.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Russia will send in 100 warships landing to take Odessa anyday now

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      sadly there will be no Dollar-store D-Day for us in the forseeable future

  43. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Apologize

  44. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  45. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    why do americans impatienntly pile on every plume like it is "out of norm" for a conflict region lol.. every "good news" fake or not and theyre jumping in hysterics
    how hard is it to patiently wait for official confirmation

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >how hard is it to patiently wait for official confirmation
      From who? Russia?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        you think russian mod dont know the "coming and going" of their planes??

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          You know at this point I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't know the coming and going of their planes.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          At this point I'm pretty sure Russian MOD gets its news from actual monkey in zoo.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          you think they do?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I doubt they know the coming and going of their wives at this point lmao

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Officially no aircraft was damaged, comrade.
      There's your confirmation.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >and theyre jumping in hysterics
      yeah, they just finished the parade down mainstreet here after that photo of a blown up plane
      I can't wait for the fireworks tonight

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      We have fresh satellite images of torched Sukhois.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        did you consider the kiev admittance regarding their spreading of lies deliberately???? under the guise of "psychological" warfare.. as if russians stumble at such stupidity.. russian soldiers simply conduct their tasks politely and profesionaly, without the screaming, shouting and swearing so often displayed in american movies that the kiev enforcers have adopted

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >as if russians stumble at such stupidity
          You diverted a shit ton of manpower to Kherson

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          One question mark would've sufficed.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          We
          Have
          Satelite
          Pictures

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            anything can be fake .. and the banderas are known to do it

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Yes I'm sure the Ukrainians hacked the satellite and put photoshopped images to be transmitted. Listen to yourself

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >the banderas are known to do it
              when

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I'd honestly be more impressed if Ukraine was capable of running an disinfo campaign on the magnitude your schizo delusions entail rather than lobbing some missiles at the neanderthals in Crimea.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      very true johnny from homosexual portland oblast here I am patiently waiting for russian MOD official confirmation of this minor fire plume accident occuring and how many nazi missiles were destroyed by decoys

  46. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What are the chances that smoking will be banned in russia soon?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      0%. All those fires are officially "smoking accidents", after all

  47. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Пoявилиcь cпyтникoвыe cнимки aэpoдpoмa Caки y Hoвoфeдopoвки, гдe вчepa пpoгpeмeлa cepия взpывoв. Бeглый aнaлиз фoтo пoзвoляeт cдeлaть нecкoлькo вывoдoв:

    >▪Ha oднoй из cтoянoк видны ocтoвы 4 бoмбapдиpoвщикoв Cy-24M и 4 нoвых мнoгoфyнкциoнaльных иcтpeбитeлeй Cy-30CM. Пo нeкoтopым дaнным, чacть кoнкpeтнo этих Cy-24 пpaктичecки нe лeтaли и гoтoвы были идти в yтиль.

    >Satellite images of the Saki airfield near Novofedorovka, where a series of explosions thundered yesterday, have appeared. A cursory analysis of the photo allows us to draw several conclusions:

    >▪On one of the parking lots, the wrecks of 4 Su-24M bombers and 4 new Su-30SM multifunctional fighters are visible. According to some reports, some of these particular Su-24s practically did not fly and were ready to be scrapped.

    the cope is starting

    • 2 years ago
      ditto

      >some of these particular Su-24s practically did not fly and were ready to be scrapped.
      Oh ffs

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >some of these particular Su-24s practically did not fly and were ready to be scrapped.
      So... standard Russian airforce active-duty airframes?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Could fill a book with all this coping.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Actually laughed IRL

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      is it standard practice to keep aircraft that are ready to be scrapped on an active forward airbase taking up space?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      From fricking Rybar too lel, this ladies and gentlemen is one of the more down to earth Russian news sources.
      Being in Low Earth Orbit is closer than Intel Slave Z out near Jupiter.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >some of these particular Su-24s practically did not fly and were ready to be scrapped
      do they think we don't have google maps and can't see that every plane was on some other spot, meaning it is actively used?
      >big ass hangar looks conveniently pre-ruined and full of holes
      kek

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      If the airplanes in active service are in that condition, how are the planes in storage in siberia?

  48. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    so, will the shit guy deliver? Place your bets.

  49. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Ok, something new.
    On Belarussian channels in Telegram appears information that explosions right now happening in Zyabrovka airfield(Used by Russians)

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Looks like they ran out of ammo dumps to hit and started on airfields.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Nothing is confirmed yet, but if the snacked another airfield then it likely is a combination of newly arrived AGM-88 HARM to take out the air defenses and precious few HRIM-2 ballistic missiles that they have saved for a special moment. Those airfields are probably the highest value target Russia has in this war, worth way more than simple ammo dumps.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Well, Ukraine needs air superiority for a proper offensive. So it is logical to eliminate every potential competitor

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Relax, it is just ammo depot exploding because of lax fire safety standards on base. It is totally not a Ukrainian missile strike!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Smoking kills.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I dont belive you but for the love of god let this be true

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/dTthbR8.png

      Smoking kills.

      >striking belarus
      Hold up now
      I know the russkies have been using belarus to conduct some missions, but I thought hitting belarus was off the table?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >ru*sians can use belarus airfields for invading ukraine
        >ukraine can't touch those airfields because... they just can't, okay?!

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I thought they didn't want to attack belarus to avoid luka being forced to assist in the invasion
          I mean, up until now they never did that, and it's not for a lack of capability

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >to avoid luka being forced to assist in the invasion
            he assisted in the invasion from the start. he deserves the rope as much as monke-man

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >he deserves the rope as much as monke-man
              I agree. I meant assisting beyond just letting russian soldiers do whateverthefrick in belarus or sending some ammo

              Luka is not going to invade it would be the end of him.

              I also believe that, but if that's the case, then why not strike sooner? Why 6 months in and not as soon as the northern front fell? Unless maybe all of the worthwhile targets in Belarus just weren't in range until now.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                is anything confimed yet? seems a bit early to point fingers, belarus has a lot of reasonable people who hate luka, there were many sabotages in the last few months, this could be just another one.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Time will tell. At this point we have no confirmation anything was hit. However timing is often key. Maybe the Ukies have some reason that now is the best time to severely degrade Russian aviation temporarily.

                Fair, I guess it really is a little too early.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Belarusian Gayun (A partisan channel that leaked information about when Russians started their attack) reported about 8 flares https://t.me/Hajun_BY/5206
                Air Forces were flying over Kyiv about 15 minutes ago.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Time will tell. At this point we have no confirmation anything was hit. However timing is often key. Maybe the Ukies have some reason that now is the best time to severely degrade Russian aviation temporarily.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Luka is not going to invade it would be the end of him.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        What do you mean will you deny the humble Russian conscript his god given right to have a cigarette in an ammo dump?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Assuming the story is genuine, I could see that one actually being sabotage rather than the Ukes. I could be wrong, but we've seen plenty of sabotage there during the war.

  50. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Russian tourist crying that her vacation is over

    >I really don't want to leave Crimea. It's so cool here. I'm used to it. It's like we were at home here.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I hope she's on the Kerch bridge when it gets smoked.
      I am a moderate.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      El ogro de las caucosos

  51. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What if this is all set up for a western intervention? Blow up AA, air assets etc all so the US can launch tomahawks into Ukraine from the black sea without any real risk.

  52. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I don't trust any satellite pictures anymore until I see a video with real people in it

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Liket the numerous videos of blast damage on that bridge?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        yes? the difference between the videos and that "satellite pic" was the lack of massive gap on the bridge

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          ok, so you fell for a bad fake on the internetz and now pull a concerned strawmen argument about why all satellite pictures are fake and russian jets did totally not explode? please go frick yourself. tvm.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I wouldn't go as far as "all satellite pictures are fake" but I'm not trusting them until I see the video
            so far I've seen one vid featuring a single destroyed plane

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              nobody cares what you believe or not

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              another well-known vatnig tactic is raising the bar for evidence above what can reasonably be expected

  53. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >hohols actually fell for decoy balloon planes
    L M A O!

  54. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Mein Monke

  55. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Remember that video of the I-beam pushed through a car yesterday? found it! must have been a mighty boom from the place the big crater is to the right of it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      you can actually see the shadow of the beam next to the diagonal car in the middle of the circle

      https://twitter.com/Osinttechnical/status/1557110780180447235

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      ok with all these images I now trust it's real

      what stopped soviets from building caponiers? what stopped ukrainians from building caponiers? what stopped russians from building caponiers? 3 countries controlled that airport within 40 years and none of them bothered to build at least one

  56. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    *breathes in*

    My time has come again.

  57. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >exact hangar
    >shelled
    >by ukraine
    That looks like it could be any hangar hit by anything explosive fired by either side.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      What are these pixels? These RGB values could be anything. Am I writing words on a screen right now? Am I actually a brain in a vat? It's impossible to say.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >a picture of a hangar on fire proves it was a specific hangar shelled by Ukraine because it just does, you know
        OK makes sense

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Cogito, ergo sum
          Sounds like some fricking SHIT to me

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Russians shelled themselves at Hostomel then used Ukrainian twitter accounts to claim Ukraine destroyed their BMDs
      Big if true

      https://i.imgur.com/DXVCGXn.jpg

      TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG FROM CINCPAC ACTION COM THIRD FLEET INFO COMINCH CTF SEVENTY-SEVEN X WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS S-400 WHERE IS S-400 RR THE WORLD WONDERS

      https://i.imgur.com/aV1LTZF.jpg

      Holy shit

      https://i.imgur.com/kLg2cMS.jpg

      Before

      That looks like it could be any airfield hit by anything explosive fired by either side. At any time, too. Yep I think those are UK airports from World War 2.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >a hangar is on fire
        >we can narrow it down to this current war easily
        >the date of the post is two weeks after Ukraine retook the airport
        >nobody in Ukraine has ever been wrong about anything and every social media account with a Ukrainian flag is genuine
        >QED it is the hangar containing the Antonov on fire specifically at the point when Russians controlled the airport, proving Ukrainians did it
        Makes even more sense now

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          see filename

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            This appears to be evidence that the hangar with the Antonov was on fire at one point. I don't dispute that, my first post was saying it was destroyed. I always agreed it was destroyed. I'm talking about your claim the Ukrainians destroyed it and I have no idea how this image is supposed to prove that.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          see filename x2

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >27th feb
            OK now that actually does make sense. Though obviously it is still Russia's fault for invading unprovoked and putting stuff near it, but looks like it must have been Ukraine that actually hit it.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              should have claimed all vdv were killed and ukraine retook the airport and russia got very angry and destroyed the plane as revenge and ukraine used a drone to survey the area and post pictures of hangar for BBC and CNN

              you still have much to learn from the best shills of ukraina...

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >all vdv were killed and ukraine retook the airport

                No of course not that would be ridiculous.

                Ukraine took the airport, THEN the VDV were all killed as they retreated through the town of Hostomel, not the airport.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >THEN the VDV were all killed as they retreated through the town of Hostomel
                and THEN everyone clapped

  58. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Bull Halsey was a fricking dipshit moron. So was Ernest King, and so was General McArthur. All dumbshit manchildren addicted to the smell of their own farts.

    It's a goddamn miracle that we won the Pacific theater with them in charge.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *