Tomahawk missiles for Ukraine?

Tomahawk missiles for Ukraine?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just give'em nukes already.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That would just give Russia excuse to use theirs. It's funnier when they keep screeching Nooks Nooks while being disassembled with basic tactical weapons from 70s that were almost scrapped due to age. And we get to see how good various cold-war era systems compared against each other.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        As it turns out the soviets lied about a lot of shit.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I mean, Russia breached the Budapest Memorandum in the most egregious way possible so it's only fair that Ukraine gets back its nukes.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i cry every day

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine these things hitting refineries

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why would you expend top shelf military bling when you can 9/11 whatever strategic target for the cost of an old light-sport aircraft?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >light-sport aircraft
          because they don't fricking do anything at fricking all.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            he's talking about the ones filled with explosives that are fricking up Russian refineries (probably as we speak)

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The new ones are better since they can fire any VLS missile, those old things could only fire tomahawks

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The new trailer is too big

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          why do you care how big it is?

          Does that impact how it performs?

          If anything the trade-off in increased size for a wider selection of missiles seems like a solid deal.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The big ones hurt anyway.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      So China is currently the only country who already has long rangecruise missiles launched from TELs? Why hasn't Russia nor the US have adopted something similar? Even the Russian TEL launched cruise missiles are gimped in range, and the US only now is starting to field the Typhoon.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >GLCM was removed from Europe beginning in 1988, and over the next three and a half years all units were transported to Davis Monthan AFB and destroyed or converted into displays by 1991. Eight missiles survive for inert static display only.
        then later russia broke the treaty by developing and deploying the Iskander-K GLCM

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          But the Iskander-K has gimped range, only 400km or so, whilst the chinks launch the same CJ-10 used by their Navy (Kaliber clone) directly from their TEL which is why they're much longer and bulkier. Of the Iskander-K were the full fat Kaliber, then Russia would have been able to launch Its deep strikes into Ukraine with muchpre success since up until now Ukraine gets hours of forewarning due to Russian bombers taking off and being tracked or their ships from the Black Sea.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            They CLAIMED they had gimped range. The Iskander-K was designed to fire ground launched versions of the Kalibr and Kh-101 that can go way beyond 500km, so nobody was buying that BS.

            It would be like the US trying to push Typhon while still under the treaty, slapping Tomahawks into it, and then saying "They only go 500km, trust me!"

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >But the Iskander-K has gimped range, only 400km or so
            They just lied about the range

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Because before, the US and Russia were both gimped by the INF Treaty that prevented them from deploying ground launched, long range cruise missiles, with the fear that such missiles could be used to carry nuclear warheads.

        However, given both China and Russia's increasing investment in the capability, the US saw that the INF treaty was effectively dead and scrapped it so they could develop their own capability.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The US and Russia were prohibited from having MRBMs, IRBMs, and ground-launched cruise missiles until 2019.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >want russia to sign INF
      >put tomahawks on trucks
      >russian signs inf
      >get rid of tomahawks on trucks
      >russia breaks inf
      >put tomahawks back on trucks

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That is the life and death of treaties

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    noooo that is escalation

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not gonna happen sadly.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If Biden gets to the point where he's allowing ATACMS attacks on Russian territory this will be the next rung up the escalation ladder. Perhaps Ukraine will be given a token few to attack Crimea to make the threat real and imminent.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They'd never allow Ukrainians to pick their own targets with them.
    They could hit Moscow and St. Petersburg. Imagine one of these hitting the Kremlin.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Hell, launch them at every administrative center west of the Urals.
      If they so constantly paint themselves as opposed to Europe, they have no right to remain within its borders.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Guess that would be nuke material. I mean, Putin invaded for way way less than that. I'm not even ioking: soviet/russian nukes are there in case of an existential threat to the motherland, so any serious military effort against the capital would probably trigger some sort of nuclear option, especially because it's not like Russian can do anything else to escalate further. Unless their doctrine explicitly states that they're to be used only against nuclear-capable enemies, but I don't really remember if there's this clause.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        A scenario would be Ukraine hits Moscow with something like this, Russia launches a tactical strike at Kiev, Russia then proceeds to lose all air and strategic strike assets as Desert Storm this time with China edition happens.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >They could hit Moscow and St. Petersburg. Imagine one of these hitting the Kremlin.
      Ehm... based?

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Unironically nook nook if that happens

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Tomahawk missiles for Ukraine?

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    give them SSGNs

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    5x the range of stormshadow and new blocks are less likely to be intercepted

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    what's the name of the system? I'll write my representatives.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Technically theyre still in development because we scraped ours due to a treaty with Russia, but Russia is perfidious so here we are.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        alright, I'll see what I can do.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He will die for the motherland to try and stop it.

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I like the Marine's new Tomahawk launcher.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Me too but that is the NSM launcher.

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Hear me out... We put 300 of those on a container ship without telling anybody.

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Give them some MOABs. Yeah they won't be effective but frick if it doesn't make me hard.

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    what is up with this picture? it looks like it was drawn over or rotoscoped

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      AI resized

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    When are we going to integrate that piece of shit with AEGIS so we can get mobile SM3/SM-6? SM-3 flying at hypersonic speeds blasting chink planes/satellites out of the sky with targeting data from a TPY-2 when?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      SM-6 is slated for future capability.

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    IN THE MODERN WORLD

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *