No, he's just mad, he can't just falsely accuse you alone to be Armatard, he's throwing his own post into the mix so it isn't too obvious. This is like the third thread today he's doing it in.
>did anglos frick your dad and mom?
He's just an potato headed autist. Has no friends, even his family don't like him.
This is the only attention he gets from the world, so go easy on him.
He's like the special needs kid, best just to ignore him.
it wasn't perfect at the time and it's extremely outdated nowadays, but it did its job. Like a lot of British cold war designs it was a compromise between what the Army wanted and what was available with MOD frickery, hence the RARDEN gun which is its biggest flaw. The hull and engine were completely fine.
Ultimately, the primary weapon of an IFV is the infantry it carries, and over 30 years of service it carried British infanteers into contact to stab frickers. That's what an IFV is for. Everything else is gravy.
kind of, you can load 4 of them so you get 12 rounds of continuous firing but it's still shit compared to a proper autocannon and obviously it's not stabilised. The ballistic performance of the rounds is very good though.
There were various proposed upgrades to Warrior over its life, most of which involved replacing the RARDEN, but for some reason none became reality.
The Warrior would have been an acceptable IFV if it had at the very least a stabilizer. I literally don't know what the frick the British MOD was thinking designing a vehicle without a stabilizer in that era. And if it didn't have a stabilizer, it should at least have had a much faster firing main gun that could hold more than 12 rounds at a time that had to be loaded in fricking clips.
The ones who do are fricking obsessed though. I had to work with one, in the UK, he was a total moron who wouldn't shut up about the British armies gear being bad. (the rest of you are all sound though)
Some of us are just born mad and stay mad, unfortunately. Sorry you had to deal with one.
Ironically I think I know more people who love Bong stuff than hate. Mostly for WWII stuff and especially the planes, but also one guy who was obsessed with the Royal Marines, another loves the SAS.
You can't deflect Armatard onto me when you're the one that's Armatard and spamming thread about bongs and asiatics homosexual.
Kill
Your
Self
And stop shitting up the board.
He is deffo American time, Mexican maybe or a USA Mexican state, starts at 7am, ends his shitposting late afternoon.
[...]
He even says he does it at work in this thread, I assume at home too. And he's been doing it for over a year now.
Spams threads when people call him out on his shilling like today, he's desperate for something, attention maybe. Kind of pathetic if you ask me.
what? also are you the same anon that posts the starstreak thread? did anglos frick your dad and mom?
Hello Armatard - playing the pretending to be someone else shtick again are we?
you okay you tagged me twice thinking im armatard? are you drunk?
Hello Armatard
hello it is i armatard, i will make a post next with the stock photo of the su57 flying
No, he's just mad, he can't just falsely accuse you alone to be Armatard, he's throwing his own post into the mix so it isn't too obvious. This is like the third thread today he's doing it in.
>did anglos frick your dad and mom?
He's just an potato headed autist. Has no friends, even his family don't like him.
This is the only attention he gets from the world, so go easy on him.
He's like the special needs kid, best just to ignore him.
Lmaoo that vatink poster really mindbroke you. Now every post you dislike is armatard. MEDS NOW
Still shits all over BMPs
it wasn't perfect at the time and it's extremely outdated nowadays, but it did its job. Like a lot of British cold war designs it was a compromise between what the Army wanted and what was available with MOD frickery, hence the RARDEN gun which is its biggest flaw. The hull and engine were completely fine.
Ultimately, the primary weapon of an IFV is the infantry it carries, and over 30 years of service it carried British infanteers into contact to stab frickers. That's what an IFV is for. Everything else is gravy.
Is the three round clip as awful as it sounds?
kind of, you can load 4 of them so you get 12 rounds of continuous firing but it's still shit compared to a proper autocannon and obviously it's not stabilised. The ballistic performance of the rounds is very good though.
There were various proposed upgrades to Warrior over its life, most of which involved replacing the RARDEN, but for some reason none became reality.
Hello armatard
The Warrior would have been an acceptable IFV if it had at the very least a stabilizer. I literally don't know what the frick the British MOD was thinking designing a vehicle without a stabilizer in that era. And if it didn't have a stabilizer, it should at least have had a much faster firing main gun that could hold more than 12 rounds at a time that had to be loaded in fricking clips.
FRICKING. CLIPS.
Why does bong military equipment live rent free in your head and are you an argie or a pajeet?
Maybe Irish?
Irishman here, we don't really have any strong opinions on bong gear.
The ones who do are fricking obsessed though. I had to work with one, in the UK, he was a total moron who wouldn't shut up about the British armies gear being bad. (the rest of you are all sound though)
Some of us are just born mad and stay mad, unfortunately. Sorry you had to deal with one.
Ironically I think I know more people who love Bong stuff than hate. Mostly for WWII stuff and especially the planes, but also one guy who was obsessed with the Royal Marines, another loves the SAS.
Is this why you spam threads OP
Did the bongs and the Koreans rape you Warriortard?
Hello Armatard - go eat dogshit.
You can't deflect Armatard onto me when you're the one that's Armatard and spamming thread about bongs and asiatics homosexual.
Kill
Your
Self
And stop shitting up the board.
Jesus you even type like Armatard
He is deffo American time, Mexican maybe or a USA Mexican state, starts at 7am, ends his shitposting late afternoon.
He even says he does it at work in this thread, I assume at home too. And he's been doing it for over a year now.
Spams threads when people call him out on his shilling like today, he's desperate for something, attention maybe. Kind of pathetic if you ask me.
There are several Korea shills, but I'm not sure if warriortard is among them except to ironically troll maybe.
This is you 5th thread on the catalog warrior/armatard.
Cope
how many times are these threads posted? it's so boring.
>shed roof as side armour
bing bong it's bong o'clock.