this technology be small enough to fit in a pistol sight by the end of the decade

Why would you waste your money on a reddot now?

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Thermals on a pistol

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      to get the hollow man, obviously.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Shit I hadn't thought of that.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How does that sight even work?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Thermal sensor on top that overlays thermal signature onto the optic itself.

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You do realize most of us have money to buy fun stuff now and also later? That’s part of being an adult and having disposable income, zoomer anon. I’m not gonna cry that the $4k thermal clip on i bought is gonna be out dated in a few years by alot, i’m only going to think about the cool memories i made riding around the desert looking for some wendussy

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Thermal
      >Wendussy
      >He doesn't know

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    its cool tech and looks good indoors but at range it would be useful i doubt it will actually work well enough to be worth it

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Sensor resolution on it should allow for several hundred meters of detection range.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Has a 320x tops for a pistol optic, you’ll never know what anything really is past 150 yards. The lens and resolusion criples it hard

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's not a pistol optic, it's larger than a Sig 8T. The sensor resolution for the 1800 dollar one is 256 and the 2200 dollar one is 384. The objective lens size on the latter is fairly large.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Eh. Not really needed (by me) now or in the future.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Does that mean the Steiner CQT is obsolescent for $9k?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What could their overhead be if holosun can do it for a 10th of the price?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Either that or their margins are stupidly fat. Like OI margin of 30%+

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Costs $5400 everywhere now, and no absolutely not

      What could their overhead be if holosun can do it for a 10th of the price?

      Chink steal, no r&d costs for chinamen

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >r&d costs
        Thermal overlay has been a thing since land warrior at least. It's just an extension of CG overlay. Which was a thing in the 70s.
        This is a revolution in application. Not tech.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Costs $5400 everywhere now, and no absolutely not
        Where?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >https://palmettostatearmory.com/steiner-cqt-close-quarter-thermal-optic-300352-1.html
          $4400 from PSA, next time atleast try anon

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Steiner CQT is obsolescent for $9k
      They stopped making that now and have been clearanced out at several retailers that still have stock of them, I've seen it for under $4k before.

      https://i.imgur.com/MxpaJkT.jpg

      >Costs $5400 everywhere now, and no absolutely not
      Where?

      >amazon
      lmao why the fuck are you using amazon.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >They stopped making that now
        Why?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Can't say for sure, Steiner (and Burris as they own Steiner) got into thermals pretty late compared to other thermal brands it was not very price competitive to those other brands with same tech specs.
          Last I heard about Steiner's thermal optics they are releasing a new series that fixed a lot of complaints they had i.e. too low battery life, too heavy and bulky and probably priced according to the market.
          This one model the CQT did not really sell well at the MSRP and honestly the thermal market does not have a "need" for it as the CQT is aimed more for doorkickers than hunters (who are the majority of thermal owners in the US imo). The detection range is not suitable for long range, it is monochrome that is hard to determine what is the target thermal signature is. And the price was just too high for the civilian market imo.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    most people arent put out by a couple 100 bucks

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >thermal optic
    >on a gun for use at 25 yards or less
    >where most use is at 10 yards or less

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don't know, so you can clear a room without someone shooting at your flashlight?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >slowly scanning a room with your extremely narrow FOV thermal pistol red dot to clear it
        >when anyone intent on shooting you could be returning fire relying on anything from light outside the room backlighting you to the noise of you entering the room

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      While I'm not saying it's a must have utility, but being able to just put your crosshair on the green thing instead of actually having to pick them out of a background manually is one less thing your brain has to think about.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Thermals will be on IVAS type of ARGs.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *