This feels safer than the T90. At least there is no automatic loading device that makes the crew barbecue.

This feels safer than the T90.

At least there is no automatic loading device that makes the crew barbecue.

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >AZNs can build better than Russians
    Who knew?

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I love Norktard but we've all heard about they quality of their shells.
    How can you trust that their military isn't a paper tiger?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Arguably better gun if they can make modern sabots for it.

      He is talking about the actual tank not the overall military.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >He is talking about the actual tank
        Remember the Armata? It looked nice too.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The type 215 has over twenty times the reliability of new Russian designs, this is scientific fact proven by two dozen of them simultaneously completing a parade without catching fire.

          >i can go over all the unique Nork features of the kit.
          PLEASE

          He can't, if he could prove it the seller would be in jail. Any alleged Nork features probably came from mismatched Ethiopian AKs (and/or Sudan) which are made on Korean machinery. Note the kits say each is unique; they are bit from half a dozen guns from different nations randomly thrown together.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Malicious lies. Our great leader has forged for us the hardest cardboard in the world, much to the envy of you western dogs.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        *cardboard-like material. It's actually made from waste from the cracker industry mixed with coal dust to create a sort of fibrous board

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I've often wondered how the original T-62 design team would react if they could examine one of those.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Crew will always be barbecued if you hit the unprotected ammunition.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is that 115mm? or 125mm?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      125mm, no autoloader. In theory it should be able to use one piece ammo.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Every part in my Nork AK kit feels like it's made from literal garbage. The front trunnion is so out of spec i can headspace it with raw strength. I doubt there tanks are much better.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Surely this highly dubious anonymous claim trumps decades of examination of North Korean small arms by every major western military on earth as well as real world combat experience, post AK.

      >Nork AK
      Did you buy it from the same place you got your 100% real Luger personally used by Erwin Rommel?

      >At least there is no automatic loading device that makes the crew barbecue.
      moron, that moronic Black person rigged ammo rack will cook the crew.
      And I dare to say that it's worse than the carousel because the carousel at least is in a better place.

      Show us your engineering degree and photos of the captured tank you examined.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        > tank you examined.
        Physics and photogrammetry 101 moron.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Ah, the weird ESL Russian shills that pop up in any DPRK thread are out. Everything that isn't Russian is fake, even the stuff from nations you are dependent on right?

          >In before responses with 100% more racism and zero sources besides your ass

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            keep the gas for yourself, i don't have light-er

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Vatniks out

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Atlantic imported a few thousand unmarked Nork kits from the middle east a year or two ago. Link related.
        https://atlanticfirearms.com/search/?q=ASIAN+CONTRACT&qt=all_words
        If that isn't enough proof l, i can go over all the unique Nork features of the kit.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >are devoid of any arsenal markings.
          >No two rifles will be the same
          >Due to the unique design they will require a proprietary receiver or you can modify an existing AKM pattern receiver .

          So you don't have a Nork AK, you got ripped off on a pile of random parts of which if a single one could be proven came from North Korea would put Atlantic Firearms out of business and possibly put the management in jail?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >i can go over all the unique Nork features of the kit.
            PLEASE

            For reference
            https://www.conflictarm.com/guide/identifying-materiel-manufactured-in-the-democratic-peoples-republic-of-korea-dprk/

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              As already mentioned those 'distinctive features' can be on several other makes and Atlantic very clearly states these are franken kits made from multiple guns of different design. Even if there were a few 50+ yo Nork parts it means nothing if they are jammed in with half a dozen other models. They explicitly state that each gun is a mismatch of mystery parts.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Polish gas tube left, Korean right. Note the Prominent seam unique to nork rifles. nork Hand guards also have a unique hump, but the one on my kit is non-original, likely Russian or polish. One of two parts I know For sure are replacements (The bolt is non-matching).

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Unique flattened nork flat gas block Top, polish AKM block as reference.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Nork Lightning cut FSB right, polish AKM left

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Holy crap are those beat up. It looks like all marks were taken off with a angle grinder.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Nork Ridged trigger Trigger guard, right. Polish trigger guard on the left. The nork one is about half a millimeter thinner. Would post a comparison, but my Calipers battery is dead

                [...]

                >zero image results
                Go on. Out of curiosity have you tried to count how many different nations/models the kit was made from?

                The only non- matching parts on the kit are the upper Handguard and bolt.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Frick

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/dIjfi1e.jpeg

                Frick

                Nork export rear sight leaf,

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Nork two piece rear trunnion, Similar to stamped type 56, but in a 1mm receiver

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Frick, again I hate phone posting

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Fair enough. I still don't see how a brutalized old parts kit is any real judge of anything, it is no different than saying 'my beat up 50 yo M16a1 parts kit is crap therefore a new M4 must be crap'

                You seem an intelligent and rational person, surely you must see my point. Thanks for the pics and sorry for any snark btw.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I used to do NGO work in Africa and the Middle East. Got too mess around with quite a few clapped out AK, even when beat to shit you can still tell that someone put effort into it. With the nork kit, you can tell it was just slapped together, tons of parts were hand fitting together, the gas tube lever wasn’t heat treated correctly, the front trunnion is .15mm out of spec (I can shove a standard AK barrel with my hands. The problem is most of these thing are hard too portray though text and images alone.

                How does milled compare to stamped?

                >Post 'show AK'
                >Posts AK
                >Makes me look like a ass

                The stock is milled from bar stock, instead of stamped. Top nork, bottom yugo stamped stock

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous
              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Norks also have a unique FCG, but I've misplaced the one in my kit. That's most of the unique parts.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So why have i seen several interviews with guys from the horn of africa praising them to high heaven? They seemed to have much newer ones, like they just came out of the factory. Could the difference be explained by the obvious time gap in production dates? What they had and your kit are probably 40-50 years apart.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It could also be that whoever bought them put more of an emphasis on quality in there contract. The chinks did something similar with there AKs, the ones sold to the US had better QC than one sold to other markets. I've never seen these interviews, would you mind linking some?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Unfortunately Vice no longer exists, especially the older stuff. They toured the Mogadishu arms markets and did a bunch of interviews as well as price comparisons. New Nork AKs were selling for as much as good quality Russian ones, Paki and Indian ones were absolute garbage tier. The documentary part is probably somewhere on youtube but the extended written part i can't find anywhere.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The Norks could of also upgraded there tooling. Small arm are one of the few non-material they export, wouldn't be surprised if there were significant investments since the 60s.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The time line suggests they did exactly that when they switched to 5.45, Ethiopia probably got the older tooling. Their early AKs predate their current technology stealing skills or at least are before it truly accelerated to the modern level. Also anonymous unmarked guns for export undoubtedly were the oldest and worst available.

                As in regards to OP, every war that their vehicles were used in they worked. Those who still have them still use them and every one examined by the west was OK, the objection to the Koksans we looked at wasn't build quality it was barrel wear and mildly alarming powder charges. The tank would probably do as well as most Russian tanks.

                Personally i'd choose the Type 215 dakka mobile. These World of Tanks punks will be in for a big surprise when the drone only depletes my C&C health bar 10%, if i last long enough they will shit in terror when that third stripe and spinning wrench pop up over my head.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Isn't even really a MBT, in Ukraine i'd use it as a mobile support asset. No way i'd waste pop up ATGMs, AA missiles and twin indirect fire AGLs on assaults. A unit of those is a mobile second line supporting fire base, the gun should only be used if it's countering a breakthrough or in a ambush which it would likely be annoyingly good at in urban or rolling terrain.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/RCEGC8g.jpeg

                Frick, again I hate phone posting

                Early milled nork underfolding stock, Both milled and stamped stock have been found in kits. (Note, neither Sudan or Ethiopia have been recorded making under folders) Same with with dust covers, my kit has an AKM cover, though it’s slightly thinner than soviet spec.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                How does milled compare to stamped?

                >Post 'show AK'
                >Posts AK
                >Makes me look like a ass

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/8DVRtFq.jpeg

                [...]
                Nork export rear sight leaf,

                By non matching i assume you mean make of gun not serial numbers.

                You do seem to have what are probably a bunch of really beat up nork parts, the rear sigh cinches it. I don't really get the point though. You would get the same result from a bucket of random captured M16a1 parts bought from Vietnam after they picked out the good ones.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                6 out of the 7 serial marked parts are matching. As for why, how else am I supposed to get a Nork AK?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Christ, who ever handled that lathe should have both his arms cut off

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/cNZoE3e.jpeg

                Unique flattened nork flat gas block Top, polish AKM block as reference.

                >zero image results
                Go on. Out of curiosity have you tried to count how many different nations/models the kit was made from?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >i can go over all the unique Nork features of the kit.
          PLEASE

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You can buy them from Atlantic, they are unobtainable. Hoo boy did they look shitty.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Um, bro guy just did a take down of one like 5 posts ago.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >At least there is no automatic loading device that makes the crew barbecue.
    moron, that moronic Black person rigged ammo rack will cook the crew.
    And I dare to say that it's worse than the carousel because the carousel at least is in a better place.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if the ammo compartment is not isolated, then it aint much different tbh

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why does the tank look like it's made of cardboard?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because you have repeatedly said that three times despite it obviously not being true.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No one but the people inside the vehicle cares about crew survivability.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The Norks constantly reinventing the T-62 is one of my favorite things in the world of armor

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >This feels safer than the T90.

      >Slightly more survivability
      >Same gun but theoretically better
      >105th KPLA armored division
      >Elite unit who are only chosen after volunteering for a second term after a minimum eight year commitment
      >Officers who by default rose from being NCOs to LTs over a decade, 32-40 yo LTs

      Compared to Russian tank crews i'd take Norks any day, at least Norks are actually trained and will follow orders.

      T-62 was the best tank the USSR ever made and if the USSR had standardized incremental development of it like Israel (centurion) and the DPRK (T-62) Russia would much better off military speaking in the modern era.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        kys norkshill

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Do you really think there is a conspiracy of North Korean agents following your posts?

          There is and we are watching you jerk off.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            how do you rate the new regiment? i think the tub of butter is a bit much sometimes but it really adds something.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I rate any North Korean unit better than any comparable Russian unit. North Koreans have many legitimate reasons to hate humanity as a logical reaction to how they have been treated historically, Russians are just buttholes compared to them.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If only corruption wasn't rampant in Yelstin era Russia we'd have a bustle loader T-90. Regardless the carousell loader in a T-64, 72, 80, 90 etc is pretty hard to hit if its a tank v tank battle. The biggest issue is having only 1 reverse gear

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No Soviet Era design besides the T-62 is worth developing. The T-62 was designed with a over sized turret ring meant to be upgraded with a bigger gun, space for a bigger engine ect.

      The DPRK made the right choice in deciding to base all their tanks on the T-62.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >If only corruption wasn't rampant in Yelstin era
      Bruh, corruption wasn't the issue at all, compared to literally not having money. Back during the 90s crap collapsed and oil was cheap, russian literally didn't have money, they had to take out foreign loans to finance their crap. New tanks were out of the question, if not financed by a foreign customer.

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    north korean gear is junk

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *