The purpose of this post is to remind you that OP is one obsessed man from Florida that is obsessed with the warrior. He also cannot afford a decent tool bag or stool.
What kind of sickness does this poster suffer from? That isn’t my wallet
kek yes.
BMP-1 looks great on paper but total crap in real use.
Largest paper tiger AFV in the history.
Its hilarious when this piece of shot provoked knee jerk reaction from the West.
Israels who faced them first in the war and captured hundreds of them found them absolutely useless and wrote them all off. When at the same time they put other captured red AFVs to the great use (T-55, T-62).
The purpose of this post is to remind you that OP is one obsessed man from Florida that is obsessed with the warrior. He also cannot afford a decent tool bag or stool.
What sort of cope is this? I see this picture posted fairly regularly by Russian defense Twitter accounts. What’s the meaning of the image and why do vatsisters keep posting it
Lol its over bro, you use the same responses everytime. I feel bad that you have to use a wallet from Amazon lol do you want to share with the group your stool and tool bag while bragging about your tube job?
That would be the HS-30. The only thing wrong with the warrior is the choice of armament, which could be fixed by the bongs relatively quickly by just dropping in a Bradley turret. Kuwait did something similar.
You are the one on meds since you made warrior threads literally every day for months on end.
It's a real coincidence really is all I'm saying that all the moronic shitposting just happened to start the same time your warrior threads started.
>appears when a few "other spammers" get unbanned
Who are you referencing? Did you think people would just take your word at face value?
Lol its over bro, you use the same responses everytime. I feel bad that you have to use a wallet from amazon lol do you want to share with the group your stool and tool bag while bragging about your tube job?
I’m sorry but this is the first time I made a thread discussing the warriors flaws. It’s not like it’s flaws aren’t well known so I guess it makes sense that people have pointed them out here in the past.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You are a humungous lying homosexual hat says this every thread and you should have a nice day already
2 years ago
Anonymous
When I tell you to take your meds I’m not doing it to be funny, I genuinely hope you take them to get better. Your unhealthy obsession with some dude who may or may not have said similar things to what I’m saying is glaring. Do you think all f-35 threads are started by the same guy as wel?
>the gun isn’t stabilized
I’m gunna need a sauce on that. I find it hard to believe the brits would slap a non stabilized gun onto their ifv when everyone else at the time was using stabilized guns. I’m not saying you’re wrong but it just seems like cap
>Compared to contemporary American and Soviet IFVs, the Warrior’s turret lacked any kind of FCS or stabilization >The base model is the FV510 Warrior Section Vehicle armed with a non-stabilized 30 mm Rarden cannon and coaxial 7.62 mm machine gun in a two-man turret.
Afaik only desert warrior and that new with 30mm cannon has stabilisation but after all you are talking about nation that still has rifled cannon in mbt
>*scoffs* nation that still has rifled cannon in mbt
And now in the real world >A Challenger with the callsign 11B fired at an Iraqi main battle tank from a distance of more than 5,100 meters – just above three miles – with an armor-piercing fin-stabilized discarding-sabot round, the longest tank-on-tank kill ever. >EVER
yea, because others were just using ATGMs to make their life easier.
10 May 2021 >Rheinmetall modernizing the UK’s main battle tank Challenger 2 fleet
Order volume is around €770 million >Rheinmetall has won a pioneering land forces order of pan-European and NATO-wide significance. The British Ministry of Defence has contracted with the Düsseldorf-based technology group to modernize the British Army’s main battle tank fleet. In all, 148 Challenger 2 main battle tanks will be upgraded with the 120mm smoothbore main armament from Rheinmetall, together with a completely new turret structure, including a state of the art digital system architecture. Forming part of the British Army’s Challenger 2 Life Extension Project, or LEP, the modernization programme is poised to convert this tried-and-tested tank into the new Challenger 3, keeping it in service for decades to come. >The programme will take place during the 2021-2027 timeframe. Just announced in Telford (UK), the contract is worth around €770 million (£665 million).
Why don't you have a nice day already OP.
You just prove my point that brits were holding their fricking rifled cannon for too fricking long.
2 years ago
Anonymous
They're literally only getting rid of it for NATO standardisation reasons lmao.
The West benefitted from the Russians having to build their tanks around defending against more than just heat and APFSDS. And that still holds true today.
10 May 2021 >Rheinmetall modernizing the UK’s main battle tank Challenger 2 fleet
Order volume is around €770 million >Rheinmetall has won a pioneering land forces order of pan-European and NATO-wide significance. The British Ministry of Defence has contracted with the Düsseldorf-based technology group to modernize the British Army’s main battle tank fleet. In all, 148 Challenger 2 main battle tanks will be upgraded with the 120mm smoothbore main armament from Rheinmetall, together with a completely new turret structure, including a state of the art digital system architecture. Forming part of the British Army’s Challenger 2 Life Extension Project, or LEP, the modernization programme is poised to convert this tried-and-tested tank into the new Challenger 3, keeping it in service for decades to come. >The programme will take place during the 2021-2027 timeframe. Just announced in Telford (UK), the contract is worth around €770 million (£665 million).
Lol imagine thinking performance against the Iraqis is impressive
Your threads aren't impressive at all
2 years ago
Anonymous
I know I did, anon.
https://i.imgur.com/u4PUKMK.jpg
Why do vatniks and /misc/Black folk seethe so much about us? Nobody else gets so many seething threads made about them. We're a very small country with a not very big military, and we try to keep our domestic defence industry alive through difficult times, which is frankly what all countries should be doing.
It's just a Florida man who can't afford a proper bag who is apparently fed up of Brits bants.
In short, a little pussy b***h.
2 years ago
Anonymous
What's with Florida man, is he the spawn of a British sailor on shore leave who left for a pack of cigarettes?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>how to spot a newbie
Floridatard has been making thread after thread for years about muh russia and china don’t have a GMLRS equivalent and warrior ifv threads
2 years ago
Anonymous
This.
Warriortard is cringe. You can tell it's him by his overly defensive position on the Bradley, the use of this isn't impressive at all, his poor gay tools and wallet (if he is baited into posting images again) and of course the same image of the Warrior and Warrior based threads also samegays like hell.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Bong broken
2 years ago
Anonymous
Brad busted!
2 years ago
Anonymous
God damn Bradley’s are cool
2 years ago
Anonymous
have a nice day florida/warriortard
2 years ago
Anonymous
What’s with foreigners always being blasted about florida?
>Second most deployed Western IFV >Biggest K/D of any Western IFV only 5 lost >Tough as frick >Casually raids Iraqi prisons to free its boys
Nah warriors based af even if the turret is meh
>Biggest K/D of any Western IFV only 5 lost
Source? The Bradley hasn’t lost much more than 5 and has killed an order of magnitude more vehicles than the warrior
You’re thinking of iraq 2. Not many were lost in the first gulf war, despite their insane kill record. You’re not doing the warrior any favors pitting it against the Bradley.
Lol bro you said >Source? The Bradley hasn’t lost much more than 5
Now your moving the goalposts with
>You’re thinking of iraq 2. Not many were lost in the first gulf war, despite their insane kill record.
Who gives a frick when they were lost you insufferable homosexual over 170 have been destroyed vs 5 warriors, thus confirming what you questioned the warrior has the best K/D of any Western MBT just like the Challenger. Cope more
That isn’t impressive at all when you consider how much more combat the Bradley has seen. Plus the whole non stabilized gun makes it pretty shit
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'll take that as your concession. >reverts to b-but stabiliser
This is the circlejerk of warrior gay, how long was your ban?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Your original post was the concession. After the flaws of the warrior were pointed out you moved the goalpost with muh hardly deployed 5 deaths cope
2 years ago
Anonymous
It must have been a month at least, or he had finally got VPN who knows
The board got substantially less shit when he left and stopped samegayging to push narratives on all sorts of threads.
2 years ago
Anonymous
The delusion in this post
2 years ago
Anonymous
That isn't impressive at all
2 years ago
Anonymous
Kill
Yourself
OP
The world, and this board, would be better off if you ended it already
Just ask the brits how many FF incidents caused by A10's and they'll tell you about it lmao
A10 pilots are bred moronic.
2 years ago
Anonymous
unironically the bongs are biggest hypocritical braggart/complainers ever, they don't do anything but complain about the US while also sucking themselves off that they "won" in planned exercises that the US hosts for their benefit and edification.
Both tanks were designed for relatively static defence against soviets who would have had overwhelming vehicle number advantages.
It's an IFV, it's gonna get disabled by most things hitting it.
OP uses Warrior and Bradleys as a divisionary wedge, they're both better than anything Russia put out, and they're both gonna be replaced in the next 5-20 years.
this shouldn't be a revelation in any capacity, the british cannot make good armored vehicles. they've had 100 fricking years to try and haven't made 1 good one
Why do vatniks and /misc/Black folk seethe so much about us? Nobody else gets so many seething threads made about them. We're a very small country with a not very big military, and we try to keep our domestic defence industry alive through difficult times, which is frankly what all countries should be doing.
Lot of hostility going on between friends itt. Let’s all just take a moment to recognize the absolute success of the GMLRS couples with the HIMARS. Such forethought put into military designs is what ensures the military dominance of western aligned nations. Let’s all just take a minute and thank America
This is cap. Starstreak is the best manpad in the world. The NLAW halted the Russian advance. The chally 2 is the most successful tank in history. Go back to fricking your sister cletus
That's a Recon Vehicle m8?
Here's another with a nice story of another instance of US incompetence and terrible gunnery maybe they should have used the Rifled gun like the bongs?
>They had stopped to take the surrender of Iraqi troops, when one Scorpion was hit in the front by a round from a US M1 tank, firing from about 1500 m to the north. The driver escaped without injury, but a soldier walking alongside received shrapnel wounds.
Imagine not being able to kill anyone in a scorpion with a tank from 1500m but a bong can kill a tank from 5100m.
reason why the Warrior had the meme Gun/Turret/No Stab iirc is that its supposed to function fully even when all other system failed, aka electronics and engine. On one hand seem plausible, on the other hand if all other systems failed that probably means the Warrior is good as dead
I really don't get this shitpost gimmick, I really don't. Even when he gets corrected about his assertions (it only has 4 rounds in its gun) he carries on. Is it trying to be /k/ famous like peak oil schizo and armatard? Why would you want to be famous on /k/ for being known as an idiot?
That would be BMP-1.
kek no
What kind of sickness does this poster suffer from? That isn’t my wallet
Lol you use the same image every time you wierdo. I'm sorry everything you buy is from Amazon, is it because you don't leave the basement?
>thinks everyone on the internet is le florida boogeyman
>doesn’t know that florida doesn’t have basements
kek yes.
BMP-1 looks great on paper but total crap in real use.
Largest paper tiger AFV in the history.
Its hilarious when this piece of shot provoked knee jerk reaction from the West.
Israels who faced them first in the war and captured hundreds of them found them absolutely useless and wrote them all off. When at the same time they put other captured red AFVs to the great use (T-55, T-62).
The purpose of this post is to remind you that OP is one obsessed man from Florida that is obsessed with the warrior. He also cannot afford a decent tool bag or stool.
What sort of cope is this? I see this picture posted fairly regularly by Russian defense Twitter accounts. What’s the meaning of the image and why do vatsisters keep posting it
Lol its over bro, you use the same responses everytime. I feel bad that you have to use a wallet from Amazon lol do you want to share with the group your stool and tool bag while bragging about your tube job?
That would be the HS-30. The only thing wrong with the warrior is the choice of armament, which could be fixed by the bongs relatively quickly by just dropping in a Bradley turret. Kuwait did something similar.
Kuwait didn't do that, the UK did.
The UK had loads of plans to upgraed the RARDEN. But since the Cold War ended, there was no point.
Warrior was fast, reliable, well armoured, and carried what it needed to. The turret's upgraded woes were a post Cold War element.
Can think of a lot worse vehicles than one that proved itself in two conventional wars and a frickload of COIN with no real hard losses.
What's wrong with it?
It’s got a non stabilized gun so it can fire on the move. It’s also fed by 3 round clips instead of having dual feed belts like everyone else
RARDEN is hand-fed? Really?
Clip fed. I didn’t say hand
Care to explain for those of us on medication and not monitoring the status of who is banned on this anonymous board
You are the one on meds since you made warrior threads literally every day for months on end.
It's a real coincidence really is all I'm saying that all the moronic shitposting just happened to start the same time your warrior threads started.
Archives exist, and stop samegayging.
I’m sorry but this is the first time I made a thread discussing the warriors flaws. It’s not like it’s flaws aren’t well known so I guess it makes sense that people have pointed them out here in the past.
You are a humungous lying homosexual hat says this every thread and you should have a nice day already
When I tell you to take your meds I’m not doing it to be funny, I genuinely hope you take them to get better. Your unhealthy obsession with some dude who may or may not have said similar things to what I’m saying is glaring. Do you think all f-35 threads are started by the same guy as wel?
Cmon man, get some new material
>the gun isn’t stabilized
I’m gunna need a sauce on that. I find it hard to believe the brits would slap a non stabilized gun onto their ifv when everyone else at the time was using stabilized guns. I’m not saying you’re wrong but it just seems like cap
Its even more. Vertical elevation is hand crank only like on WWII tanks. No servos.
>Compared to contemporary American and Soviet IFVs, the Warrior’s turret lacked any kind of FCS or stabilization
>The base model is the FV510 Warrior Section Vehicle armed with a non-stabilized 30 mm Rarden cannon and coaxial 7.62 mm machine gun in a two-man turret.
http://www.military-today.com/apc/mcv_80_warrior.htm
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/britains-fv510-warrior-ifv-overrated-or-underappreciated-190148
Afaik only desert warrior and that new with 30mm cannon has stabilisation but after all you are talking about nation that still has rifled cannon in mbt
>*scoffs* nation that still has rifled cannon in mbt
And now in the real world
>A Challenger with the callsign 11B fired at an Iraqi main battle tank from a distance of more than 5,100 meters – just above three miles – with an armor-piercing fin-stabilized discarding-sabot round, the longest tank-on-tank kill ever.
>EVER
Singular events aren’t impressive
yea, because others were just using ATGMs to make their life easier.
You just prove my point that brits were holding their fricking rifled cannon for too fricking long.
They're literally only getting rid of it for NATO standardisation reasons lmao.
The West benefitted from the Russians having to build their tanks around defending against more than just heat and APFSDS. And that still holds true today.
10 May 2021
>Rheinmetall modernizing the UK’s main battle tank Challenger 2 fleet
Order volume is around €770 million
>Rheinmetall has won a pioneering land forces order of pan-European and NATO-wide significance. The British Ministry of Defence has contracted with the Düsseldorf-based technology group to modernize the British Army’s main battle tank fleet. In all, 148 Challenger 2 main battle tanks will be upgraded with the 120mm smoothbore main armament from Rheinmetall, together with a completely new turret structure, including a state of the art digital system architecture. Forming part of the British Army’s Challenger 2 Life Extension Project, or LEP, the modernization programme is poised to convert this tried-and-tested tank into the new Challenger 3, keeping it in service for decades to come. >The programme will take place during the 2021-2027 timeframe. Just announced in Telford (UK), the contract is worth around €770 million (£665 million).
Why don't you have a nice day already OP.
You didn’t respond to OP
Your threads aren't impressive at all
I know I did, anon.
It's just a Florida man who can't afford a proper bag who is apparently fed up of Brits bants.
In short, a little pussy b***h.
What's with Florida man, is he the spawn of a British sailor on shore leave who left for a pack of cigarettes?
>how to spot a newbie
Floridatard has been making thread after thread for years about muh russia and china don’t have a GMLRS equivalent and warrior ifv threads
This.
Warriortard is cringe. You can tell it's him by his overly defensive position on the Bradley, the use of this isn't impressive at all, his poor gay tools and wallet (if he is baited into posting images again) and of course the same image of the Warrior and Warrior based threads also samegays like hell.
Bong broken
Brad busted!
God damn Bradley’s are cool
have a nice day florida/warriortard
What’s with foreigners always being blasted about florida?
Not op but it’s an “auto cannon” with 4 round manually changed magazines, it also has hand cranked elevation iirc
Nah m8, slap a cage on toppa that little beauty and yer good to go innit
That's not a problem though, because mechanized brigades are physically impossible.
Warriortard appears when a few "other spammers" get unbanned
Wow what a surprise.
>appears when a few "other spammers" get unbanned
Who are you referencing? Did you think people would just take your word at face value?
>Second most deployed Western IFV
>Biggest K/D of any Western IFV only 5 lost
>Tough as frick
>Casually raids Iraqi prisons to free its boys
Nah warriors based af even if the turret is meh
>Biggest K/D of any Western IFV only 5 lost
Source? The Bradley hasn’t lost much more than 5 and has killed an order of magnitude more vehicles than the warrior
A frick ton of Bradley's have been lost dude wtf are you talking about, they were literal death traps in the beginning.
You’re thinking of iraq 2. Not many were lost in the first gulf war, despite their insane kill record. You’re not doing the warrior any favors pitting it against the Bradley.
Lol bro you said
>Source? The Bradley hasn’t lost much more than 5
Now your moving the goalposts with
>You’re thinking of iraq 2. Not many were lost in the first gulf war, despite their insane kill record.
Who gives a frick when they were lost you insufferable homosexual over 170 have been destroyed vs 5 warriors, thus confirming what you questioned the warrior has the best K/D of any Western MBT just like the Challenger. Cope more
That isn’t impressive at all when you consider how much more combat the Bradley has seen. Plus the whole non stabilized gun makes it pretty shit
I'll take that as your concession.
>reverts to b-but stabiliser
This is the circlejerk of warrior gay, how long was your ban?
Your original post was the concession. After the flaws of the warrior were pointed out you moved the goalpost with muh hardly deployed 5 deaths cope
It must have been a month at least, or he had finally got VPN who knows
The board got substantially less shit when he left and stopped samegayging to push narratives on all sorts of threads.
The delusion in this post
That isn't impressive at all
Kill
Yourself
OP
The world, and this board, would be better off if you ended it already
That isn't impressive at all
>17 to blue on blue
how
what vehicle do they had that could’ve been even mistaken to that tall thing
It’s not tall from a birds eye perspective. Plus I’m sure a-10 pilots on the gulf were drink with bloodlust
Are you fricking kidding that thing was hit by everything Apaches Abrams A10s, operator quality is very lacking. Not impressive at all.
Americans are moronic
Just ask the brits how many FF incidents caused by A10's and they'll tell you about it lmao
A10 pilots are bred moronic.
unironically the bongs are biggest hypocritical braggart/complainers ever, they don't do anything but complain about the US while also sucking themselves off that they "won" in planned exercises that the US hosts for their benefit and edification.
Kill
Self
Warriotard
Both tanks were designed for relatively static defence against soviets who would have had overwhelming vehicle number advantages.
It's an IFV, it's gonna get disabled by most things hitting it.
OP uses Warrior and Bradleys as a divisionary wedge, they're both better than anything Russia put out, and they're both gonna be replaced in the next 5-20 years.
Lol imagine thinking performance against the Iraqis is impressive
this shouldn't be a revelation in any capacity, the british cannot make good armored vehicles. they've had 100 fricking years to try and haven't made 1 good one
This is OP samegayging attempting to manufacture narratives.
Note the times between posts.
At least it's not riveted.
Underrated post.
There’s a reason military commanders call it “fartqueef”
Lol at bongs and vatniks fighting over who has the most moronic fighting vehicle. Really clarifies what these people’s brains suffer from
Warrior:
>3 round clips
>No stabilization
>1 Milan missile (if you're lucky)
>Aluminium Armor
>1 engine
>75kph on road/50kph off road
A-10:
>1174 round belt.
>FCS stabilized gun
>6 maverick missiles
>Titanium Armor
>2 engines
>240kph on road/ 676kph off road
What were the British thinking?
The warrior was a sitting duck!
>Be Bradley
>Get friendly fired by:
>Apache
>A10
>Abrams
>Gravity
>Has a stabiliser tho
What was the US thinking don't they recognise their own vehicles! How did this happen 12 (Twelve) times!
The british produced the BMD?
Warrior is shit but original BMP was worse. Marder is worse too
I'd still take one, send it here
That's not a BMD.
Why do vatniks and /misc/Black folk seethe so much about us? Nobody else gets so many seething threads made about them. We're a very small country with a not very big military, and we try to keep our domestic defence industry alive through difficult times, which is frankly what all countries should be doing.
>Nobody else gets so many seething threads made about them
There’s a lot more seethe about US threads. Bongs playing second fiddle yet again
Lot of hostility going on between friends itt. Let’s all just take a moment to recognize the absolute success of the GMLRS couples with the HIMARS. Such forethought put into military designs is what ensures the military dominance of western aligned nations. Let’s all just take a minute and thank America
Thanks america
have a nice day OP.
This is cap. Starstreak is the best manpad in the world. The NLAW halted the Russian advance. The chally 2 is the most successful tank in history. Go back to fricking your sister cletus
The Infantry Fighting Virgin fears the mighty Thunderchad.
That's a Recon Vehicle m8?
Here's another with a nice story of another instance of US incompetence and terrible gunnery maybe they should have used the Rifled gun like the bongs?
>They had stopped to take the surrender of Iraqi troops, when one Scorpion was hit in the front by a round from a US M1 tank, firing from about 1500 m to the north. The driver escaped without injury, but a soldier walking alongside received shrapnel wounds.
Imagine not being able to kill anyone in a scorpion with a tank from 1500m but a bong can kill a tank from 5100m.
And also the worst one post Cold War
The warrior was pretty bad but the marder was the worst western IFV
>its another thread by some guy pretending to be some guy from florida
It's performed better in any conflict vs any BMP or BMD
So it can't be the worst
reason why the Warrior had the meme Gun/Turret/No Stab iirc is that its supposed to function fully even when all other system failed, aka electronics and engine. On one hand seem plausible, on the other hand if all other systems failed that probably means the Warrior is good as dead
I really don't get this shitpost gimmick, I really don't. Even when he gets corrected about his assertions (it only has 4 rounds in its gun) he carries on. Is it trying to be /k/ famous like peak oil schizo and armatard? Why would you want to be famous on /k/ for being known as an idiot?