The purpose of this thread is to remind you that the British produced the worst infantry fighting vehicle of the Cold War

The purpose of this thread is to remind you that the British produced the worst infantry fighting vehicle of the Cold War

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That would be BMP-1.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      kek no

      https://i.imgur.com/BzgY1O3.jpg

      The purpose of this post is to remind you that OP is one obsessed man from Florida that is obsessed with the warrior. He also cannot afford a decent tool bag or stool.

      What kind of sickness does this poster suffer from? That isn’t my wallet

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Lol you use the same image every time you wierdo. I'm sorry everything you buy is from Amazon, is it because you don't leave the basement?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >thinks everyone on the internet is le florida boogeyman
          >doesn’t know that florida doesn’t have basements

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        kek yes.
        BMP-1 looks great on paper but total crap in real use.
        Largest paper tiger AFV in the history.
        Its hilarious when this piece of shot provoked knee jerk reaction from the West.

        Israels who faced them first in the war and captured hundreds of them found them absolutely useless and wrote them all off. When at the same time they put other captured red AFVs to the great use (T-55, T-62).

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The purpose of this post is to remind you that OP is one obsessed man from Florida that is obsessed with the warrior. He also cannot afford a decent tool bag or stool.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What sort of cope is this? I see this picture posted fairly regularly by Russian defense Twitter accounts. What’s the meaning of the image and why do vatsisters keep posting it

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Lol its over bro, you use the same responses everytime. I feel bad that you have to use a wallet from amazon lol do you want to share with the group your stool and tool bag while bragging about your tube job?

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That would be the HS-30. The only thing wrong with the warrior is the choice of armament, which could be fixed by the bongs relatively quickly by just dropping in a Bradley turret. Kuwait did something similar.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Kuwait didn't do that, the UK did.

      The UK had loads of plans to upgraed the RARDEN. But since the Cold War ended, there was no point.

      Warrior was fast, reliable, well armoured, and carried what it needed to. The turret's upgraded woes were a post Cold War element.

      Can think of a lot worse vehicles than one that proved itself in two conventional wars and a fuckload of COIN with no real hard losses.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What's wrong with it?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It’s got a non stabilized gun so it can fire on the move. It’s also fed by 3 round clips instead of having dual feed belts like everyone else

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        RARDEN is hand-fed? Really?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Clip fed. I didn’t say hand

          Warriortard appears when a few "other spammers" get unbanned
          Wow what a surprise.

          Care to explain for those of us on medication and not monitoring the status of who is banned on this anonymous board

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You are the one on meds since you made warrior threads literally every day for months on end.
            It's a real coincidence really is all I'm saying that all the retarded shitposting just happened to start the same time your warrior threads started.

            >appears when a few "other spammers" get unbanned
            Who are you referencing? Did you think people would just take your word at face value?

            Archives exist, and stop samefagging.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Lol its over bro, you use the same responses everytime. I feel bad that you have to use a wallet from amazon lol do you want to share with the group your stool and tool bag while bragging about your tube job?

              I’m sorry but this is the first time I made a thread discussing the warriors flaws. It’s not like it’s flaws aren’t well known so I guess it makes sense that people have pointed them out here in the past.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You are a humungous lying gay hat says this every thread and you should have a nice day already

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                When I tell you to take your meds I’m not doing it to be funny, I genuinely hope you take them to get better. Your unhealthy obsession with some dude who may or may not have said similar things to what I’m saying is glaring. Do you think all f-35 threads are started by the same guy as wel?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Cmon man, get some new material

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >the gun isn’t stabilized
        I’m gunna need a sauce on that. I find it hard to believe the brits would slap a non stabilized gun onto their ifv when everyone else at the time was using stabilized guns. I’m not saying you’re wrong but it just seems like cap

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Its even more. Vertical elevation is hand crank only like on WWII tanks. No servos.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Compared to contemporary American and Soviet IFVs, the Warrior’s turret lacked any kind of FCS or stabilization
          >The base model is the FV510 Warrior Section Vehicle armed with a non-stabilized 30 mm Rarden cannon and coaxial 7.62 mm machine gun in a two-man turret.

          http://www.military-today.com/apc/mcv_80_warrior.htm
          https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/britains-fv510-warrior-ifv-overrated-or-underappreciated-190148

          Afaik only desert warrior and that new with 30mm cannon has stabilisation but after all you are talking about nation that still has rifled cannon in mbt

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >*scoffs* nation that still has rifled cannon in mbt
            And now in the real world
            >A Challenger with the callsign 11B fired at an Iraqi main battle tank from a distance of more than 5,100 meters – just above three miles – with an armor-piercing fin-stabilized discarding-sabot round, the longest tank-on-tank kill ever.
            >EVER

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Singular events aren’t impressive

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              yea, because others were just using ATGMs to make their life easier.

              10 May 2021
              >Rheinmetall modernizing the UK’s main battle tank Challenger 2 fleet
              Order volume is around €770 million
              >Rheinmetall has won a pioneering land forces order of pan-European and NATO-wide significance. The British Ministry of Defence has contracted with the Düsseldorf-based technology group to modernize the British Army’s main battle tank fleet. In all, 148 Challenger 2 main battle tanks will be upgraded with the 120mm smoothbore main armament from Rheinmetall, together with a completely new turret structure, including a state of the art digital system architecture. Forming part of the British Army’s Challenger 2 Life Extension Project, or LEP, the modernization programme is poised to convert this tried-and-tested tank into the new Challenger 3, keeping it in service for decades to come. >The programme will take place during the 2021-2027 timeframe. Just announced in Telford (UK), the contract is worth around €770 million (£665 million).

              Why don't you have a nice day already OP.

              You just prove my point that brits were holding their fucking rifled cannon for too fucking long.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They're literally only getting rid of it for NATO standardisation reasons lmao.
                The West benefitted from the Russians having to build their tanks around defending against more than just heat and APFSDS. And that still holds true today.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            10 May 2021
            >Rheinmetall modernizing the UK’s main battle tank Challenger 2 fleet
            Order volume is around €770 million
            >Rheinmetall has won a pioneering land forces order of pan-European and NATO-wide significance. The British Ministry of Defence has contracted with the Düsseldorf-based technology group to modernize the British Army’s main battle tank fleet. In all, 148 Challenger 2 main battle tanks will be upgraded with the 120mm smoothbore main armament from Rheinmetall, together with a completely new turret structure, including a state of the art digital system architecture. Forming part of the British Army’s Challenger 2 Life Extension Project, or LEP, the modernization programme is poised to convert this tried-and-tested tank into the new Challenger 3, keeping it in service for decades to come. >The programme will take place during the 2021-2027 timeframe. Just announced in Telford (UK), the contract is worth around €770 million (£665 million).

            Why don't you have a nice day already OP.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              You didn’t respond to OP

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Singular events aren’t impressive

                Lol imagine thinking performance against the Iraqis is impressive

                Your threads aren't impressive at all

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I know I did, anon.

                https://i.imgur.com/u4PUKMK.jpg

                Why do vatniks and 4chanmorons seethe so much about us? Nobody else gets so many seething threads made about them. We're a very small country with a not very big military, and we try to keep our domestic defence industry alive through difficult times, which is frankly what all countries should be doing.

                It's just a Florida man who can't afford a proper bag who is apparently fed up of Brits bants.
                In short, a little pussy bitch.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What's with Florida man, is he the spawn of a British sailor on shore leave who left for a pack of cigarettes?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >how to spot a newfag
                Floridatard has been making thread after thread for years about muh russia and china don’t have a GMLRS equivalent and warrior ifv threads

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                This.
                Warriortard is cringe. You can tell it's him by his overly defensive position on the Bradley, the use of this isn't impressive at all, his poor fag tools and wallet (if he is baited into posting images again) and of course the same image of the Warrior and Warrior based threads also samefags like hell.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Bong broken

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Brad busted!

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                God damn Bradley’s are cool

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                have a nice day florida/warriortard

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What’s with foreigners always being blasted about florida?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not op but it’s an “auto cannon” with 4 round manually changed magazines, it also has hand cranked elevation iirc

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nah m8, slap a cage on toppa that little beauty and yer good to go innit

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That's not a problem though, because mechanized brigades are physically impossible.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Warriortard appears when a few "other spammers" get unbanned
    Wow what a surprise.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >appears when a few "other spammers" get unbanned
      Who are you referencing? Did you think people would just take your word at face value?

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Second most deployed Western IFV
    >Biggest K/D of any Western IFV only 5 lost
    >Tough as fuck
    >Casually raids Iraqi prisons to free its boys
    Nah warriors based af even if the turret is meh

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Biggest K/D of any Western IFV only 5 lost
      Source? The Bradley hasn’t lost much more than 5 and has killed an order of magnitude more vehicles than the warrior

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        A fuck ton of Bradley's have been lost dude wtf are you talking about, they were literal death traps in the beginning.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You’re thinking of iraq 2. Not many were lost in the first gulf war, despite their insane kill record. You’re not doing the warrior any favors pitting it against the Bradley.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Lol bro you said
            >Source? The Bradley hasn’t lost much more than 5

            Now your moving the goalposts with

            >You’re thinking of iraq 2. Not many were lost in the first gulf war, despite their insane kill record.

            Who gives a fuck when they were lost you insufferable gay over 170 have been destroyed vs 5 warriors, thus confirming what you questioned the warrior has the best K/D of any Western MBT just like the Challenger. Cope more

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              That isn’t impressive at all when you consider how much more combat the Bradley has seen. Plus the whole non stabilized gun makes it pretty shit

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'll take that as your concession.
                >reverts to b-but stabiliser
                This is the circlejerk of warrior fag, how long was your ban?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Your original post was the concession. After the flaws of the warrior were pointed out you moved the goalpost with muh hardly deployed 5 deaths cope

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It must have been a month at least, or he had finally got VPN who knows
                The board got substantially less shit when he left and stopped samefagging to push narratives on all sorts of threads.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The delusion in this post

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That isn't impressive at all

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Kill
                Yourself
                OP
                The world, and this board, would be better off if you ended it already

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That isn't impressive at all

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >17 to blue on blue
            how
            what vehicle do they had that could’ve been even mistaken to that tall thing

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              It’s not tall from a birds eye perspective. Plus I’m sure a-10 pilots on the gulf were drink with bloodlust

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Are you fucking kidding that thing was hit by everything Apaches Abrams A10s, operator quality is very lacking. Not impressive at all.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Americans are retarded

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Just ask the brits how many FF incidents caused by A10's and they'll tell you about it lmao
              A10 pilots are bred retarded.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                unironically the bongs are biggest hypocritical braggart/complainers ever, they don't do anything but complain about the US while also sucking themselves off that they "won" in planned exercises that the US hosts for their benefit and edification.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Kill
                Self
                Warriotard

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Both tanks were designed for relatively static defence against soviets who would have had overwhelming vehicle number advantages.
          It's an IFV, it's gonna get disabled by most things hitting it.
          OP uses Warrior and Bradleys as a divisionary wedge, they're both better than anything Russia put out, and they're both gonna be replaced in the next 5-20 years.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Lol imagine thinking performance against the Iraqis is impressive

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    this shouldn't be a revelation in any capacity, the british cannot make good armored vehicles. they've had 100 fucking years to try and haven't made 1 good one

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is OP samefagging attempting to manufacture narratives.
      Note the times between posts.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    At least it's not riveted.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Underrated post.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There’s a reason military commanders call it “fartqueef”

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Lol at bongs and vatniks fighting over who has the most retarded fighting vehicle. Really clarifies what these people’s brains suffer from

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Warrior:
    >3 round clips
    >No stabilization
    >1 Milan missile (if you're lucky)
    >Aluminium Armor
    >1 engine
    >75kph on road/50kph off road

    A-10:
    >1174 round belt.
    >FCS stabilized gun
    >6 maverick missiles
    >Titanium Armor
    >2 engines
    >240kph on road/ 676kph off road

    What were the British thinking?
    The warrior was a sitting duck!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Be Bradley
      >Get friendly fired by:
      >Apache
      >A10
      >Abrams
      >Gravity
      >Has a stabiliser tho

      What was the US thinking don't they recognise their own vehicles! How did this happen 12 (Twelve) times!

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The british produced the BMD?

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Warrior is shit but original BMP was worse. Marder is worse too

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'd still take one, send it here

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That's not a BMD.

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why do vatniks and 4chanmorons seethe so much about us? Nobody else gets so many seething threads made about them. We're a very small country with a not very big military, and we try to keep our domestic defence industry alive through difficult times, which is frankly what all countries should be doing.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Nobody else gets so many seething threads made about them
      There’s a lot more seethe about US threads. Bongs playing second fiddle yet again

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Lot of hostility going on between friends itt. Let’s all just take a moment to recognize the absolute success of the GMLRS couples with the HIMARS. Such forethought put into military designs is what ensures the military dominance of western aligned nations. Let’s all just take a minute and thank America

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Thanks america

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      have a nice day OP.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is cap. Starstreak is the best manpad in the world. The NLAW halted the Russian advance. The chally 2 is the most successful tank in history. Go back to fucking your sister cletus

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The Infantry Fighting Virgin fears the mighty Thunderchad.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's a Recon Vehicle m8?
      Here's another with a nice story of another instance of US incompetence and terrible gunnery maybe they should have used the Rifled gun like the bongs?

      >They had stopped to take the surrender of Iraqi troops, when one Scorpion was hit in the front by a round from a US M1 tank, firing from about 1500 m to the north. The driver escaped without injury, but a soldier walking alongside received shrapnel wounds.

      Imagine not being able to kill anyone in a scorpion with a tank from 1500m but a bong can kill a tank from 5100m.

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    And also the worst one post Cold War

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The warrior was pretty bad but the marder was the worst western IFV

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >its another thread by some guy pretending to be some guy from florida

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's performed better in any conflict vs any BMP or BMD
    So it can't be the worst

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    reason why the Warrior had the meme Gun/Turret/No Stab iirc is that its supposed to function fully even when all other system failed, aka electronics and engine. On one hand seem plausible, on the other hand if all other systems failed that probably means the Warrior is good as dead

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I really don't get this shitpost gimmick, I really don't. Even when he gets corrected about his assertions (it only has 4 rounds in its gun) he carries on. Is it trying to be PrepHole famous like peak oil schizo and armatard? Why would you want to be famous on PrepHole for being known as an idiot?

Your email address will not be published.