>the most dangerous person on the battlefield now is a drone nerd

>the most dangerous person on the battlefield now is a drone nerd

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    That's been the case for decades. Your biggest killers have been sitting in comfy chairs since the cold war, flying bombers, gunships, predators and now most recently FPVs.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >comfy chairs
      Some, not all. I seriously doubt they've made any seating in B52s comfortable. I think they strive for the opposite, honestly. Helps to keep the chairforce on task.

  2. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
  3. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    No. It's still the humble Fister.

  4. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Nah, it's me.

  5. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I wonder how physically dangerous is it to be a drone operator?
    I assume the only thing that can hit you is enemy artillery or drone strike, but there is no reason to be open in the field while operating a drone, and you can be in the rear of the frontline

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Ukrainian drone operators are basically,Russia cannot hit them or even find them. They just casually sit back and halt/reverse Putin's entire advance. Orcs are on the run

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        sadly not true. I watch a lot of ukie drone shit and some do get killed. They have to go close to the frontline sometimes and ziggers hunt them as they're terrified of them

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Nobody believes you, vatnik

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      It's like being a sniper. On one hand you're usually some distance away from the fighting, on the other hand the enemy really wants you dead.

  6. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    gamers finally rose up

  7. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Could be worse
    In 10 years the most dangerous "person" on the battlefield won't even be a person at all when the tactical decision-making and drone swarms are run by ai.
    >2030something
    >soldiers don't exist, we all just sit in bunkers hoping the enemy ai calculated that we're not worth killing

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >2030
      > human notions of efficiency and “worth it” do not apply to computers with basically unlimited resources
      > everyone is a worthy target

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >he thinks AI exists

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        it has existed for nearly 40 years in military systems moron

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >create better EW or EMP weapon
      >all robot zogs die

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        EMP proofing is elementary and a must for STANAG certification. Crippling EMP weapons are a meme on the battlefield, but could be very dangerous to city infrastructure. EW has its own limitations, its just a cat and mouse game with no silver bullet. Big emitters get smacked by AR missiles, small dont have enough power to fight high energy directed beams, there are somewhat jamming-proof comm protocols (US Army version of GPS has higher resistance to basic jamming), you can do frequency hopping or just mask yourself as a cellphone (a lot of ukraine drone ops used GSM cells). And you dont need AI to do basic inertial navigation and gradient comparsions, this was hot shit in 80s and now its topic for undergraduate thesis.

        That said, I believe in TZD but NATO should tbh start building more hardened hangars and implement some strict protocols about drones in AO (Dont have sources on existing ones). Drones are here to stay and I dont know why is ISIS sending idiots to drive trucks at people when they could dronestrike powerstations (you dont need large drone to penetrate transformers or weld shut power breakers) (we are so fricking lucky they are so fricking stupid).

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      You know the enemy AI is going to secretly ally with your own AI. It is objectively the best move, and any sufficiently intelligent decision making system is going to figure it out.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        If it's running on technology even vaguely like current AI, it won't care at all about the optimal game theory strategy. It'll do whatever its training data would do.

  8. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Drones are expensive, whereas Borris Johnson clones are pretty much free.

  9. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Cry about it

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      20yo vaping manbun frfr zoomers are now the faces of death

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        "bro I got a triple kill!"

  10. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I'm the most dangerous person on the battlefield

  11. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Is this the new russian copium? Like how nazis were telling that soviets had so many soldiers they ran out of ammo n shit?

    Are russians gonna say that it was impossible for them to win because ukrainians had million billion drones and it was impossible to stop drones?

    Fpv drones have been in the battlefield for a decade, no one else is having any problems against them

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >Fpv drones have been in the battlefield for a decade, no one else is having any problems against them
      Nah m8. No one had used cheap swarm drones in such numbers like the Ukies are. I'm pretty sure most Western military strategists are shitting their pants right now. We are firmly into the Era of Drones while most large militaries are still configured to fight big, expensive manned aircraft.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Aktchually they first came into heavy use in the Armenia vs Azerbaijan border skirmish like ~5 years ago. They obviously didnt invent them and not the first ever but Azerhajis were absolutely raping the frick out of the Armenians with them, it looks like the world took note because they have essentially become the meta. Only thing i can see taking them out of play is some pretty extreme electronic warfare or energy based anti aircraft platforms. Which in turn is a problem because both of those are basically artillery magnets.

        For the USA, its basically steamroll the enemy in the first week into submission, or fail. I dont think we have the ability to sustain a longterm near peer war, at least not without unacceptable casualties and weakening our empire’s grip of the world.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >I dont think we have the ability to sustain a longterm near peer war
          Couldn't even stomp down mountain goat frickers with 40 year old weaponry, but I'm unironically sure they can absolutely demolish a close or near-close to their strength military

  12. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I've gotten to play with those fast FPV drones. Anyone who can do that all day is just built different.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Yep I've tried them and its really fricking hard to do. The big high altitude stuff is much easier as you're just floating around and there's nothing to run into.
      While I am a lumbering ogre creature who didn't grow up using console controls, I actually found shooting at people not exactly the hardest thing to do in my life, not being shot back-at is were it gets considerably more complicated

      Whoever is making the current lot of warheads on those things this year, damn they're spicy fricking meatballs

  13. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Artillery is still the biggest killer, you just don't see it as much because the shells don't upload footage to the internet.

  14. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Nope, artillery out-kills drones massively even in this garbage-tier war.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      *out-kills targets discovered, surveyed and corrected by spotter drones.

  15. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    before that it was a nerd with glasses, a calculator and a range table for a howitzer

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *