armored
4 man crew
105mm main gun
fast
tracked
TANK IS TANK! enough with the MBT nonsense, ohh and btw- IFV's are tanks too! there I said it!
the M2 Bradley IS A TANK!
the M10 Booker IS A TANK
armored
4 man crew
105mm main gun
fast
tracked
TANK IS TANK! enough with the MBT nonsense, ohh and btw- IFV's are tanks too! there I said it!
the M2 Bradley IS A TANK!
It's not a tank for the sole reason that if you call it a tank, some moron is going to try to 1v1 an actual tank and die.
it's a medium tank (e.g., "battle tank") by most standards, only the deranged mind of Burgerlandia would call it "light"
the big question mark is armor, it's known that Griffin I was certified for heftier protection than ASCOD (up to 30mm), but not what the modular armor pack that made the Griffin II and the Booker so much heavier actually does
This is a light tank but a tank nonetheless.
It even has the same driver controls as an Abrams.
Just say "bump." Nobody in a warriorgay thread will be telling me, a sex haver, how sex works.
yeah
"Bottom" and "woman" are near-synonyms too. Both would worry if I suddenly stopped being able to tell them apart.
>"Bottom" and "woman" are near-synonyms
Turn off your computer and don't use the internet for a while.
If you actually think anyone but chronically online porn addicts actually believe this, then you need a time out.
man i dont even think porn addicts think like this
if leo1 or t62 is a tank wy booker cant?
Tank is just as much a doctrinal designation as it is descriptive of hardware. An armored vehicle with a large gun may or may not be a tank, depending on what job it's designed to do, and the Booker isn't going to be spearheading heavily contested breakthroughs. It's effectively an SPG.
>Warship
>Intended for surface combat
>Battleship caliber armament
>Uniform main battery
HMS M1 was a dreadnought.
No armor
is this a tank?
Yes.
what a purposefully ignorant person
Is it autism?
It’s a really bad tank so the narrative /k/ is going with is that it’s not a tank. In reality the discussion is pointless because the US will not get into a war again in which the Army does anything.
Take your meds, Sparky.
This chart is moronic, and you should feel moronic for posting it.
>the vehicle that invented the word "Tank" isn't actually a tank because it doesn't have a turret on the top
Ridiculous
"a military vehicle covered with strong metal and armed with guns. It can travel over very rough ground using wheels that move inside metal belts."
Official dictionary definition of the word by the country that invented it.
And which country would that be?
Australia
>covered with strong metal and armed with guns. It can travel over very rough ground using wheels that move inside metal belts
Behold, a tank
Only one gun. Usually there's a big main gun and the coaxial, not to mention the commander's/loader's guns.
As you wish.
It's an infantry tank
>4 man crew
>current year
This thing is an embarrassment
????