The infamous S500 is in serial production.

The infamous S500 is in serial production. Russia is developing S550, which is supposed to be capable of shooting down satellites. Do you think S600 will be developed to shoot down ICBMs?
Or is it possible that Russia wont need to intercept ICBMs since after enough satellites are downed, space becomes useless and it's all about who has the Hypersonic missile?

I mean, weapons look cool and all, but the psychopaths in power use them for some cold strategic calculations all the time.

Also, please post AA systems.

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >S500 is in serial production
    no its not
    >infamous
    lol

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you misunderstand how serial production works. it means that one unit being constructed is in front of another and so on. the s-500 has been in serial production for years.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Post some actual pictures instead of shitty CGI then
        >Russian
        >Lying
        Must be another day of the week

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >S500 is in serial production
          no its not
          >infamous
          lol

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I can tell by looking at it that it can’t shoot down satellites. No fricking way.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      yeah, I thought it was crazy too.....the pic is S500 btw, IDK what S550 was supposed to look like, IDK even how it works because it's like 4 trucks and not just one
      Anyways, this is that the missile od Favid's sling looks like, LOL

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >.the pic is S500 btw,
        >Rafael
        t. dipshit

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It's just an assblasted shill trying to shoehorn some way to shill Israeli weapons as they can't shill their own, and thank this will finally own /k/.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >.the pic is S500 btw,
            >Rafael
            t. dipshit

            the OP pic is S500 you fricking moron

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              And the israelite Stunner missile had nothing to do with this thread. Just some way for you israelite slurping vatnig shills to shoehorn israelite shit in, as you think it is the only way to actually shill against HATO.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          are you really convinced that that is Rafael AA in the pic???!?!?!

          Are shills REALLY stooping to shilling Israeli systems to own HATO? KEK. Man, that has to REALLY frick with your pride, huh, poo/vatnig/chinsect?

          wh-what?? WHAT ?
          What the frick? Am I a Russki or Amerrikanskie shills??!! WHAT?!?!?

          WHAT THE FRICK IS UP WITH THIS BOARDD???

          >wont need to intercept ICBMs since after enough satellites are downed

          >wont need to intercept ICBMs since after enough satellites are downed

          >wont need to intercept ICBMs since after enough satellites are downed

          OK, this one was given a bit without explanation, but, long story short, if we destroy a bunch of satellites, space becomes useless and we can't have any space exploration, any other satellites and any more ICBMs

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You’re so fricking moronic it’s amazing
            >posts schizobabble about destroying satellites means no nukes
            Actually sub 80 IQ
            >literally cannot read the Latin script on the missile he posted

            yeah, I thought it was crazy too.....the pic is S500 btw, IDK what S550 was supposed to look like, IDK even how it works because it's like 4 trucks and not just one
            Anyways, this is that the missile od Favid's sling looks like, LOL

            WHAT DOES IT SAY ON THIS MISSILE IVAN?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Anon the Kessler effect doesn't create a solid barrier through which no missiles can pass.
            Most of them will get through in fact, especially if they are beefy bois that are somewhat resistent to micro debris. Like ICBMs.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Post sugar

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        tactical advantage of that shape?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          So the EO/IR sensor (black circle) doesn't interfere with the MMV seeker right by it. It uses a dual seeker.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            MMW*

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I can only imagine why a missile is shaped as though it had a nose instead of a penis at the top.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Makes it look like a borzoi

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Holy shit the meme potential of a israeli missile with a beak nose.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        the snoot drooped

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      ?t=44

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >ESL title
        >extremely vatnikified grammar
        >spoken by a native English speaker
        So they just payed some fiver c**t to read a script?
        People don’t actually believe something this small can reach satellites, do they?
        It’s not that easy in rocketry

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >ESL
          >payed

          So the EO/IR sensor (black circle) doesn't interfere with the MMV seeker right by it. It uses a dual seeker.

          but that shape creates drag and makes the missile unstable

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Listen, it’s late at night

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >but that shape creates drag and makes the missile unstable
            Seems fine to me. Raytheon helped them design it, so, it should be great. Along with the US paying for it to be built at the tune of $100+ million.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah no that tiny rocket won't have enough delta v to target satellites. (Unless the ruskies just made the worlds first SSTO, which they didn't)

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    yeah

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >The infamous S500 is in serial production
    May I see the production line?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Sorry the production line got taken over so more T-55 Obr. 2023s can be sent to Vuhledar

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >OBR 2023
        they arent even slapping K5 bricks on these frickers before sending them out. I'ts straight OBR 1961 shit

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ohhh it's the dude from the other missile-related thread, i recognize this poster.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Also, this baby costs like 1 million USD per unit and is a pretty good AA tbh. I think this is probably the most underrated thing that NATO could be amassing.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Are shills REALLY stooping to shilling Israeli systems to own HATO? KEK. Man, that has to REALLY frick with your pride, huh, poo/vatnig/chinsect?

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    sounds like another wunderwaffe of which only a single digit amount will get built before Russia admits they can't produce any more

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >wont need to intercept ICBMs since after enough satellites are downed

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why would anyone waste their time with making ASAT missiles? It's a dead end capability. Hey let's just make a massive debris cloud that won't be going away and could cause serious issues for our own sats. Just jam the fricker or hack it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Why would anyone waste their time with making ASAT missiles?
      If your enemy's satellites are much better than yours homosexual.
      It would be a big blow to destroy US spy and GPS satellites.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        homie what do you think is gonna happen when they start attacking gps satellites? Your functionally moronic

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Are they still seething about Starlink?

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    These russian S300-400-500 are rather complex systems consists of multiple missiles and radars, which the russians turn into even more sub-models by upgrading older systems with modern compents and missiles. So an ukie S-300 is nothing like a russian S-300 due to the latter being upgraded to be fully digital and with new types of missiles. Stating that the S-500 is operational is meaningless, state which types of missile and which types of radar etc etc.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The same way SU-57's are in serial production. They are getting the first ten "in 2022", but Almaz Antey is booked until 2025 making S-400s. This is inline with Alexei Krivoruchko's statement. They also cost $600million USD to buy, which, Russia doesn't have. Or else the T-14 and SU-57 would be in mass production already.

      >but the following March Deputy Defense Minister Alexei Krivoruchko said it would not enter service until 2025.

      >On Thursday, Russia’s TASS news agency, citing an anonymous defense industry source, reported that the Ministry of Defense had signed a contract with manufacturer Almaz-Antey for the first ten S-500 ‘systems’, with deliveries beginning in the first half of 2022, after testing wraps up later in 2021. Almaz-Antey declined to confirm the report, however.

      https://www.19fortyfive.com/2021/07/natos-worst-nightmare-russias-s-500-air-defense-system-has-arrived/

      I've yet to see these 10 systems, though.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      lol no/ S-400 are reskinned S-300 full stop, and Ukies have the same "upgrades" because they were the ones doing the "upgrading" for the Russian Army
      and the S-500 is just a con job

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >lol no/ S-400 are reskinned S-300 full stop
        Yep, just an S-300V/VM reskinned.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      no not really the s500 doesnt have its own radar or anything at all
      its literally a new a135 a nuclear tipped interceptor
      its just a vehicle with 2-4 launchers for the new missile

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Russia
    frick off with your wunderweapons bullshit. Russia has no fricking modern vehicles left and is struggling to shoot down an Asian restaurant in bakhmut. But there's you with your fantasy shit.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >we destroyed 120% of russian tanks
      o..ok?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        i am pretty sure they changed the presentation a bit. i think it was something like
        >% of intended for invasion
        >% of russian total
        and now they only show the former percentage

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        it literally says % of amassed forces for the initial invasion

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Russia's ground forces are bigger now than at the start of the war.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >weve lost most of iur modern equipment and over half of our professional trained personell
          >weve conscripted 300000 unmotivated volunteers and thrown them into combat training ajd also infected half of them with HIV
          >NATO FEARS RUSSIAS MIGHT

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >SERIAL PRODUCTION?
    >After decades of development hell, after your industrial base has been completely gutted by sanctions, after being reduced to sending rusting Soviet materiel to Ukraine because you are literally incapable of producing new vehicles?
    >Da.
    >May we see it?
    >Nyet.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    S600 gonna take down moon, S700 gonna turn off sun.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Best AA system in the world (even confirmed by Ukrainians), only country with hypersonic missiles in operation, have missiles that are literally named 'Satan', endless stream of cruise missiles (thousands have been launched since Feb 2022), ... How is Russia so based when it comes to missiles?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >have missiles that are literally named 'Satan'
      SS-18 Satan is the NATO call sign, it's called R-36M and like anything worthwhile from the commie era it was developed and manufactured in Ukraine, not Russia lmao

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i dont think you understand what the s500 is meant for...

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is India going to buy the S-500s soon? Probably the moment the Ukraine ware ends IMO.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Ground-launched rocket
    >Fits on a truck
    >Able to shoot down satellites

    Yeah, no.

    Go back to shilling the nuclear torpedoes or whatever bullshit wunderwaffe russians were shilling before.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Russiaboos are even more moronic than wehraboos, and a lot more obnoxious about it since last February.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    of course, and S700 will be developed to shoot down planets,
    S800 to shoot down the stars
    S900 will be able to make the big bang and will carry 4 of it in a single pod

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I heard that S569 will be shooting down planets.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      S420 shot down my dreams. F

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *