The Chinese Navy just released footage of their Type 003 Fujian conducting Sea Trials in 4K60fps.

The Chinese Navy just released footage of their Type 003 Fujian conducting Sea Trials in 4K60fps. Thoughts?: https://youtu.be/soEpAprko7w

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    How much DC equipment do they have?

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Ummmm, you’re Chinese.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    been chillin

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Implessive

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    do they have a video of it launching a plane

    also fyi spamming/flooding is against the rules

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Implessive

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    this post convinced me that China is not pathetic but actually very strong

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Where's testing the testing footage of your EMALS Chang?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      its sea trials you idiot they aint gonna launch anything till the ship is sound and safe

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      its sea trials you idiot they aint gonna launch anything till the ship is sound and safe

      Surely the Chinks wouldn't build a carrier with EMALS without even testing the technology, though.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It has been tested while in the shipyard.

        Why are you /k/opers setting yourself up for humiliation all the time?

        Like now with Russia actively winning and Ukraine loosing despite your tough NAFO talk. Cant wait to see more American shit paraded across red square and soon Tiananmen as well.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Implessive

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Where's the testing footage of It launching planes Chang?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Please stop being homosexual.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Implessive

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Its basically flawed prototype for their 004 carrier. Mainly because its lack of nuclear power can't provide all the things they want at once.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      QE is supposedly also capable of using EMALS in the future since they've got enough power generation. Nuclear power only means that you can keep the reactor going for years =/= power generation, since you're still boiling water to move a turbine to generate power.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        QE is capable of it, both could have been fitted for EMALS from the beginning and still could be refitted now but it won't happen. Gov won't spend the money and sunk-cost fallacy with the F35Bs is well entrenched now.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          *QEC

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          IIRC they originally planned for EMALS on QE, then revised the design for a ramp at greater expense.
          Dumb.
          Between that and China's carrier not being nuclear, I can't help but wonder if a huge part of carrier design for non-US powers is making sure certain other powers are generally okay or at least reluctantly accepting of certain features.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Nuclear power only means that you can keep the reactor going for years =/= power generation, since you're still boiling water to move a turbine to generate power.
        Tard, non-nuclear carriers can't sustain a sortie rate that nuclear carriers can, I doubt that this Chinese carrier can hold a candle up to Charles De Gaulle in sustained sortie rate, let alone Nimitz class.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        the queen elizabeth produces 109mw of power while the ford generates 600mw. the Type 003 Fujian is 160mw.

        Nuclear power generates far more power than conventional engines. Bet your ass that's going to limit it's capabilities.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          To add, the Ford class aircraft carrier can go around the Earth 65 times before needing to refuel.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            So it leaves those escorts behind while doing so?

            Nice. Makes it easier for China to sink them. Not that it matters, as China already sees all of your carriers and can launch more HGVs at them than you have VLS-cells.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Implessive

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, it is.
                Especially since China is the only nation with a GEOSTATIONARY SAR satellite which permanently hovers over the Pacific and tracks all of your movement 24/7 even during night-time and through cloud cover.

                https://www.csis.org/analysis/no-place-hide-look-chinas-geosynchronous-surveillance-capabilities#:~:text=In%20addition%20to%20these%20optical,satellite%20with%20a%20SAR%20payload.

                >No Place to Hide: A Look into China’s Geosynchronous Surveillance Capabilities

                No Place for a fatty mutt to hide indeed.
                Based Xi Jinping has a red button on his table and your bases and carriers around the world will go poof the moment he wishes so.

                >inb4 I NUKE YOU!!!
                lmao try it.

                China's industrial capacity can build more underground shelters and even huge underground cities housing hundreds of millions in a few years, while you are still debating the transgender surgery at schools and cant even produce a million artillery shells for your losing battle against Russia.

                We will hide in bunkers while purging the world with nuclear fires and afterwards, more of us will be alive than any whitoid on the world. We will literally use nukes to terraform the world and make some countries physically disappear from the map so that even in a thousand years their mutated grandchildren will not be able to reestablish it anymore. As for you, have fun dumping all your nukes into the Himalayan mountains, under which we will hide a billion of our people, powered by fusion reactors and nourished by genetically enhanced hydroponics.
                You know nothing about fighting the strongest industrial power in the world. An industrial power whose industries actually produce things and isnt just wallstreet selling your mortgage debts to other israelites and calling it an "industry".

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Implessive
                >Verification not required.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                meds now sonny

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >satellite can cover 60 million square miles of ocean.
                Lol ok
                >satellites can track subs
                Each can carry 100 nuclear warheads and the US has 72 nuclear powered subs.

                The Chinese navy lacks the logistics to leave 200 miles from their shores. Building a bunch of cheap shitty small ships doesn't make a good navy.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                They do it by swiping sectors.
                And the sat is just one of many to come. China now has more spy sats than the US and this will only increase.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Each [submarine] can carry 100 nuclear warheads and the US has 72 nuclear powered subs.

                53 fast attack submarines, 14 ballistic-missile submarines and four guided-missile submarines. And for some reason you're insisting attack subs carry ICBMs?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Subs don't carry icbms, they carry slbm. . They don't need the range of an icbm because they can launch close to shore.

                And the satellites can't cover the entire pacific at once. There are massive gaps in coverage which ships and aircraft can slip through. Especially since b2s and b21s will more than likely do their missions at night. The US only has 400icbms, most nukes will come from aircraft and subs.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Anon, US attack subs don't carry any ballistic nuclear missiles.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                They're are 14 Ohio class submarines and each one can carry nearly 300 individually targeted nukes. That's plenty.

                Plus we have 20 b2 capable of carrying multiple nuke and an order of 100 b21s also capable of carrying nukes. That's thousands of nukes not even counting icbms.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                The Ohios are being retired and a gap is forming between them and the Columbias. There are now 19 B-1s on paper. All might not be combat capable, There are zero deployed B21s and those won't be operationally deployed before the end of the decade.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >That's thousands of nukes not even counting icbms.

                > approximately 540 B61 Nuclear bombs remain in active service.

                > That is not "thousands"

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Oh dear, that was an old number.

                > Updated November 2023: The current U.S. tactical nuclear arsenal is comprised of approximately 230 B61 gravity bombs in two versions, the B61-3 and B61-4.

                https://armscontrolcenter.org/u-s-nonstrategic-nuclear-weapons/

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I was counting the Ohio subs nuke in that too, not just the b61 of you could read.

                The Virginia class submarine are having cruise missiles with nukes added to them according to a couple articles in 2018. And there are 22 Virginia class subs. They already had a nuclear tomahawk but it was retired.

                I also said 100 planned b21s, not that we already have them. The f35 is stealth and capable of delivering the b61 12 as well.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                > The expansion of Russian and Chinese regional nuclear forces made this decision necessary. Russia maintains about two thousand “tactical” nuclear weapons that can be deployed on land, at sea, and delivered by aircraft. China possesses about one thousand regional missiles that can be armed with conventional or nuclear warheads. None of these weapons are limited by treaty, and they far exceed US regional nuclear capabilities.

                And

                > SLCM-N program is planned to achieve operational capability by 2034.

                And of course it won't. Everything the US military touches is sliding to the right.

                https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/the-us-is-building-a-nuclear-sea-launched-cruise-missile-congress-must-make-sure-its-built-right/

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Correction, we have 19 B2 bombers now. One got damaged and it will not be repaired as it is too expensive to repair and with the B21 Raider on the way the Air Force decided to drop that one officially sometime in 2025.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Germany has SAR satellite constellation, you think they will say no when Americans say to give over the controls?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                German and Japanese GEO sats are for weather monitoring, resolution about 400 to 1km. Useless for military matters.

                LEO SAR sats is nothing new. They still need to pass and will only be able to every few days.

                China's geostationary SAR is the gamechanger here, since it literally stares permanently at the Pacific in addition to having very decent resolution that is further improved through machine learning and AI shape recognition.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Let me see the resolution of Chiner's geo stationary SAR sat.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                > Few details of the satellite were provided by CASC. However the group’s “blue book” outlining plans for 2023 released in January noted the launch of a “high-orbit 20-meter [resolution] SAR satellite.” The L-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) satellite will provide all-day, all-weather observation of China and surrounding areas, boosting the country’s disaster prevention, reduction, and relief capabilities.

                So, assume they're sandbagging and the resolution is somewhat better than that.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Sorry to break it to you buddy, but even France has more ready nukes than you.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >france
                France can no longer build nukes. And China nuke numbers were based on minimum deterrence for a long time, due to the globalist pro-western presidents we had before based Xi came into power, who all believed that the West wasnt such a white supremacist piece of shit hell-bent on keeping their hegemony at all costs.

                We have now given up our minimum deterrence posture and are racing towards parity.
                With our industrial might, it will be only a few years.
                Even your Pentagon is admitting so much:

                https://www.foreignaffairs.com/china/real-motives-chinas-nuclear-expansion#:~:text=Under%20Chinese%20President%20Xi%20Jinping,caused%20deep%20concern%20in%20Washington.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                YNWBAW, you dysgenic tankie troon. Go back to leftypol and PrepHole.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                France literally restarted tritium production and is the only c**t with a recently tested ICBM delivery system.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >China's industrial capacity can build more underground shelters and even huge underground cities housing hundreds of millions in a few years,
                what good do those do you if you have no military assets, because they all got nuked?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Black person, we use TEL-based DF-41 ICBMs. Those are already based in tunnel networks like the existing Underground Great Wall network.
                China's mountains, inlcuding Tibet, which is part of China, has more creases, valleys, hidden entrances and tunnels than you and your vassals have warheads.
                Each and every of them will be used, in addition to our existing silo fields in the Gobi desert that would at least soak up a thousand of your nukes for counter-force strikes.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                China lacks first strike capabilites. good luck moving all your assets into bunkers before getting raped by subs and stealth bombers.

                The US also had anti icbm tech. They're are only 44 of them right now but if we get stuck in an arms race I'm sure the US would just build more.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                US cannot build more. You have completely deindustrialized and financialized your economy. You have to ask SK and Japan to build and maintain ships for you for fricks sake.

                China isnt about first strike anyway. That's why we have tunnels and bunkers where our TEL are driving around 24/7. There is nothing to move our assets into and knowing you, we will also have ample time to build and expand more bunkers because your country is ruled by a oligarchy of israelites first have to evacuate their pedo harem to some small island before you can even begin drafting a plan to send some 60bln to some basket case that is actively losing the war.

                Chinese speed is not a meme. American dysfunction is.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                The only shit China is known for is being a cheap copy of the west and mass corruption.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                No Chinese is this feral, you are most likely a Mongol animal from Russia or some shit.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Yewh, and they have to travel on set roads on those mountains, and uave f8xed launch sites because they're so fricking heavy and huge they just can't travel anywhere they want, and need a prepared launch pad to launch their missile. Good luck launching from you4lr cuck tunnel when your launch pads are blown up by US CMs.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              time to bring back the DDG-1000

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              it's almost amazing that you truly believe chink satilites can provide terminal guidance on a moving carrier group. jfc. even more so that you think you'd be able to do a saturation attack which would be able to overwhelm aegis. I appriciate that you admit that aegis can swat those hgvs out of the sky though, lol

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Satellites reveal the location of US CSG, then WZ-8s are launched for tracking and providing real time tracking data for the PLARF.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          the Ford also has to move the ship with that 600MW tho

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Ah yes, the famously energy self-sufficient China. With incredible domestic oil reserves. With absolutely zero reliance on foreign oil whatsoever, there's no reason for them to use nuclear.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          That's what the Northern Siberian Resource Zone is for, dummy.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >China invades taiwan
    >Singapore sinks the Fujian and liberates Fujian Province
    >Hoklo republic forms with Fujian, Taiwan and Singapore incorporated into its territory
    >rape of Beijing, a million mandarins slaughtered.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >rape of Beijing
      By me

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    is it nukular?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      no. but the bigger question is can it launch aircraft?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yes it is why would you lie? It’s already launched aircraft

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          it was a genuine question, there is no need to be so defensive. i didn't see it launch planes in the propaganda video o[p posted.

          do you just mean it has launched a plane while drydocked like an immobile airstrip? or has it actually launched a plane on this sea trial?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          for a nuclear aircraft carrier it sure seems to have a giant diesel smoke plume

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Implessive

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Chinamen really went far since the 90's

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I really wish you would make one decent thread for a change

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Implessive

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I for one, I'm really glad for the chinese, maybe now they'll get over their insecurities for being relentlessly bullied in the last couple centuries.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Now this is a story all about how my life got flip turned upside down.

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Most implessive

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why is the flight deck all spotted and mottled?
    Is the paint already peeling off?

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    thoughts on thoughts spam threads?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Implessive

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >NOOOO you can’t discuss China’s military
      Why not? Are we taking away from your war tourist threads?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >you can't discuss
        Neither can you or the OP.

        https://i.imgur.com/BzD02eI.jpeg

        The Chinese Navy just released footage of their Type 003 Fujian conducting Sea Trials in 4K60fps. Thoughts?: https://youtu.be/soEpAprko7w

        https://i.imgur.com/ndtfkLj.jpeg

        Nice top down view of the flight deck

        Just like every other thread.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        we're not paid by the thread like you wumao.

        It's implessive though, that the deck is already rotting. Nice tofu dreg carrier you have there.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You seethe for free over Sino superiority

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >sino superiority
            lmao, can't make a builiding properly.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous
      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        then why don't you discuss it instead of making these shitty low effort threads that you need to spam 5 of at a time?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          May I see the other 4 threads being spammed right now? I don’t see them…

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            chinese are something special
            is your face so thick because daddy america has slapped you so many times?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Chinks tend to have massive inferiority complex

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You seethe for free over Sino superiority

        Implessive

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Dude has been spamming these shit threads for years

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nice top down view of the flight deck

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      where is the fourth cat?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Cooked for dinner

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        everyone's already shat on it for not having a nuclear reactor, but what about the elevators? Nimitz class has 4, Ford has 3, the elevators of both look bigger than these. Wouldn't this limit the sortie rate even further?

        My guess would be they expect to launch their flankers in pairs and keep the third launcher for emergencies, AWACS, or deck planes. Perhaps trying to save weight by reducing elevators. That or maybe they just uncritically copied what we did with the Nimitz, removing even more elevators without understanding why we went from 4 to 3

        The Type 003 has 3 catapults and 2 elevators because that's what they're already used to with the two previous STOBAR Kutnetzov carriers which also had 3 take off positions and 2 elevators. It has nothing to do with the Nimitz or Forrestal class at all.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Since the Type 003 follows a similar layout of their previous STOBAR carriers but with EMALS catapults, this means that the crew and pilot training can be very similar and even simpler since taking off from CATOBAR is way easier than STOBAR and they have the hardest part, the deck landings, already under control.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      everyone's already shat on it for not having a nuclear reactor, but what about the elevators? Nimitz class has 4, Ford has 3, the elevators of both look bigger than these. Wouldn't this limit the sortie rate even further?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Probably. Not to mention it's going to be stocked full of a bunch of shitty soviet era copycat j15s that are heavier than shit making them even slower to launch.

        The Fujian is just a waste of money. I doubt they are even learning anything by building it.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        My guess would be they expect to launch their flankers in pairs and keep the third launcher for emergencies, AWACS, or deck planes. Perhaps trying to save weight by reducing elevators. That or maybe they just uncritically copied what we did with the Nimitz, removing even more elevators without understanding why we went from 4 to 3

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      wait a second. do those service vehicles have enclosed cabs?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      whats up with china name shit type- something something. Even their tanks is named that way.

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    China has surpassed Soviet Union as the premier anti-pole of the West and has vindicated Command & Conquer: Generals developers

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    maybe from laughing

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Be an awful shame if it burst into fire in multiple places on its shakedown cruise.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      So, anyway....

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Eagle Claw.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Just part of a proud tradition of ships named USS Bonhomme Richard catching fire.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >they're making fun of us
            >QUICK POST THE BON HOMME FIRE
            Kek. Chinks not learning lessons will always be funny.

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Implessive

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    About time we see taiwan to finally get united to the mainland

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Imprpyomang

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Ok, so where's the shock testing or the high-speed maneuverability testing? They lose the footage or something?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Does it even have high speed?
      Also I think the range is kind of shit since they're diesel powered not nuclear, have to be constantly refueled.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        range is limited by the strike group as a total. Not all ships are nuclear powered. The Ford might be able to go around the earth nearly 70 times before refueling but the dozens of warships around it are still conventionally powered. Plus you need to keep refueling your aircraft.

        China doesn't have the logistics the US has. They can't project power past the south china sea.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Does it even have high speed?
          Also I think the range is kind of shit since they're diesel powered not nuclear, have to be constantly refueled.

          the less time a carrier spends on unrep, the more it can haul ass around its escorts launching planes and evading ASBMs and shit

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >range is limited by the strike group as a total. Not all ships are nuclear powered
            While true, they also aren't floating city airport sized chunkers quite like a nuclear carrier. Big, some of them, but not as big.

            I'm going to be honest, I have no idea how the logistics of a carrier strike group works. There are like 8000 total crewmen among the different ships that you have to feed and keep communications with and refueling all the different frigates, destroyers, subs, and carriers and 70ish aircraft. I can only imagine how much fuel they burn through in a single day. And you would have to have escorts for your supply ships going to shore to get all that fuel and food and water and it's just fricking insane.

            America has experience doing this for like 100 years while China has absolutely zero experience. There's just no way their carriers are going to be used to project power. They are trying to build an entire fleet overnight and the whole thing is just going to be a huge clusterfrick.

            Also it amazes me that amazon can still do 2 day delivery to an aircraft carrier. Now that's some logistics.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >range is limited by the strike group as a total. Not all ships are nuclear powered
          While true, they also aren't floating city airport sized chunkers quite like a nuclear carrier. Big, some of them, but not as big.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        A Forrestal class CV had an 8000 mile range. But for some reason, you need more to control the East Pacific.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Those things had millions of gallons of fuel on board and would probably use 50,000 gallons of fuel a day. That shit is just absolutely insane.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      > /k/ is clueless about how ships are built, fitted out, trialled and accepted.

      If it's not a game mode, /k/ just doesn't know.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Doesn't elaborate
        >Doesn't explain
        >Implicit assertion that everyone, everywhere, does things in the same way
        Besides the fact that the other anon was implying that China probably doesn't have the experience to engineer around those problems, making you disingenuous from the start, you're just acting like a sperg.

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I think the music was pretty cringe considering it was just some panning shots of it floating along.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What's the last thing to come out of china that is not cringe?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        DJI drones with AESA radars: https://youtu.be/G8gjm2HALEM?si=VnunqXDOTEWXS2cJ

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    who's actually posting these chinese threads?

    trolls?
    chink shills?
    military enthusiasts?
    false-flaggers?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Two from each category, probably.

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    My thoughts are immense and expansive, I shall leave you with just one word to describe them, however.

    I M P L E S S I V E

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah they look the same because both were fires, but when some moronic Black person throws a cigarette at a pile of munitions in the US nobody feels the need to hide it.

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Are your PRC jailers going to sell your kidneys as a matching pair or do they get more for two single sales ?

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    how white am i

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Kuznezhov light

  36. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >carrier
    I don't see it carry anything... why it's empty?

  37. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Implessive

  38. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    can china spam conventional carriers faster than we can spam nuclear carriers? wasnt that a major factor in ww2?

  39. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    "I am the watcher on the walls. I am the shield that guards the realms of men."

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Closest thing to the Nights Watch would be the southron asiatics, Turks(immigration from MENA goes over them) or the Ukrainians.

  40. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >2024
    >building carriers
    did china get the memo that carriers are outdated now that it is the age of hypersonics?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Lol, use their propaganda against them, nice.
      ://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2023/06/france-conducts-first-vmax-hypersonic-glide-vehicle-test/

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      How many? two? ten?

      lmao.

      China launches 276 medium range ballistic missiles per year for validation training alone. That's more than you will ever be able to build. And with what materials? Chinese rare earth elements that your israelites still cant replace despite 10 years of telling us you want to do it? Cant find miners? Cant convince land-locked mongolia selling you some? Cant convince white westeners to ruin their lands to flush that shit out of the earth via acid? Sucks to be you.

      Ukraine is telling. You cant even produce primitive artillery shells in enough numbers. You will LARP as Imperial Japan while China will be the US arsenal of the free world this time around when we remake the Pacific War.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        276 missiles. Impressive.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >rare earth metals
        he doesn't know

  41. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    WWII autist here...

    it takes 20 years of trial and error to perfect carrier operation.

    Do you know how many moronic ideas USA has in the 1920s when we were getting this shit off the ground? USA is the only country that effectively used the carrier in the entire world, and the only other country that even came close was the Japanese and guess what? We told them to lock that shit away deep down.

    There is no way China is getting classified carrier operations intel from 100 years ago. That means China will have to take 20 years to learn that shit for themselves... Good Luck.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >20 years

      I wonder if the USA will still exist.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        If the world's largest economy is gone in 20 years the rest of the world would be fricked all the same.

        Third worlders are moronic.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          some men just want to watch the world burn

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        if the US doesn't exist in 20 years then that's the end of the world
        you do not understand the ripples

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      I'm going to be honest, I have no idea how the logistics of a carrier strike group works. There are like 8000 total crewmen among the different ships that you have to feed and keep communications with and refueling all the different frigates, destroyers, subs, and carriers and 70ish aircraft. I can only imagine how much fuel they burn through in a single day. And you would have to have escorts for your supply ships going to shore to get all that fuel and food and water and it's just fricking insane.

      America has experience doing this for like 100 years while China has absolutely zero experience. There's just no way their carriers are going to be used to project power. They are trying to build an entire fleet overnight and the whole thing is just going to be a huge clusterfrick.

      Also it amazes me that amazon can still do 2 day delivery to an aircraft carrier. Now that's some logistics.

      They already mastered STOBAR operations:

      Since the Type 003 follows a similar layout of their previous STOBAR carriers but with EMALS catapults, this means that the crew and pilot training can be very similar and even simpler since taking off from CATOBAR is way easier than STOBAR and they have the hardest part, the deck landings, already under control.

      Operating from CATOBAR carrier is going to be even easier, since It's like going from a manual transmission to automatic

  42. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Kinda like our new chinaman tourist, he is actually informed, if not a bit over the top tbh.

  43. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Fun read.
    https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2024/may/pla-navys-blue-team-center-games-war

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Service leaders know that, to be effective, games must accurately represent the behavior of the putative adversary—“Blue” in PLA parlance. >Since foreign militaries conceal their capabilities, plans, and doctrines, simulating Blue is no easy task.

      Wasn't there a quote about Americans and plans doctrines?

  44. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This is, by far, my favorite schizo. Shine on you crazy Moissanite!

  45. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    SAY HIS NAME
    IM. <*CLAP*> PLESS. <*CLAP*> IVE!

  46. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >the US shall fall!!!!
    Lol ok say goodbye to your economy
    https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/080615/china-owns-us-debt-how-much.asp

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      [...]

      At least be more subtle about this, Chang.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        What?? That's not my post??

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        What?? That's not my post??

        For clarity what I'm referring to is the trade part which says:
        >"the Chinese rely on American markets to buy Chinese-produced goods. Artificially suppressing the yuan has made it difficult for a growing Chinese middle class; so, exports are needed to keep businesses running.

        >Consider what the current arrangement means. The Chinese buy up dollar bills in the form of Treasurys. This helps inflate the value of the dollar. In return, American consumers get cheap Chinese products and incoming investment capital. The average American is made better off by foreigners providing inexpensive services and only demanding pieces of paper in return."

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *