Because acknowledging that a new CVRT is being developed as a stopgap replacement for the current CVRT in the recon roll is basically admission that the Ajax program is such a dead end that the British Army doesn't expect to get a new recon vehicle before the old units are kaput.
Well I like the fact they were prepared to do it. BAE is a shameless company TBQFH but the remedial action (rebuild ancient gear) isn't wrong. The fundamental problem is these are M113 equivalent AFVs. The modern version should be twice as heavy, twice as powerful, same crew numbers, integrated spall liner.
>Warriortards new angle after being bublasted in the CVRT thread
Lmao, you are so samn easy to watch samegay entire hreads with the same exact talking points
>Why isn't it being talked about?
The British arms industry (and country) is India tier nowadays so people could careless what some third-world shithole island is up to.
>The Brits recently showed off a modernized variant of the CVRT
It's a privately owned Stormer 30 prototype from 20-30 years ago.
Industry stuck an E-SPIRE sight in it (which is the current standard on Scimitar) and fitted some rubber bandtracks as one last hurrah to see if the MoD wanted it instead of the CVR(t) 235 upgrade, then it was sold to a collector
It looks really dumb
>Why isn't it being talked about?
nailed it.
Look how stupid it is.
Yu'er look duomb
Imagine modernizing your IFV and making it look worse in every conceivable way
Because acknowledging that a new CVRT is being developed as a stopgap replacement for the current CVRT in the recon roll is basically admission that the Ajax program is such a dead end that the British Army doesn't expect to get a new recon vehicle before the old units are kaput.
Well I like the fact they were prepared to do it. BAE is a shameless company TBQFH but the remedial action (rebuild ancient gear) isn't wrong. The fundamental problem is these are M113 equivalent AFVs. The modern version should be twice as heavy, twice as powerful, same crew numbers, integrated spall liner.
because it's bong procurement
they will get nothing after 15 years and end up buying US or German
Please tell me it has a better gun that doesn't work on 4-round clips?
>Warriortards new angle after being bublasted in the CVRT thread
Lmao, you are so samn easy to watch samegay entire hreads with the same exact talking points
what the frick is that
CVRT with add on armor and unmanned 40mm turret.
Got more info about it? Can barely find any details about the vic
That turret doesn't look unmanned at all.
Because it's redundant
>racing helmet
Are they trying to get mocked or what?
>helmet designed for highspeed crashes
>dumb to wear in a metal box moving at high speed
You seem like the kind of person who ate sand as a kid
Anon it's in testing and motorbike helmets are one of the cheapest safest things to use outside of being shot at, ie, in non combat trials.
Real
Because then they have to explain why they aren't donating any CVRT to Ukraine
>Brits
imagine tank races around the isle of man
>Why isn't it being talked about?
The British arms industry (and country) is India tier nowadays so people could careless what some third-world shithole island is up to.
Seethe
>india tier
not a bad ranking system for utterly shit things
>iran tier
>indian tier
>russian tank tier
>mexican tier
>The Brits recently showed off a modernized variant of the CVRT
It's a privately owned Stormer 30 prototype from 20-30 years ago.
Industry stuck an E-SPIRE sight in it (which is the current standard on Scimitar) and fitted some rubber bandtracks as one last hurrah to see if the MoD wanted it instead of the CVR(t) 235 upgrade, then it was sold to a collector
Why is the stig driving it?
frick why did they have to change the lights.