Just a reminder that the west and NATO would win a nuclear war against Russia. Only X percentage of Russian nukes actually work and are even somewhat capable. The Russians would still deal a crippling blow in a strategic exchange but the ensuing genocide would completely eradicate Russia from existence on all relevant levels. A century or two later as the coming generations rebuild they would live in a utopia with no Russian influence.
Do we even have enough nukes to irradiate the entirety of Russia? You can vaporize Moscow all you want but nothing stops them from waiting it out in some random corner of Siberia.
Anon even if I get hit directly, if even one rocket detonates inside it's silo (and I'm sure these weapons that will "never be used" all in a *great* state of repair) I can die laughing, and at the end of the day that's all I really want.
Honestly what is that segment on Tcuker Cuckerson?
I'm going to other sites to view the episode, investigate that girl. Is she a glowie shill to keep the OSINT hounds off the scent? I believed her >Greenies are fricking butthole money stealers
story because that's true.
There's a cultural meme in Russia that the British are essentially the israelites and control everything behind the scenes.
And to add to what the other anon said, the British fricking them up in the Crimean War made them feel like the perfidious Albion shot down their dream of being respected as an European empire.
Why are Russians more obsessed with nuking Britain than the USA lmao
The Russian dump big money in London as well, they're resentful about how good Britain is after centuries of fighting them around the globe.
The part about the British peerage being Illuminati types is true, though, britain is set up to steal Colonial money and keep it in the Western Alliance.
Also, BTW, why India hates the US by proxy, and why Indian immigration to the UK is a weapon, and aggressive.
Not a vatnik, the British should be sending 50 and properly supporting them, not this token gesture.
They don't really have 50 to give. The reason they are giving them is the all impossible moron filter political dimension: The most numerous type of tanks in the west are Abrams & Leo 2's. The US doesn't want to supply tanks as the feel that would be far to escalate things too much, and desire a European solutio. Numerous countries with Leo 2's want to provide them to Ukraine but can't without German permission (Germany is also very worried about escalating things as well, and really doesn't want to be in a leadership position). By providing tanks the UK is putting it's head above the parapet, crossing that line first and showing Germany that providing tanks to Ukraine isn't going to start WW3. The aim being that Germany will feel shamed, relent to pressure from other euro countries (including France somewhat oddly) and allow Leo 2's to be provided to Ukraine.
What the UK is doing is providing the leadership no one else is giving in the hope it will unlock the much more numerous, and easier to supply Leo 2's to he given in aid to Ukraine.
Ukraine is fully aware that the UK cannot give tanks in the numbers that will have any effect in the field but is highly appreciative of this move despite the large logistical burden for this very reason. A couple Challys now means much more significant amount of Leo 2's in a few weeks/months.
Before you counter that this won't work, it has worked numerous times in the last year. As an example the UK was first to supply significant amounts of weapons to Ukraine after the invasion, and first western nation to allow it's citizens to volunteer. Both measures being followed quickly by Eastern/Baltic/Scandi and more slowly by Germany
>The Bong Bus is coming to Ukraine
was the first to arrive
>What the UK is doing is providing the leadership no one else is giving >it has worked numerous times in the last year. As an example the UK was first to supply significant amounts of weapons to Ukraine after the invasion, and first western nation to allow it's citizens to volunteer. Both measures being followed quickly by Eastern/Baltic/Scandi and more slowly by Germany
based
why do I hear the Grenadier March playing in the background all of a sudden
Daily reminder that the Krakhiv offensive only used 17 shitty T-series tanks and that was enough to BTFO of Vatniks for thousands of square km. Imagine what they can do with 14 Challangers and 100 Bradley’s/Marders
Aren't NATO tanks made for a hugely different, defensive doctrine? They have large lower glacis plates meant to be hidden by hulldown positioning. Won't that be a liability trying to maneuver in Ukraine's open, largely flat ground? I mean the Challenger 2 stores ammo right in front, next to the driver doesn't it?
bong bus sounds like something that carries hippies from 1960s
They wont. You cant visually confim a challenger tank as Russian losses on Twitter. Okay maybe you can, its muttBlack folk following them after all.
Why doesn't Russia do a visually confirmed Ukie tank losses list? If they wont do it, it seems they are scared.
>Why doesn't Russia do a visually confirmed Ukie tank losses list?
Russia can't even do their military communications through an encrypted channel
Oryx maintains a Ukie list too
Unless Russians do their own "correct" list, they agree with the list of Oryx
They've been doing it since 2014 tourist.
https://lostarmour.info/armour
>Every fourth one is ukrainian
>the rest are all labeled “mystery”
>lmfao Russians are such fricking idiots. Can’t even propaganda right
Inconvenient to see Okrainian casualties, huh?
I literally don’t give a crap about ukes. Just want as many Russians to die as possible good night
All aboard choo choo
Why do western tanks look so much cooler then rusmutts trash?
It’s the knowledge that they work that gives them the mystique
Just cool m8
That novichok caper isn't so funny now, is it Ivan?
Do you want nuclear war? This is how you get the nuclear war.
IM GONNA NOOOK
Yes.
Stfu moron
Bring it on Ivan.
Pootin has been saying that for over a decade, but clearly his nuke threats are as empty as his tanks' ERA modules
>Do you want nuclear war?
Where do you think you are?
What the absolute frick am i watching
>Do you want nuclear war?
Desperately so.
>Do you want nuclear war
Yes
>This is how you get one
Lmao I wish moron
>Do you want nuclear war?
Absolutely. The only solution for the cancer that is Russia is aggressive radiation therapy.
Just a reminder that the west and NATO would win a nuclear war against Russia. Only X percentage of Russian nukes actually work and are even somewhat capable. The Russians would still deal a crippling blow in a strategic exchange but the ensuing genocide would completely eradicate Russia from existence on all relevant levels. A century or two later as the coming generations rebuild they would live in a utopia with no Russian influence.
Do we even have enough nukes to irradiate the entirety of Russia? You can vaporize Moscow all you want but nothing stops them from waiting it out in some random corner of Siberia.
Anon even if I get hit directly, if even one rocket detonates inside it's silo (and I'm sure these weapons that will "never be used" all in a *great* state of repair) I can die laughing, and at the end of the day that's all I really want.
I will die rubbing one out like that guy in Pompeii knowing Russia’s finally a been eliminated
Tards on this site don't know why whales are washing up on shore in New Jersey.
There's a desperate panic to find ballistic missile subs.
Shouldn't be too hard to find. The radiation signature given off when they inevitably reenact the Kursk will give them away.
Honestly what is that segment on Tcuker Cuckerson?
I'm going to other sites to view the episode, investigate that girl. Is she a glowie shill to keep the OSINT hounds off the scent? I believed her
>Greenies are fricking butthole money stealers
story because that's true.
But are they pinging a Red November?
Yeah
>he thinks the west hasn't had subs parked off russia's coast for the last year ready to blast moscow into radioactive dust
Lucky sevens confirm
Is this question directed at russia or the uk? Cos it works both ways
Every day I pray for nuclear war.
Your words are as empty as your soul.
Why are Russians more obsessed with nuking Britain than the USA lmao
Presumably still seething over Crimea
Meanwhile the average bong is barely aware that it happened
The recognition of perfidious Albion is a universal thing.
There's a cultural meme in Russia that the British are essentially the israelites and control everything behind the scenes.
And to add to what the other anon said, the British fricking them up in the Crimean War made them feel like the perfidious Albion shot down their dream of being respected as an European empire.
The Russian dump big money in London as well, they're resentful about how good Britain is after centuries of fighting them around the globe.
The part about the British peerage being Illuminati types is true, though, britain is set up to steal Colonial money and keep it in the Western Alliance.
Also, BTW, why India hates the US by proxy, and why Indian immigration to the UK is a weapon, and aggressive.
Russia could nuke London and not one Englishman would die.
England wants to get nuked it seems.
What do you think would happen if they did that?
Change the fricking record mate
severely underrated
Honestly what's the point? 12 tanks isn't enough to do anything and the bongs won't even set up a repair depot to support them.
Honestly your a moron and the bongs won't even set up a learning facility to educate you
If all these weapons won’t do anything then would you vatnik morons shut the frick up about them already?
Not a vatnik, the British should be sending 50 and properly supporting them, not this token gesture.
Agreed then
They don't really have 50 to give. The reason they are giving them is the all impossible moron filter political dimension: The most numerous type of tanks in the west are Abrams & Leo 2's. The US doesn't want to supply tanks as the feel that would be far to escalate things too much, and desire a European solutio. Numerous countries with Leo 2's want to provide them to Ukraine but can't without German permission (Germany is also very worried about escalating things as well, and really doesn't want to be in a leadership position). By providing tanks the UK is putting it's head above the parapet, crossing that line first and showing Germany that providing tanks to Ukraine isn't going to start WW3. The aim being that Germany will feel shamed, relent to pressure from other euro countries (including France somewhat oddly) and allow Leo 2's to be provided to Ukraine.
What the UK is doing is providing the leadership no one else is giving in the hope it will unlock the much more numerous, and easier to supply Leo 2's to he given in aid to Ukraine.
Ukraine is fully aware that the UK cannot give tanks in the numbers that will have any effect in the field but is highly appreciative of this move despite the large logistical burden for this very reason. A couple Challys now means much more significant amount of Leo 2's in a few weeks/months.
Before you counter that this won't work, it has worked numerous times in the last year. As an example the UK was first to supply significant amounts of weapons to Ukraine after the invasion, and first western nation to allow it's citizens to volunteer. Both measures being followed quickly by Eastern/Baltic/Scandi and more slowly by Germany
>The Bong Bus is coming to Ukraine
was the first to arrive
>What the UK is doing is providing the leadership no one else is giving
>it has worked numerous times in the last year. As an example the UK was first to supply significant amounts of weapons to Ukraine after the invasion, and first western nation to allow it's citizens to volunteer. Both measures being followed quickly by Eastern/Baltic/Scandi and more slowly by Germany
based
why do I hear the Grenadier March playing in the background all of a sudden
Daily reminder that the Krakhiv offensive only used 17 shitty T-series tanks and that was enough to BTFO of Vatniks for thousands of square km. Imagine what they can do with 14 Challangers and 100 Bradley’s/Marders
>CAM ON RISHER, SEND THA FACKEN 'ELICOPTAS AND SUM TANKS TOO
Will the French send any tanks? That would also put pressure on Germany.
Aren't NATO tanks made for a hugely different, defensive doctrine? They have large lower glacis plates meant to be hidden by hulldown positioning. Won't that be a liability trying to maneuver in Ukraine's open, largely flat ground? I mean the Challenger 2 stores ammo right in front, next to the driver doesn't it?