the army released a preliminary report on how to counter uas/uav

the army released a preliminary report on how to counter uas/uav
https://irp.fas.org/doddir/army/atp3-01-81.pdf

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I say put the Quad 50 on a hummer with modernized targeting equipment

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >This page intentionally left blank
    This is painfully dumb.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Retard doesn't know doc standards

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >you’re supposed to do it so it’s not dumb
        No, it’s still fucking stupid.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Well it wasn't left blank if they wrote that it was left blank on it, was it? Checkmate, atheists

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        And if it wasnt there youd be bitching about them "fucking up" the document. Its okay, you dont have to like it.

        >it's another manual laborer doesn't know publishing standards episode

        [...]
        It's more of a last-ditch option like a knife.

        It's a complete lack of creativity. You could put a typical or ideal use case scenario illustration in there. You could space out your previous material to use that page. No I don't know publishing standards, but this one is fucking stupid.

        If you see it coming and it’s in range, sure. But out of the hundreds of videos of frags being dropped by drones in ukraine, almost nobody ever sees it coming. You can’t hear a drone 400 feet above you.

        Ultimately, this. A full choke 10 gauge with Bubba's pissing hot turkey load isn't going to be enough even in most cases.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          If we didn't know that the page was intentionally left blank we might spend hours, days even, trying to figure out what information we're missing. The chaos would be unimaginable.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >You could put a typical or ideal use case scenario illustration in there
          or you could use that space on the receiving end to write notes in. Its a pointless argument and most books have a blank page within a pages of the front cover. Unless you’ve never read a book then your argument would make sense

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I’ll admit I have no idea what the fly page is for, but writing “intentionally left blank” is the equivalent of saying “we wrote on this page to tell you that we’re not writing on the page.” Why not just fucking leave it blank?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              because then people might think they had a misprint or something and that there was supposed to be something there
              if there's a long established practice of doing something that doesn't make sense to you, your first reaction really shouldn't be "because people other than me are dumb"

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                > because then people might think
                who cares what people might think? If a fly page is supposed to be blank, leave it blank.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                no

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                A lot of intentional blanks occur between chapters or sections, genius. This occurs a lot in technical publications, which are prone to receiving periodic updates. They also tend to be in loose leaf format, to facilitate the updating process. If you ever get a real job, you’ll encounter the phenomenon.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                This doesn’t explain why the fly page says “lol I didn’t write on it” you fucking queer. Imagine clearing paper jams in an office for a living and thinking you’re hot shit.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You should probably learn what a flyleaf is before you go sperging all over the internet, Corky. The page in the manual that was left blank isn’t a flyleaf. That page was left blank so that the preface and table of contents can be updated without affecting the following section, which is the introduction.

                Now, dipshit, you’ve been spoon fed. Go be a moron somewhere else

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >agghhhh, MOM, my friends on PrepHole aren't impressed by the fact that I work as an unpaid intern in an office building!

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Is you name Lumiere? You’re projecting like a motherfucker. You must be a real blast at parties

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You are unironically fucking retarded

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I think you have struck a nerve

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Okay, hear me out:
                Why not just put "NOTES" or something at the top or bottom of the page?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      And if it wasnt there youd be bitching about them "fucking up" the document. Its okay, you dont have to like it.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >it's another manual laborer doesn't know publishing standards episode

      Shotgun is actually good against drones? Awesome.

      It's more of a last-ditch option like a knife.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        How about a Tesla tower that arcs electricity at them?

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Shotgun is actually good against drones? Awesome.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      If you see it coming and it’s in range, sure. But out of the hundreds of videos of frags being dropped by drones in ukraine, almost nobody ever sees it coming. You can’t hear a drone 400 feet above you.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      shotguns were used against carrier pigeons in WW1
      I'm not sure how they would hold up against drones as a lot of the footage released shows the drones quite high up

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Ukraine needs some DU shotshells (I'm hoping this all surpluses afterwards)

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Bird shells generally have an effective range of 50m. The issues is drones vary in size and speed and are difficult to track and therefore aim unlike clays and birds

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Wouldn’t an adjustable timer/altimeter EMP be best? If you could assemble one and put it into an empty flare gun cartridge you’d have a fairly practical fuckoff solution, providing you keep your eyes on the sky.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      How the fuck are you going to generate an EMP strong enough to knock out a drone and have it be portable and widespread
      You can’t just majick words into existence and act like it’s an obvious solution to an existing problem

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        He's probably thinking of an explosively-driven flux compression generator but you're correct to assume it wouldn't have a range big enough to matter.

        A backpack sized HPM might work.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          doesn't hpm require ground stations and constant power?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        maybe they will carry neutron stars around

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      stop saying EMP the same way you say Hacked. you dont know what youre talking about.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Field- expedient countermeasures, such as constructing snow walls, also provide a means of defeating ultraviolet sensors
    Army approved snow forts, I love it

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Reformers keep winning

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >we will see the rise of skeet shooting as a military skill

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *