T-14 Armata has been exported with UA war markings, likely going to the war.

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm sure it will never see Frontline combat
    They don't have alot of these lying around

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They're using one of their Su-57s, so why not 4 of their T-14s.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Because only 3 works

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          those are some big numbers you got a source for that

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Which one will they use? The one that l moves, the one that shoots or the one that doesn't do either?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >They're using
        >launch long-range antiaircraft rockets from Russian territory

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Zero chance for Su-57 to get captured if it is used only as a R-37 platform lobbing missiles from the Russian side of border, also near-zero chance of getting shot down. But a MBT? Use one in a real combat situation and there is always a very real risk for anything to happen to it.

        Would matter less if Russia actually had more of them, but as long as Armatas are limited to an amount countable with one hand, the value they add to Russian combat capabilities is close to zero, while losing one would be a big propaganda hit. Again, the latter could be just shrugged off if there were enough of Armatas to make a difference, but we all know that there isn’t.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          This. It simply doesn’t make sense to send parade queen shit to frontlines, more risk than rewards.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            they're going to pony it around, get it a lil dirty in the russian backcountry, add some "battle damage" and voila, t14 is totally combat proven wunderpazer

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Might be wise though. Combat tested is the best. See how it fails and fix it right in time before mass producing T-15. But knowing Russian hubris, they'll stamp 10k T-14 storage decorations that'll disintegrate on contact with next NLAW gen or something.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Also imagine the backlash if it gets destroyed or captured.
      I imagine they'll film it firing at something in the distance in a ballistic arc and call it a day

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Uhm didn't you know that the T-14 is cutting edge late 90s technology that can destroy 50 zillion T-72s? Ukraine is doomed, so are we. I, John of Idaho Oblast, say we cut our losses and don't supply ukraine anymore.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The best we probably gonna see is some russian drone footage of a T-14 shooting at nothing in some unknown forrest.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      > Forrest
      Pole spotted

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Forrest Gump is a Vietnam war hero

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Or shooting down rubble in mariupol.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >implying it would actually be filmed in Ukraine

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Looks like you were right, Anon.

      https://twitter.com/warmonitors/status/1623764030992130049

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    poccnr is also deploying the unicorn brigade and the Squonk units.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I hope a Leopard 1 knocks it out.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Are they sending the one that moves or the one that shoot ?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >THE TWO TANKS GET CONNECTED
      >THE ONE THAT CAN MOVE GOES IN THE FRONT
      >IT PULLS THE TANK THAT CAN SHOOT

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        ffs forgot the picture

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/Hh6N9Dj.jpg

        ffs forgot the picture

        THE FIRST TANK WILL HAVE A WORKING GUN. THE SECOND TANK WILL HAVE A WORKING ENGINE. WHEN THE FIRST TANK IS DESTOYED IT WILL TOSS IT TURRET. THE SECOND TANK WILL TAKE IT'S GUN!

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I kek'd at the thought of a bunch of turretless T-14s frantically circling around another T-14, trying to catch its tossed turret and going:
          >MINE! MINE!
          >MINE!
          >MINE! MINE! MINE! MINE!
          >MINE! MINE!
          >MINE! *click* *BOOOM* (it was an actual mine)
          >MINE!
          >MINE! MINE! MINE! MINE!

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          10/10

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/Hh6N9Dj.jpg

        ffs forgot the picture

        [...]
        THE FIRST TANK WILL HAVE A WORKING GUN. THE SECOND TANK WILL HAVE A WORKING ENGINE. WHEN THE FIRST TANK IS DESTOYED IT WILL TOSS IT TURRET. THE SECOND TANK WILL TAKE IT'S GUN!

        >I'll drive, You Shoot!
        I can't believe they already made a movie based on this, starring Megan Fox. I guess Russia's war style can be accurately described as, BAYHEM!

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >>THE TWO TANKS GET CONNECTED
        >>THE ONE THAT CAN MOVE GOES IN THE FRONT
        >>IT PULLS THE TANK THAT CAN SHOOT
        its real

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >they STILL haven't fixed the recoil wobbling

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What recoil wobbling?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        https://twitter.com/warmonitors/status/1623764030992130049

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          What wobble? Immediately after the shot, the barrel goes into horizontal position to commence the autoloading procedure. T-64/72/80 do the same thing.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous
            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Someone make the gif

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            https://i.imgur.com/qMbA3uC.jpg

            Why are the crew drawn like they're piloting some scifi super tank or something? Fricking oxygen masks seriously?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Wait a minute, the armata still has the circular autoloader under the turret?

            Then why the frick does it have that large rear section of the turret? To store loot?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Counterweight for the gun since the rest of the turret is tiny.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Its all a ruse, there is no seperate crew compartment. Russki have continued the soviet super soldier program to make combat midgets to fit inside the turret

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              storage space for repair tools according to random russki infographics. too small for loot, washing machines wont fit there

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/wkivyPd.jpg

                Wait a minute, the armata still has the circular autoloader under the turret?

                Then why the frick does it have that large rear section of the turret? To store loot?

                It´s sad how gimped are their design bureaus because of corruption, I´m not even going into how without the crew more compact and simpler autoloaders can be used but I bet that shit doesnt even have blowout panels

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            https://i.imgur.com/qMbA3uC.jpg

            Wait so what it is? Does the T14 have the T64 style autoloader or that weird 2 storey T72 style and if thats the case how the frick it even works?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            So... if that thing gets hit the turret will still fly up in the air... right?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You can literally hear the autoloadr working at the end of the video.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Genuinely moronic.
          This is the gun going to it's loading detent

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          90 IQ

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Unlikely to be in Ukraine. That account is a full blown Russian desinformation / shill account. They’ve tried to pass videos of as being in Ukraine before.

          Highly likely that we will see drone footage of a t 14 firing and then being cut to a leopard tank being disabled by an atgm/mine. Anything to attempt to reanimate the Russian MIC

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >That account is a full blown Russian desinformation / shill account.
            just cheap wonderwaffen bullshit then

            >T-14 Armata has been exported with UA war markings, likely going to the war.
            There have never been more than seven of these working, currently three. It is a dead project officially in Russia. If this relatively useless prototype(no parts or maintenance logistics destruction derby and done) is going to Ukraine all it says is Russia is critically short of running mbts which we knew already

            scratch this even just vatBlack person spam of this worthless non weapon

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >wobbling
      the porpoise strikes again

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >then change your fricking tank!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What recoil wobbling?

      >wobbling
      the porpoise strikes again

      https://twitter.com/warmonitors/status/1623764030992130049

      That could just be a bit of orbital wobble.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    https://twitter.com/warmonitors/status/1630937083547140096?s=46&t=JBgZ2cmFnQXFHkPkxZm-sg
    Full video. I finally found the source. (I'm OP)

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >like 10 of them
      damn i didnt expect this

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Because /k/ said it didn't enter service?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Allah willing, the first one eats a Panzerfaust and disintegrates for shitposting reasons.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >german extendo-wiener
        never fails to make me giggle

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Preferably an OG WW2 one some grandpa had stashed in the barn after the war.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Wait, did they retool these for a different engine or are they going to YOLO all ten of them on the A-85-3? Because if it's the latter, I kind of wonder if they have enough spare engines.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >like 10 of them
      damn i didnt expect this

      10 of them on video and around 20 were build, I have also seen Bumerang in similar setup. I guess they are at level of Germany in 1945 where they were putting even prototypes into frontline

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        If you're correct, then this is going to be like the whole "German Tiger electrical shortout, entire tank is a write-off" thing from WWII, only worse.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          best bet they are going to use them like Terminators, small numbers in limited operations.

          We have seen Terminators on beginning of the war and for half of the hear there was nothing but silence. I guess it's going to be the same but in the end it will explode on mine.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            If you're correct, then this is going to be like the whole "German Tiger electrical shortout, entire tank is a write-off" thing from WWII, only worse.

            not saying that they will field tank that will need specialized parts, in logistical nightmare.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              nothing because they simply wont deploy them, just like bumerangs spotted on a train earlier. its for yearly victory parade prep or photo ops on testing grounds

              That's definitely the most logical takeaway. So if we actually DO see these briefly on the frontline someplace, I'd say it's clear evidence that the RF has hit the "just grab whatever you can" phase of terminal desperation.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >I guess it's going to be the same but in the end it will explode on mine.
            You're probably right, but I'd give even odds that more than one of them blows the engine after the crew has to open up the throttle in combat conditions. I just hope we get to see one clear video of a Jav testing out Malakhit ERA, damn.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Would be funnier if a mango goes through it. It'd be unlikely that corruption got *that* bad but boy do they keep trying to lower that bar.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Don't underestimate a mango, Anon.
                Those things are dangerous.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I like how they've decided to censor the train and not the buildings, as if that is how people are geo-locating where these things have come from.
      They also did it for a random lamp post at the end, because why not?

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Theyre propably gonna ship it to front and then ship it back to safety like they did with that mi26

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Zisters, we still got some left for the Victory Day Parade right!?

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Does its engine work now?

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm starting to really look forward to the "victory day" parade this year..!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >May 9th
      >Two months to make it even more underwhelming than the last one

      If you were a betting man, Anon, what would you say the odds were of a bicycle brigade taking centre stage this year?

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The fabled sneedmarta...
    Are the gloves coming off at last?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Cringe anon

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So what will get the first confirmed armata kill?
    1 - mines
    2 - Javelin
    3 - artillery
    4 - Stugna
    5 - RPG/AT4/Matador
    6 - drone
    7 - western tank
    8 - eastern tank
    9 - abandooned
    0 - GLSDB
    dubs - that one ukie in the trench video

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Very likely mines, if it really gets to roll that is.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I hope it's a Leopard 1 with a Balkenkreuz painted onto its side.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      First it will break down several times before even coming anywhere close to the fighting, then it will be abandooooned

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      For me, it is:
      >88 - Azov dude with a Panzerfaust

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What i wonder is how high the turrets are going to fly on the Armatar, its turret is lighter than the T-72 and at the same time the ammo is packed closer and is in a smaller confined space. That got to add at least another 10m or so.

    • 1 year ago
      VicelvNOR

      Bradley with a TOW missile

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Azov tankist with a leopard1A5
      Absolutely hilarious

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Put me down for "13 - The A-85-3 engine burns out before it can reach the front; crew forced to abandon."
      Seriously, this thing can't upshift in a May Victory Day parade without needing repairs. And the V-92S2F won't fit in the chassis because they designed the tank around the engine.
      I cannot believe that there will be footage of these anywhere near the frontline for anything other than posed propaganda photos.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Nah I am going for
        "Abandoned in favor of any other Tank"
        why?
        because of picrel

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      hopefully it will be an ukie with a komar or some other small launcher

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      nothing because they simply wont deploy them, just like bumerangs spotted on a train earlier. its for yearly victory parade prep or photo ops on testing grounds

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      TOW from a Bradley.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      84mm Carl gustav
      or some Azov guys who somehow found a Flak88 in their grandpa's barn and restored it to working order.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Are there any in Ukraine? I was literally just thinking about them

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Carl Gustavs are in Ukraine
          and was even responsible for the First T-90M kill

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >and was even responsible for the First T-90M kill

            No it wasn't. Stop spreading Fuddlore. The T-90M was immobilized and taken out by a sister tank.

            There are Gustafs in Ukraine tho.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          a few, i think there's a video from some time ago of a T-90 getting whacked and people saying it was a CG

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If they actually deploy them in the near term I hope a javelin for the seething. In the far term an Abrams for the same reason.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Abandoned just like the fabled Terminator BMP that got knocked out

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      mud

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >9 - abandooned
      That would be the greatest thing

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      8

      It'll be a 60 year old T-64

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      ABANDOOON

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Rolling for the great and powerful abandooner

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Roll

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        check'd. What do trips get? Stolen by Australians? There's about the same number of T14s as there were A7Vs

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          High metal prices :DDDDDDDDDDDD

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Stolen by gypsies/random farmer.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Polish PT-91, resulting in Poles cancelling all tank orders and producing more T-72s because they can easily destroy the best Russian tank.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Most likely artillery, that has gotten the most tank kills this war

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Mulched by autocannon because the turret has >30mm of protection

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Going for the good old abandooners here.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You got a 7.But the most likely outcome is it never going to Ukraine.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Mines will get the first, but good odds it won't be confirmed. If it's anything other than a Stugna, we won't get video, just drone footage and a claim for what took it out.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      My money is on a Carl Gustav like the t90m got killed by, for extra humiliation factor

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Blue on blue from another T-14.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Rolling

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      rolling for abandoon!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Rolling rolling rolling

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Good, I was tired of waiting for them to be blown up too.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    new cammies

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    there are thousands of civ cars in russia with "UA war markings", do you think any of them are going to the war?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Given how the war is going atleast some of them probably will

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The Russian military should just start "appropriating" Z blazened cars imo.
      I'm sure the patriots wont mind.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    they are dragging around that piece of shit mock-up, like they drag the corpse of that TB-2, aren't they?

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Again? how many more weeks until the Train arrives on the front line?

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It will just be blown up and left to rust in a matter of weeks.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Any day now.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Are you sure it’s not getting sent back home for repairs?

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Meh. 🙂

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    they wont deploy one to the frontline
    they have so little of them, material wise losing one is whatever for russia, but if one is destroyed and spammed on mass media the political damage it would cause would be catastrophic

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >we will see the T-14 Cuckmata getting BTFO by a Bradley very soon

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Gunner, Missile, tank! Traverse right.

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >supposed top of the line wunderwaffe
    >still has the shitty hand painted "Z"s
    Do vatniks not understand stencils? Why is this so hard for them?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      There actually were Russian machines with more neat and tidy markings in the early stage of the war but they were quickly mulched and the handpainted markings have mostly been the norm ever since.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Bro they haven't even figured out to use a spray bottle and a cardboard mask. They are dumber than teenagers.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      He looks so sad

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Man this is just weird to me, is this just weak barrel lockup and/or lack of thickness in the receiver/barrel?

      They way it's oscillating like that is fricking wild and a massive engineering oversight.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Its a very light and compact cannon for its class which offers no advantage whatsoever on the ground vehicles who use it, who knows maybe the original draft was for an airborne cannon but it ended on ground service, if the russians decided a few years later to change the action to long recoil and affix the thin barrel to the 100mm cannon on the BMP3 it would suggest that they realized early in its service life that it wobbled too much. Why the havent used that frickhuge sleeve on the terminator to add some structural support and fix the barrels like on the BTR4 who knows

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Its a very light and compact cannon
          Are they really this fricking moronic, I know the past year should have really shown that, but this is a fricking APC/IFV. Maybe you're right about the airborne cannon origination aspect.
          Would explain the weight reduction.

          > Why the havent used that frickhuge sleeve on the terminator to add some structural support and fix the barrels like on the BTR4 who knows

          THIS IS WHAT CONFUSES ME.
          Look how JUICY that b***h is and they put like a tikka t3 light barrel setup in there.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Its a very light and compact cannon for its class which offers no advantage whatsoever on the ground vehicles who use it, who knows maybe the original draft was for an airborne cannon but it ended on ground service, if the russians decided a few years later to change the action to long recoil and affix the thin barrel to the 100mm cannon on the BMP3 it would suggest that they realized early in its service life that it wobbled too much. Why the havent used that frickhuge sleeve on the terminator to add some structural support and fix the barrels like on the BTR4 who knows

            some anon noted that the muzzle breaks blast into each other and cause the wobbles

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Not really, it was ogre from the start

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              This

              Not really, it was ogre from the start

              It's just made to:

              ?t=37

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Its a very light and compact cannon
              Are they really this fricking moronic, I know the past year should have really shown that, but this is a fricking APC/IFV. Maybe you're right about the airborne cannon origination aspect.
              Would explain the weight reduction.

              > Why the havent used that frickhuge sleeve on the terminator to add some structural support and fix the barrels like on the BTR4 who knows

              THIS IS WHAT CONFUSES ME.
              Look how JUICY that b***h is and they put like a tikka t3 light barrel setup in there.

              Thinking some more about this maybe the problem lies on the intended use vs the inept crews. I mean, on early videos of the invasion both the professional russian crews (rip) and in the case of ukrainians up until now are seen using either manual single shots or the slow rate firing setting. Maybe the problem is inexperienced crews using a fire mode only intended by the designers as some sort of desperate point blank measure or even to fill the dubious anti-helicopter capabilities were the insane spread would be an advantage

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    WHAT'S THAT?
    I CAN'T HEAR YOU OVER THE SOUND OF THE ENGINE!

    ?t=24

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Nafo has superior technology to automate shitposting whilst Russia employs pajeets
    Winning

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I think you have misidentified the target

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    It's always funny that /misc/troons of all ""people"" accuse any other board to be overrun with bots.

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    t14 needs to be battle tested but everyone understands with current moronic commanders they all will be destroyed and abandoned

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >they all will be destroyed and abandoned
      but in the opposite order

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >T-14 Armata has been exported with UA war markings, likely going to the war.
    There have never been more than seven of these working, currently three. It is a dead project officially in Russia. If this relatively useless prototype(no parts or maintenance logistics destruction derby and done) is going to Ukraine all it says is Russia is critically short of running mbts which we knew already

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    when will we see video of it shooting trees?

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    gimi

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    why can't the us give them any actual good tanks? jesus

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine the cataclysmic chimpout when one get's disabled and sent to the US by the Ukies.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The Ukies should parade it outside of every russian embassy in Europe first.

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    We're two months from the Victory Day parade, they're probably being moved and dolled up for that.
    I'll be shocked if they risk it's supposed future export prospects by sending it to be destroyed in war, even if it turns out to not be a screaming pile of junk, no weapon is invincible.
    "Z" markings for the parade is new but not surprising.

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    so uh what do they do when the autoloader malfunctions? when not if, because it's russia

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How are these likely to fare head on against soviet tanks?

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Will never see the front. Won't provide any advantage and will simply become javelin food if it did, and a huge propaganda loss for Russia.

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    more armata vatBlack persony bullshit

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *