I'm not sure about reliability, but for feel and fun tho hammer w/ a good decocker. They're more fun to play with and the single action trigger on some guns mogs any striker gun out there.
I like the extra safety features of a hammer fired gun, but I have the time/money to learn the DA pull. I would choose striker fired for a police department/military.
Until you have several manufactures decide to make near identical models with the only difference being striker/hammer (and then we go into SA/DA debates), there will never be a definitive answer. Since this is a subjective question, the only way to answer the question is also at an individual level. Find the pros/cons and select the best for your use case.
why has everyone decided that striker pistols aren't allowed to have manual safeties and must have garbage triggers as a result? in b4 >muh finger is the only safety I need
no it isn't you gay let's see you carry a revolver with the hammer cocked and find out how long your balls stay intact
Walther's striker triggers are breddy gud right out of the box. I haven't tried the normal P320 trigger but the one on my custom works FCU is good too (not as good as the Walther IMO)
The trigger break isn't related to the lack of a manual safety safety, but you could say the inclusion of a longer takeup is. Takeup however doesn't contribute to or detract from trigger quality, it's more due to slop or mechanism type. I think what you are saying is, because a striker hook (which acts like the notch on a hammer) is in the slide and the sear is in the frame, most of the time engineers add more overlap (and thus more creep) between them to account for tolerance stacking than you would require from a sear and hammer being pinned in the same piece of metal (i.e. the frame of a 1911). Aftermarket sears and triggers like Apex undo some of this overlap among other things.
I think you may also be conflating partially precharged strikers like glox with fully precharged strikers like the P10C and PDP.
I don't really have a counter-point, just pointing this out I guess.
Source: there are strikers with EXCELLENT triggers, irrespective of takeup or trigger/blade safeties, but they are all fully charged mechanisms.
yeah the ppq trigger is nice because it's designed like a bolt action trigger, but with way more takeup than it needs. consider that bolt actions are all striker fired and even a shitty factory adjusted one is better than the best striker fired handgun trigger because no one tricked people into thinking that having to take the safety off will make them lose their durr.
my dick
They're both rad dude
What are those two handguns?
A Hudson H9 and a FK Brno PSD frend
chad tripfag
i just throw bullets, way cheaper and reliable
I'm not sure about reliability, but for feel and fun tho hammer w/ a good decocker. They're more fun to play with and the single action trigger on some guns mogs any striker gun out there.
i own both and like both
>
Whichever one you shoot best with but in a end of world scenario go with the striker fired.
to be fair, in the end of the world scenario, i hope OP has a rifle instead
Striker fire, had a piece of cotton render my hammer fired gun useless.
This sounds retarded, story?
It happened in his imagination so the story doesn't really matter.
Wood fired, hands down.
I like the extra safety features of a hammer fired gun, but I have the time/money to learn the DA pull. I would choose striker fired for a police department/military.
It's hammer time!
Until you have several manufactures decide to make near identical models with the only difference being striker/hammer (and then we go into SA/DA debates), there will never be a definitive answer. Since this is a subjective question, the only way to answer the question is also at an individual level. Find the pros/cons and select the best for your use case.
why has everyone decided that striker pistols aren't allowed to have manual safeties and must have garbage triggers as a result? in b4
>muh finger is the only safety I need
no it isn't you gay let's see you carry a revolver with the hammer cocked and find out how long your balls stay intact
Garbage trigger is better than manual safety because garbage trigger goes bang.
Walther's striker triggers are breddy gud right out of the box. I haven't tried the normal P320 trigger but the one on my custom works FCU is good too (not as good as the Walther IMO)
The trigger break isn't related to the lack of a manual safety safety, but you could say the inclusion of a longer takeup is. Takeup however doesn't contribute to or detract from trigger quality, it's more due to slop or mechanism type. I think what you are saying is, because a striker hook (which acts like the notch on a hammer) is in the slide and the sear is in the frame, most of the time engineers add more overlap (and thus more creep) between them to account for tolerance stacking than you would require from a sear and hammer being pinned in the same piece of metal (i.e. the frame of a 1911). Aftermarket sears and triggers like Apex undo some of this overlap among other things.
I think you may also be conflating partially precharged strikers like glox with fully precharged strikers like the P10C and PDP.
I don't really have a counter-point, just pointing this out I guess.
Source: there are strikers with EXCELLENT triggers, irrespective of takeup or trigger/blade safeties, but they are all fully charged mechanisms.
i have that gun and i prefer my PPQ M1's trigger
Canik and Walther have insanely good triggers stock. P320 and 365 also have a great triggers.
yeah the ppq trigger is nice because it's designed like a bolt action trigger, but with way more takeup than it needs. consider that bolt actions are all striker fired and even a shitty factory adjusted one is better than the best striker fired handgun trigger because no one tricked people into thinking that having to take the safety off will make them lose their durr.