>stops. >raises TOW eyebrow. >drives. >lowers TOW eyebrow

>stops
>raises TOW eyebrow
>drives
>lowers TOW eyebrow

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    is this some armatard crap?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Pls take your meds

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Isn't the TOW kinda old for a ATGM

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      they no longer use the original 70s-era TOW
      the TOW-2B is a much newer weapon, having been developed in the 2000s

      its now a wireless weapon that uses a radio uplink, allowing it to be fired over water or vegetation that could tangle the wires
      and has a fly-over mode to attack thinner top armor

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ah I see thats much better. How does it compare to the other 2000s+ ATGMs

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Not bad, but not a USAF level of gap. The big limiter is not being able to fire on the move, which is an issue pretty much everyone has. If they could get that working reliably, it would be a big shift upwards in the Bradley's capability, alongside the HMMVW mounts we've seen Ukraine using.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >its now a wireless weapon that uses a radio uplink, allowing it to be fired over water or vegetation that could tangle the wires
        Do you know if the new TOW missile fixed the problem with firing from a slope?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I have wondered why the Luftwaffe didn't take a frickhuge rocket like a double payload buzzbomb and launch it from a bomber with wire guidance into the allied bomber boxes. Seems like they would have had the technology for it

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Old =/= bad
      I know the DoD is hankering to give Raytheon another trillion for a new ATGM but there is nothing wrong with the TOW. The biggest drawbacks is has is it's not fire & forget and the wires can be an issue for choppers when fired across valleys . The biggest pro is because it's wire guided and human aimed countermeasures are mostly ineffective, even if you pop smoke the operator has a pretty good idea where you are and it can't be jammed.
      Next gen ATGMs will all be fire and forget and likely have pop-up search modes where you don't need LOS to engage, this will be better but the TOW still works fine.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >can't be jammed.
        The original TOW (and variants up to -D, AKA “TOW2”) can be misdirected by IR dazzlers (Shtora-1, the “evil red eyes” on either side of the gun on Russian tanks). That said such countermeasure systems are not perfect at triggering and since later versions of the TOW missile use a pattern that can’t be known by the defending tank, they’re much less useful if not useless right now.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Shtora is arguably worse than useless because it's replacing two cheek ERA blocks. T-90S doesn't have Shtora and is better off for it.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I think they pretty much sent all the older TOWs to Syria where they've been very effective.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Isn't the TOW kinda old for a ATGM
      it has enough HE to blow a hole through any tank in the world

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have pissed on the tracks of that exact vehicle.

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Kek my bro, are you a Warthunder player?

    That shit makes me seethe

    • 11 months ago
      Yukari

      >play Warthunder
      >first cruise control speed is 5 km/h, can shoot TOW
      >second cruise control speed is just too fast to keep the launcher raised
      >reverse speed allows you to keep the TOW raised
      I fricking hate gaijin for "balancing" the Bradley like this. But their BMP-2M wunderwaffe is fine with fire on the move 1200mm pen tandem atgms

      https://i.imgur.com/kzVd3w3.png

      Does anyone have more pictures of the Bradley without the side plates? Those are the rarest pictures and you can really look at the shape of it without them.

      that's because it's the M2/M2A1 Bradley
      M2A2 and on have the side plates and front plate for extra protection vs 30mm

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >I fricking hate gaijin for "balancing" the Bradley like this. But their BMP-2M wunderwaffe is fine with fire on the move 1200mm pen tandem atgms
        Chill. Warthunder is the only place where Russian equipment performs as advertised. Let them have it.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >russian equipment works as advertised
          >Vikhrs have an airburst mode and are one of the deadliest a2a missiles in the game

          • 11 months ago
            Yukari

            correction: WT is the game where russians get to pretend their military isnt a joke

            https://i.imgur.com/XZI3R9N.jpg

            Is there a difference between the chassis of the Bradley between the M2 and M2A1? Seems one is smaller at the top than the other.

            No, AFAIK.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >No
              Interesting, I mean look at the M2A1 Bradley in this one

              https://i.imgur.com/XZI3R9N.jpg

              Is there a difference between the chassis of the Bradley between the M2 and M2A1? Seems one is smaller at the top than the other.

              and the one here

              https://i.imgur.com/kzVd3w3.png

              Does anyone have more pictures of the Bradley without the side plates? Those are the rarest pictures and you can really look at the shape of it without them.

              and the A1 one looks more sloped at the sides on top.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Is there a difference between the chassis of the Bradley between the M2 and M2A1? Seems one is smaller at the top than the other.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          nope: http://afvdatabase.com/usa/m2bradley.html
          http://afvdatabase.com/usa/m3bradley.html

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        imagine playing warthunder
        the entire game is just zigger cope

        • 11 months ago
          Yukari

          Dude there's nothing else if you want a semi-realistic PvP tank game rn
          >Steel Beasts: Dead, full of elitist 40 year olds
          >WoT: Don't make me laugh
          >Armored Warfare: Dead, Russian P2W turbo wank
          >GHPC: Not multiplayer, still in pre-alpha

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's going to be GHPC when they finally fricking finish it. But agreed

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          I hate germany mains and want them to suffer terribly. Land sea or air, they all get the 120mm SAP.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Be glad you never played back in like the 2012-2013 beta days when yak3-5s flew like literal UFOs and didn’t trigger cannon rounds hitting the wood sections of the airframe

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >playing war thunder post-2016
        lol
        lmao even

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          what happened in 2016?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            I really want to like the m163 but the fire control is ass until you get used to it

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              When I finally got the LAV-AD it's the most fun I've had in War Thunder in a while. Bigger BRRRRTTTT that can actually kill most tanks from the side and stingers that sometimes work.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            they opened the flood gates to late cold war equipment
            i played war thunder from the beginning and remember the developers constantly saying they would not add equipment made after the korean war
            war thunder went from comfy to moronic

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Does anyone have more pictures of the Bradley without the side plates? Those are the rarest pictures and you can really look at the shape of it without them.

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Once eyebrow has risen, they undestand everything.

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    the TOW was actually an afterthought that was hastily bolted on when they realized they wouldn't get funded unless the brad could fire missiles too. that's why it's in that moronic pod and the reload sequence looks like some serious dogfrick nonsense. still, one of the few american-made vehicles of that era that can actually fired ATGM's and hit something. bizarre, tragic, sad, and yet...just effective enough to be worth the money. the story of the USA MIC in a nutshell

    • 11 months ago
      Yukari

      >I get all of my information from Pentagon Wars
      sit down and shut up dumbass

      >No
      Interesting, I mean look at the M2A1 Bradley in this one [...] and the one here [...] and the A1 one looks more sloped at the sides on top.

      might be an optical illusion

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Read a book you stupid frick.

        • 11 months ago
          Yukari

          I actually have read several books about the Bradley's development, you watched an insane man's schizoid rantings and accepted it unquestioningly like a midwit.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >just effective enough to be worth the money
      Meanwhile Bradley was the platform with the most tank kills...

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I assume you're talking about Desert Storm, and I've only ever found evidence of Bradleys having the most kills of armored vehicles in general, as opposed to tanks specifically

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Even if this is true (it isn’t) it’s inclusion has been proven as worthwhile

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Will Russia understand?

  9. 11 months ago
    Yukari

    [...]

    but I'm not trying to be a superhero on PrepHole, I'm already a superhero in real life, chump

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]
    but I'm not trying to be a superhero on PrepHole, I'm already a superhero in real life, chump

    You're both homosexuals

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think we should put ATGMs on more things
    >Take Falcon style unmanned turret
    >Fill up all that lost turret width with ATGMs
    >Tank with 10 ATGMs in addition to its main gun
    Probably wouldn’t carry reloads but I doubt you need reloads when you have ten ATGMs and a 120mm gun.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      There's cannon fired ATGMs made in Israel.

      https://i.imgur.com/NxvNgbo.png

      >I get all of my information from Pentagon Wars
      sit down and shut up dumbass
      [...]
      might be an optical illusion

      nope: http://afvdatabase.com/usa/m2bradley.html
      http://afvdatabase.com/usa/m3bradley.html

      Looking more at it it seems without the armor plates on the sides the Bradley has two different looking sides. The left and right side of the Bradley look different from each other. Is that because of the firing ports?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        wait until you learn the abraps turret isn't centered, isn't symmetrical, and the road wheels don't line up

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          it'd because the turret is off-center

          Yeah I only found that out now about the Bradley since its usually covered with the side plates. I wonder if the turretless Bradley APC is the same like this.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Literally the second line in the M2 link anon posted earlier is "Its two-man turret was offset to the right to maximize the room in the passenger compartment, which held six dismounts."

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        it'd because the turret is off-center

  12. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Where's that clip of the Russian commentator talking about raising their eyebrow?

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    How did an APC end up with a turret and all that shit bolted onto it?

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wished we still had M163 VADS for drones and helicopters.

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Moving coffin.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      you're right, what Ukraine needs is more Gavins

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *