>start losing. >TIME FOR WARCRIMES

>start losing
>TIME FOR WARCRIMES
god fucking damn i hate this war so much, i hope none of you will get to witness these horrors

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Chloropicrin is harmful to humans. It can be absorbed systemically through inhalation, ingestion, and the skin. At high concentrations it is severely irritating to the lungs, eyes, and skin.[25] In World War I German forces used concentrated chloropicrin against Allied forces as a tear gas. While not as lethal as other chemical weapons, it caused vomiting and forced Allied soldiers to remove their masks to vomit, exposing them to other, more toxic chemical gases used as weapons during the war.
    op is a fag 'cause its also used in agriculture.
    >In 2008 the US EPA re-approved chloropicrin as safe for use in agricultural settings, stating that treatments "can provide benefits to both food consumers and growers. For consumers, it means more fresh fruits and vegetables can be cheaply produced domestically year-round because several severe pest problems can be efficiently controlled."
    while it doesnt discount the usage of it, its so weak and does not make eyeballs pop out.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      So this is just some leftover shit from the Chernobyl shit? Why must they lie? They were the one who started the war lol.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        what the fuck did you just write.
        I was saying that its unlikely that chloropicrin was used. i did not discount that other chemicals were used.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >ay man that shits whack yo get that shit out of here man fuckin shit man

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Indeed. Don't get me wrong though, if you panic in such a case and start to wildly rub your eyes you could actually start to tear your own skin.

      Chloropin is essentially tear gas that can't be tactically exploited because it fucks a lot of protective gear as well, so while it forces your enemy to fuck off, it also forces you to fuck off.

      Chances are this was less a concerted effort and more a desperate attempt by a garrison to save their asses

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        while yes but we have not yet seen or heard of russia using biological suits for this kind of deployment,
        the odds are that a storage shed of this stuff was nuked and it spilled out over the area.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >op is a fag 'cause its also used in agriculture.
      You will find that many pesticides can be either directly utilized as chemical weapons or are only one or two synthetic steps away from chemical weapons.
      If it kills bugs, it will probably also kill humans.
      Humans are bugs are not THAT different

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        because raid will kill us right? the bug world is very different due to the differences in the thickness of our skin and shit

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >because raid will kill us right?
          Go huff a bottle of raid and see how that goes.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            is that what we do to insects, nah man we spry them with it, if i spray myself with raid ( i have) it doesnt have the same effect

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Insects breath through their skin retard

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              You fucking failed biology class, didn't you?

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous
              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Cool gif, anon. Very informative.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          And the application of the chemical is also different when used for different purposes. How else do you think chlorine gas was used to kill people in WW1 but chlorine is now used to clean our pools?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Inhale a few lungfuls of raid and report back to us on how you feel

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            not the same application that we do on bugs. we dont stand there with a mini gas mask and make em inhale it.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >we don't make em inhale it
              Yes you do because bugs breathe through tiny holes scattered all across their exoskeleton. Go inhale a few lungfuls of raid and report back to us on how you feel

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Yes you do because bugs breathe through tiny holes scattered all across their exoskeleton. Go inhale a few lungfuls of raid and report back to us on how you feel
                thats exactly why i said we arent the same as bugs retard

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You really want to die on Mount Stupid, don’t you

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Consumer-grade spray products do very little for a small amount of time. If the insect gets into direct contact with the spray, it acts as a nerve-gas. The active ingredient is some pyrethroid which binds with neurons and causes them to keep firing by preventing the sodium channels from closing. Essentially, it overloads their nervous system causing paralysis (not unlike a seizure). All their muscles spasm and insects die, feeling rudimentary levels of pain (not like we do in the full meaning of the word).

                >thats exactly why i said we arent the same as bugs retard
                But we are:
                >Bug breathes in pesticide
                >dies
                >human breathes in pesticide
                >dies

                Where is the difference?

                the difference is that raid is a nerve gas and thus does not need inhalation

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                So if I go huff an equivalent amount of raid by weight that will kill an insect scaled up to my body mass, I’ll be fine?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                insects dont huff it
                > The pyrethrum in the Raid (or any other pyrethroid insecticide) penetrates the cuticle and binds to the sodium channels in the nerves, stopping all muscle activity-including breathing and heartbeat. The effect on insect is similar to the effect of nerve agent on a human being. While it is VERY toxic to insects, it is almost harmless to mammals.

                youll probably get sick but wont die

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You will definitely die if you huff that much Pyrethrum.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                how much are we talking, i fail to see any mention of gallons (or shock and horror) or liters. or any kind of weight based measurement

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                The equivalent amount you'd use on an insect.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                th equivalent to cill a cockaroach wth raid would be like .1% per mass weight

                you guys keep arguing bout drowning insects in it while a nerve gas has nothing to do with breathing.
                i thought glowies atleast could like, use the dark net and find a dark wikipedia or something

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >th equivalent to cill a cockaroach wth raid would be like .1% per mass weight
                Are you a bad enough dude to inhale 0.1% of your bodyweight in Raid?
                That'd be about 8 grams.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                So he weighs 8 kg according to you?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                he's not exactly a big guy

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                for me.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The active ingredient is some pyrethroid which binds with neurons and causes them to keep firing by preventing the sodium channels from closing.
                gee, I wonder if pyrethroid toxicity was at all known to exist in mammals.
                But that is besides the point, because many agricultural pesticides are either organophosphates, which are extremely toxic to basically everything that moves or compounds with loads of chlorines and nitrogens in it and just looking at those structures you know that it can't be good for you.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                no.
                my point was that not all insecticides that we make for insects affects humans since your argument was that humans=bugs

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                And my point is that if you douse someone in enough raid they'll die.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                yeah you can drown them in it but thats not the same thing as a quick spray or are you a retard and drown your poor insect in an entire aerosol bottle of raid

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Man I barely passed organic chem in college and I can still see that this will fuck you up.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >thats exactly why i said we arent the same as bugs retard
                But we are:
                >Bug breathes in pesticide
                >dies
                >human breathes in pesticide
                >dies

                Where is the difference?

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              What do you think aerosolizing it around them does? They breathe it in.

              is that what we do to insects, nah man we spry them with it, if i spray myself with raid ( i have) it doesnt have the same effect

              Because you didn't spray yourself with as much. An insect gets a proportionally much higher dose, because insects are very small. Humans are big, so they require more.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >op is a fag 'cause its also used in agriculture.
          You will find that many pesticides can be either directly utilized as chemical weapons or are only one or two synthetic steps away from chemical weapons.
          If it kills bugs, it will probably also kill humans.
          Humans are bugs are not THAT different

          Both G and V series nerve agents evolved from pesticide research after discovering they were not only good at killing bugs, but killing just about anything with a nervous system.
          Organophosperous pesticides still continue to be used, albeit much milder ones. A person exposed to them would exhibit classical nerve agent symptoms.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Humans are bugs are not THAT different

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        t. turk

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Humans are bugs are not THAT different
        Turkish feelers typed this

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The antidotes for nerve agent and pesticides include atropine. They're very similar and mostly vary by concentration.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        This is true. The Haber-Bosch (nitrogen fixation from air) process not only led to an explosion in food production (artificial fertilizer), it also led to literal explosions. Explosives, fertilizers, poisons, medicines, etc. can all be made in more or less the same way, provided that you understand what is going on, and how a given reaction will proceed. The actual chemicals often barely differ or even don't differ at all. For example, trinitroglycerin (explosive) is given as heart attack medication.
        In terms of pesticides and antibiotics, this is even more true. The difficulty in medicinal chem/drug development is finding a drug that interacts with your target while also not fucking up too many other things or getting fucked up by too many other things. Chemically, we are really not that different from bugs. We're certainly more different from bacteria than we are from bugs.

        >t. chemchad

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      roundup kills weed, and it can kill you just as fine.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        No, it's not that toxic, you'll just probably get cancer if you are exposed to too much of the stuff.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          cancer? glyphosate is an antibiotic, it starves you to death and creates excess cell death

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Why are you comparing it to cancer in a container?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Hey, fumigation guy here. We add and then remove the fucking poison before it gets to the stores. Are you retarded? Huff some methyl bromide for me real quick cause it's so safe that we use it on grain

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Same fumigation guy here, all of you are fucking retarded and making the equivalent argument of "if I drink gas I'll go faster cause that's what cars do." Please leave the actual poison chemicals to the soldiers and exterminators so you don't all end up dying cause you didn't read a label

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        why are you talking about a completely different insect spray that works entirely different to raid then lmao

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          the point being argued is "pesticides kill humans".
          And MeBr will definitely kill you.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            no the argument was "not all pesticides are the same, and bugs are different from humans"

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              see

              >op is a fag 'cause its also used in agriculture.
              You will find that many pesticides can be either directly utilized as chemical weapons or are only one or two synthetic steps away from chemical weapons.
              If it kills bugs, it will probably also kill humans.
              Humans are bugs are not THAT different

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      LMAO it is still being used as a chemical weapon, even if it was basic bitch tear gas that would still be a war crime.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        so police using tear gas is considered a war crime? i think you need to check that bud

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          no, because police actions are not wars and you can war crime your own guys.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          No, because the police aren't at war with the rioters. Using tear gas is a war crime and this has been established since before WW2, why the fuck even argue otherwise?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            no, because police actions are not wars and you can war crime your own guys.

            the point being argued is "pesticides kill humans".
            And MeBr will definitely kill you.

            >The Geneva Convention clearly states that “Mustard Gas” or any kind of nerve agent like “Sarin Gas” is expressly forbidden. “Mustard Gas” has unusual properties, in which yellow pus-filled blisters, blister the lungs skin and can render the victim blind, is known as a blister agent. It has a mustard garlic or horseradish odor, and is yellow or green in color. Tear gas is considered a non-lethal alternative and isn’t banned by the Geneva Convention. This is used the world over by police to control riots. There is a small percentage of any population who exhibit reactions due to exposures to any kind of gas or chemical agents.

            goddamn im dabbing on glowies tonight

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Tear gas is neither a mustard gas nor a nerve agent. it's an irritant.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                who cares, get dabbed on mr cia

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous
              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                a tear gas can be made that isnt used for riot control, get dabbed on once again

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                what has this got to do with the op?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                no idea im 7 anons away from op

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >merely pretending

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                what you thought all tear gases were the same?
                watch some Nile Red pls

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                > Somewhere on this Earth, a fat autismo thinks he's dabbing on everyone by being a retard

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Declaration IV of the 1899 Hague Convention: "The Contracting Powers agree to abstain from the use of projectiles the object of which is the diffusion of asphyxiating or deleterious gases."
              >1925 Geneva Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare: "Whereas the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of all analogous liquids materials or devices, has been justly condemned by the general opinion of the civilized world; and whereas the prohibition of such use has been declared in Treaties to which the majority of Powers of the world are Parties; and To the end that this prohibition shall be universally accepted as a part of International Law, binding alike the conscience and the practice of nations."

              The use of tear gas is unequivocally banned in war and has been for over 120 years.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Do police commit war crimes every time they use hollow points?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Gee, I wonder whether this non-military act done during peacetime is a WAR crime?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Twitter rando could've just gotten the agent wrong

      Or the whole story is bullshit, that's also very possible

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Water is used in both torture and as life saving fluid

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You do know Zyklon B used to be used for pest control?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, they used it with the garden gnomes

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        HCN will kill absolutely everything that is alive, anon.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >It's good for conumers
      >fresh fruits and vegetables are cheaper to grow
      I see their priorities.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >op is a fag 'cause its also used in agriculture.

      you mean like zyklon B was?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Well the holohoax is a lie so yes just like B, or do all the gas chambers near you have wooden doors?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >While not as lethal
      So it's still lethal.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      White helmets strike again, thanks

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ershdb/emergencyresponsecard_29750034.html

    Look, far be it from me to put something past the Russians, but chemical weapons are a BIG escalation, and I'm not finding any indication the Chloropicrin causes the eyes to burst.
    Also, gib video gay.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://twitter.com/igor_1941/status/1578113179095339014

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        all he says is we have two guys in bad shape, and asks them for their names.
        i wouldnt be surprised if russia eventually uses something illegal but youre making shit up

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ukie here: Can confirm not a thing was said about gas, only that the guys are in critical shape and are from the 99th Brigade. Might've got a lot of debris thrown into the eyes from an exploding shell or something else which would destroy the eyes.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Eye gear has not been very prevalent until now in this war. It should be.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/me6bQSP.png

        >start losing
        >TIME FOR WARCRIMES
        god fucking damn i hate this war so much, i hope none of you will get to witness these horrors

        Those aren't chemical burns, they are thermal burns. Dudes got a faceful of kaboom, not gas.
        Fake News.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    how are people so dumb that they think thats what chemical weapon injuries look like

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      That is what mustard gas injuries can look like though. That's not mustard gas obviously but your disingenuous shitpost is incorrect as chemical weapons can produce effects like this.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's almost like we have thousands of images from WWI that look very similar.

      Fucking have a nice day.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        care to link some proof?

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >time for war crimes
    Are you implying the murdering of civilians back in April wasn’t a war crime?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Bucha massacre was commited by Ukrainians

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        for what reason? they don't need to prove to us that russians are inhuman, we already knew that

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Stop bargaining with the vatnik, you stupid fuck. There's satellite evidence Bucha was occupied by Russians during the massacre, and like 100 other massacres if that's not enough.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Ukrainians have commited continual civilian massacres and glownigs continue to deflect for them. Truly pathetic but in the end you want this precedent to massacre Americans.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Ukrainians have commited continual civilian massacres
              *Russians, leaving plenty of evidence of them.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              No, I want all Russians and Russian friendly people dead

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >chuds want everyone dead who will not acknowledge their pronouns and will not have sex with them

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Russian sympathizer is obsessed with transexuals
                Gee, what a shock.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >chud wants everything to be about it

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              If we were talking about this happening in, say, Donetsk or Luhansk, where there has been traditionally civilian resistance to the government, that's one thing. But we're talking about a town like an hour outside of Kyiv. What you're alleging is the same thing as if the NYPD genocided Yonkers.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                The amount of shilling went up, what happened this time?

                We have videos of Russians doing all kinds of war crimes.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Muh 6 gorillion Donbabwea children

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            there is also a drone video of chechens executing a civie

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous
      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        broofs ?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous
        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous
      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous
      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I used to believe Russians did it but zelensky got really indignant when European politicians said it should be investigated by international observers and accused them if defending russians for wanting to look into it so it never really was investigated and fell out of the news loop really quickly despite being a great potential propaganda tool.
        Something was definitely fucky there, Zelensky isn't retarded enough to let something like that just go considering how he treats every other Russian spergout.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Bucha was almost certainly done by Ukrainians.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Shame you have no evidence that that is the case, and no one believe you anyway.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          NYT, 2 separate articles
          Read between the lines.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Ah yes, the New York Times, that wellspring of truth and honesty

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              What’s wrong with the NYTIMES?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Considering how pro Ukraine nyt is, I’d say you’re just a misguided retard.

                NYT hasn't been anything other than an anxiety click machine plus DNC bootlicker for about a decade.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Considering how pro Ukraine nyt is, I’d say you’re just a misguided retard.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Someone’s eye balls just flew over my house!

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      lul

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    If this is real, isn't this pretty big news and might warrant further involvement of the west? It's no nuk, but chemical weapons are part of the ABC weapons nonetheless

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Eyebrows? Never heard of them

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Even Hitler in the depths of WWII didnt use poison gas. There are certain things you cant undo. Ukraine can make poison gas fairly easily if they wanted to. They could probably make a nuke to take out Moscow as well. First time a nation at war can make a nuke and chooses not to.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, but the allies took the war to Germany proper and if Hitler had authorized the use of chemical weapons on london I've no doubt Berlin would have paid in kind - think of it as a precursor to MAD.
      Situation in ukraine is different sadly, in that putin pretty much has a free hand until he uses nukes...

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It’s just a bot… do not interact with it.
        Things are so bad right now they don’t even send the good shills anymore, just some retarded trainees and some boys. Ignore them.
        And yes, butcha and every civilian war crime in Ukraine was obviously done by Russia, and the payment will be in blood.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >They could probably make a nuke to take out Moscow as well.
      No they couldn't. That shit is complicated and takes a lot of time.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Time for dirty bomb fun times

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >That shit is complicated and takes a lot of time.
        Anon...we did it with 1940's technology

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yes. "we". The civilized people. G*rmoids are too retarded for that.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            we are talking about ukies now
            rent free btw

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Not to trivialize nuclear weapons design, but gun style is pretty straightforward. The big limiter is mostly collecting enough (like 100lbs worth) of fissile material. Combined mass after firing should be enough to go critical.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Fortunately, Ukraine has a very large domestic nuclear power industry so they already have ample stocks of enriched uranium.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      i think it goering at his trial that said the germans didnt use chemical weapons because they feared like retaliation, and they didnt have enough gas masks for their horses.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        He was probably right. When the a potential sealion was still a threat, the Brits stockpiled shitloads of the stuff. They were fully prepared to not just retaliate, but were planning to blanket the channel with gas in the case of invasion, even planned to rig some tigermoth trainers as warcrime crop dusters. They also had alot of interesting ideas on weaponising petrol too.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, Brit 'ere. Occasionally someone still finds a flame fougasse that's been abandoned since 41 on a country road lul. It's fucking based. If the Nazis had been stupid enough to make landfall it would've been a hilarious slaughter. The UK might not have survived as a coherent nation, but its people would've RETVRNED TO CELT and begun bogdwelling to give the Nazis a guerrilla war without end. They'd never hold the island truly and any imported Germans would've lived in perpetual fear.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Also because Hitler got gassed in ww1 and was not a fan. I know retards will cry about gas chambers but the gas used there are honestly an enormously less painful way to go than mustard gas.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Even Hitler didn’t use poison gas

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yes. He went through WW1 and saw the effects of mustard gas firsthand, he literally thought it was too inhumane to use it warfare.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >it does not count if it used against POWs and garden gnomes
        eh, yeah, i think?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          zyklon B was used for delousing, not killing.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >literal HCN
            >delousing
            It won't just kill lice, but everything that's alive.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              is that why so many people were walking around as POWs when they all went through the zyklon showers upon arrival?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                POWs did not take Zyklon showers. Zyklon B was used as a delousing agent for clothing--- and not while it was being worn.
                In fact, Zyklon B was hydrogen cyanide mixed with an eye irritant to warn people that they were in the presence of a VERY poisonous substance and should gtfo the area and seek medical attention asap.
                It was only ever deliberately used on people as a means of murder.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Zyklon B was hydrogen cyanide mixed with an eye irritant to warn people that they were in the presence of a VERY poisonous substance
                HCN is my favorite toxic chemical, because if you can smell it, you're dead, but only about 40% of people even have the gene to smell it at all.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Delousing agents are not chemical warfare anon

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Even Hitler didn’t use poison gas
        Correct.
        For one, he'd been seriously injured in a gas attack near the end of the war.
        Secondly, even as bad as shit was going for his wehrmacht near the end, he knew if his forces used gas that they'd receive it 10 fold (and he was right, we would have gassed every fucking german).

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Not in battle, no. The Holocaust is a different matter.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          The what?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      He was aware that G series nerve agents had been publicly described in chemistry journals released internationally. Those same G series nerve agents had been brought to his attention as possible wunderwaffen, far more deadly than previous CWs. He elected not to use them because he didn't have enough masks, MOPP style gear wasn't practically a thing(we're talking nerve gas after all), and he knew the allies had the same journals available to them and could vastly out produce Germany.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Zyklon /b/ruh

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      If this is real, isn't this pretty big news and might warrant further involvement of the west? It's no nuk, but chemical weapons are part of the ABC weapons nonetheless

      https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ershdb/emergencyresponsecard_29750034.html

      Look, far be it from me to put something past the Russians, but chemical weapons are a BIG escalation, and I'm not finding any indication the Chloropicrin causes the eyes to burst.
      Also, gib video gay.

      https://i.imgur.com/me6bQSP.png

      >start losing
      >TIME FOR WARCRIMES
      god fucking damn i hate this war so much, i hope none of you will get to witness these horrors

      >sources: twitterdiarrheaface.jpg
      >plebbit style concern trolling
      White Anglo Saxon trany hands typed these posts

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >They could probably make a nuke to take out Moscow as well. First time a nation at war can make a nuke and chooses not to.
      Wrong in every way. Ukraine has no short term nuclear potential.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ah yes, Serhii.
    The "Ukrainian" schizo vatniks love to post.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Don't even need to see the video just that freeze frame already looks fake as hell.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Eastern euros can't help themselves they love war crimes.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    dollar store halloween fake blood

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Looks more like shrapnel injuries, chemical weapons can produce all kinds of injuries but not localized bleeding.

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I haven't seen this reported anywhere on UA channels. Chances are this is fake.

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >twatter
    Don't care

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    74D here. I don't see any evidence of chemical attacks on these guys. They sure do look like a mortar or artillery shell slapped their shit with some shrapnel though. Another possibility is one of those thermobaric rockets the Russians have for RPGs.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      That makes sense, massive overpressure into the eye sockets, and *pop*. They also mount them on the more modern rocket artillery.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Problem is localizing the pressure only in th eyes. At that blood pressure plenty of other vessels would pop first and hemorrhage would happen before eyes bursting out.

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Looks and sounds like Russian agitprop. Where would they even get chemical weapons at this point? It's pure fearmongering to try to stop the advance.
    You're right about it reeking of desperation.

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >there's going to be a mobilization if you don't stop!
    >surely the gloves are coming off nao!
    >if you don't stop, we're gonna nook, aaaah!
    >stop, we're using chemical weapons!
    I wish I could hate Russians to death.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      i wish i could hate americans to death

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        seethe thirdie

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        there are always non-american websites you could visit

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          sure but american sites are faster since i'm in america.

          i'm the wisconsin guy. back from a three week ban.

          anyone want to meet up so i can beat you to death with a hammer?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            You could always beat yourself to death, bonus being you won't see Americans anymore once you get to Hell

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              well the option of whoever comes winning is always on the table. you could attempt to send me to hell

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      i wish i could hate americans to death

      https://i.imgur.com/me6bQSP.png

      >start losing
      >TIME FOR WARCRIMES
      god fucking damn i hate this war so much, i hope none of you will get to witness these horrors

      i bet good money cia is behind this

      they ether knew iit was going to happen and didn't warn them so people get upset or it was them that gas them i judt know cia are behind this

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, you didn't fuck up and decide to support the most irredeemable shit again to fit in with the glavset hookers on 4chan pretending to be users, it's actually a conspiracy against your sad, forgotten ass by multiple government agencies.
        How could this be happening to you again?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          this comment proves how it's cia

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            That's ridiculous, there's no way we would have the time to shitpost on PrepHole

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      send the ukranians canisters of CS powder

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      wtf, is this how they really transport watermelons over there?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        nature is healing anon, they are returning to their ancestral lands

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        it's cheap, efficent and keeps them fresh

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >cheap
          Well, if you ignore the "shrinkage" due to me rolling up and loading up on watermelons whenever they'd do this.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Peacefully migrating watermelons are safe from packs of morons under the watchful eyes of their caretakers

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    link https://streamable.com/io6cwf

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/me6bQSP.png

      >start losing
      >TIME FOR WARCRIMES
      god fucking damn i hate this war so much, i hope none of you will get to witness these horrors

      Yeah, i'll call it twitter retardation, looks more like dudes got shelled. Too bad camera guy don't says anything about what happened to them.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      That blood sure looks "oxygenated", like it just happened.
      Or this is propaganda and they're using hollyweird tier makeup to make it look like it does.

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >NOOOOOOO YOU CANT JUST USE CHEMICAL WEAPONS TO WIN IT DOESNT COUNT NOOOOOOOO

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      lol

      >no cheating bro cmon fight the war fairly bro srsly don't make me get the referee involved

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        And your vatBlacks are still losing somehow. Why does this keep happening to you?

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'll wait until I see it on NYTimes to verify. I don't trust this.

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Highly likely that Russia will use chemical or biological weapons at some point, this should hardly be surprising.

  23. 2 months ago
    Anom

    Yeah.

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >war crime
    Who's going to enforce these laws?
    Exactly. War crimes don't exist.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Who's going to enforce these laws?
      Some fat banker that controls a fuckload of the Russian oligarchy's assets

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Pssst... the 1925 Geneva Protocols don't prohibit the retaliatory use of chemical weapons.

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >what an eyepopping escalation by the russian army

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      CARLOS!

  26. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Russians are capable of any abominable act one can imagine. They are an evil race that feel pleasure in being bestial and brutal.

  27. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    webm

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      all he says is we have two guys in bad shape, and asks them for their names.
      i wouldnt be surprised if russia eventually uses something illegal but youre making shit up

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      makes me think about the khamar death

      it was probably the same gas

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Jesus fuck.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >face red and bloody
      >hand and side of neck pristine
      so not chemical

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        what's going to suffer from chemical exposure first: skin or mucous membrane?

  28. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >WARCRIMES

  29. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    If they said chlorine gas then I would understand but very strong tear gas? Idk man seems like propaganda to me.

  30. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    prove to me america and cia wasn't behind this?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >proving a negative
      Christ, what education system failed you?

  31. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Gradenko. Begin full-scale production of the gas.

  32. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    here we go boys, hold on tight

  33. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Tbqh I believe that both Russians and Ukranians commit war crimes on each other, mostly because I think almost everyone who follows this kind of stuff has seen it on both sides. But, the Ukranian propaganda machine is getting more and more holocaust tier and it's honestly really fucking gay. I'm sick of seeing this zelensky gay garden gnome rat beg for money every day too. It's all so tiresome. Almost 10 years of this shit and the garden gnomes finally got what they wanted, well almost, because we all know Globohomo West wants war with Russia (Globohomo East)

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Obviously shit happens in war, shooting even a russian in peacetime is considered murder, it's purely by necessity that those rules are thrown out the window. But Ukie "warcrimes" are not committed against civilians, and they're usually shit like feeding a POW hot sauce or filming them saying their treatment is decent. And wouldn't be happening at all if not for Russia's invasion, so the "both sides" story doesn't really hold up when foreign soldiers are only on one country's territory. This isn't a civil war, and there's no equal invasion of Russia.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >they're usually shit like feeding a POW hot sauce or filming them saying their treatment is decent.
        People don't care about that. The ukies have done plenty of executions of unarmed and incapacitated Russians. At this point I'm just glad I'm not from a slavic country. Their capacity to do evil things to each other is remarkable.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >because we all know Globohomo West wants war with Russia (Globohomo East)
      moron

  34. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Both sides have been committing war crimes. Both sides have good people trying to do the right thing. I still remember that Ukrainian girl who on day one of the invasion uploaded a video showing her dead mother and the dead Russian soldier who she credited as having died trying to protect her family from the psychotic bloodlust of his comrades.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Both sides
      unironically kys

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Both sides.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's not a war, it's a special military operation.

  35. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Russians start using chemical weapons
    >The US start dressing the Ukrainians all fancy now

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >The World Russia's chimpout. Join Duty and save the innocent. Ukie, protect the world from The Monke. Join Duty."

  36. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    D-Do the Russians know which way the wind blows in that region?
    Big hint, not at the Ukrainian’s lines.

  37. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Pretty sure your eyes won't melt from something like that even if you poured it straight into the eyes. Sounds like some Propaganda to get "western" sympathy points but they failed to do basic research.

    Or, because Ukraine is poor agricultural shithole, they just had a shed of pesticide get exploded nearby and Private Dumbshit clawed his eyes out from exposure as he ripped the skin and the exposure got worse.

  38. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >dey be usin kemikal wepoonz n shiet!
    ah yes, the good old pretext for nukes

  39. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >okay look, I know we've always lied about our enemies using chemical weapons in the past
    >but this time we're not lying

  40. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I've seen war crimes from both sides since the start, some more based than others.
    Neither is gonna make me pretend they have anything to do with moral superiority in the slavic genocide of the current decade.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *