So ukraine is going to get british UNDERWATER SUICIDE DRONES. How the fuck do you counter this? How will they use them?

So ukraine is going to get british UNDERWATER SUICIDE DRONES.
How the fuck do you counter this?
How will they use them?
What is the range of these things?

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >How will they use them?
    Blow up all three kilos in Black Sea. If Kursk didn't sink Putins presidency, triple Kursk will

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Surely in port they're behind antisub netting?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'd wager russian anti-sub netting is probably just fishing net

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        They govt may have paid for sub netting, whats there, who knows, only an attacker will find out

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >UNDERWATER SUICIDE DRONES
        So a torpedo?

        I kid but modern torpedos and mine-pedos have basically been drones for quite a long time, the line is very blurry.

        >Surely in port they're behind antisub netting?
        Then it's neutralized and can't do shit, including protecting the bridge.

        If they do come out to play (and I'm sure they're on patrol) then they suddenly have a fight on their hand instead of a free hand to hunt.

        >Why do vatniks keep insisting that Nordstream is german owned when its russian?
        Destroying the pipeline was a last-ditch gambit to drive a wedge between western Europe and the anglosphere after attempts to use the pipelines and gas as a bargaining chip failed twice. One part of Nordstream 2 was deliberately not destroyed so they can continue to dangle that 'carrot.' Germany does not appear to have "bought" it and there's been no relief on the pressure on Russia. It seems when it comes to ops more complex than giving money to communist or nazi morons to cause trouble and stir up violence, the FSB can't do shit.

        >Destroying the pipeline was a last-ditch gambit to drive a wedge between western Europe and the anglosphere
        My pet theory that has no evidence whatsoever is that Germany did it themselves to shut up the parts of their government tempted by appeasement and gas. Easier to settle internal discord and present a united front. Just a Columbus burning the ships after landing thing.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It was a country that hates both Germany and Russia and had every reason to want Nordstream to fail so Baltstream would succeed. A country with extensive experience working on pipes (such as in toilets), a country that in Miltonesque fashion gets kicked around and spit on and finally burns down the building in the end. A country whose saboteurs can never be charged due to their utterly unpronounceable names. It was Poland. It was always Poland.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's far more plausible that Russia did it to shut up those tempted with appeasement and gas. Given how close the explosions were to an undersea power cable and the Baltic Pipe, it's possible they were also trying to literally weaponize the pipe.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            And Russia didn’t want the germs to cave because?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >weld wire cutters to front of drone
        >assume (rightly) that russian anti-sub nets don't have functioning integrity sensors

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe up the yield and send them after the Crimea bridge supports?

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Black see fleet got hard countered again it seems. Also the bridge could be destroyed if possible to detonate this thing near a column or two. Things are getting Hispanicy

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >How will they use them?

      crimean bridge supports

      >crimean bridge supports
      those things are too big and full reinforced concrete

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        just hit it repeatedly and at a daily interval too

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        No, they are standing on metal rods that allow current to pass. There's no concrete underwater

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >duuhh they build concrete pylons on metal rods
          Have you never watched any vids on how bridges are made? It's concrete to the bed of the body of the water. There are metal tubes driven into the bed of the body of water but they are then encased within the concrete structure.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            You have zero knowledge about Crimean bridge. Why the fuck are you trying to argue, are you retarded?

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Huh, that's pretty neat. Presumably they're just as strong as the concrete above, though?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Imagine if you could detonate explosives below the concrete base of the pillar, between the pylons. The same way you'd break a ships keel by detonating a torpedo below the ship.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          No. Unless Russians are truely fucking retarded and I wouldn't put it past them.
          There should be concrete all the way to the seabed. Not just to take the weight, but also because concrete protects the Steel from corrosion.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        just use it against whatever is trying to repair the bridge instead

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I like your style anon.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is what sank the Moskva but they couldn't say it because it was being operated by NATO glowmorons.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      moskva was struck above the waterline

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Moskva was scuttled because of a fire in the engine room.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Moskva is fine

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Moskva was sunk by the storm.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      the moskva never existed, it's all an elaborate russian psyop

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >How will they use them?

    crimean bridge supports

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The eternal Anglo rules the waves, of course he has nefarious tricks up his sleeve to use against the ancient enemy of the Rus

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      the storm that sunk the moskva was summoned by the ancient tidesages of skegness

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Stop giving away state secrets

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >UNDERWATER SUICIDE DRONES
    It's a mine-detecting UUV. Nothing explosive on it

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Are you really going to believe the public press release?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        No, I'm going to believe your retarded bullshit you just made up instead. Goddamn cranial gimp.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      They blow up next to mines

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      why would they need that when they don't have a surface fleet? unless...

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Britain was selling them minesweeper boats before the war even started. These drones come with the boats so Ukrainians are being trained on them accordingly

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ukies are getting super secret amphibious transforming HIMARS

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >What is the range of these things?
    They can reach Russia by river.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What is the tonnage of explosives on that thing? Is it comparable to anti-ship torpedo and can take down russian navy ship or is it just some little shitass explosive?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Zero
      The UK has German seafox drones with a 1.5kg shaped-charge for underwater demolitions. This is not Seafox
      The UUV pictured is a Remus mine-hunting drone that goes with the Sandown-class mine-hunting boats that the UK is supplying to Ukraine

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why are we assuming the primary objective is destroying a ship?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        What's their primary objective then? Float around?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          For someone with limited imagination the smoke is probably pouring out of your ears. You did good, now go take a nap.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Don't be an asshole and tell me!

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Those seem familiar

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The diameter of the pipe is just big enough to march a single column of dwarves all the way to St. petersburg so don't think there was a defensive motive for Putin to blow it up

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why do vatniks keep insisting that Nordstream is german owned when its russian?
      Is it to hide the fact that putin wont do anything about the USA destroying their billion dollars worth of infrastructure?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Why do vatniks keep insisting that Nordstream is german owned when its russian?
        Destroying the pipeline was a last-ditch gambit to drive a wedge between western Europe and the anglosphere after attempts to use the pipelines and gas as a bargaining chip failed twice. One part of Nordstream 2 was deliberately not destroyed so they can continue to dangle that 'carrot.' Germany does not appear to have "bought" it and there's been no relief on the pressure on Russia. It seems when it comes to ops more complex than giving money to communist or nazi morons to cause trouble and stir up violence, the FSB can't do shit.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >funded by mostly german companies
        >backed by german politcians that are pro-russian sellouts
        yeah bros, russians basically forced nordstream down germans throat! germany had strong anti russian sentiments and was constantly warning rest of EU member states to stay vigilant, decrease russian influence and keep army as big as bundeswehr.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        If it was the US then why the British suicide drones? Is this all under the orders of King Charles to continue the destruction of the Germans?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          The US govt' even said they would end nordstream 2. This war has been going on since 2014

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Britain doesn't take a shit without the US giving them permission first. Western Europe is essentially a vassal of the US at this point. sometimes, such as Libya, we treat them like a child who has his construction playset hammers and let them pretend that help daddy with his home improvement

          >wow you guys did a whole 15% of the airstrikes! whos a big boy?! you are!

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >How the fuck do you counter this?
    With under underwater drones.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    if in international waters that is used it is act of war by nato just saying))Langley busy to day

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Proof they can even find worthy targets??

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Deployable by drown

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >drones deploying drones
      droneception

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    These are just getting mine hunting drones to clear the Dniper and similar of mines, right? Underwater sensor detection are a UK specialty after all.
    I know you can maybe swap out some internals to add explosives but I don't think that's what they're for.

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >How the fuck do you counter this?
    By keeping your ships in harbor behind nets

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Their air force was trained in A10 and they didn't get shit, so don't get your hopes up..

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >British
    So it's probably shit, then.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      have a nice day

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Triggered bongoloid.
        >SA80 sucked until the Germans fixed it for them
        >chally sucks
        >Starstreak worked literally once
        >bongs fucked up the f-35 ejector seats
        >British cars are among the most unreliable in the world
        >Prince of Wales broken down hours after leaving port
        >economy going down the toilet

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Starstreak worked literally once
          That's not even true, we have several videos of them taking stuff down and claims over several more (but no footage, just witness reports).

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          If I posted every single US failure I'd have a long list too, but I don't, because we know they're exceptions.
          Same with bongs.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >SA80 sucked until the Germans fixed it for them
          Fixed by British engineers employed by a British owned company
          >chally sucks
          Nope, though it will once the downgrade is complete
          >Starstreak worked literally once
          Nope
          >bongs fucked up the f-35 ejector seats
          Nope
          >British cars are among the most unreliable in the world
          Only Vauxhall
          >Prince of Wales broken down hours after leaving port
          Meh shit happens.
          >economy going down the toilet
          Stronger than Germany’s but yeah it’s about to get fucked up real good

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Vauxhall got sold off to GM in like 1928 after WW1 or something like that
            Considering the trainwreck of GM, it explains pretty much everything you need to know.
            I believe the French own it now.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              GM is General Motors, which is American.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                PSA owns Vauxhall now, just as they own Opel whose designs Vauxhall rebadges as own cars.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >PSA
                Pic rel
                I still don't understand why we let foreign state owned entities buy out major industry for short term profit.
                In the case of the US ownership they just exploit the fuck out of workers, which I guess is fine as long as it's mutually beneficial. But we have to bail out these shitty companies all the time.
                As for Chyna, it actually lowkey pisses me off cause they just end up stripping them of IP, create factory clones in China and then shut down the factories in Europe.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              No wonder it’s shit.

              GM is General Motors, which is American.

              I think he meant it’s in French control now and that GM owning it shows how long it hasn’t been a British company.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Fixed by British engineers employed by a British owned company
            Bullshit. H&K is not British owned, and the redesign and new production took place in Germany. The Nottingham facility does assembly.
            >Nope
            Yep. They are made by Martin Baker, a British company in the UK. It was the USAF who discovered the issue.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              > H&K is not British owned, and the redesign and new production took place in Germany.
              It was then. Also people are allowed to leave the country with these things called passports.
              >ejector seats
              There’s nothing wrong with them. There was a qc issue on a few. Pretending that this is somehow the result of a design flaw is retarded.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It was made by the Americans my dude.

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >counter
    Anti-submarine warfare.
    >use
    Probably to continue to attack the Crimean bridge, or the Black Sea Fleet, or both. Depends on how many they're getting. If you have enough you could even attack ferries, lol.

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Goodnight, sweet prince

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Neva been done befoe

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Underwater suicide drones!
    So, Torpedoes?
    Might as well call an AIM 9 sidewinder a Suicide UAV.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Be careful, at this rate we'll be calling a regular bullet a 'chemically propelled, unmanned, kinetic kill vehicle" by 2030

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This is the reason why I utterly hate the word ”suicide drone”.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This is the reason why I utterly hate the word ”suicide drone”.

      They work in entirely different ways, stop being dumb.

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    doesnt really matter. cant compete against a nuclear powered nuclear tipped drone/torpedo poseidon

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >british UNDERWATER SUICIDE DRONES.
    Crimean bridge gets zerg rushed with 100 suicide drone subs

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >So ukraine is going to get british UNDERWATER SUICIDE DRONES.
    so torpedoes?

  26. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >How the fuck do you counter this?

    Submarine nets, a world war 1 invention. Nets are useful for catching underwater bio-drones, aka "fish" as well.

  27. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Black sea fleet bye bye.

  28. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nuke Sevastopol hopefully

  29. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    you mean the same ones the british used to destroy nord stream to create an ecological disaster?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The only people who benefited from that was Russia.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        IT WAS PUTLER! PUTLER BENEFITED BY DESTROYING HIS COUNTRIES ONLY SOURCE OF GDP AND LEVERAGE OVER EUROPE!!!!!!!! AHHHHH IM SO MAD IM GONNA BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOST

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Delusional

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          NS1 wasn't being used for gas exports anymore anyway, due to eternal ~~*maintenance*~~ issues.
          Putin really badly wants Europe to make use of NS2 instead, and guess which pipeline is still in working order.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah and turkstream is next.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah they have form for shenanigans. Look up the MS Estonia

  30. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Drones are countered with decoys and jamming. Same as any other torpedo. This is hardly a wonder weapon.

  31. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What differentiates these from a modern torpedo? Genuine question, as best I know modern torpedoes can also be operated remotely as well as independently under their own guidance.

  32. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You counter it by having people leak secret weapon deployments and send in counter defenses.

  33. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    blowing up pipe lines ./..

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *