So the "Soviet Big 7" turn out to be a nothing big burger?

So the "Soviet Big 7" turn out to be a nothing big burger?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The 122mm and 152mm self propelled artillery pieces seem to be doing a lot of damage in Ukraine
    And the Mi-24 Hind seems like a decent gunship, if a bit dated now
    Otherwise yeah they’re all shit

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >leveling residential buildings by depleting the entire artillery stockpile of the Soviet Union
      weird flex

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >war
    >both sides use mostly Soviet tech
    >one side doing well means Soviet tech is bad
    ????

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The side doing the best is also using western tech so yes.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The virgin BBC PUCCIA Mi-24 vs the Chad Mi-17 with jury rigged AGM-88s

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Anything on that picture is at least 40 years old

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      And? They're still the backbone of ex-soviet states and Russia

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Anything on that picture is at least 40 years old

        https://i.imgur.com/2jtcOcM.jpg

        So the "Soviet Big 7" turn out to be a nothing big burger?

        They were absolutely a threat when this picture was made (40ish) years ago, but not today, modernizations excepted.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          In 1981 when this poster was made, they didn't have man-portable top-attack antitank missiles, high-altitude loitering suicide munitions, reconnaisance quadcopters at the squad level, and decentralized networked fire control systems that can task fire missions and get artillery on target in five minutes or less.

          this.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        They are the backbone due to necessity not due to effectiveness.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No refunds.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    In 1981 when this poster was made, they didn't have man-portable top-attack antitank missiles, high-altitude loitering suicide munitions, reconnaisance quadcopters at the squad level, and decentralized networked fire control systems that can task fire missions and get artillery on target in five minutes or less.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They're still using half of that shit so at least it's somewhat reliable

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's "big nothing burger" you ESL moron. Only Americans should be allowed on /k/

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's all very outdated, but some of it is okay if you aren't an incompetent monke drunkard from Omsk.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Do bear in mind this is a training aid made to help troops understand enemy capabilities and prioritise fire; not quite a THIS-IS-THE-END-FLEE-FLEE-FOR-YOUR-LIVES infographic

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >T-34 was pretty bad though and it couldn't compete with the Tiger II

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I mean, it was 40 fricking years ago. what a moronic post

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Actually there is a lot of propaganda going around . The old systems will kill you dead today just as they would 40 years an ago . You wouldn’t want to be on the receiving end of any of their firepower.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *