The 122mm and 152mm self propelled artillery pieces seem to be doing a lot of damage in Ukraine
And the Mi-24 Hind seems like a decent gunship, if a bit dated now
Otherwise yeah they’re all shit
In 1981 when this poster was made, they didn't have man-portable top-attack antitank missiles, high-altitude loitering suicide munitions, reconnaisance quadcopters at the squad level, and decentralized networked fire control systems that can task fire missions and get artillery on target in five minutes or less.
In 1981 when this poster was made, they didn't have man-portable top-attack antitank missiles, high-altitude loitering suicide munitions, reconnaisance quadcopters at the squad level, and decentralized networked fire control systems that can task fire missions and get artillery on target in five minutes or less.
Do bear in mind this is a training aid made to help troops understand enemy capabilities and prioritise fire; not quite a THIS-IS-THE-END-FLEE-FLEE-FOR-YOUR-LIVES infographic
Actually there is a lot of propaganda going around . The old systems will kill you dead today just as they would 40 years an ago . You wouldn’t want to be on the receiving end of any of their firepower.
The 122mm and 152mm self propelled artillery pieces seem to be doing a lot of damage in Ukraine
And the Mi-24 Hind seems like a decent gunship, if a bit dated now
Otherwise yeah they’re all shit
>leveling residential buildings by depleting the entire artillery stockpile of the Soviet Union
weird flex
>war
>both sides use mostly Soviet tech
>one side doing well means Soviet tech is bad
????
The side doing the best is also using western tech so yes.
The virgin BBC PUCCIA Mi-24 vs the Chad Mi-17 with jury rigged AGM-88s
Anything on that picture is at least 40 years old
And? They're still the backbone of ex-soviet states and Russia
They were absolutely a threat when this picture was made (40ish) years ago, but not today, modernizations excepted.
this.
They are the backbone due to necessity not due to effectiveness.
No refunds.
In 1981 when this poster was made, they didn't have man-portable top-attack antitank missiles, high-altitude loitering suicide munitions, reconnaisance quadcopters at the squad level, and decentralized networked fire control systems that can task fire missions and get artillery on target in five minutes or less.
They're still using half of that shit so at least it's somewhat reliable
It's "big nothing burger" you ESL moron. Only Americans should be allowed on /k/
It's all very outdated, but some of it is okay if you aren't an incompetent monke drunkard from Omsk.
Do bear in mind this is a training aid made to help troops understand enemy capabilities and prioritise fire; not quite a THIS-IS-THE-END-FLEE-FLEE-FOR-YOUR-LIVES infographic
>T-34 was pretty bad though and it couldn't compete with the Tiger II
I mean, it was 40 fricking years ago. what a moronic post
Actually there is a lot of propaganda going around . The old systems will kill you dead today just as they would 40 years an ago . You wouldn’t want to be on the receiving end of any of their firepower.