The gen 1 was a jammomatic or so im told so it makes sense they would never really catch on. Shame since the gen 1 version is the most aesthetic by far. They may have fixed the reliability but that frick huge dust cover is so unnecessary.
Glocks suck >Shitty, unnatural grip angle >Adding, then removing finger grooves is innovation >Pay $600 and then change everything >Meh trigger >Glock leg, not a good gun for inexperienced shooters even though it is always a 1st suggestion >Plastic sights >Plastic guide rod >Unsupported chamber
Usually when I tell someone to get a glock its because Im kinda hoping they shoot themselves in the leg. Anyone I care about I suggest something with a hammer and dewienerer, yknow, something safe.
Not just that >proprietary rail >refuses to change design to remove metal from the frame like the USP and P320 have >bad reputation for FTE if you hold it wrong >MOS plates are absolute shit >safe action trigger being proven to be inferior to Sig’s and S&W’s in both being safe and actually resistant to weather >19X being exactly the reverse of what the market was asking for
And it’s one of the only guns that gets apologists for the extremely stupid design of needing to be fired for disassembly, despite the fact that if any other manufacturer tried this in the modern day they would be obliterated over social media for it.
Glock also failed to get the Army contract because Gaston quite literally believes his own shitty marketing. So he throws a tantrum in adding a shitty afterthought external safety and an expensive afterthought frame replacement system for the Army to buy, then throws another tantrum when the Army refuses to buy into that moronation.
If you need any more reason to hate them, they’re also pig worshipping homosexuals. Just look at their catalog and its all just sucking off cops because their military bid is dead.
They have bribed cops with everything from cash to strippers to buy their crap even though it is completely inappropriate for cops out of the box. NYPD had to get them to change the trigger weight. Note how few BLM cop shootings have happened there. No look everywhere else. Glock took a shit over the entire population of the United states and morons applauded.
Whats even worse is that we still have a bunch of sunken cost ridden buttholes who like to spam this fricking gun to everyone as a fits all solution, when neither the Army nor any relevant emerging training groups like GBRS use them.
And yes I know GBRS are a bunch of homosexuals but if all “meta” homosexuals care about is staying “relevant” than they will have to cope with their increasing popularity.
>Whats even worse is that we still have a bunch of sunken cost ridden buttholes who like to spam this fricking gun to everyone as a fits all solution, when neither the Army nor any relevant emerging training groups like GBRS use them.
The worst thing about it is that thousands, maybe tens of thousands of lives have been ruined by Glock in the USA and because the margin on the gun is so high they just pour money into legal and marketing and the whole think is silenced. Just like tobacco, just like ssris and prozac
>NYPD had to get them to change the trigger weight.
NYPD are actual fricking morons, why would you even bring this up? You're making the rest of your arguments look worse by mentioning this moronation.
, unnatural grip angle
Actually forces you to br more aggressive on the gun and have better recoil management
, then removing finger grooves is innovation
Yeah, even glock fans think glock never changes >>Pay $600 and then change everything
Mightve been true 10 years ago, but they've changed the factory sights to something usable >>Meh trigger
P320 triggers are way worse and it's something you can train around
leg, not a good gun for inexperienced shooters even though it is always a 1st suggestion
Literally just teach people the fundamentals of gun safety and they won't shoot themselves
sights
Already covered
guide rod
Not a problem unless you're trying to put 1000 rounds through it in 15 minutes
chamber
Never heard this complaint so I'm gonna take it as you're just b***hing to b***h
chamber >Never heard this complaint so I'm gonna take it as you're just b***hing to b***h
A fully supported chamber and proper recoil spring allows H&K's in 45 ACP to shoot 45 super and a steady diet of 45+P out of the box. Look into the "Glock smile"
>forces you to be more aggressive on the gun
A meaningless statement if I ever heard one. Probably from a noshoots, probably a noguns too. >plastic sights
Still come standard on every glock >teach people safety
They do at every cop academy and they still frick up
Firing to disassemble is ultra brainlet design and literally only glock gets away with it because of Gaston dick gobblers like you >unsupported chamber
See
chamber >Never heard this complaint so I'm gonna take it as you're just b***hing to b***h
A fully supported chamber and proper recoil spring allows H&K's in 45 ACP to shoot 45 super and a steady diet of 45+P out of the box. Look into the "Glock smile"
>Firing to disassemble is ultra brainlet design and literally only glock gets away with it because of Gaston dick gobblers like you
See that's the thing, if you do it right you don't fire. Because the gun isn't loaded.
How about you quit trying to disassemble loaded guns? Or just accept you are not intelligent enough to own any firearm without dying?
>literally every other manufacturer makes a gun that can be disassembled without firing >”Its not shitty design! you’re just not intelligent enough to own a glock!1!1!!1!1!”
Imagine being this much of an unpaid brand loyalist. Must be tough writing that on your phone when your other hand is massaging Gaston’s dick.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>without firing
Oh, there you go again, you don't fire it to disassemble it. Mag out and clear the chamber anon! >unpaid brand loyalist
I don't even own a glock, I just have never tried to clean or disassemble a loaded firearm before. It's pretty easy not to have a nice day, but stupid people will always kill themselves in stupid ways, then because they're incapable of learning, they will pretend the consequences of their stupidity are someone else's fault.
Tell me, why are you trying to normalize Black person behavior? What's in it for you?
2 years ago
Anonymous
You can’t disassemble a glock without firing it you fricking moron, even when theres nothing in the chamber. Its a bad design and trying to justify it pathetic.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>firing
See there you go again, that's wrong. You should definitely not be firing when you dissemble the gun. Take the bullets out first, then it won't fire.
I know this is going to be very difficult for you to understand, but firing is when gun go boom. Maybe your Black person ESL nogunz ass can understand that. Probably not though.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yeah, firing. The thing you NEED to do to disassemble the gun. You have no choice but to do that.
Any other gun doesn’t require that, so NDs are just not a possibility because the trigger isn’t involved in any way. But Gaston is a moron and so are you, so you think thats a good thing.
It doesn’t matter for someone like me, who has never had an ND, but for the thousands of times it has already happened we can blame both the user and bad design, as it is an impossibility during disassembly with any other pistol, even 100+ year designs like 1911s.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>firing
Nope, you don't fire a glock to disassemble it.
Of course you've never ND'd, nobody would let you touch a gun.
>grip angle
dumb meme for plebs >grip shit
dumb meme for plebs >trigger
Is better than most >glock leg
moronic people just shouldn't have guns, they'll shoot themselves no matter what they have, come to terms with it >plastic
dumb meme for plebs >unsupported chamber
you literally don't even know what this means. It applies to pretty much every handgun, ever.
Glock triggers are universally recognized as being bottom of the barrel for striker fired. >you literally don't even know what this means. It applies to pretty much every handgun, ever
Looks like you don’t either.
Stop talking
I can post pretty much any other pistol I want. P320, M&P, whatever. Only glockgays think having tolerances as loose as their buttholes is a good thing.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I can post pretty much any other pistol I want. P320, M&P, whatever.
None of those have a fully supported chamber.
And you can't post anything, because you don't own a gun, and don't know what chamber support means. You're just repeating words some other moron repeated without knowing what it means either. On and on forever.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Its a non factor in those 2. Whereas a glock should have a supported chamber.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>uh, the memes aren't about that gun so it doesn't matter how much chamber support it physically has
Exactly, I know. You have no idea what chamber support is or why it matters.
2 years ago
Anonymous
And neither do you, as you have made zero argument why it doesn’t matter.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>hurr neither do you
That's where you're wrong anon. >no argument
Almost every pistol ever made has a non-supported chamber. Not a problem. Don't load 10mm in a .40, gun doesn't blow up.
You don’t own a gun
Here's my USP .45 Tactical, a gun which doesn't have a fully supported chamber. Since supported chambers are a dumb meme for nogunz, this doesn't matter. It can from the factory fire .45 Super with no ill effects.
https://i.imgur.com/hDozh0c.jpg
cope nogunz peterpuffer
Yeah, see how when there's no bullet in the gun, it doesn't fire? That's how you're supposed to do it. Without firing. I know you're not too good at reading, like in general, much less reading English, but I'll keep going over it as many times as you need.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Nice goalpost moving.
>firing >Nope, you don't fire a glock to disassemble it.
Take your loss like a man glocktroony.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You're so fricking stupid it's painful, .45 super has thicker webbing than normal .45 which is why you can shoot it unsupported like a 10mm gun, meanwhile spicier .40S&W still blows out unsupported, forget 10mm in .40 gun.
You have to pull the trigger on a glock to take the gun down, you goalposts ran away, and a dick fell into your mouth.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Nice goalpost moving.
>firing >Nope, you don't fire a glock to disassemble it.
Take your loss like a man glocktroony.
>muh goalposts
I've been telling you for a very long time you do not fire a glock to disassemble it. You being unable to read is not my problem. How stupid are you exactly? I know reading is hard when you're a Black person, but do you really have to have it literally spelled out that many times before you get it?
>waaah still on muh chamber support
literally doesn't matter.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Firing and pulling the trigger are two different things, you would've known had your mother not dropped you on your head as a baby, also, you can disassembly a Glock without pulling the trigger, by dropping the striker with the slide back, you have to take the slide plate out, there is even an armorer's slide plate for that
When they were new in the market, they offered the same capabilities as any other 9mm with higher capacity and in a lighter platform
Now, they offered what has become the standard in the market, but with the track record of being the original and having like 40 years of service
>40 years of service
In who’s hands? The fat fricking incompetents who qual maybe twice a year at most? Can’t praise its “service life” and have this
Idk why you feel the need to blame cop shootings on the weapon and not the idiots handling them. Cops are wildly incompetent in almost every way imaginable, they're too stupid to handle a Glock
>Austran army >British army >Czech special forces > Estonia special forces > Finish defense forces > Georgia special forces >German special forces > Norwegian army >Polish army >Netherlands army >French army > Latvian army >Spanish special forces >Portuguese special forces > Luxembourg army > MonteBlack army >Greek special forces > US socom
Gee anon, I wonder in whose hands, I bet you are one of those morons that can put any county outside the US on a map
The only 3 of any relevance on that list are the French, British, and SOCOM. SOCOM has them in small numbers and was only chosen because of its weight, with operators admitting that sidearms were very rarely used and mostly just a lump of extra weight on the hip.
The British are an ever shrinking, politically corrupt army and the French are slowly becoming that way too. >county
Learn to proofread your shit
>SOCOM has them in small numbers
SOCOM just adopted the gen 5 17 with a new slide cut that's not in the market, also, nice of you moving the goal post form "on whose hands??" to "oh well, all the armies in Europe don't count since I can't really put those countries on a map"
2 years ago
Anonymous
Once again in ultra small numbers. Notice the jabroni with the optic cut and comp. That wouldn’t fly with regular Army and it’s honestly a choice per person if they care enough to all that between a glock or a sig. Either way you’re acting like glock was the only choice good enough for them, which isn’t the case you delusional ESL. >armies in Europe don't count since I can't really put those countries on a map
I’m assuming you’re some asshurt euroshitter since you won’t let this go. Rest assured that my geography skills are fine, if that will ease your flaming butthole from my verbal assault.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>to all that
to do all that*
Also notice the MCX in the hands of the butthole next to him. They also adopted those too, but I can assure you they aren’t dropping the M4 and are also first in line for the M5. This further proves my point of how little the choice of glock matters.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Rest assured that my geography skills are fine, if that will ease your flaming butthole from my verbal assault.
Meds, you are sperging again Leonard, the geography teacher can't hurt you now
>Single handedly ruins the handgun meta forever
Well their legal and marketing department has certainly made handguns much more dangerous and involved in a lot more accidental deaths, what's fun is they targetted corrupt police buyers so heavily with this completely inappropraite weapon they caused a massive wave of blue on blue shootings and accidental shootings that triggers a wave of destructive riots. Glock are fricking cancer, absolute thrash, the ssris of guns, created by a marketing department working with a leagl team to cover up the massive downsides, and of course lobbying and corruption to turn their product into a social problem that has undermined the police. It is hard to point at a single product that has done so much harm to America, yes, SSRIs maybe cigarettes. The wrong gun in the wrong job. Brought to you by glock. You won't hear about its defects or flaws because glock legal sealed the files as part of settlement
>they targetted corrupt police buyers so heavily with this completely inappropraite weapon they caused a massive wave of blue on blue shootings and accidental shootings that triggers a wave of destructive riots >You won't hear about its defects or flaws because glock legal sealed the files as part of settlement
This is actually information that is well known and established, why do you think the NYPD lawsuit happned. People like you are what you are. Drone that marketing gets poured into and then regurgitate it.
ARMED AND UNREADY
By Jeff Leen; Sari HorwitzNovember 18, 1998
Fourth of five articles
A decade ago, the District's Metropolitan Police Department placed one of the most advanced pistols in the world into the hands of hundreds of ill-prepared, undertrained police recruits.
The results have been unfortunate, according to police reports and internal department records examined by The Washington Post.
In the 10 years since D.C. police adopted the Glock 9mm to combat the growing firepower of drug dealers, there have been more than 120 accidental discharges of the handgun. Police officers have killed at least one citizen they didn't intend to kill and have wounded at least nine citizens they didn't intend to wound. Nineteen officers have shot themselves or other officers accidentally. At least eight victims or surviving relatives have sued the District alleging injuries from accidental discharges.
As long as shit like you breathes companies like british american tobacco, glock etc will thrive.
So you are not looking for examples of sources you could easily have found yourself anymore? Anyone who cheers for glocks and what they have done as a company is a fricking moron. So when some Black person mob starts rioting because a kid got zapped with one. Don't whatever you do ask glock for money because they bribed the PD into putting an inappropriate handgun in their policemens hands, no cheer because glocks profits just rose a tiny tiny bit. How much do you think glock paid gangsta rappers to mention glock? O yes they did.
That entire article is just kvetching about striker fired handguns without manual safeties as a concept because untrained morons were playing with their guns and shot themselves or left loaded guns in childrens' playpens.There were no fricking safety defects and nothing was "sealed". The case where Glock settled the dude literally shot his friend because he somehow pulled the trigger during the process of "unloading his glock" i.e. taking the mag out and pulling the slide back.
Do you work for glock marketing and legal yourself? Just wondering why you are deliberately obfuscating the incredibly bad fit of the glock with police work and the mountain of evidence and sources for that? Are you a shill for an Austrian gunmaker that profits from riots in the US and also contributes to causing them or are you just moronic?
I don't know why you're focusing on Glock and not stiker fired handguns without manual safeties in general. Would you not agree that VP9s, M&Ps, Walther PPQs/PDPs, CZ P10s, P320s, etc. would be MORE dangerous? I mean in addition to all having even lighter triggers than a glock, they also have fully wienered strikers, whereas on glocks, it's only partially wienered.I mean your position is that we need to go back to revolvers or DA wonder 9s in order to better protect black yoofs, right?
Idk why you feel the need to blame cop shootings on the weapon and not the idiots handling them. Cops are wildly incompetent in almost every way imaginable, they're too stupid to handle a Glock
>Cops are wildly incompetent in almost every way imaginable, they're too stupid to handle a Glock
Is that why glock poured bribes tiny rural police departments to get it carried by them then? Including strippers? How about the fact glock lega;l magically appears in court and gets the judge to seal any possible flaw to do with the gun as the first step in proceedings everytime one is used in a killing? You don;t know any of that though. You don;t care. You have eaten the poisoned lies and spin and will repeat it forever, Glock owes the American public money, a lot of money.
Glock poured bribes because while they aren't the best (truly, I think their marketing is all bullshit- I still think most people should own a Glock and practice with it because it's the most common handgun in America). They aren't so bad as to be so dangerous that they're to blame for the killings by cops (to include friendly fire). Their incompetence is what leads to that. The Glock is just not a very good design, it's not a nightmarishly flawed one as you present. Cops are currently lying about p320s, shooting themselves in the elgs and blaming it on the gun. The common factor here is the cops.
It is a gun like the AR15 that has a very high profit margin because of the shitty materials used. The actual design of teh glock though, everything about it especially its trigger made it inappropriate for cops. Thus teh NYPD special trigger after the legal case there but elsewhere it caused a mass wave of cops shooting each other and themselves and worse, far worse, accidental shootings of mainly Black folk. The cops responded with trying to cover this up dispite a lot of cops making the situation with glock public and being houded for it by their bribe taking superiors. So there have been nearly six years of summer riots in teh US as a consequence of glock and their marketing and legal, who appear to be modelled on big pharma and the tobacco industry, cover it up and sue. Hundreds of settlement cases by glock with cops have been sealed. The harm that glock has done to the USA is monumental.
Example of glock 'spin' PR which is so spammed by them it makes the vatniks look like beginers
"Why does the New York police department have 12-pound trigger pull?
The New York Police Department, in its infinite wisdom, has issued the boys in blue GLOCK, SIG and other handguns with a 12-pound trigger pull for the last century or so. The “reasoning” for that making the trigger pull so heavy cuts down on negligent discharges. Apparently adequately training the boys in blue never occurred to anyone at the NYPD."
Its not the trigger and gun that is basically unfit for police use and results in a spike in friendly fire and accidental shootings it is the TRAINING. Don't look here at this flawed inappropriate design which is good for target shooting but far to light a touch on a trigger for police work. Let's spin it. Glock are a fricking horrible company and anyone who loves guns or the USA should but something else. It is fine to have been scammed when you did not know better but now you do.
If you graphed the number of glocks in police hands against the number of accidental shootings of ghetto dwellers and subsequent riots you would see that the two are the same. Will glock pay? No cops and you will because e the courts are a haven for corruption. Glock should NEVER have been mass issued to police.
we dont
the glock was the second best thing to ever come out of austria
He's the third
>Singlehandedly reshapes the handgun meta
Ftfy
>yea lets just ignore the superior Austrian handgun that was decades ahead of the game
Sig copy
>SIG copied
Ftfy
Lol silly goose, beretta already made the M9A1 lmao.
The gen 1 was a jammomatic or so im told so it makes sense they would never really catch on. Shame since the gen 1 version is the most aesthetic by far. They may have fixed the reliability but that frick huge dust cover is so unnecessary.
Can somebody tell me why glocks are so good?
What do they do well?
Glocks suck
>Shitty, unnatural grip angle
>Adding, then removing finger grooves is innovation
>Pay $600 and then change everything
>Meh trigger
>Glock leg, not a good gun for inexperienced shooters even though it is always a 1st suggestion
>Plastic sights
>Plastic guide rod
>Unsupported chamber
Usually when I tell someone to get a glock its because Im kinda hoping they shoot themselves in the leg. Anyone I care about I suggest something with a hammer and dewienerer, yknow, something safe.
>yknow
Oh look the reditor reveals himself
Are you too Black personbrained to keep your finger off the trigger?
Not just that
>proprietary rail
>refuses to change design to remove metal from the frame like the USP and P320 have
>bad reputation for FTE if you hold it wrong
>MOS plates are absolute shit
>safe action trigger being proven to be inferior to Sig’s and S&W’s in both being safe and actually resistant to weather
>19X being exactly the reverse of what the market was asking for
And it’s one of the only guns that gets apologists for the extremely stupid design of needing to be fired for disassembly, despite the fact that if any other manufacturer tried this in the modern day they would be obliterated over social media for it.
Glock also failed to get the Army contract because Gaston quite literally believes his own shitty marketing. So he throws a tantrum in adding a shitty afterthought external safety and an expensive afterthought frame replacement system for the Army to buy, then throws another tantrum when the Army refuses to buy into that moronation.
If you need any more reason to hate them, they’re also pig worshipping homosexuals. Just look at their catalog and its all just sucking off cops because their military bid is dead.
They have bribed cops with everything from cash to strippers to buy their crap even though it is completely inappropriate for cops out of the box. NYPD had to get them to change the trigger weight. Note how few BLM cop shootings have happened there. No look everywhere else. Glock took a shit over the entire population of the United states and morons applauded.
Whats even worse is that we still have a bunch of sunken cost ridden buttholes who like to spam this fricking gun to everyone as a fits all solution, when neither the Army nor any relevant emerging training groups like GBRS use them.
And yes I know GBRS are a bunch of homosexuals but if all “meta” homosexuals care about is staying “relevant” than they will have to cope with their increasing popularity.
>Whats even worse is that we still have a bunch of sunken cost ridden buttholes who like to spam this fricking gun to everyone as a fits all solution, when neither the Army nor any relevant emerging training groups like GBRS use them.
The worst thing about it is that thousands, maybe tens of thousands of lives have been ruined by Glock in the USA and because the margin on the gun is so high they just pour money into legal and marketing and the whole think is silenced. Just like tobacco, just like ssris and prozac
The NYPD trigger is like 12 pounds to replicate a DAO revolver, because NYPD cops are too stupid to keep the booger hook off the bang switch.
>NYPD had to get them to change the trigger weight.
NYPD are actual fricking morons, why would you even bring this up? You're making the rest of your arguments look worse by mentioning this moronation.
, unnatural grip angle
Actually forces you to br more aggressive on the gun and have better recoil management
, then removing finger grooves is innovation
Yeah, even glock fans think glock never changes
>>Pay $600 and then change everything
Mightve been true 10 years ago, but they've changed the factory sights to something usable
>>Meh trigger
P320 triggers are way worse and it's something you can train around
leg, not a good gun for inexperienced shooters even though it is always a 1st suggestion
Literally just teach people the fundamentals of gun safety and they won't shoot themselves
sights
Already covered
guide rod
Not a problem unless you're trying to put 1000 rounds through it in 15 minutes
chamber
Never heard this complaint so I'm gonna take it as you're just b***hing to b***h
chamber
>Never heard this complaint so I'm gonna take it as you're just b***hing to b***h
A fully supported chamber and proper recoil spring allows H&K's in 45 ACP to shoot 45 super and a steady diet of 45+P out of the box. Look into the "Glock smile"
>forces you to be more aggressive on the gun
A meaningless statement if I ever heard one. Probably from a noshoots, probably a noguns too.
>plastic sights
Still come standard on every glock
>teach people safety
They do at every cop academy and they still frick up
Firing to disassemble is ultra brainlet design and literally only glock gets away with it because of Gaston dick gobblers like you
>unsupported chamber
See
>Firing to disassemble is ultra brainlet design and literally only glock gets away with it because of Gaston dick gobblers like you
See that's the thing, if you do it right you don't fire. Because the gun isn't loaded.
How about you quit trying to disassemble loaded guns? Or just accept you are not intelligent enough to own any firearm without dying?
>literally every other manufacturer makes a gun that can be disassembled without firing
>”Its not shitty design! you’re just not intelligent enough to own a glock!1!1!!1!1!”
Imagine being this much of an unpaid brand loyalist. Must be tough writing that on your phone when your other hand is massaging Gaston’s dick.
>without firing
Oh, there you go again, you don't fire it to disassemble it. Mag out and clear the chamber anon!
>unpaid brand loyalist
I don't even own a glock, I just have never tried to clean or disassemble a loaded firearm before. It's pretty easy not to have a nice day, but stupid people will always kill themselves in stupid ways, then because they're incapable of learning, they will pretend the consequences of their stupidity are someone else's fault.
Tell me, why are you trying to normalize Black person behavior? What's in it for you?
You can’t disassemble a glock without firing it you fricking moron, even when theres nothing in the chamber. Its a bad design and trying to justify it pathetic.
>firing
See there you go again, that's wrong. You should definitely not be firing when you dissemble the gun. Take the bullets out first, then it won't fire.
I know this is going to be very difficult for you to understand, but firing is when gun go boom. Maybe your Black person ESL nogunz ass can understand that. Probably not though.
Yeah, firing. The thing you NEED to do to disassemble the gun. You have no choice but to do that.
Any other gun doesn’t require that, so NDs are just not a possibility because the trigger isn’t involved in any way. But Gaston is a moron and so are you, so you think thats a good thing.
It doesn’t matter for someone like me, who has never had an ND, but for the thousands of times it has already happened we can blame both the user and bad design, as it is an impossibility during disassembly with any other pistol, even 100+ year designs like 1911s.
>firing
Nope, you don't fire a glock to disassemble it.
Of course you've never ND'd, nobody would let you touch a gun.
You don’t own a gun
cope nogunz peterpuffer
>grip angle
dumb meme for plebs
>grip shit
dumb meme for plebs
>trigger
Is better than most
>glock leg
moronic people just shouldn't have guns, they'll shoot themselves no matter what they have, come to terms with it
>plastic
dumb meme for plebs
>unsupported chamber
you literally don't even know what this means. It applies to pretty much every handgun, ever.
Glock triggers are universally recognized as being bottom of the barrel for striker fired.
>you literally don't even know what this means. It applies to pretty much every handgun, ever
Looks like you don’t either.
Stop talking
>stop talking
Oh boy, the little moron got upset.
Go on, post a pistol you have with a fully supported chamber and explain why it matters. I'll be waiting.
I can post pretty much any other pistol I want. P320, M&P, whatever. Only glockgays think having tolerances as loose as their buttholes is a good thing.
>I can post pretty much any other pistol I want. P320, M&P, whatever.
None of those have a fully supported chamber.
And you can't post anything, because you don't own a gun, and don't know what chamber support means. You're just repeating words some other moron repeated without knowing what it means either. On and on forever.
Its a non factor in those 2. Whereas a glock should have a supported chamber.
>uh, the memes aren't about that gun so it doesn't matter how much chamber support it physically has
Exactly, I know. You have no idea what chamber support is or why it matters.
And neither do you, as you have made zero argument why it doesn’t matter.
>hurr neither do you
That's where you're wrong anon.
>no argument
Almost every pistol ever made has a non-supported chamber. Not a problem. Don't load 10mm in a .40, gun doesn't blow up.
Here's my USP .45 Tactical, a gun which doesn't have a fully supported chamber. Since supported chambers are a dumb meme for nogunz, this doesn't matter. It can from the factory fire .45 Super with no ill effects.
Yeah, see how when there's no bullet in the gun, it doesn't fire? That's how you're supposed to do it. Without firing. I know you're not too good at reading, like in general, much less reading English, but I'll keep going over it as many times as you need.
Nice goalpost moving.
>firing
>Nope, you don't fire a glock to disassemble it.
Take your loss like a man glocktroony.
You're so fricking stupid it's painful, .45 super has thicker webbing than normal .45 which is why you can shoot it unsupported like a 10mm gun, meanwhile spicier .40S&W still blows out unsupported, forget 10mm in .40 gun.
You have to pull the trigger on a glock to take the gun down, you goalposts ran away, and a dick fell into your mouth.
>muh goalposts
I've been telling you for a very long time you do not fire a glock to disassemble it. You being unable to read is not my problem. How stupid are you exactly? I know reading is hard when you're a Black person, but do you really have to have it literally spelled out that many times before you get it?
>waaah still on muh chamber support
literally doesn't matter.
Firing and pulling the trigger are two different things, you would've known had your mother not dropped you on your head as a baby, also, you can disassembly a Glock without pulling the trigger, by dropping the striker with the slide back, you have to take the slide plate out, there is even an armorer's slide plate for that
Glockgays can't even come up with a coherent rebuttal. Imagine my shock.
20 years later, nogunz still repeat the same memes without understanding what they mean.
When they were new in the market, they offered the same capabilities as any other 9mm with higher capacity and in a lighter platform
Now, they offered what has become the standard in the market, but with the track record of being the original and having like 40 years of service
>40 years of service
In who’s hands? The fat fricking incompetents who qual maybe twice a year at most? Can’t praise its “service life” and have this
simultaneously.
>Austran army
>British army
>Czech special forces
> Estonia special forces
> Finish defense forces
> Georgia special forces
>German special forces
> Norwegian army
>Polish army
>Netherlands army
>French army
> Latvian army
>Spanish special forces
>Portuguese special forces
> Luxembourg army
> MonteBlack army
>Greek special forces
> US socom
Gee anon, I wonder in whose hands, I bet you are one of those morons that can put any county outside the US on a map
The only 3 of any relevance on that list are the French, British, and SOCOM. SOCOM has them in small numbers and was only chosen because of its weight, with operators admitting that sidearms were very rarely used and mostly just a lump of extra weight on the hip.
The British are an ever shrinking, politically corrupt army and the French are slowly becoming that way too.
>county
Learn to proofread your shit
>SOCOM has them in small numbers
SOCOM just adopted the gen 5 17 with a new slide cut that's not in the market, also, nice of you moving the goal post form "on whose hands??" to "oh well, all the armies in Europe don't count since I can't really put those countries on a map"
Once again in ultra small numbers. Notice the jabroni with the optic cut and comp. That wouldn’t fly with regular Army and it’s honestly a choice per person if they care enough to all that between a glock or a sig. Either way you’re acting like glock was the only choice good enough for them, which isn’t the case you delusional ESL.
>armies in Europe don't count since I can't really put those countries on a map
I’m assuming you’re some asshurt euroshitter since you won’t let this go. Rest assured that my geography skills are fine, if that will ease your flaming butthole from my verbal assault.
>to all that
to do all that*
Also notice the MCX in the hands of the butthole next to him. They also adopted those too, but I can assure you they aren’t dropping the M4 and are also first in line for the M5. This further proves my point of how little the choice of glock matters.
>Rest assured that my geography skills are fine, if that will ease your flaming butthole from my verbal assault.
Meds, you are sperging again Leonard, the geography teacher can't hurt you now
>Single handedly ruins the handgun meta forever
Well their legal and marketing department has certainly made handguns much more dangerous and involved in a lot more accidental deaths, what's fun is they targetted corrupt police buyers so heavily with this completely inappropraite weapon they caused a massive wave of blue on blue shootings and accidental shootings that triggers a wave of destructive riots. Glock are fricking cancer, absolute thrash, the ssris of guns, created by a marketing department working with a leagl team to cover up the massive downsides, and of course lobbying and corruption to turn their product into a social problem that has undermined the police. It is hard to point at a single product that has done so much harm to America, yes, SSRIs maybe cigarettes. The wrong gun in the wrong job. Brought to you by glock. You won't hear about its defects or flaws because glock legal sealed the files as part of settlement
>they targetted corrupt police buyers so heavily with this completely inappropraite weapon they caused a massive wave of blue on blue shootings and accidental shootings that triggers a wave of destructive riots
>You won't hear about its defects or flaws because glock legal sealed the files as part of settlement
This is actually information that is well known and established, why do you think the NYPD lawsuit happned. People like you are what you are. Drone that marketing gets poured into and then regurgitate it.
ARMED AND UNREADY
By Jeff Leen; Sari HorwitzNovember 18, 1998
Fourth of five articles
A decade ago, the District's Metropolitan Police Department placed one of the most advanced pistols in the world into the hands of hundreds of ill-prepared, undertrained police recruits.
The results have been unfortunate, according to police reports and internal department records examined by The Washington Post.
In the 10 years since D.C. police adopted the Glock 9mm to combat the growing firepower of drug dealers, there have been more than 120 accidental discharges of the handgun. Police officers have killed at least one citizen they didn't intend to kill and have wounded at least nine citizens they didn't intend to wound. Nineteen officers have shot themselves or other officers accidentally. At least eight victims or surviving relatives have sued the District alleging injuries from accidental discharges.
As long as shit like you breathes companies like british american tobacco, glock etc will thrive.
>Glock single handedly shoot 120 cops just by virtue of not being moron proof
Based
So you are not looking for examples of sources you could easily have found yourself anymore? Anyone who cheers for glocks and what they have done as a company is a fricking moron. So when some Black person mob starts rioting because a kid got zapped with one. Don't whatever you do ask glock for money because they bribed the PD into putting an inappropriate handgun in their policemens hands, no cheer because glocks profits just rose a tiny tiny bit. How much do you think glock paid gangsta rappers to mention glock? O yes they did.
I'm not the same anon sperg
It was 19 cops, and 10 civvies, but still
That entire article is just kvetching about striker fired handguns without manual safeties as a concept because untrained morons were playing with their guns and shot themselves or left loaded guns in childrens' playpens.There were no fricking safety defects and nothing was "sealed". The case where Glock settled the dude literally shot his friend because he somehow pulled the trigger during the process of "unloading his glock" i.e. taking the mag out and pulling the slide back.
Do you work for glock marketing and legal yourself? Just wondering why you are deliberately obfuscating the incredibly bad fit of the glock with police work and the mountain of evidence and sources for that? Are you a shill for an Austrian gunmaker that profits from riots in the US and also contributes to causing them or are you just moronic?
I don't know why you're focusing on Glock and not stiker fired handguns without manual safeties in general. Would you not agree that VP9s, M&Ps, Walther PPQs/PDPs, CZ P10s, P320s, etc. would be MORE dangerous? I mean in addition to all having even lighter triggers than a glock, they also have fully wienered strikers, whereas on glocks, it's only partially wienered.I mean your position is that we need to go back to revolvers or DA wonder 9s in order to better protect black yoofs, right?
Idk why you feel the need to blame cop shootings on the weapon and not the idiots handling them. Cops are wildly incompetent in almost every way imaginable, they're too stupid to handle a Glock
>Cops are wildly incompetent in almost every way imaginable, they're too stupid to handle a Glock
Is that why glock poured bribes tiny rural police departments to get it carried by them then? Including strippers? How about the fact glock lega;l magically appears in court and gets the judge to seal any possible flaw to do with the gun as the first step in proceedings everytime one is used in a killing? You don;t know any of that though. You don;t care. You have eaten the poisoned lies and spin and will repeat it forever, Glock owes the American public money, a lot of money.
Glock poured bribes because while they aren't the best (truly, I think their marketing is all bullshit- I still think most people should own a Glock and practice with it because it's the most common handgun in America). They aren't so bad as to be so dangerous that they're to blame for the killings by cops (to include friendly fire). Their incompetence is what leads to that. The Glock is just not a very good design, it's not a nightmarishly flawed one as you present. Cops are currently lying about p320s, shooting themselves in the elgs and blaming it on the gun. The common factor here is the cops.
Hell ya Schizo posting
It is a gun like the AR15 that has a very high profit margin because of the shitty materials used. The actual design of teh glock though, everything about it especially its trigger made it inappropriate for cops. Thus teh NYPD special trigger after the legal case there but elsewhere it caused a mass wave of cops shooting each other and themselves and worse, far worse, accidental shootings of mainly Black folk. The cops responded with trying to cover this up dispite a lot of cops making the situation with glock public and being houded for it by their bribe taking superiors. So there have been nearly six years of summer riots in teh US as a consequence of glock and their marketing and legal, who appear to be modelled on big pharma and the tobacco industry, cover it up and sue. Hundreds of settlement cases by glock with cops have been sealed. The harm that glock has done to the USA is monumental.
Example of glock 'spin' PR which is so spammed by them it makes the vatniks look like beginers
"Why does the New York police department have 12-pound trigger pull?
The New York Police Department, in its infinite wisdom, has issued the boys in blue GLOCK, SIG and other handguns with a 12-pound trigger pull for the last century or so. The “reasoning” for that making the trigger pull so heavy cuts down on negligent discharges. Apparently adequately training the boys in blue never occurred to anyone at the NYPD."
Its not the trigger and gun that is basically unfit for police use and results in a spike in friendly fire and accidental shootings it is the TRAINING. Don't look here at this flawed inappropriate design which is good for target shooting but far to light a touch on a trigger for police work. Let's spin it. Glock are a fricking horrible company and anyone who loves guns or the USA should but something else. It is fine to have been scammed when you did not know better but now you do.
Take your meds nogunz Black person
If you graphed the number of glocks in police hands against the number of accidental shootings of ghetto dwellers and subsequent riots you would see that the two are the same. Will glock pay? No cops and you will because e the courts are a haven for corruption. Glock should NEVER have been mass issued to police.
>handgun meta
>meta
you talk like a gay and your shits all fricked. go have a nice day OP
Go check out the Sig Sauer reddit page if you want to see cringe.
Nuke Austria. It’s the only way