side-by-side or over-under???

whats the best location for a copilot?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Over-under is better for streamlining the wienerpit on smaller jets
    Side to side is better for handjob availability

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Just do a reach-around

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        With modern technology and super high altitude space places a glass wienerpit isn't necessary. The pilot and copilot could 69.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      you've never spooned with a man, huh

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Optimal tip-to-tip efficiency

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Side to side is better for handjob availability
      For 50 million it should have a robotic arm with a Fleshlight attached and a VR headset.

  2. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    best looking puccia jet

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >best looking puccia jet
      it might actually be the ugliest of all-time. it looks like a prolapsed duck.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        kys.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I really like the style of this, its a weird looking kind of cool like the f111

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Agreed

  3. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Idk put Prez wherever I just want her with me.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Adding a copilot was genius. Not adding more 2 seaters was a crime.
      Something like a Strike Eagle or Su-30 would have been a decent upgrade in stats over the F-14D, and they had every chance to make one of the several fictional aircraft a 2 seater.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        There's a mod that does exactly this and lets you enjoy Prez's presence in any aircraft, though she may not be returning for a sequel if there ever is one due to obsessed fans.
        Like it got really, REALLY bad.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          What do you mean it got really bad? It didnt seems different to any other videogame thing.

  4. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Side by side is better for crew coordination because you can point but at the cost of higher drag.

  5. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    face to face, docking on the front, foamed up on the back

  6. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Back to back.
    Bring back tail gunners

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Back to back.
      You mean "Ass to Ass"

  7. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    SU-34 is such a cursed aircraft. They morphed a fighter jet into a bomber. It's like something an AI would generate.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >They morphed a fighter jet into a bomber.
      The Su-27 is bigger than a B-17

  8. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think side by side, because it lets you try each other's sandwiches during lunch, plus you can have a good chat and waggle your hands about for emphasis.

  9. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I want offset tandem to finally be a thing

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Literally worst of both worlds, and an alien eats your head on top of that.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        but it looks cool

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Brits kind of did it already.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        The mosquito had a similar thing going, but only very slightly

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Frick ergonomics and the radar(?) operators neck in particular!

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >British longbowman: my body is permanently changed from the unending pursuit of accuracy and distance using this fearsome weapon.
            >British mosquito co-pilot : lol same

  10. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    In somebody else's plane.

  11. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Over-under for fast fighter jets looking for trouble so that each crewperson has unobstructed views to both sides.

    Side-by-side for slow ground attack planes doing strafing or bombing runs for better crew cooperation and so that there are two sets of eyes looking forward & down for targets & friendlies, and each can point "right there" at whatever... plus they can pass blunts back & forth easily sitting next to each other.

  12. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    If the Aardvark is wrong, I don't want to be right.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I have a question regarding the Aardvark (and other variable-sweep wing aircraft):
      Do the external weapon stations rotate when the wing gets swept back or are they fixed and point slightly outward/inwards depending on the wing configuration?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        they rotate.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Some do, some don't.
        On the F-111 only the inner pylons rotate, the Tornado has all wing pylons pivot to match the wing sweep.
        Su-24 has the main load carrying pylon on the wing inside the pivot point of the wing and only a light outer pylon for R-60 AAMs and other light stores further out that rotates with the wing sweep.
        Mig-23/27 has only the stations for long range ferry tanks on the sweeping part of the wing and are limited to locking the wings extended with these tanks fitted.
        F-14 has no rotating stores as the pylons are suspended off the wing glove inside of the pivot point.

  13. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Snip your copilots harness at the top before mission
    >Do High G right barrel rolls in flight
    >Copilots head ends up in your crotch
    >"While you're down there, Sergei..."

  14. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    How about laying down ?

  15. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    there is no reason for a fighter to have a copilot in the current year

  16. 10 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >now with double the roadhead capacity for those long tours away from the missus

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      4 seater Intruder?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'd say lurk more, but you need to lurk like wikipedia or something dude. How do you not know about the prowler?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Take a closer look at that snout!
      Why is there a nuclear sign on it?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        To differentiate an EA-6 from a plain A-6

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          "The canopy had a shading of gold to protect the crew against the radio emissions that the electronic warfare equipment produces."

  17. 10 months ago
    Anonymous
  18. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    side by side but with more privacy

  19. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    russians obviously pick side by side so the copilot can suck the pilot's wiener. Typical russian things

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *