Adding a copilot was genius. Not adding more 2 seaters was a crime.
Something like a Strike Eagle or Su-30 would have been a decent upgrade in stats over the F-14D, and they had every chance to make one of the several fictional aircraft a 2 seater.
There's a mod that does exactly this and lets you enjoy Prez's presence in any aircraft, though she may not be returning for a sequel if there ever is one due to obsessed fans.
Like it got really, REALLY bad.
I think side by side, because it lets you try each other's sandwiches during lunch, plus you can have a good chat and waggle your hands about for emphasis.
>British longbowman: my body is permanently changed from the unending pursuit of accuracy and distance using this fearsome weapon. >British mosquito co-pilot : lol same
Over-under for fast fighter jets looking for trouble so that each crewperson has unobstructed views to both sides.
Side-by-side for slow ground attack planes doing strafing or bombing runs for better crew cooperation and so that there are two sets of eyes looking forward & down for targets & friendlies, and each can point "right there" at whatever... plus they can pass blunts back & forth easily sitting next to each other.
I have a question regarding the Aardvark (and other variable-sweep wing aircraft):
Do the external weapon stations rotate when the wing gets swept back or are they fixed and point slightly outward/inwards depending on the wing configuration?
Some do, some don't.
On the F-111 only the inner pylons rotate, the Tornado has all wing pylons pivot to match the wing sweep.
Su-24 has the main load carrying pylon on the wing inside the pivot point of the wing and only a light outer pylon for R-60 AAMs and other light stores further out that rotates with the wing sweep.
Mig-23/27 has only the stations for long range ferry tanks on the sweeping part of the wing and are limited to locking the wings extended with these tanks fitted.
F-14 has no rotating stores as the pylons are suspended off the wing glove inside of the pivot point.
>Snip your copilots harness at the top before mission >Do High G right barrel rolls in flight >Copilots head ends up in your crotch >"While you're down there, Sergei..."
Over-under is better for streamlining the cockpit on smaller jets
Side to side is better for handjob availability
Just do a reach-around
With modern technology and super high altitude space places a glass cockpit isn't necessary. The pilot and copilot could 69.
you've never spooned with a man, huh
Optimal tip-to-tip efficiency
>Side to side is better for handjob availability
For 50 million it should have a robotic arm with a fleshlight attached and a VR headset.
best looking puccia jet
>best looking puccia jet
it might actually be the ugliest of all-time. it looks like a prolapsed duck.
kys.
I really like the style of this, its a weird looking kind of cool like the f111
Agreed
Idk put Prez wherever I just want her with me.
Adding a copilot was genius. Not adding more 2 seaters was a crime.
Something like a Strike Eagle or Su-30 would have been a decent upgrade in stats over the F-14D, and they had every chance to make one of the several fictional aircraft a 2 seater.
There's a mod that does exactly this and lets you enjoy Prez's presence in any aircraft, though she may not be returning for a sequel if there ever is one due to obsessed fans.
Like it got really, REALLY bad.
What do you mean it got really bad? It didnt seems different to any other videogame thing.
Side by side is better for crew coordination because you can point but at the cost of higher drag.
face to face, docking on the front, foamed up on the back
Back to back.
Bring back tail gunners
>Back to back.
You mean "Ass to Ass"
SU-34 is such a cursed aircraft. They morphed a fighter jet into a bomber. It's like something an AI would generate.
>They morphed a fighter jet into a bomber.
The Su-27 is bigger than a B-17
I think side by side, because it lets you try each other's sandwiches during lunch, plus you can have a good chat and waggle your hands about for emphasis.
I want offset tandem to finally be a thing
Literally worst of both worlds, and an alien eats your head on top of that.
but it looks cool
Brits kind of did it already.
The mosquito had a similar thing going, but only very slightly
Fuck ergonomics and the radar(?) operators neck in particular!
>British longbowman: my body is permanently changed from the unending pursuit of accuracy and distance using this fearsome weapon.
>British mosquito co-pilot : lol same
In somebody else's plane.
Over-under for fast fighter jets looking for trouble so that each crewperson has unobstructed views to both sides.
Side-by-side for slow ground attack planes doing strafing or bombing runs for better crew cooperation and so that there are two sets of eyes looking forward & down for targets & friendlies, and each can point "right there" at whatever... plus they can pass blunts back & forth easily sitting next to each other.
If the Aardvark is wrong, I don't want to be right.
I have a question regarding the Aardvark (and other variable-sweep wing aircraft):
Do the external weapon stations rotate when the wing gets swept back or are they fixed and point slightly outward/inwards depending on the wing configuration?
they rotate.
Some do, some don't.
On the F-111 only the inner pylons rotate, the Tornado has all wing pylons pivot to match the wing sweep.
Su-24 has the main load carrying pylon on the wing inside the pivot point of the wing and only a light outer pylon for R-60 AAMs and other light stores further out that rotates with the wing sweep.
Mig-23/27 has only the stations for long range ferry tanks on the sweeping part of the wing and are limited to locking the wings extended with these tanks fitted.
F-14 has no rotating stores as the pylons are suspended off the wing glove inside of the pivot point.
>Snip your copilots harness at the top before mission
>Do High G right barrel rolls in flight
>Copilots head ends up in your crotch
>"While you're down there, Sergei..."
How about laying down ?
there is no reason for a fighter to have a copilot in the current year
>now with double the roadhead capacity for those long tours away from the missus
4 seater Intruder?
I'd say lurk more, but you need to lurk like wikipedia or something dude. How do you not know about the prowler?
Take a closer look at that snout!
Why is there a nuclear sign on it?
To differentiate an EA-6 from a plain A-6
"The canopy had a shading of gold to protect the crew against the radio emissions that the electronic warfare equipment produces."
side by side but with more privacy
russians obviously pick side by side so the copilot can suck the pilot's cock. Typical russian things