Should terminator robots be legal to own by normal citizens? Posted on March 16, 2023 by PrepHole Contributor Should terminator robots be legal to own by normal citizens?
No. They're traps. If you need to kill somebody it should be you that pulls the trigger or at least pushes the button, 1:1 for each person you shoot. Be it a spike pit or a terminator, automated killing without human direction isn't and shouldn't be legal. Man up and shoot them yourself, confirming the target.
Even if yes, you'd be guilty of murder when (not if) an automated killing machine killed someone you weren't entitled to kill, and then you get the death penalty after, that still doesn't bring them back. There isn't any justification for not insisting that when justifiable homicide is needed a human be in charge of making the call.
Ordering a robot to kill someone is essentially the same thing as pulling the trigger on a gun. Guns are still legal to own, though.
There's really no good reason to outright ban humanoid robots, especially considering how useful they'd be in pretty much any task you can think of, and any humanoid robot is going to be able to use weapons designed for human hands.
>Ordering a robot to kill someone is essentially the same thing as pulling the trigger on a gun.
No it's not, at least not in a "terminator" sense. You're not in that specific time, place and moment specifically directing instantaneous killing power onto one specific person. Automated stuff that decides to kill on its own based on set criteria is a different category.
Now a remote gun where you aimed yourself with a live feed and it shot one bullet per button hit might pass muster (legal issues around justifiable homicide and "immediate threat" aside). But an autonomous system that will just go out and kill on its own in the indeterminate possibly distant future is totally different, again no different then a spike pit or tripwire activated swinging blade or gas trap or whatever.
BTW does any of this trap stuff apply to dangerous animals? If I keep a pit bull that will maul a stranger and some idiot breaks into my house while I'm not there and gets himself killed, am I responsible for that?
You'll have to check your local law. Animals are a historical exception to traps in terms of simple ownership, and MOST laws around them are limited liability afaik, you're required to take "reasonable measures" to secure and control your animal. Having it in an unfenced yard with some shitty leather leash it chews through wouldn't cut it for example. Or if some weak woman has one and she is physically unable to restrain it even leashed (let alone takes it unleashed because POOR WIDDLE DIDDUMS WOULDN'T HURT A FLY!).
But safely locked inside of your house would certainly meet that bar regardless of animal. But I'm not going to claim without research that there is nowhere that isn't strict liability. Hell in some cuck countries apparently you can get in trouble if a burglar injures themself in your house on something "unsafe".
>or at least pushes the button
I pushed the power button on my Terminator
You know, the other day I was having a conversation with my GF about the problems inherent to the "consensual non-consensual" fetish her one friend has, and it got me thinking about robots, and their inevitable use in sexual activities, right?
So it dawns on me that eventually, someone kind of fucked in the head like my GF's friend, who wants to be raped in a safe fashion, will probably program a robot to physically restrain them and rape them on purpose.
That's going to open such an insane can of worms it will be unbelievable.
People will probably program robots to go out and rape people. In their homes, in the supermarket, in traffic, etc., there will be cases of a robot just grabbing someone in public, tearing their clothes off, and fucking the shit out of them.
Men and women will have to fear all robots in day to day life, not knowing whether or not one will suddenly physically overpower them and rape them to death.
>Come home to my pod
>See a model 2043 thugminator hanging around the kitchen in just a bathrobe
>Smoking a spark plug
>Peek into the bedroom, wife drilled to death
>Leaking oil out of all her orifices
>''Haha just following orders you fucking meatbag''
I think we both know who gave those orders anon.
>not having your own personal guard of terminators that follows you everywhere
>everyone has a horde of robots following them
>the robots are there to protect you from robot rape
>giant team robot battles start becoming commonplace
>if your robot escorts are defeated in robot v. robot combat, you get your asshole turned inside out in public
So Pokemon that ended up with the loser getting raped?
Isn't that pretty much every pokemon hentai plot ever?
>Isn't that pretty much every pokemon hentai plot ever?
...is it? Anon I can't honestly say I've consumed ANY pokemon hentai.
Violent combative poke-rape is a common thematic element?
Nah I'm just half joking.
Yes, the "Sex as replacement of money reward" is a thing in Pokemon hentai. But there's also a lot more of shipping hentai. Ash really go around.
Also lightened up PrepHole, you guys are taking things too seriously.
>nah guys it was a joke
What with moral high ground PrepHole
You guys are far more high strung than PrepHole
We /toy/ just having fun. Stop acting like my grandpa.
>nooo you can't be weirded out by me fapping to bestiality involving children
Skip church and just end it
We have standards here
It's almost never that. But since in the games a defeated trainer pays the victor a small amount of money as a prize, it's a pretty common gag in it to have them go "but I don't have money," then cut right to a mating press.
Anon you just said a lot about yourself with a few words. Touch grass
Consider going to church
The hypothetical is flawed. Most users of sexbots would be men, and men want to rape, not be raped. So the situation would only rarely arise.
Serial killers are also rather rare yet they exist. Most don't just kill but torture, rape or humiliate their victims. What's to say one won't have a robot do it for them?
>men want to rape, not be raped
>the situation would only rarely arise.
Anon, I want you to just take a second, okay?
Just lean back in your chair, and think about the problems Russia has, where they are completely unable to stop their own soldiers from raping EACH OTHER.
Now think about whether or not men would program robots to rape other men just for the hell of it.
>walking down the street, minding my own business
>a robot bursts out of the nearby lake, and runs towards me full speed
>it tackles me to the ground, pins me by the wrists, and with it's prehensile robo-dong, rips my pants clean off
>robot announces: "successful capture of final meatbag for daily rape quota" loudly
>see spiderholes open in nearby lawn
>local homeless population emerges from subteranean hidey holes, laughing, smiling
>they've been hiding from the robo predator, waiting
>they all gather round, waiting
>they know when the robot finishes and shuts down, it will unfold like an accordion and produce delicious Sliders and Sriracha Shrimp Nibblers
This surreal glimpse into the future brought to you by White Castle™
But anon, as a robosadist, I am the one who want to rape robot until it's falling apart to pieces.
Singularists are the lowest scum on earth, there is certain sub in certain social media we use to insult each other about the Singularity, one of the main proponents is a guy who also asks and gives recommendation on guro hentai, he apparently believes with the singularity the government will pay him to stay alive so he can dedidate forever to his /d/eviancy.
>robo wives will have guns too, and be proficient in their use
Is there any way in which they will not utterly MOG bio females?
You can take Terminator-Chan from my cold dead hands you statist bootlicker.
yes, I want my own robot army
>Inb4 buying Scud the Disposable Assassin robots from vending machines
No. Only the government and private criminals should own terminator robots.
>look of embarrassed dismay
Sigh. Why am I like this.
Yes, unless they operate without human supervision in which case they are a booby trap and therefore illegal
UMP45 is not an IOP manufacture doll
>UMP45 is not an IOP manufacture doll
i just want a robot to coom in, i don't care who makes it.
She cannot install the item. Frankly, I doubt any manufacturer would make a compatible module other than for a custom order at great cost, considering how difficult it was for her to procure a replacement arm.
boo, stop ruining my fun
Dolls are nothing but masturbation aids
already illegal and regulated as machine guns /thread
Rather have a cute t-doll with the terminator synthetic flesh and the proper "attachments". Elite home security, personal maid, professional chauffeur, and sex/BJs on demand.