Shit hit the fan so bad they're actaully sending in the Aramata

https://twitter.com/DefenceHQ/status/1615955033668853760/photo/1

  1. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Hello, reddit.

  2. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    There's gonna be more Leopard 2's in Ukraine than T14s in a few weeks, I bet my left nut in it

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      I demand that the nut in question be deposited at an escrow until the bet is resolved.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      There's already a good chance there's at least as many leopards in Ukraine right now than there are Armata tanks in the world.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >Already been spotted before they even left Puccia
      These things are going to be followed so closely by NATO intelligence they're going to turn into smoke the fucking nanosecond they enter Ukraine's effective strike range
      If I was a crewman for one of these I'd do anything to get out of it, up to and including hacking off my own limbs

      There will be more Leopard 2's in Ukraine than there are functional T-14's in the world soon enough
      Not to mention Challengers and eventually Abrams

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Hell CAPTURE at least one of them. Disable the treads and tow it away.

        It will make quite the trophy for Ukraine.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          ,
          I know there's basically 0 chance because they're never gonna be anywhere near the front, but imagine
          >wikipedia page for t-14 armata
          >current operators:
          >russia
          >ukraine

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Alternatively:
          >capture it
          >release video stating that you've tested it and it's actually shit (regardless of whether that's actually true)
          >follow statement with footage of it being destroyed as a target for ATGM training
          >russophone internet is inundated with coping and seething

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            ,
            I know there's basically 0 chance because they're never gonna be anywhere near the front, but imagine
            >wikipedia page for t-14 armata
            >current operators:
            >russia
            >ukraine

            STOP I can only get so erect

  3. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >the two tanks were formed up in column
    can you really call it a column if it's two tanks

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Anon, please, it's all they can afford.

  4. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >2 (Two)

  5. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    how the fuck can they tell they're T14s if the image resolution makes them resemble C&C sprites

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      MoDs usually decreases resolution of satelite images to hide true capacity. Remember the shit Trump got for tweeting classified images?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Still amazes me we actually got that picture. NRO is operating some black magic up in space.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >Thinking that Trump tweeted even a fraction of the resolution the NRO has when he effectively took a photo of a functional resolution image.
        >NRO has been able to read license plates since the 80s.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        The president tweeted declassified images. He declassified them by tweeting them he doesn't have to do declassification paperwork like plebs.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          It's true, the president can even declassify documents by thinking about it really hard.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Retard alert

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          This anon is right, it's common for presidents to release classified intelligence, and then retroactively declassify them with their mind.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        supposedly the most surprising thing about this image to satellite nerds was not the resolution, but the angle at which it’s taken. i read somewhere that it’s likely heavily enhanced by AI, in the same way Google Pixel’s cameras are capable of zooming in on live images without actually having a zoom lens.

        like it takes artifacts from the image and can zoom in to get even closer by running it through algorithms to produce the new and more granular image, in real time. so i guess theoretically this technology would allow NRO satellites to continuously improve just by software updates.

        you could imagine that it would save a lot of money by not needing to launch a new satellite every few years just to get a slightly better resolution.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          So CSI zoom and enhance shit is real?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            It unironically has been for a few years now.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            It unironically has been for a few years now.

            It is, at least if you have the NSA's massive black budget that can fund specialized AI enhancement software.

  6. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    You can do better.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Came here to post this.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        NAFO will never recover from this
        mmm roast piggies *~~))

  7. 1 week ago
    T-I-G-E-R-S

    Can't be, both of them??!

  8. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    they needed a propaganda victory since NATO is sending tanks and IFV's.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      This.
      On paper, nothing, including a T-90S, competes with a Chally 2.
      Russia needs to theoretically have a comparable system in operation for domestic purposes. Videos will be filmed but that thing ain't getting anywhere near the front.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        the t90s is the export mod tourist. the challenger or leopard or abrams will blow up like any t64. this isnt a marvel movie where the badass supertank comes in and saves the day

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >better armor
          >better ammunition
          >better gun
          >better optics
          >better design of tank
          >better positioning inside of tank
          >better crews
          >better logistics team
          >better infantry support
          >better air support
          vs
          >better at killing their crew
          lol

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous
  9. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Oh boy, the next may 9th parade is gonna look interesting.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >the next may 9th parade
      Oh boy.
      I can't imagine that they'd actually hold one this year. How could they possibly justify it?

      If there's no materiel on display, it's just going to make them look shit and like the army has collapsed.

      If they do have any materiel then you have to ask why it's not on the front where it would be useful?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >If they do have any materiel then you have to ask why it's not on the front where it would be useful?
        You have to remember that the average Russian probably thinks they have enough tanks to spare.

  10. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    daily reminder that there has still been zero photographic evidence of more than two functioning T14s existing at the same time
    >original victory day parade where a third one caught on fire
    >training video from several months ago
    >this satellite image

  11. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Russia will win.
    Globohomo is the devil.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *