the victim was the child that was placed in a dangerous situation due to the neglect of his caregivers.
the 6 year old did not know how to operate the firearm and did not exercise basic firearms safety by pointing the gun at his own face multiple times.
The lesson here isn't that kids shouldn't have guns, its that children need to be properly trained with firearms. If your 7 year old can't hit a man sized target at 400 meters and not flag anyone in the process, they shouldn't have access to firearms
Saw that live, after it was learned the gun was a 2 tone S&W of some sort with a 17 round mag, the cop kept telling everyone if that gun was chambered that 3 year old (who's the size of an 8 year old mind you) could have easily killed 17 people with it. Really absurd situation.
>the cop kept telling everyone if that gun was chambered that 3 year old (who's the size of an 8 year old mind you) could have easily killed 17 people with it
It's only so low BECAUSE it was a two year. It was a MILITARY CLASS sidearm with war rounds, each one could kill 2-4 people if they were lined up as is VERY common in cities and playgrounds! In the hands of a right wing militant that gun could MOW DOWN dozens of children and pregnant mothers.
>JUST LOOK AT WHAT THEY WONT LETS US DO ANYMORE >*points to a screen that shows an unsupervised toddler handling and pointing a real firearm in public* >THEY ARE TRYING TO HOLD PARENTS ACCOUNTABLE FOR CHILD ENDANGERMENT!!! WHAT IS NEXT???? ENFORCING PUBLIC SAFETY AND ENCOURAGING IDEAS OF RESPONSIBLE GUN OWNERSHIP!?!?!!??? WE LIVE IN A POLICE STATE!!!!!! WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!
There should unironically be a test for gun ownership that involves essay writing, critical thinking, and general knowledge. An even harder test should be required to vote.
Over half of the general public is too stupid to have a say in the affairs of the nation and how things are run. Universal suffrage was a mistake and the concept of universal rights is wrong.
>Babby's first philosopher >Hurr Durr the government should get to issue tests to decide who has Natural Rights
No way fag. As I said, not up for debate.
Our problem is not universal rights, it’s people whose sole aim is to rob the general public if their rights by keeping them ignorant through indoctrination systems and institutions.
No our problem is those who abuse our rights like gun nuts. Nobody needs more than a single action revolver like the founding persons of penile identity used to defeat british conservatives.
Alright, that's fair.
Leaving an unattended 3 year old with a loaded firearm would 100% fall under "places the dependent in a situation that endangers the dependent's life or health".
That's why we have functioning, gun free based societies in Europe, where the constitutional right to life outweighs the wish of tards to play with guns.
you gays keep importing morons and your functioning society will turn into a hell scape with lack of guns being a serious concern when you stick you lilly white asshole out for some turk or moron to rape.
Western Europeans live in a little artificial bubble granted to them by the United States of America. It is because of them that you could larp as some type of evolved human living in a progressive utopia.
You are like children on their breasts, they protect you from that big scary world full of big scary guns and people wishing to do you harm. Watch your tone when you speak to your father.
Gubbermint has no right to disarm a young firearms enthusiast. Looks like a reasonable EDC for kindergarten. More guns = more safety, they are putting that kid at risk.
*sigh*
N
the kid isn't black you fucking moron
Dad was see
-OT
REDEEM
he cute
What race was he?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11644517/Father-toddler-seen-waving-GUN-live-TV-charged-felony-child-neglect.html
>libertarians will defend the state arresting someone for a victimless crime
What?
Don't tread on me, please tread on thten over there.
no step on snek pl0x
That snek was very problematic please understand please.
the victim was the child that was placed in a dangerous situation due to the neglect of his caregivers.
the 6 year old did not know how to operate the firearm and did not exercise basic firearms safety by pointing the gun at his own face multiple times.
The lesson here isn't that kids shouldn't have guns, its that children need to be properly trained with firearms. If your 7 year old can't hit a man sized target at 400 meters and not flag anyone in the process, they shouldn't have access to firearms
Well thank God it was only 9mm so it's not like it would have done any real damage if it was actually loaded.
Saw that live, after it was learned the gun was a 2 tone S&W of some sort with a 17 round mag, the cop kept telling everyone if that gun was chambered that 3 year old (who's the size of an 8 year old mind you) could have easily killed 17 people with it. Really absurd situation.
>the cop kept telling everyone if that gun was chambered that 3 year old (who's the size of an 8 year old mind you) could have easily killed 17 people with it
It's only so low BECAUSE it was a two year. It was a MILITARY CLASS sidearm with war rounds, each one could kill 2-4 people if they were lined up as is VERY common in cities and playgrounds! In the hands of a right wing militant that gun could MOW DOWN dozens of children and pregnant mothers.
>uncle felon
>storing gun for brother, probably another felon
>plus toddler
>Indiana
Where all races can unite in the shared experiences of being broke, doing meth and modding vehicles in the most retarded way possible
Y-yeah Indiana and Ohio suck, not like Michichads
Ohio has Constitutional Carry and turns more red by the day, you heathenous lake devil. Be quiet, loser of the Toledo War.
It wasn't real. The whole thing was scripted in order to sway public opinion. A literal false flag.
>PrepHole will defend leaving a loaded gun where an unsupervised 3 year old can access it
The 2nd amendment doesn't require you to defend every dumb-assed thing ever done with a gun
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
moron moron moron moron
I HATE THE GOVERNMENT
I LOVE MY SCARY BLACK ASSAULT RIFLES
>this is what redditors think PrepHole is like
Should be named Opel because she weighs as much as one
her name should be oval because she is shaped like one
More like No, pal.
Holy shit is that trigglypuff?
Correct
You're right. That three year old might have dropped the gun on the concrete and damaged it.
>Indiana
>beach grove
The kid doesn't have a chance.
>JUST LOOK AT WHAT THEY WONT LETS US DO ANYMORE
>*points to a screen that shows an unsupervised toddler handling and pointing a real firearm in public*
>THEY ARE TRYING TO HOLD PARENTS ACCOUNTABLE FOR CHILD ENDANGERMENT!!! WHAT IS NEXT???? ENFORCING PUBLIC SAFETY AND ENCOURAGING IDEAS OF RESPONSIBLE GUN OWNERSHIP!?!?!!??? WE LIVE IN A POLICE STATE!!!!!! WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!
Get a fucking grip dude
You can whine and weasel all you like, my Second Amendment rights aren't up for debate and there is nothing you can do about it.
There should unironically be a test for gun ownership that involves essay writing, critical thinking, and general knowledge. An even harder test should be required to vote.
Over half of the general public is too stupid to have a say in the affairs of the nation and how things are run. Universal suffrage was a mistake and the concept of universal rights is wrong.
>Babby's first philosopher
>Hurr Durr the government should get to issue tests to decide who has Natural Rights
No way fag. As I said, not up for debate.
Our problem is not universal rights, it’s people whose sole aim is to rob the general public if their rights by keeping them ignorant through indoctrination systems and institutions.
No our problem is those who abuse our rights like gun nuts. Nobody needs more than a single action revolver like the founding persons of penile identity used to defeat british conservatives.
Don't get me wrong, that's really fucking stupid, but is it really illegal?
https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-35-criminal-law-and-procedure/in-code-sect-35-46-1-4/
Alright, that's fair.
Leaving an unattended 3 year old with a loaded firearm would 100% fall under "places the dependent in a situation that endangers the dependent's life or health".
2ND AMENDMENT
THE ATF IS A BIGGER THREAT TO THAT CHILD’S LIFE THAN HIS OWN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
Given the ATF has flashbanged a younger child than that and burned all of those kids at Waco...yes. Unironically yes.
wisconsin is really strict, it has its own wording in every gun manual
land of the cucks
That's why we have functioning, gun free based societies in Europe, where the constitutional right to life outweighs the wish of tards to play with guns.
You also have to beg us for gibs every time Putin farts in your general direction. People who don't own guns are basically subhuman.
>Gets machete'd by a 60 IQ Somalian.
you gays keep importing morons and your functioning society will turn into a hell scape with lack of guns being a serious concern when you stick you lilly white asshole out for some turk or moron to rape.
Western Europeans live in a little artificial bubble granted to them by the United States of America. It is because of them that you could larp as some type of evolved human living in a progressive utopia.
You are like children on their breasts, they protect you from that big scary world full of big scary guns and people wishing to do you harm. Watch your tone when you speak to your father.
Gubbermint has no right to disarm a young firearms enthusiast. Looks like a reasonable EDC for kindergarten. More guns = more safety, they are putting that kid at risk.
School shooters would absolutely stop being a problem if Chad brought his .45 to school every day.
That's one badass toddler. Bedtimes are for the unarmed.
>They told me it was bed-time.
>I told them it was dead-time.
Felons dont deserve gun rights. Get yeeted gay
My state allows children to carry both openly and concealed if they are with an adult who can also legally carry.
>lmao dumb fucking moron got wh-
>oh wait he was white, SHALL