>see new sp101 match champion at gun store. >$999. >ask them to price match to online for $839

>see new sp101 match champion at gun store
>$999
>ask them to price match to online for $839
>they agree to $850
>take a look at it, ask again if it's brand new
>they say yes
>burnt powder in the cylinders, lead/powder in the barrel
>tell them it's been fired
>they say it's been test fired by the factory, and they don't clean it
>the lube on the gun is gunked, cylinder is basically black around edges
>tell them there's no way it's brand new
>they tell me it's brand new in box
>leave
They said it's not cost effective to clean the gun from the factory, but damn this gun was filthy! No way it's brand new, right?

Sorry I don't have pics of it, but are factory guns usually filthy? I've purchased 7 and never had the issue before, including new from Ruger.

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Black person you successfully heckled got $150 off and you STILL walked away because of 10 minutes of relaxing gun cleaning in front of the computer screen? You are fricking stupid

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      A used one can be found for <$700 if you look, he made the right call.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      no it’s probably because the dumb Black person fudds were charging $150 over everyone else for a USED gun and then lied about it

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    No ruger is worth 850

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      well that's just incorrect. most Rugers are pieces of shit but the redhawk and super blackhawk are A-tier for magnum enthusiasts

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    FFLs lie about that stuff all the time. No 4473 and it's still new. They'll shoot the guns in their inventory and guns that come in as transfers and are happy to lie about it.
    Gunmagwarehouse sold me a used barrel and accused me of fraud when I asked what was up

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I get shooting it, but clean it up before putting it on display. This gun has sat, by their own admission, for a year on display. A year of sitting and you couldn't wipe it down and run a bore snake through? Just gonna let lead and powder sit there?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This stuff always annoyed me. What's nice is that some of the bigger shops here will have a stock of things and get you one out of the back instead of the display piece.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Have you ever worked at a gun store?
      Most of them dont even have a place to shoot the guns. And even if they have a trap to shoot into, its usually reserved for test firing during repairs and stuff.
      Also, you cant even really take them to the range, because if the guns leave the store for non business related reasons without being logged out of the stores boundbook / record keeping system, its illegal. I doubt most gun store owners wanna risk their license for a fricking Ruger.
      Also, most gun store employees get bored of guns after like a month of working around them.
      I went from “wooowweiieee a Colt 1911, so cool!!” to “Eh, these Nighthawks are kinda mid id rather have a Wilson” in about a month.

      I can guarantee you they did not give a shit about that revolver. They took it out of the box, made sure the serials matched whats on the box, and threw it in the case. You lost out on a good deal. Especially considering even if they did shoot it, its a fricking Ruger so its not like they couldve damaged it if they tried

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >They said it's not cost effective to clean the gun from the factory
    That sounds like bullshit to me. I've bought multiple brand new revolvers--two rugers and a S&W--that were certainly test fired at the factory because they included a fired casing with the gun, and they were spotlessly clean.
    I fingerfricked a Match Champion at my LGS and it was spotlessly clean.

    I think they're full of shit.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >buying from brick&mortar gun stores
    >ever

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I agree it's moronic to overpay, but sometimes brick and mortar gun stores can compete with online prices, it all depends on the store. And if your store has good service there's reasons to support them. Mine calls me every couple of months whenever some boomer kicks the can and they sell the guns from their estate. They know what kind of guns I like so I get first crack before anything goes out for general sale on the counter. I've gotten several remarkably good deals that way.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Some stores are worth doing it through if you're cool with the owners, and they provide good service. Not for every gun, but for difficult to obtain ones or cheap ones sure. I bought my maverick 88 from a brick and mortar despite paying another $30 over online. That said, it was clean as a whistle, OP was diligent enough to see it was fired so he made the right choice. If it's a shitty mom and pop shop, someone probably took it out and fired a few boxes and didn't bother to clean it for months. Would that hurt a ruger? Absolutely not. Is it gross to lie about selling a used gun new though? Yeah.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I got mine from a brick and mortar for $600 something, you just have to keep your eyes open. Have fun when ISPs decide to block all gun sites and cloudflare stops offering DDOS protection to them.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >I got mine from a brick and mortar for $600 something, you just have to keep your eyes open.
        id rather not have to stop in to a gun store every week to look for deals on guns i may not even be interested in. dropshipper sites consistently sell their guys for like 50% less than most local stores.
        >Have fun when ISPs decide to block all gun sites and cloudflare stops offering DDOS protection to them.
        ok keep on dreaming up scenarios where you get oppressed

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >id rather not have to stop in to a gun store every week to look for deals on guns i may not even be interested in
          I find it fun and like supporting local gun stores, but you need to know what you want, have a good sense of what things should be priced at, and have non-shit local gun stores.
          >ok keep on dreaming up scenarios where you get oppressed
          I've watched the internet go from the wild west to a bunch of sanitized social media sites and closed off incestuous circlejerks. It's just the general trend.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Have fun when ISPs decide to block all gun sites and cloudflare stops offering DDOS protection to them.
        >just overpay now for something that hasn’t happened yet
        How about no?

    • 1 month ago
      MilSurpDude

      It's surprisingly easy to find solid deals if you know what to look for, especially with pawn shops nowadays. Picrel is a like-new Miroku Winchester 1873 in .357 with an action I can only describe as "liquid" that I got for $900 from a local pawn shop.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I'd feel bad shooting that it looks more like a piece of art

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Anon… any advice for what to do when my erection lasts longer than 4 hours?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why the frick you got such veiny arms

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's called not being fat

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        mirin

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That's got to be the most gorgeous gun I've ever seen, holy frick

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Idk, I don’t find great deals on guns online anymore. After you factor in shipping, credit card fees, and transfer fees, it’s usually less than a $50 difference than a brick and mortar store. And I’d rather give business to my local shop. Plus you know what you’re getting when you buy it in person. You can hold it and function check before cash ever changes hands.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Idk, I don’t find great deals on guns online anymore.

        that's probably because you don't use price aggregators.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          why are you vagueposting about using the reddit gun deals subreddit

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >redditor can't into aggregators
            ngmi

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Online is what I use to find niche shit I’m not going to find wandering around. Pawn stores will randomly get shit and not know what they have. LGS will always at least know what to do with what they get. I’ve brought mine some real relics for gun smithing and cleanup.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It was definitely used, and they were such dumbfricks that they didn't even bother to clean the gun to hide it.
    What a bunch of lazy fricks.
    I hate gun stores so much it's unreal

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    People ITT are moronic. No, Ruger will not clean any of their firearms after the factory test fire. It will typically be cleaned by the dealer if put on display though, or otherwise cleaned by some vendors before shipping as part of their quality control. Go order a new Zastava and it'll be coated in so much powder and cosmoline you could run a tractor with it. If it bugs you, check out the Ruger forums, many others have b***hed about Ruger not cleaning their guns from the factory.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    i bought this taurus 66 new from a pawn shop for $400. came with its box and keys and everything. not even a nice pawn shop. one of the sketchy ones that overprices everything. the cheapest one on gunbroker is $450 plus $30 shipping and $25 transfer fee.

    maybe ten years ago that was the case but now i think there's more boomers scouring online retailers than there are people going to physical storefronts now, ironically enough

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Any drop shipper is going to be substantially cheaper than any lgs.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        but you just responded to a guy that said his local gun store is substantially cheaper than a drop shipper

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          He's wrong and unaware.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            NTA; it's rare but I could believe it depending on what he's selling. I have a semi local gun store that's a Leupold dealer who sells 2-3 models Leupold VX Freedom scopes cheaper than any site on gun.deals and an anon claims his LGS (at least at one point) sold even cheaper.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why does the sp101 even exist in current year? I can't think of anything it does "best". Any use case for a revolver I can think of there's something better then and SP101 for that use case. You can say aesthetics if you want but that's wholly subjective.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's more robust than anything else in its size class.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        fairy fricking farts and dreams.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          NTA but all revolver gays I know say ruger make the toughest revolvers especially for the money

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >NTA but all revolver gays I know say the marketing slogan

            I'm sure they do.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              yeah, I'm sure the noguns with a chip on his shoulder knows best

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              People who own and shoot resolvers. Why do you hate ruger? Do you prefer $1500 colts or what?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Why do you hate ruger?
                I don't hate Ruger I own several they are good. They're not magic though.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              There are literally Ruger only loads published in reloading manuals. You are factually wrong and anyone who really knows guns knows this. You can argue that it’s meaningless, but they are stronger.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You'll only find that for 45 Colt, so called because the Blackhawk exists.
                There are loads out there for Redhawks in particular, but most of them you get to make yourself.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Ruger guy reporting. My SP101 came basically spotless so they were either being morons and shooting merchandise at the store range or it was used.

                Those loads are Ruger-only because Rugers have traditionally had longer cylinders. Smiths won't be able to turn with them. Not a strength issue on S&W's part.

                every ruger revolver shill on this site cant explain why they like it over than "its built like a brick" as if every fricking revolver isn't.

                I like the stock grips, rubber with no finger grooves and nice little inserts. I also prefer the takedown on the Rugers over sideplate designs. Both highly subjective reasons but they're why Rugers fit the bill for me. They have nice distributor exclusive models as well, the Wiley Clapp editions in particular are great carry guns. I know that their double-actions (excluding LCR) have grittier triggers than Smiths or Colts but I still find their triggers totally serviceable. I don't think that S&Ws are less sturdy, but the Rugers are still very sturdy. The fit and finish on the Rugers do leave something to be desired especially for the current price point, Smith and Colt do a much better job there, but I still go for the Rugers for the other reasons.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If we're talking about a Redhawk compared to a Model 29 or 629, yes it's literally the strength of the gun. Generally you want a margin of safety, not marginal safety. Cylinders are only as strong as the stop notches and those N frame cylinders are mighty thin.
                A model 29 has roughly the same cylinder length as a super blackhawk.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Those loads are Ruger-only because Rugers have traditionally had longer cylinders. Smiths won't be able to turn with them. Not a strength issue on S&W's part.
                Changing caliber but in .45 Colt there are absolutely loads that only a Blackhawk can handle and a S&W can’t. Go to Hodgdon’s website and look at data if you don’t believe me. They list .45 Colt (mostly at old blackpowder pressures) and then .45 Colt for Ruger, Freedom Arm (who first built their revolvers on Ruger frames), and for TC contenders.

                They don’t split old SAA power loads from modern guns like with .45-70. S&Ws aren’t as strong. You can argue it doesn’t matter, and I’ll even say that no one is shooting enough .357 mag to wear out either brand in a lifetime, but you can’t say Rugers aren’t stronger.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not saying Ruger's aren't "tough" or durable or whatever the frick you want to say. What I'm saying is it's ridiculous for 90% of anyone to say they bought some gun because of its' "durability" when they are never going to get in the fricking ballpark of testing that durability. If you're the kind of guy that's pushing limits you're gonna find the edge without anyone's advice on the subject because that's just what you do. Some internet gay whose hobby is shopping and not shooting talking about robustness or durability is cringe as frick. You see the same shit in knife threads where gays who never cut anything want to argue about steel.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              it only takes one bad round or unnoticed squib to explode a gun. every gun owner is interested in durability by default

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >it only takes one bad round or unnoticed squib to explode a gun.

                Yeah and that's any gun made by anyone. No gun is immune to this. When you're talking durability you're talking useful service life based on expected use not "catastrophic use case". SO we're right back to where a 90% gay talking about durability is a larping homosexual. If you're really the guy who shoots the frick out of shit the only conversations you have about durability are about all the shit you broke from shooting the frick out of it or maybe something that exceeded your expectations(because it was an outlier experience).

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >When you're talking durability you're talking useful service life based on expected use not "catastrophic use case".
                no, we're talking about both. the range of tolerable pressure is considerably different between Ruger and most other brands. you're just trying to cook up some hot take like every other homosexual on the internet.

                >actually durability DOESN'T matter because blah blah blah
                just shush

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I wouldn't make the pressure argument about any of Ruger's guns excepting the Redhawk. The GP100 cylinder's thickness at the stop notches are very similar to the 686s for example: I wouldn't push more pressure than what old-spec 357 offers.
                I would make the durability argument though, because of the greater bearing surface at the end of the yoke tube, thicker forcing cone, looser functional tolerances, and stronger lockup design, a Ruger DA should outlast its closest size competitor about 2:1 or better.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                THATS WHY I ONLY SHOOT $2.50 A ROUND HORNADY CRITICAL DEFENSE OUTTA MY GUNS. ONLY THE BEST

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >THATS WHY I ONLY SHOOT MY OWN HANDLOADS OUTTA MY GUNS. ONLY THE BEST

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              You said the SP101 doesn't do anything better than other revolvers in its class.
              That's fricking wrong and you can find out real quick with a 2000 round 357 magnum torture test betwen it and its competition.
              Especially if you start using old load data.
              The SP101 is also about the smallest gun 357 Magnum is comfortable out of.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >2000 round 357 magnum torture test
                lol are you a gun magazine that has attained consciousness? Who the frick gives a frick about that shit? Does anyone actually shoot anymore or is the entire culture based on what some e-celeb/industry shill/lifestyle brand posted on the internet?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                2000 rounds is not super hard to do if you shoot regularly.. if you reload it’s not even all that expensive…

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Steel makes a big difference with knives and people who buy guns want them to last forever and work well.

              >Why do you hate ruger?
              I don't hate Ruger I own several they are good. They're not magic though.

              Well made guns are just that. No magic to it.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >people who buy guns that don't actually shoot want them to last forever and work well.
                Those people are idiots because something you never use lasts forever. People who shoot know used things get used. If you'd ever burned up a gun like other people burn up ammo you'd grok.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Who pissed in your breakfast bro? You're angry online for no reason right now. People shoot guns go to the range and you will see other people there shooting as well. Might be less now because of the economy and ammo price but it is what it is.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Those people are idiots because something you never use lasts forever. People who shoot know used things get used
                Well made things last a lifetime. I have a bolt action .22 my grandpa shot the shit out of, my dad shot the shit out of, and I shoot now. My dad refinished the stock but otherwise it’s fine. I have a Model 8 from the 20s that is perfectly fine. I have a Garand from the 50s, a Mosin from the 40s, a CZ52, a Mak from the 50s. All of them are in perfectly fine mechanical condition and will last another couple decades. How many shotguns are decades old and have thousands and thousands of rounds through them and are fine?

                Eventually rifling wears. Springs wear. But with cheap replacements and some care there is no reason a well made gun doesn’t late generations.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        What a meaningless statement. Robust for what? You a 1% Black person that's putting 200k rds a year downrange? No you're probably a 90% Black person that will put MAYBE 100rds out of it a year for a year or two and then sell it or otherwise forget about it in the back of the safe.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          fairy fricking farts and dreams.

          Says the Black person shilling j frames and fricking taurus lmao

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            every ruger revolver shill on this site cant explain why they like it over than "its built like a brick" as if every fricking revolver isn't.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              My LCRs have a better trigger than every j frame or taurus shit out of their respective factories since the dawn of time.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                my experience has been different; I finger-fricked two LCRs intending to buy one and instantly had all my enthusiasm torpedoed. The LCR's trigger felt like rubber.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >every ruger revolver shill on this site cant explain why they like it over than "its built like a brick" as if every fricking revolver isn't.
              Tbf my family has broken two different S&W 686 revolvers beyond repair by accidentally dropping them from desk height. My only Ruger is an LCP so I dont have a dog in the fight but Id be immediately tempted to believe theyre more solid than SW just because the SW durability is kind of ridiculous from my sample size of 2.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                S&W are legacy designs over 100 years old. Metallurgy and manufacturing advances, but the designs themselves aren't substantially different and that comes with its own problems.
                Weird as it sounds, until Ruger introduced the Blackhawk in 1955, there was little real innovation in revolvers going back to the turn of the century.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >broken two different S&W 686 revolvers beyond repair by accidentally dropping them from desk height.

                ITP: Lies

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Beyond repair is probably the correct word if the yoke tube is bent or damaged in any way. It only takes a couple degrees for it to not lock up any longer.
                That requires the replacement of the crane/yoke which in turn means refitting the cylinder. I wonder if S&W even honors a warranty for dropping them, because that repair would be half the cost of the revolver.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                doubt.jpg

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It also carries 1 round less than everything else in its size class (a steel k frame snub is the same size and weight, the airweights are even lighter lmao)

        There are literally Ruger only loads published in reloading manuals. You are factually wrong and anyone who really knows guns knows this. You can argue that it’s meaningless, but they are stronger.

        S&W only loads have been more powerful for over 20 years

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          454 is a higher pressure cartridge than 460 and 500.
          The X frames are also just pieces of shit.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            454 casull and 460 S&W are both rated for 65ksi
            There's really not a good reason to buy any Ruger product tbqh

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Smith and Wesson don’t make an xframe in 454.. you’d have to get the longer cylinder 460.. colt is afraid of anything hotter than 44 magnum. And Taurus need not be in the conversation. If you want a double action 454 that’s not got an Xbox huge cylinder then Ruger is the way to go.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Ruger makes comically large/heavy revolver in a high power cartridge
                >whoa that's heckin basederino
                >S&W makes comically large/heavy revolver that's even more powerful and closer in size/weight to the Redhawk than the Redhawk is to the N frames
                >NOOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T DO THAT MUH RUGER IS THE STRONGEST NOOOOOOOOOOOO

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Redhawks aren't comically large, about the size of an N frame.
                Xframes have no equivalent on the market.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                There’s an argument to be made that the super redhawk and redhawk were designed more for handgun hunting…. And the xframe was designed to shoot the biggest, and then the fastest round..

                They’re all fun though

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            They actually handle the same pressure(65,000psi), but the Redhawk is a 6 shot in 454 while the X frame is just 5. The X frames are hust significantly longer/bigger.
            Ruger also uses a better steel for their 454 Cylinders which allowed for a 6 shot gun.(465 Carpenter stainless)

            There’s a reason Dick Casull was using Ruger frames when he started making .454 revolvers. They are very strong

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              literally no one cares about revolver cartridges bigger than .44. i dont care if a ruger revolver lasts 500k rounds as opposed to an S&W lasting 400k. the biggest thing i care about in revolvers is trigger pull because thats where 99% of your effectiveness is coming from.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                A more reasonable argument. Are we jumping on the Colt train, bros?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Vanilla Korth since we're talking about trains. Sorry for those who missed it.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I want to pick up a 44 mag revolver and the Kodiak looks like sex.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I predict that it will be great. Bring it to an indoor range to haze the 9mm bros

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Now we only care about the trigger.
                All revolver triggers can be cleaned up to be smooth, light, and reliable with any primer(around 8 to 8.5lbs da)
                The things you can change are how long the trigger pull is. Colt has the shortest pull, Smiths in the middle, and Rugers are long. Decide what you like.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                *the things you CAN'T change

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Tell that to the guy who started using x-frames and .460 and .500 as arguments

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >S&W only loads have been more powerful for over 20 years
          Post reloading manual

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous
            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              A s&w 500 (x frame) weighs 71oz, the heaviest super redhawk in .454 weighs 52oz. Are you telling me a bigger hunk of steel handles more pressure? No way. I guess having a heavy ruger makes sense in other calibers idk. This is bizarre dude.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They actually handle the same pressure(65,000psi), but the Redhawk is a 6 shot in 454 while the X frame is just 5. The X frames are hust significantly longer/bigger.
                Ruger also uses a better steel for their 454 Cylinders which allowed for a 6 shot gun.(465 Carpenter stainless)

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                500 s&w is also thicker, even if ruger made it, the same size gun would still be a 5 shot. By the time you upscale a 500s&w revolver to 6rds you'd be at damn near shotgun/rifle weights.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The 500S&W I can see being a 5 shot, but an extended frame Redhawk using 465 Carpenter cylinder at 1.78" diameter would contain a 6 shot 460 S&W with no problem. Pressure is pressure and it contains 454.
                Ruger just doesn't make a frame long enough.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >A bigger, heavier frame is ok when it's a Ruger but not when it's a S&W
                The fact is X frames are closer to Redhawks than Redhawks are to N frames. Ruger's closest competitor to the N frame is the GP100 which gets mogged brutally. The L frame, despite being lighter and slimmer than the GP100, is more robust than it.
                Ruger never grew out of the malaise era

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That's fricking wrong.
                So there's a barrel length disparity here by 0.5".
                The SRH weighs 44oz, the 629 3" is 39oz.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Here are the other dimensions, Redhawks are N frame sized.

                GP100s are also L frame sized. It's fricking weird that people lie on the internet about shit that's easily found.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/Zi7ExCX.jpeg

                GP100 here weighs 36oz, the 686+ weighs 37.4oz.

                >686+ is smaller and holds an extra round
                >69 is smaller and can handle 44 mag instead of just 44 spl
                >629 is closer in weight to a gp100 than srh even with a longer barrel than either
                I accept your concession

                GP100 is a medium frame. An L-Frame equivalent.

                >It's a medium frame that's not as big as an N frame because.. it just is OK?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're dimensionally challenged.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, that's a smaller frame. Here's a Super Redhawk with an N-Frame. See that they're closer in size? SRH is actually still a little smaller.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >not using the 454 casull version..
                Lame

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                GP100 is a medium frame. An L-Frame equivalent.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >moving the goalposts to compare completely different things
              I accept your concession

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's a misunderstood gun. It's not a bigger pocket gun - it's a smaller belt gun. What a Glock 43X is to a Glock 19, an SP101 is to a medium-frame revolver. It's for people who want a heavy shootable revolver but need something smaller to conceal.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >a heavy shootable revolver but need something smaller to conceal.
        Yeah but it's not heavy or shootable in .357. It sucks balls to shoot hot magnums out of. It is too heavy for innapocket though and I can conceal a 6 shot K-frameor 6 shot 856) no problem so why gimp myself with 1 less round. The sp101 is for someone who has never really thought about revolvers seriously. The one op bought is for double morons. Call it a "match" gun when it's 100% not suitable for being a match gun and all they shit they did to it made it less suitable as a defensive gun and they charged you a premium to deliver this useless product.

        2000 rounds is not super hard to do if you shoot regularly.. if you reload it’s not even all that expensive…

        Yeah but you're cleaning and maintaining it during those 2K rounds. You're not just abusing your gun for social media engagement numbers.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You can carry a K-Frame but some people just want a smaller gun that isn’t an airweight. It’s not that hard to comprehend. They’ve been on the market for 30 years. There are competitive divisions for small frame 5-shot revolvers which is why Ruger makes a Match Champion for the SP101 line.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >some people just want a smaller gun that isn’t an airweight.

            Taurus and Kimber both make smallish 6 shots though. Maybe 30 years ago there weren't so many options but today there are better options. The sp101 has no reason to exist in current year. It's not tops at anything.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              They’re always going to be bigger. You need a taller frame and the cylinder must be wider for six-shots. It doesn’t have to be “the best” at everything or any particular thing, it just has to fit your needs.

              >There are competitive divisions for small frame 5-shot revolvers
              What guns do the top competitors use? How many people nationwide participate? Is OP one of them? Keep grasping at those straws though lol. "match champion" is a marketing gimmick. It's targeted squarely at the "doesn't know shit but wants to feel they are buying premium" market. I would put serious money down that no one at the top of any leaderboard anywhere is using a "match champion."

              Ruger makes competition guns and people do compete with them. What makes the SP or GP MC unsuitable for competition?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >it just has to fit your needs.
                Post needs and I'll detail you how sp101 is not the best answer to any of them.

                >What makes the SP or GP MC unsuitable for competition?
                I never said the guns weren't suitable. You can compete with anything. I did say OP is probably not a competitor and I'd wager 99.9% of all the morons who ever bought a "match champion" are not competitors either. I'd also wager that no one routinely topping leaderboards at whatever this mystical 5-shot revolver competition is is using a "match champion."

                It's a gun. You are free to like it. I am free to think it's essentially worthless in current year. Simple as.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >There are competitive divisions for small frame 5-shot revolvers
            What guns do the top competitors use? How many people nationwide participate? Is OP one of them? Keep grasping at those straws though lol. "match champion" is a marketing gimmick. It's targeted squarely at the "doesn't know shit but wants to feel they are buying premium" market. I would put serious money down that no one at the top of any leaderboard anywhere is using a "match champion."

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Yeah but it's not heavy or shootable in .357. It sucks balls to shoot hot magnums out of
          It’s 27oz. That’s not light. A G20 is 27oz empty and shooting 10mm isn’t bad. You do have recoil benefits with the G20 but come on, it’s not a .357 in a scandium j frame.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >It sucks balls to shoot hot magnums out of
          It's actually quite pleasant, I shoot hot magnums out of my lcr too and while it's snappy, it doesn't hurt.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I can't think of anything it does "best"
      .327 Magnum host.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Also it's the best small frame 357 magnum carry gun. SP101 is the smallest 357 that I would ever want to shoot and I don't carry guns that I don't practice with.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          .357 still doesn't hit decent levels until a 4" barrel.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            If you don't want to go with .357 it is insanely controllable with .38 +P. Deletes recoil

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          small 357s are dumb.

          >I can't think of anything it does "best"
          .327 Magnum host.

          meme cartridge. 38s won. deal with it.

          his revolver shooting videos definitely gave revolver CCers a lot of cope arguments to use to defend their choice, such as the infamous 'shoot through your coat pocket' maneuver.

          personally, the only reason to choose a revolver for CC (other than 'because they're cool') is them not jamming if you are knocked over. that is the ONE real common problem you see with automatics in bodycam vids. the rationale for carrying revolvers is simply trading effectiveness for nigh guaranteed reliability. I know if someone made a real AIWB holster for my R8 i definitely would carry it.

          >the only reason to choose a revolver for CC
          is because you shoot/practice enough to be competent with it and you carry it every day. Everything else is bullshit.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >850 for a 5 shot…
    I always buy used revolvers cause it’s easy to find the deficiencies on a revolver. They’re hard to cover up.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >it's a 5-shot
      I completely forgot the sp101 is a 5-shot, that's how little I pay attention to Ruger.

      I still don't know how the frick rugergays still claim Ruger's casting is "just as strong" as forgings, when their castings have like 1.5x the metal of equivalent forgings. I like everything about the M77 except the fact that if you put it next to a forged mauser it looks like playdough.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Designs matter a lot more than whether metal is forged or cast.
        Both methods are heat treated and results are difficult to argue with.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          No, forged steel is stronger than cast steel. It doesn't matter how you treat a steel which by the very method of it's forming has a compromised grain structure.
          Why do you think they bother forging things to begin with? The first step of forging IS CASTING. Why do you think foundries don't just stop there?

          >results are difficult to argue with
          You're right, they are: steel castings are always heavier, because there is more steel, because the steel is weaker. If it was cast and machined down to the same weight as a forging it would break sooner than the forging. And that's taking into account the superior geometries achievable with castings.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Have you ever compared the top strap of a service six to a K frame?
            They're virtually identical in thickness. Surely if the casting is so much weaker than the forged steel we can expect blasting 357 Magnum to cause failure quickly right?
            For reference, revolver frames are not particularly stressed. Ruger's frames are that size just because they are, not out of necessity. So if cast and forged doesn't really make a difference in this application, why are you talking about it?

            As for weight differences, the GP100 and L frames are similar weight, the K frames and Six series guns are similar too.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              NTA but he’s right, cast guns have to be thicker to achieve the same strength because the steel isn’t as strong. Forging is a strengthening process. Remember that the service six line was ditched over 30 years ago for the upgraded GP100 which is stronger. Revolver frames are absolutely stressed under fire. Rugers and Smiths are definitely more than strong enough so the “muh revolver is stronger” is a stupid debate.

              Holy shit are revolver users carrying this much of a persecution complex in general or is it just this guy

              I don’t really get it either, I just like revolvers but there are so many people crying about long-debunked fuddlore and terrible takes like Tauruses and mexican carry. It must just be a very high rate of autism.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >the Rugers MUST be thicker or else
                This is very false and you don't even know enough to understand why that's wrong.
                In this particular application, a revolver frame, which is not particularly stressed, Rugers are substantially overbuilt for the purpose.
                Guys have been milling material out of frame windows of blackhawks to fit oversized cylinders forever. Any fixed sight Ruger DA's topstrap is about the same thickness as the equivalent S&W frame size.

                It's not a matter of "is forged stronger?", relative to its application here it literally doesn't matter. Anecdotally, The forged frames being harder means they're also more brittle, so if the frame is for some reason a failure point it will manifest by throwing the barrel and breaking the shank. This is caused by stress cycles, perhaps incorrect heat treat, or out of spec endshake that causes greater stress.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If the frame of a revolver isn't "particularly stressed" how did that frame fail?
                >Rugers are substantially overbuilt for the purpose.
                "overbuilt" for what? The frame isn't "particularly stressed" so what is it overbuilt for? Non-particular stresses? Ambiguous stresses? Molecular stresses?

                Have you ever compared the top strap of a service six to a K frame?
                They're virtually identical in thickness. Surely if the casting is so much weaker than the forged steel we can expect blasting 357 Magnum to cause failure quickly right?
                For reference, revolver frames are not particularly stressed. Ruger's frames are that size just because they are, not out of necessity. So if cast and forged doesn't really make a difference in this application, why are you talking about it?

                As for weight differences, the GP100 and L frames are similar weight, the K frames and Six series guns are similar too.

                >So if cast and forged doesn't really make a difference in this application, why are you talking about it?
                As I previously said, I like everything about the M77 except it's moronic receiver. Though I'm sure you're about to tell me that's also "overbuilt" or "not serendipitously stressed" or whatever other fuddlore to avoid accepting what everyone in every single engineering field knows with absolute certainty to be true.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Frames, under normal circumstances, never fail, they don't change dimensions, they don't bend. The cylinders contain the pressure and the forcing cone takes the bullet's ass beating.
                I have seen a lot of S&W frames fail, but there's always some weird situation involved that should have been noticed and addressed, unless it was heat treat, no one is preemptively xraying guns.
                You're trying to argue against conventional wisdom of guys like Casull and Linebaugh when it comes to how much a cast frame's thickness matters. Ruger's are nowhere near on the edge of safety concern even in their thinnest configuration.

                M77: Recievers are stressed, they contain the pressure the cartridge generates. Frames do not. Ruger didn't make those guns to be on the edge of safe, if you don't like how it looks that's fine.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What's incredible about rhe X frames is that they are so unnecessarily large.
    BFR cylinders are a full 0.17" smaller in diameter and house the same cartridges.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Every single revolver thread seems to devolve into Ruger vs Smith & Wesson, or how X Revolver is crap and Y load will break x gun. I would like to inform all revolvergays that all the autoloading gays are laughing at you. Except for the guys who carry 30+ year old snubnose .38s with wadcutters. You guys are cool. The rest of you, not so much. Pic not related.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It’s the revolver version of arguing if a 17 rd mag in generic 9mm pistol a is better than a 19 rd mag in generic 9mm pistol b.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      someone pointed out that the subset of revolveranons that base their entire identity around their modern CC revolvers are invariably insufferable buttholes and this past month has made me start to believe that

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        they remind me of the glockgays from 10 years ago, or the 7+ year shilling campaign in a general on this board that will go unnamed. On the topic of shills, I don't think they're even paid. I just think they come here to try to justify a hasty purchase decision and stave off buyer's remorse.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >are invariably insufferable buttholes

        It's hard to be at the end of a decades long research project and then some gay wants to argue about shit using bullshit fuddlore you personally deboonked 30 years ago with practical experience. Also gun marketing has done incredible mental damage to the average gun consumer. Most people are too moronic to ever get to true proficiency with firearms. Some can go all the way. I'm only concerned with the "all the way" guys. They don't get butthurt because they have confidence based on practical experience and they don't care if you don't like their methods or equipment because they know it works and don't require the validation of randoms on the internet.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        > that base their entire identity around their modern CC revolvers
        really, thats very interesting, especially since you're replying to a guy pretending to be a neutral 3rd party saying "uhhh actually whats really cool are those guys who carry a detective special wit da flat boolits"

        this is such insane projection considering the beat-up old revolver user crowd makes up the majority of revolver users on /k/

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >beat-up old revolver user crowd
          >has the nicest stuff
          >much butthurt ensues

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          revolvers are for women who can't work a slide
          >t. gf carries revolver

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >not enough hand strength to work a slide but a 15 pound trigger is no problem
            Post her groups, kek

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              she ain't winning any matches with it, but she's adequate for hitting minute of rapist

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Holy shit are revolver users carrying this much of a persecution complex in general or is it just this guy

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You weren't supposed to prove them right that every part of the revolver community aside from the ones that like old school stuff is fricking cancer

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            i have not once EVER on this site heard anyone touting how cool their "modern CC revolver" is. Is this someone whos still upset about the acrylic cyberpunk grips that guy was selling?

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >touting how cool their "modern CC revolver" is.
              Not what us being discussed.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        unironically I think Paul H. unintentionally caused that

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          his revolver shooting videos definitely gave revolver CCers a lot of cope arguments to use to defend their choice, such as the infamous 'shoot through your coat pocket' maneuver.

          personally, the only reason to choose a revolver for CC (other than 'because they're cool') is them not jamming if you are knocked over. that is the ONE real common problem you see with automatics in bodycam vids. the rationale for carrying revolvers is simply trading effectiveness for nigh guaranteed reliability. I know if someone made a real AIWB holster for my R8 i definitely would carry it.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            revolvers have great draw characteristics because their grips sit fully above the waistline, and they're nice for daily carry because you can load and unload them without causing seating issues. Not having a chamber state to worry about is also a small bonus for people with compulsive tendencies.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >revolvers have great draw characteristics because their grips sit fully above the waistline
              Meh. I think autos can do this a little better.
              >they're nice for daily carry because you can load and unload them without causing seating issues. Not having a chamber state to worry about is also a small bonus for people with compulsive tendencies.
              Yes absolutely. I feel way safer AIWBing a revolver and think they're just generally safer to handle daily and leave loaded. People do safely CC striker guns every day but my comfort level is a DA trigger with an exposed hammer.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous
              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Australian self-incriminating.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'm pretty sure Paul was responsible for this bizarre surge in lever-action proponents that happened one summer several years back, right around the time he made a vid about them being viable HD/survival weapons. Posters were insisting an AR was "overkill," that levers would "get you off easy with a jury," and other surreal takes. Paul's a good guy but I really think he caused a wave of neofuddery.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              It's not Paul Harrell, the gun market got insanely saturated with tactical guns and people just started to get bored or turned off by it. There's also people like me that just never felt fully comfortable with carrying a wienered gun pointed at their wiener. I'd consider a DA/SA but the good ones are all big and the small ones are all bad.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >the gun market got insanely saturated with tactical guns and people just started to get bored or turned off by it.

                really, "people" huh? more like contrarian PrepHoleners who are magnetically opposed to anything they consider 'popular'

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Well then there must be a lot of contrarian PrepHoleners because revolver and lever-gun sales are high and manufacturers are releasing new models left and right.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >because revolver and lever-gun sales are high
                baseless claim
                >and manufacturers are releasing new models left and right.
                you mean taking old models and putting mlok on them hoping to ride the tacticool wave?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                My dude, S&W is bringing out a fricking Marlin clone too. It's a weird market right now.
                https://www.gunsandammo.com/editorial/top-selling-guns-january-2024/487042

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                CZ group seems to have bought Colt just to churn out revolvers. 7 product lines and dozens of models re-introduced in the last 8 years. Kimber makes revolvers now. S&W released new carry models at shot show this year. Extrapolate from there. IDK man, you can call me out on not having industry data on hand, but you have absolutely nothing to prove that I'm wrong.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >CZ group seems to have bought Colt just to churn out revolvers.
                yeah because og pythons sell for like 3k despite being mid. Selling new production ones for 1k is a no brainer for a company trying to wring out as much profit as they can from the aging prostitute that is 'Colt'
                >Kimber makes revolvers now.
                yeah and who the frick wants them? they're ugly cudgels that cost as much or more than proven S&W or ruger models.
                >S&W released new carry models at shot show this year
                because S&W has consistently been making revolvers, same as ruger.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I mean the kimbers seemed decently popular for a revolver, IIRC their whole thing was being a bit skinnier and more streamlined than smith or ruger

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I think plenty of people want the Kimber revolver since they make a J frame sized revolver with 6 shots of .357

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Do you have any data to back that up? This feels like we've had this discussion before.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                of course i dont you moron, all of this is conjecture.

                My dude, S&W is bringing out a fricking Marlin clone too. It's a weird market right now.
                https://www.gunsandammo.com/editorial/top-selling-guns-january-2024/487042

                the article even says it, the popularity is most likely due to straight-wall hunting restrictions. also if you look at armslist all you fricking see are these new leverguns listed because people buy them on a whim, realize .357 and .44 cost as much as 5.56 then ditch them.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >all the leverguns on the market are used
                Baseless claim.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >putting words in my mouth + childish snark

                double down by laser focusing on the phrase "my mouth" and replying with a dick sucking joke

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Baseless claims need somthing to back them rather than conjecture. If you don't like my strawman then at least source what your claim actually was.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                He's a little homosexual and he highjacked my post for the lulz XD. This is my only response to you:

                CZ group seems to have bought Colt just to churn out revolvers. 7 product lines and dozens of models re-introduced in the last 8 years. Kimber makes revolvers now. S&W released new carry models at shot show this year. Extrapolate from there. IDK man, you can call me out on not having industry data on hand, but you have absolutely nothing to prove that I'm wrong.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                This feels like projection

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's a more plausible reason for a market trend than "youtoober with less than 1M followers posted some videos"

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Well then there must be a lot of contrarian PrepHoleners because revolver and lever-gun sales are high and manufacturers are releasing new models left and right.

                How did we get to equating PrepHole posting trends to the entire fricking gun buyerbase?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Because I don't think it's just PrepHole posters expressing interest, that's just a reflection of the whole market.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You think the whole market was thinking lever-actions were a superior alternative to ARs for self defense? Because that's what was being pointed out in the original post

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Not that I have a dog in this fight since I own and enjoy cowboy guns and tacticool larperator shit, but
                >These companies are offering new revolver products, so therefore the gun market is bored with ARs and the like and want to return to monke
                seems like a bit of a stretch in terms of conclusions

                Anon's just really really excited at the possibility that his preferred product could be the new hotness as silly as that sounds

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Sure, and I've already benefited from it. There are more models and more holsters available than just a few years ago.

                You think the whole market was thinking lever-actions were a superior alternative to ARs for self defense? Because that's what was being pointed out in the original post

                No I don't think that, but I think more people are buying lever-guns than a few years ago. From that point, people tend to start coping in weird ways about how their gun is "superior" because blah blah blah. You can see it in this thread with different revolver manufacturers or models.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >No I don't think that, but
                That's strange, because what was being discussed was this bizarre take and others like it, on PrepHole, and how Paul likely influenced that. So if you don't think that was incorrect and wasn't a reflection of the gun market, then there was no reason whatsoever to interject

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i know /k/ likes to act like paul harrel is their secret lil dude but he DOES have a million subs and was featured on garand thumb.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Ok. Yeah, again I don't think Paul Harrell had frick all to do with that.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You don't think a popular YouTuber on /k/ was responsible for a surge in weird takes, on /k/, that coincided with a video he posted shortly beforehand?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Interesting.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                dude's crippled by autism, give him a break

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's reddit brainrot.

            • 4 weeks ago
              MilSurpDude

              >this bizarre surge in lever-action proponents that happened one summer several years back,
              That was some of the gayest fricking shit I've seen on this board, and I could just tell a bunch of contrarian zoomers were doing it.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah. Well 1892s are better gg nore

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                yeah especially those dudes trying to hype up this piece of shit.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Meh, I like mine. Have you actually shot one?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                its a blowback PCC, anon, they all shoot the same.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It’s got a spring loaded weight in it like the old Ruger police carbines.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Is that a comp?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, they actually make one specifically for it and I figured why not. It’s purely for shits and giggles.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >s/n under 5k
                When did you get yours? Wonder how well they're selling to see a s/n like that. Only time I've seen a s/n lower is on an H&R lower from PSA.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I think like a month or two after they came out? I really liked the look of them and the range I go to got 2 of them in.. insight… which I think is part of a chain? So my guess is they got allotted 2 out of the original run? But for what it’s worth my serial isn’t below 5k, just the last 4 numbers.. unless Henry started production at 270,000,000.

                It’s a fun gun though, swapped the original ring sight for a skinner aperature sight.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Should add the range I bought it from still has the other one. I don’t know if they’re selling well, but if you do get one I would strongly advise getting the Glock mag adapter (or sig if you can find it) because I wouldn’t want to be hunting for Henry mags if it gets discontinued…

                If I ever get a 9mm suppressor though.. I’m gonna splurge and get one of the 100 round double drum mags just so I can post pictures of it suppressed with 100 rounds of capacity in the occasional PCC threads solely to make the mp5 crowd rage…

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Should add the range I bought it from still has the other one. I don’t know if they’re selling well, but if you do get one I would strongly advise getting the Glock mag adapter (or sig if you can find it) because I wouldn’t want to be hunting for Henry mags if it gets discontinued…
                Yep, going to get a handful of Henry mags if I pick one up. 5 should do. Adapter will be nice for range use though. Have the Henry mags been reliable?
                >If I ever get a 9mm suppressor though.. I’m gonna splurge and get one of the 100 round double drum mags just so I can post pictures of it suppressed with 100 rounds of capacity in the occasional PCC threads solely to make the mp5 crowd rage…
                Oh man, I dream of getting one of those to put a silencer on. I might want an MP5 clone to silence first but that seems like good fun. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3j2bL8CRbw

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Honestly I ran about 500 rounds through the Henry mags and haven’t used them since I put the Glock magwell in just because it’s nice using the 33 rd Glock mags…. My only gripe with the Henry’s was the 5 rd one sometimes stacked weird and didn’t wanna take the 5th round.. but they fed well. I did try one off brand Glock mag that wouldn’t properly feed for the life of it, but it was 16$ off of Amazon so I got what I paid for I guess. With the actual Glock mags I haven’t had an issue, I’m at around 2500-3000 rounds through it.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >a month or two after they came out
                That's a lot better than I thought then. I saw one at Cabelas and never even thought to jot down the s/n for ideas on production numbers.
                >But for what it’s worth my serial isn’t below 5k, just the last 4 numbers.. unless Henry started production at 270,000,000
                I'm going to assume they did. I've seen plenty of massive serial numbers on low production guns. Hell, the VL only has 19k or 23k made depending on which source you trust. Meanwhile I've seen multiple s/ns outside of BOTH of those ranges (oddly only slightly more than 10k over...). Daisy did the same with the 2201 and the 2213; I strongly suspect they started at 10,000, albeit with a small sample size for observation. My H&R lower has a 3,00x,xxx range s/n. They've only made a couple hundred at best; Mike pretty much tells AR15.com when there's a batch (or another user finds it the moment it's in stock) and a batch is usually anywhere from 70 on the low end to 100-150 on the high. I could go on and on about faux high serial numbers but I'd be here for ages lol. Several other companies do it. Even military production does it. Sometimes the first digits are incremented year by year such as (supposedly) Chinese SKS production or 10/22 production, etc.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >trading effectiveness
            Do I need to mag dump 11 rounds or something in any self defense scenario?

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Do I need to mag dump 11 rounds or something in any self defense scenario?

              yeah, you might. we have plenty of bodycam footage showing 17rd magdumps and no takedowns. inb4 you appeal to 'rationality' by saying you will never do anything other than shoot a crackhead at 3ft away.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >we have plenty of bodycam footage showing 17rd magdumps and no takedowns
                Post one

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                > you might. we have plenty of bodycam footage showing 17rd magdumps and no takedown
                Show me a single one with good hits and no stop

                you're adults. asking for evidence of things you can easily search yourself is stupid. this is an anonymous internet argument and i have no desire to put WORK into it.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >make outrageous claim
                >nooooo don’t expect me to back up my outrageous claim
                Your fake taking the high road is an obvious and very gay cop out. Just say you were exaggerating

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >cops cant hit shit
                >an outrageous claim

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >changes argument from 17rds of 9mm aren’t enough to
                >well you might miss 17 times
                Skill issue. Post body cams

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                lol so you can’t find one, thanks for admitting defeat.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Won’t happen with .357. Maybe your little baby 9mm won’t take someone down but two rounds of magnum will do the job 7/7 times.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                > you might. we have plenty of bodycam footage showing 17rd magdumps and no takedown
                Show me a single one with good hits and no stop

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >plenty of bodycam footage
                Irrelevant in this context. Police shootings and average Joe defensive shootings don't play out the same way because criminals behave like cornered animals when fighting with police.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >criminals behave like cornered animals when fighting with police.
                so will jamal when you decide to deny him an enrichment opportunity. you have to be a literal moron or a 70 year old man to believe a 5/6 shot gun is gonna be enough for a pack of feral Black folk

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Nope, I just have to be a person that lives in reality. Let me remind you that in 2020 we had instances of mob attacks just like in peoples' fantasies, and the greatest number of rounds fired in any single encounter was 5. Mobs disperse when shots are fired, they don't double down and abandon their will to live just to get you.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                don’t care. why even take the chance?

                > is gonna be enough for a pack of feral Black folk
                Ahem
                >https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1984_New_York_City_Subway_shooting
                5 shots for 4 Black folk and that’s still the record for the most documented attackers out in public. Rittenhouse was in the middle of a riot and still only fired what, 7 shots?

                subway car is extremely close quarters. they were also unarmed teenagers. push the Black person encounter out to 15-20 feet with 3-4 experienced Black folk i doubt the results would have been the same.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >just make a realistic scenario completely unrealistic and it’s different!

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                how is a group of 3-4 approaching you with violent intentions from 20 feet away unrealistic? go outside you dumb homosexual

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I carry a variety of guns between five to sixteen round capacity and the capacity never makes the difference of what gun I carry. It's not a matter of taking a chance because there is no chance. I will never be in a situation where I will be injured or killed because I ran out of ammo after five shots and neither will you.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I will be injured or killed because I didn't have a gun on me and neither will you
                Ftfy, why even carry?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Because there are tens of thousands of recorded cases of people needing a gun to defend themselves, but there are zero recorded cases of an average Joe being injured or dying because they ran out of ammo after firing 5 shots. There is a significant difference between preparing for a rare case and worrying about but what if scenarios as a subset of that rare case. I have been asking for anyone to present me a documented case of anyone failing to defend themselves with 5-6 rounds for at least five years, but I have yet to see a single one. The fact that not a single one has showed up in five years, let alone the history of self defense shootings, shows that it is not a scenario worth considering. Of course, you could prove me wrong with just one case, but we both know what your response will be, don't we?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Because there are tens of thousands of recorded cases of people needing a gun to defend themselves, but there are zero recorded cases of an average Joe being injured or dying because they ran out of ammo after firing 5 shots
                Serious question, but are you obtaining the round count figures for all of these instances from police or court documents? Just about all of the information I've seen on DGUs, mostly in the form of news stories, don't even get close to detailing things like round counts.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                There is no good data and there never will be because that data would go against many of the oligarchs agendas. The data we do have is mostly old but it does indicate that, for the most part, round counts are really low in DGUs. Just from watching a shitload of DGU vids and hearing the gunfire in my neighborhood I tend to agree. It's rare to see/hear a string of more than 6 or so rounds. I'd wager if we had data we'd see that round counts are higher now but that would be due to the prevalence of higher capacity guns and people shooting more then necessary.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                There is no good data and that’s purposely so. However, think logically about this. Let’s say someone who is carrying is attacked, fired all their rounds, then was still killed. Do you think no one would hear about it? The media will promote that as
                >see even if you’re armed it doesn’t help you, you don’t need guns
                >see someone who got a special license and was “trained” couldn’t even stop an attacker, what good is the average joe
                If they fired and missed all their shots its
                >see look how dangerous carriers are to the public they’re firing wildly

                Now from the gun industry side let’s take that same situation. If someone shot their attacker(s) but died because they didn’t have enough rounds, why wouldn’t manufacturers pimp that story everywhere? In the age of 1.5 stack micro 9s a story like that would take off. If you’re someone who has a gen 1 or 2 shield why would you spend another $500 to upgrade to a shield plus (or similar)? Now if you saw someone fired 7-8 and that wasn’t enough maybe you get a gun that holds 10+ and replace your old one. Maybe you explore .30 super gay and that catches on rather than being a huge waste of time. Maybe you get a .22, .32, or .380 as a BUG to complement a larger carry gun. Both the anti gun and pro gun crowds benefit from such a story getting out. Gun owners themselves also do, by being able to base carry choices around reality. There’s no downside for such an example to not become well known. Im not saying its NEVER happened because you can’t prod that, but its incredibly incredibly rare and no one can’t point to an example.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                there aren't any, and despite any amount of coping that imperatively means it's pure speculation whenever anyone brings this shit up

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >replace a documented incident with my cuck bwno fantasy and you will see that I am correct

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >why even take the chance?
                That your auto will jam? I agree.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >inner city PD gun carried by a non white, shot 2 times a year, last cleaned in 2011
                >jams
                damn how’d that happen?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Black person
                >pigger
                >expecting a bare minimum of competency
                Anon…

                Meanwhile I’ll continue to trust my skills

                >It can't happen to me
                >I'm God's special little creature

                lol

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                How many fricking times does your dumb ass try to clear the jam before you say frick it go for the back up?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Is he actually racking the slide after 0:08? It looks like he's just tugging and tapping on it over and over again

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >not limp wristing is an unreasonable assumption
                Post guns

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >he thinks random shit can't happen to him in the split second he needs his gun on the worst day of his life

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >video shows either a faulty round or a complete moron that carries without a round in the chamber
                ok
                >limp wristing is a random dice roll event like real life is a video game and has nothing to do with proficiency or gun maintenance
                ok
                have you ever actually tried limp wristing a glock, or does all your knowledge come from videos you found on the internet of other people being moronic?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/U3MqUiH.jpeg

                >doesn’t post guns
                >posts another video which isn’t even limp wristing
                You could just post guns

                Seething so hard you had to samegay kek

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Seething so hard because you own no guns

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >doesn’t post guns
                >posts another video which isn’t even limp wristing
                You could just post guns

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                357 Magnum in a wheelgun and this homosexual would have been dead at the 0:05 mark

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Honestly I just limp wrist check my guns by shooting them with an intentionally shitty grip when vetting for reliability and keep them reasonably clean, if it doesn't function with poor form then it's a range toy or getting sold off.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                All I'm saying is by virtue of being an autoloader it is open to all the malfunctions it's possible to have during the firing cycle of an autoloader. It's inescapable. No amount of cope will make it not true.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                How many fricking times does your dumb ass try to clear the jam before you say frick it go for the back up?

                >How many fricking times does your dumb ass try to clear the jam before you say frick it go for the back up?
                Cops in Anaheim are a special type of dumb

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >mouth breathing moron california cop
                you arent helping your case, homosexual

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I like how people use cops as an example of why they need to buy a bunch of moronic shit right up until it's a clear example of why it's moronic shit.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Black person
                >pigger
                >expecting a bare minimum of competency
                Anon…

                Meanwhile I’ll continue to trust my skills

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Be in an actual life-or-death shooting situation
                >Glock jams
                >Stand in the open while trying to clear your Glock

                Why are some people so dumb?
                Also, he should have moved from cover to cover, not from cover into the wide open.
                IMO the only he didn't get killed is because another leo bailed him out.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >subway car is extremely close quarters.
                So similar to 95% of attacks
                >they were also unarmed teenagers.
                They weren’t unarmed. Also
                >teenagers
                Lol ok
                >push the Black person encounter out to 15-20 feet with 3-4 experienced Black folk
                What is an experienced Black person and what were these? Why were they not experienced?
                >i doubt the results would have been the same.
                Then show me a different case that turned out poorly. I’ll wait.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                > is gonna be enough for a pack of feral Black folk
                Ahem
                >https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1984_New_York_City_Subway_shooting
                5 shots for 4 Black folk and that’s still the record for the most documented attackers out in public. Rittenhouse was in the middle of a riot and still only fired what, 7 shots?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It was 8 total I believe, split 4 and 4 with a minute or two between them.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I think it is relevant. You must be prepared for the worst case scenario, you cannot assume that your adversary will flee at the first sign of resistance. It is true in most civilian involved shootings that the attackers flee as soon as the shots start, some times it’s different. Clearly carrying a double stack 9mm and spare mag is not prohibitive bulk since so many people do.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >You must be prepared for the worst case scenario

                How many times a week you drilling malf remediation cuz? Let's talk realistic probabilities my Black person.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >How many times a week you drilling malf remediation cuz?
                none because glock perfecfion™

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I do it every range trip, I use Winchester ammunition which does it naturally.

                The drill I do is drop mag, rack slide to clear it, load spare mag

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Police shootings and average Joe defensive shootings don't play out the same way because
                average Joe isn't trying to capture/kill anyone(usually)

                Your CC exists so you can break contact. Shrimple as.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Except for the guys who carry 30+ year old snubnose .38s with wadcutters. You guys are cool.
      Oh gosh.jpg

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I can promise you that nobody has ever cared about your opinion of them, and never will. Skitter on back to /arg/

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        [...]
        Seething so hard you had to samegay kek

        >Every fricking revolver thread turns into the same boring debate with the same fricking morons throwing the same fricking shit arguments at each other. The posting cadence doesn't even vary. I'm so sick of it.

        It's because they're no-guns Glock fanbois who are looking for attention

        One of the local ranges has a Wheelgun night once a month and the whole vibe is always more relaxed and fun than any other special event they do with the exception of their annual fundraiser which is a Bourbon and Bullets night.

        Fitzanon pls go outside or something instead of trying to stir shit up on a hasbeen image board on a Saturday morning

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          lol none of those are me. You gays see me around every corner. Also I did go outside for my morning walk.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >semiauto handguns
        >/arg/
        Huh?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          For those suffering terminal neofudd brainrot /arg/ is some boogeyman that is behind any instance of someone here preferring anything that has a basis beyond mid 19th Cent technology

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Sounds like it struck true after all

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I want a SP101 but I cant decide between the snub or 3inch, but I also want to get an old security six first. Maybe a few more vintage smiths too. Maybe a few more colts.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Taurus poorgays seething

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ruger babies on suicide watch

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        65? What's the dash brother?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          66, it's a dash 5, production year 2000, so right before the Hillary hole

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Sorry I don't have pics of it, but are factory guns usually filthy?
    None of those I bought were ever filthy. Even the used ones had been cleaned perfectly. You stumble upon a shitty GS. Leave a bad review on yelp and tripadvisor.

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    GP100 here weighs 36oz, the 686+ weighs 37.4oz.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      And their dimensions.

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    zoomers were a fricking mistake

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Got to look for the cylinder lock ring made on the cylinder.

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not that I have a dog in this fight since I own and enjoy cowboy guns and tacticool larperator shit, but
    >These companies are offering new revolver products, so therefore the gun market is bored with ARs and the like and want to return to monke
    seems like a bit of a stretch in terms of conclusions

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don't think the whole market is or even a majority of it is so I'm sorry if my original statement seemed exaggerated, but I think there is a growing segment that does. Tactical guns have to hit a peak at some point and I think we're there.

      >CZ group seems to have bought Colt just to churn out revolvers.
      yeah because og pythons sell for like 3k despite being mid. Selling new production ones for 1k is a no brainer for a company trying to wring out as much profit as they can from the aging prostitute that is 'Colt'
      >Kimber makes revolvers now.
      yeah and who the frick wants them? they're ugly cudgels that cost as much or more than proven S&W or ruger models.
      >S&W released new carry models at shot show this year
      because S&W has consistently been making revolvers, same as ruger.

      You can dislike those models but they've introduced them because they sell. You can tell a production gun is doing well when the manufacturer starts releasing multiple variants of the same gun, which both Colt and Kimber are.

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Jfc dunno why every revolver thread lately winds up making me embarrassed to carry an LCR but boy howdy it keeps happening

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >seeks internet validation for bad exerience
    >no images or evidence to give to the peanut gallery to base their opinions off of

    Sounds like you were in the wrong OP

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Btw I daily carry the sp101 4”. Great revolver

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Post a picture of it. What holster do you use?

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Every fricking revolver thread turns into the same boring debate with the same fricking morons throwing the same fricking shit arguments at each other. The posting cadence doesn't even vary. I'm so sick of it.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not much has changed in the revolver world for a long time. Only so many places to take it.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah notice how there are multiple places to take it and not the exact same goddamn one time and time again. You're probably one of the posters that are the cause of it.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you sound angry grandpa. sit down and clean with your 44 magnum before you have a stress induced heart attack because the kids are arguing about capacity again

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          want to cry some more?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This board was killed long ago, sooner you accept that the better you'll be

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is why I have so many pastas. I'm working on "The Final Solution" to the revolver question right now.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If you told me a few years ago that a thread being about revolvers would be one of the surefire ways of knowing it wasn't worth going into I'd have called you a liar and told you to go back to /hgg/ lmao

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        my personal theory is that there's a handful of losers who have no social life so they're ready and waiting whenever ANY wheelgun thread is made, with a repository of cookiecutter replies minimized at all times, to derail it into yet another autoloader v. revolver homosexualfest, because like the other anon said you can tell it's the same person(s) every time because they make the same posts every time, sometimes verbatim.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I’ll be honest, I like the big bore revolver stuff, but I try not to go super crazy posting it all the damn time… still end up posting more than I should though…

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Every fricking revolver thread turns into the same boring debate with the same fricking morons throwing the same fricking shit arguments at each other. The posting cadence doesn't even vary. I'm so sick of it.

      It's because they're no-guns Glock fanbois who are looking for attention

      One of the local ranges has a Wheelgun night once a month and the whole vibe is always more relaxed and fun than any other special event they do with the exception of their annual fundraiser which is a Bourbon and Bullets night.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >post with expression of general dissatisfaction at the current state of revolver threads
        >reply with broad, antagonizing accusation and cringy r/thathappened-grade anecdote meant solely to spur mentioned tired debate
        Exhibit A of the problem.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Wow golly gee is this JUST like your little reddit board, little guy? The narwhal bacons at midnight, am I right??

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          [...]
          [...]
          Fitzanon pls go outside or something instead of trying to stir shit up on a hasbeen image board on a Saturday morning

          SAMEgayGERY so obvious even a caveman can spot it

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >shitstirrers are present
    >likely here and stirring shit because they're bored
    >instead of just talking about six-guns and six-gun accessories, directly mention or even worse interact with the stirrers of the shit
    >this gives the fecal stimulators the attention and neural outlet they're craving and incited more shitstirring
    >thread goes to shit
    >rinse and repeat
    >wonder why this keeps happening
    You will never learn and because of that nothing will change

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      m8 even if it was just relegated to actual revolver focused discussion it'd be nothing but the usual Taurus vs. Ruger bullshit and shills desperately trying to get .327 to take off so they can stop $45 per box to feed the Taurus/Ruger chambered in it that they got conned into buying by the fat "former SEAL" behind the gun counter. shit's permanently fricked.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Is anyone else every dumbfounded at people's love of focusing on shit they don't like? Like Black person if you don't like it why are you thinking about it, seething about it, posting about it. Anyone doing all that shit MUST like it right? Otherwise they would frick off and think/do/post about some other shit they DO like.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Is this directed at the autogays who enter revolver threads to shit on revolvers, or revolvergays who literally cannot go ten minutes without mentioning how much they hate autos, or both

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I don't ever see revolver bros "hating" autoloaders. I do see them saying why they don't like them or why they chose revolvers instead and this makes people lose their fricking minds for some reason. It's mostly just garden variety trolling. Pretty easy to get some negative attention if you want to.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah I kinda figured that's what you were going to say. Have a good 'un.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >says all revolver threads are the same
                >knows what every response to all his posts will be

                Black person you've attained god status on a peruvian cui husbandry forum. It's time to go forth and conquer new worlds.

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Hands down worst handgun I've ever owned.

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I need to make this a square on the “revolver thread bingo” card..

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >“revolver thread bingo”
      >blow'd up rhino
      >fitzposting
      >cuck lock shaming
      >muh .32s
      >small .357s are for morons
      >THEN WHY DON'T COPS AND SOLDIERS USE REVOLVERS?
      >autos jam(much kvetching ensues)

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >ruger pot metal
        >burger advertisements

        >not a single mention of the Rossi taurus's
        >hillary hole
        >MiM parts
        >OLT
        >disputed dimensions that no one can pin down
        >weight is bad
        >weight is good
        >357 GAINS NOTHING OVER 38 IN A 2"
        >5 shots bad you'll die without that extra

  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Call it /k/ revolver bingo.
    Only post your randomized score card in a thread when you win.

  28. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This Website generates a card and randomizes it. https://bingocards.fun/
    The 5x5 spaces:
    357 same as 38 in 2"
    Rhino Esplode
    Weight is good
    Fitzposting
    Bubba'd
    Locks in non-S&W revolvers
    Small 357s are useless
    Why don't cops use revolvers?
    327 FED
    Semi Auto Jams
    Rugers are pot metal
    Adverts for burgers
    >Taurus
    Hillary Hole
    OLT
    >Taurus in Rossi clothes
    Weight is bad
    5 shots will get you killed
    Tactical revolvers
    BEEG BORE
    5 shots because Goetz
    Manurhin survives billion rounds
    Home gunsmithing
    Police (hiv) Positive
    Humpback J

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Fricking based lmao
      General mood across the board seems pretty negative. I don't know why. But u do kniw I would spring for a trr8 if I fiund a good deal on it, because I played too much CSGO

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >But u do kniw I would spring for a trr8 if I fiund a good deal on it, because I played too much CSGO
        Lol I've considered a Nova for the same reason. I MIGHT use it hunting, maybe, eventually, probably not.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Fantastic, but does need a “fire it from inside your pocket”

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        True, as well as pocket carry.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >revolvers jam too you guise

  29. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why are revolver threads full of grandpa fudds relentlessly defending their objectively inferior firearms? Yeah they’re cool, nostalgic, and good looking but in terms of functionality, they are beaten be semi automatics 100% of the time. You homosexuals are stuck in 1976

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Exhibit B to go along with my earlier post

      >post with expression of general dissatisfaction at the current state of revolver threads
      >reply with broad, antagonizing accusation and cringy r/thathappened-grade anecdote meant solely to spur mentioned tired debate
      Exhibit A of the problem.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        gay

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because before 2020 people who owned guns did it because they enjoyed it and it satisfied autism. You are an instagram minmaxxing zoomer, Kys.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >inferior
      Never understood this meme. Good .38 +p sits snug between .380 and 9mm, assuming all 3 are fired from a similar length barrel. Through snubbies/pocket pistols, both .38 and 9mm have ammo availability that exceeds FBI ballistic requirements. You act like a good revolver won't kill you just as dead now as it did 100 years ago, as if we're now more bulletproof, or that you're going to be laying down suppressive fire with your lcp max.

  30. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Aren't those revolvers more or less built like a tank though? Regardless sounds like a great deal anyway. Also small businesses in general are struggling to get by you selfish little frick.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Also small businesses in general are struggling to get by you selfish little frick.

      only morons defend mom and pop gunstores. their entire business model is scamming people.

  31. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I saw someone post a revolver a while back. It had a metal hand/finger grip that rose out past the regular grip. I have no idea what the grip is referred to as. I think the pistol was a DA. Would anyone know what I'm attempting to describe?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >It had a metal hand/finger grip that rose out past the regular grip.

      took me three re-reads to figure out you mean T-Grips, yeah sorta hard to describe.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, that's exactly it. I had no idea. Thank you

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *